Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Survival Analysis Supporting Use in Patients with High-Risk Disease

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: treatment outcomes after curative-intent resection in an Australian tertiary referral hospital

BACKGROUND

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and liver resection offers the best chance of possible cure. This study aimed to assess treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for long-term survival in patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from patients with MF-ICC managed at the Royal North Shore/North Shore Private Hospital from January 1998 to October 2023. Baseline, peri-operative and long-term outcomes have been analysed, including an overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

RESULTS

During the 25-year study period, 47 patients underwent curative-intent liver resection for primary MF-ICC at a median age of 70 years. The median OS was 36 months, with a 5-year OS of 33%. Multiple liver tumours (HR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.24-6.48; P = 0.013) and a positive resection margin (HR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.10-5.52; P = 0.029) were identified as independent predictors of poor long-term OS. Recurrence occurred in 62% of patients after a median DFS of 16 months, with poor tumour differentiation (HR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.62-9.54; P = 0.002) and elevated tumour markers (HR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.53-7.87; P = 0.003) as independent predictors of poor DFS.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection can offer a significant chance for prolonged survival in a highly selected population of patients with MF-ICC. However, the surgical challenges inherent in treating this rare disease are evident, emphasizing the need for a multimodal approach and continued exploration of additional therapies to enhance personalized treatment strategies.

"Biological R2" resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: identification of patients at risk for poor oncologic outcomes after curative-intent resection

INTRODUCTION

We sought to define a cohort of patients with "biological R2" (bR2) resection, defined as recurrence within 12 weeks, following curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In addition, we sought to identify factors associated with bR2 risk.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent surgery for ICC were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The weighted beta-coefficients of preoperative risk factors were used to construct an online tool to predict bR2.

RESULTS

Among 1138 patients, 106 (9.3 %) patients had a bR2 resection. Patients with bR2 were more likely to be younger (OR 0.97) and non-White (OR 2.19), as well as more often had cirrhosis (OR 2.11), a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.07), a higher tumor burden score (OR 1.16), and metastatic nodal disease on preoperative imaging (OR 1.92). Patients categorized as low-risk had a 3.2 % risk of bR2, intermediate-risk patients had an 11.1 % risk of bR2, whereas patients in the high-risk category had a 27.6 % risk of bR2 (p < 0.001). An online tool was made available at https://junkawashima.shinyapps.io/bR2_ICC/, https://junkawashima.shinyapps.io/CRLMfollwingchemotherapy/.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in ten patients with resectable ICC had a bR2 resection. An online calculator can may help clinicians identify patients with ICC at highest risk of a bR2 resection.

Recurrence-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Upfront Surgery: An International Multi-institutional Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a validated surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) among patients undergoing upfront surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been defined. We sought to evaluate the correlation between RFS and OS after surgical resection for ICC. We hypothesized that RFS was a reliable surrogate endpoint for OS among patients with ICC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent surgery for ICC between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The correlation between RFS and OS was assessed using rank correlation. Landmark analysis evaluated concordance between survival at 5 years and recurrence status at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 54 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Among 1541 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection, the median RFS and OS were 22.6 months and 41.5 months, respectively. A moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS was identified (ρ = 0.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.82). In the landmark analysis, the concordance between 5-year OS after surgery and recurrence status at different time points (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 54 months) was 60.7%, 72.0%, 81.4%, 83.1%, 83.0%, and 82.5%, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated that the prediction of OS based on RFS increased with time and plateaued 3 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ICC, there was a moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS. Three-year RFS may be a reliable surrogate endpoint to predict 5-year OS and should be considered in future trial design.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: role of imaging as a critical component for multi-disciplinary treatment approach

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a unifying title granted to epithelial adenocarcinomas specific to the bile ducts making up 10-25% of all hepatobiliary malignancies. CCA is more appropriately classified based on anatomic site of origin within the biliary tract into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), peri-hilar (pCCA) cholangiocarcinoma, and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma makes up 10-20% of CCA and originates within and/or proximal to the second order bile ducts. The incidence of iCCA has been rising overtime with up to 1.26 per 100,000 persons, per year in the United States and up to 3.3 per 100, 000 persons, per year affected globally. Risk factors include chronic hepatic inflammation secondary to viral hepatitis, alcohol/NASH cirrhosis, biliary cystic lesions, and endemic causes, among other less common genetic drivers. Given its rarity, the recognition and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, iCCA specifically, remains challenging resulting in delays in treatment initiation or any treatment at all. Median overall survival (mOS) for iCCA remains low. Early diagnosis, and stage-based treatment approaches have evolved and are associated with improved survival. To this goal, a multi-disciplinary treatment approach has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes by providing expert evaluation as it pertains to an accurate imaging and histologic diagnosis, staging, radiologic and surgical review for resectability, operative expertise, post operative care, as well as comprehensive knowledge and implementation of systemic/targeted or liver directed therapies. Here, we discuss the central role of imaging in the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to implement a comprehensive treatment plan that frequently involves multiple disciplines to achieve the best outcome for each patient.

Design of studies on neoadjuvant therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The high recurrence rate and dismal prognosis of localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) indicate the unmet need for effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. In recent years, progress has been made in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), leading to clinical exploration of the provision of these therapies in the perioperative period. Based on years of experience in clinical research on hepatobiliary cancers, the authors discuss the design of studies on neoadjuvant therapy for ICC, aiming to provide references for future neoadjuvant studies.

MRI-based microvascular invasion prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: survival and therapeutic benefit

OBJECTIVES

To establish an MRI-based model for microvascular invasion (MVI) prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-iCCA) and further evaluate its potential survival and therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six pathologically confirmed MF-iCCAs with traditional surgery (121 in training and 35 in validation cohorts), 33 with neoadjuvant treatment and 57 with first-line systemic therapy were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors for MVI in the traditional surgery group, and an MVI-predictive model was constructed. Survival analyses were conducted and compared between MRI-predicted MVI-positive and MVI-negative MF-iCCAs in different treatment groups.

RESULTS

Tumor multinodularity (odds ratio = 4.498, p < 0.001) and peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity (odds ratio = 4.163, p < 0.001) were independently significant variables associated with MVI. AUC values for the predictive model were 0.760 [95% CI 0.674, 0.833] in the training cohort and 0.757 [95% CI 0.583, 0.885] in the validation cohort. Recurrence-free survival or progression-free survival of the MRI-predicted MVI-positive patients was significantly shorter than the MVI-negative patients in all three treatment groups (log-rank p < 0.001 to 0.046). The use of neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with improved postoperative recurrence-free survival for high-risk MF-iCCA patients in both MRI-predicted MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups (log-rank p = 0.79 and 0.27). Advanced MF-iCCA patients of the MRI-predicted MVI-positive group had significantly worse objective response rate than the MVI-negative group with systemic therapy (40.91% vs 76.92%, χ2 = 5.208, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based MVI-predictive model could be a potential biomarker for personalized risk stratification and survival prediction in MF-iCCA patients with varied therapies and may aid in candidate selection for systemic therapy.

KEY POINTS

Question Identifying intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients at high risk for microvascular invasion (MVI) may inform prognostic risk stratification and guide clinical treatment decision. Findings We established an MRI-based predictive model for MVI in mass-forming-iCCA, integrating imaging features of tumor multinodularity and peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity. Clinical relevance The MRI-based MVI-predictive model could be a potential biomarker for personalized risk stratification and survival prediction across varied therapies and may aid in therapeutic candidate selection for systemic therapy.

Preoperative prognostic stratification and prediction of long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) frequently receive adjuvant chemotherapy in preoperative and postoperative settings, but prediction of prognostic risk at the time of treatment selection remains challenging.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled DCC patients who underwent initial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative clinical parameters were collected, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 170 patients examined, the median tumor depth was 10 mm, and 37 % of the patients were diagnosed with pT3. Overall, 46 % of patients had lymph node metastasis. The median and 5-year OS was 58.2 months and 50 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size on computed tomography (CT) ≥15 mm and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (≥3 mm) as independent risk factors for OS among various preoperative parameters; the prognosis was stratified based on these two parameters. Patients with one risk factor had similar outcomes (5-year OS: 39 %) to pStage IIB DCC (pT2N1 or pT3), while those with two risk factors had a prognosis akin to pStage IIIA (pN2), with a high early recurrence rate of 64 % (5-year OS: 8 %). Among non-risk group patients with low carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 levels (<37 U/mL), the prognosis was comparable (5-year OS: 72 %) to those with pStage I DCC.

CONCLUSION

A simple stratification approach was developed to predict long-term postoperative outcomes. To improve poor prognosis, intensive therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for patients with two risk factors.

A preliminary study of developing an MRI-based model for postoperative recurrence prediction and treatment direction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To establish an MRI-based predictive model for postoperative recurrence in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and further to evaluate the model utility in treatment direction for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally 114 iCCA patients with curative surgery were retrospectively included, including 38 patients in the neoadjuvant treatment, traditional surgery, and adjuvant treatment groups for each. Predictive variables associated with postoperative recurrence were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a prognostic model was formulated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) curves were compared using log-rank test between MRI-predicted high-risk and low-risk iCCAs stratified by the optimal threshold.

RESULTS

Tumor multiplicity (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.671 [95%CI 1.036, 2.695], P = 0.035), hemorrhage (HR = 2.391 [95%CI 1.189, 4.810], P = 0.015), peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity (HR = 1.723 [95%CI 1.085, 2.734], P = 0.021), and positive regional lymph node (HR = 2.175 [95%CI 1.295, 3.653], P = 0.003) were independently associated with postoperative recurrence; treatment group was not significantly related to recurrence (P > 0.05). Independent variables above were incorporated for the recurrence prediction model, the 1-year and 2-year time-dependent area under the curve values were 0.723 (95%CI 0.631, 0.815) and 0.725 (95%CI 0.634, 0.816), respectively. After risk stratification, the MRI-predicted high-risk iCCA patients had higher cumulative incidences of recurrence and worse RFS than the low-risk patients (P < 0.001 for both). In the MRI-predicted high-risk patients, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved all-stage RFS (P = 0.034), and adjuvant therapy was associated with improved RFS after 4 months (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI-based iCCA recurrence predictive model may serve as a decision-making tool for both personalized prognostication and therapy selection.

The Current Role of Radiation in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma-A Narrative Review

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of bile ducts. It is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of CCA is rising worldwide. Anatomical subgroups have been used to classify patients for treatment and prognosis. There is a growing understanding of clinically important distinctions based on underlying genetic differences that lead to different treatment options and outcomes. Its management is further complicated by a heterogeneous population and relative rarity, which limits the conduct of large trials to guide management. Surgery has been the primary method of therapy for localized disease; however, recurrence and death remain high with or without surgery. Therefore, there have been concerted efforts to investigate new treatment options, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments to optimize surgical outcomes, targeted therapy, leveraging a new understanding of immunobiology and stereotactic radiation. In this narrative review, we address the evidence to improve suboptimal outcomes in unresectable CCA with radiation, as well as the role of radiation in neoadjuvant and postoperative treatment. We also briefly discuss the recent developments in systemic treatment with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

A phase II/III randomized clinical trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative chemotherapy versus immediate resection in patIents with resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at high risk for recurrence: PURITY study

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival inferior to 20%(1-3). The only potential curative treatment is surgical resection. However, despite complex surgical procedures that have a remarkable risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, the 5-year survival rate after radical surgery (R0) is 20-40% and recurrence rates are up to ~ 75%(4-6). Up to ~ 40% of patients relapse within 12 months after resection, and half of these patient will recur systemically(4-6). There is no standard of care for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable BTC, but retrospective reports suggest its potential benefit (7, 8).

METHODS

PURITY is a no-profit, multicentre, randomized phase II/III trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence. Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant GAP followed by surgery as compared to upfront surgery, in terms of 12-month progression-free survival for the phase II part and of progression free survival (PFS) for the phase III study. Key Secondary objectives are event free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, (RFS), overall survival (OS), R0/R1/R2 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), overall response rate (ORR), resectability. Safety analyses will include toxicity rate and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate. Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues and longitudinal ctDNA analysis are planned to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis.

DISCUSSION

Considering the poor prognosis of resected BTC experiencing early tumor recurrence and the negative prognostic impact of R1/R2 resections, PURITY study is based on the rationale that NAC may improve R0 resection rates and ultimately patients' outcomes. Furthermore, NAC should allow early eradication of microscopic distant metastases, undetectable by imaging but already present at the time of diagnosis and avoid mortality and morbidity associated with resection for patients with rapid progression or worsening general condition during neoadjuvant therapy. The randomized PURITY study will evaluate whether patients affected by BTC at high risk from recurrence benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy with GAP regimen as compared to immediate surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PURITY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037980) and EuCT(2023-503295-25-00).

The State of Systematic Therapies in Clinic for Hepatobiliary Cancers

Hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) includes hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract carcinoma (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma), and its morbidity and mortality are significantly correlated with disease stage. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for early stage of HBC. However, a large proportion of patients with HBC are diagnosed with advanced stage and can only receive systemic treatment. According to the results of clinical trials, the first-line and second-line treatment programs are constantly updated with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. In order to improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, and reduce the adverse reactions of patients, the treatment of HBC has gradually developed from single-agent therapy to combination. The traditional therapeutic philosophy proposed that patients with advanced HBC are only amenable to systematic therapies. With some encouraging clinical trial results, the treatment concept has been revolutionized, and patients with advanced HBC who receive novel systemic combination therapies with multi-modality treatment (including surgery, transplant, TACE, HAIC, RT) have significantly improved survival time. This review summarizes the treatment options and the latest clinical advances of HBC in each stage and discusses future direction, in order to inform the development of more effective treatments for HBC.

Nomogram based on preoperative clinical and MRI features to estimate the microvascular invasion status and the prognosis of solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a nomogram based on preoperative clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for the microvascular invasion (MVI) status in solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (sIMCC) and to evaluate whether it could predict recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

We included 115 cases who experienced MRI examinations for sIMCC with R0 resection. The preoperative clinical and MRI features were extracted. Independent predictors related to MVI+ were evaluated by stepwise multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the predictive ability. All patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups of MVI. Then, the correlations of the nomogram with RFS in patents with sIMCC were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The occurrence rate of MVI+ was 38.3% (44/115). The preoperative independent predictors of MVI+ were carbohydrate antigen 19-9 > 37 U/ml, tumor size > 5 cm, and an ill-defined tumor boundary. Integrating these predictors, the nomogram exerted a favorable diagnostic performance with areas under the ROC curve of 0.767 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.654-0.881) in the development cohort, and 0.760 (95% CI 0.591-0.929) in the validation cohort. In the RFS analysis, significant differences were observed between the high- and low-risk MVI groups (6-month RFS rates: 64.5% vs. 78.8% and 46.7% vs. 82.4% in the development and validation cohorts, respectively) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram based on clinical and MRI features is a potential biomarker of MVI and may be a potent method to classify the risk of recurrence in patients with sIMCC.

Predicting risk of recurrence after resection of stage I intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often an indication of curative-intent resection. Although patients with early-stage ICC generally have a better prognosis than individuals with advanced ICC, the incidence and risk factors of recurrence after early-stage ICC remain unclear.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2018 for ICC with pathologically confirmed stage I disease. Cox regression analysis was used to identify clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence, and an online prediction model was developed and validated.

RESULTS

Of 430 patients diagnosed with stage I ICC, approximately one-half of patients (n = 221, 51.4%) experienced recurrence after curative-intent resection. Among patients with a recurrence, most (n = 188, 85.1%) experienced it within 12 months. On multivariable analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (hazard ratio [HR], 1.011; 95% CI, 1.004-1.018), systemic immune-inflammation index (HR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.019-1.056), no lymph nodes evaluated (HR, 1.851; 95% CI, 1.276-2.683), and tumor size (HR, 1.101; 95% CI, 1.053-1.151) were associated with greater hazards of recurrence. A predictive model that included these weighted risk factors demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination in the test (12-month recurrence-free survival [RFS]: low risk, 80.1%; intermediate risk, 60.3%; high risk, 37.7%; P = .001) and validation (12-month RFS: low risk, 84.5%; intermediate risk, 63.5%; high risk, 47.1%; P = .036) datasets. The online predictive model was made available at https://ktsahara.shinyapps.io/stageI_icc/.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I ICC without vascular invasion or lymph node metastasis had a relatively high incidence of recurrence. An online tool can risk stratify patients relative to recurrence risk to identify individuals best suited for alternative treatment approaches.

Preoperative MRI features predicting very early recurrence of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma after R0 resection: a comparison with the AJCC 8th edition staging system

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish a nomogram based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict the very early recurrence (VER, less than 6 months) of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) after R0 resection.

METHODS

This study enrolled a group of 193 IMCC patients from our institution between March 2010 and January 2022. Patients were allocated into the development cohort (n = 137) and the validation cohort (n = 56), randomly, and the preoperative clinical and MRI features were collected. Univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression assessments were adopted to assess predictors of VER. Nomogram was constructed and certificated in the validation cohort. The performance of the prediction nomogram was evaluated by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. The performance of the nomogram was compared with the T stage of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (27.5%) experienced VER of the tumor and 140 patients (72.5%) with non-VER, during the follow-up period. After multivariate stepwise logistic regression, number of lesions, diffuse hypoenhancement on arterial phase, necorsis and suspicious lymph nodes were independently associated with VER. The nomogram demonstrated significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 than T stage (AUC = 0.666, P = 0.006) in the development cohort, whereas in the validation cohort, the nomogram showed better discrimination performance, with an AUC of 0.808 than T stage (0.705) with no significantly difference (P = 0.230). Decision curve analysis reflected the clinical net benefit of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on preoperative MRI features is a reliable tool to predict VER for patients with IMCC after R0 resection. This nomogram will be helpful to improve survival prediction and individualized treatment.

Molecular targeted and systemic therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-disciplinary approach

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed with advanced disease. For individuals with resectable tumors, R0 resection with lymphadenectomy is the best potentially curative-intent treatment. After resection, adjuvant therapy with capecitabine is the current standard of care. For patients with unresectable or distant metastatic disease, doublet chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the most utilized first-line regimen, but recent studies using triplet regimens and even the addition of immunotherapy have begun to shift the paradigm of systemic therapy. Molecular therapies have recently received US FDA approval for second-line treatment for patients harboring actionable genomic alterations. This review focuses on the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of ICC with an emphasis on molecular targeted and systemic therapy.

Risk stratification for overall survival and recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI and clinical features

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish two nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 120 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with solitary IMCC. Preoperative MRI and clinical features were collected. Based on the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, two nomograms were constructed to predict OS and RFS, respectively. The effective performance of the nomograms was evaluated using concordance index (C-index). The prognostic stratification systems for OS and RFS were developed and used to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups.

RESULTS

Suspicious lymph nodes, arterial phase (AP) enhancement patterns, and bile duct dilatation were independent predictors of OS, while suspicious lymph nodes, AP enhancement patterns, and necrosis were independent predictors of RFS. The nomograms achieved the C-index values of 0.705/0.710 for OS and 0.721/0.759 for RFS in the development/validation cohorts, which were significantly higher than those of the T and TNM stages (P < 0.05). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups, the 1-year OS and RFS rates of high-risk patients were poorer than those of patients with low-risk in the development cohort (OS: 93.5% vs 76.3%, P < 0.001; RFS: 74.5% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Two nomograms were constructed based on preoperative MRI features in patients with solitary IMCC for predicting the OS and RFS and facilitate further prognostic stratification.

Identification and validation of a plasma metabolomics-based model for risk stratification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the mainstay of curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) while the postoperative prognosis varies greatly, with no recognized biomarker. We aimed to identify the plasma metabolomic biomarkers that could be used for preoperative risk stratification of ICC patients.

METHODS

108 eligible ICC patients who underwent radical surgical resection between August 2012 and October 2020 were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into a discovery cohort (n = 76) and a validation cohort (n = 32) by 7:3. Metabolomics profiling of preoperative plasma was performed and clinical data were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to screen and validate the survival-related metabolic biomarker panel and construct a LASSO-Cox prediction model.

RESULTS

10 survival-related metabolic biomarkers were used for construction of a LASSO-Cox prediction model. In the discovery and validation cohorts, the LASSO-Cox prediction model achieved an AUC of 0.876 (95%CI: 0.777-0.974) and 0.860 (95%CI: 0.711-1.000) in evaluating 1-year OS of ICC patients, respectively. The OS of ICC patients in the high-risk group was significantly worse than that in the low-risk group (discovery cohort, p < 0.0001; validation cohort: p = 0.041). Also, the LASSO-Cox risk score (HR 2.43, 95%CI: 1.81-3.26, p < 0.0001) was a significant independent risk factor associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The LASSO-Cox prediction model has potential as an important tool in evaluating the OS of ICC patients after surgical resection and can be used as prediction tools to implement the best treatment options that could result in better outcomes.

Benchmarks and Geographic Differences in Gallbladder Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

High-quality surgery plays a central role in the delivery of excellent oncologic care. Benchmark values indicate the best achievable results. We aimed to define benchmark values for gallbladder cancer (GBC) surgery across an international population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included consecutive patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery during 2000-2021 at 13 centers, across seven countries and four continents. Patients operated on at high-volume centers without the need for vascular and/or bile duct reconstruction and without significant comorbidities were chosen as the benchmark group.

RESULTS

Of 906 patients who underwent curative-intent GBC surgery during the study period, 245 (27%) were included in the benchmark group. These were predominantly women (n = 174, 71%) and had a median age of 64 years (interquartile range 57-70 years). In the benchmark group, 50 patients (20%) experienced complications within 90 days after surgery, with 20 patients (8%) developing major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa). Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 4-8 days). Benchmark values included ≥ 4 lymph nodes retrieved, estimated intraoperative blood loss ≤ 350 mL, perioperative blood transfusion rate ≤ 13%, operative time ≤ 332 min, length of hospital stay ≤ 8 days, R1 margin rate ≤ 7%, complication rate ≤ 22%, and rate of grade ≥ IIIa complications ≤ 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for GBC remains associated with significant morbidity. The availability of benchmark values may facilitate comparisons in future analyses among GBC patients, GBC surgical approaches, and centers performing GBC surgery.

Impact of Staging Concordance and Downstaging After Neoadjuvant Therapy on Survival Following Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Bayesian Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Concordance between clinical and pathological staging, as well as the overall survival (OS) benefit associated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remain ill-defined. We sought to determine the impact of staging accuracy and NAT downstaging on OS among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Patients treated for ICC between 2010 and 2018 were identified using the National Cancer Database. A Bayesian approach was applied to estimate NAT downstaging. OS was assessed relative to staging concordant/overstaged disease treated with upfront surgery, understaged disease treated with upfront surgery, no downstaging, and downstaging after NAT.

RESULTS

Among 3384 patients, 2904 (85.8%) underwent upfront surgery, whereas 480 (14.2%) received NAT and 85/480 (18.4%) were downstaged. Patients with cT3 (odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-3.34), cN1 (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.71-3.58) disease, and patients treated at high-volume facilities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.13-2.36) were more likely to receive NAT (all p < 0.05). Median OS was 40.1 months (95% CI 38.6-43.4). Patients with cT1-2N1 (NAT: 31.5 months vs. upfront surgery: 22.4 months; p = 0.04) and cT3-4N1 (NAT: 27.8 months vs. upfront surgery: 14.4 months; p = 0.01) disease benefited most from NAT. NAT downstaging decreased the risk of death among patients with cT3-4N1 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.82). In contrast, understaged patients with cT1-2N0/X (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.83-2.53) and cT3-4N0/X (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.74) disease treated with upfront surgery had increased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with N1 ICC treated with NAT demonstrated improved OS compared with upfront surgery. Downstaging secondary to NAT conferred survival benefits among patients with cT3-4N1 versus upfront surgery. NAT should be considered in ICC patients with advanced T disease and/or nodal metastases.

EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) develops inside the liver, between bile ductules and the second-order bile ducts. It is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, and its global incidence is increasing. It is associated with an alarming mortality rate owing to its silent presentation (often leading to late diagnosis), highly aggressive nature and resistance to treatment. Early diagnosis, molecular characterisation, accurate staging and personalised multidisciplinary treatments represent current challenges for researchers and physicians. Unfortunately, these challenges are beset by the high heterogeneity of iCCA at the clinical, genomic, epigenetic and molecular levels, very often precluding successful management. Nonetheless, in the last few years, progress has been made in molecular characterisation, surgical management, and targeted therapy. Recent advances together with the awareness that iCCA represents a distinct entity amongst the CCA family, led the ILCA and EASL governing boards to commission international experts to draft dedicated evidence-based guidelines for physicians involved in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of iCCA.

Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Currently, surgical resection is the most commonly performed and effective treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) worldwide. However, the prognosis of ICC is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The study also intends to explore whether chemotherapy should be introduced before surgery and which populations should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHOD

Four databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception dates to January 2022 for relevant articles. The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager Software (version5.3). The non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies and the overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Moreover, the primary outcomes included 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were R0 resection, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 2412 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year RFS, postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality between the two groups. However, the meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a better 5-year OS benefit in ICC patients than the upfront surgery group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.58), while the R0 resection rate was lower in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group than that in the upfront surgery group (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.91).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery could prolong the 5-year OS without increasing the risk of postoperative complications in ICC patients. Considering that the patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery group had more advanced ICC cases, the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be more significant in patients with more advanced ICC.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Extrahepatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Survival Analysis

Background: Although surgery is the mainstay of curative-intent treatment for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBTC), recurrence following surgery can be high and prognosis poor. The impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) relative to upfront surgery (US) among patients with EBTC remains unclear. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2017 for EBTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). Trends in NAT utilization were investigated, and the impact of NAT on prognosis was compared with US using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Results: Among 6582 EBTC patients (GBC, n = 4467, ECC, n = 2215), 1.6% received NAT; the utilization of NAT for EBTC increased over time (Ptrend = 0.03). Among patients with lymph node metastasis, the lymph node ratio was lower among patients with NAT (0.18 vs. 0.40, p < 0.01). After PSM, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients treated with NAT versus US (5-year OS: 24.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.14, 5-year CSS: 38.0% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.21). A subgroup analysis revealed that NAT was associated with improved OS and CSS among patients with stages III-IVA of the disease (OS: HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.46-0.92, p = 0.02, CSS: HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41-0.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions: While NAT did not provide an overall benefit to patients undergoing surgery for EBTC, individuals with advanced-stage disease had improved OS and CSS with NAT. An individualized approach to NAT use among patients with EBTC may provide a survival benefit.

Optimizing Circulating Tumour DNA Use in the Perioperative Setting for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnosis, Screening, Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Treatment Response Monitoring

In this review, we present the current evidence and future perspectives on the use of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the diagnosis, management and understanding the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) undergoing surgery. Liquid biopsies or ctDNA maybe utilized to: (1) determine the molecular profile of the tumour and therefore guide the selection of molecular targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant setting, (2) form a surveillance tool for the detection of minimal residual disease or cancer recurrence after surgery, and (3) diagnose and screen for early iCCA detection in high-risk populations. The potential for ctDNA can be tumour-informed or -uninformed depending on the goals of its use. Future studies will require ctDNA extraction technique validations, with standardizations of both the platforms and the timing of ctDNA collections.

Editorial: Surgical Advances in Pancreaticobiliary Diseases

Pancreaticobiliary diseases include malignant tumors arising in organs with a complex anatomy, such as the pancreas and bile ducts, often presenting as locally advanced or metastatic lesions, and they frequently have a poor prognosis [...].

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma - does pathologic response mean better outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unknown. We sought to evaluate our experience treating high-risk ICC with NAC and to determine the prognostic significance of pathologic response.

METHODS

Patients with ICC treated with NAC and surgery were analyzed using a prospectively maintained database. Pathologic response was graded by a blinded pathologist. Clinicopathologic/treatment variables were evaluated for associations with survival.

RESULTS

Among 45 patients who received NAC followed by hepatectomy for high-risk ICC, 32(71%) were considered stage III, and 6(13%) were considered stage IV at time of diagnosis. Major response was identified in 39% of cases, including 2 with pathologic complete response. Patients with major response had a longer median NAC duration than patients with minor response (6 vs 4cycles, P=0.02). Regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin vs gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel) was not associated with response rate. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11 and 45 months. Pathologic response was not associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Pathologic response to NAC was not associated with survival in this highly selected cohort. Nonetheless, the extended OS experienced by these high-risk patients is encouraging and suggests that NAC may help select patients who stand to benefit from aggressive resection.

Neoadjuvant therapy use and association with postoperative outcomes and overall survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is limited. Our objectives were to: (1) characterize treatment trends, (2) identify factors associated with receipt of NAT, and (3) evaluate associations between NAT and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between NAT and postoperative outcomes. Stratified analysis evaluated differences between surgery first, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT).

RESULTS

Among 8040 patients, 417 (5.2%) received NAT. NAT increased during the study period 2.9%-8.4% (p < 0.001). Factors associated with receipt of NAT included age <50 (vs. >75, odds ratio [OR] 4.32, p < 0.001) and stage 3 disease (vs. 1, OR 1.68, p = 0.01). Compared with surgery first, patients who received NAT had higher odds of R0 resection (OR 1.49, p = 0.01) and lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.51, p = 0.04). On stratified analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with differences in any outcomes. However, neoadjuvant CRT was associated with improvement in R0 resection (OR 3.52, <0.001) and median survival (47.8 vs. 25.3 months, log-rank < 0.001) compared to surgery first.

CONCLUSIONS

NAT, particularly neoadjuvant CRT, was associated with improved postoperative outcomes. These data suggest expanding the use of neoadjuvant CRT for eCCA.

The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review

Introduction

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival.

Methods

Search terms such as 'neoadjuvant therapy' and 'cholangiocarcinoma' were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review.

Results

5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781.

Systemic Therapy Is Associated with Improved Oncologic Outcomes in Resectable Stage II/III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An Examination of the National Cancer Database over the Past Decade

Limited evidence-based management guidelines for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) currently exist. Using a large population-based cancer registry; the utilization rates and outcomes for patients with clinical stages I-III ICC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in relation to other treatment strategies were investigated, as were the predictors of treatment regimen utilization. Oncologic outcomes were compared between treatment strategies. Amongst 2736 patients, chemotherapy utilization was low; however, NAT use increased from 4.3% to 7.2% (p = 0.011) over the study period. A higher clinical stage was predictive of the use of NAT, while higher pathologic stage and margin-positive resections were predictive of the use of adjuvant therapy (AT). For patients with more advanced disease, the receipt of NAT or AT was associated with significantly improved survival compared to surgery alone (cStage II, p = 0.040; cStage III, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients receiving NAT were more likely to undergo margin-negative resections compared to those treated with AT (72.5% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.027), despite having higher-risk tumors. This analysis of treatment strategies for resectable ICC suggests a benefit for systemic therapy. Prospective and randomized studies evaluating the sequencing of treatments for patients with high-risk resectable ICC are needed.

Is it safe to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients undergoing hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? ACS-NSQIP propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing. The objective of this study was to compare the 30-day post-operative complications and length-of-stay (LOS) between patients undergoing hepatectomy for iCCA with and without NAC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP database queried from 2014 to 2018. Patients with NAC receipt were propensity-score matched into 1:3 ratio with controls using the greedy-matching algorithm and a caliper of 0.2. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to estimate the effect sizes.

RESULTS

A total of 1508 patients who underwent hepatectomy for iCCA were included. 706 patients remained after matching and balance were achieved. The NAC group had 110 (60.1%) complications vs. 289 (55.3%) complications in the non-NAC group (p = 0.29). NAC was not associated with worse 30-day postoperative complications [OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.87-1.76; p = 0.24]. Post-operative LOS in the NAC group was 8.56 days (mean, SD 7.4) vs. non-NAC group 9.27 days (mean, SD 8.41, p = 0.32). NAC was not associated with longer post-operative LOS [RR 0.93, 95% CI:0.80, 1.08; p = 0.32].

CONCLUSION

NAC may be safely administered without increasing the risk of 30-day complications or post-operative hospital LOS.

[Cholangiocarcinoma-Intrahepatic to hilar bile duct cancer]

BACKGROUND

In addition to conditioning measures in liver surgery, perioperative anti-tumor therapy is becoming increasingly more important in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

OBJECTIVE

Systematic literature review on the status of multimodal and in particular neoadjuvant therapy for CCA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature overview of the current scientific original and review articles.

RESULTS

Resection and rarely also liver transplantation are still the only curative treatment approaches for CCA in the non-distant metastatic stage; however, long-term results, e.g. in node positive tumors, are still unsatisfactory. Adjuvant chemotherapy is now standard but cannot be used in many patients. Neoadjuvant concepts include chemotherapy and local and locoregional procedures, such as radioembolization. Both are increasingly used in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) but rarely in perihilar CCA. Initial data show that this is very effective in iCCA to achieve secondary operability in primarily inoperable cases. In addition, based on the current literature, neoadjuvant therapy also seems justified in operable intrahepatic CCA with a high risk of recurrence (e.g. lymph node metastases).

CONCLUSION

There is a high potential for the use of multimodal therapy in CCA, which could further increase in the near future as a result of new therapeutic agents. Due to the lack of evidence clear recommendations cannot be given; however, it is becoming apparent that neoadjuvant therapy is gaining importance in iCCA and is already increasingly used as part of individual concepts in patients with a high risk of recurrence.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and causes major economic and health burdens throughout the world. Although the incidence of ICC is relatively low, an upward trend has been seen over the past few decades. Owing to the lack of specific manifestations and tools for early diagnosis, most ICC patients have relatively advanced disease at diagnosis. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to evaluate tumor biology and downstage these patients so that appropriate candidates can be selected for radical liver resection. However, even after radical resection, the recurrence rate is relatively high and is a main cause leading to death after surgery, which makes adjuvant therapy necessary. Because of its low incidence, studies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings of ICC are lagging compared with other types of malignancy. While standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens are not available in the current guidelines due to a lack of high-level evidence, some progress has been achieved in recent years. In this review, the available literature on advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in ICC are evaluated, and possible challenges and opportunities for clinical and translational investigations in the near future are discussed.

Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-A Multidisciplinary Approach

Simple Summary

This review discusses multimodality treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option and the central cornerstone of treatment. Adjuvant systemic treatment will be recommended after resection or in the palliative setting. Increasing knowledge of phenotypic subclassification and molecular profiling allows investigation of targeted therapies as (neo-)adjuvant treatment. High-dose brachytherapy, internal radiation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization are among the interventional treatment options being evaluated for unresectable iCC. Given the multiple options of multidisciplinary management, any treatment strategy should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board and treatment should be directed by a specialized treatment center.

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is distinguished as an entity from perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Recently, molecular profiling and histopathological features have allowed further classification. Due to the frequent delay in diagnosis, the prognosis for iCC remains poor despite major technical advances and multimodal therapeutic approaches. Liver resection represents the therapeutic backbone and only curative treatment option, with the functional residual capacity of the liver and oncologic radicality being deciding factors for postoperative and long-term oncological outcome. Furthermore, in selected cases and depending on national guidelines, liver transplantation may be a therapeutic option. Given the often advanced tumor stage at diagnosis or the potential for postoperative recurrence, locoregional therapies have become increasingly important. These strategies range from radiofrequency ablation to transarterial chemoembolization to selective internal radiation therapy and can be used in combination with liver resection. In addition, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies and immunotherapies based on molecular profiles can be applied. This review discusses multimodal treatment strategies for iCC and their differential use.

Oncogenic KRAS Requires Complete Loss of BAP1 Function for Development of Murine Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a primary biliary malignancy that harbors a dismal prognosis. Oncogenic mutations of KRAS and loss-of-function mutations of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) have been identified as recurrent somatic alterations in ICC. However, an autochthonous genetically engineered mouse model of ICC that genocopies the co-occurrence of these mutations has never been developed. By crossing Albumin-Cre mice bearing conditional alleles of mutant Kras and/or floxed Bap1, Cre-mediated recombination within the liver was induced. Mice with hepatic expression of mutant Kras^G12D alone (KA), bi-allelic loss of hepatic Bap1 (B^homoA), and heterozygous loss of Bap1 in conjunction with mutant Kras^G12D expression (B^hetKA) developed primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no discernible ICC. In contrast, mice with homozygous loss of Bap1 in conjunction with mutant Kras^G12D expression (B^homoKA) developed discrete foci of HCC and ICC. Further, the median survival of B^homoKA mice was significantly shorter at 24 weeks when compared to the median survival of ≥40 weeks in B^hetKA mice and approximately 50 weeks in B^homoA and KA mice (p < 0.001). Microarray analysis performed on liver tissue from KA and B^homoKA mice identified differentially expressed genes in the setting of BAP1 loss and suggests that deregulation of ferroptosis might be one mechanism by which loss of BAP1 cooperates with oncogenic Ras in hepato-biliary carcinogenesis. Our autochthonous model provides an in vivo platform to further study this lethal class of neoplasm.

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes level as a prognostic factor for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prediction by apparent diffusion coefficient

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a prognostic factor or an indicator of chemotherapy response for various malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of TILs in resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). We also investigated the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to predict TILs.

METHODS

We enrolled 23 patients with IHCC who underwent initial hepatic resection in Tokushima University Hospital from 2006 to 2017. We evaluated stromal TILs in the tumor marginal area and central area in surgical specimens. Patients were divided into low vs high stromal TILs groups. We analyzed the patients' clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, according to the degree of stromal TILs. We also analyzed the correlation between stromal TILs and the minimum ADC value.

RESULTS

Stromal TILs in the marginal area reflected overall survival more accurately than that in the central area. Additionally, marginal low TILs was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and portal vein invasion. Both overall- and disease-free survival rates in the marginal low TILs group were significantly worse than those in the marginal high TILs group (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, marginal low TILs were an independent prognostic factor for both overall- and disease-free survival (P < 0.05), and marginal low TILs were significantly associated with lower minimum ADC values (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Stromal TILs, especially in the marginal area, might demonstrate prognostic impact in patients with IHCC. Moreover, the ADC values from MRI may predict TILs in IHCC tumor tissue.

Primary tumor resection improves survival in patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a population study

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of surgery on the survival and prognosis of patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Patients with multifocal ICCA were selected from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in survival between the surgery group and the non-surgery group. We applied the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In total, 580 patients were enrolled in our study, including 151 patients who underwent surgery and 429 patients who did not. The median survival time of surgical patients was longer than non-surgical patients (OS: 25 months vs. 8 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 40 months vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year survival rate in the surgery group was significantly higher than those in the non-surgery group (5-year OS rate: 12.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate:26.91% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the OS (HR:0.299, 95% CI: 0.229–0.390, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR:0.305, 95% CI:0.222–0.419, p < 0.001) of patients undergoing surgical resection were significantly improved. Meanwhile, after propensity score matching (PSM) of the original data, we come to the same conclusion.