The CRISPR-associated Csx1 protein of Pyrococcus furiosus is an adenosine-specific endoribonuclease

Cat1 forms filament networks to degrade NAD+ during the type III CRISPR-Cas antiviral response

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems defend against viral infection in prokaryotes using an RNA-guided complex that recognizes foreign transcripts and synthesizes cyclic oligo-adenylate (cOA) messengers to activate CARF immune effectors. Here we investigated a protein containing a CARF domain fused Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain, Cat1. We found that Cat1 provides immunity by cleaving and depleting NAD+ molecules from the infected host, inducing a growth arrest that prevents viral propagation. Cat1 forms dimers that stack upon each other to generate long filaments that are maintained by bound cOA ligands, with stacked TIR domains forming the NAD+ cleavage catalytic sites. Further, Cat1 filaments assemble into unique trigonal and pentagonal networks that enhance NAD+ degradation. Cat1 presents an unprecedented chemistry and higher-order protein assembly for the CRISPR-Cas response.

Antiviral signaling of a type III CRISPR-associated deaminase

Prokaryotes have evolved diverse defense strategies against viral infection, including foreign nucleic acid degradation by CRISPR-Cas systems and DNA and RNA synthesis inhibition through nucleotide pool depletion. Here, we report an antiviral mechanism of type III CRISPR-Cas-regulated adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion in which ATP is converted into inosine triphosphate (ITP) by CRISPR-Cas-associated adenosine deaminase (CAAD) upon activation by either cA4 or cA6, followed by hydrolysis into inosine monophosphate (IMP) by Nudix hydrolase, ultimately resulting in cell growth arrest. The cryo-electron microscopy structures of CAAD in its apo and activated forms, together with biochemical evidence, revealed how cA4 or cA6 binds to the CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold (CARF) domain and abrogates CAAD autoinhibition, inducing substantial conformational changes that reshape the structure of CAAD and induce its deaminase activity. Our results reveal the mechanism of a CRISPR-Cas-regulated ATP depletion antiviral strategy.

Nucleic acid recognition during prokaryotic immunity

Parasitic elements often spread to hosts through the delivery of their nucleic acids to the recipient. This is particularly true for the primary parasites of bacteria, bacteriophages (phages) and plasmids. Although bacterial immune systems can sense a diverse set of infection signals, such as a protein unique to the invader or the disruption of natural host processes, phage and plasmid nucleic acids represent some of the most common molecules that are recognized as foreign to initiate defense. In this review, we will discuss the various elements of invader nucleic acids that can be distinguished by bacterial host immune systems as "non-self" and how this signal is relayed to activate an immune response.

Cas10 relieves host growth arrest to facilitate spacer retention during type III-A CRISPR-Cas immunity

Cells from all kingdoms of life can enter growth arrest in unfavorable environmental conditions. Key to this process are mechanisms enabling recovery from this state. Staphylococcal type III-A CRISPR-Cas loci encode the Cas10 complex that uses a guide RNA to locate complementary viral transcripts and start an immune response. When the target sequence is expressed late in the viral lytic cycle, defense requires the activity of Csm6, a non-specific RNase that inhibits the growth of the infected cell. How Csm6 protects from infection and whether growth can be restored is not known. Here, we show that growth arrest provides immunity at the population level, preventing viral replication and allowing uninfected cells to propagate. In addition, the ssDNase activity of Cas10 is required for the regrowth of a subset of the arrested cells and the recovery of the infected host, presumably ending the immune response through degradation of the viral DNA.

Selective degradation of phage RNAs by the Csm6 ribonuclease provides robust type III CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus

Type III CRISPR immune systems bind viral or plasmid RNA transcripts and activate Csm3/Cmr4 and Cas10 nucleases to uniquely cleave both invader RNA and DNA, respectively. Additionally, type III effector complexes generate cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) signaling molecules to activate trans-acting, auxiliary Csm6/Csx1 ribonucleases, previously proposed to be non-specific in their in vivo RNA cleavage preference. Despite extensive in vitro studies, the nuclease requirements of type III systems in their native contexts remain poorly understood. Here we systematically investigated the in vivo roles for immunity of each of the three Streptococcus thermophilus (Sth) type III-A Cas nucleases and cOA signaling by challenging nuclease defective mutant strains with plasmid and phage infections. Our results reveal that RNA cleavage by Csm6 is both sufficient and essential for maintaining wild-type levels of immunity. Importantly, Csm6 RNase activity leads to immunity against even high levels of phage challenge without causing host cell dormancy or death. Transcriptomic analyses during phage infection indicated Csm6-mediated and crRNA-directed preferential cleavage of phage transcripts. Our findings highlight the critical role of Csm6 RNase activity in type III immunity and demonstrate specificity for invader RNA transcripts by Csm6 to ensure host cell survival upon phage infection.

Unity among the diverse RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas interference mechanisms

CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated) systems are adaptive immune systems that protect bacteria and archaea from invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs). The Cas protein-CRISPR RNA (crRNA) complex uses complementarity of the crRNA "guide" region to specifically recognize the invader genome. CRISPR effectors that perform targeted destruction of the foreign genome have emerged independently as multi-subunit protein complexes (Class 1 systems) and as single multi-domain proteins (Class 2). These different CRISPR-Cas systems can cleave RNA, DNA, and protein in an RNA-guided manner to eliminate the invader, and in some cases, they initiate programmed cell death/dormancy. The versatile mechanisms of the different CRISPR-Cas systems to target and destroy nucleic acids have been adapted to develop various programmable-RNA-guided tools and have revolutionized the development of fast, accurate, and accessible genomic applications. In this review, we present the structure and interference mechanisms of different CRISPR-Cas systems and an analysis of their unified features. The three types of Class 1 systems (I, III, and IV) have a conserved right-handed helical filamentous structure that provides a backbone for sequence-specific targeting while using unique proteins with distinct mechanisms to destroy the invader. Similarly, all three Class 2 types (II, V, and VI) have a bilobed architecture that binds the RNA-DNA/RNA hybrid and uses different nuclease domains to cleave invading MGEs. Additionally, we highlight the mechanistic similarities of CRISPR-Cas enzymes with other RNA-cleaving enzymes and briefly present the evolutionary routes of the different CRISPR-Cas systems.

The Cas10 nuclease activity relieves host dormancy to facilitate spacer acquisition and retention during type III-A CRISPR immunity

A hallmark of CRISPR immunity is the acquisition of short viral DNA sequences, known as spacers, that are transcribed into guide RNAs to recognize complementary sequences. The staphylococcal type III-A CRISPR-Cas system uses guide RNAs to locate viral transcripts and start a response that displays two mechanisms of immunity. When immunity is triggered by an early-expressed phage RNA, degradation of viral ssDNA can cure the host from infection. In contrast, when the RNA guide targets a late-expressed transcript, defense requires the activity of Csm6, a non-specific RNase. Here we show that Csm6 triggers a growth arrest of the host that provides immunity at the population level which hinders viral propagation to allow the replication of non-infected cells. We demonstrate that this mechanism leads to defense against not only the target phage but also other viruses present in the population that fail to replicate in the arrested cells. On the other hand, dormancy limits the acquisition and retention of spacers that trigger it. We found that the ssDNase activity of type III-A systems is required for the re-growth of a subset of the arrested cells, presumably through the degradation of the phage DNA, ending target transcription and inactivating the immune response. Altogether, our work reveals a built-in mechanism within type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems that allows the exit from dormancy needed for the subsistence of spacers that provide broad-spectrum immunity.

Type III CRISPR-Cas: beyond the Cas10 effector complex

Type III CRISPR-Cas loci encode some of the most abundant, yet complex, immune systems of prokaryotes. They are composed of a Cas10 complex that uses an RNA guide to recognize transcripts from bacteriophage and plasmid invaders. Target recognition triggers three activities within this complex: ssDNA degradation, synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylates (cOA) that act as second messengers to activate CARF-domain effectors, and cleavage of target RNA. This review covers recent research in type III CRISPR-Cas systems that looked beyond the activity of the canonical Cas10 complexes towards: (i) ancillary nucleases and understanding how they provide defense by sensing cOA molecules; (ii) ring nucleases and their role in regulating cOA production; and (iii) CRISPR-associated proteases, including the function of the Craspase complex in a transcriptional response to phage infection.

Molecular basis for inhibition of type III-B CRISPR-Cas by an archaeal viral anti-CRISPR protein

Despite a wide presence of type III clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, CRISPR-associated (CRISPR-Cas) in archaea and bacteria, very few anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins inhibiting type III immunity have been identified, and even less is known about their inhibition mechanism. Here, we present the discovery of a type III CRISPR-Cas inhibitor, AcrIIIB2, encoded by Sulfolobus virus S. islandicus rod-shaped virus 3 (SIRV3). AcrIIIB2 inhibits type III-B CRISPR-Cas immune response to protospacers encoded in middle/late-expressed viral genes. Investigation of the interactions between S. islandicus type III-B CRISPR-Cas Cmr-α-related proteins and AcrIIIB2 reveals that the Acr does not bind to Csx1 but rather interacts with the Cmr-α effector complex. Furthermore, in vitro assays demonstrate that AcrIIIB2 can block the dissociation of cleaved target RNA from the Cmr-α complex, thereby inhibiting the Cmr-α turnover, thus preventing host cellular dormancy and further viral genome degradation by the type III-B CRISPR-Cas immunity.

Progress of CRISPR-based programmable RNA manipulation and detection

Prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR associated (CRISPR-Cas) systems provide adaptive immunity by using RNA-guided endonucleases to recognize and eliminate invading foreign nucleic acids. Type II Cas9, type V Cas12, type VI Cas13, and type III Csm/Cmr complexes have been well characterized and developed as programmable platforms for selectively targeting and manipulating RNA molecules of interest in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. These Cas effectors exhibit remarkable diversity of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) composition, target recognition and cleavage mechanisms, and self discrimination mechanisms, which are leveraged for various RNA targeting applications. Here, we summarize the current understanding of mechanistic and functional characteristics of these Cas effectors, give an overview on RNA detection and manipulation toolbox established so far including knockdown, editing, imaging, modification, and mapping RNA-protein interactions, and discuss the future directions for CRISPR-based RNA targeting tools. This article is categorized under: RNA Methods > RNA Analyses in Cells RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

The arms race between bacteria CBASS and bacteriophages

The Bacterial Cyclic oligonucleotide-Based Anti-phage Signaling System (CBASS) is an innate immune system that induces cell suicide to defend against phage infections. This system relies on cGAS/DncV-like nucleotidyltransferases (CD-NTase) to synthesize cyclic oligonucleotides (cOs) and CD-NTase-associated proteins (Caps) to execute cell death through DNA cleavage, membrane damage, and NAD depletion, thereby inhibiting phage replication. Ancillary proteins expressed in CBASS, in combination with CD-NTase, ensure the normal synthesis of cOs and prepare CD-NTase for full activation by binding to phage genomes, proteins, or other unknown products. To counteract cell death induced by CBASS, phage genes encode immune evasion proteins that curb Cap recognition of cOs, allowing for phage replication, assembly, and propagation in bacterial cells. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of CBASS immunity, comparing it with different bacterial immune systems and highlighting the interplay between CBASS and phage. Additionally, it explores similar immune escape methods based on shared proteins and action mechanisms between prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses.

Molecular basis of stepwise cyclic tetra-adenylate cleavage by the type III CRISPR ring nuclease Crn1/Sso2081

The cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs) act as second messengers of the type III CRISPR immunity system through activating the auxiliary nucleases for indiscriminate RNA degradation. The cOA-degrading nucleases (ring nucleases) provide an 'off-switch' regulation of the signaling, thereby preventing cell dormancy or cell death. Here, we describe the crystal structures of the founding member of CRISPR-associated ring nuclease 1 (Crn1) Sso2081 from Saccharolobus solfataricus, alone, bound to phosphate ions or cA4 in both pre-cleavage and cleavage intermediate states. These structures together with biochemical characterizations establish the molecular basis of cA4 recognition and catalysis by Sso2081. The conformational changes in the C-terminal helical insert upon the binding of phosphate ions or cA4 reveal a gate-locking mechanism for ligand binding. The critical residues and motifs identified in this study provide a new insight to distinguish between cOA-degrading and -nondegrading CARF domain-containing proteins.

Enzymatic properties of CARF-domain proteins in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

Prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated genes) systems provide immunity against invading genetic elements such as bacteriophages and plasmids. In type III CRISPR systems, the recognition of target RNA leads to the synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) second messengers that activate ancillary effector proteins via their CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold (CARF) domains. Commonly, these are ribonucleases (RNases) that unspecifically degrade both invader and host RNA. To mitigate adverse effects on cell growth, ring nucleases can degrade extant cOAs to switch off ancillary nucleases. Here we show that the model organism Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 harbors functional CARF-domain effector and ring nuclease proteins. We purified and characterized the two ancillary CARF-domain proteins from the III-D type CRISPR system of this cyanobacterium. The Csx1 homolog, SyCsx1, is a cyclic tetraadenylate(cA4)-dependent RNase with a strict specificity for cytosine nucleotides. The second CARF-domain protein with similarity to Csm6 effectors, SyCsm6, did not show RNase activity in vitro but was able to break down cOAs and attenuate SyCsx1 RNase activity. Our data suggest that the CRISPR systems in Synechocystis confer a multilayered cA4-mediated defense mechanism.

The diverse arsenal of type III CRISPR-Cas-associated CARF and SAVED effectors

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems make use of a multi-subunit effector complex to target foreign (m)RNA transcripts complementary to the guide/CRISPR RNA (crRNA). Base-pairing of the target RNA with specialized regions in the crRNA not only triggers target RNA cleavage, but also activates the characteristic Cas10 subunit and sets in motion a variety of catalytic activities that starts with the production of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) second messenger molecules. These messenger molecules can activate an extensive arsenal of ancillary effector proteins carrying the appropriate sensory domain. Notably, the CARF and SAVED effector proteins have been responsible for renewed interest in type III CRISPR-Cas due to the extraordinary diversity of defenses against invading genetic elements. Whereas only a handful of CARF and SAVED proteins have been studied so far, many of them seem to provoke abortive infection, aimed to kill the host and provide population-wide immunity. A defining feature of these effector proteins is the variety of in silico-predicted catalytic domains they are fused to. In this mini-review, we discuss all currently characterized type III-associated CARF and SAVED effector proteins, highlight a few examples of predicted CARF and SAVED proteins with interesting predicted catalytic activities, and speculate how they could contribute to type III immunity.

Inactivation of Target RNA Cleavage of a III-B CRISPR-Cas System Induces Robust Autoimmunity in Saccharolobus islandicus

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems show the target (tg)RNA-activated indiscriminate DNA cleavage and synthesis of oligoadenylates (cOA) and a secondary signal that activates downstream nuclease effectors to exert indiscriminate RNA/DNA cleavage, and both activities are regulated in a spatiotemporal fashion. In III-B Cmr systems, cognate tgRNAs activate the two Cmr2-based activities, which are then inactivated via tgRNA cleavage by Cmr4, but how Cmr4 nuclease regulates the Cmr immunization remains to be experimentally characterized. Here, we conducted mutagenesis of Cmr4 conserved amino acids in Saccharolobus islandicus, and this revealed that Cmr4α RNase-dead (dCmr4α) mutation yields cell dormancy/death. We also found that plasmid-borne expression of dCmr4α in the wild-type strain strongly reduced plasmid transformation efficiency, and deletion of CRISPR arrays in the host genome reversed the dCmr4α inhibition. Expression of dCmr4α also strongly inhibited plasmid transformation with Cmr2α^HD and Cmr2α^Palm mutants, but the inhibition was diminished in Cmr2α^HD,Palm. Since dCmr4α-containing effectors lack spatiotemporal regulation, this allows an everlasting interaction between crRNA and cellular RNAs to occur. As a result, some cellular RNAs, which are not effective in mediating immunity due to the presence of spatiotemporal regulation, trigger autoimmunity of the Cmr-α system in the S. islandicus cells expressing dCmr4α. Together, these results pinpoint the crucial importance of tgRNA cleavage in autoimmunity avoidance and in the regulation of immunization of type III systems.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated genome-editing toolkit to enhance salt stress tolerance in rice and wheat

The rice and wheat agricultural system is the primary source of food for billions across the world. However, the productivity and long-term sustainability of rice and wheat are threatened by a large number of abiotic stresses, especially salinity stress. Salinity has a significant impact on plant development and productivity and is one of the leading causes of crop yield losses in agricultural soils worldwide. Over the last few decades, several attempts have been undertaken to enhance salinity stress tolerance, most of which have relied on traditional or molecular breeding approaches. These approaches have so far been insufficient in addressing the issues of abiotic stress. However, due to the availability of genome sequences for cereal crops like rice and wheat and the development of genome editing techniques like clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein9 (Cas9), it is now possible to "edit" genes and influence key traits. Here, we review the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in both rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to develop salinity tolerant cultivars. The CRISPR/Cas genome editing toolkit holds great promise of producing cereal crops tolerant to salt stress to increase agriculture resilience with a strong impact on the environment and public health.

Different modes of spacer acquisition by the Staphylococcus epidermidis type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotic organisms with an adaptive defense mechanism that acquires immunological memories of infections. This is accomplished by integration of short fragments from the genome of invaders such as phages and plasmids, called ‘spacers’, into the CRISPR locus of the host. Depending on their genetic composition, CRISPR-Cas systems can be classified into six types, I-VI, however spacer acquisition has been extensively studied only in type I and II systems. Here, we used an inducible spacer acquisition assay to study this process in the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Staphylococcus epidermidis, in the absence of phage selection. Similarly to type I and II spacer acquisition, this type III system uses Cas1 and Cas2 to preferentially integrate spacers from the chromosomal terminus and free dsDNA ends produced after DNA breaks, in a manner that is enhanced by the AddAB DNA repair complex. Surprisingly, a different mode of spacer acquisition from rRNA and tRNA loci, which spans only the transcribed sequences of these genes and is not enhanced by AddAB, was also detected. Therefore, our findings reveal both common mechanistic principles that may be conserved in all CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as unique and intriguing features of type III spacer acquisition.

Unique properties of spacer acquisition by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have a unique mode of interference, involving crRNA-guided recognition of nascent RNA and leading to DNA and RNA degradation. How type III systems acquire new CRISPR spacers is currently not well understood. Here, we characterize CRISPR spacer uptake by a type III-A system within its native host, Streptococcus thermophilus. Adaptation by the type II-A system in the same host provided a basis for comparison. Cas1 and Cas2 proteins were critical for type III adaptation but deletion of genes responsible for crRNA biogenesis or interference did not detectably change spacer uptake patterns, except those related to host counter-selection. Unlike the type II-A system, type III spacers are acquired in a PAM- and orientation-independent manner. Interestingly, certain regions of plasmids and the host genome were particularly well-sampled during type III-A, but not type II-A, spacer uptake. These regions included the single-stranded origins of rolling-circle replicating plasmids, rRNA and tRNA encoding gene clusters, promoter regions of expressed genes and 5′ UTR regions involved in transcription attenuation. These features share the potential to form DNA secondary structures, suggesting a preferred substrate for type III adaptation. Lastly, the type III-A system adapted to and protected host cells from lytic phage infection.

Cyclic Tetra-Adenylate (cA4) Recognition by Csa3; Implications for an Integrated Class 1 CRISPR-Cas Immune Response in Saccharolobus solfataricus

Csa3 family transcription factors are ancillary CRISPR-associated proteins composed of N-terminal CARF domains and C-terminal winged helix-turn-helix domains. The activity of Csa3 transcription factors is thought to be controlled by cyclic oligoadenyate (cOA) second messengers produced by type III CRISPR-Cas surveillance complexes. Here we show that Saccharolobus solfataricus Csa3a recognizes cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA₄) and that Csa3a lacks self-regulating "ring nuclease" activity present in some other CARF domain proteins. The crystal structure of the Csa3a/cA4 complex was also determined and the structural and thermodynamic basis for cA₄ recognition are described, as are conformational changes in Csa3a associated with cA₄ binding. We also characterized the effect of cA₄ on recognition of putative DNA binding sites. Csa3a binds to putative promoter sequences in a nonspecific, cooperative and cA₄-independent manner, suggesting a more complex mode of transcriptional regulation. We conclude the Csa3a/cA₄ interaction represents a nexus between the type I and type III CRISPR-Cas systems present in S. solfataricus, and discuss the role of the Csa3/cA₄ interaction in coordinating different arms of this integrated class 1 immune system to mount a synergistic, highly orchestrated immune response.

Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems: Deciphering the Most Complex Prokaryotic Immune System

The emergence and persistence of selfish genetic elements is an intrinsic feature of all living systems. Cellular organisms have evolved a plethora of elaborate defense systems that limit the spread of such genetic parasites. CRISPR-Cas are RNA-guided defense systems used by prokaryotes to recognize and destroy foreign nucleic acids. These systems acquire and store fragments of foreign nucleic acids and utilize the stored sequences as guides to recognize and destroy genetic invaders. CRISPR-Cas systems have been extensively studied, as some of them are used in various genome editing technologies. Although Type III CRISPR-Cas systems are among the most common CRISPR-Cas systems, they are also some of the least investigated ones, mostly due to the complexity of their action compared to other CRISPR-Cas system types. Type III effector complexes specifically recognize and cleave RNA molecules. The recognition of the target RNA activates the effector large subunit - the so-called CRISPR polymerase - which cleaves DNA and produces small cyclic oligonucleotides that act as signaling molecules to activate auxiliary effectors, notably non-specific RNases. In this review, we provide a historical overview of the sometimes meandering pathway of the Type III CRISPR research. We also review the current data on the structures and activities of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems components, their biological roles, and evolutionary history. Finally, using structural modeling with AlphaFold2, we show that the archaeal HRAMP signature protein, which heretofore has had no assigned function, is a degenerate relative of Type III CRISPR-Cas signature protein Cas10, suggesting that HRAMP systems have descended from Type III CRISPR-Cas systems or their ancestors.

A type III-A CRISPR-Cas system mediates co-transcriptional DNA cleavage at the transcriptional bubbles in close proximity to active effectors

Many type III CRISPR–Cas systems rely on the cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) signaling pathway to exert immunization. However, LdCsm, a type III-A lactobacilli immune system mediates efficient plasmid clearance in spite of lacking cOA signaling. Thus, the system provides a good model for detailed characterization of the RNA-activated DNase in vitro and in vivo. We found ATP functions as a ligand to enhance the LdCsm ssDNase, and the ATP enhancement is essential for in vivo plasmid clearance. In vitro assays demonstrated LdCsm cleaved transcriptional bubbles at any positions in non-template strand, suggesting that DNA cleavage may occur for transcribing DNA. Destiny of target plasmid versus nontarget plasmid in Escherichia coli cells was investigated, and this revealed that the LdCsm effectors mediated co-transcriptional DNA cleavage to both target and nontarget plasmids, suggesting LdCsm effectors can mediate DNA cleavage to any transcriptional bubbles in close proximity upon activation. Subcellular locations of active LdCsm effectors were then manipulated by differential expression of LdCsm and CTR, and the data supported the hypothesis. Strikingly, stepwise induction experiments indicated allowing diffusion of LdCsm effector led to massive chromosomal DNA degradation, suggesting this unique IIIA system can facilitate infection abortion to eliminate virus-infected cells.

Cyclic oligoadenylate signalling and regulation by ring nucleases during type III CRISPR defence

In prokaryotes, CRISPR-Cas immune systems recognise and cleave foreign nucleic acids to defend against Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs). Type III CRISPR-Cas complexes also synthesise cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) second messengers, which activate CRISPR ancillary proteins involved in antiviral defence. In particular, cOA-stimulated nucleases degrade RNA and DNA non-specifically, which slows MGE replication but also impedes cell growth, necessitating mechanisms to eliminate cOA in order to mitigate collateral damage. Extant cOA is degraded by a new class of enzyme termed a 'ring nuclease', which cleaves cOA specifically and switches off CRISPR ancillary enzymes. Several ring nuclease families have been characterised to date, including a family used by MGEs to circumvent CRISPR immunity, and encompass diverse protein folds and distinct cOA cleavage mechanisms. In this review we outline cOA signalling, discuss how different ring nucleases regulate the cOA signalling pathway, and reflect on parallels between cyclic nucleotide-based immune systems to reveal new areas for exploration.

The Card1 nuclease provides defence during type III CRISPR immunity

In the type III CRISPR-Cas immune response of prokaryotes, infection triggers the production of cyclic oligoadenylates that bind and activate proteins that contain a CARF domain^1,2. Many type III loci are associated with proteins in which the CRISPR-associated Rossman fold (CARF) domain is fused to a restriction  endonuclease-like domain^3,4. However, with the exception of the well-characterized Csm6 and Csx1 ribonucleases^5,6, whether and how these inducible effectors provide defence is not known. Here we investigated a type III CRISPR accessory protein, which we name cyclic-oligoadenylate-activated single-stranded ribonuclease and single-stranded deoxyribonuclease 1 (Card1). Card1 forms a symmetrical dimer that has a large central cavity between its CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold and restriction endonuclease domains that binds cyclic tetra-adenylate. The binding of ligand results in a conformational change comprising the rotation of individual monomers relative to each other to form a more compact dimeric scaffold, in which a manganese cation coordinates the catalytic residues and activates the cleavage of single-stranded-but not double-stranded-nucleic acids (both DNA and RNA). In vivo, activation of Card1 induces dormancy of the infected hosts to provide immunity against phage infection and plasmids. Our results highlight the diversity of strategies used in CRISPR systems to provide immunity.

Heavily Armed Ancestors: CRISPR Immunity and Applications in Archaea with a Comparative Analysis of CRISPR Types in Sulfolobales

Prokaryotes are constantly coping with attacks by viruses in their natural environments and therefore have evolved an impressive array of defense systems. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is an adaptive immune system found in the majority of archaea and about half of bacteria which stores pieces of infecting viral DNA as spacers in genomic CRISPR arrays to reuse them for specific virus destruction upon a second wave of infection. In detail, small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) are transcribed from CRISPR arrays and incorporated into type-specific CRISPR effector complexes which further degrade foreign nucleic acids complementary to the crRNA. This review gives an overview of CRISPR immunity to newcomers in the field and an update on CRISPR literature in archaea by comparing the functional mechanisms and abundances of the diverse CRISPR types. A bigger fraction is dedicated to the versatile and prevalent CRISPR type III systems, as tremendous progress has been made recently using archaeal models in discerning the controlled molecular mechanisms of their unique tripartite mode of action including RNA interference, DNA interference and the unique cyclic-oligoadenylate signaling that induces promiscuous RNA shredding by CARF-domain ribonucleases. The second half of the review spotlights CRISPR in archaea outlining seminal in vivo and in vitro studies in model organisms of the euryarchaeal and crenarchaeal phyla, including the application of CRISPR-Cas for genome editing and gene silencing. In the last section, a special focus is laid on members of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophilic order Sulfolobales by presenting a thorough comparative analysis about the distribution and abundance of CRISPR-Cas systems, including arrays and spacers as well as CRISPR-accessory proteins in all 53 genomes available to date. Interestingly, we find that CRISPR type III and the DNA-degrading CRISPR type I complexes co-exist in more than two thirds of these genomes. Furthermore, we identified ring nuclease candidates in all but two genomes and found that they generally co-exist with the above-mentioned CARF domain ribonucleases Csx1/Csm6. These observations, together with published literature allowed us to draft a working model of how CRISPR-Cas systems and accessory proteins cross talk to establish native CRISPR anti-virus immunity in a Sulfolobales cell.

Evolutionary and functional classification of the CARF domain superfamily, key sensors in prokaryotic antivirus defense

CRISPR-associated Rossmann Fold (CARF) and SMODS-associated and fused to various effector domains (SAVED) are key components of cyclic oligonucleotide-based antiphage signaling systems (CBASS) that sense cyclic oligonucleotides and transmit the signal to an effector inducing cell dormancy or death. Most of the CARFs are components of a CBASS built into type III CRISPR-Cas systems, where the CARF domain binds cyclic oligoA (cOA) synthesized by Cas10 polymerase-cyclase and allosterically activates the effector, typically a promiscuous ribonuclease. Additionally, this signaling pathway includes a ring nuclease, often also a CARF domain (either the sensor itself or a specialized enzyme) that cleaves cOA and mitigates dormancy or death induction. We present a comprehensive census of CARF and SAVED domains in bacteria and archaea, and their sequence- and structure-based classification. There are 10 major families of CARF domains and multiple smaller groups that differ in structural features, association with distinct effectors, and presence or absence of the ring nuclease activity. By comparative genome analysis, we predict specific functions of CARF and SAVED domains and partition the CARF domains into those with both sensor and ring nuclease functions, and sensor-only ones. Several families of ring nucleases functionally associated with sensor-only CARF domains are also predicted.

Chemistry of Class 1 CRISPR-Cas effectors: Binding, editing, and regulation

Among the multiple antiviral defense mechanisms found in prokaryotes, CRISPR-Cas systems stand out as the only known RNA-programmed pathways for detecting and destroying bacteriophages and plasmids. Class 1 CRISPR-Cas systems, the most widespread and diverse of these adaptive immune systems, use an RNA-guided multiprotein complex to find foreign nucleic acids and trigger their destruction. In this review, we describe how these multisubunit complexes target and cleave DNA and RNA and how regulatory molecules control their activities. We also highlight similarities to and differences from Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, which use a single-protein effector, as well as other types of bacterial and eukaryotic immune systems. We summarize current applications of the Class 1 CRISPR-Cas systems for DNA/RNA modification, control of gene expression, and nucleic acid detection.

Tetramerisation of the CRISPR ring nuclease Crn3/Csx3 facilitates cyclic oligoadenylate cleavage

Type III CRISPR systems detect foreign RNA and activate the cyclase domain of the Cas10 subunit, generating cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules that act as a second messenger to signal infection, activating nucleases that degrade the nucleic acid of both invader and host. This can lead to dormancy or cell death; to avoid this, cells need a way to remove cOA from the cell once a viral infection has been defeated. Enzymes specialised for this task are known as ring nucleases, but are limited in their distribution. Here, we demonstrate that the widespread CRISPR associated protein Csx3, previously described as an RNA deadenylase, is a ring nuclease that rapidly degrades cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA4). The enzyme has an unusual cooperative reaction mechanism involving an active site that spans the interface between two dimers, sandwiching the cA4 substrate. We propose the name Crn3 (CRISPR associated ring nuclease 3) for the Csx3 family.

Regulation of the RNA and DNA nuclease activities required for Pyrococcus furiosus Type III-B CRISPR-Cas immunity

Type III CRISPR-Cas prokaryotic immune systems provide anti-viral and anti-plasmid immunity via a dual mechanism of RNA and DNA destruction. Upon target RNA interaction, Type III crRNP effector complexes become activated to cleave both target RNA (via Cas7) and target DNA (via Cas10). Moreover, trans-acting endoribonucleases, Csx1 or Csm6, can promote the Type III immune response by destroying both invader and host RNAs. Here, we characterize how the RNase and DNase activities associated with Type III-B immunity in Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) are regulated by target RNA features and second messenger signaling events. In vivo mutational analyses reveal that either the DNase activity of Cas10 or the RNase activity of Csx1 can effectively direct successful anti-plasmid immunity. Biochemical analyses confirmed that the Cas10 Palm domains convert ATP into cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) compounds that activate the ribonuclease activity of Pfu Csx1. Furthermore, we show that the HEPN domain of the adenosine-specific endoribonuclease, Pfu Csx1, degrades cOA signaling molecules to provide an auto-inhibitory off-switch of Csx1 activation. Activation of both the DNase and cOA generation activities require target RNA binding and recognition of distinct target RNA 3' protospacer flanking sequences. Our results highlight the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling Type III CRISPR immunity.

Activation and self-inactivation mechanisms of the cyclic oligoadenylate-dependent CRISPR ribonuclease Csm6

Bacterial and archaeal CRISPR-Cas systems provide RNA-guided immunity against genetic invaders such as bacteriophages and plasmids. Upon target RNA recognition, type III CRISPR-Cas systems produce cyclic-oligoadenylate second messengers that activate downstream effectors, including Csm6 ribonucleases, via their CARF domains. Here, we show that Enteroccocus italicus Csm6 (EiCsm6) degrades its cognate cyclic hexa-AMP (cA6) activator, and report the crystal structure of EiCsm6 bound to a cA6 mimic. Our structural, biochemical, and in vivo functional assays reveal how cA6 recognition by the CARF domain activates the Csm6 HEPN domains for collateral RNA degradation, and how CARF domain-mediated cA6 cleavage provides an intrinsic off-switch to limit Csm6 activity in the absence of ring nucleases. These mechanisms facilitate rapid invader clearance and ensure termination of CRISPR interference to limit self-toxicity.

Upon target RNA recognition, type III CRISPR-Cas systems produce cyclic oligoadenylates that activate effectors such as Csm6 ribonucleases. Here, Garcia-Doval et al. show that Enteroccocus italicus Csm6 degrades its cyclic hexa-AMP activator, and report the crystal structure of the protein bound to an activator mimic.

RNA-Targeting CRISPR-Cas Systems and Their Applications

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems have revolutionized modern molecular biology. Numerous types of these systems have been discovered to date. Many CRISPR-Cas systems have been used as a backbone for the development of potent research tools, with Cas9 being the most widespread. While most of the utilized systems are DNA-targeting, recently more and more attention is being gained by those that target RNA. Their ability to specifically recognize a given RNA sequence in an easily programmable way makes them ideal candidates for developing new research tools. In this review we summarize current knowledge on CRISPR-Cas systems which have been shown to target RNA molecules, that is type III (Csm/Cmr), type VI (Cas13), and type II (Cas9). We also present a list of available technologies based on these systems.

Structure and mechanism of a Type III CRISPR defence DNA nuclease activated by cyclic oligoadenylate

The CRISPR system provides adaptive immunity against mobile genetic elements in prokaryotes. On binding invading RNA species, Type III CRISPR systems generate cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) signalling molecules, potentiating a powerful immune response by activating downstream effector proteins, leading to viral clearance, cell dormancy or death. Here we describe the structure and mechanism of a cOA-activated CRISPR defence DNA endonuclease, CRISPR ancillary nuclease 1 (Can1). Can1 has a unique monomeric structure with two CRISPR associated Rossman fold (CARF) domains and two DNA nuclease-like domains. The crystal structure of the enzyme has been captured in the activated state, with a cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA₄) molecule bound at the core of the protein. cA₄ binding reorganises the structure to license a metal-dependent DNA nuclease activity specific for nicking of supercoiled DNA. DNA nicking by Can1 is predicted to slow down viral replication kinetics by leading to the collapse of DNA replication forks.

Antiviral defence type III CRISPR systems produce cyclic oligoadenylates (cOA) as second messengers that activate downstream effectors. Here the authors present the crystal structure of the type III CRISPR defence DNA nuclease Can1 in complex with cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA₄) and show that Can1 nicks supercoiled DNA.

Cyclic oligoadenylate signalling mediates Mycobacterium tuberculosis CRISPR defence

The CRISPR system provides adaptive immunity against mobile genetic elements (MGE) in prokaryotes. In type III CRISPR systems, an effector complex programmed by CRISPR RNA detects invading RNA, triggering a multi-layered defence that includes target RNA cleavage, licencing of an HD DNA nuclease domain and synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules. cOA activates the Csx1/Csm6 family of effectors, which degrade RNA non-specifically to enhance immunity. Type III systems are found in diverse archaea and bacteria, including the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of the in vitro and in vivo activities of the type III-A M. tuberculosis CRISPR system. We demonstrate that immunity against MGE may be achieved predominantly via a cyclic hexa-adenylate (cA6) signalling pathway and the ribonuclease Csm6, rather than through DNA cleavage by the HD domain. Furthermore, we show for the first time that a type III CRISPR system can be reprogrammed by replacing the effector protein, which may be relevant for maintenance of immunity in response to pressure from viral anti-CRISPRs. These observations demonstrate that M. tuberculosis has a fully-functioning CRISPR interference system that generates a range of cyclic and linear oligonucleotides of known and unknown functions, potentiating fundamental and applied studies.

Composition and Diversity of CRISPR-Cas13a Systems in the Genus Leptotrichia

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas13a, previously known as CRISPR-C2c2, is the most recently identified RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas system that has the unique characteristics of both targeted and collateral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) cleavage activities. This system was first identified in Leptotrichia shahii. Here, the complete whole genome sequences of 11 Leptotrichia strains were determined and compared with 18 publicly available Leptotrichia genomes in regard to the composition, occurrence and diversity of the CRISPR-Cas13a, and other CRISPR-Cas systems. Various types of CRISPR-Cas systems were found to be unevenly distributed among the Leptotrichia genomes, including types I-B (10/29, 34.4%), II-C (1/29, 2.6%), III-A (6/29, 15.4%), III-D (6/29, 15.4%), III-like (3/29, 7.7%), and VI-A (11/29, 37.9%), while 8 strains (20.5%) had no CRISPR-Cas system at all. The Cas13a effectors were found to be highly divergent with amino acid sequence similarities ranging from 61% to 90% to that of L. shahii, but their collateral ssRNA cleavage activities leading to impediment of bacterial growth were conserved. CRISPR-Cas spacers represent a sequential achievement of former intruder encounters, and the retained spacers reflect the evolutionary phylogeny or relatedness of strains. Analysis of spacer contents and numbers among Leptotrichia species showed considerable diversity with only 4.4% of spacers (40/889) were shared by two strains. The organization and distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems (type I-VI) encoded by all registered Leptotrichia species revealed that effector or spacer sequences of the CRISPR-Cas systems were very divergent, and the prevalence of types I, III, and VI was almost equal. There was only one strain carrying type II, while none carried type IV or V. These results provide new insights into the characteristics and divergences of CRISPR-Cas systems among Leptotrichia species.

Inhibition of Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity by an Archaeal Virus-Encoded Anti-CRISPR Protein

Bacteria and archaea possess a striking diversity of CRISPR-Cas systems divided into six types, posing a significant barrier to viral infection. As part of the virus-host arms race, viruses encode protein inhibitors of type I, II, and V CRISPR-Cas systems, but whether there are natural inhibitors of the other, mechanistically distinct CRISPR-Cas types is unknown. Here, we present the discovery of a type III CRISPR-Cas inhibitor, AcrIIIB1, encoded by the Sulfolobus virus SIRV2. AcrIIIB1 exclusively inhibits CRISPR-Cas subtype III-B immunity mediated by the RNase activity of the accessory protein Csx1. AcrIIIB1 does not appear to bind Csx1 but, rather, interacts with two distinct subtype III-B effector complexes-Cmr-α and Cmr-γ-which, in response to protospacer transcript binding, are known to synthesize cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs) that activate the Csx1 "collateral" RNase. Taken together, we infer that AcrIIIB1 inhibits type III-B CRISPR-Cas immunity by interfering with a Csx1 RNase-related process.

Structure of Csx1-cOA4 complex reveals the basis of RNA decay in Type III-B CRISPR-Cas

Type III CRISPR-Cas multisubunit complexes cleave ssRNA and ssDNA. These activities promote the generation of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA), which activates associated CRISPR-Cas RNases from the Csm/Csx families, triggering a massive RNA decay to provide immunity from genetic invaders. Here we present the structure of Sulfolobus islandicus (Sis) Csx1-cOA₄ complex revealing the allosteric activation of its RNase activity. SisCsx1 is a hexamer built by a trimer of dimers. Each dimer forms a cOA₄ binding site and a ssRNA catalytic pocket. cOA₄ undergoes a conformational change upon binding in the second messenger binding site activating ssRNA degradation in the catalytic pockets. Activation is transmitted in an allosteric manner through an intermediate HTH domain, which joins the cOA₄ and catalytic sites. The RNase functions in a sequential cooperative fashion, hydrolyzing phosphodiester bonds in 5′-C-C-3′. The degradation of cOA₄ by Ring nucleases deactivates SisCsx1, suggesting that this enzyme could be employed in biotechnological applications.

Type III CRISPR-Cas RNases from the Csm and Csx families are activated by cyclic oligoadenylates (cOA). Here the authors present the cOA bound Sulfolobus islandicus Csx1 structure, which forms a hexamer and reveal an allosteric mechanism for the activation of Csx1 RNase.

CRISPR-Cas III-A Csm6 CARF Domain Is a Ring Nuclease Triggering Stepwise cA4 Cleavage with ApA>p Formation Terminating RNase Activity

Type III-A CRISPR-Cas surveillance complexes containing multi-subunit Csm effector, guide, and target RNAs exhibit multiple activities, including formation of cyclic-oligoadenylates (cA_n) from ATP and subsequent cA_n-mediated cleavage of single-strand RNA (ssRNA) by the trans-acting Csm6 RNase. Our structure-function studies have focused on Thermococcus onnurineus Csm6 to deduce mechanistic insights into how cA₄ binding to the Csm6 CARF domain triggers the RNase activity of the Csm6 HEPN domain and what factors contribute to regulation of RNA cleavage activity. We demonstrate that the Csm6 CARF domain is a ring nuclease, whereby bound cA₄ is stepwise cleaved initially to ApApApA>p and subsequently to ApA>p in its CARF domain-binding pocket, with such cleavage bursts using a timer mechanism to regulate the RNase activity of the Csm6 HEPN domain. In addition, we establish T. onnurineus Csm6 as an adenosine-specific RNase and identify a histidine in the cA₄ CARF-binding pocket involved in autoinhibitory regulation of RNase activity.

CRISPR-Cas9 directed genome engineering for enhancing salt stress tolerance in rice

Crop productivity in rice is harshly limited due to high concentration of salt in the soil. To understand the intricacies of the mechanism it is important to unravel the key pathways operating inside the plant cell. Emerging state-of-the art technologies have provided the tools to discover the key components inside the plant cell for salt tolerance. Among the molecular entities, transcription factors and/or other important components of sensing and signaling cascades have been the attractive targets and the role of NHX and SOS1 transporters amply described. Not only marker assisted programs but also transgenic approaches by using reverse genetic strategies (knockout or knockdown) or overexpression have been extensively used to engineer rice crop. CRISPR/Cas is an attractive paradigm and provides the feasibility for manipulating several genes simultaneously. Here, in this review we highlight some of the molecular entities that could be potentially targeted for generating rice amenable to sustain growth under high salinity conditions by employing CRISPR/Cas. We also try to address key questions for rice salt stress tolerance other than what is already known.

A Type III CRISPR Ancillary Ribonuclease Degrades Its Cyclic Oligoadenylate Activator

Cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) secondary messengers are generated by type III CRISPR systems in response to viral infection. cOA allosterically activates the CRISPR ancillary ribonucleases Csx1/Csm6, which degrade RNA non-specifically using a HEPN (Higher Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes, Nucleotide binding) active site. This provides effective immunity but can also lead to growth arrest in infected cells, necessitating a means to deactivate the ribonuclease once viral infection has been cleared. In the crenarchaea, dedicated ring nucleases degrade cA₄ (cOA consisting of 4 AMP units), but the equivalent enzyme has not been identified in bacteria. We demonstrate that, in Thermus thermophilus HB8, the uncharacterized protein TTHB144 is a cA₄-activated HEPN ribonuclease that also degrades its activator. TTHB144 binds and degrades cA₄ at an N-terminal CARF (CRISPR-associated Rossman fold) domain. The two activities can be separated by site-directed mutagenesis. TTHB144 is thus the first example of a self-limiting CRISPR ribonuclease.

•

TTHB144 is a cyclic tetra-adenylate activated ribonuclease.

•

TTHB144 degrades cyclic tetra-adenylate at its CARF domain.

•

Self-limiting enzymes like TTHB144 may regulate anti-viral signaling in bacteria.

High-Resolution Structure of Cas13b and Biochemical Characterization of RNA Targeting and Cleavage

Type VI CRISPR-Cas systems contain programmable single-effector RNA-guided RNases, including Cas13b, one of the four known family members. Cas13b, which has been used for both RNA editing and nucleic acid detection, is unique among type VI CRISPR effectors in its linear domain architecture and CRISPR RNA (crRNA) structure. Here, we report the crystal structure of Prevotella buccae Cas13b (PbuCas13b) bound to crRNA at 1.65 Å resolution. This structure, combined with biochemical experiments assaying the stability, kinetics, and function of Cas13b, provides a mechanistic model for Cas13b target RNA recognition and identifies features responsible for target and cleavage specificity. Based on these observations, we generated Cas13b variants with altered cleavage preferences, which may expand the utility of nuclease-based RNA detection assays and other applications of Cas13b in mammalian cells.

Non-specific degradation of transcripts promotes plasmid clearance during type III-A CRISPR-Cas immunity

Type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems employ the Cas10-Csm complex to destroy bacteriophages and plasmids, using a guide RNA to locate complementary RNA molecules from the invader and trigger an immune response that eliminates the infecting DNA. In addition, these systems possess the non-specific RNase Csm6 which provides further protection for the host. While the role of Csm6 in immunity during phage infection was previously determined, how this RNase is used against plasmids is unclear. Here we show that S. epidermidis Csm6 is required for immunity when transcription across the plasmid target is infrequent, leading to impaired target recognition and inefficient DNA degradation by the Cas10-Csm complex. In these conditions Csm6 causes a growth arrest in the host and prevents further plasmid replication through the indiscriminate degradation of host and plasmid transcripts. In contrast, when plasmid target sequences are efficiently transcribed, Csm6 is dispensable and DNA degradation by Cas10 is sufficient for anti-plasmid immunity. Csm6 therefore provides robustness to the type III-A CRISPR-Cas immune response against difficult targets for the Cas10-Csm complex.

CRISPR: a new principle of genome engineering linked to conceptual shifts in evolutionary biology

The CRISPR-Cas systems of bacterial and archaeal adaptive immunity have become a household name among biologists and even the general public thanks to the unprecedented success of the new generation of genome editing tools utilizing Cas proteins. However, the fundamental biological features of CRISPR-Cas are of no lesser interest and have major impacts on our understanding of the evolution of antivirus defense, host-parasite coevolution, self versus non-self discrimination and mechanisms of adaptation. CRISPR-Cas systems present the best known case in point for Lamarckian evolution, i.e. generation of heritable, adaptive genomic changes in response to encounters with external factors, in this case, foreign nucleic acids. CRISPR-Cas systems employ multiple mechanisms of self versus non-self discrimination but, as is the case with immune systems in general, are nevertheless costly because autoimmunity cannot be eliminated completely. In addition to the autoimmunity, the fitness cost of CRISPR-Cas systems appears to be determined by their inhibitory effect on horizontal gene transfer, curtailing evolutionary innovation. Hence the dynamic evolution of CRISPR-Cas loci that are frequently lost and (re)acquired by archaea and bacteria. Another fundamental biological feature of CRISPR-Cas is its intimate connection with programmed cell death and dormancy induction in microbes. In this and, possibly, other immune systems, active immune response appears to be coupled to a different form of defense, namely, "altruistic" shutdown of cellular functions resulting in protection of neighboring cells. Finally, analysis of the evolutionary connections of Cas proteins reveals multiple contributions of mobile genetic elements (MGE) to the origin of various components of CRISPR-Cas systems, furthermore, different biological systems that function by genome manipulation appear to have evolved convergently from unrelated MGE. The shared features of adaptive defense systems and MGE, namely the ability to recognize and cleave unique sites in genomes, make them ideal candidates for genome editing and engineering tools.

Investigation of the cyclic oligoadenylate signaling pathway of type III CRISPR systems

Type III CRISPR effector complexes utilize a bound CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to detect the presence of RNA from invading mobile genetic elements in the cell. This RNA binding results in the activation of two enzymatic domains of the Cas10 subunit-the HD nuclease domain, which degrades DNA, and PALM/cyclase domain. The latter synthesizes cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules by polymerizing ATP, and cOA acts as a second messenger in the cell, switching on the antiviral response by activating host ribonucleases and other proteins. In this chapter, we focus on the methods required to study the biochemistry of this recently discovered cOA signaling pathway. We cover protein expression and purification, synthesis of cOA and its linear analogues, kinetic analysis of cOA synthesis and cOA-stimulated ribonuclease activity, and small molecule detection and identification with thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry. The methods described are based on our recent studies of the type III CRISPR system in Sulfolobus solfataricus, but are widely applicable to other type III systems.

Structure Studies of the CRISPR-Csm Complex Reveal Mechanism of Co-transcriptional Interference

Csm, a type III-A CRISPR-Cas interference complex, is a CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided RNase that also possesses target RNA-dependent DNase and cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) synthetase activities. However, the structural features allowing target RNA-binding-dependent activation of DNA cleavage and cOA generation remain unknown. Here, we report the structure of Csm in complex with crRNA together with structures of cognate or non-cognate target RNA bound Csm complexes. We show that depending on complementarity with the 5' tag of crRNA, the 3' anti-tag region of target RNA binds at two distinct sites of the Csm complex. Importantly, the interaction between the non-complementary anti-tag region of cognate target RNA and Csm1 induces a conformational change at the Csm1 subunit that allosterically activates DNA cleavage and cOA generation. Together, our structural studies provide crucial insights into the mechanistic processes required for crRNA-meditated sequence-specific RNA cleavage, RNA target-dependent non-specific DNA cleavage, and cOA generation.

Molecular Mechanisms of RNA Targeting by Cas13-containing Type VI CRISPR-Cas Systems

Prokaryotic adaptive immune systems use Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins for RNA-guided cleavage of foreign genetic elements. The focus of this review, Type VI CRISPR-Cas systems, contain a single protein, Cas13 (formerly C2c2) that when assembled with a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) forms a crRNA-guided RNA-targeting effector complex. Type VI CRISPR-Cas systems can be divided into four subtypes (A-D) based on Cas13 phylogeny. All Cas13 proteins studied to date possess two enzymatically distinct ribonuclease activities that are required for optimal interference. One RNase is responsible for pre-crRNA processing to form mature Type VI interference complexes, while the other RNase activity provided by the two Higher Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes Nucleotide-binding (HEPN) domains, is required for degradation of target-RNA during viral interference. In this review, I will compare and contrast what is known about the molecular architecture and behavior of Type VI (A-D) CRISPR-Cas13 interference complexes, how this allows them to carry out their RNA-targeting function, how Type VI accessory proteins are able to modulate Cas13 activity, and how together all of these features have led to the rapid development of a range of RNA-targeting applications. Throughout I will also discuss some of the outstanding questions regarding Cas13's molecular behavior, and its role in bacterial adaptive immunity and RNA-targeting applications.

CRISPR-Based Technologies: Impact of RNA-Targeting Systems

DNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems, such as those employing the RNA-guided Cas9 or Cas12 endonucleases, have revolutionized our ability to predictably edit genomes and control gene expression. Here, I summarize information on RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems and describe recent advances in converting them into powerful and programmable RNA-binding and cleavage tools with a wide range of novel and important biotechnological and biomedical applications.

Molecular mechanisms of III-B CRISPR–Cas systems in archaea

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems provide the adaptive antiviral immunity against invasive genetic elements in archaea and bacteria. These immune systems are divided into at least six different types, among which Type III CRISPR–Cas systems show several distinct antiviral activities as demonstrated from the investigation of bacterial III-A and archaeal III-B systems in the past decade. First, although initial experiments suggested that III-A systems provided DNA interference activity, whereas III-B system was active only in RNA interference, these immune systems were subsequently found to mediate the transcription-dependent DNA interference and the dual DNA/RNA interference. Second, their ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes show target RNA (tgRNA) cleavage by a ruler mechanism and RNA-activated indiscriminate single-stranded DNA cleavage, the latter of which is subjected to spatiotemporal regulation such that the DNase activity occurs only at the right place in the right time. Third, RNPs of Type III systems catalyse the synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs) that function as second messengers to activate Csm6 and Csx1, both of which are potent Cas accessory RNases after activation. To date, Type III CRISPR systems are the only known antiviral immunity that utilizes multiple interference mechanisms for antiviral defence.

The ribonuclease activity of Csm6 is required for anti-plasmid immunity by Type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems

CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotes with RNA-based adaptive immunity against viruses and plasmids. A unique feature of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems is that they selectively target transcriptionally-active invader DNA, and can cleave both the expressed RNA transcripts and source DNA. The Type III-A effector crRNP (CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex), which contains Cas proteins Csm1-5, recognizes and degrades invader RNA and DNA in a crRNA-guided, manner. Interestingly, Type III-A systems also employ Csm6, an HEPN family ribonuclease that does not stably associate with the Type III-A effector crRNP, but nevertheless contributes to defense via mechanistic details that are still being determined. Here, we investigated the mechanism of action of Csm6 in Type III-A CRISPR-Cas systems from Lactococcus lactis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus thermophilus expressed in Escherichia coli. We found that L. lactis and S. epidermidis Csm6 cleave RNA specifically after purines in vitro, similar to the activity reported for S. thermophilus Csm6. Moreover, L. lactis Csm6 functions as a divalent metal-independent, single strand-specific endoribonuclease that depends on the conserved HEPN domain. In vivo, we show that deletion of csm6 or expression of an RNase-defective form of Csm6 disrupts crRNA-dependent loss of plasmid DNA in all three systems expressed in E. coli. Mutations in the Csm1 palm domain, which are known to deactivate Csm6 ribonuclease activity, also prevent plasmid loss in the three systems. The results indicate that Csm6 ribonuclease activity rather than Csm1-mediated DNase activity effects anti-plasmid immunity by the three Type III-A systems investigated.