Can 2-X-Ethanols Form Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonds?

For 2-X-ethanols, where X = F, OH, or NH₂, the gauche conformer is favored over the trans conformer by at least 2 kcal/mol. Initially, this preference, ΔE, was attributed to an intramolecular hydrogen bond, IMHB, between the OH and X groups. Over the years, this conclusion has been challenged by two major arguments. One claim is that the entirety of ΔE can be accounted for by the gauche effect. Against this, calculations using five different methods show that the maximum contribution of the gauche effect to ΔE is less than 1 kcal/mol. A second argument employs the quantum theory of atoms in molecules to contend that the absence of a bond critical point (BCP) between the OH and X groups in 2-X-ethanols denotes the lack of an IMHB. By looking at the 2-X-ethanols at fixed XCCO torsional angles ranging from 0° to 60°, it is shown that the BCP criterion is inconsistent with other properties such as energy, bond lengths, and stretching frequencies. These inconsistencies are removed when the theory of noncovalent interactions is used. The IMHBs in 2-X-ethanols are found to be similar in form but smaller in magnitude than their intermolecular counterparts. This work concludes that 2-X-ethanols form IMHBs.

Hydration structure of CO2-absorbed 2-aminoethanol studied by neutron diffraction with the 14N/15N isotopic substitution method

Neutron diffraction measurements were carried out for CO2-absorbed aqueous 11 mol % 2-aminoethanol (MEA) D2O solutions (corresponding to 30 wt % MEA solution) in order to obtain information on both the intramolecular structure and intermolecular hydration structure of the MEA carbamate molecule in the aqueous solution. Neutron scattering cross sections observed for (MEA)0.11(D2O)0.89, (MEA)0.11(D2O)0.89(CO2)0.06, and (MEA)0.11(D2O)0.89(DCl)0.11 solutions with different (14)N/(15)N ratios were used to derive the first-order difference function, ΔN(Q), which involves environmental structural information around the nitrogen atom of the MEA molecule. Intramolecular geometry and intermolecular hydration structure of MEA, protonated MEA (MEAD(+)), and MEA carbamate (MEA-CO2) molecules were obtained through the least-squares fitting of the observed Δ(N)(Q) in the high-Q region and the intermolecular difference function, Δ(N)(inter)(Q), respectively. In the aqueous solution, the MEA molecule takes the gauche conformation (dihedral angle, ∠NCCO = 45 ± 3°), suggesting that an intramolecular hydrogen bond is formed. On the other hand, values of the dihedral angle ∠NCCO determined for MEAD(+) and MEA-CO2 molecules were 193 ± 4° and 214 ± 8°, respectively. These results imply that the intermolecular hydrogen bonds are dominated for MEAD(+) and MEA-CO2 molecules. The intermolecular nearest neighbor N···O(D2O) distance for the MEA molecule was determined to be 3.13 ± 0.01 Å, which suggests weak intermolecular interaction between the amino-nitrogen atom of MEA and water molecules in the first hydration shell. The nearest-neighbor N···O(D2O) distances for MEAD(+) and MEA-CO2 molecules, 2.79 ± 0.03 and 2.87 ± 0.04 Å, clearly indicate strong hydrogen bonds are formed among the amino group of these molecules and neighboring water molecules.