Effects of Additive Tolvaptan vs. Increased Furosemide on Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Impairment - Results From the K-STAR Study

Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.

METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.

CONCLUSION

While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.

Clinical efficacy of tolvaptan in acute decompensated heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation: a sub-analysis from the LOHAS registry

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are risk factors of hemodynamic instability in heart failure (HF) management due to low cardiac output, respectively. Therefore, the treatment of HF due to severe AS complicated with AF is anticipated to be difficult. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor inhibitor, is effective in controlling acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with hemodynamic stability. However, its clinical efficacy against ADHF caused by AS with AF remains to be determined.

METHODS

Clinical information (from September 2014 to December 2017) of 59 patients diagnosed with ADHF due to severe AS (20 patients with AF; 39 patients with sinus rhythm [SR]) was obtained from the LOHAS registry. The registry collected data from seven hospitals and assessed the short-term effects of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for ADHF with severe AS. We attempted to identify clinical differences from baseline up to 4 days, comparing patients with AF (AF group) versus those with SR (SR group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups in age (83.7 ± 4.5 vs. 85.8 ± 6.9 years, respectively; p = 0.11) and aortic valve area (0.60 [0.46-0.73] vs. 0.56 [0.37-0.70] cm2, respectively; p = 0.50). However, left atrial volume was larger (104 [85-126] vs. 87 [64-103] mL, respectively; p < 0.01), whereas stroke volume was lower (51.6 ± 14.8 vs. 59.0 ± 18.7 mL, respectively; p = 0.08) in the AF group versus the SR group. Body weight decreased daily from baseline up to day 4 in both groups (from 55.4 to 53.2 kg [p < 0.01] and from 53.5 to 51.0 kg [p < 0.01], respectively) without change in heart rate. Notably, the systolic blood pressure decreased slightly in the AF group after 2 days of treatment with tolvaptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment with tolvaptan improved HF in patients hospitalized for severe AS, regardless of the presence of AF or SR. After achieving sufficient diuresis, a slight decrease in blood pressure was observed in the AF group, suggesting an appropriate timeframe for safe and effective use of tolvaptan.

The role of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Several conflicting reviews have concluded that the use of loop diuretics is associated with poorer clinical and safety outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an adjunct to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library until 24 May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of tolvaptan with conventional therapy and placebo in patients with AHF. The quality assessment of the included trials was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine the dosage effect of tolvaptan.

Result

A total of 17 studies with 18 reports, involving 10,039 patients, were selected. The tolvaptan add-on therapy significantly alleviated dyspnea [24 h: RR 1.16 (1.04, 1.29), 48 h: RR 1.18 (1.04, 1.33)], reduced body weight within 48 h [Asian group, MD -0.93 (-1.48, -0.38); non-Asian group, MD -2.76 (-2.88, -2.65)], reduced edema [RR 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)], increased serum sodium [non-Asian group, MD 3.40 (3.02, 3.78)], and resulted in a change in serum creatinine [MD -0.10 (-0.18, -0.01)]. No significant differences were observed in mortality and rehospitalization. The NMA suggested that an intermediate dosage (15 mg/day) might offer the best efficacy in reducing dyspnea within 24 h, reducing edema, increasing serum sodium, and lowering the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that tolvaptan contributed to the short-term alleviation of congestive symptoms, elevated sodium levels, and a lower incidence of WRF. However, no significant benefits were observed in long-term symptoms, rehospitalization rates, and mortality. An intermediate dosage of tolvaptan might be considered the optimal choice for various clinical outcomes.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023420288).

How should we treat acute kidney injury caused by renal congestion?

Decreased kidney function is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, and heart failure (HF) is a wellknown risk factor for renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with HF often is attributed to prerenal factors, such as renal hypoperfusion and ischemia as a result of decreased cardiac output. Another such factor is reduction of absolute or relative circulating blood volume, with the decrease in renal blood flow leading to renal hypoxia followed by a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate. However, renal congestion is increasingly being recognized as a potential cause of AKI in patients with HF. Increased central venous pressure and renal venous pressure lead to increased renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure and a reduction of the glomerular filtration rate. Both decreased kidney function and renal congestion have been shown to be important prognostic factors of HF, and adequate control of congestion is important for improving kidney function. Loop and thiazide diuretics are recommended as standard therapies to reduce volume overload. However, these agents are associated with worsening renal function even though they are effective for improving congestive symptoms. There is growing interest in tolvaptan, which can improve renal congestion by increasing excretion of free water and decreasing the required dose of loop diuretic, thereby improving kidney function. This review summarizes renal hemodynamics, the pathogenesis of AKI due to renal ischemia and renal congestion, and diagnosis and treatment options for renal congestion.

Tolvaptan's Association with Low Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Furosemide, a loop diuretic, is often empirically used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) initially. Conversely, decongestion using tolvaptan, an aquaretic, is thought to maintain renal function compared to furosemide. However, it has not been investigated in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to investigate AKI incidence using tolvaptan add-on treatment, compared to increased furosemide treatment for patients with ADHF complicated by advanced CKD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) who developed ADHF under outpatient furosemide treatment. The exposure was set to tolvaptan add-on treatment, and the control was set to increased furosemide treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients enrolled, 79 were in the tolvaptan group and 84 in the furosemide group. The mean age was 71.6 years, the percentage of males was 63.8%, the mean eGFR was 15.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, and patients with CKD stage G5 were 61.9%. AKI incidence was 17.7% in the tolvaptan group and 42.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.13-0.86], p = 0.023 in multivariate logistic regression analysis). Persistent AKI incidence was 11.8% in the tolvaptan group and 32.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.10-1.06], p = 0.066 in the multinomial logit analysis).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that tolvaptan may be better than furosemide in patients with ADHF experiencing complicated advanced CKD.

Impact of the time-to-target rate of urine volume concept on the outcome of acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Early decongestion with diuretics could improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of the time-to-target rate of urine volume (T2TUV) concept on the outcome of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 1670 patients with ADHF who received diuretics within 24 h of admission. T2TUV was defined as the time from admission to the rate of urine volume of 100 ml/h. The primary outcomes were in-hospital death, mortality, and re-hospitalization for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 789 patients met the inclusion criteria (T2TUV on day 1, n = 248; day 2-3, n = 172; no target rate UV, n = 369). In-hospital mortality in the day 1 group was significantly lower (2.7% vs. 5.9% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001) than that of other groups. The mortality and re-hospitalization for 1 year in the day 1 group was significantly lower (event-free rate: 67.7% vs. 54.1% vs. 56.9%; log-lank p = 0.004) than that of other groups. In multivariate analysis, predictors of T2TUV at day 1 were age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.007), previous hospitalized heart failure (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: [1.03-2.12], p = 0.03), N-terminal-pro B type natriuretic peptide per 1000 pg/ml (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.007), carperitide (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-0.99, p = 0.05), and early administration of tolvaptan (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.42-0.85, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

T2TUV of less than day 1 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and decreased mortality and re-hospitalization at 1 year.

Predictors of Poor Very Early Diuretic Response and Effectiveness of Early Tolvaptan in Symptomatic Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Diuretic response (DR) in patients with symptomatic acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has an impact on prognosis. This study aimed to identify predictive factors influencing acute 6 h poor DR and to assess DR after early administration of tolvaptan (TLV).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 1670 patients who were admitted for ADHF and received intravenous furosemide within 1 h of presentation in clinical scenario 1 or 2 defined based on initial systolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg with severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class III or IV (n = 830). The score for the poor DR factors in the very acute phase was calculated in patients treated with furosemide-only diuretics (n = 439). The DR to TLV administration was also assessed in patients who received an additional dose of TLV within 6 h (n = 391).

RESULTS

The time since discharge from the hospital for a previous heart failure < 3 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-5.83; p = 0.006), loop diuretics at admission (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.74-5.36; p < 0.0001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.58-5.74; p = 0.0007) were independent determinants of poor DR. The frequency of poor DR according to the risk stratification group was low risk (no risk factor), 18.9%; middle risk (one risk factor), 33.1%; and high risk (two to three risk factors), 58.0% (p < 0.0001). All risk groups demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of poor DR with early TLV administration: 10.7% in the early TLV group versus 18.9% in the loop diuretics group (p = 0.09) of the low-risk group; 18.4% versus 33.1% (p = 0.01) in the middle-risk group, and 20.2% versus 58.0% (p < 0.0001) in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Early administration of TLV in patients with predicted poor DR contributed to a significant diuretic effect and suppression of worsening renal function.

Impact of urine cyclic AMP relative to plasma arginine vasopressin on response to tolvaptan in patients with chronic kidney disease and heart failure

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of tolvaptan in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with heart failure remains uncertain. The level of urine cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) relative to plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) indicates the residual function of the collecting ducts in response to AVP stimulation and might be a key to predicting response of tolvaptan.

METHODS

CKD patients who were hospitalized to treat their congestive heart failure refractory to conventional loop diuretics were considered to receive tolvaptan and included in this prospective study. The impact of urine cyclic AMP/plasma AVP ratio for prediction of response to tolvaptan, which was defined as any increase in urine volume at day 7 from day 0, was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (median 75 years old, 24 men, and median estimated glomerular filtration rate 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) were included. As compared to baseline, urine volume increased at day 7 in 17 responders, whereas urine volume decreased at day 7 in 13 non-responders. Baseline urine cyclic AMP/plasma AVP ratio distributed between 0.25 and 4.01 with median 1.90. The urine cyclic AMP/plasma AVP ratio was a significant predictor of response to tolvaptan, which was adjusted for 6 potential confounders with a cutoff of 1.24.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline urine cyclic AMP/plasma AVP ratio is an independent predictor of response to tolvaptan in advanced CKD patients with heart failure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000022422.

Relationship between early drop in systolic blood pressure, worsening renal function, and in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure: a retrospective, observational study

This study aimed to determine the optimal cut-off value of the early drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) for worsening renal function (WRF) in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) and analyze predictors of WRF and the early drop in SBP at that threshold. We retrospectively enrolled 396 patients with acute decompensated HF. The early drop in SBP was defined as the difference between baseline and SBP measured 24 h after hospitalization. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal cut-off value of the early drop in SBP for WRF and evaluated the effect of the early drop in SBP on in-hospital mortality by multivariate logistic regression analyses. The mean age of the patients was 73.4 ± 14.7 years, and 61.2% were men. A 14.0% drop in SBP was identified as the optimal cut-off value for WRF from the ROC curve analysis. An early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0% was associated with WRF in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 7.84; 95% confidence interval 4.06-15.14; P < 0.0001). The dose of intravenous furosemide within 24 h of admission was one of the predictors of the early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0%, while no early drop in SBP was a predictor of in-hospital mortality in multivariate logistic regression models. In conclusion, the optimal cut-off value for WRF in patients with HF was a 14.0% drop in SBP within 24 h of admission. The early drop in SBP ≥ 14.0% was one of the predictors of WRF in patients with HF. However, no early drop in SBP was associated with in-hospital mortality. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN000035989).

Diuretic resistance in patients with kidney disease: Challenges and opportunities

Edema caused by kidney disease is called renal edema. Edema is a common symptom of many human kidney diseases. Patients with renal edema often need to take diuretics.However, After taking diuretics, patients with kidney diseases are prone to kidney congestion, decreased renal perfusion, decreased diuretics secreted by renal tubules, neuroendocrine system abnormalities, abnormal ion transporter transport, drug interaction, electrolyte disorder, and hypoproteinemia, which lead to ineffective or weakened diuretic use and increase readmission rate and mortality. The main causes and coping strategies of diuretic resistance in patients with kidney diseases were described in detail in this report. The common causes of DR included poor diet (electrolyte disturbance and hypoproteinemia due to patients' failure to limit diet according to correct sodium, chlorine, potassium, and protein level) and poor drug compliance (the patient did not take adequate doses of diuretics. true resistance occurs only if the patient takes adequate doses of diuretics, but they are not effective), changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, electrolyte disorders, changes in renal adaptation, functional nephron reduction, and decreased renal blood flow. Common treatment measures include increasing in the diuretic dose and/or frequency, sequential nephron blockade,using new diuretics, ultrafiltration treatment, etc. In clinical work, measures should be taken to prevent or delay the occurrence and development of DR in patients with kidney diseases according to the actual situation of patients and the mechanism of various causes. Currently, there are many studies on DR in patients with heart diseases. Although the phenomenon of DR in patients with kidney diseases is common, there is a relatively little overview of the mechanism and treatment strategy of DR in patients with kidney diseases. Therefore, this paper hopes to show the information on DR in patients with kidney diseases to clinicians and researchers and broaden the research direction and ideas to a certain extent.

SGLT2 inhibitor and loop diuretic induce different vasopressin and fluid homeostatic responses in nondiabetic rats

Loop diuretics are commonly used diuretics in the treatment of fluid retention but induce hypovolemia-related renal dysfunction. Na+-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors induce osmotic diuresis, but body fluid volume is maintained by stimulating vasopressin-induced fluid intake and collecting duct water reabsorption as previously reported in diabetic rats. We aimed to test the hypothesis that unlike SGLT2 inhibitors, loop diuretics lack activation of similar fluid homeostatic mechanisms. Nondiabetic male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated daily by oral gavage with vehicle, the SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin (5 mg/kg), or the loop diuretic furosemide (50 mg/kg) and monitored in metabolic cages for 2 or 7 days. Ipragliflozin and furosemide similarly increased urine volume on day 2. This was associated with increased serum Na+ concentration, urine vasopressin excretion, fluid intake, and solute-free water reabsorption in response to ipragliflozin but not to furosemide. Ipragliflozin maintained fluid balance (fluid intake - urine volume) on day 2 and total body water measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy and serum creatinine on day 7. In comparison, furosemide decreased fluid balance on day 2 and decreased total body water and increased serum creatinine on day 7. Furosemide, but not ipragliflozin, increased plasma renin activity, and systolic blood pressure was similar among the groups. In conclusion, the osmotic diuresis of the SGLT2 inhibitor increased serum Na+ concentration and the vasopressin-related stimulation of fluid intake and renal water retention maintained fluid balance, whereas the loop diuretic did not engage the compensatory vasopressin system. The data suggest differences in vasopressin and fluid homeostatic responses between SGLT2 inhibitors and loop diuretics.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In nondiabetic rats, the Na+-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor ipragliflozin increased vasopressin-related stimulation of fluid intake and free water reabsorption and maintained fluid balance and serum creatinine, whereas the loop diuretic furosemide reduced vasopressin and induced a negative fluid balance followed by a subsequent increase in serum creatinine. This study suggests that differences in vasopressin secretion in response to a SGLT2 inhibitor or loop diuretic may contribute to differences in body fluid status and subsequent renal function.

Effect of Tolvaptan in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage G5, and Impact of Concomitant Use of Thiazide Diuretics: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The diuretic effect of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, in patients with severe renal dysfunction remains poorly characterized. Thiazide diuretics reduce urinary volume (UV) in patients with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, which lacks V2 receptor function.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study investigated the acute urinary effects of tolvaptan in patients with stage G5 chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure (CHF), and the impact of thiazide diuretics on the urinary effects of tolvaptan.

METHODS

UVs 24 h before and after tolvaptan administration and 30-day dialysis initiation rate were compared between patients with and without thiazide diuretic administration.

RESULTS

Thiazide diuretics were used in 26 of the 106 recruited patients (age 73.4 ± 13.0 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.07 ± 3.13 mL/min/1.73 m²). The pre- and post-tolvaptan 24-h UVs were significantly higher in patients not administered thiazide diuretics (1043.4 ± 645.6 vs. 1422.2 ± 774.0 mL/day; p < 0.001) than in those administered thiazide diuretics (1177.3 ± 686.5 vs. 1173.1 ± 629.1 mL/day; p = 0.93). In a multivariate regression model, thiazide diuretic use was significantly associated with decreased 24-h UV (β coefficient - 486.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 674.5 to - 298.8); increased urine osmolality (β coefficient 37.7, 95% CI 17.1-58.4); increased body weight (β coefficient 0.62, 95% CI 0.31-0.92); and increased 30-day dialysis initiation rate (odds ratio 3.40, 95% CI 1.18-9.82) after tolvaptan administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan exhibited significant diuretic effects in patients with CHF, including those with severe renal dysfunction, which were diminished with concomitant thiazide diuretic use.

Efficacy of Nondiuretic Pharmacotherapy for Improving the Treatment of Congestion in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Diuretic therapy is the mainstay during episodes of acute heart failure (AHF). Diuretic resistance is often encountered and poses a substantial challenge for clinicians. There is a lack of evidence on the optimal strategies to tackle this problem. This review aimed to compare the outcomes associated with congestion management based on a strategy of pharmacological nondiuretic-based regimens. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were systematically searched for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant pharmacological treatments used during hospitalisation episodes of AHF patients. Congestion relief constitutes the main target in AHF; hence, only studies with efficacy indicators related to decongestion enhancement were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included RCTs. Twenty-three studies were included; dyspnea relief constituted the critical efficacy endpoint in most included studies. However, substantial variations in dyspnea measurement were found. Tolvaptan and serelaxin were found to be promising options that might improve decongestion in AHF patients. However, further high-quality RCTs using a standardised approach to diuretic management, including dosing and monitoring strategies, are crucial to provide new insights and recommendations for managing heart failure in acute settings.

Efficacy of tolvaptan on advanced chronic kidney disease with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Tolvaptan (TLV) is reported to improve diuretic effects in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) when furosemide (FUR) is not sufficiently effective. However, it is not clear whether TLV addition is effective for advanced CKD patients with heart failure.

Methods

An open-label, parallel-group randomized trial was performed. The subjects were 33 patients with CKD stage G3–G5 who had fluid overload despite taking 20–100 mg/day FUR. They were divided into two groups: a group administered 15 mg/day TLV plus their original FUR dose for 7 days (TLV group), and a group administered 120–200 mg/day FUR (i.e., 100 mg/day over their previous dose) for 7 days (FUR group).

Results

The mean change in urine volume was significantly higher in the TLV group compared to the FUR group (637 ml vs 119 ml; p < 0.05). The difference was greater when the urine osmolality before treatment was high. Serum creatinine was increased only in the FUR group. The incidence of worsening renal function (WRF) was significantly lower in the TLV group (18.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.05). Serum sodium decreased significantly in the FUR group, but did not change in the TLV group.

Conclusions

In patients with advanced CKD with fluid overload, the addition of TLV achieved a significantly higher urine volume with less adverse effects on renal function compared with increasing the dose of FUR. The efficacy and safety of TLV were higher in patients who had higher urine osmolality and lower serum sodium before treatment.

Clinical trial registration

UMIN000014763.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of OPC-61815, a Prodrug of Tolvaptan for Intravenous Administration, in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure - A Phase II, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan is an orally administered aquaretic drug indicated for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) to remove excess fluid. OPC-61815, a prodrug of tolvaptan with improved water solubility, is considered suitable for intravenous (IV) administration. This Phase II study investigated the OPC-61815 dose that would result in an exposure equivalent to tolvaptan 15 mg.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized study in Japanese patients aged 20-85 years with CHF and volume overload despite treatment with diuretics other than vasopressin antagonists. Patients received IV OPC-61815 2 mg (n=13), 4 mg (n=12), 8 mg (n=12), 16 mg (n=11), or oral tolvaptan 15 mg (n=12). The primary endpoint was tolvaptan exposure on treatment Day 1; efficacy and safety were also assessed. Tolvaptan exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner following a single IV administration of OPC-61815; the exposure following an IV dose of OPC-61815 16 mg was similar to that of a tolvaptan 15-mg tablet, with no marked differences in safety or tolerability. OPC-61815 increased urine volume from baseline, resulting in decreased body weight and improved lower limb edema. No notable safety concerns were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study of OPC-61815 in patients with CHF, exposure following a single IV administration of OPC-61815 16 mg was comparable with a single oral administration of tolvaptan 15 mg, with no safety concerns.

The Effect of Add-on Acetazolamide to Conventional Diuretics for Diuretic-resistant Edema Complicated with Hypercapnia: A Report of Two Cases

We herein report two cases in which add-on acetazolamide to furosemide was effective for diuretic-resistant volume overload and hypercapnia. Case 1 was a woman in her 40s presenting with volume overload due to the nephrotic syndrome with diabetes mellitus. Case 2 was a man in his 60s with fluid overload and non-nephrotic proteinuria and sepsis. In both cases, although fluid overload was resistant to high-dose loop diuretics and complicated with hypercapnia due to pulmonary effusion, add-on acetazolamide administration resulted in symptom resolution. The additional effect of acetazolamide occurred regardless of the degree of proteinuria and kidney function.

New Perspectives in the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Acute and chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a major public health problem, studies showing a 25% survival rate at 5 years after hospitalization. If left untreated, it is a common and potentially fatal disease. In recent years, the medical and device therapies of patients with HFrEF have significantly improved. The aim of our review is to provide an evidence-based update on new therapeutic strategies in acute and chronic settings, to prevent hospitalization and death in patients with HFrEF. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, and we included a number of 23 randomized controlled trials published in the last 30 years. The benefit of beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with HFrEF is well known. Recent developments, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, vericiguat, transcatheter mitral valve repair, wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitor and cardiac contractility modulation, have also proven effective in improving prognosis. In addition, other new therapeutic agents showed encouraging results, but they are currently being studied. The implementation of personalized disease management programs that directly target the cause of HFrEF is crucial in order to improve prognosis and quality of life for these patients.

Possible Option for Treatment of Severe Congestive Heart Failure Under Mechanical Ventilation Using Tolvaptan via Nasogastric Tube: A Single-Center Analysis

Background: The oral vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan causes aquaresis, and its effect on heart failure is proven. However, it is not recommended in patients who are unable to appropriately respond to thirst because of possible severe hypernatremia. Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of tolvaptan treatment via nasogastric tube in patients who are unable to respond to thirst by fluid ingestion. Methods: We analyzed 70 consecutive patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) who were resistant to loop diuretics and treated with tolvaptan. From the 70 patients, 12 required endotracheal intubation under sedation (Group Tube; GT) and 58 did not (Group Oral; GO). We administered tolvaptan orally in GO; however, in GT, we had to administer tolvaptan via nasogastric tube to achieve pulmonary decongestion quickly. In GT, serum sodium level was monitored closely, and intravenous fluid infusion volume was controlled in the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes, including safety and efficacy parameters, were evaluated. Results: In both groups, tolvaptan treatment did not develop a significant rise in serum sodium level compared with baseline, and the incidence of worsening renal failure was comparable, despite greater net fluid loss and higher doses of loop diuretics used in patients of GT compared to GO. In GT, all patients achieved pulmonary decongestion and were weaned from mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: In sedated patients with severe CHF who are unable to respond to thirst by fluid ingestion, tolvaptan can be used without clinically significant hypernatremia under close monitoring in the ICU.

Cost-Effectiveness of long-term tolvaptan administration for chronic heart failure treatment in Japan

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan (TLV) is effective for acute heart failure (HF) with congestion, but its long-term administration in patients with chronic HF (CHF) remains controversial. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment has not yet been investigated. Thus, we sought to validate the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment in Japan.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between long-term TLV strategy and the standard strategy using furosemide for CHF. The target population included 75-year-old patients with CHF. The effectiveness of the TLV strategy for CHF treatment was determined based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. We used a 10-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and a scenario analysis for patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide (≥60 mg per day).

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, the total cost of the long-term TLV strategy was higher than that of the standard strategy (\3,243,779 vs. \1,179,964). The total QALYs of the long-term TLV strategy were lower than those of the standard strategy (4.52 vs 4.59). Thus, a standard TLV prescription for CHF treatment has no clinical or economic benefit. In the scenario analysis (i.e. in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide), the long-term TLV strategy was more effective (total QALYs, 5.10 vs. 4.41) but more expensive (total costs, \3,540,558 vs. \1,272,208) than the standard strategy. The ICER of the TLV strategy against the standard strategy (¥3,289,579/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay of \5,000,000, which suggests that the long-term TLV strategy is cost-effective relative to the standard strategy in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term TLV administration did not provide a clear benefit for all patients with CHF. However, this treatment strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients who require high-dose furosemide.

Right ventricular contractility affects the clinical efficacy of add-on tolvaptan following hospitalization for heart failure in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common condition that is independently associated with high mortality rates in patients with heart failure (HF). Several studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of add-on tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for HF. However, the effects of add-on tolvaptan in patients with significant TR are less well understood. Among the patients with moderate-to-severe TR assessed by transthoracic echocardiography during hospitalization for congestive HF, 39 patients who could complete the clinical course after starting add-on tolvaptan were included in the study. Rehospitalization due to HF and cardiac death were defined as adverse cardiac events in this study. We investigated the presence or absence of cardiac events within 2 years following the introduction of tolvaptan and evaluated echocardiographic functional parameters associated with cardiac events. The average patient age was 75 ± 14 years, and 23 patients (59%) experienced adverse cardiac events within 2 years after add-on tolvaptan administration. Serum creatinine (mg/dL) and brain natriuretic peptide (pg/mL) concentrations at discharge were significantly higher in patients with cardiac events than in those without cardiac events {1.48 [1.02-1.58] vs. 1.07 [0.79-1.41], p = 0.03; 526 [414-1044] vs. 185 [104-476], p = 0.01, respectively}. The presence or absence of past hospitalization for HF was also significantly higher in the event-positive group compared to event-free group (78 vs. 44%, p = 0.04). Comparison of echocardiographic parameters revealed that patients with cardiac events had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (40 ± 16 vs. 49 ± 15%, p = 0.049) and lower right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) (35 ± 12 vs. 45 ± 10%, p = 0.008) than those without cardiac events. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that RVFAC and past hospitalization for HF were independently associated with cardiac events following the introduction of tolvaptan (odds ratio, 0.934 and 4.992; p = 0.048 and 0.04, respectively). Right ventricular contractility as well as past history of admission for HF, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and brain natriuretic peptide level at discharge may reflect the clinical outcomes after HF hospitalization in patients with significant TR who were treated with tolvaptan.

Clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure taking tolvaptan: a comparison of patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Few studies have investigated the clinical benefit of the long-term use of tolvaptan (TLV) for heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the long-term prognosis of patients administered TLV for > 1 year among patients who had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those who had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Overall, 591 consecutive patients were admitted to our hospital and administered TLV for HF between 2011 and 2018. We retrospectively enrolled 147 patients who were administered TLV for > 1 year. We divided them into the HFpEF group (n = 77, 52.4%) and the HFrEF group (n = 70; 47.6%). Their clinical backgrounds and long-term prognosis were examined. Compared with the patients in the HFrEF group, the patients in the HFpEF group were significantly older and included more women. Moreover, the HFpEF group showed significantly lower all-cause mortality (38.6% vs. 24.7%; log-rank, P = 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality during the average 2.7-year follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was correlated with male sex, HFpEF, and changes in serum creatinine levels from baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that HFpEF was an independent influencing factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.86; P = 0.017). Long-term administration of TLV may be more beneficial for HFpEF than for HFrEF.

Temporal trends in tolvaptan use after revision of national heart failure guidelines in Japan

Within no definite diuretic protocol for acute heart failure (AHF) patients and its variation in regional clinical guidelines, the latest national guidelines in Japan commends use of tolvaptan in diuretic-resistant patients. This study aimed to examine trends in tolvaptan usage and associated outcomes of AHF patients requiring hospitalization. Between April, 2018 and October, 2019, 1343 consecutive AHF patients (median 78 [69-85] year-old) were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry in Japan. Trends over time in tolvaptan usage, along with the severity of heart failure status based on the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF] risk score, and in-hospital outcomes were investigated. During the study period, tolvaptan usage has increased from 13.0 to 28.7% over time (p for trend = 0.07), and 49.4% started tolvaptan within 3 days after admission. The GWTG-HF risk score in the tolvaptan group has significantly decreased over time, while that in the non-tolvaptan group has unchanged. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate between the patients with and without tolvaptan (6.7% vs. 5.8%). After revision of the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for AHF in March 2018, tolvaptan usage for AHF patients has steadily increased. However, in-hospital outcomes including mortality do not seem to be affected.

Evidence based review of management of cardiorenal syndrome type 1

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type 1 is the development of acute kidney injury in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. CRS often results in prolonged hospitalization, a higher rate of rehospitalization, high morbidity, and high mortality. The pathophysiology of CRS is complex and involves hemodynamic changes, neurohormonal activation, hypothalamic-pituitary stress reaction, inflammation, and infection. However, there is limited evidence or guideline in managing CRS type 1, and the established therapeutic strategies mainly target the symptomatic relief of heart failure. This review will discuss the strategies in the management of CRS type 1. Six clinical studies have been included in this review that include different treatment strategies such as nesiritide, dopamine, levosimendan, tolvaptan, dobutamine, and ultrafiltration. Treatment strategies for CRS type 1 are derived based on the current literature. Early recognition and treatment of CRS can improve the outcomes of the patients significantly.

A cross-sectional survey of hospitalization and blood tests implementation status in patients who received tolvaptan under 75 years of age using a Japanese claims database

BACKGROUND

Hypernatremia and liver injury are typical adverse effects of tolvaptan. Therefore, hospitalization and frequent monitoring of serum sodium concentration and liver function are necessary for tolvaptan initiation. We performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate these situations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We employed the Japanese claims database, which contains data of patients aged < 75 years. Patients who were newly prescribed tolvaptan for fluid accumulation induced by chronic heart failure (FA-CHF) or liver cirrhosis (FA-LC) from January 2011 to June 2017 were included. We evaluated the hospitalization status and implementation of serum sodium and liver function tests in the evaluation period, based on the Japanese package insert.

RESULTS

Of 1,173 patients, 347 and 117 were enrolled in FA-CHF and FA-LC groups, respectively. Among them, 10.7% (FA-CHF group) and 5.13% (FA-LC group) were prescribed tolvaptan without hospitalization. In the FA-CHF group, 11.0% and 17.6% did not undergo serum sodium and liver function tests even once in the evaluation period, respectively, compared with 12.0% and 12.8% in the FA-LC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the deviation from Japanese package insert recommendations. This approach can be applied to other drugs and provides important perspectives on pharmacovigilance research.

Characterization of tolvaptan response and its impact on the outcome for patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Conventional diuretic therapy such as loop diuretics is a cornerstone of the treatment for heart failure (HF). Diuretic response is an important factor in determining resistance to HF therapy and has been shown to be associated with subsequent clinical outcome. Tolvaptan (TVP), a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has a favorable profile in terms of rapid fluid removal and less aggravation of renal function. We hypothesized that the response to TVP might be associated with the subsequent clinical outcome.

METHOD

In this single-center retrospective study, 148 consecutive HF patients who were administered TVP from 2014 through 2018 [age 79 (69-86) years, male 89 (60%)] were included. Ninety-six patients were divided into TVP responder [N = 39 (41%)] and non-responder groups based on the cut-off value of gained urine output (+ 93 ml/mg TVP /day) on the day after TVP was introduced.

RESULTS

Early TVP introduction (p = 0.012) and lower dose of loop diuretics (p = 0.043) were predictors of TVP responder. For 2 years after discharge, TVP responders showed more favorable outcomes regarding the primary endpoint defined as the composite of all-cause death and HF readmission (p = 0.034, log-rank test) and HF readmission (p = 0.005). A multivariable Cox model analysis revealed that TVP responder was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.48, p = 0.041). TVP responders had a lower number of HF readmissions over a 1-year period (p = 0.002). TVP response was independently associated with the number of HF readmissions (p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with an extended period between discharge and HF readmission after TVP administration was higher in responders than non-responders (67% vs. 23%, p = 0.006). These associations of TVP response and post-discharge outcomes were more evident in patients who continued TVP after discharge.

CONCLUSION

TVP response can be indicative of subsequent clinical outcomes and may be informative when considering advanced care planning.

Usefulness of Tolvaptan for the Postoperative Control After Kidney Transplantation in a Patient With Cardiac Hypofunction: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation in patients with cardiac hypofunction is challenging. Even if the surgery is successfully performed, these patients may suffer from low output cardiac function. We report the case of a patient with severe cardiac hypofunction who developed heart failure (HF) complicated with low output cardiac function, which markedly improved after the administration of tolvaptan, after successful living kidney transplantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old man was diagnosed with chronic renal failure of unknown etiology 4 years previously, for which hemodialysis was initiated. Three years previously, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed because of acute myocardial infarction. Since then, he had been hospitalized for the control of HF. He was referred to our department because he wished to undergo kidney transplantation. We decided to perform the transplantation after determining that he could tolerate the operation. On postoperative day 6, however, his urine discharge volume suddenly declined, leading to an increase in his body weight despite administration of an adequate amount of furosemide, and he was diagnosed with acute HF. The patient's condition markedly improved after the introduction of tolvaptan.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of improvement in postoperative HF after tolvaptan administration. Although numerous kidney transplantations have been performed at our institute, it is relatively rare that we decide to operate in a patient with severe cardiac hypofunction.

Long-term administration of tolvaptan ameliorates annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in outpatients with chronic heart failure

Protective effects of tolvaptan against worsening renal function in acute heart failure have been shown. However, long-term effects of its agent on renal function remain to be elucidated. The present study investigated retrospectively whether long-term treatment with tolvaptan exerts renoprotective effects in patients with chronic heart failure, by comparing serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for years before and after tolvaptan administration. From 63 outpatients with chronic heart failure taking diuretics including tolvaptan, 34 patients whose eGFR levels were continuously measured for more than 6 months both before and after administration of tolvaptan (average dose, 7.8 mg/day at the end of the follow-up period) were selected as eligible for the present analyses. All eGFR values were separately plotted before and after the initiation of treatment with tolvaptan (except hospitalization periods) along the time course axis and the slope of the linear regression curve was calculated as an annual change in eGFR. The mean follow-up periods before and after tolvaptan administration were 1197 and 784 days (3.3 and 2.1 years), respectively. Changing rates of eGFR per year were significantly ameliorated after treatment with tolvaptan (mean ± SD, - 8.02 ± 9.35 to - 1.62 ± 5.09 mL/min/1.73m² /year, P = 0.001). In echocardiographic parameters, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter significantly decreased after tolvaptan administration, and the decrease in IVC diameter was correlated with the improvement of eGFR decline slope after administration of tolvaptan (P = 0.0075). This longitudinal observational study indicated that long-term treatment with tolvaptan ameliorated annual decline in eGFR in outpatients with chronic heart failure. Our findings suggest that tolvaptan has a protective effect against chronically worsening renal function in heart failure patients.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema: results from a post-marketing surveillance study (START study)

BACKGROUND

This large-scale post-marketing surveillance study (START study) evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in Japanese liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema in real-world clinical settings. Here, we present the final analysis outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study involving patients who received tolvaptan for the treatment of liver cirrhosis with hepatic edema with an insufficient response to conventional diuretics. The observation period was up to 6 months. Effectiveness evaluation included changes in body weight and clinical symptoms. Safety analysis included evaluation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

RESULTS

Case reports of 1111 patients were collected. Of these, 1109 were included in the safety analysis and 1098 in the effectiveness analysis. The mean age was 69.4 ± 11.5 years and 695 (62.7%) patients were male. After tolvaptan treatment, a decrease in body weight from baseline was - 2.6 ± 2.7 kg on day 7 and - 3.8 ± 4.1 kg on day 14. Moreover, clinical symptoms significantly improved over the 14-day treatment. Frequently reported ADRs were thirst (6.6%), hepatic encephalopathy (2.3%), dehydration (1.5%), and hypernatremia (1.2%). A serum sodium level of ≥ 150 mEq/L was reported in five patients (0.5%). Multivariate analyses showed that the baseline blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level (cut-off value: 22.4 mg/dL) was the predictive factor for tolvaptan treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that tolvaptan was effective and well-tolerated in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema. In the real-world clinical setting, tolvaptan provides a useful option for the treatment of hepatic edema.

Tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an add-on to traditional diuretics in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined AHF patients treated with tolvaptan as a combination therapy with traditional diuretics published on or before December 2, 2019. Efficacy indicators such as improved dyspnea, reduced edema, and changes in urine output and body weight were evaluated. In-hospital mortality and worsening renal function (WRF) were measured as safety indicators. Data from the published literature included in this study were independently extracted by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Twelve RCTs involving 5577 patients admitted for AHF were included. Compared with traditional diuretics alone, add-on tolvaptan significantly relieved dyspnea, reduced weight, increased total urine volume and changes in urine volume from baseline, reduced edema, and increased serum sodium concentration in the short term without increasing the mortality. Most importantly, a low dose of tolvaptan (7.5-15 mg/d) significantly reduced the incidence of WRF, while a high dose (30 mg/d) had the opposite effect. Short-term add-on tolvaptan in hospitalized AHF patients could significantly relieve shortness of breath, reduce body weight, improve edema, and increase urine output and serum sodium concentrations without increasing mortality. The protective effects of add-on tolvaptan against WRF, however, were observed at low doses, but not at high doses.

Renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients with new-onset acute heart failure

AIMS

Although tolvaptan has been reported to prevent worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with advanced acute heart failure (AHF), evidence regarding the effect of tolvaptan on renal function in patients with new-onset AHF is not available. This study aimed to investigate the renoprotective effect of tolvaptan in patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 122 consecutive patients hospitalized with new-onset AHF between May 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. WRF was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.4 μmol/L) within 48 h or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine after hospitalization. The furosemide group (n = 75) and the tolvaptan add-on group (n = 47) were compared. The tolvaptan group consists of patients who received tolvaptan as an individual physicians' decision. The incidence of WRF was significantly lower in the tolvaptan add-on group (8.5%) than in the furosemide group (24.0%, P = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tolvaptan treatment was an independent variable related to the prevention of WRF [odds ratio (OR), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.85]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed a more favourable effect of tolvaptan in patients with serum creatinine ≥1.1 mg/dL on admission (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.98) and an ejection fraction <50% (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower incidence of WRF was observed in patients with new-onset AHF who were treated with the tolvaptan add-on therapy, specifically those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and renal impairment on admission.

Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure

Decompensated heart failure accounts for approximately 1 million hospitalizations in the United States annually, and this number is expected to increase significantly in the near future. Diuretics provide the initial management in most patients with fluid overload. However, the development of diuretic resistance remains a significant challenge in the treatment of heart failure. Due to the lack of a standard definition, the prevalence of this phenomenon remains difficult to determine, with some estimates suggesting that 25-30% of patients with heart failure have diuretic resistance. Certain characteristics, including low systolic blood pressures, renal impairment, and atherosclerotic disease, help predict the development of diuretic resistance. The underlying pathophysiology is likely multifactorial, with pharmacokinetic alterations, hormonal dysregulation, and the cardiorenal syndrome having significant roles. The therapeutic approach to this common problem typically involves increases in the diuretic dose and/or frequency, sequential nephron blockade, and mechanical fluid movement removal with ultrafiltration or peritoneal dialysis. Paracentesis is potentially useful in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

The impact of worsening renal function with elevated B-type natriuretic peptide at discharge on 1-year prognosis in heart failure patients

There are a few studies about the clinical impacts of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at discharge with the occurrence of worsening renal function (WRF) on mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). We divided total 301 patients with acute decompensated HF into four groups by the median value (278.7 pg/mL) of BNP level at discharge and by the occurrence of WRF. WRF developed in 100 patients (33.2%). Cardiovascular mortality was significantly different between the four groups (P = 0.0002). Patients with WRF and elevated BNP had a higher cardiovascular mortality than patients without WRF and elevated BNP in Cox proportional hazard models (hazard ratio [HR], 10.48; 95% confident interval [95% CI], 1.27–225.53; P = 0.03). Patients with either WRF or elevated BNP did not have an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to patients without WRF and elevated BNP. Regarding HF readmission and cardiovascular mortality, patients with WRF and elevated BNP had the highest risk (HR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.07–14.30, P = 0.0003) and patients with either WRF or elevated BNP had a higher risk than patients without WRF and elevated BNP. The occurrence of WRF combined with elevated BNP at discharge was associated with increased 1-year cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission.

Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of people with heart failure have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD have the potential to reduce death (any cause) or hospitalisations for decompensated heart failure. However, these interventions are of uncertain benefit and may increase the risk of harm, such as hypotension and electrolyte abnormalities, in those with CKD.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to look at the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for HF (i.e., antihypertensive agents, inotropes, and agents that may improve the heart performance indirectly) in people with HF and CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies through 12 September 2019 in consultation with an Information Specialist and using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of any pharmacological intervention for acute or chronic heart failure, among people of any age with chronic kidney disease of at least three months duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the records to identify eligible studies and extracted data on the following dichotomous outcomes: death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure, worsening kidney function, hyperkalaemia, and hypotension. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate treatment effects, which we expressed as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We applied the GRADE methodology to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and twelve studies met our selection criteria: 15 were studies of adults with CKD; 16 studies were conducted in the general population but provided subgroup data for people with CKD; and 81 studies included individuals with CKD, however, data for this subgroup were not provided. The risk of bias in all 112 studies was frequently high or unclear. Of the 31 studies (23,762 participants) with data on CKD patients, follow-up ranged from three months to five years, and study size ranged from 16 to 2916 participants. In total, 26 studies (19,612 participants) reported disaggregated and extractable data on at least one outcome of interest for our review and were included in our meta-analyses. In acute heart failure, the effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonists, dopamine, nesiritide, or serelaxin on death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure or kidney function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. In chronic heart failure, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (4 studies, 5003 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; I2 = 78%; low certainty evidence), aldosterone antagonists (2 studies, 34 participants: RR 0.61 95% CI 0.06 to 6.59; very low certainty evidence), and vasopressin receptor antagonists (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.89; 2 studies, 1840 participants; low certainty evidence) on death (any cause) were uncertain. Treatment with beta-blockers may reduce the risk of death (any cause) (4 studies, 3136 participants: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Treatment with ACEi or ARB (2 studies, 1368 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; I2 = 97%; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hospitalisation for heart failure, as treatment estimates were consistent with either benefit or harm. Treatment with beta-blockers may decrease hospitalisation for heart failure (3 studies, 2287 participants: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.05; I2 = 87%; low certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia compared to placebo or no treatment (3 studies, 826 participants: RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.03 to 4.17; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). Renin inhibitors had uncertain risks of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 142 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.49; I2 = 0%; very low certainty). We were unable to estimate whether treatment with sinus node inhibitors affects the risk of hyperkalaemia, as there were few studies and meta-analysis was not possible. Hyperkalaemia was not reported for the CKD subgroup in studies investigating other therapies. The effects of ACEi or ARB, or aldosterone antagonists on worsening heart failure or kidney function, hypotension, or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. Effects of anti-arrhythmic agents, digoxin, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, renin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, vasodilators, and vasopressin receptor antagonists were very uncertain due to the paucity of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD are uncertain and there is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. Study data for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure and CKD are sparse despite the potential impact of kidney impairment on the benefits and harms of treatment. Future research aimed at analysing existing data in general population HF studies to explore the effect in subgroups of patients with CKD, considering stage of disease, may yield valuable insights for the management of people with HF and CKD.

Efficacy of Tolvaptan in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: There is no known therapy with proven efficacy for improving clinical outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) in elderly HFpEF patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved 100 consecutive elderly HFpEF patients hospitalized at the Nagoya Heart Center, Japan. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged ≥75 years; (2) first hospitalization secondary to HF; (3) received medical therapy for HF, without invasive treatment; and (4) clinical follow-up for >6 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to worsening HF, and the secondary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF) during hospitalization and at 6 months after discharge. Sixty background-matched HFpEF patients were divided into 2 groups: with TLV therapy (TLV (+), n = 29) and without TLV therapy (TLV (–), n = 31). In the TLV (+) group, TLV therapy was continued after discharge. Clinical outcomes of these patients were evaluated. Results: Bed rest period and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TLV (+) group than in the TLV (−) group. The dose of loop diuretics, mean serum creatinine levels, and incidence of WRF development were significantly lower in the TLV (+) group. Incidence of rehospitalization was also significantly lower in the TLV (+) group (log-rank test; p = 0.018). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TLV therapy reduces the incidence of rehospitalization in elderly patients with HFpEF. Conclusions: TLV therapy reduced the bed rest period, length of hospital stay, and rate of rehospitalization without WRF in elderly HFpEF patients, suggesting that TLV could represent an effective therapy for this group of patients.

Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tolvaptan in Patients With Heart Failure - Final Results of the Samsca Post-Marketing Surveillance in Heart Failure (SMILE) Study

BACKGROUND

In Japan, tolvaptan is indicated for patients with heart failure and volume overload who have inadequate response to other diuretics. In contrast to the USA and Europe, tolvaptan can be used in Japan in patients with normal sodium levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicenter, non-interventional, post-marketing surveillance study, prospective data from 3,349 patients treated with tolvaptan over a 5-year period were analyzed to identify benefits and risks. By Day 2 of treatment, 76.9% of evaluable patients had an increase in baseline 24-h urine volume (tolvaptan responders). Mean change in body weight was similar between 7.5 mg and 15 mg dosage groups (-3.6±3.9 kg and -3.7±4.0 kg, respectively). Improvement or disappearance rates for congestive symptoms from baseline to Day 14 ranged from 77.7% for lower limb edema to 51.1% for 3rd sound. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 18.1% of patients, most frequently thirst (8.4%). No case of central pontine myelinolysis was reported. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients with improved sodium concentration and increased 24-h urine volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan in real-world clinical settings was confirmed in this large-scale analysis. The 7.5-mg dose was equally as effective as the 15-mg dose and had a better safety profile. Improvements in all-cause mortality were suggested in tolvaptan responders.

Obestatin ameliorates water retention in chronic heart failure by downregulating renal aquaporin 2 through GPR39, V2R and PPARG signaling

AIMS

Obestatin regulates water metabolism by inhibiting arginine vasopressin (AVP) release and upregulated obestatin has been detected in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, the significance of obestatin in CHF, particularly with regard to water retention and aquaporin 2 (AQP2) expression, remains unknown.

MAIN METHODS

Using a CHF rat model, the effects of 2-week exogenous obestatin administration were evaluated. Expression of AQP2 was evaluated by immunoblotting, immunohistochemical staining, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in CHF rat model and mouse inner medullary collecting duct (mIMCD) 3 cell line. Moreover, the influence of obestatin on the genetic transcription profile in mIMCD3 cells was evaluated by microarray, and the potential regulatory mechanisms of obestatin on AQP2 were evaluated by RNA silencing of vasopressin receptor 2 (V2R), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG), and G protein-coupled receptor 39 (GPR39).

KEY FINDINGS

Obestatin increased urinary output and improved expression of CHF biomarker without significantly altering cardiac function, plasma electrolyte concentrations, or the plasma AVP concentration. AQP2 expression was significantly reduced. The results of microarray analyses and qPCR indicated that mRNA levels of Aqp2, Pparg, and V2r were significantly decreased. Inhibition of V2r and Pparg mRNA further reduced the expression of AQP2, while the inhibitory efficacy of obestatin on AQP2 was significantly offset after Gpr39 knockdown.

SIGNIFICANCE

Long-term treatment with obestatin improves water retention in CHF by increasing urinary output through downregulation of AQP2 expression in renal IMCD cells. These effects may be at least partially mediated by regulation of GPR39, V2R and PPARG signaling.

Effects of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: meta-analysis on randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Treating acute decompensated heartfailure (ADHF) for improving congestion with diuretics may cause worsening renal function (WRF), but the clinical efficacy of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients is inconsistent. This analysis is to evaluate the effects of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomised trials of tolvaptan add-on therapy on reducing WRF in ADHF patients. The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant articles from their inception to 31 October, 2017. Two reviewers filtrated the documents on WRF, short-term all-cause mortality, body weight decreased, elevated sodium level for calculating pooled relatives risks, weighted mean difference and associated 95% CIs. We used fixed-effects or random-effects models according to I² statistics.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Seven random controlled trials with 937 patients were included for analysis. Compared with the control, tolvaptan add-on therapy did not improve incidence of worsening renal function (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.26, p=0.31, I²=66%) and short-term all-cause mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.56, p=0.61, I²=0%). On subgroup analyses, there was a suggestion of possible effect modification by dose of tolvaptan, in which benefit was observed in low-dose (≤15 mg/day) group (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.02, p=0.05, I²=54%), but not with high-dose (30 mg) group (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.78, p=0.05, I²=0%). However, tolvaptan add-on therapy reduced body weight in 2 days (standardised mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.34, p<0.00001, I²=0%), increased sodium level (mean difference 1.56, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.07, p=0.04, I²=0%).

CONCLUSION

The result suggests that comparing with the standard diuretic therapy, tolvaptan add-on therapy did not reduce the incidence of WRF and short-term mortality, however, it can decrease body weight and increase the sodium level in patients who are with ADHF. Further researches are still required for confirmation.

Clinical safety and efficacy of tolvaptan for acute phase therapy in patients with low-flow and normal-flow severe aortic stenosis

Conventional diuretic therapy for low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (SAS) often has an inadequate effect or causes hemodynamic instability. Tolvaptan is used for acute heart failure in addition to conventional diuretics, and it does not cause intravascular dehydration. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of tolvaptan in the acute phase in 56 consecutive patients with SAS and compared LF-SAS with normal-flow (NF) SAS. The primary endpoints were adverse clinical events (death, worsening heart failure, worsening renal failure, fatal arrhythmia, cardiogenic or hypovolemic shock, and use of inotropic agents) and the volume of urine within 48 h of tolvaptan administration. Among 56 patients, 16 had LF-SAS (29%), and 40 had NF-SAS (71%). Severe adverse clinical events were not observed 48 h after tolvaptan administration. In both groups, the urine volume significantly increased after tolvaptan administration in comparison to 24 h before tolvaptan administration (both, p < 0.01). There were no changes in the urine volume during the initial 24 and 48 h. In the LF-SAS group, tolvaptan resulted in a significant decrease in fluid balance during the initial 24 and 48 h compared to 24 h before tolvaptan administration (p < 0.05). Adding tolvaptan to conventional treatment is safe and effective without renal dysfunction and hypotension in patients with SAS, including those with LF.

Tolvaptan for Volume Management in Heart Failure

Volume management in acute decompensated and chronic heart failure (HF) remains a significant challenge. Although progress has been made in the development of mortality-reducing neurohormonal regimens in the reduced ejection fraction population, no clinical trial has yet demonstrated anything more than symptomatic relief or biomarker reduction with pharmacotherapeutic volume-based interventions made in the acutely decompensated individual or those with evolving outpatient congestion. As the number of patients with HF continues to grow, in addition to HF-related hospitalizations, identifying therapies that have the potential to aid in diuresis more safely and efficaciously is paramount to decreasing inpatient length of stay and preventing unnecessary admissions. More recently, a significant amount of research has been dedicated to the use of vasopressin antagonists, specifically tolvaptan, as adjunctive therapy to loop and thiazide diuretics. Although these agents do not seem to have a pervasive role in fluid management in the acute decompensated and chronic HF populations, they are effective tools to have available for specific clinical situations. This review summarizes the literature surrounding the use of tolvaptan for volume management in congestive HF, as well as offering practical guidance for use of this agent.

Hemodynamic and Hormonal Effects of Tolvaptan for Heart Failure

Tolvaptan (TLV) is a diuretic agent administrated for heart failure (HF) only in Japan. Many clinical findings have been obtained from the accumulation of clinical experience, and the administration of TLV reportedly avoids causing a reduction in the renal function. In addition, TLV has been reported to exert effects other than diuresis. The early start of TLV after hospitalization shortens the length of the hospital stay, and continuous TLV after discharge extends the period until re-hospitalization of HF patients. TLV is thought to function via vasopressin V2 receptor antagonism. However, no significant differences in the long-term prognosis were noted between the group using TLV and not using TLV in the Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study (EVEREST) trial, and effects other than diuresis are not useful for all HF patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients who may experience effects other than diuresis with TLV administration. The accumulation of more patients and findings from further large-scale clinical trials will be necessary in order to clarify these points.

New therapies for the treatment of heart failure: a summary of recent accomplishments

Despite continuous efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), heart failure prevails as the number one cause of death in developed countries. To properly treat CVDs, scientists had to take a closer look at the factors that contribute to their pathogenesis and either modernize current pharmaceuticals or develop brand new treatments. Enhancement of current drugs, such as tolvaptan and omecamtiv mecarbil, sheds new light on already-known therapies. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, could be adopted in heart failure therapy as it reduces pre- and afterload by decreasing systolic blood pressure and blood volume. Omecamtiv mecarbil, which is a myosin binding peptide, could aid cardiac contractility. The next generation vasodilators, serelaxin and ularitide, are based on naturally occurring peptides and they reduce peripheral vascular resistance and increase the cardiac index. In combination with their anti-inflammatory properties, they could turn out to be extremely potent drugs for heart failure treatment. Cardiotrophin has exceeded many researchers’ expectations, as evidence suggests that it could cause sarcomere hypertrophy without excessive proliferation of connective tissue. Rapid progress in gene therapy has caused it to finally be considered as one of the viable options for the treatment of CVDs. This novel therapeutic approach could restore stable heart function either by restoring depleted membrane proteins or by balancing the intracellular calcium concentration. Although it has been set back by problems concerning its long-term effects, it is still highly likely to succeed.

Addition of Tolvaptan Compared With Increased Dose of Furosemide in Heart Failure Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Under Furosemide Treatment

Background: Given that residual congestion is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with heart failure (HF), a therapeutic strategy for decongestion is required.

Methods and Results: Eighteen HF patients with fluid retention despite oral furosemide >20 mg/day, with chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], <59 mL/min/1.73 m²) were enrolled. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: a tolvaptan group (tolvaptan, 7.5 mg/day, n=10) and a furosemide group (additional furosemide 20 mg/day, n=8), and followed up for 7 days. The urine volume significantly increased on day 3 in the tolvaptan group but not in the furosemide group. The body weight significantly decreased in the tolvaptan compared with the furosemide group on days 3 and 5. Although there was no difference in serum creatinine or eGFR in the 7 days between the 2 groups, serum cystatin C significantly decreased on day 7 in the tolvaptan group compared with the furosemide group. The residual congestion was more improved in the tolvaptan group than in the furosemide group.

Conclusions: Adding tolvaptan but not furosemide significantly increased urine volume, decreased body weight and improved residual congestion without affecting the renal function or electrolytes in patients with HF with CKD under furosemide treatment.

Renoprotective Benefit of Tolvaptan in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients With Loop Diuretic-Resistant Status

Background

While reduction of accumulated body fluid using loop diuretics is a commonly used therapeutic option for acute heart failure (AHF), some patients, especially those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), show significantly poor treatment response to loop diuretics. Tolvaptan (TLV) has shown effectiveness against AHF in several studies. We have been using TLV for AHF treatment, and it displayed favorable outcome even in patients with CKD. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of TLV in AHF patients.

Methods

Ninety-nine AHF patients who were hospitalized were assessed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: TLV treatment (TLV group, n = 39) and conventional treatment (non-TLV group, n = 60). We retrospectively examined the efficacy of TLV combination therapy for renal insufficiency complications and loop diuretic-resistant AHF patients, and the detail analysis was performed for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients.

Results

Changes in serum electrolyte levels before and after the treatment were similar in both groups. Although the patients in the TLV group at baseline displayed significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) indicating renal insufficiency probably due to higher dose of loop diuretics, the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF) was significantly lower than those in non-TLV group in HFpEF (TLV: 2.5% vs. non-TLV: 15.4%, P = 0.01). We performed logistic regression analysis and found that TLV was an independent contributing factor for reducing WRF (odds ratio: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.98, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that TLV application in acute stage may be renoprotective for AHF patients with CKD, especially in HFpEF.