Nasal decongestant and chronic headache: a case of naphazoline overuse headache?

Real-Life Active Surveillance of a Naphazoline/ Hypromellose Fixed Combination's Safety Profile in Peruvian Population

Objective

Identifying the adverse reactions and the possible risks associated with the use of naphazoline 0.1% + hypromellose 0.5% (NAPH), thereby evaluating its tolerability and safety profile.

Methods

A total of 236 Peruvian patients were included in an active pharmacovigilance study drug event monitoring consisting in 2 phone calls conducted in order to register adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the product’s tolerability and to assess the risk concerning specific clinical and demographic characteristics using a binary logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 54 ADRs (one per patient) were reported after the use of NAPH; classified (according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) into two groups of System Organ Class (SOC): eye disorders and nervous system disorders; and four groups of preferred term (PT): eye irritation, vision blurred, eye pruritus and headache. All ADRs were expected, mild and not serious. No risk factors related to the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were identified.

Conclusion

The low incidence of ADRs, their short recovery time, and their categorization as “mild” and “not serious” demonstrates the high tolerability in the studied population; therefore, according to the study, the safety profile for NAPH seems to be adequate, with a suitable tolerability.

Genetics Influences Drug Consumption in Medication Overuse Headache, Not in Migraine: Evidence From Wolframin His611Arg Polymorphism Analysis

Background: The Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism can influence drug consumption in psychiatric patients with impulsive addictive behavior. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the prevalence of the Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism in MOH, a secondary headache belonging to the spectrum of addictive disorders, episodic migraine (EM), and healthy subjects (HS), and its influence on drug consumption.

Methods: One-hundred and seventy-two EM, 107 MOH, and 83 HS were enrolled and genotyped for the Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism. Subjects were classified as homozygous for allele His (H/H subjects), homozygous for allele Arg (R/R subjects), and heterozygous (H/R subjects), regrouped as R/R and carriers of allele H (non-R/R), and matched for clinical data.

Results: There were no differences in allelic distributions between the three groups (p = 0.19). Drug consumption and other clinical characteristics were not influenced by the Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism (p = 0.42; β = 0.04) in the EM group. Among the MOH population, R/R subjects consumed more analgesics (p < 0.0001; β = −0.38), particularly combination drugs (p = 0.0001; d = 2.32).

Discussion: The Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism has a similar prevalence between the MOH, EM, and HS groups. The presence of the R/R genotype does not influence symptomatic drug consumption in EM, whereas it determines an increased use of symptomatic drugs in the MOH group, in particular combination drugs (i.e., drugs containing psychoactive compounds).

Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the Wolframin His611Arg polymorphism plays its effect only in the MOH population, influencing the impulsivity control underlying addictive behavior.