Regenerative Effect of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in a Rat Model of Established Limb Ischemia

Mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation ameliorates fibrosis and microRNA dysregulation in skeletal muscle ischemia

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with lower-extremity muscle wasting. Hallmark features of PAD-associated skeletal muscle pathology include loss of skeletal muscle mass, reduced strength and physical performance, increased inflammation, fibrosis, and adipocyte infiltration. At the molecular level, skeletal muscle ischemia has also been associated with gene and microRNA (miRNA) dysregulation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been shown to enhance muscle regeneration and improve muscle function in various skeletal muscle injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intramuscularly delivered human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) on skeletal muscle ischemia. Herein, we report an hUC-MSC-mediated amelioration of ischemia-induced skeletal muscle atrophy and function via enhancement of myofiber regeneration, reduction of tissue inflammation, adipocyte accumulation, and tissue fibrosis. These changes were observed in the absence of cell-mediated enhancement of blood flow recovery as measured by laser Doppler imaging. Furthermore, reduced tissue fibrosis in the hUC-MSC-treated group was associated with upregulation of miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-29b and downregulation of targeted pro-fibrotic genes such as Col1a1 and Fn1. Our results support the use of hUC-MSCs as a novel approach to reduce fibrosis and promote skeletal muscle regeneration after ischemic injury in patients with PAD.

Decadal analysis of efficacy and safety profiles of mesenchymal stem cells from varied sources in knee osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is a debilitating degenerative joint ailment afflicting millions of patients. Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from various sources for KOA treatment, yet direct comparisons are scarce and inconsistent. Furthermore, network meta-analysis (NMA) conclusions require updating, while the safety of MSCs therapy remains contentious. This study evaluates therapeutic approaches involving MSCs from different sources in patients with KOA through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The objective is to compare the effectiveness and safety of MSCs strategies from various sources for KOA treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RCTs and cohort studies comparing different sources of MSCs in KOA patients. A randomized effects network meta-analysis was used to concurrently evaluate both direct and indirect comparisons across all protocols.

RESULTS

The NMA included 16 RCTS and reported 1005 participants. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) were the most effective treatment, showing significant improvements in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Short Form 36 (SF-36 scale), the International Knee Literature Committee Knee Evaluation Scale (IKDC subjective scores), and the Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS). The probabilities are P = 85.3, P = 70.5, P = 88 and P = 87, respectively. Compared with placebo, AD-MSCs resulted in a VAS Score (SMD 0.97; 95%CI 0.37, 1.57), IKDC subjective scores (SMD -0.71; 95%CI -1.20, -0.21) was significantly reduced. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) showed significant improvements in the University of Western Ontario and McMaster University OA (WOMAC) (P = 91.4). Compared with placebo, UC-MSCs had a higher WOMAC Score (SMD 1.65; 95%CI 0.27, 3.03) and ranked first. Compared with MSCs, placebo emerged as the safer option (P = 74.9), with a notable reduction in AEs associated with HA treatment (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.61, 0.97). AD-MSCs were found to have the least favorable impact on AEs with a probability of P = 13.3.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis established that MSCs offer pain relief and enhance various knee scores in KOA patients compared to conventional treatment. It also identifies other therapeutic avenues warranting further exploration through high-quality studies. Nonetheless, it underscores the necessity to emphasize the potential complications and safety concerns associated with MSCs.

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells for Therapeutic Angiogenesis

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are known to possess medicinal properties to facilitate vascular regeneration. Recent advances in the understanding of the utilities of MSCs in physiological/pathological tissue repair and technologies in isolation, expansion, and enhancement strategies have led to the use of MSCs for vascular disease-related treatments. Various conditions, including chronic arterial occlusive disease, diabetic ulcers, and chronic wounds, cause significant morbidity in patients. Therapeutic angiogenesis by cell therapy has led to the possibilities of treatment options in promoting angiogenesis, treating chronic wounds, and improving amputation-free survival. Current perspectives on the options for the use of MSCs for therapeutic angiogenesis in vascular research and in medicine, either as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional interventions, for treating patients with peripheral artery diseases are discussed in this review.