Evolutionary magnetic resonance appearance of renal cell carcinoma after percutaneous cryoablation

Assessment of Local Tumor Progression After Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Focal enhancement typically suggests local tumor progression (LTP) after renal cell carcinoma is percutaneously ablated. However, evaluating findings that are false positive or negative of LTP is less familiar to radiologists who have little experience with renal ablation. Various imaging features are encountered during and after thermal ablation. Ablation procedures and previous follow-up imaging should be reviewed before determining if there is LTP. Previous studies have focused on detecting the presence or absence of focal enhancement within the ablation zone. Therefore, various diagnostic pitfalls can be experienced using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examinations. This review aimed to assess how to read images during or after ablation procedures, recognize imaging features of LTP and determine factors that influence LTP.

Diffusion weighted imaging changes in extra-abdominal desmoid tumor after cryotherapy

Desmoid tumors (DT) are rare benign tumors with a local invasion potential and recurrence. It is characterized on histology by an abnormal fibroblastic proliferation in a collagenous stroma, in variable proportions leading to heterogeneity of the lesion signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Current guidelines propose watchful waiting but in case of progression or symptoms, cryotherapy may be a therapeutic option in its extra-abdominal form. Tumor recurrence is mostly detected based on post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although DWI sequence is the key-sequence for tumor detection in oncologic imaging, there are very few data in literature on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in DT generally and even fewer on DT after cryotherapy. DWI changes after cryotherapy may be confusing and suspicious of residual tumor or tumor recurrence when displaying low ADC values; thus knowledge of possible DWI patterns after cryotherapy of DT seem paramount. We found that the early changes of DT after cryotherapy are hyperintensity on DWI sequence with low ADC values (<1.00 × 10^-3mm²/s), without corresponding enhancement and a later decrease in signal of the treated lesion on DWI. The freezing-thawing cycles of cryotherapy turn DT into gelatinous necrosis with a slow resorption rate, as reported in the only few studies referring of changes of DWI signals after cryotherapy, which are on renal and prostate models. Hyperintensity on DWI with low ADC values may be seen in early MRI follow-up after cryotherapy of extra-abdominal DT, corresponding with tumor necrosis changes and should not be mistaken with recurrence.KEY MESSAGESMagnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice for desmoid tumor (DT) follow-up, mainly based on contrast uptake which make data on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) very rare.Cryotherapy is an accepted therapeutic option for DT that will lead to tumor necrosis.Hyperintensity on DWI with low apparent diffusion coefficient values is a possible expected early pattern on DWI after cryotherapy of DT.

Contrast enhancement early after renal malignancy cryoablation: imaging findings associated with benignity

OBJECTIVES

Contrast enhancement by MRI done early after cryoablation for renal malignancies may suggest residual tumor (RT). However, we have observed MRI enhancement within 48 h of cryoablation in patients who had no contrast enhancement 6 weeks later. Our purpose was to identify features of 48-h contrast enhancement in patients without RT.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation of renal malignancies in 2013-2020, exhibited cryoablation-zone MRI contrast enhancement 48 h later, and had available 6-week MRI scans. Persistent or growing CE at 6 weeks vs. 48 h was classified as RT. A washout index was calculated for each 48-h MRI, and its performance for predicting RT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients with 72 cryoablation procedures and 83 cryoablation zones exhibiting 48-h contrast enhancement; mean age was 66 ± 17 years. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma accounted for 95% of tumors. Of the 83 48-h enhancement zones, RT was observed in eight while 75 were benign. The 48-h enhancement was consistently visible at the arterial phase. Washout was significantly associated with RT (p < 0.001) and gradually increasing contrast enhancement with benignity (p < 0.009). A washout index below  - 1.1 predicted RT with 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity.

CONCLUSION

MRI contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies was usually benign. Washout was associated with residual tumor, with a washout index value below  - 1.1 exhibiting good performance in predicting residual tumor. These findings may help to guide decisions about repeat cryoablation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies rarely indicates residual tumor, which is characterized by washout with a washout index lower than  - 1.1.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast enhancement at the arterial phase of magnetic resonance imaging done 48 h after cryoablation of a renal malignancy is usually benign. • Residual tumor manifesting as contrast enhancement at the arterial phase is characterized by subsequent marked washout. • A washout index below  - 1.1 has 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity for residual tumor.

Role of MRI at 1- and 3-Month Follow-up in Predicting the Likelihood of Tumor Recurrence Following Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether ablation volume difference relatively to tumoral volume, minimal distance between ablation area and necrotic tumor, or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within the ablation area, measured on 1- and 3-month follow-up MRI following cryoablation of renal tumors, are associated with tumor recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

136 renal tumors were retrospectively identified. Patients, tumor characteristics and follow-up MRI (1-, 3-, 6-month, and thereafter annually) were collected. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between the investigated parameters and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Over the follow-up period (27.7 ± 21.9 months), 13 recurrences were identified at 20.5 ± 19.4 months. At 1- and 3-month, the mean volume difference between the ablation zone and the tumor volume were + 577.5 ± 511.3% vs + 251.4 ± 209.8% (p = 0.003), and + 268.8 ± 291.1% vs + 103.8 ± 94.6% (p = 0.023) in patients without and with tumor recurrence, respectively. At 1- and 3-month, the minimum distance between the necrotic tumor and the edge of the ablation area was 3.4 ± 2.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.9 mm (p = 0.019), and 2.4 ± 2.3 vs 1.4 ± 1.8 mm (p = 0.13) in patients without and with tumor recurrence, respectively. Analysis of ADC values was not associated with tumor recurrence. After performing the multivariate analysis, only volume difference of the ablation area compared to tumor volume was associated with absence of tumor recurrence at 1- (OR = 14.1; p = 0.001) and 3-month (OR = 8.2; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of volume difference between the ablation area and tumor volume on early (≤ 3 months) MRI follow-up identifies patients at risk of tumor recurrence.

Time-course changes in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging following focal cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Initial experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the time-course changes of multiparametric MRI findings following focal cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who underwent focal cryotherapy as an initial curative treatment for localized prostate cancer during March 2017-April 2021 were included. Before the treatment, the patients underwent targeted prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion. Overall, 64 MRIs were conducted after focal cryotherapy and the temporal post-treatment MR signal changes of the ablated area in T2WI, T1WI, DWI, and DCE-MRI were analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients. The median follow-up period was 22 months. The initial post-treatment MRI revealed significant signal changes in the target lesions for all patients, including the disappearance of findings suggestive of cancer. At 3 months post-treatment, most lesions were hyperintense with a hypointense rim on T2WI, T1WI, and DWI (83.3 %). After 6 months, hyperintensity reduced, and after 17 months, all lesions showed hypointensity in these sequences. DCE-MRI of most patients showed loss of internal enhancement; however, one patient exhibited residual nodular enhancement in the ablated area at 3 months, which disappeared after 6 months. Peripheral enhancement was common at 3 months, disappearing after 23 months. Two patients showed biopsy-evidenced local recurrence. The recurrent lesions showed hypointensity on T2WI with diffusion restriction and early contrast enhancement in the ventral transition zone.

CONCLUSION

MRI findings of the ablated sites following focal cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer show dynamic signal changes, especially within the first 6 months.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up and Active Surveillance of Clinically Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2021 Update

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most malignant renal tumors and is considered the most lethal of all urologic cancers. For follow-up of patients with treated or untreated RCC and those with neoplasms suspected to represent RCC, radiologic imaging is the most valuable component of surveillance, as most relapses and cases of disease progression are identified when patients are asymptomatic. Understanding the strengths and limitations of the various imaging modalities for the detection of disease, recurrence, or progression is essential when planning follow-up regimens. This document addresses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients who have been treated for RCC with radical or partial nephrectomy or ablative therapies. It also discusses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients with localized biopsy-proven or suspected RCC undergoing active surveillance. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Cross-sectional imaging assessment of renal masses with emphasis on MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful complementary imaging tool for the diagnosis and characterization of renal masses, as it provides both morphologic and functional information. A core MRI protocol for renal imaging should include a T1-weighted sequence with in- and opposed-phase images (or, alternatively with DIXON technique), T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images as well as a dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence with subtraction images, followed by a delayed post-contrast T1-weighted sequence. The main advantages of MRI over computed tomography include increased sensitivity for contrast enhancement, less sensitivity for detection of calcifications, absence of pseudoenhancement, and lack of radiation exposure. MRI may be applied for renal cystic lesion characterization, differentiation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign solid renal tumors, RCC histologic grading, staging, post-treatment follow-up, and active surveillance of patients with treated or untreated RCC.

Role of Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

With the expansion in cross-sectional imaging over the past few decades, there has been an increase in the number of incidentally detected renal masses and an increase in the incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The complete characterization of an indeterminate renal mass on CT or MR images is challenging, and the authors provide a critical review of the best imaging methods and essential, important, and optional reporting elements used to describe the indeterminate renal mass. While surgical staging remains the standard of care for RCC, the role of renal mass CT or MRI in staging RCC is reviewed, specifically with reference to areas that may be overlooked at imaging such as detection of invasion through the renal capsule or perirenal (Gerota) fascia. Treatment options for localized RCC are expanding, and a multidisciplinary group of experts presents an overview of the role of advanced medical imaging in surgery, percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization, active surveillance, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Finally, the arsenal of treatments for advanced renal cancer continues to grow to improve response to therapy while limiting treatment side effects. Imaging findings are important in deciding the best treatment options and to monitor response to therapy. However, evaluating response has increased in complexity. The unique imaging findings associated with antiangiogenic targeted therapy and immunotherapy are discussed. An invited commentary by Remer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

The role of imaging in the management of renal masses

The wide availability of cross-sectional imaging is responsible for the increased detection of small, usually asymptomatic renal masses. More than 50 % of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent incidental findings on noninvasive imaging. Multimodality imaging, including conventional US, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is pivotal in diagnosing and characterizing a renal mass, but also provides information regarding its prognosis, therapeutic management, and follow-up. In this review, imaging data for renal masses that urologists need for accurate treatment planning will be discussed. The role of US, CEUS, CT and mpMRI in the detection and characterization of renal masses, RCC staging and follow-up of surgically treated or untreated localized RCC will be presented. The role of percutaneous image-guided ablation in the management of RCC will be also reviewed.

Percutaneous Renal Ablation

Incidental small renal cell cancers are increasingly being diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging. This review article describes the indications for percutaneous ablation of small renal cell cancers, choice of ablation technologies and imaging follow-up.

Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging

The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in recent decades necessitates careful consideration of additional treatment options, especially for patients who may be poor surgical candidates. An emerging body of evidence suggests that ablation may be performed effectively and safely even in patients with multiple comorbidities. Accordingly, clinical guidelines now include thermal ablation as an alternative for such patients with localized tumors that are 4.0 cm or smaller. Recent experience with these minimally invasive techniques has led to a greater understanding of the imaging findings that merit close attention when ablation is anticipated, or after it is performed. These imaging findings may guide the interventionalist's perception of the risks, technical challenges, and likelihood of treatment success associated with RCC ablation. The present review provides an overview of clinically relevant radiologic findings during the preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural period in the context of image-guided renal ablation. Keywords: Interventional-Body, Kidney, Percutaneous, Urinary © RSNA, 2019.

Imaging of Small Renal Masses before and after Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation of small renal masses is increasingly accepted as an alternative to partial nephrectomy, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. Many professional societies support this alternate treatment with updated guidelines. Before performing thermal ablation, it is important to stratify risk and assess technical feasibility by evaluating tumor imaging features such as size, location, and centrality. Routine postablation imaging with CT or MRI is necessary for assessment of residual or recurrent tumor, evidence of complications, or new renal masses outside the ablation zone. The normal spectrum and evolution of findings at CT and MRI include a halo appearance of the ablation zone, ablation zone contraction, and ablation zone calcifications. Tumor recurrence frequently manifests at CT or MRI as new nodular enhancement at the periphery of an expanding ablation zone, although it is normal for the ablation zone to enlarge within the first few months. Recognizing early tumor recurrence is important, as small renal masses are often easily treated with repeat ablations. Potential complications of thermal ablation include vascular injury, urine leak, ureteral stricture, nerve injury, and bowel perforation. The risk of these complications may be related to tumor size and location.^©RSNA, 2019.

Recurrent renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy and ablation therapy: Radiology perspective

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignancy, accounting for approximately 2% of adult malignancies and 4% of new cancer cases in the United States every year. Imaging guided ablative therapy, including radiofrequency (RF) ablation, cryotherapy and microwave has gained popularity over the last decade in treatment of small tumors. Antiangiogenic therapy has set itself to be the standard of care for many patients with metastasis these days. With hope for more research, survival rates of metastatic RCC may increase from a current 2-year survival rate of approximately 20%. Variation in imaging surveillance protocol in terms of frequency, modality, and duration is noted among guidelines developed by several organizations. In this review article, we will discuss follow-up imaging protocols, patterns of RCC recurrence following different modalities of treatment, imaging appearance, as well as usual and unusual sites of metastatic disease.

[Ablative therapy in urology: Good practice and perspective]

INTRODUCTION

To expose the main point of discussion from present ablative therapies' guidelines and propose global perspectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com/) using different associations of keywords "ablative therapy" ; "prostate cancer"; "kidney cancer"; "guidelines"; "hybrid operating room". Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Present guidelines on ablative therapies in urology are, considering authors and organs, either particularly prudent (EAU guidelines for prostate and kidney) or relatively optimistic (CIRSE guidelines). This discrepancy is related to a low level of proof. So, a new approach is mandatory: more homogeneous in methodology, and especially more open to a new organization sparing economic efficiency. The objective will be to get multifunctional and multidisciplinaries platforms, in facts and in minds. It will induce, in the future, a deep reflection about training and boundaries' specialties.

CONCLUSION

Ablative therapies represent a crucial stake for urology and a clear example of medicosurgical evolution in future, based on new technologies (energy, robotic, imaging). A serious and deep reflection is necessary to prepare it and be deeply involved in.

[Percutaneous renal ablation: Pre-, per-, post-interventional evaluation modalities and adapted management]

OBJECTIVES

Ablative treatment (AT) rise is foreseen, validation of steps to insure good proceedings is needed. By looking over the process of the patient, this study evaluates the requirements and choices needed in every step of the management.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Explanations of AT proposal rather than partial nephrectomy or surveillance have to be discussed in a consultation shared by urologist and interventional radiologist. Per-procedure choices depend on predictable ballistic difficulties. High volume, proximity of the hilum or of a risky organ are in favor of general anesthesia, cryotherapy and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Percutaneous approach should be privileged, as it seems as effective as the laparoscopic approach. Early and delayed complications have to be treated both by urologist and radiologist. Surveillance by CT/MRI insure of the lack of contrast-enhanced in the treated area. Patients and tumors criteria, in case of incomplete treatment or recurrence, are the key of the appropriate treatment: surgery, second session of AT, surveillance.

CONCLUSION

AT treatments require patient's comprehension, excellent coordination of the partnership between urologist and radiologist and relevant choices during intervention.