Parenchyma-Sparing Hepatectomy with Vascular Reconstruction Techniques for Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases with Major Vascular Invasion

Initial experience of parenchyma-sparing liver resection with systematic selective hepatic vein reconstruction for colorectal metastases

Objectives

This study aims to assess the feasibility and short-term and intermediate-term technical success rate of the concept of systematic selective hepatic vein (HV) reconstruction for parenchyma-sparing hepatectomies (PSHs) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in accordance with stage 2a of the IDEAL framework.

Design

The prospective case series of patients deemed eligible and operated on according to the concept.

Setting

All patients were treated by a single surgical team in three hospitals in Ukraine from June 2022 to November 2023.

Participants

The study included nine cases of resectable CRLM with at least one lesion located in the hepatocaval confluence with HV(s) invasion, for whom reconstruction of the HV(s) allowed for additional parenchyma preservation, being an alternative to major or extended hepatectomy.

Interventions

Liver resections with different types of HVs reconstruction (primary closure, patching, end-to-end anastomosis with or without grafting) were performed after a thorough evaluation of the future liver remnant volume, volume of potentially additionally preserved parenchyma and possibility of future repeat hepatectomies.

Main outcome measures

Postoperative morbidity, short-term and long-term patency of the reconstructed vessels, and the volume of additionally preserved parenchyma were the focus.

Results

Segmental resection was performed in four cases, two with graft interposition. Patch reconstruction was performed for three HVs and two inferior vena cava resections. Two cases required primary closure. No mortality was observed, while the major morbidity rate was 33%. The short-term and long-term patency of the reconstructed HVs was 88.9% and 66.7%, respectively. HV reconstructions allowed the preservation of additional parenchyma (mean 495.4 mL, 95% CI 350.2 to 640.7). A decision-making algorithm to be used within the described approach is proposed.

Conclusions

Selective HV reconstruction is a feasible approach for PSH for CRLM. Further studies are needed to compare this approach to convenient major hepatectomies.

Short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection with hepatic vein reconstruction for liver tumors: A nationwide multicenter survey

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study clarifies the short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection with hepatic vein (HV) reconstruction for liver tumors and identifies the risk factors for poor outcome.

METHODS

We contacted 263 specialized centers in Japan and collected data on this surgical procedure. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, and outcomes were then analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients were enrolled from 36 institutions. Grade C post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and in-hospital mortality were 3.2% and 1.6%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 49.9 and 9.8 months, respectively. Surgical outcomes, OS and RFS did not differ among three types of liver tumors, colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) (n = 127), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 27), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 27). Patients with CRLM and seven or more courses of preoperative chemotherapy had significantly worse OS. Compared with HV reconstruction for securing liver remnant (LR) function (n = 148), reconstruction of the only main HV remaining in the LR (n = 39) had significantly worse short-term outcomes, but did not result in increased mortality, and showed equivalent OS and RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection with HV reconstruction can be achieved safely and contributes to a relatively good long-term outcome for patients with advanced liver malignancies.

Influence of biliary and vascular resection types on morbidity in hepatectomies with vascular involvement

INTRODUCTION

Hepatectomies associated with vascular resections pose a technical challenge for surgeons, involving multiple reconstruction techniques. Moreover, adding clinical and surgical risks in the postoperative setting of these complex procedures are mainly due to prolonged surgical periods and potential complications inherent to vascular manipulation. Leveraging the expertise of a Cancer Center, we propose an institutional assessment utilizing the case series from A. C. Camargo Cancer Center in hepatectomies associated with vascular resection, evaluating postoperative complications and outcomes while highlighting clinical, laboratory, pathological, and surgical factors that may influence results.

OBJECTIVE

To assess mortality and morbidity associated with hepatectomies involving vascular resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a prospective database, a study was performed evaluating postoperative survival and morbidity using scoring systems such as Clavien-Dindo through a cohort analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 1021 liver resections for a period of 10 years, 31 cases were evaluated from a unique cancer center in Brazil! Factors such as the performance of major hepatectomies, the need for blood transfusion, and the administration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy did not appear to influence the outcome of morbidity or mortality. However, the resection of the associated bile duct and the type of vascular resection seemed to influence morbidity outcomes with statistical significance (p = 0.006+ …).

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomies associated with vascular resections are safe in selected cases and when performed in referral centers. Factors such as associated bile duct resection and type of vascular resection should be considered for procedure indication.

Resection and reconstruction of the largest abdominal vein system (the inferior vena cava, hepatic, and portal vein): a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As tumors invade major abdominal veins, surgical procedures are transformed from simple and basic to complicated and challenging. In this narrative review, we focus on what is currently known and not known regarding the technical aspects of major abdominal venous resection and its reconstruction, patency, and oncologic benefit in a cross-cutting perspective.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Semantic Scholar from inception up to October 18, 2023. We reviewed 106 papers by title, abstract, and full text regarding resection or reconstruction of the inferior vena cava, hepatic vein confluence, portal vein (PV), and middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a cross-cutting perspective.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

The oncologic benefit of aggressive hepatic vein resection with suitable reconstruction against adenocarcinoma remains unclear, and further studies are required to clarify this point. A superior mesenteric/PV resection is now a universal, indispensable, and effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although many case series using tailor-made autologous venous grafts have been reported, not only size mismatch but also additional surgical incisions and a longer operation time remain obstacles for venous reconstruction. The use of autologous alternative tissue remains only an alternative procedure because the patency rate of customized tubular conduit type to interpose or replace the resected vein is not known. Unlike arterial replacement, venous replacement using synthetic vascular grafts is still rarely reported and there are several inherent limitations except for reconstruction of tributaries of MHV in LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Various approaches to abdominal vein resection and replacement or reconstruction are technically feasible with satisfactory results. Synthetic vascular grafts may be appropriate but have a certain rate of complications.

Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases with Major Vessel Involvement

BACKGROUND

Treatment of CRLM with major vessel involvement is still challenging and valid data on outcomes are still rare. We analyzed our experience of hepatectomies with resection and reconstruction of major hepatic vessels with regard to operative and perioperative details, histopathological findings and oncological outcome.

METHODS

Data of 32 hepatectomies with major hepatic vessel resections and reconstructions were included. Results were correlated with perioperative and oncological outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 1236 surgical resections due to CRLM, we performed 35 major hepatic vessel resections and reconstructions in 32 cases (2.6%) during the study period from January 2008 to March 2023. The vena cava inferior (VCI) was resected and reconstructed in 19, the portal vein (PV) in 6 and a hepatic vein (HV) in 10 cases. Histopathological examination confirmed a vascular infiltration in 6/32 patients (VCI 3/17, HV 2/10 and PV 1/6). There were 27 R0 and 5 R1 resections. All R1 situations affected the parenchymal margin. Vascular wall margins were R0. Ninety-day mortality was 0. The median overall survival (OS) for the patient group with vascular infiltration (V1) was 21 months and for the V0 group 33.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver resections with vascular resection and reconstruction are rare and histological vessel infiltration occurs seldom. In cases with presumed vascular wall infiltration, liver resection combined with major vessel resection and reconstruction can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. We prefer a parenchymal sparing liver resection with vascular resection and reconstruction to achieve negative resection margins, but in technically difficult cases with higher risk for postoperative complications, tumor detachment from vessels without resection is a most reasonable surgical alternative.

[Vascular reconstruction and transplantation technologies in liver surgery (part II)]

OBJECTIVE

To systematize tactical and technical aspects of liver resections with reconstruction of afferent and efferent blood supply and/or inferior vena cava; to study postoperative outcomes in patients with focal liver lesions using transplantation technologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 413 patients with parasitic lesions, primary and secondary liver tumors involving great vessels (portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, right atrium). All ones underwent liver resections with vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as liver autotransplantation in vivo, ante situ (ex situ in vivo), extracorporeal liver resections with autotransplantation (ex vivo).

RESULTS

We obtained satisfactory immediate results after liver resections using transplantation technologies.

CONCLUSION

Transplantation technologies in liver surgery can significantly increase resectability of tumors and survival of patients. Transplantation technologies are an important new surgical strategy and necessary option in modern hepatic surgery.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: A Systematic Review

Combined hepatic and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving the IVC. Most of the existing data come from case reports or small case series. In this paper, a systematic review based on the PICO strategy was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Papers from January 1980 to December 2022 were searched in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles considered for inclusion had to present data on simultaneous liver and IVC resection for CRLM and report surgical and/or oncological outcomes. From a total of 1175 articles retrieved, 29, including a total of 188 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.3 ± 10.8 years. The most frequent techniques used were right hepatectomy ± caudate lobe for hepatic resections (37.8%), lateral clamping (44.8%) for vascular control, and primary closure (56.8%) for IVC repair. The thirty-day mortality reached 4.6%. Tumour relapse was reported in 65.8% of the cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 34 months (with a confidence interval of 30-40 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 71.4%, 19.8%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the absence of prospective randomized studies, which are difficult to perform, IVC resection seems to be safe and feasible.

[Vascular reconstructions and transplant technologies in liver surgery (part I)]

OBJECTIVE

To systematize technical aspects of liver resections with reconstruction of afferent and efferent liver blood supply and/or inferior vena cava, as well as to analyze the results of surgical treatment in patients with focal liver lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 413 patients with parasitic lesions, primary and secondary liver tumors with great vessel invasion (portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, right atrium). These features excluded radical liver resections without vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as liver autotransplantation in vivo, liver autotransplantation ante situ (ex situ in vivo), extracorporeal liver resections with autotransplantation (ex vivo).

RESULTS

Surgical interventions were systematized depending of surgical tactics and techniques, technical complexity, type and number of reconstructed vessels, the use of total vascular isolation and cold preservation techniques, resection and reconstruction of great vessels. Thus, 4 gradations were allocated (Grade I-IV). The definition of transplantation technologies in liver surgery was proposed.

CONCLUSION

Transplantation technologies in liver surgery include liver resections supplemented with vascular reconstruction of afferent and efferent liver blood supply, inferior vena cava including total vascular isolation of liver under normo- or hypothermia. These measures can significantly extend the possibilities of resection.

Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy with hepatic vein resection and reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy remains the most important treatment modality for most malignant liver tumors. Vascular involvement stays a reason for unresectability or major parenchymal resection. A possible way to avoid this is parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSHX) with vascular resection and reconstruction (HVRR). In this article, we aim to demonstrate the specific role of this technique in avoiding post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 10 patients who underwent HVRR was conducted. ^99mTechnetium-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) was used to predict the future liver remnant function (FLRF). Calculations were made for each patient to compare HVRR and major hepatectomy (with or without portal vein embolization).

RESULTS

In our cohort, there was no perioperative mortality. Two patients suffered a Clavien-Dindo grade 3a complication and none had clinically significant PHLF. Estimated FLRF was significantly higher in HVRR compared to major hepatectomy after portal vein embolization (p < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Instead of focusing on inducing liver remnant hypertrophy, preserving parenchyma through HVRR can be an interesting treatment strategy. It can be performed with an acceptable operative risk. Calculations of FLRF (using HBS) suggest that this approach is able to reduce the risk for PHLF and related morbidity or mortality.

Bisegmentectomy and venous reconstruction after portal vein embolization for the remnant hemiliver in a patient with recurrent colorectal liver metastases

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) for the remnant hemiliver is sometimes challenging due to the insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) volume. We present an aggressive strategy for resection of the recurrent CRLM involving bisegmentectomy of the remnant right hemiliver with the aid of portal vein embolization (PVE) and venous reconstruction. The patient was a 50-year-old woman who had undergone left hemihepatectomy for a CRLM 10 months ago. Three metastatic tumors were found in the remnant segments 7 and 8 (S7&8) of the liver, and one of them involved the right hepatic vein (RHV). Conducting bisegmentectomy of S7&8 with resection of the RHV, the non-congestive FLR volume was calculated as 34.9% of the remnant total liver volume, which was deemed insufficient considering the mild liver damage after repeated chemotherapy. After trans-ileocecal PVE of the portal branches in S7&8 in a hybrid angio room, the non-congestive FLR volume increased to 42.3%, which could be further advanced to 58.0% if the RHV was reconstructed. Segmentectomies of S7&8 with resection and reconstruction of the RHV using the right superficial femoral vein graft was performed. The patient was discharged without any complications, and the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed the good patency of the reconstructed venous graft. Aggressive segmentectomies and venous reconstruction of the remnant hemiliver after PVE might be a new strategy to overcome the insufficient FLR volume.

Vascular Resection During Hepatectomy for Liver Malignancies. Results from a Tertiary Center using Autologous Peritoneal Patch for Venous Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To evaluate early outcomes of venous reconstruction with peritoneal patch (PP) during resection for hepatic malignancies.

METHODS

Since May 2015, PP was considered as the first option for venous reconstruction in the case of lateral resection. Between May 2015 and June 2019, 579 consecutive hepatectomies for malignancies were performed at our institution. Among 27 patients requiring venous resection, PP was used in 22, who were included in the present study. Data from a prospectively collected database were analysed.

RESULTS

Tumour types were ten colorectal metastases (CRLM), six intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, four hilar cholangiocarcinomas, one hepatocellular carcinoma and one gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatectomies were major in 50% of cases. Eleven patients had hepatic vein resections, eight portal vein and three inferior vena cava. Venous reconstruction enabled resection in 12 (54.5%) patients, otherwise non-resectable. Among CRLM, the venous reconstruction allowed avoidance of major resection in eight (80%) cases. Median operative time was 456 min (range 270-960). Blood loss was a median 300 cc (range 40-1500), and blood transfusions were required in three patients (13.6%). At pathological examination, venous infiltration was confirmed in 14 (63.6%) patients. No vascular complications related to the patch were recorded. Post-operative major (Dindo III/IV) complications were observed in two (9%) patients. One patient died because of liver failure without vascular thrombosis and one due to biliary fistula complicated by arterial bleeding. Overall, post-operative mortality was 9% (2/22).

CONCLUSIONS

Venous reconstruction with peritoneal patch during hepatectomy for malignancies can feasibly allow resection in otherwise unresectable patients and decrease the rate of major resection in colorectal liver metastases.

Current trends in vena cava reconstructive techniques with major liver resection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Historically, invasion of the inferior vena cava (IVC) represented advanced and often unresectable hepatic disease. With surgical and anesthetic innovations, IVC resection and reconstruction have become feasible in selected patients. This review assesses technical variations in reconstructive techniques and post-operative management.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed according to PRISMA. Inclusion criteria were (i) peer-reviewed articles in English; (ii) at least three cases; (iii) hepatic IVC resection and reconstruction (January 2015-March 2020). Primary outcomes were reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic regimen, post-operative IVC patency, and infection. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications and malignant disease survival.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were included allowing for investigation of 351 individual patients. Analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity in surgical reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic management, and post-operative monitoring of patency. There was increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass compared with previously published reviews.

CONCLUSION

This review of literature published between 2015 and 2020 reveals persistent heterogeneity of hepatic IVC reconstructive techniques and peri-operative management. Increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass point towards improved operative techniques, peri-operative management, and anesthesia. In order to gain evidence for consensus on management, a registry would be beneficial.

How Has Virtual Hepatectomy Changed the Practice of Liver Surgery?: Experience of 1194 Virtual Hepatectomy Before Liver Resection and Living Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess how virtual hepatectomy (VH), conducted using surgical planning software, influences the outcomes of liver surgery.

BACKGROUND

Imaging technology visualizes the territories of the liver vessels, which were previously impossible. However, the clinical impact of VH has not been evaluated.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2013, we performed 1194 VHs preoperatively. Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)/colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were compared between patients in whom VH was performed (VH) and those without VH evaluation (non-VH).

RESULTS

In LDLT, the rate of right liver graft use was higher in the VH (62.1%) than in the non-VH (46.5%) (P < 0.01), which did not increase morbidity of donor surgery. Duration of recipient surgery in the VH in which middle hepatic vein branch reconstruction was skipped was shorter than that in the VH with venous reconstruction. Among HCC patients with impaired liver function, portal territory-oriented resection was conducted more often in the VH than in the non-VH. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for localized HCC was higher in the VH than in the non-VH (37.2% vs 23.9%; P = 0.04). In CRLM, long-term outcomes were similar in the VH and non-VH despite the larger tumor load in the VH.

CONCLUSIONS

VH in LDLT allows double equipoise for the recipient and donor by optimizing decision-making on graft selection and venous reconstruction. VH offers a chance for radical hepatectomy even in HCC patients with impaired liver function and CRLM patients with advanced tumors, without compromising survival.

How to increase the resectability of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A surgical perspective

Although surgical resection is the only treatment of choice that can offer prolonged survival and a chance of cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), nearly 80% of patients are deemed to be unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Considerable efforts have been made to overcome this initial unresectability, including expanding the indication of surgery, the advent of conversion chemotherapy, and development and modification of specific surgical techniques, regulated under multidisciplinary approaches. In terms of specific surgical techniques, portal vein ligation/embolization can increase the volume of future liver remnant and thereby reduce the risk of hepatic insufficiency and death after major hepatectomy. For multiple bilobar CRLM that were traditionally considered unresectable even with preoperative chemotherapy and portal vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy was introduced and has been adopted worldwide with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Recently, ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) was reported as a novel variant of two-stage hepatectomy. Although issues regarding safety remain unresolved, rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy and subsequent shorter intervals between the two stages lead to a higher feasibility rate, reaching 98%. In addition, adding radiofrequency ablation and vascular resection and reconstruction techniques can allow expansion of the pool of patients with CRLM who are candidates for liver resection and thus a cure. In this review, we discuss specific techniques that may expand the criteria for resectability in patients with initially unresectable CRLM.

Two-stage hepatectomy aiming for the development of intrahepatic venous collaterals for multiple colorectal liver metastases

Background

Aggressive hepatectomy with venous resection has a higher risk of postoperative liver failure (POLF) than hepatectomy without venous reconstruction; however, venous reconstruction is technically demanding. We performed a novel two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) without venous reconstruction in a patient with bilobar multiple colorectal liver metastases located near the caval confluence, waiting for the development of intrahepatic venous collaterals between procedures.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old man was referred to our hospital with sigmoid colon cancer accompanied by intraabdominal abscess and two synchronous liver metastases. One of the liver tumors (tumor 1) was located in segment 8 near the caval confluence and was attached to both the right hepatic vein (RHV) and middle hepatic vein (MHV). The other tumor (tumor 2) in the left lobe invaded the umbilical portion of the portal vein. Both liver metastases decreased in size after four cycles of panitumumab/5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) therapy. Radical liver resection was planned because tumor 1 had not invaded the MHV. However, three-dimensional volumetric software showed that the non-congested volume of the future liver remnant was estimated at 354 ml, which corresponded to 26.3% of the total liver volume. TSH was scheduled to avoid POLF. We first performed limited resection of segment 8 with resection of the RHV root. After the first hepatectomy, the development of intrahepatic venous collaterals between the RHV and MHV was seen on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The estimated non-congested future liver remnant was 1242 ml, 78.5% of the total liver volume. Therefore, the patient underwent left hemihepatectomy 58 days after the first hepatectomy. We saw no adhesions around the porta hepatis, and the left hepatic artery and left branch of the portal vein were safely exposed and divided. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography revealed intrahepatic venous collaterals arising from RHV to MHV. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and he underwent eight cycles of panitumumab/FOLFOX therapy for 5 months after the second hepatectomy.

Conclusions

Our TSH strategy helped avoid POLF by waiting for the development of intrahepatic venous collaterals.