Gait Biomechanics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament–reconstructed Knees at Different Time Frames Postsurgery

Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on Gait Analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently available studies on the long-term functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have yielded conflicting results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of walking in the long term after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included a test group of 18 patients (3.4 years from the date of ACL reconstruction on average) and a control group of 20 healthy subjects. Their gaits were assessed using functional tests at voluntary walking and fast-walking speeds. The biomechanical assessments utilized included spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of walking, as well as surface electromyography (EMG) amplitudes of the main flexor-extensor muscles of the lower extremities.

RESULTS

Fast-walking speeds and the clearances of the operated-upon limbs in the patient group exceeded those in the control group. The gait cycle in the patient group was significantly longer when walking at a voluntary speed compared to the control group. In the patient group, most of the movements were symmetrical at both speeds, and the parameters did not differ from the control group. The only exception was the hip joint amplitude and the main amplitude of the knee joint flexion, which significantly and simultaneously increased when walking at a fast speed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the postoperative period, at voluntary speeds, the patient group was characterized by increased amplitudes in the hip and knee joints and higher EMG amplitudes, which almost disappeared at higher speeds.

Effect of Running Speed on Knee Biomechanics in Collegiate Athletes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) demonstrate altered surgical knee running kinematics and kinetics compared with the nonsurgical limb and healthy controls. The effect of running speed on biomechanics has not been formally assessed in athletes post-ACLR. The purpose of this study was to characterize how knee biomechanics change with running speed between 3.5-7 (EARLY) and 8-13 (LATE) months post-ACLR.

METHODS

Fifty-five Division I collegiate athletes post-ACLR completed running analyses (EARLY: n = 40, LATE: n = 41, both: n = 26) at 2.68, 2.95, 3.35, 3.80, and 4.47 m·s -1 . Linear mixed-effects models assessed the influence of limb, speed, time post-ACLR, and their interactions on knee kinematics and kinetics.

RESULTS

A significant limb-speed interaction was detected for peak knee flexion, knee flexion excursion, and rate of knee extensor moment ( P < 0.02), controlling for time. From 3.35 to 4.47 m·s -1 , knee flexion excursion decreased by -2.3° (95% confidence interval, -3.6 to -1.0) in the nonsurgical limb and -1.0° (95% confidence interval, -2.3 to -0.3) in the surgical limb. Peak vertical ground reaction force, peak knee extensor moment, and knee negative work increased similarly with speed for both limbs ( P < 0.002). A significant limb-time interaction was detected for all variables ( P < 0.001). Accounting for running speed, improvements in all surgical limb biomechanics were observed from EARLY to LATE ( P < 0.001), except for knee flexion at initial contact ( P = 0.12), but between-limb differences remained ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and nonsurgical knee biomechanics increase similarly with speed in collegiate athletes at EARLY and LATE, with the exception of peak knee flexion, knee flexion excursion, and rate of knee extensor moment. Surgical knee biomechanics improved from EARLY and LATE, but significant between-limb differences persisted.

Biomechanical Effects of Manipulating Preferred Cadence During Treadmill Walking in Patients With ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Abnormal gait is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) which may influence osteoarthritis risk in this population. Yet few gait retraining options currently exist in ACLR rehabilitation. Cueing cadence changes is a simple, low-cost method that can alter walking mechanics in healthy adults, but few studies have tested its effectiveness in an ACLR population. Here, we evaluated the acute effects of altering cadence on knee mechanics in patients 9 to 12 months post ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

Cueing larger steps will facilitate larger knee angles and moments, while cueing smaller steps would induce smaller knee angles and moments.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized cross-sectional design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with unilateral ACLR underwent gait assessments on a treadmill at preferred pace. Preferred walking gait was assessed first to obtain preferred cadence. Participants then completed trials while matching an audible beat set to 90% and 110% of preferred cadence in a randomized order. Three-dimensional sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics were evaluated bilaterally.

RESULTS

Compared with preferred cadence, cueing larger steps induced larger peak knee flexion moments (KFMs) and knee extension excursions bilaterally (P < 0.01), whereas cueing smaller steps only reduced knee flexion excursions (P < 0.01). Knee adduction moments remain unchanged across conditions and were similar between limbs (P > 0.05). Peak KFMs and excursions were smaller in the injured compared with uninjured limb (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Frontal plane gait outcomes were unchanged across conditions suggesting acute cadence manipulations result in mainly sagittal plane adaptations. Follow-up studies using a longitudinal cadence biofeedback paradigm may be warranted to elucidate the utility of this gait retraining strategy after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cueing changes in walking cadence can target sagittal plane knee loading and joint range of motion in ACLR participants. This strategy may offer high clinical translatability given it requires relatively minimal equipment (ie, free metronome app) outside of a treadmill.

Lower extremity joint contact force symmetry during walking and running, 2-7 years post-ACL reconstruction

Premature osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common among athletes. Reduced knee contact forces after ACLR likely contribute to the multifactorial etiology of the disease. Whether this reduction is accompanied by compensatory increases in joint contact forces (JCF) at adjacent or contralateral joints is unclear. It is also unclear if compensatory effects depend on the task demands. Thus, we compared hip, knee, and ankle JCF symmetry between individuals with reconstruction and a matched control group during walking and running. Thirty participants (19 females), 2-7 years post-unilateral ACLR (mean = 47.8 months), and 30 controls matched on sex, mass, and activity level were recruited. Limb symmetry indices of peak contact forces and force impulses were calculated for each joint during walking and running, and analyzed using two-factor (group, activity) analysis of variances. Lower ACLR group peak knee JCF (p = 0.009) and knee JCF impulse (p = 0.034) during walking and running were observed. An interaction of group and activity was observed for peak hip JCF, with ACLR participants demonstrating greater involved limb peak hip JCF during running (p = 0.012). Ankle JCF and ground reaction force symmetry indices were not different between groups or across tasks. Decreased knee and increased ipsilateral peak hip JCF during running suggests that proximal adaptations exist at 2-7 years after ACLR, particularly during activities with increased task demand. Clinical significance: Knee and hip JCF asymmetry at 2-7 years after ACLR may underscore a need for clinical strategies and follow-up assessments to identify and target such outcomes.

Strategies for knee stabilising and pivot-shift avoidance in a step-down and cross-over task observed sub-acutely after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Individuals with a recent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may demonstrate an altered movement strategy for protecting the knee and maintaining stability. Altered knee movement might lead to abnormal intra-articular load, potentially contributing to early knee osteoarthritis onset. A protective strategy may be particularly evident during active tasks that induce a pivot-shift manoeuvre, such as a step-down and cross-over task. In this study, we investigated whether knee joint mechanics and muscle activity differed between participants early (∼3 months) following reconstruction (n = 35) to uninjured controls (n = 35) during a step-down and cross-over task with a 45° change-of-direction.

METHODS

We used motion capture, force plates and surface electromyography to compare time-normalised curves of sagittal and transverse-plane knee mechanics and muscle activity during the cross-over phase between groups using functional t-tests. We also compared knee mechanics between sides within the injured group and compared discrete outcomes describing the cross-over phase between groups.

FINDINGS

Compared to controls, the injured participants had greater knee flexion angle and moment, lower internal rotation moment, more preparatory foot rotation of the pivoting leg, a smaller cross-over angle, and a longer cross-over phase for both the injured and uninjured sides. The injured leg also had greater biceps femoris and vastus medialis muscle activity compared to controls and different knee mechanics than the uninjured leg.

INTERPRETATION

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed a knee-stabilising and pivot-shift avoidance strategy for both legs early in rehabilitation. These results may reflect an altered motor representation and motivate considerations early in rehabilitation.

Spatiotemporal lower-limb asymmetries during stair descent in athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study evaluated motor control recovery at different times following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) by investigating lower-limb spatiotemporal symmetry during stair descent performances.

METHODS

We used a cross-sectional design to compare asymptomatic athletes (Controls, n = 18) with a group of people with ACLR (n = 49) divided into three time-from-ACLR subgroups (Early: <6 months, n = 17; Mid: 6-18 months, n = 16; Late: ≥18 months, n = 16). We evaluated: "temporal symmetry" during the stance subphases (single-support, first and second double-support) and "spatial symmetry" for hip-knee-ankle intra-joint angular displacements during the stance phase using a dissimilarity index applied on superimposed 3D phase plots.

RESULTS

We found significant between-group differences in temporal variables (p ≤ 0.001). Compared to Controls, both Early and Mid (p ≤ 0.05) showed asymmetry in the first double-support time (longer for their injured vs. non-injured leg), while Early generally also showed longer durations in all other phases, regardless of stepping leg. No statistically significant differences were found for spatial intra-joint symmetry between groups.

CONCLUSION

Temporal but not spatial asymmetry in stair descent is often present early after ACLR; it may remain for up to 18 months and may underlie subtle intra- and inter-joint compensations. Spatial asymmetry may need further exploration.

The nature of gait biomechanics changes with walking speed increase in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

BACKGROUND

This study on gait biomechanics is based on a functional test (FT) performed at free and fast walking speeds.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the pattern of changes in gait biomechanical parameters and the knee function in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or its reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included 51 patients (33 males, 18 females) with a confirmed recent or old history of ACL tear, before or after reconstruction (26 patients). Mocap data was obtained using an inertial system. All patients were divided into three groups: 41 patients with physiological response (compensation), 6 patients with signs of decompensation, and 4 non-assessable patients.

RESULTS

Increase in gait speed was associated with decrease in the walking cycle duration, stance and double support phases. In the compensation group, the physiological response of the knee was manifested in increased amplitudes. In the decompensation group, the amplitudes remained unchanged or decreased. In the compensation group, there were increases in the symmetrical muscle activity. The decompensation group was characterized by electromyography asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The observed universal physiological mechanism limiting the load on the damaged joint can be used for accurate assessment of the knee functional state in various periods of rehabilitation.

Joint and Limb Loading during Gait in Adults with ACL Reconstruction: Comparison between Single-Step and Cumulative Load Metrics

PURPOSE

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) generally exhibit limb underloading behaviors during walking, but most research focuses on per-step comparisons. Cumulative loading metrics offer unique insight into joint loading as magnitude, duration, and total steps are considered, but few studies have evaluated if cumulative loads are altered post-ACLR. Here, we evaluated if underloading behaviors are apparent in ACLR limbs when using cumulative load metrics and how load metrics change in response to walking speed modifications.

METHODS

Treadmill walking biomechanics were evaluated in 21 participants with ACLR at three speeds (self-selected (SS); 120% SS and 80% SS). Cumulative loads per step and per kilometer were calculated using knee flexion and adduction moment (KFM and KAM) and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) impulses. Traditional magnitude metrics for KFM, KAM, and GRF were also calculated.

RESULTS

The ACLR limb displayed smaller KFM and GRF in early and late stances, but larger KFM and GRF during midstance compared with the contralateral limb ( P < 0.01). Only GRF cumulative loads (per step and per kilometer) were reduced in the ACLR limb ( P < 0.01). In response to speed modifications, load magnitudes generally increased with speed. Conversely, cumulative load metrics (per step and per kilometer) decreased at faster speeds and increased at slow speeds ( P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ACLR underload their knee in the sagittal plane per step, but cumulatively over the course of many steps/distance, this underloading phenomenon was not apparent. Furthermore, cumulative load increased at slower speeds, opposite to what is identified with traditional single-step metrics. Assessing cumulative load metrics may offer additional insight into how load outcomes may be impacted in injured populations or in response to gait modifications.

Walking speed differentially affects lower extremity biomechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to uninjured controls

BACKGROUND

Walking biomechanics are commonly affected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and differ compared to uninjured controls. Manipulating task difficulty has been shown to affect the magnitude of walking impairments in those early after knee surgery but it is unclear if patients in later phases post-op are similarly affected by differing task demands. Here, we evaluated the effects of manipulating walking speed on between-limb differences in ground reaction force and knee biomechanics in those with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

We recruited 28 individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 20 uninjured control participants to undergo walking assessments at three speeds (self-selected, 120%, and 80% self-selected speed). Main outcomes included sagittal plane knee moments, angles, excursions, and ground reaction forces (vertical and anterior-posterior).

FINDINGS

We observed walking speed differentially impacted force and knee-outcomes in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Between-limb differences increased at fast and decreased at slow speeds in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction while uninjured participants maintained between-limb differences regardless of speed (partial η2 = 0.13-0.33, p < 0.05). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients underloaded the surgical limb relative to both the contralateral, and uninjured controls in GRFs and sagittal plane knee moments (partial η2 range = 0.13-0.25, p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Overall, our findings highlight the persistence of walking impairments in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction despite completing formal rehabilitation. Further research should consider determining if those displaying larger changes in gait asymmetries in response to fast walking also exhibit poorer strength and/or joint health outcomes.

Immediate Effects of Walking With a Knee Brace After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Structural Approach

CONTEXT

Individuals who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at higher risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Altered joint tissue loading caused by aberrant gait biomechanics leads to deleterious changes in joint health linked to the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Knee braces have been used to modify joint tissue loading in individuals with joint injury, yet the effects of walking with a brace after ACLR on biomechanical, biochemical, and structural cartilage outcomes are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare biomechanical, biochemical, and structural outcomes between braced and nonbraced walking in individuals with ACLR.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 34 individuals with unilateral ACLR (18 females, 16 males; time since ACLR = 50.1 ± 36.8 months).

INTERVENTION(S)

Gait biomechanics were assessed during braced and unbraced conditions on separate days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Vertical ground reaction force, knee-flexion angle, and internal knee-extension moment waveforms were evaluated throughout the stance phase and compared between conditions. Percentage changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (%ΔCOMP) and femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (%ΔCSA) measured via ultrasound were calculated after a 3000-step walking protocol.

RESULTS

Braced walking increased the knee-flexion angle (largest difference = 3.56°; Cohen d effect size = 1.72) and knee-extension moment (largest difference = -0.48% body weight × height; Cohen d effect size = -1.14) compared with nonbraced walking but did not influence vertical ground reaction force. Whereas no difference (P = .20) in %ΔCOMP existed between the braced and nonbraced conditions in the entire cohort (n = 30 with complete blood data), a larger increase (P = .04) in %ΔCOMP was seen during nonbraced than braced walking in individuals who demonstrated increased COMP during nonbraced walking. No difference (P = .86) in %ΔCSA was present between the braced and nonbraced conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Braced walking may improve sagittal-plane gait biomechanics and %ΔCOMP in a subset of individuals who demonstrate a typical increased COMP response to load (ie, increase in COMP) after nonbraced walking.

Multi-planar instability, laxity and reduced knee flexion during the support phase of walking are determinants of return to sports

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, some patients are not recommended to return to high-level physical activity because they fail to pass return-to-sports tests. The kinematic difference between these patients and those who pass the return-to-sports tests is unclear.

Methods: Eighty-two patients who received anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for unilateral ACL injury underwent return-to-sport tests during a hospital visit at a minimum of 9 months (9–11 months) of follow-up. Fifteen patients who passed the return-to-sports tests (RTS group) and fifteen patients who did not (NRTS group) were randomly selected to perform a treadmill walk under dual-fluoroscopic imaging system surveillance for a 6 degrees of freedom kinematic evaluation.

Results: Of the 82 patients, 53 passed the return-to-sports tests 9 months after surgery, with a return-to-sports rate of 64.6%. In the stance phase, the NRTS group had a larger anterior tibial translation (1.00 ± 0.03 mm vs. 0.76 ± 0.03 mm, p = 0.001), a larger lateral tibial movement (1.61 ± 0.05 mm vs. 0.77 ± 0.05 mm, p < 0.001), a larger distal tibial displacement (−3.09 ± 0.05 mm vs. −2.69 ± 0.05 mm, p < 0.001), a smaller knee flexion angle (6.72 ± 0.07° vs. 8.34 ± 0.07°, p < 0.001), a larger varus angle (−0.40 ± 0.03°VS. -0.01 ± 0.03°, p < 0.001) and a larger external rotation angle (1.80 ± 0.05° vs. 1.77 ± 0.05°, p < 0.001) than the RTS group. The maximum anterior tibial translation of the NRTS group is also larger than that of the RTS group (3.64 ± 0.42 mm vs. 3.03 ± 0.59 mm, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Compared with patients passing RTS tests, those who fail to pass show significant anterior, lateral, and rotational instability; knee laxity; and reduced flexion angle of the knee in the support phase during walking, which may be the possible factors hindering a return to sports.

Quadriceps Muscle Action and Association With Knee Joint Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Insufficient quadriceps force production and altered knee joint biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may contribute to a heightened risk of osteoarthritis. Quadriceps muscle lengthening dynamics affect force production and knee joint loading; however, no study to our knowledge has quantified in vivo quadriceps dynamics during walking in individuals with ACLR or examined correlations with joint biomechanics. Our purpose was to quantify bilateral vastus lateralis (VL) fascicle length change and the association thereof with gait biomechanics during weight acceptance in individuals with ACLR. The authors hypothesized that ACLR limbs would exhibit more fascicle lengthening than contralateral limbs. The authors also hypothesized that ACLR limbs would exhibit positive correlations between VL fascicle lengthening and knee joint biomechanics during weight acceptance in walking. The authors quantified VL contractile dynamics via cine B-mode ultrasound imaging in 18 individuals with ACLR walking on an instrumented treadmill. In partial support of our hypothesis, ACLR limb VL fascicles activated without length change on average during weight acceptance while fascicle length on the contralateral limb decreased on average. The authors found a positive association between fascicle lengthening and increase in knee extensor moments in both limbs. Our results suggest that examining quadriceps muscle dynamics may elucidate underlying mechanisms relevant to osteoarthritis.

Atypical Lower Limb Mechanics During Weight Acceptance of Stair Descent at Different Time Frames After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture may result in poor sensorimotor knee control and, consequentially, adapted movement strategies to help maintain knee stability. Whether patients display atypical lower limb mechanics during weight acceptance of stair descent at different time frames after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unknown.

PURPOSE

To compare the presence of atypical lower limb mechanics during the weight acceptance phase of stair descent among athletes at early, middle, and late time frames after unilateral ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 49 athletes with ACLR were classified into 3 groups according to time after ACLR-early (<6 months; n = 17), middle (6-18 months; n = 16), and late (>18 months; n = 16)-and compared with asymptomatic athletes (control; n = 18). Sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles; angular velocities; moments; and powers were compared between the ACLR groups' injured and noninjured legs and the control group as well as between legs within groups using functional data analysis methods.

RESULTS

All 3 ACLR groups showed greater knee flexion angles and moments than the control group for injured and noninjured legs. For the other outcomes, the early group had, compared with the control group, less hip power absorption, more knee power absorption, lower ankle plantarflexion angle, lower ankle dorsiflexion moment, and less ankle power absorption for the injured leg and more knee power absorption and higher vertical ground reaction force for the noninjured leg. In addition, the late group showed differences from the control group for the injured leg revealing more knee power absorption and lower ankle plantarflexion angle. Only the early group took a longer time than the control group to complete weight acceptance and demonstrated asymmetry for multiple outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Athletes with different time frames after ACLR revealed atypically large knee angles and moments during weight acceptance of stair descent for both the injured and the noninjured legs. These findings may express a chronically adapted strategy to increase knee control. In contrast, atypical hip and ankle mechanics seem restricted to an early time frame after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Rehabilitation after ACLR should include early training in controlling weight acceptance. Including a control group is essential when evaluating movement patterns after ACLR because both legs may be affected.

Aberrant gait biomechanics in individuals with ACL reconstruction are magnified during treadmill walking

Aberrant gait biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) likely contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development. Gait biomechanics are typically assessed overground, but the use of instrumented/force-measuring treadmills is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics overground and on an instrumented treadmill in individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. Twenty-four individuals with ACLR and 24 healthy controls completed overground and gait biomechanics assessments. Biomechanical outcomes included peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), internal knee extension (KEM) and abduction (KAM) moments, and knee flexion (KFA) and adduction angles; KFA at heel strike; knee flexion displacement; and inter-limb symmetry for each outcome. Peak KEM (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.016, -0.007 xBW*Ht]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.09. -0.03 xBW]) were significantly less symmetrical in the ACLR group compared to the control group on the treadmill but not overground. Additionally, peak KEM was smaller in the ACLR limb compared to the contralateral limb both overground (P = 0.005, 95%CI [-0.010, -0.001 xBW*Ht]) and on the treadmill (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.015, -0.007 xBW*Ht]), but this difference was 1.8x larger on the treadmill compared to overground. Peak KFA (P = 0.001, 95%CI [-4.2, -1.2°]) and vGRF (P < 0.001, 95%CI [-0.07, -0.03 xBW]) were smaller in the ACLR limb on the treadmill but not overground. These findings suggest aberrant gait biomechanics are exacerbated during treadmill walking post-ACLR and that evaluating kinematics and kinetics on instrumented treadmills may be valuable for assessing risk factors of PTOA development.

Comparison of Lower Extremity Kinematics during the Overhead Deep Squat by Functional Movement Screen Score

It is unclear if the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scoring criteria identify kinematics that have been associated with lower extremity injury risk. The purpose was to compare lower extremity kinematics of the overhead deep squat (OHDS) during the FMS between individuals who were grouped on FMS scoring. Forty-five adults who were free of injury and without knowledge of the FMS or its scoring criteria (males = 19, females = 26; height = 1.68 0.08 m; mass = 70.7 7 13.0 kg). Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during an OHDS were measured using a motion capture system. One-way MANOVA was used to compare kinematic outcomes (peak hip flexion angle, hip adduction angle, knee flexion angle, knee abduction angle, knee internal rotation angle, and ankle dorsiflexion angle) between FMS groups. Those who scored a 3 had greater peak hip flexion angle (F_2,42 = 8.75; p = 0.001), knee flexion angle (F_2,42 = 13.53; p = 0.001), knee internal rotation angle (F_2,42 = 12.91; p = 0.001), and dorsiflexion angle (F_2,42 = 9.00; p = 0.001) compared to those who scored a 2 or a 1. However, no differences were found in any outcome between those who scored a 2 and those who scored a 1, or in frontal plane hip or knee kinematics. FMS scoring for the OHDS identified differences in squat depth, which was characterized by larger peak hip, knee, and dorsi- flexion angles in those who scored a 3 compared with those who scored 2 or 1. However, no differences were found between those who scored a 2 or 1, and caution is recommended when interpreting these scores. Despite a different FMS score, few differences were observed in frontal or transverse plane hip and knee kinematics, and other tasks may be needed to assess frontal plane kinematics.

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

PURPOSE

Our primary objectives were to (1) describe current approaches for kinetic measurements in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) suggest considerations for methodological reporting. Secondarily, we explored the relationship between kinetic measurement system findings and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

We followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley's 6-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2020. Original research papers reporting parameters measured by kinetic measurement systems in individuals at least 6-months post primary ACLR were included.

RESULTS

In 158 included studies, 7 kinetic measurement systems (force plates, balance platforms, pressure mats, force-measuring treadmills, Wii balance boards, contact mats connected to jump systems, and single-sensor insoles) were identified 4 main movement categories (landing/jumping, standing balance, gait, and other functional tasks). Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the methods used and outcomes assessed; this review highlighted common methodological reporting gaps for essential items related to movement tasks, kinetic system features, justification and operationalization of selected outcome parameters, participant preparation, and testing protocol details. Accordingly, we suggest considerations for methodological reporting in future research. Only 6 studies included PROMs with inconsistency in the reported parameters and/or PROMs.

CONCLUSION

Clear and accurate reporting is vital to facilitate cross-study comparisons and improve the clinical application of kinetic measurement systems after ACLR. Based on the current evidence, we suggest methodological considerations to guide reporting in future research. Future studies are needed to examine potential correlations between kinetic parameters and PROMs.

Between-Limb Differences in Patellofemoral Joint Forces During Running at 12 to 24 Months After Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis may occur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The mechanisms underpinning the development of PFJ osteoarthritis are not known but may relate to altered PFJ loading. Few studies have assessed PFJ loads during high-impact tasks, such as running, beyond the acute rehabilitation phase (ie, >12 months) after ACLR.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to compare between-limb joint angles, joint moments, and PFJ contact force during running in individuals at 12 to 24 months after unilateral ACLR. We hypothesized that peak knee flexion angle, knee extension moment, and PFJ contact force during stance would be lower in the ACLR limb compared with the uninjured limb.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 55 participants (mean ± SD age, 28 ± 7 years), 12 to 24 months after ACLR, ran at a self-selected speed (2.9 ± 0.3 m/s). Measured kinematics and ground-reaction forces were input into musculoskeletal models to calculate joint moments and muscle forces. These values were subsequently input into a PFJ model to calculate contact force peak and impulse. Outcome measures were compared between the ACLR and uninjured limbs.

RESULTS

In the ACLR limb, compared with the uninjured limb, the PFJ contact force displayed a lower peak (ACLR, 6.1 ± 1.3 body weight [BW]; uninjured, 6.7 ± 1.4 BW; P < .001) and impulse (ACLR, 0.72 ± 0.17 BW*seconds [BWs]; uninjured, 0.81 ± 0.17 BWs; P < .001). At the time of the peak PFJ contact force, the knee extension moment was lower in the ACLR limb (ACLR, 14.0 ± 2.4 %BW*height [%BW*HT]; uninjured, 15.5 ± 2.5 %BW*HT; P < .001). The opposite was true for the ankle plantarflexion moment (ACLR, 12.1 ± 2.6 %BW*HT; uninjured, 11.5 ± 2.7 %BW*HT; P = .019) and the hip extension moment (ACLR, 2.3 ± 2.5 %BW*HT; uninjured, 1.6 ± 2.3 %BW*HT; P = .013). The foot-ground center of pressure was located more anteriorly with respect to the ankle joint center (ACLR, 5.8 ± 0.9 %height [%HT]; uninjured, 5.4 ± 1.0 %HT; P = .001). No differences were found for the sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles.

CONCLUSION

The ACLR limb experienced lower peak PFJ loads during running, explained by a small anterior shift in the foot-ground center of pressure during stance that offloaded the torque demand away from the ACLR knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lower net PFJ loading during running in the ACLR limb more than 12 months after ACLR suggests that underloading might play a role in the onset of PFJ osteoarthritis after ACLR.

Gait Analysis and Knee Kinematics in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Before and After Reconstruction

The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and biomechanical symptoms in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture before and after ACL reconstruction. The study enrolled 20 patients and 20 healthy subjects as controls. Walking biomechanics was assessed at three time points: before surgery and three months and a year or more after surgical reconstruction. Impact loads on both sides differed significantly from the respective values before surgery (p<0.05). Walking cycle duration decreased with time after surgery. On both sides (affected and unaffected), hip movement amplitudes were significantly smaller than in control (p<0.05). They remained so in the follow-up periods after the reconstruction. Before ACL reconstruction, the amplitude of the main flexion of the knee was significantly reduced both on the affected and unaffected sides. The amplitude gradually increased after the reconstruction, and a year post-surgery, it reached, on the operated side, the same values as in the control group. Complete functional recovery of the knee joint was not achieved within a year after the ACL surgical reconstruction. The remaining changes, however, were not clinically pronounced and could only be detected by instrumental gait analysis. The compensatory processes developed bilaterally, in both the hip and knee joints.