Effect of traction on wrist joint space and cartilage visibility with and without MR arthrography

Posttreatment Imaging of the Wrist and Hand: Update 2022

Common indications for surgical procedures of the wrist and hand include acute fractures or fracture-dislocations; nonunited fractures; posttraumatic, degenerative, and inflammatory arthritides and tendinopathies; injuries to tendons, ligaments, and the triangular fibrocartilage complex; and entrapment neuropathies. Soft tissue or osseous infections or masses may also need surgical treatment. Several of these procedures require surgical hardware placement, and most entail clinical follow-up with periodic imaging. Radiography should be the first imaging modality in the evaluation of the postoperative wrist and hand. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, diagnostic ultrasonography, and occasionally nuclear medicine studies may be performed to diagnose or better characterize suspected postoperative complications. To provide adequate evaluation of postoperative imaging of the wrist and hand, the interpreting radiologist must be familiar with the basic principles of these surgical procedures and both the imaging appearance of normal postoperative findings as well as the potential complications.

Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Axial Traction of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint on Articular Cartilage Visibility: A Feasibility Study

Objectives

The objective of this study was to verify the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with axial traction of the thumb for observing articular cartilage.

Materials and methods

Eleven healthy adult volunteers (39.7 ± 7.4 years) without thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis or trauma were included in this study. A 3-tesla (3T) MRI (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthineers AG, Munich, Germany) of the right thumb with axial traction applied by a finger trap with three traction weights (0, 2, and 5 kg) was performed. A 3D T2* multiecho data imaging combination (MEDIC) was selected to visualize the articular cartilage. After multiplanar reconstruction, sagittal and coronal images of the thumb carpometacarpal joint were used to evaluate the articular cartilage visibility and joint space widths at five locations. Articular cartilage visibility was evaluated using our original classification method that used the percentage of the cartilage detectable area. The Friedman test was used to compare the differences between each traction weight and location.

Results

Articular cartilage visibility significantly improved with axial traction. The average joint space widths with the 5-kg application were 1.9 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 0.6, 2.0 ± 0.9, 3.9 ± 1.1, and 2.5 ± 1.4 mm at the center, volar edge, dorsal edge, radial edge, and ulnar edge, respectively. The joint space widths significantly increased proportionally with the traction weight at all locations. The joint space widths at the volar and radial edges were significantly greater than those at other locations.

Conclusion

Applying axial traction to the thumb increased the joint space widths and improved the visibility of the articular cartilage in the carpometacarpal joint on MRI.

Efficacy of non-bridging external fixation in treating distal radius fractures

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of non‐bridging external fixation in treating distal radius fractures (DRF) and its effect on wrist joint function.

Methods

The medical records of 207 patients who were treated for DRF between May 2008 and April 2017 in our hospital (age, 18.0–70.0 years; 99 males and 108 females) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had evident wrist trauma and the diagnosis of DRF was confirmed by imaging tests. A total of 101 patients received bridging external fixation (control group), whereas another 106 received non‐bridging external fixation (study group). At 12 weeks after the procedure, the treatment effect was measured using the Dienst scoring system (rating scale: ≤3 points, excellent; 4–7 points, good; 8–11 points, fair; >12 points, poor), and the wrist joint function was evaluated by Gartland and Werley classification (rating scale: 0–2 points, excellent; 3–8 points, good; 9–20 points, fair; >21 points, poor); meanwhile, the radial length, radial inclination, and palmar tilt were examined by X‐ray. Follow‐up visits were conducted once every 2 weeks for 6 months, and the incidences of complications in the two groups within 6 months after operation were recorded, including incision infection, Kirschner wire loosening, delayed fracture healing, and arthritis.

Results

There were no differences in the sex ratio, mean age, mean injury period, Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen classification, and cause of fracture between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In terms of the treatment effects, the study group had a higher percentage of excellent results (P < 0.001) and lower percentages of fair and poor results (P = 0.002, P = 0.001) than the control group 12 weeks after treatment, while both groups had similar percentages of good results (P = 0.109). In terms of the score of the wrist joint function, the study group had a higher proportion of excellent result than the control group 12 weeks after treatment (P = 0.029), whereas no intergroup differences in the proportion of good, fair, and poor results were observed (all P > 0.05). After follow‐up for 6 months, the incidences of incision infection, Kirschner wire loosening, delayed fracture healing, and arthritis, as well as the total complication rate were found to be similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Using non‐bridging external fixation for treating DRF allows some level of wrist movement during the early stage of fixation, effectively maintains the radial length, radial inclination, and palmar tilt, and achieves better outcomes than bridging external fixation.

[MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : Indications and implementation]

BACKGROUND

The imaging of chondral pathologies is an essential part in the work-up of acute and chronic joint diseases. Besides conventional MR imaging, CT and MR arthrography are well-established methods in evaluating articular cartilage. The application of these techniques requires knowledge of indications and safe injection procedures by the performing radiologist.

PURPOSE

Our goal is to describe the techniques of cross-sectional arthrographies of different joints, give an overview of general and joint-specific considerations for practical application as well as provide typical indications for cartilage imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective PubMed literature search concerning "arthrography", "CT arthrography", "MR arthrography", "arthrography cartilage", "arthrography wrist", "arthrography elbow", "arthrography shoulder", "arthrography hip", "arthrography knee", "arthrography ankle", "arthrography complications", "arthrography imaging guidance" "osteochondral lesion", "cartilage imaging" and "cartilage lesion" was performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CT and MR arthrography are valuable and safe tools in cartilage imaging. They are useful to verify and specify chondral pathologies, usually after conventional MR imaging, and have an important role in evaluating the stability and therefore in therapeutic decision making of osteochondral lesions. CT arthrography is not only a substitute technique in case of MR contraindications, it can be advantageous in small joints (wrist, elbow, ankle) compared to MR arthrography due to its higher image resolution. Fluoroscopic guided joint puncture is still the most commonly used image guidance method, but the role of ultrasound is steadily increasing. Joint traction in MR arthrography is a promising technique to improve cartilage visualization, though it is not yet used in clinical routine imaging.

[Update cartilage imaging of the small joints : Focus on high-field MRI]

BACKGROUND

Cartilage imaging of small joints is increasingly of interest, as early detection of cartilage damage may be relevant regarding individualized surgical therapies and long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to explain modern cartilage imaging of small joints with emphasis on MRI and to discuss the role of methods such as CT arthrography as well as compositional and high-field MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed literature search was performed for the years 2008-2018.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant cartilage imaging to detect chondral damage in small joints remains challenging. Conventional MRI at 3 T can still be considered as a reference for cartilage imaging in clinical routine. In terms of sensitivity, MR arthrography (MR-A) and computed tomography arthrography (CT-A) are superior to non-arthrographic MRI at 1.5 T in the detection of chondral damage. Advanced degenerative changes of the fingers and toes are usually sufficiently characterized by conventional radiography. MRI at field strengths of 3 T and ultrahigh-field imaging at 7 T can provide additional quantifiable, functional and metabolic information.

CONCLUSION

Standardized cartilage imaging plays an important role in clinical diagnostics in the ankle joint due to the availability of different and individualized therapeutic concepts. In contrast, cartilage imaging of other small joints as commonly performed in clinical studies has not yet become standard of care in daily clinical routine. Although individual study results are promising, additional studies with large patient collectives are needed to validate these techniques. With rapid development of new treatment concepts radiological diagnostics will play a more significant role in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions of small joints.