Triple valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical valves: is the mechanical valve the proper choice for the tricuspid position?

Long-Term Results of Triple-Valve Procedure

Triple-valve procedures are associated with high early and late mortality. We reviewed our experience in 25 patients who underwent combined mitral and aortic valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair or replacement between 1979 and 2004. The mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 10 days to 24.5 years). The mean age at operation was 52 years (range, 31 to 72 years). Four patients underwent triple-valve replacement and 21 had double-valve replacement and tricuspid annuloplasty. Perioperative mortality was 20% and late mortality was 24%. Cumulative survival, calculated taking perioperative mortality into account, was 71% ± 10% at 10 years and 36% ± 15% at 15 years after surgery. Only 1 of 20 perioperative survivors required re-operation for prosthetic valve dysfunction. Double-valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty offers satisfactory long-term survival with freedom from thromboembolism and re-operation.

Triple valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease: short- and mid-term survival in modern era

OBJECTIVES

Triple valve replacement (TVR) is still deemed a complex and challenging choice for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and carries significant mortality and morbidity. We report the short- and mid-term results after TVR in the last decade.

METHODS

In a historical cohort, ninety consecutive patients, at a mean age of 47 ± 12 years underwent TVR between 2003 and 2013 for RHD. Most of the patients were in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictors of overall and event-free survival.

RESULTS

The 30-day hospital mortality rate was 6% (n = 5). One-year and 4-year overall survival (cardiac survival) rates were 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively. One-year and 4-year rates of freedom from cardiac events (e.g. cardiac death, cardiac rehospitalization, cardiac reoperation, cerebrovascular events, anticoagulation-related major haemorrhage and significant valvular malfunction) were 83.5 and 69.5%, respectively. Age, diabetes and pump time were the independent predictors of overall survival, and diabetes and hypertension were the independent predictors of event-free survival. One-year and 4-year freedom rates from anticoagulation-related major haemorrhage were 96.6 and 90.7%, respectively. The 1-year and 4-year rates of freedom from a composite of valvular thrombosis, major bleeding events and thromboemboli were 94.1 and 88.5%, respectively. One-year and 4-year freedom rates from cardiac rehospitalization were 94.0 and 88.0%, respectively. One-year and 4-year rates of freedom from cardiac reoperation were 98.8 and 93.9%, respectively. One-year and 4-year rates of freedom from significant prosthetic valve malfunction (e.g. structural valve deterioration, valve thrombosis and paravalvular leakage) were 96.6 and 90.7%, respectively. The 1-year and 4-year rates of freedom from major adverse valve-related events were 86.3 and 78.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TVR for RHD appears to confer satisfactory short- and mid-term results with excellent symptomatic improvement. The overall mortality following TVR may be improved by early surgical treatment before the NYHA functional class IV.

Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Replacement in the Current Era

BACKGROUND

Regardless of the indication, tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) has historically been associated with high mortality and morbidity. We report the results of our experience in a high-risk patient population with an emphasis on operative mortality, long-term survival, and valve related events according to the type of prosthesis.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 1999 TVR was performed in 81 patients (isolated n = 25, combined with valve surgery n = 44, combined with CABG or other n = 12). The mean age was 61 years old (range 19-83 years old). Risk factors included New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (n = 73, 90%), reoperation (n = 58, 72%), urgent/emergent indication (n = 62, 76%), and hepatic dysfunction (n = 13, 16%). Mean pulmonary artery pressure was 34 mmHg. Etiology of tricuspid regurgitation was classified as functional (n = 18, 22%) or organic (n = 52, 64%), or failed previous tricuspid valve surgery (n = 11, 14%).

RESULTS

Tricuspid valve replacement was performed with either a bioprosthetic (n = 34, 42%) or mechanical valve (n = 47, 58%). The overall operative mortality was 22% (n = 18). Risk factors for mortality included urgent/emergent status, age greater than 50 years old, functional etiology, and elevated pulmonary artery pressure. Of the 60 survivors, 26 (43%) died during follow up. After univariate analysis, organic etiology was the only predictor of late death (p = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival at 2.5, 5, and 10 years was 80%, 60%, and 45% for bioprosthetic, and 84%, 69%, and 59% for mechanical valves, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring TVR are typically high-risk with a high-percentage of reoperations, concomitant cardiac procedures, and end-stage functional class. Operative and overall mortality remains high. Heart failure was the predominant cause of early and late deaths, emphasizing importance of timely referral before the development of end-stage cardiac impairment.