Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group

Sarculator: how to improve further prognostication of all sarcomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prognostication of soft tissue sarcomas is challenging due to the diversity of prognostic factors, compounded by the rarity of these tumors. Nomograms are useful predictive tools that assess multiple variables simultaneously, providing estimates of individual likelihoods of specific outcomes at defined time points. Although these models show promising predictive ability, their use underscores the need for further methodological refinement to address gaps in prognosis accuracy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ongoing efforts focus on improving prognostic tools by either enhancing existing models based on established parameters or integrating novel prognostic markers, such as radiomics, genomic, proteomic, and immunologic factors. Artificial intelligence is a new field that is starting to be explored, as it has the capacity to combine and analyze vast and intricate amounts of relevant data, ranging from multiomics information to real-time patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

The integration of these innovative markers and methods could enhance the prognostic ability of nomograms such as Sarculator and ultimately enable more accurate and individualized healthcare. Currently, clinical variables continue to be the most significant and effective factors in terms of predicting outcomes in patients with STS. This review firstly introduces the rationale for developing and employing nomograms such as Sarculator, secondly, reflects on some of the latest and ongoing methodological refinements, and provides future perspectives in the field of prognostication of sarcomas.

Initial local resection versus early referral for spermatic cord sarcoma: Any impact on treatment timelines and oncological outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

Spermatic cord sarcomas are exceedingly rare, often misdiagnosed and subsequently improperly treated at local hospitals. This retrospective study looked at the oncological outcomes of spermatic cord sarcoma cases managed with curative intent resection at a tertiary referral sarcoma centre. We specifically studied how initial inadequate resections impact the oncologic outcomes compared to primary tumour resections at the reference centre.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen consecutive patients affected by primary, localized spermatic cord sarcoma surgically managed at our reference centre from January 2001 through January 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were local relapse free (LRFS), distant metastasis free (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). These outcomes were evaluated with multi-nomial logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models for a co-relation to known patient, tumour and treatment-related prognostic factors, including a prior inadequate resection and time from diagnosis to a complete oncologic resection as independent variables. Secondarily, we compared the above variables and treatment intervals among the subgroups of primary versus re-resection surgery.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 54 months (IQR 25-105), 12 patients (10.2%) developed local recurrence (LR) and 14 (11.6%) had distant metastasis (DM). 5-year local relapse (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 89.3% and 86.5%, respectively. Higher tumour grade and size were associated with a worse DMFS (p=<0.05). Likewise, marginal (R1) resection correlated with an inferior LRFS (p=< 0.05). Eighty-four patients (71.2%) had their initial diagnosis established on an inadequate surgical excision performed in a local hospital, followed by a re-excision at our centre (Re-resection group). During the same period, 34 (28.8%) were managed primarily with biopsy and treatment at our reference centre (Primary-resection group). The two groups had statistically significant differences in tumour size, histopathology, surgery duration, rate of postoperative complication and R0 resection (p < 0.005). Additionally, the difference in time intervals to achieve the treatment targets was statistically insignificant and did not correlate to the risk of recurrence as an independent variable. Residual disease was present in 51.2 % (n = 43) of the re-excision specimens. However, following a complete R0 resection, this did not correlate with a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.481).

CONCLUSION

Prompt referral to a tertiary centre, where multidisciplinary evaluation and sound oncologic resections are the standard of treatment, can align the OS and DFS of patients receiving incomplete surgery elsewhere to those treated primarily in referral centres. The primary determinant of prognosis remains surgical margin, tumour size and grade.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

New Sarculator Prognostic Nomograms for Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Case Volume Does Matter

OBJECTIVE

To update the current Sarculator retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) prognostic nomograms considering the improvement in patient prognosis and the case volume effect.

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with primary RPS has been increasing over time, and the volume-outcome relationship has been well recognized. Nevertheless, the specific impact on prognostic nomograms is unknown.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients with primary localized RPS treated at 8 European and North American sarcoma reference centers between 2010 and 2017 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥13 cases/year) and low-volume centers (LVC, <13 cases/year). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariable analyses for OS and DFS were performed. The nomograms were updated by recalibration. Nomograms performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (Harrell C index) and calibration (calibration plot).

RESULTS

The HVC and LVC groups comprised 857 and 244 patients, respectively. The median annual primary RPS case volume (interquartile range) was 24.0 in HVC (15.0-41.3) and 9.0 in LVC (1.8-10.3). Five-year OS was 71.4% (95% CI: 68.3%-74.7%) in the HVC cohort and 63.3% (56.8%-70.5%) in the LVC cohort ( P =0.012). Case volume was associated with both OS (LVC vs. HVC hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, P =0.011) and DFS (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.57-2.37, P <0.001) at multivariable analyses. When applied to the study cohorts, the Sarculator nomograms showed good discrimination (Harrell C index between 0.68 and 0.73). The recalibrated nomograms showed good calibration in the HVC group, whereas the original nomograms showed good calibration in the LVC group.

CONCLUSIONS

New nomograms for patients with primary RPS treated with surgery at high-volume versus low-volume sarcoma reference centers are available in the Sarculator app.

What is the association of preoperative biopsy with recurrence and survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma? A systematic review by the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association clinical practice guidelines working party

Preoperative biopsy for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) enables appropriate multidisciplinary treatment planning. A systematic review of literature from 1990 to June 2022 was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model to evaluate the local recurrence and overall survival of preoperative biopsy compared to those that had not. Of 3192 studies screened, five retrospective cohort studies were identified. Three reported on biopsy needle tract seeding, with only one study reporting biopsy site recurrence of 2 %. Two found no significant difference in local recurrence and one found higher 5-year local recurrence rates in those who had not been biopsied. Three studies reported overall survival, including one with propensity matching, did not show a difference in overall survival. In conclusion, preoperative core needle biopsy of RPS is not associated with increased local recurrence or adverse survival outcomes.

Short- and long-term post-nephrectomy outcomes for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high-volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Multivisceral en bloc resection with the ipsilateral kidney is commonly performed in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). We evaluated the effect of nephrectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RLPS.

METHODS

Data from a prospectively maintained database of the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were analyzed. We classified the RLPS patients who underwent surgery into nephrectomy group (NP) and non-nephrectomy group (non-NP). Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Postoperative renal function outcomes, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed to compare short-term outcomes after nephrectomy. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to oncological benefits.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, patients in the NP group had significantly higher postoperative eGFR and CKD stages, but none required dialysis. Patients between NP and non-NP had a comparable major morbidity (p = 0.820) and 60-day mortality (p = 0.475). Patients in the NP group had a higher 5-year LRFS rates than those in the non-NP group (34.5 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015), and similar 5-year OS rates (52.4 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.401). Nephrectomy was an independent risk factor for LRFS, but not for major morbidity or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

RLPS resection with nephrectomy is related to a mild progression of renal impairment; however, dialysis is rare. En bloc nephrectomy for complete resection of RLPS is safe and improves local control.

Progress in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Management: Surgical and Radiotherapy Approaches

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), aiming for complete excision, yet the complexity of RPS with its proximity to vital structures continues to lead to high local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Thus, the role of radiotherapy (RT) continues to be refined to improve local control, which remains an important goal to prevent RPS recurrence. The recently completed global randomized trial to evaluate the role of surgery with and without preoperative RT - STRASS1, did not demonstrate a significant overall benefit for neoadjuvant RT based on the pre-specified definition of abdominal recurrence-free survival, however, sensitivity analysis using a standard definition of local recurrence and analysis of outcomes by compliance to the RT protocol suggests histology-specific benefit in well- and some de-differentiated liposarcomas. Ultimately, multidisciplinary collaboration and personalized approaches that consider histological sarcoma types and patient-specific factors are imperative for optimizing the therapeutic strategy in the management of RPS.

Surgical outcomes of patients with inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Primary vascular leiomyosarcomas are incredibly rare and have a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava (IVC) leiomyosarcoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of IVC leiomyosarcoma resections performed at a single tertiary care hospital from 2014 to 2023. A total of 13 cases were analyzed, including 10 women and 3 men. The presenting symptoms, tumor characteristics, operative management, postoperative complications, and survival rates were assessed for each patient.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 59 years (quartile [Q]1, 52 years; Q3, 68 years). The median tumor size was 7.0 cm (Q1, 6 cm; Q3, 12 cm). The median mitotic rate was 6 per 10 high-power fields (Q1, 2.5; Q3, 15.5). All 13 patients underwent grossly negative tumor resection, with 9 (69%) having microscopically negative margins (R0). No patient had lymph node involvement. The IVCs were managed with ligation in four patients for tumors already occluding the IVC and bovine pericardial patch angioplasty in seven patients or primary repair in two patients for patent IVCs. Concomitant right nephrectomy was performed in seven patients. Left renal vein ligation was performed in three patients, but no left nephrectomies were performed. Significant postoperative complications included one patient with lower extremity compartment syndrome, two patients with severe leg swelling, and one patient with arm swelling. The 30-day mortality rate was zero. Using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, disease-specific survival was estimated to be 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection is a feasible and effective oncologic treatment option for patients with IVC leiomyosarcoma. The IVC can be safely managed by ligation, primary repair, or patch angioplasty, depending on the prior patency of the IVC.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America

BACKGROUND

The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort.

METHODS

Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test.

RESULTS

Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

Advancements in Diagnosis and Multimodal Treatment Strategies for Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) encompass both benign and malignant entities, constituting ~0.1% to 0.2% of all malignant tumors, of which 70% to 80% manifest malignancy. Predominantly, retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent the most prevalent subtype among RPT. With over 70 histologic forms identified, liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas emerge as the primary constituents of RPS. Accurate diagnosis of RPTs necessitates preoperative core-needle biopsy and comprehensive imaging assessment. The current staging protocol for RPS relies on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification. Surgical excision remains the established gold standard for treating RPS. Therapeutic approaches vary according to the underlying pathophysiology. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibit efficacy in managing metastatic and recurrent unresectable RPS, their role in primary RPS remains unresolved, necessitating further clinical trials for validation. Concurrently, ongoing research explores the potential of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research, delineating diagnostic pathways and optimal therapeutic strategies for RPT.

Influence of nutritional status and body composition on postoperative events and outcome in patients treated for primary localized retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, commonly presented as a large tumour mass at time of diagnosis. We investigated the impact of body composition on outcome in patients operated on for primary localized RPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data for all patients operated on for primary RPS at our institution between 1999 and 2020. Preoperative skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue area (VAT and SAT) and muscle radiation attenuation (MRA) were calculated using computed tomography scans at the level of third lumbar vertebra. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria were applied to define myopenia. Using maximum log-rank statistic method we determined the optimal cut-off values of body composition parameters. Myosteatosis was defined based on determined MRA cut-offs.

RESULTS

In total 58 patient were eligible for the study. With a median follow-up of 116 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 66.8% and 77.6%, respectively. Patients with myopenia had significantly lower 5-year OS compared to non-myopenic (p = 0.009). Skeletal muscle index and subcutaneous adipose tissue index predicted LRFS on univariate analysis (p = 0.052 and p = 0.039, respectively). In multivariate analysis high visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) independently predicted higher postoperative complication rate (89.2% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008). Myosteatosis was associated with higher postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopenia affected survival, but not postoperative outcome in RPS. Visceral obesity, VSR (> 0.26) and myosteatosis were associated with higher postoperative morbidity. VSR was better prognostic factor than VAT in RPS.

Robotic resection of left renal vein with preservation of left kidney for leiomyosarcoma: Case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Radical surgical resection with negative margins is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal vascular leiomyosarcomas. Given the retroperitoneal location of these tumors, open surgery is, historically, the chosen surgical approach, however, it is burdened with high postoperative morbidity. In selected cases, the small dimension of the tumor and a favorable location, allow to perform a minimally invasive treatment.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 67-year-old female patient with a diagnosis of a leiomyosarcoma arising from the left renal vein underwent a robotic resection of the left renal vein with preservation of the left kidney and a relative outflow trough the gonadal vessels. The patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day without any complications and there was no tumor recurrence noted during the 24-month follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Vascular retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas are very rare tumors requiring a complete en bloc gross tumor resection in order to achieving microscopically negative margins on the vein of origin. Thanks to the preoperative histological diagnosis and radiological study of the neoplasm, it was possible to proceed to a highly personalized and minimally invasive treatment with respect of oncological criteria.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, a minimally invasive surgery of vascular leiomyosarcoma could be a feasible and safe treatment option.

Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma of the scalp - A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) of the scalp is a rare tumour which is usually slow growing, but occasionally displays rapid growth and has a low rate of local recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, with or without radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to describe the surgical approach and the additional benefit of radiotherapy to the treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with PDS of the scalp that underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2021 (n = 24). Treatment variables including depth of resection (superficial or deep to the galea aponeurotica) and adjuvant radiotherapy were investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in this study. Median age was 80 (range, 52-95), with a median ASA score of 3 (2-3). Sixteen (66.6 %) patients underwent surgical resection including the galea, while the rest (n = 8) did not or was not known. Radiotherapy was given in 7 (29 %) patients in which only 3 (12.5 %) were in the galeal resection group. Reasons for radiotherapy administration were concomitant SCC found at the same area of resection and close margins. In a median follow-up of was 26.2 months (range, 13.6-102.5) there was only one recurrence event.

CONCLUSIONS

PDS of the scalp can be safely managed with a surgical resection if clear surgical margins are achieved without radiotherapy with good oncological outcomes.

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous core needle biopsy of retroperitoneal tumours

BACKGROUND

Histologic subtype of cancer guides treatment sequencing and the extent of surgery for retroperitoneal tumours (RPTs) but concerns persist regarding percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB).

OBJECTIVE

Endpoints were the incidence of early complications, needle tract seeding (NTS) after CNB, diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2022, data from patients with RPT who underwent a CNB and who operated on at Institut Curie were collected. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and microscopic analysis of both CNB and surgical specimens to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CNB (quantified using positive and negative predictive values, PPV/NPV).

RESULTS

313 patients underwent CNB. In 10/326 (3 %) procedures, minor complications were observed. One of 212 (0.47 %) resected RPSs exhibited a local recurrence compatible with NTS. Microscopic analysis of CNB specimens allowed the classification of tumours between groups of cancers and benign/intermediate mesenchymal tumours in 307/313 (98 %) patients. Among the 204 patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma, the overall concordance between CNB and final pathology following resection was 178/204 (87.2 %). The respective PPVs of solitary fibrous tumour, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma were 100 %, 98 %, 97 % and 68 %, respectively. The diagnosis of a high-grade (G 2-3) sarcoma resulted in a high specificity (97 %) and PPV (98 %) but low sensitivity (76 %).

CONCLUSIONS

CNB allowed the classification of RPT in the vast majority of patients with a low morbidity rate. Concordance with final diagnosis was high for sarcomas with the exception of well-differentiated liposarcoma. As a result, CNB results should be integrated with imaging/radiomics by multidisciplinary tumour boards.

Analysis of recurrence and metastasis patterns and prognosis after complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma

Objective

To analyze the recurrence and metastasis patterns and prognosis after complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Methods

The clinical postoperative follow-up data and results of patients who underwent complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma from September 10, 2014, to September 8, 2021, at Hebei Medical University hospital were collected retrospectively.

Results

A total of 60 patients with complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, including 33 cases of retroperitoneal liposarcoma recurrence, 2 cases of liver metastasis, and 1 case of lung metastasis, were included. The results showed that 100% of the recurrent sites were located in the primary region of the tumor, with most recurrences located near the kidney, paracolic sulci, and iliac vessels. Three patients had distant metastasis without obvious recurrence on imaging examination. The pathological type of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, Ki67 expression, and presence of serum albumin were risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. The malignancy and Ki67 expression were independent risk factors for recurrence and metastasis as well as for overall survival of patients undergoing complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Conclusion

Complete resection remains the most effective method to treat retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Patients with pathological types of retroperitoneal liposarcoma showing dedifferentiation, pleomorphism, mixed type, and high Ki67 expression should be closely monitored and observed after complete resection, especially for imaging changes in the primary tumor area.

Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is a rare and heterogenous disease for which surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. However, the local recurrence rate is much higher than in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities since wide resection is usually unfeasible in RPS due to its large size, indistinct tumour borders, anatomical constraints and the thinness of the overlying peritoneum. Local recurrence is the leading cause of death for low-grade RPS, whereas high-grade tumours are prone to distant metastases. In recent decades, the role of emerging therapeutic strategies, such as more extended surgery and (neo)adjuvant treatments to improve oncological outcome in primary localised RPS, has been extensively investigated. In this review, the recent data on the evolving multidisciplinary management of primary localised RPS are comprehensively discussed. The heterogeneity of RPS, with their different histological subtypes and biological behaviour, renders a standard therapeutic 'one-size-fits-all' approach inappropriate, and treatment should be modified according to histological type and malignancy grade. There is sufficient evidence that frontline extended surgery with compartmental resection including all ipsilateral retroperitoneal fat and liberal en bloc resection of adjacent organs and structures, even if they are not macroscopically involved, increases local tumour control in low-grade sarcoma and liposarcoma, but not in leiomyosarcoma for which complete macroscopic resection seems sufficient. Additionally, preoperative radiotherapy is not indicated for all RPSs, but seems to be beneficial in well-differentiated liposarcoma and grade I/II dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and probably in solitary fibrous tumour. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-grade RPS remains unclear from retrospective data and is subject of the ongoing randomised STRASS 2 trial, from which the results are eagerly awaited. Personalised, histology-tailored multimodality treatment is promising and will likely further evolve as our understanding of the molecular and genetic characteristics within RPS improves.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A systematic review and clinical practice guidelines from the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association

While surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localised retroperitoneal sarcoma, the use of radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the role of RT for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic review using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome model from 1990 to 2022 identified 66 studies (a mixture of preoperative and postoperative RT); one randomised controlled trial (RCT) with two publications, 18 registry studies, and 46 retrospective studies. In the RCT of preoperative RT, there was no difference in local/abdominal recurrence. The pooled analysis of this RCT and a retrospective study showed a significant abdominal recurrence free survival benefit with preoperative RT in low grade liposarcoma. The RCT and the majority of retrospective series found RT did not improve recurrence free survival (11 of 16 no difference in combined local and distant RFS, 11 of 13 no difference in distant metastasis free survival), disease specific survival (9 of 12 studies) or overall survival (33 of 49 studies). The majority of studies found no association between RT and perioperative morbidity. In summary, preoperative RT may improve local control for low grade (well-differentiated or grades 1-2 dedifferentiated) liposarcoma, but not other histological subtypes. There is no strong evidence that perioperative RT provides an overall survival benefit. Patients with low grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma can be considered for preoperative RT to improve abdominal recurrence free survival. The rationale and level of evidence in this scenario should be carefully discussed by the multidisciplinary team with patients. RT should not be routinely recommended for other histological subtypes.

Nomogram development and external validation for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) comprises over 70 histologic subtypes, yet there are limited studies that have developed prognostic nomograms for RPS patients to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The objective of this study was to construct prognostic nomograms for predicting OS and CSS in RPS patients.

METHODS

We identified a total of 1166 RPS patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and an additional 261 cases were collected from a tertiary cancer center. The study incorporated various clinicopathological and epidemiologic features as variables, and prediction windows for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were set at 3, 5, and 7 years. Multivariable Cox models were utilized to develop the nomograms, and variable selection was performed using a backward procedure based on the Akaike Information Criterion. To evaluate the performance of the nomograms in terms of calibration and discrimination, we used calibration plots, coherence index, and area under the curve.

FINDINGS

The study included 818 patients in the development cohort, 348 patients in the internal validation cohort, and 261 patients in the external validation cohort. The backward procedure selected the following variables: age, French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) grade, pre-/postoperative chemotherapy, tumor size, primary site surgery, and tumor multifocality. The validation results demonstrated that the nomograms had good calibration and discrimination, with C-indices of 0.76 for OS and 0.81 for CSS. Calibration plots also showed good consistency between the predicted and actual survival rates. Furthermore, the areas under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves for the 3-, 5-, and 7-year OS (0.84, 0.82, and 0.78, respectively) and CSS (0.88, 0.88, and 0.85, respectively) confirmed the accuracy of the nomograms.

INTERPRETATION

Our study developed accurate nomograms to predict OS and CSS in patients with RPS. These nomograms have important clinical implications and can assist healthcare providers in making informed decisions regarding patient care and treatment options. They may also aid in patient counseling and stratification in clinical trials.

Six Surgical Stages in the Resection of Primary Right Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: A Standardized Comprehensive Approach

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the treatment mainstay in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), a frontline comprehensive approach based on tumor removal en bloc with adherent viscera is mandatory especially for liposarcoma, where the normal retroperitoneal fat is undistinguishable from the well-differentiated tumor component.1-5 In this video, a reproducible and standardized six-stage approach to a primary right retroperitoneal liposarcoma is presented.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 23-cm right retroperitoneal, well-differentiated liposarcoma was diagnosed in a 68-year-old female patient in December 2021. The tumor involved the right kidney and adrenal gland; displacing anteriorly the right colon, the duodenum, and the pancreatic head; and invading part of the ipsilateral psoas muscle. After the publication of the STRASS trial and STREXIT results,6,7 neoadjuvant radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with stable disease. Virtual 3D reconstruction of regional anatomy by Visible Patient was performed preoperatively.

RESULTS

The patient underwent right retroperitoneal mass resection en bloc with ipsilateral kidney and adrenal gland, colon, psoas muscle, and portion of ipsilateral diaphragm. Of note, the resection of the psoas muscle was performed to obtain a safe posterior margin and accomplish a better clearance of fat of the posterior abdominal wall. This can be limited to the psoas fascia whenever the tumor is not adherent to it. A six-stage approach was performed, as described in the supplementary video file.

CONCLUSIONS

RPS resection is complex and requires a broad range of surgical expertise. A staged approach that can be followed in virtually all cases is highly recommended to achieve an optimal tumor resection.

Aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and completeness of surgical resection is critical to achieve local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En-bloc resection of adjacent organs, including major abdominal vessels, is often required to achieve negative margins. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant studies published from inception up to August 1, 2022. We performed a systematic review of the available studies to assess the safety and long-term survival results of vascular resection for RPS.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 23 studies for our review. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with primary iliocaval leiomyosarcoma was 3% (11/359), and the major complication rate was 13%. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after the follow-up period varied between 15% and 52%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 25 to 78%. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with RPSs receiving vascular resection was 3%, and the major complication rate was 27%. The RFS rates after the follow-up period were 18-86%, and the 5-year OS rates varied between 50% and 73%. There were no significant differences in the rates of RFS (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74-1.19; p = 0.945) and OS (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.66-1.36; p = 0.774) between the extended resection group and tumour resection alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate preparation and proper management, for patients with RPSs involving major vessels, aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection can achieve R0/R1 resection and improve survival.

Clinical application of real-time PET/CT guided targeted retroperitoneal masses biopsy in diagnosing malignant tumors

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility, safety, and clinical application value based on the fusion image of 18 F-FDG PET/CT, for guiding retroperitoneal puncture biopsy technology and to determine the diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses in diagnosing malignant tumors.

METHODS

From March 2019 to January 2023, 42 patients underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging and were found to have retroperitoneal lesions that required definite diagnosis; 22 were male, 20 were female, and the average age was(59.17 ± 13.23) years. According to the fused 18 F-FDG PET/CT tomographic image, the target point with the highest metabolic activity, the safest, and expected maximum sample size was selected. CT scans were acquired with the same machine and fused with 18 F-FDG PET, guiding the puncture biopsy needle to approach the expected target zone, enabling timely delivery of pathological and immunohistochemical examination of the biopsy. Success rate, total examination time, biopsy operation time, complications, CT radiation dose, pathological, and immunohistochemical results were recorded.

RESULTS

All 42 patients were sampled successfully with the successful rate being 100%. The site of sampling of 42 patients accurately targeted the highest metabolic activity, the safest, and the expected maximum sample size. All 42 patients received clear diagnosis (25 cases of malignant tumors and cases of 17 benign tissues). 15 cases of patients had a change in clinical diagnosis, accounting for 35.7% of all patients, and affecting subsequent treatment plans. The average total examination time for patients was (41.3 ± 7.3) minutes, and the biopsy operation time was (29.1 ± 8.7) minutes. The effective radiation dose generated by the entire examination generated by CT guidance was (2.0 ± 0.5) mSv; no severe complications occurred in the patients.

CONCLUSION

Real-time-guided retroperitoneal puncture biopsy based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT fusion image is safe, accurate, and feasible, and can provide patients of retroperitoneal mass with clear pathological diagnosis and immunohistochemical evaluation.

Bilateral Renal Auto-Transplantation for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Is It Underutilized?

Sarcomas are a rare tumor of mesenchymal origin. The liposarcoma is the most common sarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Liposarcomas are typically low grade, and present at an advanced stage and a large size. We report a case of a large retroperitoneal liposarcoma, approximately 50 kg, encasing both kidneys, which was managed via a two-stage resection and staged renal auto-transplantation into the intra-peritoneal pelvis. The patient maintained normal renal function throughout, and remains disease free two years post-resection. Renal auto-transplantation with pelvic placement may facilitate improved margin-free resection. Renal relocation may allow the use of curative-intent ablative therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and radiation in cases of retroperitoneal recurrence.

Assessment of inter-centre agreement across multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Decision-making in the management of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma is complex and requires input from a number of different specialists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of agreement in terms of resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected across different retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings.

METHODS

The CT scans and clinical information of 21 anonymized retroperitoneal sarcoma patients were sent to all of the retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings in Great Britain, which were asked to give an opinion about resectability, treatment allocation, and organs proposed to be resected. The main outcome was inter-centre reliability, which was quantified using overall agreement, as well as the chance-corrected Krippendorff's alpha statistic. Based on the latter, the level of agreement was classified as: 'slight' (0.00-0.20), 'fair' (0.21-0.40), 'moderate' (0.41-0.60), 'substantial' (0.61-0.80), or 'near-perfect' (>0.80).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were reviewed at 12 retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings, giving a total of 252 assessments for analysis. Consistency between centres was only 'slight' to 'fair', with rates of overall agreement and Krippendorff's alpha statistics of 85.4 per cent (211 of 247) and 0.37 (95 per cent c.i. 0.11 to 0.57) for resectability; 80.4 per cent (201 of 250) and 0.39 (95 per cent c.i. 0.33 to 0.45) for treatment allocation; and 53.0 per cent (131 of 247) and 0.20 (95 per cent c.i. 0.17 to 0.23) for the organs proposed to be resected. Depending on the centre that they had attended, 12 of 21 patients could either have been deemed resectable or unresectable, and 10 of 21 could have received either potentially curative or palliative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-centre agreement between retroperitoneal sarcoma multidisciplinary team meetings was low. Multidisciplinary team meetings may not provide the same standard of care for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma across Great Britain.

Primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A comparison of survival outcomes in specialist and non-specialist sarcoma centres

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines outline that patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) should be managed within specialist sarcoma centres (SSC). There is, however, a paucity of population-based data detailing incidence and outcomes in these patients. Hence, we aimed to evaluate patterns of care among RPS patients in England and compare outcomes for those undergoing surgery in high-volume specialist sarcoma centres (HV-SSC), low-volume SSC (LV-SSC), and non-SSC (N-SSC).

METHODS

Data on patients diagnosed with primary RPS between 2013 and 2018 were extracted from NHS Digital's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service using the national cancer registration dataset. Diagnostic pathways, treatment, and survival outcomes were compared between HV-SSC, LV-SSC, and N-SSC. Uni- and multivariate analyses were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 1878 patients diagnosed with RPS, 1120 (60%) underwent surgery within 12 months of diagnosis, with 847 (76%) operated on at SSC; of these, 432 patients (51%) were operated on in HV-SSC, and 415 (49%) in LV-SSC. One- and 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) rates for patients undergoing surgery in N-SSC were 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.8-75.7) and 42.0% (CI: 35.9-47.9), compared to 85.0% (CI: 81.1-88.1) and 51.7% (CI: 46.6-56.6) in LV-SSC (p < 0.01), and 87.4% (CI: 83.9-90.2) and 62.8% (CI: 57.9-67.4) in HV-SSC, (p < 0.01). After adjusting for patient- and treatment-related factors, patients treated in HV-SSC were found to have significantly longer OS than those treated at LV-SSC, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.78 (CI: 0.62-0.96, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RPS undergoing surgery in HV-SSC have significantly better survival outcomes than those treated in N-SSC and L-SSC.

Significant Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

The safety of multivisceral resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma is an issue. Previous reports have investigated its associations with the pattern of resection and factors recognized mostly per operatively.

METHODS

All consecutive RPS resections from May 2015 to April 2022 were studied retrospectively with respect to adverse events. Two univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between severe adverse events and factors recognized pre- and per operatively. Associations of adverse events with overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR) were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 265 surgical interventions corresponding to 251 patients were recorded (38 RPS surgeries/year). Severe postoperative adverse events (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 50 patients (18.9%), 15 (5.6%) patients underwent an iterative laparotomy, and 6 patients (2.3%) died within 90 days. On multivariate analysis including all parameters known preoperatively, male sex, performance status, dedifferentiated liposarcoma histology, and low serum albumin level were found to be significant predictors of major complications, whereas the timing of surgery and preoperative treatment were not. On univariate analysis including all per operative parameters, transfusion requirement, operative time, number of digestive anastomoses, and pancreas and/or major arterial resection were found to entail higher operative risk. On multivariate analysis, only transfusion requirement was significant. There was no impact of postoperative adverse events on OS or LR.

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition of preoperative parameters that impact safety could mitigate the extent of the surgery, specifically the resection of adherent organs not overtly invaded. For the best decision, this surgery should be performed in referral centers.

Deciding individual treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare mesenchymal tumors that account for only 0.1-0.2% of all malignancies. Management of this disease is challenging, and resection remains the cornerstone of treatment. Ongoing international collaboration has expanded our knowledge of this disease, allowing for a more personalized approach to RPS patients resulting in improved survival over time. Due to the heterogeneity of RPS, with differing recurrence patterns and sensitivities to neoadjuvant therapies based on histology and grade, management of RPS should be tailored to the individual patient.

AREAS COVERED

Our review focuses on a histology-driven approach in the management of primary RPS. We searched relevant articles from 1993 to 2023 that investigated prognostic factors and treatment of patients with RPS and summarized recent advances and future directions in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Deeper understanding of the role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and ongoing trials investigating the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will potentially contribute to the development of individualized treatment pathways.

Organ Infiltration and Patient Risk After Multivisceral Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas

BACKGROUND

The extent of histological organ involvement (HOI) to organs and structures of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma may have prognostic implications. This study investigated incidence, characteristics, and risk association of HOI in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of patients who underwent multivisceral resection for primary liposarcoma (2009-2014) were retrospectively analyzed. HOI was the variable of interest and was classified into four degrees: absent (HOI-0), perivisceral (HOI-1), initial (HOI-2), and advanced (HOI-3). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic value of HOI was adjusted for preoperative treatment and the Sarculator nomogram score.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were included. HOI-0, HOI-1, HOI-2, and HOI-3 were detected in 9 (8.3%), 11 (10.1%), 43 (39.4%), and 46 (42.2%) patients. Median follow-up was 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 7.2-9.6 years]. There were 68 recurrences and 50 patient deaths observed, resulting in a 10-year OS and DFS of 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.9-62.1%] and 34.1% (95% CI 25.2-46.1%), respectively. Clinically relevant HOIs (HOI-2 and HOI-3) were found in 35/45 (77.8%) and 54/64 (84.4%) cases of well- and de-differentiated liposarcomas, respectively. On multivariable survival analysis, patients with HOI-3 had significantly shorter OS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.92; p = 0.012) and DFS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.23; p = 0.045), independently of the nomogram score (OS: HR 2.93; p < 0.001; DFS: HR 1.78; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial and advanced HOIs are frequently detected in both well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcomas, supporting that multivisceral resection may be needed. HOI stratifies the risk of patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Next questions in the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (RPS) are a group of rare, histologically distinct tumours with variable recurrence patterns depending on histological type. This review will discuss the growing body of evidence supporting histology-specific, multidisciplinary management and highlight areas of future research for patients with RPS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Histology-tailored surgery is the cornerstone of management in patients with localized RPS. Further efforts to develop resectability criteria and identify patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant treatment strategies will help standardize the treatment of patients with localized RPS. Surgery for local recurrence is well tolerated in selected patients and re-iterative surgery in liposarcoma (LPS) may be beneficial at the time of local recurrence. The management of advanced RPS holds promise with several trials currently investigating systemic treatment beyond conventional chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

The management of RPS has made significant progress over the past decade owing to international collaboration. Ongoing efforts to identify patients who will derive the most benefit from all treatment strategies will continue to advance the field of RPS.

Practical Management of Adult Ultra-Rare Primary Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Focus on Perivascular Epithelioid Tumours and Extraosseous Ewing Sarcoma

With the exception of well-differentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumour, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, the majority of the ≈70 histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma are defined as 'ultra-rare' sarcomas, with an incidence of ≤1-5/1,000,000 persons/year. For most of these ultra-rare RPS subtypes, diagnosis and treatment follows international guidelines for the management of more common RPS histologies, with en bloc surgical resection as the mainstay of curative treatment, and enrolment in clinical trials where possible. Because the treatment of RPS is heavily driven by histology, the surgeon must be familiar with specific issues related to the diagnosis and management of ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes. Expert radiological and surgeon reviews are required to differentiate similarly presenting tumours where surgery can be avoided (e.g., angiomyolipoma), or where upfront systemic therapy is indicated (e.g., extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma). Thus, the management of all retroperitoneal sarcomas should occur at a sarcoma referral centre, with a multidisciplinary team of experts dedicated to the surgical and medical management of these rare tumours. In this focused review, we highlight how diagnosis and management of the ultra-rare primary RPS histologies of malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa), extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES), extraosseous osteosarcoma (EOS), and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) critically diverge from the management of more common RPS subtypes.

Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma by the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors arising from mesenchymal cells. The incidence is estimated at five cases per 100,000 people per year. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for 10-15% of all STS, and their management depends on their anatomical characteristics and histotype. Due to their very low incidence, it is recommended that RPS be treated in reference centers and evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT). In Spain, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) brings together experts from various specialties to promote research on sarcomas and improve treatment results. This paper summarizes the GEIS recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with RPS.

Current management of benign retroperitoneal tumors

Benign retroperitoneal tumors (BRT) represent a rare group of heterogeneous diseases. The literature lacks high-quality evidence about the optimal management of BRT, and most of the information available takes the form of case reports or case series. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current management strategies for adult patients with BRT. A literature search using PubMed indexed articles was conducted and BRT were classified into five different biological subgroups: 1) lipomatous tumors, 2) smooth muscle tumors, 3) peripheral nerve sheath tumors, 4) myofibroblastic tumors, and 5) others. Tumors that are primarily pelvic in origin were excluded. Despite the significant heterogeneity of the disease, several generic considerations have emerged and can be applied to the management of BRT. Specifically, the risk of misdiagnosing a BRT with another pathology such as retroperitoneal sarcoma is notable. When encountered, suspected BRT should therefore be referred to a specialized sarcoma center. Multidisciplinary tumor boards, present at these centers, have a pivotal role in managing BRT. The decision of whether to offer surgery, nonsurgical treatment or a "watch-and-wait" approach should be made after multidisciplinary discussion, depending on tumor histology. Moving forward, collaborative research efforts dedicated to BRT remain crucial in gathering evidence and knowledge to further optimize patient care.

Histology-tailored multidisciplinary management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas

Until recently, the recommendation for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) was to perform a complete en-bloc gross excision, (neo) adjuvant treatments being options which were not validated by randomized studies, with a large discrepancy of use between centers. The heterogeneity of RPS, with their different biological behaviour, renders a homogenous therapeutic and surgical approach probably inappropriate. Recent studies, both surgical and dedicated to adjuvant treatments, allow refining these recommendations. This review summarizes recent advances and directions.

Special clinical scenarios in RPS: Involvement of great vessels and pancreas and penetration across natural foramina

The primary treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas is surgery. This requires a carefully planned, typically multivisceral, resection. A few complex scenarios that may arise include vascular involvement, pancreatic involvement, or herniation of the tumor into another compartment outside of the retroperitoneum. These scenarios must be anticipated before surgery to optimize preoperative preparation, minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality, and improve oncologic outcomes. Our aim is to highlight these clinically challenging anatomic presentations that can be encountered in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas (PSTS) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors. They have been usually analyzed with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), but actually have key differences. Due to their unique anatomic location, symptomatic presentation of PSTS may be more common than RPS. Adequate imaging approach is paramount for guiding differential diagnosis, while preoperative biopsy is mandatory, especially when preoperative treatment may be considered as initial approach. The most frequent histologic subtype is leiomyosarcoma, which is different as expected in the retroperitoneum where liposarcoma is the commonest histology. Also solitary fibrous tumor is commonly diagnosed in the pelvis. Surgical approach for PSTS differs from that for RPS mainly due to anatomic relations. Similarly, in the lack of definite evidence from specific trials about neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, the anatomic constraints to obtain wide margins in the pelvis as well as the expected functional outcome in case of organ resections should be factored into decision for individualized treatment offer. Vascular and genitourinary involvement are frequent, as well as herniation through pelvic foramina. For these reasons a multidisciplinary surgical team should always be considered. Early referral of these patients to high-volume centers is critical and may impact on survival, given that optimal initial resection is a major predictor of curative treatment. International consensus on PSTS treatment is advocated, similarly to the recent efforts realized for RPS.

How to treat liposarcomas located in retroperitoneum

Almost half of retroperitoneal (RP) sarcomas are liposarcomas (LPS). The large majority of RP LPS are either well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) or dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), these latter further classified according to grading in G2 and G3 DDLPS. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment to achieve local control and possibly cure in primary localized disease. Over the last decade, a better delineation of the different histology-specific patterns of failure and the development of nomograms predictors of outcome has led to a better management of these rare tumors, with a special focus on non-surgical treatments. Available evidences - although far from exhaustive - show that radiation therapy might have a role, if any, as neoadjuvant treatment in locally aggressive histologies (i.e. WDLPS and G2 DDLPS), while it does not seem beneficial for histologies with a higher metastatic risk (i.e. G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, instead, can be considered to reduce the risk of distant metastasis while waiting for the results of an ongoing RCT (STRASS-2) evaluating its effect in these tumors. However, given the rarity of these diseases and the subsequent lack of strong evidences to guide treatment, outcome improvement in these patients remains a challenge. Patients' referral to a sarcoma center where a dedicated specialized multidisciplinary team tailor optimal treatment on a case-by-case basis is crucial to ensure these patients the best outcome. Refining available nomograms - e.g including molecular variables - and identifying predictors of response/toxicity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy might be significantly helpful in tailoring treatments to the patient's characteristics. Also, new systemic agents are eagerly awaited for improving the management further.

CT and MR Imaging of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Practical Guide for the Radiologist

Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent around 10-16% of all sarcomas, with liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas being the most common subtypes. RPS have some peculiar characteristics, imaging appearances, worse prognosis, and complications compared to other locations of sarcoma. Commonly, RPS primarily present as large masses, progressively encasing adjacent structures, causing mass effect, and complications. RPS diagnosis is often challenging, and these tumors may be overlooked; however, failure to recognize RPS characteristics leads to a worse prognosis for the patients. Surgery is the only recognized curative treatment, but the anatomical constraints of the retroperitoneum limit the ability to achieve wide resection margins; therefore, these tumors have a high rate of recurrence, and require long-term follow-up. The radiologist has an important role in the diagnosis of RPS, the definition of their extent, and their follow-up. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, and, ultimately, to guarantee the best patient management. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding cross-sectional imaging features of patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, presenting tips and tricks to improve imaging diagnosis of RPS.

Preoperative Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in Patients with Retroperitoneal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Final Results of a Clinical Phase I/II Trial

BACKGROUND

To report the final results of a prospective, one-armed, single-center phase I/II trial (NCT01566123).

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 37 patients with primary or recurrent (N = 6) retroperitoneal sarcomas were enrolled. Treatment included preoperative IMRT of 45-50 Gy with a simultaneous integrated boost of 50-56 Gy, surgery and IORT. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) at 5 years. The most common histology was dedifferentiated liposarcoma (51%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (24%) and well-differentiated liposarcoma (14%). The majority of lesions were high-grade (FNCLCC G1: 30%, G2: 38%, G3: 27%, two missing). Five patients were excluded from LC analysis per protocol.

RESULTS

The minimum follow-up of the survivors was 62 months (median: 109; maximum 162). IORT was performed for 27 patients. Thirty-five patients underwent gross total resection; the pathological resection margin was mostly R+ (80%) and, less often, R0 (20%). We observed 10 local recurrences. The 5-year LC of the whole cohort was 59.6%. Eleven patients received a dose > 50 Gy plus IORT boost; LC was 64.8%; the difference, however, was not significant (p = 0.588). Of 37 patients, 15 were alive and 22 deceased at the time of final analysis. The 5-year OS was 59.5% (68.8% per protocol).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of a 5-year LC of 70% was not met. This might be explained by the inclusion of recurrent disease and the high rate of G3 lesions and leiomyosarcoma, which have been shown to profit less from radiotherapy. Stratification by grading and histology should be considered for future studies.

Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery should be performed by a surgical oncologist with sub-specialization in this disease and in the context of a multidisciplinary team of sarcoma specialists. For primary RPS, the goal of surgery is to achieve the complete en bloc resection of the tumor along with involved organs and structures to maximize the clearance of the disease. The extent of resection also needs to consider the risk of complications. Unfortunately, the overarching challenge in primary RPS treatment is that even with optimal surgery, tumor recurrence occurs frequently. The pattern of recurrence after surgery (e.g., local versus distant) is strongly associated with the specific histologic type of RPS. Radiation and systemic therapy may improve outcomes in RPS and there is emerging data studying the benefit of non-surgical treatments in primary disease. Topics in need of further investigation include criteria for unresectability and management of locally recurrent disease. Moving forward, global collaboration among RPS specialists will be key for continuing to advance our understanding of this disease and find more effective treatments.

Multivisceral resection of primary multifocal retroperitoneal sarcomas: a retrospective study from a high-volume sarcoma center

Background

Although surgery plays a key role in the treatment of the primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), there remain few reports on the primary multifocal RPS.

Aims

This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for the primary multifocal RPS in an effort to optimize the clinical management of this malignancy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 319 primary RPS patients who underwent radical resection from 2009 to 2021, with post-operative recurrence as the primary endpoint of this study. COX regression was performed to identify the risk factors for post-operative recurrence, and a comparison was made to baseline and prognostic differences between multivisceral resection (MVR) and non-MVR groups with multifocal disease.

Results

There were 31 (9.7%) patients with multifocal disease, the mean tumor burden placed on them was 24.1 ± 11.9 cm, and nearly half of the patients (48.4%) had MVR. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma accounted for 38.7%, 32.3%, and 16.1%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate reached 31.2% (95% CI, 11.2-51.2%) in the multifocal group and 51.8% (95% CI, 44.2-59.4%) in the unifocal group (P = 0.010). Age (heart rate [HR] = 0.916; P = 0.039) and complete resection (HR = 1.861; P = 0.043) were identified as the independent risk factors for the post-operative recurrence of multifocal primary RPS.

Conclusions

Regarding primary multifocal RPS, the overall treatment strategy can be adopted for the treatment of the primary RPS, and MVR remains effective in boosting the chance of disease control for a selected group of patients.

Relevance for Patients

This study is relevant to patients as it highlights the importance of receiving appropriate treatment for the primary RPS, especially for those with multifocal disease. The treatment options should be evaluated carefully to ensure that the patients receive the most effective treatment for their specific type and stage of RPS. The potential risk factors for post-operative recurrence should be well understood to minimize those risks. Ultimately, this study underscores the importance of ongoing research to optimize the clinical management of RPS and improve outcomes for patients.

Diagnostic accuracy of biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment for well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma

PURPOSE

Accurate histopathological grading of percutaneous biopsies is essential to guide adequate management of patients with suspected retroperitoneal liposarcoma. In this regard, however, limited reliability has been described. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to assess the diagnostic accuracy in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas and simultaneously investigate its impact on patients' survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reports of an interdisciplinary sarcoma tumor board between 2012 and 2022 were systematically screened for patients with well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma (DDLPS). Histopathological grading on pre-operative biopsy was correlated with corresponding postoperative histology. Additionally, patients' survival outcomes were examined. All analyses were performed in two subgroups: patients with primary surgery and patients with neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients met our inclusion criteria. Diagnostic accuracy of patients who underwent upfront resection (n = 32) was significantly inferior to patients with neoadjuvant treatment (n = 50) (66% versus 97% for WDLPS, p < 0.001; 59% versus 97% for DDLPS, p < 0.001). For patients with primary surgery, histopathological grading on biopsy and surgery was concordant in only 47% of cases. Sensitivity for detecting WDLPS was higher than for DDLPS (70% versus 41%). Higher histopathological grading in surgical specimens correlated with worse survival outcomes (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Histopathological grading of RPS may no longer be reliable after neoadjuvant treatment. The true accuracy of the percutaneous biopsy may need to be studied in patients who do not receive neoadjuvant treatment. Future biopsy strategies should aim to improve identification of DDLPS to inform patient management.

IOeRT in retroperitoneal sarcoma: Towards more organ preservation with comparable oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) present a surgical challenge with high rates of local recurrence (LR). We investigated the role of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) in reducing LR after surgical resection of RPS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for RPS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary academic referral center (n = 172). Patients included underwent surgical resection of their RPS and received IOeRT (n = 36) and were compared by case control matching to patients with similar tumor characteristics (recurrence status and tumor grade) that did not receive IOeRT (n = 36).

RESULTS

The median length of hospitalization was 8 days (range, 4-34) in the IOeRT group and 10 days (range, 2-42) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.25). The mean operating room (OR) time was 4h (±1.3) and 4h (±1.9) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups respectively, (p = 0.37). Complete resection with R0 margins was achieved in 30 patients (83.3%) and 24 patients (66.6%) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups, respectively (p = 0.1). R1 resection was achieved in 6 patients (16.6%) and 12 patients (33.3%) respectively, (p = 0.1). The resected organ weighted score was significantly different between the groups; score 0 observed in 19 (52.7%) patients in the IOeRT group and 3 (8.3%) in the non-IOeRT group (p < 0.001), score 1 observed in 7 (19.4%) in the IOeRT group and 17 (47.2%) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.012). The rate of severe complications (CD score>3) did not differ between the groups, 5 (13.8%) patients in the IOeRT group and 9 (25%) patients in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.23). No radiation associated complications were noted. The 2-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was 75.9% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.4). The 2-year IOeRT field recurrent free survival (IRFS) was 88.4% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IOeRT did not increase the rate of surgical complications and was associated with superior local control in the radiation field, improved organ preservation without an impact on overall survival.

Complex Vascular Resections for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are locally aggressive tumors that can compromise major vessels of the retroperitoneum including the inferior vena cava, aorta, or main tributary vessels. Vascular involvement can be secondary to the tumor's infiltrating growth pattern or primary vascular origin. Surgery is still the mainstay for curing this disease, and resection of RPSs may include major vascular resections to secure adequate oncologic results. Our improved knowledge in the tumor biology of RPSs, in conjunction with the growing surgical expertise in both sarcoma and vascular surgical techniques, has allowed for major vascular reconstructions within multi-visceral resections for RPSs with good perioperative results. This complex surgical approach may include the combined work of various surgical subspecialties.

Delayed gastric emptying after aggressive surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma - Incidence, characteristics, and risk factors

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after aggressive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) has rarely been described. This study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of DGE after surgery for RPS and explore its potential risk factors. Patients with RPS who had undergone surgery between January 2010 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. DGE was defined and graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and classified as primary or secondary to other complications. Patients with clinically relevant DGE (crDGE, grade B+C) were compared to those with no or mild DGE (grade A). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinicopathological and surgical parameters was performed to identify risk factors for crDGE. Of the 239 patients studied, 69 (28.9%) had experienced DGE and 54 (22.6%) had experienced crDGE. Patients with primary and secondary DGE accounted approximately half and half. The most common concurrent complications included abdominal infection, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and abdominal bleeding. Patients with crDGE were more likely to have multifocal tumors and the liposarcoma subtype, with a larger tumor size, longer operating time, more resected organs, and a history of combined resection of the stomach, pancreas, small intestine, and/or colon. In multivariate analysis, the tumor size, operating time, and combined pancreatic resection were independent risk factors for crDGE. In conclusion, the current results indicated that approximately one-fourth of patients experienced DGE after aggressive surgery for RPS and that DGE was primary or secondary to other underlying conditions. A large tumor involving long, difficult surgery and combined pancreatic resection highly predicted the incidence of crDGE. The prevention and management of DGE remain challenging.

Short- and long-term surgical outcomes of pancreatic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A long-term single-center experience of 90 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) en bloc with pancreas is challenging and controversial. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the impact of pancreatic resection (PR) and its different types on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RPS.

METHODS

Data from 242 consecutive patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were analyzed. Out of these, 90 patients underwent PR, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 31 and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 59.

RESULTS

Patients in the PR group had a higher major morbidity (37.8% vs. 14.5%) and mortality (8.9% vs. 1.3%) than those in the non-PR group, with a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (46.9% vs. 53.6%). Patients in the PD and DP groups had a slight difference in major morbidity (48.4% vs. 32.2%), mortality (6.4% vs. 10.2%), and 5-year OS rates (43.3% vs. 49.3%). The PR type was not an independent risk factor for major morbidity or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

PR in RPS resection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality with minimal influence on survival. Patients with RPS undergoing PD and DP showed slight differences in terms of safety and OS.

Percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors and the potential for needle tract seeding: technical considerations, current controversies, and outcomes

Multidisciplinary communication and planning between the musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic oncologist are essential for proper biopsy planning when a primary musculoskeletal malignancy is suspected. Image-guided percutaneous biopsy allows for real-time visualization of the biopsy needle and surrounding structures, combining high diagnostic accuracy with safety and cost-effectiveness. However, determining a surgically optimal biopsy trajectory for a mass can be technically challenging due to critical surrounding anatomy or challenging needle approach angles. Inappropriately placed biopsies can have serious repercussions on patient function and oncological survival. The potential for needle tract seeding and local recurrence after biopsy of sarcoma has been central to the debate regarding the need for excision of the biopsy tract. This multidisciplinary review highlights current controversies in the field, including the issue of core needle biopsy tracts and their excision, technical considerations and advances in image-guidance in the setting of challenging biopsies, advances in histopathological diagnostics with implications for targeted therapy in sarcoma, as well as surgical and oncological outcomes after needle tract biopsy.