1
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee G, Kim DW, Smart AC, Horick NK, Eyler CE, Roberts HJ, Pathak P, Goyal L, Franses J, Heather JM, Hwang WL, Grassberger C, Klempner SJ, Drapek LC, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Parikh AR, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Hong TS, Wo JY. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Is Associated With Worse Survival in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2024:00000421-990000000-00194. [PMID: 38767086 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiotherapy (RT)-related lymphopenia, its predictors, and association with survival in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated-RT (HF-RT). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 96 patients with unresectable ICC who underwent HF-RT (median 58.05 Gy in 15 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir within 12 weeks of RT was analyzed. Primary variable of interest was severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3+ (ALC <0.5 k/μL) per CTCAE v5.0. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from RT. RESULTS Median follow-up was 16 months. Fifty-two percent of patients had chemotherapy pre-RT, 23% during RT, and 40% post-RT. Pre-RT, median ALC was 1.1 k/μL and 5% had severe lymphopenia. Post-RT, 68% developed RT-related severe lymphopenia. Patients who developed severe lymphopenia had a significantly lower pre-RT ALC (median 1.1 vs. 1.5 k/μL, P=0.01) and larger target tumor volume (median 125 vs. 62 cm3, P=0.02). In our multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of death (P=0.04); 1-year OS rates were 63% vs 77% (P=0.03). Receipt of photon versus proton-based RT (OR=3.50, P=0.02), higher mean liver dose (OR=1.19, P<0.01), and longer RT duration (OR=1.49, P=0.02) predicted severe lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS HF-RT-related lymphopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with unresectable ICC. Patients with lower baseline ALC and larger tumor volume may be at increased risk, and use of proton therapy, minimizing mean liver dose, and avoiding treatment breaks may reduce RT-related lymphopenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel W Kim
- Inova Mather Proton Centre, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, VA
| | - Alicia C Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nora K Horick
- Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Christine E Eyler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Hannah J Roberts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Priyadarshini Pathak
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Joseph Franses
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - James M Heather
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School Department of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - William L Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Samuel J Klempner
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lorraine C Drapek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jill N Allen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David P Ryan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bragazzi MC, Venere R, Ribichini E, Covotta F, Cardinale V, Alvaro D. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evolving strategies in management and treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:383-393. [PMID: 37722960 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. According to International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is identified by a specific diagnostic code, different with respect to perihilar-CCA or distal-CCA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma originates from intrahepatic small or large bile ducts including the second-order bile ducts and has a silent presentation that combined with the highly aggressive nature and refractoriness to chemotherapy contributes to the alarming increasing incidence and mortality. Indeed, at the moment of the diagnosis, less than 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are suitable of curative surgical therapy, that is so far the only effective treatment. The main goals of clinicians and researchers are to make an early diagnosis, and to carry out molecular characterization to provide the patient with personalized treatment. Unfortunately, these goals are not easily achievable because of the heterogeneity of this tumor from anatomical, molecular, biological, and clinical perspectives. However, recent progress has been made in molecular characterization, surgical treatment, and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and, this article deals with these advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Consiglia Bragazzi
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Italy.
| | - Rosanna Venere
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Italy
| | - Emanuela Ribichini
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Covotta
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cardinale
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holzner ML, Mazzaferro V, Busset MDD, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Hasegawa K, Arita J, Sapisochin G, Abreu P, Schoning W, Schmelzle M, Nevermann N, Pratschke J, Florman S, Halazun K, Schwartz ME, Tabrizian P. Is Repeat Resection for Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Warranted? Outcomes of an International Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-14975-w. [PMID: 38334851 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14975-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after liver resection (LR) remains high, and optimal therapy for recurrent ICC is challenging. Herein, we assess the outcomes of patients undergoing repeat resection for recurrent ICC in a large, international multicenter cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Outcomes of adults from six large hepatobiliary centers in North America, Europe, and Asia with recurrent ICC following primary LR between 2001 and 2015 were analyzed. Cox models determined predictors of post-recurrence survival. RESULTS Of patients undergoing LR for ICC, 499 developed recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 10 months, and 47% were intrahepatic. Overall 3-year post-recurrence survival rate was 28.6%. In total, 121 patients (25%) underwent repeat resection, including 74 (61%) repeat LRs. Surgically treated patients were more likely to have solitary intrahepatic recurrences and significantly prolonged survival compared with those receiving locoregional or systemic therapy alone with a 3-year post-recurrence survival rate of 47%. Independent predictors of post-recurrence death included time to recurrence < 1 year [HR 1.66 (1.32-2.10), p < 0.001], site of recurrence [HR 1.74 (1.28-2.38), p < 0.001], macrovascular invasion [HR 1.43 (1.05-1.95), p = 0.024], and size of recurrence > 3 cm [HR 1.68 (1.24-2.29), p = 0.001]. Repeat resection was independently associated with decreased post-recurrence death [HR 0.58 0.43-0.78), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Repeat resection for recurrent ICC in select patients can result in extended survival. Thus, challenging the paradigm of offering these patients locoregional or chemo/palliative therapy alone as the mainstay of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Holzner
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Droz Dit Busset
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Arita
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Phillipe Abreu
- Multi-Organ Transplant and HPB Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wenzel Schoning
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mortiz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Nevermann
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sander Florman
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim Halazun
- NYU Langone Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Myron E Schwartz
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parissa Tabrizian
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang M, Qi W, Qiu X, Yu C, Qiu W, Wang S, Qiu Z. Locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:419-429. [PMID: 38038416 PMCID: PMC10690746 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (HR = 0.51; 95% CI =0.41-0.64; p value < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.71, p value = 0.002) and ORR (RR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17-2.42; p value = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56, p value < 0.001) and EBRT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.72, p value < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqi Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Molecular and Translational Research, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Weiwei Qi
- Department of Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Molecular and Translational Research, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaofei Qiu
- Qingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Qingdao Institute of Preventive Medicine, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Chunpeng Yu
- Interventional Medical Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Wensheng Qiu
- Department of Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Molecular and Translational Research, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Song Wang
- Interventional Medical Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Zhenkang Qiu
- Interventional Medical Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sheng X, Qin JM. Mechanism of postoperative recurrence and metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and clinical prevention and treatment strategy. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2023; 31:753-765. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v31.i18.753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma is a primary adenocarcinoma originating from intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells. The tumor has no capsule. At the early stage of the tumor, there are infiltration and metastasis along the lymphatic vessels, blood vessels, perineural space, and loose fibrous connective tissue, which are characterized by lymph node metastasis. Due to the absence of characteristic clinical manifestations and the lack of specific molecular markers for early diagnosis, the surgical resection rate is low and the postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis rate is high. Low efficacy of chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted drugs, and immunotherapy results in the poor prognosis. Further research of molecular pathology, gene function, and imaging technology can help elucidate the occurrence, recurrence, and metastasis mechanism of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma to improve its early diagnosis rate and precise clinical staging. Individualized precision treatment and prevention for the risk factors to reduce the recurrence and metastasis rate postoperatively are key to improving the patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Sheng
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201100, China
| | - Jian-Min Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bourien H, Pircher CC, Guiu B, Lamarca A, Valle JW, Niger M, Edeline J. Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4217. [PMID: 37686493 PMCID: PMC10486617 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héloïse Bourien
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France;
| | - Chiara Carlotta Pircher
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy; (C.C.P.); (M.N.)
| | - Boris Guiu
- Interventional Radiology Department, CHU de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France;
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Oncology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, 28022 Madrid, Spain;
- Medical Oncology Department, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Medical Oncology Department, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy; (C.C.P.); (M.N.)
| | - Julien Edeline
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhao K, Erinjeri JP, Sotirchos VS, Alexander ES, Moussa AM, Marinelli B, Ziv E, Sofocleous CT, Abou-Alfa GK, Jarnagin WR, Karimi A, Yarmohammadi H. Factors affecting outcomes of Yttrium-90 radioembolization in heavily pretreated patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2434-2442. [PMID: 37145313 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03930-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a liver-directed treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The aim of this study is to evaluate factors affecting outcomes of TARE in heavily pretreated ICC patients. METHODS We evaluated pretreated ICC patients who received TARE from January 2013 to December 2021. Prior treatments included systemic therapy, hepatic resection, and liver-directed therapies, including hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, external beam radiation, transarterial embolization, and thermal ablation. Patients were classified based on history of hepatic resection and genomic status based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after TARE. RESULTS Fourteen patients with median age 66.1 years (range, 52.4-87.5), 11 females and 3 males, were included. Prior therapies included systemic in 13/14 patients (93%), liver resection in 6/14 (43%), and liver-directed therapy in 6/14 (43%). Median OS was 11.9 months (range, 2.8-81.0). Resected patients had significantly longer median OS compared to unresected patients (16.6 versus 7.9 months; p = 0.038). Prior liver-directed therapy (p = 0.043), largest tumor diameter > 4 cm (p = 0.014), and > 2 hepatic segments involvement (p = 0.001) were associated with worse OS. Nine patients underwent NGS; 3/9 (33.3%) and had a high-risk gene signature (HRGS), defined as alterations in TP53, KRAS, or CDKN2A. Patients with a HRGS had worse median OS (10.0 versus 17.8 months; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS TARE may be used as salvage therapy in heavily treated ICC patients. Presence of a HRGS may predict worse OS after TARE. Further investigation with more patients is recommended to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica S Alexander
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amgad M Moussa
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brett Marinelli
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Etay Ziv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita Karimi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alvaro D, Gores GJ, Walicki J, Hassan C, Sapisochin G, Komuta M, Forner A, Valle JW, Laghi A, Ilyas SI, Park JW, Kelley RK, Reig M, Sangro B. EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2023; 79:181-208. [PMID: 37084797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) develops inside the liver, between bile ductules and the second-order bile ducts. It is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, and its global incidence is increasing. It is associated with an alarming mortality rate owing to its silent presentation (often leading to late diagnosis), highly aggressive nature and resistance to treatment. Early diagnosis, molecular characterisation, accurate staging and personalised multidisciplinary treatments represent current challenges for researchers and physicians. Unfortunately, these challenges are beset by the high heterogeneity of iCCA at the clinical, genomic, epigenetic and molecular levels, very often precluding successful management. Nonetheless, in the last few years, progress has been made in molecular characterisation, surgical management, and targeted therapy. Recent advances together with the awareness that iCCA represents a distinct entity amongst the CCA family, led the ILCA and EASL governing boards to commission international experts to draft dedicated evidence-based guidelines for physicians involved in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of iCCA.
Collapse
|
10
|
Owen M, Makary MS, Beal EW. Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082384. [PMID: 37190311 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Owen
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mina S Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Connor AA, Kodali S, Abdelrahim M, Javle MM, Brombosz EW, Ghobrial RM. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: The role of liver transplantation, adjunctive treatments, and prognostic biomarkers. Front Oncol 2022; 12:996710. [PMID: 36479082 PMCID: PMC9719919 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.996710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a primary epithelial cell malignancy of the liver with rising incidence rate globally. Its insidious presentation, heterogeneous and aggressive biology, and recalcitrance to current therapies results in unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. This has spurred research efforts in the last decade to better characterize it molecularly with translation to improved diagnostic tools and treatments. Much of this has been driven by patient advocacy. This has renewed interest in orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) with adjunctive therapies for iCCA, which was historically disparaged due to poor recipient outcomes and donor organ scarcity. However, the optimal use of LT as a treatment for iCCA care remains unclear. Here, we review the epidemiology of iCCA, the history of LT as a treatment modality, alternative approaches to iCCA local control, the evidence for peri-operative systemic therapies, and the potential roles of biomarkers and targeted agents. In doing so, we hope to prioritize areas for continued research and identify areas where multidisciplinary care can improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashton A. Connor
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sudha Kodali
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maen Abdelrahim
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Cockrell Center Phase 1 Unit, Cockrell Center for Advanced Therapeutics, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Milind M. Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - R. Mark Ghobrial
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim TH, Woo SM, Lee WJ, Chun JW, Cho YR, Kim BH, Koh YH, Kim SS, Oh ES, Lee DY, Lee SU, Suh YG, Moon SH, Park JW. Clinical Efficacy of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225561. [PMID: 36428654 PMCID: PMC9688899 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Forty-seven patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) who received proton beam therapy (PBT) were analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hypofractionated PBT in patients with inoperable or recurrent IHCC. The median prescribed dose of PBT was 63.3 GyE (range: 45-80 GyE) in 10 fractions, and the median duration of follow-up in all the patients was 18.3 months (range: 2.4-89.9 months). Disease progression occurred in 35 of the 47 (74.5%) patients; local, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic progression occurred in 5 (10.6%), 20 (42.6%), and 29 (61.7%) patients, respectively. The 2-year freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) rates, and median time of OS were 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.4-99.4%), 16.8% (95% CI, 4.3-29.3%), 42.7% (95% CI, 28.0-57.4%), and 21.9 months (95% CI, 16.2-28.3 months), respectively; grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in four (8.5%) patients. In selected patients with localized disease (no viable tumors outside of the PBT sites), the median time of OS was 33.8 months (95% CI, 5.4-62.3). These findings suggest that hypofractionated PBT is safe and could offer a high rate of FFLP and promising OS in patients with inoperable or recurrent IHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-920-1725; Fax: +82-31-920-0149
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Lee
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Jung Won Chun
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Yu Ri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Bo Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Young-Hwan Koh
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sang Soo Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Eun Sang Oh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Do Yeul Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Yang-Gun Suh
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Joong-Won Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Navin PJ, Olson MC, Mendiratta-Lala M, Hallemeier CL, Torbenson MS, Venkatesh SK. Imaging Features in the Liver after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Radiographics 2022; 42:2131-2148. [PMID: 36240077 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Historically, radiation therapy was not considered in treatment of liver tumors owing to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, development of highly conformed radiation treatments such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased use of radiation therapy in the liver. SBRT is indicated in treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors with outcomes comparable to those of other local therapies, especially in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After SBRT, imaging features of the tumor and surrounding background hepatic parenchyma demonstrate a predictable pattern immediately after treatment and during follow-up. The goals of SBRT are to deliver a lethal radiation dose to the targeted liver tumor and to minimize radiation dose to normal liver parenchyma and other adjacent organs. Evaluation of tumor response after SBRT centers on changes in size and enhancement; however, these changes are often delayed secondary to the underlying physiologic effects of radiation. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SBRT should allow better understanding of the typical imaging features in detection of tumor response and avoid misinterpretation from common pitfalls and atypical imaging findings. Imaging features of radiation-induced change in the surrounding liver parenchyma are characterized by a focal liver reaction that can potentially be mistaken for no response or recurrence of tumor. Knowledge of the pattern and chronology of this phenomenon may allay any uncertainty in assessment of tumor response. Other pitfalls related to fiducial marker placement or combination therapies are important to recognize. The authors review the basic principles of SBRT and illustrate post-SBRT imaging features of treated liver tumors and adjacent liver parenchyma with a focus on avoiding pitfalls in imaging evaluation of response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Navin
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Michael C Olson
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Christopher L Hallemeier
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Michael S Torbenson
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- From the Departments of Radiology (P.J.N., M.C.O., S.K.V.), Radiation Oncology (C.L.H.), and Pathology (M.S.T.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De B, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Manzar GS, Corrigan KL, Raghav KP, Lee SS, Tzeng CWD, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Koong AC, Das P, Javle M, Ludmir EB, Koay EJ. Ablative liver radiotherapy for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of care and survival in the United States. Cancer 2022; 128:2529-2539. [PMID: 35417569 PMCID: PMC9177808 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-institution studies have shown the oncologic benefit of ablative liver radiotherapy (A-RT) for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, adoption of A-RT across the United States and its associated outcomes are unknown. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Data Base for nonsurgically managed patients with ICC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018. Patients were labeled A-RT for receipt of biologically effective doses (BED10 ) ≥ 80.5 Gy and conventional RT (Conv-RT) for lower doses. Associations with A-RT use and overall survival were identified using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. RESULTS Of 27,571 patients, the most common treatments were chemotherapy without liver RT (45%), no chemotherapy or liver RT (42%), and liver RT ± chemotherapy (13%). Use of liver RT remained constant over time. Of 1112 patients receiving liver RT with known doses, RT was 73% Conv-RT (median BED10 , 53 Gy; median, 20 fractions) and 27% A-RT (median BED10 , 100 Gy; median, 5 fractions). Use of A-RT increased from 5% in 2004 to 48% in 2018 (Ptrend < .001). With a median follow-up of 52.3 months, median survival estimates for Conv-RT and A-RT were 12.8 and 23.7 months (P < .001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, stage III and IV disease correlated with a higher risk of death, whereas chemotherapy and A-RT correlated with a lower risk. CONCLUSIONS Although A-RT has been increasingly used, use of liver RT as a whole in the United States remained constant despite growing evidence supporting its use, suggesting continued unmet need. A-RT is associated with longer survival versus Conv-RT. LAY SUMMARY Bile duct cancer is a rare, deadly disease that often presents at advanced stages. Single-institution retrospective studies have demonstrated that use of high-dose radiotherapy may be associated with longer survival, but larger studies have not been conducted. We used a large, national cancer registry of patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 to show that liver radiotherapy use remains low in the United States, despite growing evidence that patients who receive it live longer. Furthermore, we showed that patients who received high-dose radiotherapy lived longer than those who received lower doses. Greater awareness of the benefits of liver radiotherapy is needed to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S. Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gohar S. Manzar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelsey L. Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal P.S. Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung S. Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Role of Hypofractionation in Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092271. [PMID: 35565400 PMCID: PMC9104796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypofractionated radiotherapy is an attractive approach for minimizing patient burden and treatment cost. Technological advancements in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivery and image guidance have resulted in improved targeting and conformality of the absorbed dose to the disease and a reduction in dose to healthy tissue. These advances in EBRT have led to an increasing adoption and interest in hypofractionation. Furthermore, for many treatment sites, proton beam therapy (PBT) provides an improved absorbed dose distribution compared to X-ray (photon) EBRT. In the past 10 years there has been a notable increase in reported clinical data involving hypofractionation with PBT, reflecting the interest in this treatment approach. This review will discuss the reported clinical data and radiobiology of hypofractionated PBT. Over 50 published manuscripts reporting clinical results involving hypofractionation and PBT were included in this review, ~90% of which were published since 2010. The most common treatment regions reported were prostate, lung and liver, making over 70% of the reported results. Many of the reported clinical data indicate that hypofractionated PBT can be well tolerated, however future clinical trials are still needed to determine the optimal fractionation regime.
Collapse
|
16
|
Aquina CT, Eskander MF, Pawlik TM. Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832405. [PMID: 35174097 PMCID: PMC8841620 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T. Aquina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- Digestive Health and Surgery Institute, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Mariam F. Eskander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Timothy M. Pawlik,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Krenzien F, Nevermann N, Krombholz A, Benzing C, Haber P, Fehrenbach U, Lurje G, Pelzer U, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M, Schöning W. Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020362. [PMID: 35053523 PMCID: PMC8773654 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This review discusses multimodality treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option and the central cornerstone of treatment. Adjuvant systemic treatment will be recommended after resection or in the palliative setting. Increasing knowledge of phenotypic subclassification and molecular profiling allows investigation of targeted therapies as (neo-)adjuvant treatment. High-dose brachytherapy, internal radiation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization are among the interventional treatment options being evaluated for unresectable iCC. Given the multiple options of multidisciplinary management, any treatment strategy should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment should be directed by a specialized treatment center. Abstract Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is distinguished as an entity from perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Recently, molecular profiling and histopathological features have allowed further classification. Due to the frequent delay in diagnosis, the prognosis for iCC remains poor despite major technical advances and multimodal therapeutic approaches. Liver resection represents the therapeutic backbone and only curative treatment option, with the functional residual capacity of the liver and oncologic radicality being deciding factors for postoperative and long-term oncological outcome. Furthermore, in selected cases and depending on national guidelines, liver transplantation may be a therapeutic option. Given the often advanced tumor stage at diagnosis or the potential for postoperative recurrence, locoregional therapies have become increasingly important. These strategies range from radiofrequency ablation to transarterial chemoembolization to selective internal radiation therapy and can be used in combination with liver resection. In addition, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies and immunotherapies based on molecular profiles can be applied. This review discusses multimodal treatment strategies for iCC and their differential use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Nevermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alina Krombholz
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Philipp Haber
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Clinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.K.); (C.B.); (P.H.); (G.L.); (J.P.); (M.S.); (W.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:580-587. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
19
|
De B, Abu-Gheida I, Patel A, Ng SSW, Zaid M, Thunshelle CP, Elganainy D, Corrigan KL, Rooney MK, Javle M, Raghav K, Lee SS, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Tran Cao HS, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Koong AC, Das P, Koay EJ. Benchmarking Outcomes after Ablative Radiotherapy for Molecularly Characterized Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1270. [PMID: 34945742 PMCID: PMC8703854 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11121270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We have previously shown that ablative radiotherapy (A-RT) with a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is associated with longer survival. Despite recent large-scale sequencing efforts in ICC, outcomes following RT based on genetic alterations have not been described. We reviewed records of 156 consecutive patients treated with A-RT for unresectable ICC from 2008 to 2020. For 114 patients (73%), next-generation sequencing provided molecular profiles. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine the associations with the outcomes. The median tumor size was 7.3 (range: 2.2-18.2) cm. The portal vein thrombus (PVT) was present in 10%. The RT median BED10 was 98 Gy (range: 81-144 Gy). The median (95% confidence interval) follow-up was 58 (42-104) months from diagnosis and 39 (33-74) months from RT. The median OS was 32 (29-35) months after diagnosis and 20 (16-24) months after RT. The one-year OS, LC, and intrahepatic DMFS were 73% (65-80%), 81% (73-87%), and 34% (26-42%). The most common mutations were in IDH1 (25%), TP53 (22%), ARID1A (19%), and FGFR2 (13%). Upon multivariable analysis, the factors associated with death included worse performance status, larger tumor, metastatic disease, higher CA 19-9, PVT, satellitosis, and IDH1 and PIK3CA mutations. TP53 mutation was associated with local failure. Further investigation into the prognostic value of individual mutations and combinations thereof is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Ibrahim Abu-Gheida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Aashini Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Sylvia S. W. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Mohamed Zaid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Connor P. Thunshelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Dalia Elganainy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Kelsey L. Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Michael K. Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Sunyoung S. Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Hop S. Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roberts HJ, Wo JY. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors: An effective liver-directed therapy in the toolbox. Cancer 2021; 128:956-965. [PMID: 34847255 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of radiation for primary liver cancers has historically been limited because of the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Treatment fields have become more conformal because of several technical advances, and this has allowed for dose escalation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, is now able to safely treat liver tumors to ablative doses while sparing functional liver parenchyma by using highly conformal therapy. Several retrospective and small prospective studies have examined the use of SBRT for liver cancers; however, there is a lack of well-powered randomized studies to definitively guide management in these settings. Recent advances in systemic therapy for primary liver cancers have improved outcomes; however, the optimal selection criteria for SBRT as a local therapy remain unclear among other liver-directed options such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah J Roberts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bekki Y, Von Ahrens D, Takahashi H, Schwartz M, Gunasekaran G. Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma - Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:776863. [PMID: 34746017 PMCID: PMC8567135 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.776863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second-most common primary liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. While surgical resection with negative margin is the only curative treatment, ICC has very high rate of recurrence, up to 60-70% after curative resection. We reviewed the current data available on risk factors for ICC recurrence, recurrence pattern (location and timing), treatment options, and future directions. The risk factors for recurrence include elevated preoperative CA19-9, presence of liver cirrhosis, nodal metastasis, positive margins, and vascular invasion. Understanding different recurrence patterns, timing course, and risk factors for early recurrence is important to tailor postoperative surveillance and select treatment strategies including systemic or locoregional therapy. Re-resection can be considered for a selected patient population at experienced centers, and can yield long-term survival. ICC remains a dismal disease given the high likelihood of recurrence. Advances in our understanding of the genomic landscape of ICC are beginning to identify targetable alterations in ICC in subsets of patients that allow for personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Bekki
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dagny Von Ahrens
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hideo Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY, United States
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ganesh Gunasekaran
- Division of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yu Q, Liu C, Pillai A, Ahmed O. Twenty Years of Radiation Therapy of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarinoma: Internal or External? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Liver Cancer 2021; 10:433-450. [PMID: 34721506 PMCID: PMC8527917 DOI: 10.1159/000516880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and selective-internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are implemented to treat unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EBRT and SIRT in managing iCCA through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed and Cochrane database were queried to search for studies published from January 2000 toJune 2020 without language restrictions. Median survival time, overall survival, and radiological response were extracted. Secondary outcomes such as complication rates, predictors of survival, and downstage to surgery were pooled. Patient-level survival data were obtained to generate Kaplan-Meier survival graph. Pooled outcomes were analyzed with a random-effect model. RESULTS Twenty-nine and 20 studies including 732 and 443 patients from the SIRT and EBRT groups were included in the present study. From initial radiation treatment, the median survival time for patients who underwent SIRT and EBRT were 12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8-14.6) and 13.6 (95% CI: 11.1-16.0) months, respectively. As first-line therapy, the median survival time was 36.1 (95% CI: 20.6-39.5) months for SIRT and 11.0 (95% CI: 9.3-13.6) months for EBRT. Both radiation modalities were effective in downstaging initially unresectable iCCA to surgery (SIRT: 30.5%; EBRT: 18.3%). Patients in the SIRT group encountered more post-embolization abdominal pain (6.9 vs. 2.2%), ulcer (1.0 vs. 0.5%), nausea (1.6 vs. 0.7%), anorexia (5.9 vs. 0%), thrombocytopenia (7.3 vs. 6.0%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.2 vs. 2.1%), and hypoalbuminemia (13.2 vs. 3.3%), whereas EBRT was associated with higher rates of anemia (0.6 vs. 7.5%) and neutropenia (6.5 vs. 11.0%). CONCLUSIONS Both EBRT and SIRT were safe and effective in treating unresectable iCCA. However, available evidence was highly heterogeneous regarding patient population, limiting fair comparison between 2 radiation modalities. Future high-quality comparative studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA,*Qian Yu, yuqian1006*gmail.com
| | - Chenyu Liu
- Ben May Department of Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bisello S, Camilletti AC, Bertini F, Buwenge M, Arcelli A, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Mattiucci G, Autorino R, Brandi G, Strigari L, Cammelli S, Morganti AG. Stereotactic radiotherapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:152. [PMID: 34141431 PMCID: PMC8204140 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Among biliary tract cancers, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has different characteristics compared with those in other sites. Current guidelines suggest several treatment options for ICC, including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, the role of SBRT in locally advanced ICC is unclear. The aim of the present study was to present a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of SBRT in ICC. A systematic review based on the PRISMA methodology was performed. Only papers reporting outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) after SBRT in inoperable patients with ICC were included. Secondary aims were local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity. Six papers (145 patients) were included in the present analysis. SBRT was frequently used as a salvage treatment, since 28.6-66.7% of patients received previous systemic or local treatments. The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy delivered in 3-5 fractions. The median follow-up was 16 months, and median OS time was 14 months (range, 10-48 months). In one of the included studies, SBRT was significantly superior in terms of OS compared with both chemoradiation and trans-arterial-radio-embolization. The 1-year LC rate was 85% in one study, and 1-year PFS rates were 50 and 68% in two studies, respectively. Toxicity was generally not reported in detail or was reported including other sites of biliary cancers. Overall, limited evidence was available on the efficacy of SBRT in ICC, which should be further investigated in prospective studies with a larger number of patients. However, based on the available data, SBRT seems to produce similar results compared with other ICC treatments, with the advantage of being a very short and non-invasive therapy. Therefore, SBRT should be considered in selected patients with ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Bisello
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Camilletti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Bertini
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra Arcelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physic Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Mattiucci
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, I-00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Autorino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, I-00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shindoh J. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: A Potential Option for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:983-984. [PMID: 31848809 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08145-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Shindoh
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smart AC, Wo JY. ASO Author Reflections: High-Dose Radiation Offers Local Control for Inoperable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1130-1131. [PMID: 31858298 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08144-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia C Smart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|