Re-exposure in cone beam CT of the dentomaxillofacial region: a retrospective study

Repetition Rate of Scanning Due to Motion Artefacts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Retrospective Study

Objectives

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence of repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts in a Turkish subpopulation.

Material and Methods

A total of 6364 patients' cone-beam computed tomography data were analysed retrospectively to identify repeated scans due to motion artefacts. Patients were divided into eight age groups: 1) < 10-year-olds, 2) 10 to 19-year-olds, 3) 20 to 29-year-olds, 4) 30 to 39-year-olds, 5) 40 to 49-year-olds, 6) 50 to 59-year-olds, 7) 60 to 69-year-olds, and 8) > 70 year-olds. Chi-square test was applied to evaluate the repetition rate of scans by age and gender groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Repeated scans due to motion artefacts were observed in 1.96% of the patients. The repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in males than in females (P = 0.006). Furthermore, the repetition rate of scans was significantly higher in patients < 10 years old compared to the other age groups. However, there was no significant difference in the repetition rate of scans due to motion artefacts among the other age groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that patient age and gender are associated with repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans due to motion artefacts. Males and children under the age of 10 had more common repeated scans due to motion artefacts.

Evaluation of the dosimetry and centralization of scout-view function in CBCT

This study evaluated the centralization of the region of interest (ROI) in acquisition of the CBCT images, when the freely positionable scout-view (SV) function is applied. Additionally, the dosimetry of the acquired images was assessed in the SV function alone as well as in complete tomographic image in two different fields of view (FOV) (50x50 and 78x150mm). A three-location device was created to accommodate the dosimeters and the specimens, in the right, middle and left location during image acquisition. For dose assessment, thermoluminescent dosimeters were irradiated within the FOV and analyzed in a portable reader. For ROI evaluation, three specimens of gutta-percha stick were placed on the same device and the CT scans were acquired (CBCT OP 300 Maxio device, 90kV, 13mA, 85 µm voxel size, FOV of 50X50mm), with and without the SV, in three positions (3-9, 1-7 and 5-11 o’clock), simulating different regions of the mouth. Two image evaluations were performed, an objective and subjective. There was a slight percentage increase (1.36% to 1.40%) of the radiation dose with the use of SV. The distances were significantly greater in the images acquired without SV (p < 0.05). Every image obtained with SV was classified as being at the FOV’s center. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that SVs function is effective to centralize the ROI in the FOV, increasing the scan precision and avoiding repetitions due to positioning errors.

Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review

This report surveyed the image reject rates of intra-oral, extra-oral, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the academic literature. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried in mid-April 2021. Manual screening of the reference lists of the identified publications was performed to identify papers missed from the database search. All publications returned by the searches were initially included. Exclusion criteria included irrelevance, no reporting of reject rate, no access to the article, and not original article. The total number of images and the number of rejects were recorded for each type of radiographic images. Factors and commonest errors associated with the rejects were recorded. Twenty-six original articles were identified and reviewed. The average reject rate was 11.25% for bitewings, 16.38% for periapicals, 4.10% for panoramics, 6.08% for lateral cephalography, and 2.77% for CBCT. Positioning error and patient movement were two common reasons for the rejects. The average reject rates computed from data pooled across studies should form the reference values for quality assurance programs to follow. Future reject analysis studies should report more radiographic parameters such as type of collimation for intra-oral radiography and patient posture for CBCT.

Image retake rates of cone beam computed tomography in a dental institution

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the frequency and reasons for retaking cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in an oral and maxillofacial radiology imaging clinic in a dental institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort chart audit of the patient image database was performed for 1737 patients attending the Diagnostic Imaging clinic at the Prince Philip Dental Hospital from February 2016 to May 2019, and the rate of, and reasons for, CBCT image re-exposure was tallied. Patient demographics (age and gender) and CBCT acquisition parameters (CBCT unit, field-of-view (FOV), scanned region of interest, and exposure time) were recorded and correlated to retake analysis.

RESULTS

The retake rate was 4.6% (80/1737). The most common reasons for re-exposure were incomplete FOV coverage (57.5%) and motion artifacts (27.5%). Patients under 12 years of age had a significantly higher risk for motion artifacts. CBCT for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) had a significantly higher risk for incomplete FOV coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Children (less than 12 years of age) demonstrate a higher frequency of retakes, principally due to motion artifacts. TMJ CBCT examinations have a higher frequency of retakes due to an incomplete FOV coverage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Information regarding the frequency and reasons for CBCT retakes is beneficial to identify procedures, practices, or patients susceptible to additional radiation exposure and implement appropriate and specific quality control protocols.