Purification and characterization of pranlukast hydrolase from rat liver microsomes: the hydrolase is identical to carboxylesterase pI 6.2

Isolation, Characterization, and Toxicity Study of Stress Degradation Products of Pranlukast Hydrate

Pranlukast hydrate (PRN), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist (CysLT₁), is used to treat bronchial asthma. The objective of this study is to perform the isolation, characterization, and toxicity analysis of stress degradation products of PRN. In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the separation was achieved using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μ) column; the ammonium format buffer (50 mM), pH 4, with formic acid: acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) was used as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.25 mL/min; and the photodiode array detector was used for detection at 230 nm. The drug was subjected to stress degradation as per ICH Q1A (R2) and ICH Q1B guidelines. The drug was found to be labile in alkaline (62.48% degradation) and photolytic (liquid state) (7.67% degradation) conditions, whereas the drug was found to be stable in acidic, peroxide, photolytic (solid state), and thermal conditions. The characterization of the drug and its degradation products was achieved using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-quadrupole time of flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS), and the degradation mechanism was proposed. There were two degradation products observed in alkaline conditions (DP6 and DP9), whereas six novel degradation products were observed in photolytic degradation products (DP1, DP3, DP4, DP5, DP7, and DP10). The developed method was successfully validated as per the ICH Q2 (R1) guideline. The isolation of the alkaline degradation product DP9 was performed using preparative HPLC, and it was found to be 96.8% pure degradation product. The characterizations of the isolated degradation product (DP9) and procured impurity were performed using MS/MS, NMR, and FTIR. The mass of the procured impurity and DP9 were observed to be 404 and 500 Da, respectively. The in vitro cytotoxicity study of the procured impurity and DP9 was conducted using a 3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay using an A549 cell line, and they were found to be cytotoxic at concentrations above 62.5 and 250 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, an in silico toxicity study was performed to predict the toxicity of all the major characterized degradation products of PRN using admetSAR software version 2.0. DP1, DP2, DP6, and DP10 were found to be hepatotoxic, mutagenic according to the micronucleus test, and aquatic toxic. We can conclude that the drug should be kept away from the direct exposure of light and the toxicity levels of DP1, DP2, DP6, and DP10 should be reduced below 0.1% to avoid their toxic effect.

Interspecies variation of clopidogrel hydrolysis in liver microsomes from various mammals

Clopidogrel, a clinically used antiplatelet agent, can be readily hydrolyzed by human carboxylesterase 1A (CES1A) to release an inactive metabolite clopidogrel carboxylic acid (CCA). In this study, clopidogrel was used as a tool substrate to investigate the interspecies variation of clopidogrel hydrolysis in hepatic microsomes from various mammals including human and six laboratory animals (such as mouse, rat, rabbit, beagle dog, minipig and cynomolgus monkey). The results demonstrated that clopidogrel could be hydrolyzed into CCA by all tested hepatic microsomes from human or other mammals, but the hydrolytic rates greatly varied among species. Inhibition assays demonstrated that BNPP (an inactivator of mammalian CES) strongly inactivated clopidogrel hydrolytic activity in all tested hepatic microsomes, suggested that mammalian CES were major contributor(s) responsible for clopidogrel hydrolysis in hepatic preparations from all above-mentioned species. By contrast, the response of a reversible inhibitor of human CES1A on clopidogrel hydrolysis in these liver preparations varied significantly among different species. Moreover, the enzymatic kinetics and the apparent kinetic parameters of clopidogrel hydrolysis in hepatic microsomes from various animal species were evaluated and compared to each other. These findings provide crucial information for deeply understanding the differences in catalytic behaviors of mammalian CES, which will be very helpful for choosing suitable laboratory animal(s) for whole tests of CES1A substrate-drugs.

Difference in substrate specificity of carboxylesterase and arylacetamide deacetylase between dogs and humans

Carboxylesterase (CES) and arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) are the major enzymes responsible for the hydrolysis of various clinical drugs. Our recent study demonstrated that the identity of the responsible hydrolase can be roughly surmised based on the chemical structures of compounds in humans. Dogs are used for preclinical studies in drug development, but the substrate specificities of dog CES and AADAC remain to be clarified. The purpose of this study is to characterize their substrate specificities. We prepared recombinant dog CES1, CES2, and AADAC. p-Nitrophenyl acetate, a general substrate for esterases, was hydrolyzed by dog CES1 and AADAC, while it was not hydrolyzed by CES2. CES2 protein was not substantially detected in the recombinant system or in the dog liver and intestinal microsomes by Western blot using anti-human CES2 antibodies. In silico analyses demonstrated slight differences in the three-dimensional structures of dog CES2 and human CES2, indicating that dog CES2 might be unstable or inactive. By evaluating the hydrolase activities of 22 compounds, which are known to be substrates of human CES and/or AADAC, we found that the activities of dog recombinant CES1 and AADAC as well as dog tissue preparations for nearly all compounds were lower than those of human enzymes. The dog enzymes that were responsible for the hydrolysis of most compounds corresponded to the human enzymes, but the following differences were observed: oseltamivir, irinotecan, and rifampicin were not hydrolyzed in the dog liver or by any of the recombinant esterases and procaine, a human CES2 substrate, was hydrolyzed by dog CES1. In conclusion, the present study could provide new finding to facilitate our understanding of species differences in drug hydrolysis, which can facilitate drug development and drug safety evaluation.

Species differences in tissue distribution and enzyme activities of arylacetamide deacetylase in human, rat, and mouse

Human arylacetamide deacetylase (AADAC) is a major esterase responsible for the hydrolysis of clinical drugs such as flutamide, phenacetin, and rifampicin. Thus, AADAC is considered to be a relevant enzyme in preclinical drug development, but there is little information about species differences with AADAC. This study investigated the species differences in the tissue distribution and enzyme activities of AADAC. In human, AADAC mRNA was highly expressed in liver and the gastrointestinal tract, followed by bladder. In rat and mouse, AADAC mRNA was expressed in liver at the highest level, followed by the gastrointestinal tract and kidney. The expression levels in rat tissues were approximately 7- and 10-fold lower than those in human and mouse tissues, respectively. To compare the catalytic efficiency of AADAC among three species, each recombinant AADAC was constructed, and enzyme activities were evaluated by normalizing with the expression levels of AADAC. Flutamide and phenacetin hydrolase activities were detected by the recombinant AADAC of all species. In flutamide hydrolysis, liver microsomes of all species showed similar catalytic efficiencies, despite the lower AADAC mRNA expression in rat liver. In phenacetin hydrolysis, rat liver microsomes showed approximately 4- to 6.5-fold lower activity than human and mouse liver microsomes. High rifampicin hydrolase activity was detected only by recombinant human AADAC and human liver and jejunum microsomes. Taken together, the results of this study clarified the species differences in the tissue distribution and enzyme activities of AADAC and facilitate our understanding of species differences in drug hydrolysis.

A "moonlighting" dizinc aminopeptidase from Streptomyces griseus: mechanisms for peptide hydrolysis and the 4 x 10(10)-fold acceleration of the alternative phosphodiester hydrolysis

A unique "enzyme catalytic promiscuity" has recently been observed, wherein a phosphodiester and a phosphonate ester are hydrolyzed by a dinuclear aminopeptidase and its metal derivatives from Streptomyces griseus (SgAP) [Park, H. I., Ming, L.-J. (1999) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 2914-2916 and Ercan, A., Park, H. I., Ming, L.-J. (2000) Chem. Commun. 2501-2502]. Because tetrahedral phosphocenters often serve as transition-state inhibitors toward the hydrolysis of the peptide, phosphoester hydrolysis by peptidases is thus not expected to occur effectively and must take place through a unique mechanism. Owing to the very different structures and mechanistic requirements between phosphoesters and peptides during hydrolysis, the study of this effective phosphodiester hydrolysis by SgAP may provide further insight into the action of this enzyme that is otherwise not obtainable from regular peptide substrates. We present herein a detailed investigation of both peptide and phosphodiester hydrolyses catalyzed by SgAP. The latter exhibits a first-order rate enhancement of 4 x 10(10)-fold compared to the uncatalyzed reaction at pH 7.0 and 25 degrees C. The results suggest that peptide and phosphodiester hydrolyses by SgAP may share a common reaction mechanism to a certain extent. However, their differences in pH dependence, phosphate and fluoride inhibition patterns, and proton inventory reflect that they must follow different pathways. Mechanisms for the two hydrolyses are drawn on the basis of the results, which provide the foundation for further investigation of the catalytic promiscuity of this enzyme by means of physical and molecular biology methods. The catalytic versatility of SgAP suggests that this enzyme may serve as a unique "natural model system" for further investigation of dinuclear hydrolysis. A better understanding of enzyme catalytic promiscuity is also expected to shed light on the evolution and action of enzymes.

Involvement of Human Blood Arylesterases and Liver Microsomal Carboxylesterases in Nafamostat Hydrolysis

Metabolism of nafamostat, a clinically used serine protease inhibitor, was investigated with human blood and liver enzyme sources. All the enzyme sources examined (whole blood, erythrocytes, plasma and liver microsomes) showed nafamostat hydrolytic activity. V(max) and K(m) values for the nafamostat hydrolysis in erythrocytes were 278 nmol/min/mL blood fraction and 628 microM; those in plasma were 160 nmol/min/mL blood fraction and 8890 microM, respectively. Human liver microsomes exhibited a V(max) value of 26.9 nmol/min/mg protein and a K(m) value of 1790 microM. Hydrolytic activity of the erythrocytes and plasma was inhibited by 5, 5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), an arylesterase inhibitor, in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, little or no suppression of these activities was seen with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP), bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate (BNPP), BW284C51 and ethopropazine. The liver microsomal activity was markedly inhibited by PMSF, DFP and BNPP, indicating that carboxylesterase was involved in the nafamostat hydrolysis. Human carboxylesterase 2 expressed in COS-1 cells was capable of hydrolyzing nafamostat at 10 and 100 microM, whereas recombinant carboxylesterase 1 showed significant activity only at a higher substrate concentration (100 microM). The nafamostat hydrolysis in 18 human liver microsomes correlated with aspirin hydrolytic activity specific for carboxylesterase 2 (r=0.815, p<0.01) but not with imidapril hydrolysis catalyzed by carboxylesterase 1 (r=0.156, p=0.54). These results suggest that human arylesterases and carboxylesterase 2 may be predominantly responsible for the metabolism of nafamostat in the blood and liver, respectively.

Pranlukast: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Pranlukast (Onon, Azlaire), is an orally administered, selective, competitive antagonist of the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT) C(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4). It is indicated for the prophylactic treatment of chronic bronchial asthma in paediatric and adult patients. The efficacy of pranlukast 225mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma was demonstrated in double-blind, placebo- or azelastine-controlled studies of 4 or 8 weeks' duration. The drug at this dosage was superior to both comparators in improving mean attack scores and morning and/or evening peak expiratory flow rates, and decreasing the use of rescue bronchodilators (p < 0.05). In limited clinical studies, pranlukast 225mg twice daily appeared to be as effective as montelukast 10mg once daily and zafirlukast 40mg twice daily in adults with mild to moderate asthma. Tachyphylaxis was absent when the drug was administered for up to 4 years. In patients requiring high-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy, pranlukast 225 mg twice daily plus a halved dosage of inhaled corticosteroid was as effective as the original dosage of inhaled corticosteroid. Pranlukast was also effective in patients with mild to severe asthma in a clinical practice setting. In a double-blind trial, greater improvements in most outcome measures were observed with pranlukast than with oxatomide in children and adolescents with asthma. In clinical trials, pranlukast was well tolerated in adult and paediatric patients with asthma, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. Gastrointestinal events and hepatic function abnormalities were the most commonly reported adverse events. No clinically significant differences in adverse event profiles between pranlukast, zafirlukast or montelukast were shown in limited comparisons. Although Churg-Strauss syndrome has been noted in pranlukast recipients, a direct causal relationship is unlikely.

CONCLUSIONS

Pranlukast is a well tolerated and effective preventative treatment in adult and paediatric patients with persistent asthma of all severities. In some patients, pranlukast may be beneficial when added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids; it may also be a viable alternative to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dosages. The efficacy of pranlukast relative to placebo has been confirmed; its efficacy relative to other therapy awaits further investigation. Nonetheless, pranlukast is a useful therapeutic option (with as-required short-acting beta(2)-agonists), either as preventative monotherapy for the treatment of mild persistent asthma or in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids in the management of moderate or severe persistent asthma.