1
|
Tucker J, Oxford M, Goldenberg D, Ziai K, Lighthall JG. Pain Management in Surgical Treatment of Facial Fractures: Alternative Approaches to Opioid Use. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2024; 17:NP319-NP331. [PMID: 39553793 PMCID: PMC11562988 DOI: 10.1177/19433875241236869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Study Design Literature review. Objective This review aims to explore current opioid use trends for surgical management of facial fractures, as well as methods and alternative treatments to decrease opioid use. Methods Review of selected literature from Medline and Google Scholar. Results Despite the devastating effects of the opioid epidemic and recent policy changes aimed at reducing unnecessary opioid prescription, opioids remain commonly used for pain management after facial fracture repair. Recently, use of multimodal analgesic therapy has been suggested to decrease opioid dosage utilized for post-operative pain control. Alternatives to medication therapies have been proposed for pain management; however, standardized recommendations for pain management in facial fracture patients remain unclear. Conclusions Further research is required to establish evidence-based recommendations for pain management in craniofacial fracture repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Tucker
- Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Madison Oxford
- Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Dana Goldenberg
- Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kasra Ziai
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jessyka G. Lighthall
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duckett KA, Kassir MF, Nguyen SA, Brennan EA, Chera BS, Sterba KR, Hughes Halbert C, Hill EG, McCay J, Puram SV, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Ramadan S, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Graboyes EM. Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:320-334. [PMID: 37731255 PMCID: PMC10840985 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT. DATA SOURCES Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively. CONCLUSION Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mohamed Faisal Kassir
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Emily A Brennan
- MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bhishamjit S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- ENT Section, Operative CareLine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hollins A, Pyfer B, Breeze J, Zhang G, Lohmeier SJ, Powers DB. Closed reduction of nasoseptal fractures: key concepts for predictable results. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 61:344-350. [PMID: 37230825 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Nasal complex injuries are the most common facial fracture encountered in the trauma population. Multiple surgical techniques for treatment of these fractures have been described with varying results. The goal of this study was to review the efficacy of closed reduction of nasal and septal fractures using a technique based upon several key concepts. We reviewed the records of patients who had undergone isolated nasal and/or septal fractures with closed reduction at our institution between January 2013 and November 2021. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative CT imaging, surgical treatment within fourteen days of initial injury, and follow up of at least one year. All patients were treated under general or deep sedation. The same surgical technique was applied with closed reduction of the septum and nasal bones with internal and external postoperative splints. Of the 232 records initially reviewed, 103 met inclusion criteria. Four patients had undergone revision septorhinoplasty (3.9%). Mean (range) follow up was 2.7 (1-8.2) years. Three patients had undergone revision nasal repair due to persistent airflow obstruction with complete resolution of symptoms after revision. The other patient received multiple revisions at another institution as a result of their dissatisfaction with cosmesis without improvement. Closed reduction of nasal and septal fractures can be a highly successful procedure and yield predictable results, limiting the need for post-traumatic open septorhinoplastic surgery. Five critical concepts of nasal fracture repair can help surgeons achieve predictable functional and cosmetic results: selection, timing, anaesthesia, reduction, and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hollins
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Bryan Pyfer
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, United States
| | - John Breeze
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, United States; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom(1)
| | - Gloria Zhang
- Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Steven J Lohmeier
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, United States; US Air Force Dental Corps, United States(1)
| | - David B Powers
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thermographic follow-up of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) subsequent to Ramsay Hunt syndrome with multicranial nerve (V, VII, VIII and IX) involvement: a case report. BMC Neurol 2021; 21:39. [PMID: 33509130 PMCID: PMC7840788 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02071-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ramsay Hunt syndrome (RHS) is caused by a reactivation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection, and it is characterized by the symptoms of facial paralysis, otalgia, auricular rash, and/or an oral lesion. Elderly patients or immunocompromised patients, deep pain at the initial visit and no prompt treatment are significant predictors of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). When PHN occurs, especially involved cranial polyneuropathy, multiple modalities should be administered for patients with the intractable PHN. The use of thermography in the follow-up of PHN secondary to RHS with multicranial nerve involvement has not yet been described yet in the literature. Case presentation The patient was a 78-year-old man with the chief complaint of a 3-month history of PHN secondary to RHS with polycranial nerve (V, VII, VIII, and IX) involvement. Multimodality therapy with oral gabapentin, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) application to the Gasserian ganglion for pain in the trigeminal nerve region, linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation for pain in the facial nerve region, and 2% lidocaine spray for pain in the glossopharyngeal nerve region was used to the treat patient, and follow-up evaluations included thermography. This comprehensive treatment obviously improved the quality of life, resulting in considerable pain relief, as indicated by a decrease in the numerical rating scale (NRS) score from 9 to 3 and a decrease in thermal imaging temperature from higher to average temperature on the ipsilateral side compared with the contralateral side. Lidocaine spray on the tonsillar branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve resulted in an improvement in odynophagia, and the NRS score decreased from 9 to 0 for glossopharyngeal neuralgia after three applications. Conclusion Although the use of thermography in the follow-up of RHS with multiple cranial nerve (V, VII, VIII, and IX) involvement is very rare, in this patient, thermal imaging showed the efficacy of combination therapy (oral gabapentin, 2% lidocaine sprayed, PRF application and linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation) and that is a good option for treatment.
Collapse
|