Comparison of burst versus ramp antitachycardia pacing therapy for ventricular tachycardia: A meta-analysis

Current guidelines recommend at least one attempt of defibrillator antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, showing preference for burst therapy. The objective of this study is to compare ramp versus burst ATP therapy proportion of success and acceleration in treating spontaneous or induced ventricular tachycardia (VT). The review protocol was previously published in PROSPERO. Data synthesis and measures of heterogeneity (I² ) was performed by CMA® software v.3 comparing proportions in both groups. Sensitivity analysis was performed as subgroup or meta-regression according to quality, clinical characteristics, and differences in design. Thirteen studies including 30,117 VT episodes in 1672 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the proportion of success between burst and ramp therapy in spontaneous VT (odds ratio = 1.116; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.788-1.579; I²  = 89%). There was no significant difference in the proportion of success between burst and ramp therapy in induced VT (odds ratio = 0.820; 95% CI = 0.468-1.437; I²  = 93%). No significant difference was found in the proportion of acceleration between burst and ramp in spontaneous VT (odds ratio = 0.792; 95% CI = 0.476-1.317; I²  = 83%). No significant difference was found in the proportion of acceleration between burst and ramp in induced VT (odds ratio = 1.234; 95% CI = 0.802-1.898; I²  = 55%). Sensitivity analysis did not change main results. There is no difference in success or in acceleration proportion between burst or ramp ATP therapy irrespective if the VT was spontaneous or induced. Future implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming guidelines should offer both ATP therapies without preference in one of them.

Fitness to Drive After Syncope and/or in Cardiovascular Disease - An Overview and Practical Advice

The risk of syncope occurring while driving has implications for personal and public safety. Little is thought about the medical considerations related to the driving of motor vehicles. Physicians treating patients with cardiovascular disease need to acquire basic competences to be able to advise them about their fitness to drive. Current knowledge, governmental regulations, and recommendations concerning fitness to drive in patients with syncope and/or cardiovascular disease are presented. Narrative review with educational and clinical advice. Cardiovascular disease can make a driver lose control of a vehicle without warning and thereby lead to an accident. The main pathophysiological mechanisms of sudden loss of control are disturbances of brain perfusion (eg, syncope with or without cardiac arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation or asystole, stroke, etc.) and marked general weakness (eg, after major surgery or in heart failure). Patients with syncope and/or cardiovascular disease should be properly advised by their physicians about their fitness to drive, and restrictions should be documented.

Elevated plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine and the risk for arrhythmic death in ischemic and non-ischemic, dilated cardiomyopathy - A prospective, controlled long-term study

INTRODUCTION

Elevated plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an inhibitor of NO synthase, are associated with adverse outcome. There is no data available, whether ADMA levels are associated with arrhythmic death (AD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or non-ischemic, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 110 ICM, 52 DCM and 30 control patients were included. Primary outcome parameter of this prospective study was arrhythmic death (AD) or resuscitated cardiac arrest (RCA). Plasma levels of ADMA were significantly higher in ICM (p < 0.001) and in DCM (p < 0.001) patients compared to controls. During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 62 (32.3%) patients died. AD occurred in 26 patients and RCA was observed in 22 patients. Plasma levels of ADMA were not associated with a significantly increased risk of AD or RCA in ICM (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37, p = 0.109) or in DCM (HR = 1.06, p = 0.848) patients. No significant association was found with overall mortality in ICM (HR = 1.39, p = 0.079) or DCM (HR = 1.10, p = 0.666) patients. Stratified Kaplan-Meier curves for ADMA levels in the upper tertile (>0.715 µmol/l) or the two lower tertiles (≤0.715 µmol/l) did not show a higher risk for AD or RCA (p = 0.221) or overall mortality (p = 0.548). In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, ADMA was not associated with AD or RCA (HR = 1.35, p = 0.084) or with overall mortality (HR = 1.24, p = 0.162).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma levels of ADMA were elevated in patients with ICM or DCM as compared to controls, but were not significantly predictive for overall mortality or the risk for arrhythmic death.

Importance of Diastolic Function for the Prediction of Arrhythmic Death: A Prospective, Observer-Blinded, Long-Term Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) face a high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Exact grading of diastolic function might improve risk stratification for arrhythmic death.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 120 patients with ischemic, 60 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 30 patients with normal LVEF. Diastolic function was graded normal (N) or dysfunction grade I to III. Primary outcome parameter was arrhythmic death (AD) or resuscitated cardiac arrest (RCA).

RESULTS

Normal diastolic function was found in 23 (11%) patients, dysfunction grade I in 107 (51%), grade II in 31 (14.8%), and grade III in 49 (23.3%) patients, respectively. After an average follow-up of 7.0±2.6 years, AD or RCA was observed in 28 (13.3%) and 33 (15.7%) patients, respectively. Nonarrhythmic death was found in 41 (19.5%) patients. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with dysfunction grade III had the highest risk for AD or RCA (P<0.001). This finding was independent from the degree of LVEF dysfunction and was observed in patients with LVEF≤35% (P=0.001) and with LVEF>35% (P=0.014). Nonarrhythmic mortality was the highest in patients with dysfunction grade III. This was true for patients with LVEF≤35% (P=0.009) or >35% (P<0.001). In an adjusted model for relevant confounding factors, grade III dysfunction was associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk for AD or RCA in the overall study population (hazard ratio=3.52; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic dysfunction is associated with a high risk for AD or RCA regardless if LVEF is ≤35% or >35%. Diastolic function grading might improve risk stratification for AD.

Sex difference in inappropriate therapy and survival among 1471 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients

Introduction

To assess a potential relationship between sex and outcome in recipients of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD).

Methods and Results

All 1471 ICD recipients between 2000 and 2015 were sex‐related analyzed with the following outcome parameters: overall survival (OS), the occurrence of inappropriate and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and shock therapy. We followed 1206 (82%) male and 265 (18%) female ICD recipients during 4.1 ± 3.6 and 4.3 ± 3.8 years, respectively, (P = .369). Kaplan‐Meier analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in OS between female and male patients (P = .132). After adjustment for relevant confounding factors in a multivariate model, sex remained a nonsignificant predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio [male] = 1.11; P = .493). Negative binomial regression analysis revealed that women received less appropriate ATP therapy (rate ratio [RR] = 0.37; P = .043), whereas rates of appropriate shock therapy (RR = 1.95; P = .369) did not differ between women and men. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of inappropriate ATP (RR = 1.22; P = .715) and inappropriate shock therapy (RR = 0.64; P = .121).

Conclusion

Female and male patients equally benefit from ICD therapy in terms of OS. Women are less likely to receive appropriate ATP therapy, whereas appropriate shock and inappropriate ATP and shock therapy are independent of sex.