The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease

Risk of Complications After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pregnancy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested higher complication rates after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy.

AIMS

We performed a propensity-matched cohort analysis to assess the risk of ERCP-related complications among pregnant women in the United States.

METHODS

The TriNetX database was analyzed to identify pregnant and non-pregnant females between 18 and 50 years of age who underwent ERCP. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for age and race. Outcomes included risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, perforation within 7 days, and infections within 30 days of ERCP. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the risk of PEP based on indication for ERCP.

RESULTS

The risk of PEP was higher in the pregnant cohort compared to controls, 10.3% vs 6.08%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.61; p = 0.003. We found no difference in the risk of GI bleeding, perforation, and infections between the two cohorts. There was no difference in the risk of PEP in the pregnant cohort compared to controls who underwent ERCP for acute choledocholithiasis (4.2% vs 2.1%, aOR 1.98, 95% CI 0.97-4.03, p = 0.5) or ascending cholangitis (18.6% vs 14.7%, aOR 1.32, 95% CI 0.52-3.39, p = 0.55). There was no difference in the risk of PEP in the pregnant cohort after sensitivity analysis based on age, race, obesity, and indomethacin use.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant females are at an increased risk of PEP but not GI bleeding, perforation, and infections when compared to non-pregnant controls. Clinicians should be cautious when proceeding with ERCP during pregnancy.

Autoimmune pancreatitis with IgG-4 cholangiopathy in a pregnant woman: A case report

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis during pregnancy. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare and life-threatening condition with increased maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Autoimmune pancreatitis may result in a mass-forming lesion in the pancreas resembling pancreatic cancer; therefore, meticulous and careful investigations must be done to avoid misdiagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis as pancreatic cancer. Since autoimmune pancreatitis improves dramatically to steroid therapy, accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis can avoid unnecessary procedures, surgeries, and pancreatic resection. A case of a pregnant lady in her third trimester was presented with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. On examination, there was tenderness in both epigastric and right hypochondrium associated with elevated serum amylase, liver transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and immunoglobulin G4. Both abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed a pancreatic head lesion with dilation in both pancreatic duct and common bile duct. Steroid was initiated that resulted in rapid and dramatic responsiveness. Acute pancreatitis is uncommon during pregnancy, and autoimmune pancreatitis is a very rare form of acute pancreatitis; therefore, a clear and rapid assessment, diagnosis, and management plan are necessary to avoid maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Diagnostic value of HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN in infants with congenital biliary atresia

Hyaluronic acid (HA), type III procollagen III (PC-III), type IV collagen IV (IV-C), and laminin (LN) have certain diagnostic value for hepatobiliary diseases. No published studies have compared the diagnostic accuracy of these 4 indicators for the diagnosis of congenital biliary atresia (CBA) in infants. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN in infants with CBA. From January 2017 to December 2020, 185 infants with nonphysiological jaundice in the Second Department of General Surgery at the Children's Hospital of Hebei were enrolled in this study. Forty-six infants with CBA (CBA group) and 139 infants without CBA (noncongenital biliary atresia group) were diagnosed using ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative exploration, and intraoperative cholangiography. The levels of HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN in the 2 groups were statistically analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves and by calculating the area under the curve. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors. Compared to the noncongenital biliary atresia group, the levels of HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN were significantly increased in the CBA group (P <.05). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the optimal cutoff values for HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN were 162.7, 42.5, 199.7, and 101.2 ng/mL, and the area under the curves were 0.892, 0.762, 0.804, and 0.768, respectively. The sensitivity values for the diagnosis of CBA were 76.82%, 71.61%, 70.32%, and 72.28%, and the specificity values for the diagnosis of biliary atresia were 70.22%, 70.44%, 66.34%, and 68.71%, respectively. In the multivariate model, HA ≥162.7 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] = 5.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.15-8.37), PC-III ≥42.5 ng/mL (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 2.54-7.16), IV-C ≥199.7 ng/mL (OR = 5.02, 95% CI: 2.98-7.64), and LN ≥101.2 ng/mL (OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 2.41-10.07) remained associated with the occurrence of CBA. HA, PC-III, IV-C, and LN have high accuracy for the diagnosis of CBA in infants, and these factors are potential diagnostic biomarkers for CBA.

Gallstones in pregnancy

Gallstone disease is the most common gastrointestinal disease in developed countries and is present in up to 15% of the population. Owing to the increased risk factors for gallstones in pregnancy, it is the second most common non-obstetric emergency, affecting up to 12% of pregnant women with a risk of recurrence. Up to 3% of pregnant women in America require a cholecystectomy in the first year after delivery. Gallstone disease has a high risk of developing associated complications, and maternal mortality can be up to 37% if the patient develops gallstone pancreatitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholecystectomy can be performed safely in the second trimester when benefits outweigh the risks. However, if the patient is able to be managed conservatively, then a cholecystectomy should be performed in the postnatal period to avoid further recurrences and complications. Despite this, there is currently no national UK guidance on how to manage gallstones and related diseases during pregnancy.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Jaundice

Jaundice is the end result of myriad causes, which makes the role of imaging in this setting particularly challenging. In the United States, the most common causes of all types of jaundice fall into four categories including hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, blockage of the common bile duct by a gallstone or tumor, and toxic reaction to a drug or medicinal herb. Clinically, differentiating between the various potential etiologies of jaundice requires a detailed history, targeted physical examination, and pertinent laboratory studies, the results of which allow the physician to categorize the type of jaundice into mechanical or nonmechanical causes. Imaging modalities used to evaluate the jaundiced patient (all etiologies) include abdominal ultrasound (US), CT, MR cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic US. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Gallbladder and Biliary Disease in Pregnancy

Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tract are extremely common in developed nations. Because of the physiology of pregnancy, their incidence increases during gestation. This article represents a review of the existing literature on the entire spectrum of biliary disease. The physiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic evaluation of a variety of conditions are reviewed. Historical and contemporary data regarding pregnancy implications and treatment options are discussed.

Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography

AIM

To systematically review safety/efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed during pregnancy, considering fetal viability, fetal teratogenicity, premature delivery, and future postpartum development of the infant.

METHODS

Systematic computerized literature search performed using PubMed with the key words "ERCP" and "pregnancy". Two clinicians independently reviewed the literature, and decided on which articles to incorporate in this review based on consensus and preassigned priorities. Large clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and controlled trials were assigned higher priority than review articles or small clinical series, and individual case reports were assigned lowest priority. Dr. Cappell has formal training and considerable experience in conducting systematic reviews, with 4 published systematic reviews in peer-reviewed journals indexed in PubMed during the last 2 years, and with a PhD in neurophysiology that involved 5 years of training and research in biomedical statistics.

RESULTS

Advances in imaging modalities, including abdominal ultrasound, MRCP, and endoscopic ultrasound, have generally obviated the need for diagnostic ERCP in non-pregnant and pregnant patients. Clinical experience with performing ERCP during pregnancy is burgeoning, with > 500 cases of therapeutic ERCP reported in the literature, aside from a national registry study of 58 patients. These studies show that therapeutic ERCP has a very high rate of technical success in clearing the bile duct of gallstones, and has a relatively low and acceptable rate of maternal and fetal complications. The great majority of births after therapeutic ERCP are full-term, have normal birth weights, and are healthy. A recent trend is performing ERCP without radiation to eliminate radiation teratogenicity. Systematic literature review reveals 147 cases of ERCP without fluoroscopy in 8 clinical series. These studies demonstrate extremely high technical success in endoscopically removing choledocholithiasis, favorable maternal outcomes with rare maternal ERCP complications, and excellent fetal outcomes. ERCP without fluoroscopy generally confirms proper biliary cannulation by aspiration of yellow bile per sphincterotome or leakage of yellow bile around an inserted guide-wire.

CONCLUSION

This systematic literature review reveals ERCP is relatively safe and efficacious during pregnancy, with relatively favorable maternal and fetal outcomes after ERCP. Recommendations are provided about ERCP indications, special ERCP techniques during pregnancy, and prospects for future research.

Emergency general surgery in pregnancy

It is often that the acute care surgeon will be called on to evaluate the pregnant patient with abdominal pain. Most of the diagnostic and management decisions regarding pregnant patients will follow the usual tenets of surgery; however, there are important differences in the pregnant patient to be aware of to avoid pitfalls which can lead to complications for both mother and fetus. This review hopes to describe the most common emergencies facing the surgeon caring for the pregnant patient and the latest management options.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Abdominal and Pelvic Pain in the Pregnant Patient

The utility of MR imaging in evaluating abdominal and pelvic pain in the pregnant patient is discussed. Details regarding the indications, technical aspects, and imaging findings of various common abdominal and pelvic abnormalities in pregnancy are reviewed.

[Protection of the unborn child in diagnostic and interventional radiological procedures]

The radiation exposure of an unborn child should be principally avoided, whenever it is medically reasonably possible; therefore, the identification of pregnant patients is the first and the most important step in radiation protection of the unborn child. However, in cases of emergency saving the life of the patient has a higher priority than the radiation protection of the unborn child. In this review article, we present a longitudinal section through the national and international literature and guidelines as a basis for radiological management of a (possibly) pregnant patient. We also list some radiological procedures recommended in the literature for a series of maternal indications considering the contraindications of each method during pregnancy and radiation protection of the unborn child.

Magnetic resonance imaging of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy

Evaluation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists alike. The differential diagnosis includes obstetric and nonobstetric conditions unique to pregnancy, in addition to causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain unrelated to the pregnancy. The clinical presentation and course of disease may be altered in pregnancy, and several pathologies are exacerbated by pregnancy. Discriminating clinical features in the diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic pain are often confounded by expected anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy. Moreover, while diagnostic pathways may be altered in pregnancy, the necessity for a timely and accurate diagnosis must be underscored, as delay in treatment may result in an undesirable increase in morbidity and/or mortality for both the patient and fetus. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) through faster acquisition and motion-insensitive techniques, coupled with increased awareness and education regarding the value of MRI in diagnosing a wide range of pathology, have established MRI as a valuable strategy in the investigation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in the pregnant patient. This review presents a practical approach to common obstetric and nonobstetric causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain during pregnancy, as well as safety considerations for performing MRI in this patient population.

Acute acalculous cholecystitis determining Mirizzi syndrome: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Although Mirizzi syndrome is widely reported in literature, little is known about acute acalcholous cholecystitis determinig the findings of a Mirizzi syndrome.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of MRCP-confirmed Mirizzi syndrome in acute acalculous cholecystitis resolved by surgery.

CONCLUSION

Acute acalcholosus cholecystitis determinig a Mirizzi Syndrome should be included in the Mirizzi classification as a type 1. Thus it could be useful to divide the type 1 in two entity (compression by stone and compression by enlarged gallbladder). Magnetic Resonance should be considered the preferred diagnostic tool in any case of Mirizzi syndrome suspicious.

Non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy

Gallstone diseases are common during pregnancy. In most cases, patients are asymptomatic and do not require any treatment. However, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis may potentially become life-threatening for both mother and fetus and often require urgent intervention. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard technique for removing common bile duct stones, it is associated with ionizing radiation that could carry teratogenic risk. Non-radiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) is reported to be effective without incurring this risk. Two techniques have been described to confirm bile duct cannulation: bile aspiration and image guidance. With bile aspiration, biliary cannulation is confirmed by applying suction to the cannula to yield bile, thus confirming an intrabiliary position. Image guidance involves using ultrasound or direct visualization (choledochoscopy) to confirm selective biliary cannulation or duct clearance. Once cannulation is achieved, the stones are removed using standard ERCP techniques and tools. Case series and retrospective studies have reported success rates of up to 90% for NR-ERCP with complication rates similar to standard ERCP. Pregnancy outcomes are not adversely affected by NR-ERCP, but whether the avoidance of radiation carries benefit for the baby is unknown. Prospective comparative trials are lacking. NR-ERCP is technically demanding and should be attempted only by skilled biliary endoscopists in properly equipped and staffed health-care institutions, in a multidisciplinary setting.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the pregnant woman

About 20000 gastrointestinal endoscopies are performed annually in America in pregnant women. Gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy raises the critical issue of fetal safety in addition to patient safety. Endoscopic medications may be potentially abortifacient or teratogenic. Generally, Food and Drug Administration category B or C drugs should be used for endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) seems to be relatively safe for both mother and fetus based on two retrospective studies of 83 and 60 pregnant patients. The diagnostic yield is about 95% when EGD is performed for gastrointestinal bleeding. EGD indications during pregnancy include acute gastrointestinal bleeding, dysphagia > 1 wk, or endoscopic therapy. Therapeutic EGD is experimental due to scant data, but should be strongly considered for urgent indications such as active bleeding. One study of 48 sigmoidoscopies performed during pregnancy showed relatively favorable fetal outcomes, rare bad fetal outcomes, and bad outcomes linked to very sick mothers. Sigmoidoscopy should be strongly considered for strong indications, including significant acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic diarrhea, distal colonic stricture, suspected inflammatory bowel disease flare, and potential colonic malignancy. Data on colonoscopy during pregnancy are limited. One study of 20 pregnant patients showed rare poor fetal outcomes. Colonoscopy is generally experimental during pregnancy, but can be considered for strong indications: known colonic mass/stricture, active lower gastrointestinal bleeding, or colonoscopic therapy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) entails fetal risks from fetal radiation exposure. ERCP risks to mother and fetus appear to be acceptable when performed for ERCP therapy, as demonstrated by analysis of nearly 350 cases during pregnancy. Justifiable indications include symptomatic or complicated choledocholithiasis, manifested by jaundice, cholangitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or dilated choledochus. ERCP should be performed by an expert endoscopist, with informed consent about fetal radiation risks, minimizing fetal radiation exposure, and using an attending anesthesiologist. Endoscopy is likely most safe during the second trimester of pregnancy.

ACR appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain

Acute right upper quadrant pain is a common presenting symptom in patients with acute cholecystitis. When acute cholecystitis is suspected in patients with right upper quadrant pain, in most clinical scenarios, the initial imaging modality of choice is ultrasound. Although cholescintigraphy has been shown to have slightly higher sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis, ultrasound is preferred as the initial study for a variety of reasons, including greater availability, shorter examination time, lack of ionizing radiation, morphologic evaluation, confirmation of the presence or absence of gallstones, evaluation of bile ducts, and identification or exclusion of alternative diagnoses. CT or MRI may be helpful in equivocal cases and may identify complications of acute cholecystitis. When ultrasound findings are inconclusive, MRI is the preferred imaging test in pregnant patients who present with right upper quadrant pain. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 2, evidence-based review and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this article are to discuss the current evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism, appendicitis, urolithiasis, and cholelithiasis during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic imaging should be performed during pregnancy only with an understanding of the maternal and fetal risks and benefits, the comparative advantages of different modalities, and the unique anatomic and physiologic issues associated with pregnancy.

Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy

Although gastrointestinal endoscopy is generally safe, its safety must be separately analyzed during pregnancy with regard to fetal safety. Fetal risks from endoscopic medications are minimized by avoiding FDA category D drugs, minimizing endoscopic medications, and anesthesiologist attendance at endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy seems to be relatively safe for the fetus and may be performed when strongly indicated during pregnancy. Despite limited clinical data, endoscopic banding of esophageal varices and endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding seems justifiable during pregnancy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy during pregnancy also appears to be relatively safe for the fetus and may be performed when strongly indicated. Colonoscopy may be considered in pregnant patients during the second trimester if there is a strong indication. Data on colonoscopy during the other trimesters are limited. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography seems to be relatively safe during pregnancy and should be performed for strong indications (for example, complicated choledocholithiasis). Endoscopic safety precautions during pregnancy include the performance of endoscopy in hospital by an expert endoscopist and only when strongly indicated, deferral of endoscopy to the second trimester whenever possible, and obstetric consultation.