No differences in radiological changes after 3D conformal vs VMAT-based stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Treating early-stage centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer with DCAT-SBRT in centers lacking the VMAT technique: a comprehensive study

Background

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may have the highest overall performance for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of inoperable early-stage NSCLC. However, in centers lacking the VMAT technique, the dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) technique is potentially the best option for small and rounded NSCLC-SBRT. Therefore, we will comprehensively analyze the advantages of the DCAT versus the other techniques except VMAT in terms of dosimetry, plan complexity, delivery time, γ-passing rates and the interplay effect.

Methods

36 patients with early-stage centrally located NSCLC with PTV volumes < 65 cc were enrolled. All patients were redesigned with 50Gy/5f, and 100% of the prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of the PTV. The other two delivery techniques compared to the DCAT technique include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which use the same parameters for all three techniques.

Results

The dosimetric parameters of the 3-group plans all met the RTOG 0813 protocol. Unsurprisingly, plan complexity parameters such as segments and MUs were significantly reduced in the DCAT plans by 159.56 and 925.90 compared to the IMRT plans, respectively (all P < 0.001). The delivery time of the DCAT plans was the least of 164.51 s (all P < 0.05). Compared to the IMRT plans, the γ-passing rates were higher in the DCAT plans (P < 0.001), with the most significant difference of 6.01% in the (2%, 1 mm) criteria. As for the interplay effect, the mean dose difference (MDD) in the DCAT plans was as good as the 3DCRT plans at different respiratory amplitudes but better than the IMRT plans (all P < 0.05), and the MDD of DCAT plans did not exceed 3% in all respiratory amplitude.

Conclusion

In centers lacking the VMAT technique, implementing SBRT treatment based on the DCAT technique for inoperable early-stage centrally-located NSCLC patients with PTV volumes < 65 cc achieves better treatment efficiency and delivery accuracy while maintaining the plan quality.

Impact of Maximum Point Dose Within the Planning Target Volume on Local Control of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the maximum dose delivered to the planning target volume (PTV) in the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer. We investigated whether higher biologically effective doses (BED) within the PTV were associated with improved tumor control.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with early-stage, node-negative nonsmall cell lung cancer who received curative-intent SBRT between 2005 and 2018. We calculated the maximum BED (maxBED) within the PTV for all patients, analyzing outcomes using the cumulative incidence method and Fine-Gray test statistics to assess prognostic impact.

RESULTS

We analyzed 171 patients (median age, 70.2; range, 43 to 90 y) with 181 lung nodules. Median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 0.1 to 12 y) for all patients and 4.2 years (range, 0.2 to 8.4 y) for living patients. Median maximum tumor diameter was 1.9 cm (range, 0.7 to 5.6 cm). Patients received a prescription of 48 or 50 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions, respectively, except for one who received 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Median maxBED was 120 Gy (range, 101 to 171 Gy). There was no difference in the 3-year local control (LC) rate among patients treated with a maxBED<120 Gy versus ≥120 Gy ( P =0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in LC were observed between patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with SBRT in 4 or 5 fractions with a maxBED≥120 Gy. However, a higher maxBED trended toward improved LC rates, suggesting a maxBED threshold greater than 120 Gy may be needed to improve LC rates.

Factors associated with cavity formation after stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral early-stage lung cancer

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to identify the factors associated with cavity formation after SBRT in peripheral early-stage lung cancer patients. We analyzed the occurrence of cavity changes after SBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 99 cases with T1-T2aN0 peripheral non-small cell lung cancer treated with SBRT from 2004 to 2021. Patients underwent respiratory function tests, including diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco), before treatment. The median observation period was 35 months (IQR 18-47.5 months). Treatment involved fixed multi-portal irradiation in 67% of cases and VMAT in 33%. The total radiation doses ranged from 42 to 55 Gy, delivered over 4 to 5 fractions.

RESULTS

Cavity formation occurred in 14 cases (14.1%), appearing a median of 8 months after SBRT. The cavity disappeared in a median of 4 months after formation. High DLco and total radiation dose were identified as factors significantly associated with cavity formation. There have been no confirmed recurrences to date, but one patient developed a lung abscess.

CONCLUSION

Although cavity formation after SBRT for peripheral early-stage lung cancer is infrequent, it can occur. This study showed high DLco and total radiation dose to be factors significantly associated with cavity formation. These findings can be applied to optimizing radiation therapy (RT) and improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the optimal radiation dose for patients with near-normal DLco for whom surgery is an option. This study provides valuable insights into image changes after RT.

Planning issues on linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy

This work aims to summarize and evaluate the current planning progress based on the linear accelerator in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The specific techniques include 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, dynamic conformal arc therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). They are all designed to deliver higher doses to the target volume while reducing damage to normal tissues; among them, VMAT shows better prospects for application. This paper reviews and summarizes several issues on the planning of SRT to provide a reference for clinical application.

A case report of long-term successful stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation in a cardiac contractility modulation device carrier with giant left atrium, including a detailed dosimetric analysis

Introduction

Catheter ablation (CA) is the current standard of care for patients suffering drug-refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MMVTs). Yet, despite significant technological improvements, recurrences remain common, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly being adopted to overcome the limitations of conventional CA, but its safety and efficacy are still under evaluation.

Case presentation

We hereby present the case of a 73-year-old patient implanted with a mitral valve prosthesis, a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator, and a cardiac contractility modulation device, who was successfully treated with STAR for recurrent drug and CA-resistant MMVT in the setting of advanced heart failure and a giant left atrium. We report a 2-year follow-up and a detailed dosimetric analysis.

Conclusion

Our case report supports the early as well as the long-term efficacy of 25 Gy single-session STAR. Despite the concomitant severe heart failure, with an overall heart minus planned target volume mean dosage below 5 Gy, no major detrimental cardiac side effects were detected. To the best of our knowledge, our dosimetric analysis is the most accurate reported so far in the setting of STAR, particularly for what concerns cardiac substructures and coronary arteries. A shared dosimetric planning among centers performing STAR will be crucial in the next future to fully disclose its safety profile.

Role of Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Non-Oncogene Addicted NSCLC

Local ablative therapy (LAT), intended as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, is a well-recognized effective treatment for selected patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. Current clinical evidence supports LAT alone or in combination with systemic therapies. Our retrospective mono-institutional study aims to assess the role of LAT with a peculiar focus on the largest series of non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients to date. We included in this analysis all patients with the mentioned disease characteristics who underwent LAT for intracranial and/or extracranial metastases between 2011 and 2020. The main endpoints were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the whole population and after stratification for prognostic factors. We identified a series of 245 consecutive patients (314 lesions), included in this analysis (median age 69 years). In 77% of patients, a single metastasis was treated with LAT and intracranial involvement was the most frequent indication (53% of patients) in our series. The overall response rate (ORR) after LAT was 95%. In case of disease progression, 66 patients underwent new local treatments with curative intent. With a median follow-up of 18 months, median PFS was 13 months (1-year PFS 50%) and median OS was 32 months (1-year OS 75%). The median LC was not reached (1-year LC 89%). The presence of brain metastases was the only factor that negatively affected all clinical endpoints, with a 1-year LC, PFS and OS of 82%, 29% and 62% respectively, compared to 95%, 73% and 91%, respectively, for patients without BMs (p < 0.001 for each endpoint). At the multivariate analysis, mediastinal nodal involvement at baseline (p = 0.049), ECOG PS = 1 (p = 0.011), intracranial disease involvement (p = 0.001), administration of chemotherapy in combination with LAT (p = 0.020), and no delivery of further local treatment for progression or delivery of focal treatment for intracranial progression (p < 0.001) were related to a poorer OS. In our retrospective series, which is to our knowledge the largest to date, LAT showed encouraging results and confirmed the safety and effectiveness of focal treatments in non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients.

Impact of tumor size and location on lung dose difference between stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To evaluate the lung dose differences between three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the correlations with tumor characteristics, such as size and location.

Methods

Dosimetric comparisons between the two SBRT techniques in high‐ and low‐ to intermediate‐dose regions were retrospectively performed using four planning indices and lung‐dose parameters in 31 lung tumors. The magnitude of differences in these parameters was analyzed with relation to the planning target volume (PTV) and location‐related parameters.

Results

The absolute differences between the two techniques in lung‐dose parameters were small in both ipsilateral and bilateral lungs. The dosimetric differences were mainly correlated with the PTV rather than location‐related parameters, with positive and negative correlations with the high‐dose and intermediate‐dose parameters, respectively. The distances from the ipsilateral lung centroid to the PTV center were not correlated with the differences in any of the lung‐dose parameters. Additionally, the negative correlations with the MLD and V20 differences disappeared after applying a more rapid dose fall‐off in the IMRT plans for tumors with small PTVs of ≤15 cc.

Conclusions

Lung dose differences between the 3D‐CRT and IMRT techniques for lung SBRT were mainly correlated with the PTV rather than location‐related parameters. Together with the dosimetric benefit in high‐dose lung regions of IMRT for larger tumors, the relative increases in the MLD and V20 for small‐sized tumors could be reduced by applying a more rapid dose fall‐off outside the PTV.

Safety of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The prevalence of patients with a cardiac implantable device (CIED) developing cancer and requiring a course of radiotherapy (RT) is increasing remarkably. Previously published reports agree that standard and conventionally fractionated RT is usually safe for CIEDs, but no "in-vivo" reports are available on the potential effects of thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) regimens to CIEDs functioning. The purpose of our study is therefore to evaluate the effects of SABR on CIEDs (pacemakers [PM] or implantable cardiac defibrillators [ICD]) in a cohort of patients affected by primary or metastatic lung lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected all CIED-bearing patients undergoing SABR between 2007 and 2019 at our Institution. All CIEDs were interrogated before and after the SABR course to check for any malfunction. Prescription dose, beam energy and maximum dose (Dmax) to CIEDs were retrieved for each patient. Electrical records of the CIEDs were reviewed by the medical records.

RESULTS

Thirty-four consecutive patients (24 with a PM and 10 with an ICD), who underwent 38 separate SABR courses, were included in the study. Eight patients (24%) were PM-dependent. Prescription dose of SABR ranged 26-60 Gy in 1-8 fractions, with a photon energy ranging 6-to-10 MV (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and a median Dmax to CIEDs of 0.17 Gy (range 0.04-1.97 Gy). Electrical parameters were stable in post-treatment device programming visits and no transient or persistent alteration of the CIED function was recorded in any patient. No inappropriate interventions were recorded in the 10 ICD-bearing patients during the treatment fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic SABR proved to be safe for CIEDs when the dose is kept <2 Gy and the beam energy is ≤10 MV, irrespective of the pacing-dependency and of the CIED type.

Dosimetric Evaluation of Simplified Knowledge-Based Plan with an Extensive Stepping Validation Approach in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy-Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the performance of the simplified knowledge-based plans (KBPs) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 50 cases who underwent SBRT, only three structures were registered into knowledge-based model: total lung, spinal cord, and planning target volume. We performed single auto-optimization on VMAT plans in two steps: 19 cases used for the model training (closed-loop validation) and 16 new cases outside of training set (open-loop validation) for TrueBeam (TB) and Halcyon (Hal) linacs. The dosimetric parameters were compared between clinical plans (CLPs) and KBPs: CLPclosed, KBPclosed-TB and KBPclosed-Hal in closed-loop validation, CLPopen, KBPopen-TB and KBPopen-Hal in open-loop validation.

RESULTS

All organs at risk were comparable between CLPs and KBPs except for contralateral lung: V5 of KBPs was approximately 3%-7% higher than that of CLPs. V20 of total lung for KBPs showed comparable to CLPs; CLPclosed vs. KBPclosed-TB and CLPclosed vs. KBPclosed-Hal: 4.36% ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.95% and 4.36 ± 2.87% vs. 3.54% ± 1.94% (P = 0.54 and 0.54); CLPopen vs. KBPopen-TB and CLPopen vs. KBPopen-Hal: 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.55% ± 1.27% and 4.18% ± 1.57% vs. 3.67% ± 1.26% (P = 0.19 and 0.27). CI95 of KBPs with both linacs was superior to that of the CLP in closed-loop validation: CLPclosed vs. KBPclosed-TB vs. KBPclosed-Hal: 1.32% ± 0.12% vs. 1.18% ± 0.09% vs. 1.17% ± 0.06% (P < 0.01); and open-loop validation: CLPopen vs. KBPopen-TB vs. KBPopen-Hal: 1.22% ± 0.09% vs. 1.14% ± 0.04% vs. 1.16% ± 0.05% (P ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified KBPs with limited number of structures and without planner intervention were clinically acceptable in the dosimetric parameters for lung VMAT-SBRT planning.

Outcomes Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated Therapy versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

The treatment techniques used for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer continue to evolve. In this study, clinical outcomes following SBRT were evaluated according to the use of either 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Patients and methods

Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease control and survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Dosimetric analyses for target dose heterogeneity and coverage were performed.

Results

A total of 297 patients with 351 lesions were included. 3DCRT was used in 52% and IMRT in 48%. IMRT was utilized at a higher rate in more recent years. The most common regimens were 48 Gy in 4 fractions and 54-60 Gy in 3 fractions. With a median follow up of 22.7 months, there were 17 local failures for a crude relapse rate of 5.7%. Local failure did not differ in patients treated with 3DCRT and IMRT (4.9% vs 6.5%, p=0.573). Mean dose to gross tumor volume (GTV) as a percent of prescription dose was higher with 3DCRT compared with IMRT (107.7% vs 103.6%, p < 0.0001). Tumor stage, histology, and SBRT regimen did not correlate with local tumor control. Overall survival for the entire population approximated 72% at 2 years. Treatment was well tolerated with 6 documented grade 3+ events.

Conclusion

In this single-institution cohort of SBRT for early-stage NSCLC, there was no discernible difference in clinical outcomes between those treated with 3DCRT and IMRT.