Same Day Discharges Among Elderly Mastectomy Patients: A Single Institution Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Same-day mastectomy is safe and high value. However, patients ≥ 65 years are less likely to be discharged compared with younger patients. Our aim was to implement a protocol to increase the rate of elderly same-day discharge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were screened by 5-factor modified frailty index and notification of frailty status was sent to surgeons. Patients with moderate-to-high frailty were encouraged to have prehabilitation. Chart review collected demographic/clinicopathologic variables, length of stay, and complications. The primary endpoint was same-day discharge, and sample size determination was 50 patients. Our discharge rate was compared with our historic rate (18.8% March 2022 to February 2023) by Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

From March 2023 to January 2024, 306 patients aged ≥ 65 years were screened. Overall, 55 patients underwent a total of 57 mastectomies (18.6%). Median age was 72 years (range: 65-99). Frailty scores ranged from 0 to 4. In total, 11 patients (19.3%) had a score of zero, 41 (71.9%) scored 1 or 2, and 5 patients (8.8%) scored 3 or 4. Seven patients were referred to geriatric oncology for prehabilitation: one non-frail, four with low frailty, and two with moderate frailty. The median length of stay (LOS) was 0 days (range: 0-21). Thirty-two mastectomies had same-day discharge (56.1%), significantly higher than historic data (P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

We increased same-day discharges for patients ≥ 65 years from 18.8% to 56.1%. This protocol included a simple frailty screening and a weekly email. Future directions include increasing the proportion of patients who receive geriatric oncology prehabilitation referrals and evaluating patient-reported outcomes.

Effect of erector spinae plane block and thoracic epidural anesthesia on hospital length of stay and postoperative opioid use after mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Adequate postoperative pain control is essential after mastectomy. This study compares the influence of 2 regional analgesia techniques on length of stay and opioid use to systemic analgesia alone.

METHODS

Patients treated with mastectomy from 2014 to 2020 were stratified according to perioperative analgesic modality (systemic analgesia versus thoracic epidural anesthesia or erector spinae plane block). Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared. Outcome variables included postoperative anesthesia unit and hospital length of stay, postoperative day 1 and 2 discharge rates, and inpatient opioid use (in oral milligram morphine equivalents).

RESULTS

Of 316 patients, 171 received systemic analgesia, 72 thoracic epidural anesthesia, and 73 erector spinae plane block. On univariate analysis, there were significant differences in age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bilateral surgery, immediate reconstruction, and Her2 positivity rates. Thoracic epidural anesthesia had the longest hospital length of stay, and erector spinae plane block the shortest, compared with systemic analgesia (52.1 vs 28 vs 30.6 hours, P < .0001). Postoperative day 1 discharge was more likely with erector spinae plane block than systemic analgesia and less likely with thoracic epidural anesthesia (89% vs 68.4% vs 30.6%, P < .0001). Erector spinae plane block required significantly less milligram morphine equivalents than thoracic epidural anesthesia or systemic analgesia on postoperative day 1 (10 vs 18.75 vs 20 milligram morphine equivalents, P < .0009), but no differences on postoperative day 2 (23.5 vs 20 vs 25 milligram morphine equivalents, P = .84). Total hospital opioid use was significantly lower for erector spinae plane block than thoracic epidural anesthesia or systemic analgesia (24 vs 32.3 vs 32 milligram morphine equivalents, P = .024). On multivariate analysis, thoracic epidural anesthesia was associated with significantly longer length of stay, whereas neither thoracic epidural anesthesia nor erector spinae plane block was associated with decreased opioid use.

CONCLUSION

Regional analgesia is not significantly associated with decreased opioid use or hospital length of stay.

Improving sustainability and mitigating the environmental impact of anaesthesia and surgery along the perioperative journey: a narrative review

Climate change, environmental degradation, and biodiversity loss are adversely affecting human health and exacerbating existing inequities, intensifying pressures on already strained health systems. Paradoxically, healthcare is a high-polluting industry, responsible for 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions and a similar proportion of air pollutants. Perioperative services are among the most resource-intensive healthcare services and are responsible for some unique pollutants. Opportunities exist to mitigate pollution throughout the entire continuum of perioperative care, including those that occur upstream of the operating room in the process of patient selection and optimisation, delivery of anaesthesia and surgery, and the postoperative recovery period. Within a patient-centred, holistic approach, clinicians can advocate for healthy public policies that modify the determinants of surgical illness, can engage in shared decision-making to ensure appropriate clinical decisions, and can be stewards of healthcare resources. Innovation and collaboration are required to redesign clinical care pathways and processes, optimise logistical systems, and address facility emissions. The results will extend beyond the reduction of public health damages from healthcare pollution to the provision of higher value, higher quality, patient-centred care.

National Patterns of Hospital Admission Versus Home Recovery Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

We examined national patterns of care and perioperative outcomes for women after mastectomy, comparing home recovery (HR) with hospital admission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using Martketscan data (2017-2019), women ≥ 18 years old who underwent mastectomy ± reconstruction were identified and classified as either home recovery (same calendar day discharge) or hospital admission (stays > 1 calendar day). Comorbidities and receipt of chemo/immunotherapy 6 months prior to surgery and post-surgical 30-day complications were measured. Logistic regression calculated the odds of any complication by encounter type, adjusting for age, accompanying lymph node (LN) procedure, reconstruction, neoadjuvant chemo- and/or immunotherapy, and select comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 11,789 mastectomy encounters (N = 11,659 women), 4751 (40%) cases utilized HR while 7038 (60%) had hospital admission. HR patients were older (53.6 years old vs. 51.8 years old) with lower rates of reconstruction (60.2 vs. 74.5%, p < 0.001). Rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.6 vs. 20.9%, p = 0.099) and immunotherapy (3.6 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.445) were similar between groups. Complication rates were lower among HR patients with fewer postoperative hematomas (0.6 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001) and decreased wound complications (8.5 vs. 9.8%, p = 0.019). In a multivariable analysis, the odds of any complication were approximately 20% lower for HR patients compared with admission patients (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91, p < 0.001). Unplanned emergency room visits were similar between groups (6.7 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.374); yet fewer hospital re-admissions (2.5 vs. 3.5%, p = 0.003) occurred in women recovering at home.

CONCLUSION

HR is a safe option compared with in-hospital admission for clinically appropriate women after mastectomy as they are less likely to experience postoperative complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or hospitalization.

Factors Predicting Overnight Admission after Same-Day Mastectomy Protocol and Associated Financial Implications

BACKGROUND

Same-day mastectomy (SDM) protocols have been shown to be safe, and their use increased up to 4-fold compared with prepandemic rates. We sought to identify factors that predict overnight patient admission and evaluate the associated cost of care.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing mastectomy from March 2020 to April 2022 were analyzed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, perioperative factors, 30-day complication, fixed and variable cost, and contribution margin were compared between those who underwent SDM vs those who required overnight admission after mastectomy (OAM).

RESULTS

Of a total of 183 patients with planned SDM, 104 (57%) had SDM and 79 (43%) had OAM. Both groups had similar demographic, tumor, and operative characteristics. Patients who required OAM were more likely to be preoperative opioid users (p = 0.002), have higher American Society of Anesthesiology class (p = 0.028), and more likely to have procedure start time (PST) after 12:00 pm (49% vs 33%, p = 0.033). The rates of 30-day unplanned postoperative events were similar between SDM and OAM. Preoperative opioid user (odds ratio [OR] 3.62, 95% CI 1.56 to 8.40), postanesthesia care unit length of stay greater than 1 hour (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.37), and PST after 12:00 pm (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.51) were independent predictors of OAM on multivariate analysis. Both fixed ($5,545 vs $4,909, p = 0.03) and variable costs ($6,426 vs $4,909, p = 0.03) were higher for OAM compared with SDM. Contribution margin was not significantly different between the 2 groups (-$431 SDM vs -$734 OAM, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative opioid use, American Society of Anesthesiology class, longer postanesthesia care unit length of stay, and PST after noon predict a higher likelihood of admission after planned SDM. OAM translated to higher cost but not to decreased profit for the hospital.

Outpatient surgery benchmarks and practice variation patterns: case controlled study

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous potential benefits of outpatient surgery, there is currently a lack of national benchmarking data available for hospitals and surgeons to compare their own outcomes as they transition toward outpatient surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent 14 common general surgery operations from 2016 to 2020 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Operations were selected based on frequency and the ability to be performed both inpatient and outpatient. Postoperative complications and readmissions were compared between patients who underwent inpatient vs outpatient surgery. After adjusting for patient comorbidities, multivariable models assessed the effect of patient characteristics on the odds of experiencing postoperative complications. A separate multi-institutional study of 21 affiliated hospitals assessed practice variation.

RESULTS

In 13 of the 14 studied procedures, complications were lower for patients who were selected for outpatient surgery (all P <0.01); minimally invasive (MIS) adrenalectomy showed no difference ( P =0.61). Multivariable analysis confirmed these findings; the odds of experiencing any adverse events were lower following outpatient surgery in all operations but MIS adrenalectomy (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.47-2.02). Analysis of institutional practices demonstrated variation in the rate of outpatient surgery in certain breast, endocrine, and hernia repair operations.

CONCLUSIONS

Institutional practice patterns may explain the national variation in the rate of outpatient surgery. While the present data does not support the adoption of outpatient surgery to less optimal candidates, addressing unexplained practice variations could result in improved utilization of outpatient surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) With Exparel in Tissue Expander-based Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been widely shown to yield positive outcomes, including in plastic surgery. Our group has previously validated ERAS in our deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction population.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether the ERAS protocol and addition of liposomal bupivacaine affected patient outcomes at the time of mastectomy and first-stage tissue expander reconstruction.

METHODS

All patients treated between July 2021 and May 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. The ERAS protocol was implemented in December 2021. Two patient groups were compared: pre-ERAS and ERAS. The ERAS protocol included use of liposomal bupivacaine in the pectoralis nerve block 1/2 planes. Primary outcomes were observed with postoperative length of stay and hospital narcotic use.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were analyzed in this cohort. The pre-ERAS group was composed of 41 patients, the ERAS group was composed of 83 patients. Postoperative length of stay was significantly reduced in the ERAS group (1.7 pre-ERAS vs 1.1 ERAS, P = .0004). When looking at morphine equivalents during the hospital stay, the degree of narcotics in the recovery room was relatively similar. Average PACU pain morphine equivalents were 6.1 pre-ERAS vs 7.1 ERAS (P = .406). However, total hospital morphine equivalents were significantly lower in the ERAS group (65.0 pre-ERAS vs 26.2 ERAS, P = <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol with liposomal bupivacaine pectoralis 1/2 nerve blocks decreased postoperative opioid consumption and hospital length of stay in mastectomy patients undergoing tissue expander-based reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Overnight to Outpatient: A Single Institution's Experience With Mastectomy and Reconstruction Before and After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE

Minimizing resource use while optimizing patient outcomes has become an ever-growing component in modern healthcare, especially in the era of COVID-19. One essential component of this is deciding whether patients need hospital admission following elective procedures. The aim of this study is to investigate operative factors and patient outcomes when mastectomies with or without reconstruction are performed as ambulatory procedures versus planned inpatient admissions.

METHODS

Patient charts for those undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed ranging from March 2019 until February 2021. Factors such as demographic information, operative type, operating room time, cancer stage, total stay time in the medical environment, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patient charts were reviewed, 46 from before the COVID-19 pandemic and 43 from after the start of the pandemic. No differences were observed in demographic factors between the 2 groups. After surgical cases resumed a significant proportion, 79%, of mastectomies with or without reconstruction were performed in the ambulatory center, versus just 2% pre-COVID-19. Similarly, of all of these cases performed, only 19% resulted in hospital admission versus the previous rate of 100% (P < 0.00001). Together, these changes resulted in a significant reduction in length of stay of 39.77 ± 19.2 hours pre-COVID-19 versus 14.81 ± 18.4 hours afterward (P < 0.00001). Unfortunately, a higher number of patients who received surgery after the start of the pandemic elected to forego immediate reconstruction 49% versus 72% (P = 0.032). Most importantly, there were no observable differences found in 7-day readmission, reoperation, or emergency department visit between groups. There was also no difference in 30-day complication rate between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy with or without reconstruction can be safely performed in the ambulatory setting without additional risk of complications or negative patient factors. This divergence from traditional the protocol of inpatient overnight admission may contribute positively toward patient comfort, minimize the use of healthcare costs and resources, and allow for increased scheduling flexibility for patient and provider alike.

Translating Evidence into Practice: A Review of Clinical Practice and Outcomes following the Adoption of an Early Post-Mastectomy Discharge Protocol in a Nigerian Hospital

Introduction

In Nigeria, mastectomy is the most common surgical treatment for breast cancer. Patients are often kept on admission for days until wound drains are removed. An early discharge programme was piloted in a Nigerian hospital in 2017 with very satisfactory outcomes. The impact of this evidence on clinical practice and surgical outcomes was evaluated over 5 years.

Methods

From a prospectively maintained institutional database, the details of patients who underwent mastectomy between 2018 and 2022 were obtained. The duration of post-operative stay was obtained and analysed per year to determine the trend. Post-operative surgical complications such as seroma, haematoma, flap necrosis, and surgical site infection were analysed.

Results

Overall, 147 patients (69%) had early discharge during the review period. Twenty-two patients (10.3%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery, 61 patients (28.6%) were discharged within 24-48 h, and 64 patients (30%) were discharged between 48 and 72 h. There was a steady increase in the adoption of the early discharge protocol over time with a 50% adoption rate in 2018 and 95% in 2022. The mean duration of hospital stay declined steadily from 3.9 days in 2018 to 2.2 days in 2022. Early discharge did not result in any compromise to post-operative outcomes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the sustainability of early post-mastectomy discharge in a resource-limited setting with very satisfactory outcomes. It also provides a unique example of how locally generated evidence can guide local practice. We consider these findings generalisable in other Nigerian hospitals and low- and middle-income countries with similar contexts.

Same day discharge following mastectomy and immediate tissue expander reconstruction: The effect of patient expectations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Within, we compare the short-term outcomes of patients receiving same day mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction for those discharged on postoperative day one versus those discharged immediately following surgery to explore the safety, efficacy, and potential impact on hospital processes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction from March 2019 to March 2021. Patients were stratified into two cohorts; observation overnight (OBS), and discharge on same day of surgery (DC).

RESULTS

In total, 153 patients underwent 256 mastectomies with immediate TE reconstruction. All patients were female and the mean age was 48 years old. The DC cohort contained 71 patients (125 mastectomies) and there were 82 patients (131 mastectomies) within the OBS cohort. On average the DC cohort had a lower BMI than the OBS group (mean ± SD; DC 26.8 kg/m2 ± 5.3 kg/m2, OBS 28.7 kg/m2 ± 6.1 kg/m2, p = 0.05), the DC cohort had higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy (DC 40.1%, OBS 23.2%, p = 0.02), and were more likely to undergo bilateral TE reconstruction (DC 76%, OBS 60%, p = 0.03) than the OBS group. No differences were observed between cohorts in complication rates regarding primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that it is safe and effective within the immediate 7-day post-operative period to immediately discharge patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction. Additionally, alteration of patient management practices can have a profound impact on the operational flow within hospitals.

Enhanced recovery after surgery for oncological breast surgery reduces length of stay in a resource limited setting

BACKGROUND

Early recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in breast surgery optimizes resources and reduces healthcare costs by facilitating early discharges. These protocols are well established in tertiary centres, but not commonly adopted in regional centres. ERAS implementation potentially impacts smaller hospitals significantly, where resources are limited and persistent bed shortages with mounting waitlist pressures exist. Our study evaluates the feasibility of early discharge with the application of our ERAS protocol to mastectomies in a resource-constrained and rural setting.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomies with or without reconstruction between January 2017 and July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. From January 2022, we implemented a standardized ERAS protocol for patients undergoing mastectomy. This incorporated a combination of pre-, intra- and post-operative elements to enhance patient readiness for discharge. Our study compared these patients (post-ERAS group) with the outcomes of mastectomies performed prior to January 2022 (pre-ERAS group).

RESULTS

104 patients were identified. In the post-ERAS group, 74.4% were discharged within 24 h compared to 23.1% in the pre-ERAS group. Length of stay was reduced from 2.26 to 1.42 days. There were no differences in unplanned clinician reviews or early representation to the emergency department between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the length of stay without increased complications can be achieved in a resource-limited environment with our protocolized ERAS principals. Our protocol has been instrumental in allowing safe discharges within 24 h. Other regional centres may benefit in adopting strategies implemented by us for their own ERAS protocols in breast cancer surgery.

Remote Symptom Monitoring with Clinical Alerts Following Mastectomy: Do Early Symptoms Predict 30-Day Surgical Complications

BACKGROUND

Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for real-time remote symptom monitoring facilitate early recognition of postoperative complications. We sought to determine whether remote, electronic, patient-reported symptom-monitoring with Recovery Tracker predicts 30-day readmission or reoperation in outpatient mastectomy patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent outpatient (< 24-h stay) mastectomy with or without reconstruction from April 2017 to January 2022 and who received the Recovery Tracker on Days 1-10 postoperatively. Of 5,130 patients, 3,888 met the inclusion criteria (2,880 mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and 1,008 mastectomy only). We focused on symptoms concerning for surgical complications and assessed if symptoms reaching prespecified alert levels-prompting a nursing call-predicted risk of 30-day readmission or reoperation.

RESULTS

Daily Recovery Tracker response rates ranged from 45% to 70%. Overall, 1,461 of 3,888 patients (38%) triggered at least one alert. Most red (urgent) alerts were triggered by pain and fever; most yellow (less urgent) alerts were triggered by wound redness and pain severity. The 30-day readmission and reoperation rates were low at 3.8% and 2.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between symptom alerts and 30-day reoperation or readmission, and a clinically relevant increase in risk can be excluded (odds ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.46; p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction in the ambulatory setting have a low burden of concerning symptoms, even in the first few days after surgery. Patients can be reassured that symptoms that do present resolve quickly thereafter.

Acceptance of outpatient enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS©) protocols for implant-based breast reconstruction nudged on by the COVID-19 pandemic

We retrospectively identified 295 women undergoing outpatient implant breast reconstruction (IBR) who received standardized ERAS care pre-pandemic (PP; April 2018-March 2020) and during the pandemic (DP; April 2020-March 2022). The majority of IBR was completed as outpatient surgeries DP versus PP (73% versus 38%, p < 0.001). Immediate IBR increased DP versus PP (p < 0.001). Preoperative ERAS© order sets were used 54% of the time. Lack of ERAS© order set use was associated with unplanned admissions (55.3% versus 44.7%, p = 0.02). COVID-19 changed health care and nudged IBR to outpatient procedures. With ERAS© recommendations, IBR can be safely and effectively transitioned to outpatient settings.

A novel technique of reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: medium-term oncological safety outcomes and feasibility of 24-h discharge for breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Due to the short operation time and no need for special instruments, reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-E-NSM) with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DIBR) has been rapidly becoming popular in the last three years. However, there has yet to be an evaluation of its oncologic safety or the feasibility of discharging patients within 24 h.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, individuals diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer between May 2020 and April 2022 who underwent traditional open mastectomy or R-E-NSM with DIBR were included. Follow-up started on the date of surgery and ended in December 2023. Data, including demographics, tumour characteristics, medium-term oncological outcomes, and postoperative complications, were collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias.

RESULTS

This study included 1679 patients [median (IQR) age, 50 [44-57) years]. Of these, 344 patients underwent R-E-NSM with DIBR (RE-R group), and 1335 patients underwent traditional open mastectomy (TOM group). The median [IQR] follow-up time was 30 [24-36] months [29 (23-33) months in the RE-R group and 30([24-36) months in the TOM group]. Regarding before or after PSM, the P value of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS, 0.910 and 0.450), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS, 0.780 and 0.620), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 0.061 and 0.130), overall survival (OS, 0.260 and 0.620), disease-free survival (DFS, 0.120 and 0.330) were not significantly different between the RE-R group and the TOM group. The 3y-LRFS and 3y-DFS rates were 99.0% and 97.1% for the RE-R group and 99.5% and 95.3% for the TOM group, respectively. The rates of any complications and major complications were not significantly different between the RE-R patients who were discharged within 24 h and the RE-R patients who were not discharged within 24 h ( P =0.290, P =0.665, respectively) or the TOM patients who were discharged within 24 h ( P  =0.133, P =0.136, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

R-E-NSM with DIBR is an innovative oncologic surgical procedure that not only improves cosmetic outcomes but also ensures reliable oncologic safety and fewer complications, enabling patients to be safely discharged within 24 h. A long-term prospective multicenter assessment will be supporting.

Safety and factors affecting same-day discharge following mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy are often admitted overnight. In 2020, our institution implemented a protocol change to discharge clinically stable patients immediately. In this study, we examine the safety of same-day discharge following mastectomy and reconstruction.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included female adults undergoing mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction from August 2019 to January 2020, before implementation of the same-day discharge protocol, and from March 2020 to September 2021, after the protocol implementation. Independent t-test and chi-square analysis was conducted to examine statistical differences.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-five patients were included. Forty-two patients underwent reconstruction before the protocol change (Group 1) and 243 patients underwent reconstruction after the protocol change (Group 2). Group 2 had a greater percentage of prepectoral implant placement. There was no difference in demographics, complications, readmission, or reoperation. Within Group 2, 157 patients were discharged the same day (Group 2a) and 88 patients required overnight admission (Group 2b). Group 2b had higher body mass index, higher percentage of bilateral mastectomy, and larger mastectomy weights. Despite no differences in complications, Group 2b exhibited higher rates of requiring intravenous antibiotics and reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients may be safely discharged the same day following mastectomy and alloplastic reconstruction without an increase in complications.

Efficacy of Electronic Reminders in Increasing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Use During Major Breast Surgery: Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient-centered, evidence-based guidelines for peri-, intra-, and postoperative management of surgical candidates that aim to decrease operative complications and facilitate recovery after surgery. Anesthesia providers can use these protocols to guide decision-making and standardize aspects of their anesthetic plan in the operating room.

OBJECTIVE

Research across multiple disciplines has demonstrated that clinical decision support systems have the potential to improve protocol adherence by reminding providers about departmental policies and protocols via notifications. There remains a gap in the literature about whether clinical decision support systems can improve patient outcomes by improving anesthesia providers' adherence to protocols. Our hypothesis is that the implementation of an electronic notification system to anesthesia providers the day prior to scheduled breast surgeries will increase the use of the already existing but underused ERAS protocols.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective cohort study conducted between October 2017 and August 2018 at an urban academic medical center. After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, anesthesia providers assigned to major breast surgery cases were identified. Patient data were collected pre- and postimplementation of an electronic notification system that sent the anesthesia providers an email reminder of the ERAS breast protocol the night before scheduled surgeries. Each patient's record was then reviewed to assess the frequency of adherence to the various ERAS protocol elements.

RESULTS

Implementation of an electronic notification significantly improved overall protocol adherence and several preoperative markers of ERAS protocol adherence. Protocol adherence increased from 16% (n=14) to 44% (n=44; P<.001), preoperative administration of oral gabapentin (600 mg) increased from 13% (n=11) to 43% (n=43; P<.001), and oral celebrex (400 mg) use increased from 16% (n=14) to 35% (n=35; P=.006). There were no statistically significant differences in the use of scopolamine transdermal patch (P=.05), ketamine (P=.35), and oral acetaminophen (P=.31) between the groups. Secondary outcomes such as intraoperative and postoperative morphine equivalent administered, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, postoperative pain scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not show statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study examines whether sending automated notifications to anesthesia providers increases the use of ERAS protocols in a single academic medical center. Our analysis exhibited statistically significant increases in overall protocol adherence but failed to show significant differences in secondary outcome measures. Despite the lack of a statistically significant difference in secondary postoperative outcomes, our analysis contributes to the limited literature on the relationship between using push notifications and clinical decision support in guiding perioperative decision-making. A variety of techniques can be implemented, including technological solutions such as automated notifications to providers, to improve awareness and adherence to ERAS protocols.

A Randomized Single-Blinded Study Comparing Preoperative with Post-Mastectomy PECS Block for Post-operative Pain Management in Bilateral Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided pectoralis muscle blocks (PECS I/II) are well established for postoperative pain control after mastectomy with reconstruction. However, optimal timing is unclear. We conducted a randomized controlled single-blinded single-institution trial comparing outcomes of block performed pre-incision versus post-mastectomy.

METHOD

Patients with breast cancer undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate expander/implant reconstruction were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided PECS I/II either pre-incision (PreM, n = 17) or post-mastectomy and before reconstruction (PostM, n = 17). The primary outcome was the average pain score using the Numerical Rating Score during post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and inpatient stay, with the study powered to detect a difference in mean pain score of 2. Secondary outcomes included mean pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 2, 3, 7, 14, 90, and 180; pain catastrophizing scores; narcotic requirements; PACU/inpatient length of stay; block procedure time; and complications.

RESULT

No significant differences between the two groups were noted in average pain score during PACU (p = 0.57) and 24-h inpatient stay (p = 0.33), in the 2 weeks after surgery at rest (p = 0.90) or during movement (p = 0.30), or at POD 90 and 180 at rest (p = 0.42) or during movement (p = 0.31). Median duration of block procedure (PreM 7 min versus PostM 6 min, p = 0.21) did not differ. Median PACU and inpatient length of stay were the same in each group. Inpatient narcotic requirements were similar, as were length of stay and post-surgical complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided PECS I/II block administered by surgeons following mastectomy had similar outcomes to preoperative blocks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with Clinical Research Information Service (NCT03653988).

Decreasing length of stay in breast reconstruction patients: A national analysis of 2019-2020

BACKGROUND

The effects of COVID-19 on breast reconstruction included shifts toward alloplastic reconstruction methods to preserve hospital resources and minimize COVID exposures. We examined the effects of COVID-19 on breast reconstruction hospital length of stay (LOS) and subsequent early postoperative complication rates.

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we examined female patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction from 2019 to 2020. We compared postoperative complications across 2019-2020 for alloplastic and autologous reconstruction patients. We further performed subanalysis of 2020 patients based on LOS.

RESULTS

Both alloplastic and autologous reconstruction patients had shorter inpatient stays. Regarding the alloplastic 2019 versus 2020 cohorts, complication rates did not differ (p > 0.05 in all cases). Alloplastic patients in 2020 with longer LOS had more unplanned reoperations (p < 0.001). Regarding autologous patients in 2019 versus 2020, the only complication increasing from 2019 to 2020 was deep surgical site infection (SSI) (2.0% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.024). Autologous patients in 2020 with longer LOS had more unplanned reoperations (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In 2020, hospital LOS decreased for all breast reconstruction patients with no complication differences in alloplastic patients and a slight increase in SSIs in autologous patients. Shorter LOS may lead to improved satisfaction and lower healthcare costs with low complication risk, and future research should examine the potential relationship between LOS and these outcomes.

Perioperative protocols in ambulatory breast reconstruction: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have successfully employed perioperative protocols and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols to promote and increase the range of breast reconstruction procedures performed in ambulatory settings. This systematic review aims to identify the common perioperative protocol items associated with successful ambulatory breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane) was conducted. Studies that described the perioperative care protocol for postmastectomy breast reconstruction in ambulatory settings (discharge within 24 h) were included. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. Risk of bias was assessed with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality tool. The perioperative protocol details, type of reconstruction, information regarding patient selection criteria, successful discharge rates, and complication rates were extracted.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in the systematic review, with 1484 patients undergoing ambulatory breast reconstruction with a well-defined perioperative protocol. Sixteen perioperative items were identified. The most discussed items were preoperative counseling (11/12), preoperative and intraoperative multimodal analgesia (11/12), and postoperative analgesia (10/12). Our recommendation includes two new items and seven modified items compared to previous ERAS guidelines. Overall, the mean number of items was 9.22 in same-day discharge and 6.75 in 24-h discharge (P = 0.169). 78.4% of the patients (1123 of 1433) were successfully discharged within 24 h. No studies identified an increase in readmission or complications with ambulatory discharge.

CONCLUSION

Sixteen core items were defined for a successful perioperative ERAS protocol for 24-h discharge breast reconstruction. Implementing perioperative protocols can facilitate under-24-h discharge for alloplastic and autologous surgery.

Incorporating Value-Based Decisions in Breast Cancer Treatment Algorithms

Given the excellent prognosis and availability of evidence-based treatment, patients with early-stage breast cancer are at risk of overtreatment. In this review, we summarize key opportunities to incorporate value-based decisions to optimize the delivery of high-value treatment across the breast cancer care continuum.

Inpatient versus Outpatient Immediate Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: Recent Trends, Outcomes, and Safety

Background

Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction was traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure. Despite several reports in the literature demonstrating comparable safety outcomes, there remains hesitancy to accept breast reconstruction performed as an outpatient procedure.

Methods

A retrospective review of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2014 to 2018 was utilized to evaluate recent trends and 30-day postoperative complication rates for inpatient versus outpatient immediate prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable groups.

Results

During the study period, 33,587 patients underwent immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction. Of those, 67.5% of patients were discharged within 24 hours, and 32.4% of patients had a hospital stay of more than 24 hours. Immediate alloplastic reconstruction had an overall growth rate of 16.9% from 2014 to 2018. After propensity score matching, intraoperative variables that correlated with significantly increased inpatient status included increased work relative value units (16.3 ± 2.3 versus 16.2 ± 2.6; P < 0.001), longer operative times (228 ± 86 versus 206 ± 77; P < 0.001), and bilateral procedure (44.0% versus 43.5%; P < 0.001). There were higher rates of pulmonary embolism, wound dehiscence, urinary tract infection, transfusions, sepsis, readmissions, and reoperations in the group with the longer hospital stay.

Conclusion

Based on increased complication rates and costs in the inpatient setting, we propose outpatient reconstructive surgery as a safe and cost-effective alternative for immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction.

Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23 h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.

Value of Ambulatory Modified Radical Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) still is largely performed in inpatient settings. This study sought to determine the value (expenditures and complications) of ambulatory MRM.

METHODS

Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state databases from 2016 were queried for patients who underwent MRM. The study examined rates of 30-day readmission for surgical-site infection (SSI) or hematoma, charges by index care setting, and predictors of 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Overall, 8090 patients underwent MRM: 5113 (63 %) inpatient and 2977 (37 %) ambulatory patients. Compared with the patients who underwent inpatient MRM, those who underwent ambulatory MRM were older (61 vs. 59 years), more often white (66 % vs. 57 %), in the lowest income quartile (28 % vs. 21 %), insured by Medicare (43 % vs. 33 %) and residents in a small metro area (6 % vs. 4 %) (all p < 0.01). Of the 5113 patients treated as inpatients, 126 (2.5 %) were readmitted, whereas 50 (1.7 %) of the ambulatory patients were readmitted (p = 0.02). The adjusted charge for inpatient MRM without readmission was $113,878 (range, $107,355-120,402) compared with $94,463 (range, $86,021-102,907) for ambulatory MRM, and the charge for inpatient MRM requiring readmission was $159,355 (range, $147,142-171,568) compared with $139,940 (range, $125,808-154,073) for ambulatory MRM (all p < 0.01). This difference remained significant after adjustment for hospital length of stay. Adjusted logistic regression showed that the ambulatory setting was protective for readmission (odds ratio, 0.49; 95 % confidence interval, 0.35-0.70; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The analyses suggest that ambulatory MRM is both safe and less expensive. The findings advocate that MRM, a last holdout of inpatient care within breast surgical oncology, can be transitioned to the ambulatory setting for appropriate patients.

Patient Experience and Clinical Outcomes after Same-day Outpatient Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction Protocol during the Global Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provoked rapid changes in clinical practice to accommodate mandated restrictions within healthcare delivery. This study reviewed patient-reported experiences and clinical outcomes after implementation of a same-day discharge protocol after mastectomy with immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction compared with our historical overnight stay protocol.

Methods

This is a retrospective single-institution study of consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction between July 2019 and November 2020. A postoperative survey was completed by patients to evaluate satisfaction with perioperative communications, recovery, and their overall experience.

Results

A total of 302 patients (100% women) underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction (174 pre-COVID-19, 128 during COVID-19). During COVID-19, 71% of patients were scheduled for a same-day discharge, among which 89% were successfully discharged the same day. Compared with pre-COVID-19, there were no differences in type of surgery, operative times, pain scores, 30-day readmission, or unplanned visits (all P > 0.05) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with pre-COVID-19, patients during the pandemic reported comparable satisfaction with their care experience and postoperative recovery (56% survey response rate). Patient satisfaction was also similar between those discharged the same day (n = 81) versus the next day (n = 47) during COVID-19.

Conclusions

Same-day discharge is feasible, safe, and can provide similar patient-reported satisfaction and outcomes compared with traditional overnight stay. These data highlight the ability to deliver adaptable, high-quality breast cancer care, within the constraints of a global pandemic.

Same Day Discharge After Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

INTRODUCTION

Currently, overnight admission after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the standard of care. Our study aims to analyze the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of immediate IBR with same-day discharge as compared with the standard overnight stay.

METHODS

The 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate IBR for malignant breast disease. Patients were stratified into study (patients discharged day of surgery) and control (patients admitted after surgery) groups. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, implant type, wound complications, readmission, and reoperation rates were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of same-day discharge versus admission. In addition, Pearson χ2 test was used for comparison of proportions and t test was used for continuous variables unless distributions required subsequent nonparametric analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 21,923 cases were identified. The study group included 1361 patients discharged same day and the control group included 20,562 patient s admitted for average of 1.4 days (range, 1-86). Average age was 51 years for both groups. Average body mass index for the study group 27 and 28 kg/m2 for the control group, respectively. Total wound complication rates were similar (4.5% study, 4.3% control, P = 0.72). Reoperation rates were lower with same-day discharge (5.7% study, 6.8% control, P = 0.105), though not statistically significant. However, same-day discharge patients had a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the control (2.3% study, 4.2% control, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data analysis over a 6-year period reveals that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is associated with a significantly lower readmission rate when compared with the standard overnight stay. The comparable complication profiles show that immediate IBR with same-day discharge is safe, potentially benefiting both patients and hospitals.

Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting and Co-occurring Symptoms in Women Following Breast Cancer Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of potential co-occurring symptoms, including fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and pain, on the incidence of postdischarge nausea (PDN) measured two days following discharge to home after surgery for breast cancer.

DESIGN

This study used a prospective, cross-sectional, observational design.

METHODS

The sample was 334 women aged 27 to 88 years of age. Demographic data were collected from the patient and the medical record before surgery. Symptom data were collected 48 hours following surgery using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) and numerical nausea and pain scales.

FINDINGS

Eighty-five (25.4%) of study participants reported some nausea two days after discharge. Study participants who experienced PDN frequently described that it occurred after they left the hospital to drive home following their surgery. Unadjusted odds ratios showed the presence of co-occurring symptoms of anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain were all significantly associated with the presence of nausea 48 hours following surgery. Other significant factors associated with (PDN) were history of motion sickness, history of pregnancy-induced nausea, use of opioids, and type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Same-day surgery nurses providing postoperative education for women following surgery for breast cancer should explain to patients that nausea may occur after they are discharged, especially those with known motion sickness. In addition, patients should be informed that other symptoms, especially fatigue, sleep disturbance, and anxiety, may co-occur.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Patients Undergoing Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

- Mastectomy is still a common treatment for breast cancer. The introduction of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway (ERAS) having proven its benefits for major surgeries has not yet been validated for mastectomy without reconstruction. Our study was conducted to investigate the effects of implementing an ERAS pathway for mastectomies, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction.

METHOD

-The study population included all patients who underwent mastectomy without immediate breast reconstruction in the gynecological surgery department of the Tours University Hospital during the year 2020. We compared patients who underwent an ERAS protocol with those who were managed in a standard manner.

RESULTS

- Of the 92 patients managed for mastectomy, 32 were managed in the ERAS group. The two groups were comparable. We found fewer postoperative complications with this protocol in multivariate analysis. We also obtained a 37% response rate to the satisfaction questionnaires. We did not find any significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

- There is a trend towards a decrease in the length of hospitalization associated with a decrease in postoperative complications thanks to the implementation of a ERAS protocol for the management of mastectomies. Future studies should focus on both objective clinical outcomes and patient-reported experiences to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in mastectomy patients.

Outcomes of the same-day discharge following mastectomy before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The majority of patients undergoing mastectomy before the COVID-19 pandemic were admitted for 23-h observation to the hospital. Indications for observation included drain care education, pain control and observation for possible early surgical complications. This study compared the rates of outpatient mastectomy before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic and indirectly evaluated the safety of same-day discharge.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing mastectomy using Current Procedural Terminology code 19303.

RESULTS

A total of 357 patients were included: 113 were treated pre-COVID-19, 82 patients during COVID-19 and 162 post-COVID-19. The rate of outpatient mastectomies tripled during the pandemic from 17% to 51% (p < 0.001); after the pandemic remain high at 48%. The rate of bilateral mastectomies decreased during the pandemic to 30% from 48% prepandemic (p = 0.015). Pectoralis muscle block utilization increased during the COVID-19 period from 36% to 59% (p = 0.002). No difference in complication rates, including surgical site infections, hematomas, and readmissions, pre and during COVID.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of outpatient mastectomy increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. During this timeframe, perioperative complications did not increase, suggesting the safety of this practice. After the pandemic, the rate of outpatient mastectomy continued to be significantly higher than pre-COVID.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Allows Safe Same-Day Discharge in Expander Based and Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Data after enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with same-day discharge in breast reconstruction is limited. This study evaluates early postoperative outcomes after same-day discharge in tissue-expander immediate breast reconstruction (TE-IBR) and oncoplastic breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of TE-IBR patients from 2017 to 2022 and oncoplastic breast reconstruction patients from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Patients were divided by procedure and recovery pathway: group 1 (TE-IBR, overnight admission), group 2 (TE-IBR, ERAS), group 3 (oncoplastic, overnight admission), and group 4 (oncoplastic, ERAS). Groups 1 and 2 were subdivided by implant location: groups 1a (prepectoral) and 1b (subpectoral), and groups 2a (prepectoral) and 2b (subpectoral). Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and reoperations were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 160 TE-IBR patients (group 1, 91; group 2, 69) and 60 oncoplastic breast reconstruction patients (group 3, 8; group 4, 52) were included. Of the 160 TE-IBR patients, 73 underwent prepectoral reconstruction (group 1a, 25; group 2a, 48), and 87 underwent subpectoral reconstruction (group 1b, 66; group 2b, 21). There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities between groups 1 and 2. Group 3 had a higher average body mass index than group 4 (37.6 vs 32.2, P = 0.022). There was no significant difference between groups 1a and 2a or between groups 1b and 2b in rates of for rates of infection, hematoma, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, fat necrosis, implant loss, or reoperations. Group 3 and group 4 showed no significant difference in any complications or in reoperations. Notably, no patients in same-day discharge groups required unplanned hospital admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Many surgical subspecialities have successfully adopted ERAS protocols into their patient care and have shown both its safety and feasibility. Our research shows that same-day discharge in both TE-IBR and oncoplastic breast reconstruction does not increase risk for major complications or reoperations.

Performance of General Surgical Procedures in Outpatient Settings Before and After Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic

IMPORTANCE

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has advocated for the expansion of outpatient surgery to conserve limited hospital resources and bed capacity, while maintaining surgical throughput, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with outpatient scheduled general surgery procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from hospitals participating in the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019 (before COVID-19), and from January 1 to December 31, 2020 (during COVID-19). Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent any 1 of the 16 most frequently performed scheduled general surgery operations in the ACS-NSQIP database were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the percentage of outpatient cases (length of stay, 0 days) for each procedure. To determine the rate of change over time, multiple multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the independent association of year with the odds of outpatient surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 988 436 patients were identified (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [16.1] years; 574 683 women [58.1%]), of whom 823 746 underwent scheduled surgery before COVID-19 and 164 690 had surgery during COVID-19. On multivariable analysis, the odds of outpatient surgery during COVID-19 (vs 2019) were higher in patients who underwent mastectomy for cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.49 [95% CI, 2.33-2.67]), minimally invasive adrenalectomy (OR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.34-2.77]), thyroid lobectomy (OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.32-1.54]), breast lumpectomy (OR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.23-1.46]), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.27]), minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy (OR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.89-3.48]), parathyroidectomy (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.14-1.34]), and total thyroidectomy (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.42-1.65]). These odds were all greater than those observed for 2019 vs 2018, 2018 vs 2017, and 2017 vs 2016, suggesting that an accelerated increase in outpatient surgery rates in 2020 occurred as a consequence of COVID-19, rather than a continuation of secular trends. Despite these findings, only 4 procedures had a clinically meaningful (≥10%) overall increase in outpatient surgery rates during the study period: mastectomy for cancer (+19.4%), thyroid lobectomy (+14.7%), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (+10.6%), and parathyroidectomy (+10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an accelerated transition to outpatient surgery for many scheduled general surgical operations; however, the magnitude of percentage increase was small for all but 4 procedure types. Further studies should explore potential barriers to the uptake of this approach, particularly for procedures that have been shown to be safe when performed in an outpatient setting.

How to teach ERAS protocols: surgical residents' perspectives and perioperative practices for breast surgery patients

Purpose

Breast enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols emphasize multimodal analgesia to expedite home recovery, but variable implementation remains. This study examines how residents learn and use ERAS protocols, how they conceptualize pain management, and what influences breast surgery patients' same-day discharges.

Methods

Interviews were conducted with surgical residents following their breast surgery rotation using an interview guide adapted from existing pain management literature. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and independently inductively coded by two researchers. A codebook was developed and refined using the constant comparative method. Codes were grouped into categories and explored for thematic analysis.

Results

Twelve interviews were completed with plastic and general surgery residents. Ultimately, 365 primary codes were organized into 26 parent codes, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.93. A total of six themes were identified. Three themes described how participants learn through a mixture of templated care, formal education, and informal experiential learning. Two themes delineated how residents would teach breast surgery ERAS: by emphasizing buy-in and connecting the impetus behind ERAS with daily workflow implementation. One theme illustrated how a patient-centered culture impacts postoperative management and same-day discharges.

Conclusions

Residents describe learning breast surgery ERAS and postoperative pain management by imitating their seniors, observing patient encounters, completing templated orders, and translating concepts from other ERAS services more so than from formal lectures. When implementing breast ERAS protocols, it is important to consider how informal learning and local culture influence pain management and discharge practices. Ultimately, residents believe in ERAS and often request further educational tools to better connect the daily how-to of breast ERAS pathways with the why behind the enhanced recovery principles.

The Impact of Same-Day Discharge and Enhanced Recovery on Patient Quality of Life After Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate how enhanced recovery (ER) protocols and same-day discharge (SDD) influences patients' postoperative quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were identified in a prospective database. The study assessed QOL with BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. Responses were compared between the ER and pre-ER groups and between the SDD and hospital stay (HS) groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 568 patients, with a 43% response rate, and 217 patients were included for analysis. Chest physical well-being was lower for the ER cohort, but postoperative breast satisfaction was higher. Psychosocial status, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with information given did not differ significantly between the ER group and the pre-ER or SDD group. In the compared groups, QOL did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced recovery with SDD after mastectomy using implant-based reconstruction did not have an adverse impact on patient postoperative QOL.

Can an incomplete ERAS protocol reduce postoperative complications compared with conventional care in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer? A multicenter observational cohort and propensity score-matched analysis

Background

The patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectomy in many Chinese hospitals do not achieve high compliance with the ERAS (enhanced recovery programs after surgery) protocol.

Methods

The clinical data from 1,258 patients were collected and divided into the non-ERAS and incomplete ERAS groups.

Results

A total of 1,169 patients were screened for inclusion. After propensity score-matched analysis (PSM), 464 pairs of well-matched patients were generated for comparative study. Incomplete ERAS reduced the incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), both mild (6.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008) and severe (3.2% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.008). Statistically, incomplete ERAS reduced indirect surgical complications (27,5.8% vs. 59, 12.7) but not local complications (19,4.1% vs. 19, 4.1%). The subgroup analysis of postoperative complications revealed that all patients benefited from the incomplete ERAS protocol regardless of sex (male, p = 0.037, 11.9% vs. 17.9%; female, p = 0.010, 5.9% vs. 14.8%) or whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.015, 7.4% vs. 24.5%; no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.018, 10.2% vs. 15.8%). Younger patients (<60 year, p = 0.002, 7.6% vs. 17.5%) with a low BMI (<22.84, 9.4% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm, 8.1% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.004), no fundamental diseases (8.8% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.007), a low ASA score (1/2, 9.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.004), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon, 12.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.027), poor (6.1% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.012)/moderate (10.3% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.034) tumor differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (10.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.004) received more benefit from the incomplete ERAS protocol.

Conclusion

The incomplete ERAS protocol decreased the incidence of postoperative complications, especially among younger patients (<60 year) with a low BMI (<22.84), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm), no fundamental diseases, low ASA score (1/2), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon), poor/moderate differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy. ERAS should be recommended to as many patients as possible, although some will not exhibit high compliance. In the future, the core elements of ERAS need to be identified to improve the protocol.

Postoperative Hematomas in the Era of Outpatient Mastectomy: Is Ketorolac Really to Blame?

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols following mastectomy with or without implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) include ketorolac for multimodal perioperative analgesia. There are concerns that ketorolac could be associated with increased risk of postoperative hematoma formation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR between January 2013 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patients received 15 mg, 30 mg, or no ketorolac depending on ERAS protocol adherence, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference. Clinically significant hematoma was defined as requiring surgical intervention on day of surgery or postoperative day 1. Patients were compared by demographics, surgical characteristics, ketorolac dose, and hematoma prevalence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated hematoma formation odds.

RESULTS

Eight hundred patients met inclusion criteria: 477 received ketorolac. Those who received ketorolac were younger, had lower ASA scores, were more likely to have bilateral procedures and undergo concomitant IBBR, had longer operative times, were less likely to take antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications, had higher PACU pain scores, and had higher incidence of hematomas requiring surgical intervention. Of the cohort, 4.4% had clinically significant hematomas. The 15 mg and 30 mg ketorolac groups had similar prevalence (6.0% vs 5.8%, p = 0.95). On univariable regression, there were increased odds of hematoma formation in patients who were younger, had bilateral procedures, had longer OR times, and who received ketorolac. On multivariable regression, none of the prior variables remained significant.

CONCLUSION

After accounting for associations with longer operative times, concomitant IBBR, and bilateral procedures, ketorolac administration did not remain an independent risk factor for hematoma formation.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature

Objective

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient-centered, evidence-based pathways designed to reduce complications, promote recovery, and improve outcomes following surgery. These protocols have been successfully applied for the management of head and neck cancer, but relatively few studies have investigated the applicability of these pathways for other outpatient procedures in otolaryngology. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of available evidence reporting the utility of ERAS protocols for the management of patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngology operations.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and gray literature. We identified studies that evaluated ERAS protocols among patients undergoing otologic, laryngeal, nasal/sinus, pediatric, and general otolaryngology operations. We assessed the outcomes and ERAS components across protocols as well as the study design and limitations.

Results

A total of eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Types of procedures evaluated with ERAS protocols included tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and septoplasty. A reduction in postoperative length of stay and hospital costs was reported in two and three studies, respectively. Comparative studies between ERAS and control groups showed persistent improvement in pre- and postoperative anxiety and pain levels, without an increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates.

Conclusions

A limited number of studies discuss implementation of ERAS protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology. These clinical pathways appear promising for these procedures as they may reduce length of stay, decrease costs, and improve pain and anxiety postoperatively.

One-Year Experience of Same-Day Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Protocol

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of same-day mastectomy with reconstruction has continued to increase across the United States in recent years. Prior studies have shown that same-day mastectomy with reconstruction leads to increased patient satisfaction and allows hospitals to use resources better. This study sought to evaluate the implementation of same-day mastectomy with a reconstruction recovery protocol for patients undergoing mastectomy at our institution.

METHODS

Under an institutional review board-approved protocol, a retrospective cohort analysis compared patients who underwent mastectomy April 2016 through April 2017 with those who had mastectomy March 2020 through March 2021. Length of stay, postoperative intravenous (IV) opioid administration, safety end points, and cost were the main variables examined.

RESULTS

The study compared 457 patients in 2016-2017 with 428 patients in 2020-2021. The median hospital length of stay decreased from 24.6 h in 2016-2017 to 5.5 h in 2020-2021 (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients requiring postoperative IV opioids decreased from 69.1 % in 2016-2017 to 50 % in 2020-2021 (p < 0.001). The rates of unplanned readmissions within 30 days after mastectomy did not differ between the two groups, with a rate of 3.7 % in 2016-2017 and a rate of 5.1 % in 2020-2021 (p = 0.30). Reducing the rate of overnight admissions after mastectomy by 65.8 % resulted in a cost reduction of 65.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of same-day mastectomy with a reconstruction protocol across a large academic center and two satellite sites was a safe alternative to conventional mastectomy recovery plans.

Home Recovery After Mastectomy: Review of Literature and Strategies for Implementation American Society of Breast Surgeons Working Group

BACKGROUND

Practices regarding recovery after mastectomy vary significantly, including overnight stay versus discharge same day. Expanded use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) algorithms and the recent COVID pandemic have led to increased number of patients who undergo home recovery after mastectomy (HRAM).

METHODS

The Patient Safety Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons created a multispecialty working group to review the literature evaluating HRAM after mastectomy with and without implant-based reconstruction. A literature review was performed regarding this topic; the group then developed guidance for patient selection and tools for implementation.

RESULTS

Multiple, retrospective series have reported that patients discharged day of mastectomy have similar risk of complications compared with those kept overnight, including risk of hematoma (0-5.1%). Multimodal strategies that improve nausea and analgesia improve likelihood of HRAM. Patients who undergo surgery in ambulatory surgery centers and by high-volume breast surgeons are more likely to be discharged day of surgery. When evaluating unplanned return to care, the only significant factors are African American race and increased comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of current literature demonstrates that HRAM is a safe option in appropriate patients. Choice of method of recovery should consider patient factors, such as comorbidities and social situation, and requires input from the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative education regarding pain management, drain care, and after-hour access to medical care are crucial components to a successful program. Additional investigation is needed as these programs become more prevalent to assess quality measures such as unplanned return to care, complications, and patient satisfaction.

A national analysis of outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstruction trends from 2013 through 2019

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, patients with breast reconstruction (BR) were hospitalized at least one day postoperatively. However, new trends suggest that outpatient surgery is a viable and safe alternative. This study aims to assess trends among patients with breast cancer who underwent outpatient mastectomy alone, with immediate BR (IBR) or delayed BR (DBR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the 2013-2019 ACS NSQIP® database was conducted. All women who underwent outpatient mastectomy were included in this study. The cohort was divided as follows: (1) mastectomy without BR, (2) IBR, and (3) DBR. A Cochran-Armitage test and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate linear trends over time within groups, and overall and pairwise comparisons between groups across the years, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 84,954 women were included in this study. Overall, 54.9%, 16.2%, and 28.9% underwent mastectomy without BR, IBR, and DBR, respectively. From the BR groups, the majority had implant placement. A significant difference in incidence trends between the three groups was evidenced over time (p<0.001). The greatest increase was evidenced in the IBR group and the lowest in the mastectomy without BR group.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients, a significant difference in linear trends was evidenced over time within and between the three groups. Our results suggest that outpatient IBR procedures are increasing in a greater proportion compared to other surgical approaches. Further studies are required to better characterize this population and comprehend the decision-making process toward a surgical procedure within each of the three groups.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes

Background

Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted to the outpatient setting during the COVID‐19 pandemic to conserve inpatient hospital beds while providing timely oncologic care. We examine the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for trends in and safety of outpatient breast reconstruction during the pandemic.

Methods

NSQIP data were filtered for immediate alloplastic breast reconstructions between April and December of 2019 (before‐COVID) and 2020 (during‐COVID); the proportion of outpatient procedures was compared. Thirty‐day complications were compared for noninferiority between propensity‐matched outpatients and inpatients utilizing a 1% risk difference margin.

Results

During COVID, immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction cases decreased (4083 vs. 4677) and were more frequently outpatient (31% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Outpatients had lower rates of smoking (6.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.03) and obesity (26% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Surgical complication rates of outpatient procedures were noninferior to propensity‐matched inpatients (5.0% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.03 noninferiority). Reoperation rates were lower in propensity‐matched outpatients (5.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction shifted towards outpatient procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic with noninferior complication rates. Therefore, a paradigm shift towards outpatient reconstruction for certain patients may be safe. However, decreased reoperations in outpatients may represent undiagnosed complications and warrant further investigation.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in DIEP-Flap Breast Reconstructions-A Comparison of Two Reconstructive Centers with and without ERAS-Protocol

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is established for autologous breast reconstruction. ERAS leads to a shortened hospital stay and improved outcome after elective surgery. In this retrospective, two-center case−control study, we compared two different treatment regimens for patients undergoing a DIEP-flap breast reconstruction from two centers, one with an established ERAS protocol and one without. All patients with DIEP breast reconstructions over the period of 12 months were included. The primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS) in days. A total of 79 patients with 95 DIEP-flaps were analyzed. In group A (ERAS) 42 patients were operated with DIEP flaps, in group B (non-ERAS) 37 patients. LOS was significantly reduced in the ERAS group (4.51 days) compared to the non-ERAS group (6.32; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that, in group A, LOS is significantly affected by surgery duration. BMI in the ERAS group had no effect on LOS. In group B a higher BMI resulted in a significantly higher LOS. In multivariate analysis, neither age nor type for surgery (primary/secondary/after neoadjuvant therapy, etc.) affected LOS. In both groups, no systemic or flap-related complications were observed. Comparing two reconstructive centers with and without implemented ERAS, ERAS led to a significantly decreased LOS for all patients. ERAS implementation does not result in an increased complication rate or flap loss. Postoperative pain can be well managed with basic analgesia using NSAID when intraoperative blocks are applied. The reduced use of opioids was well tolerated. With implementation of ERAS the recovery experience can be enhanced making autologous breast reconstructions more available and attractive for various patients.

Statewide Episode Spending Variation of Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Centralizing complex cancer operations, such as pancreatectomy and esophagectomy, has been shown to increase value, largely due to reduction in complications. For high-volume operations with low complication rates, it is unknown to what degree value varies between facilities, or by what mechanism value may be improved. To identify possible opportunities for value enhancement for such operations, we sought to describe variations in episode spending for mastectomy with a secondary aim of identifying patient- and facility-level determinants of variation.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the Michigan Value Collaborative risk-adjusted, price-standardized claims data, we evaluated mean spending for patients undergoing mastectomy at 74 facilities (n = 7,342 patients) across the state of Michigan. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day episode spending. Using linear mixed models, facility- and patient-level factors were explored for association with spending variability.

RESULTS

Among 7,342 women treated across 74 facilities, mean 30-day spending by facility ranged from $11,129 to $20,830 (median $14,935). Ninety-day spending ranged from $17,303 to $31,060 (median $23,744). Patient-level factors associated with greater spending included simultaneous breast reconstruction, bilateral surgery, length of stay, and readmission. Among women not undergoing reconstruction, variation persisted, and length of stay, bilateral surgery, and readmission were all associated with increased spending.

CONCLUSION

Michigan hospitals have significant variation in spending for mastectomy. Reducing length of stay through wider adoption of same-day discharge for mastectomy and reducing the frequency of bilateral surgery may represent opportunities to increase value, without compromising patient safety or oncologic outcomes.