Localized expression of histamine H1 receptors in syncytiotrophoblast cells of human placenta

The Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome After First Trimester Exposure to H1 Antihistamines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

H1 antihistamines are used for the treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy as well as the symptomatic relief of asthma, urticaria, allergy, and the common cold. Although they are overall felt to be safe during pregnancy, recently several studies have challenged this assumption, as millions of women are exposed to them in the first trimester.

METHODS

Following the guidelines of PRISMA, a systematic review was performed to retrieve all published articles involving H1-antihistamine exposure during pregnancy. Electronic databases including PubMed and EMBASE were searched for possibly relevant articles published in any language up to December 2015.

RESULTS

After removing duplicate publications, and excluding animal studies and studies on drug effectiveness, 342 articles were reviewed in detail and 37 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. In cohort studies, the risk of major malformation in the offspring of women exposed to H1 antihistamines was not higher than that of the control population (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.98-1.16). The Q-statistic for heterogeneity of effects was not significant (p > 0.05, I ² < 25%) and there was no evidence of publication bias. Similar results were achieved with case-control studies (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.90-1.23). Similarly, H1 antihistamines were not associated with more spontaneous abortions (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.83-1.20), prematurity (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.76-1.20), stillbirth (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.48-3.18) or low birth weight (OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.63-2.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analyses, which included a large number of studies, H1 antihistamines are not associated with an increased risk of major malformation or other adverse fetal outcomes. This study provides important information to both pregnant women and their healthcare providers regarding the safety and risk of H1 antihistamine use during this sensitive time.

Early pregnancy exposure to antihistamines and risk of congenital heart defects: results of two case-control studies

We aimed to study the association between use of antihistamines in early pregnancy and congenital heart defects (CHD) in the offspring.

DESIGN

Two case-control studies.

SETTING

HAVEN study, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, and Eurocat Northern Netherlands (NNL), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. We studied 361 children with CHD and 410 controls without congenital malformations from the HAVEN study and replicated the analyses in 445 children with CHD and 530 controls from the Eurocat NNL registry. Information about antihistamine use in early pregnancy and potential confounders was obtained from questionnaires postpartum. We calculated the association between antihistamines and CHD risk by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the HAVEN study, 25 of 771 mothers used antihistamines that were associated with an increased CHD risk (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.3), particularly atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) (OR 5.1, 95 % CI 1.3-20.5) and perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pVSD) (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.8-14.4). Mothers with severe nausea who did not use antihistamines had a reduced risk (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.98), whereas nauseous mothers using antihistamines showed an almost fivefold increased risk of pVSD (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.1-21.8). The association between antihistamines and AVSD was confirmed in the Eurocat cohort (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8.7), but we could not replicate the association with overall CHD risk. We found a positive association between antihistamine use in early pregnancy and CHD risk, particularly AVSD, which seemed to be independent of nausea/vomiting.

First-trimester antihistamine exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion or preterm birth

PURPOSE

We tested whether antihistamine exposure during early pregnancy is associated with spontaneous abortion (SAB) or preterm birth (PTB).

METHODS

Women were enrolled in Right from the Start (2004-2010), a prospective pregnancy cohort. Data about first-trimester antihistamine use were obtained from screening and first-trimester interviews. Self-reported outcomes included SAB and PTB and were verified by medical records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for an association between antihistamine use and each outcome, both performed adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Among the 2685 pregnancies analyzed, 14% (n = 377) reported use of antihistamines. Among antihistamine users, 12% (n = 44) experienced SABs, and 6% (n = 21) had PTBs. Antihistamine exposure was not associated with SAB (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64, 1.21) or PTB, which was modified by maternal race (aHR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.61, 1.72 among White women and aHR = 0.43, 95%CI 0.14, 1.34 among Black women).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the biologic plausibility that antihistamine use may influence pregnancy outcomes, we did not detect evidence of an association with SAB or PTB. These data demonstrate the utility of large prospective cohorts for evaluating drug safety in pregnancy when concerns are raised from animal models.

Histamine improves antigen uptake and cross-presentation by dendritic cells

Previous studies have shown that histamine is able to modulate the function of dendritic cells (DCs). Histamine seems to be required for the normal differentiation of DCs. Moreover, it is capable of stimulating the chemotaxis of immature DCs and of promoting the differentiation of T CD4+ cells into a Th2 profile. In this study, we analyzed whether histamine was able to modulate endocytosis and cross-presentation mediated by immature DCs. Our results show that both functions are stimulated by histamine. Endocytosis of soluble HRP and FITC-OVA and cross-presentation of soluble OVA were markedly increased by histamine. Interestingly, stimulation of endocytosis and cross-presentation appeared to be mediated through different histamine receptors. In fact, the enhancement of endocytosis was prevented by the histamine2 receptor (H2R) antagonist cimetidine, whereas the stimulation of cross-presentation was prevented by the H3R/H4R antagonist thioperamide. Of note, contrasting with the observations made with soluble Ags, we found that histamine did not increase either the uptake of OVA-attached to latex beads, or the cross-presentation of OVA immobilized on latex beads. This suggests that the ability of histamine to increase endocytosis and cross-presentation is dependent on the Ag form and/or the mechanisms through which the Ag is internalized by DCs. Our results support that histamine may favor cross-presentation of soluble allergens by DCs enabling the activation of allergen-specific T CD8+ cells, which appears to play an important role in the development of allergic responses in the airway.