Nutritional assessment

Self-reported body weight and height on admission to hospital: a reliable method in multi-professional evidence-based nutritional care?

Screening patients' nutritional status on admission to hospital is recommended by evidence-based guidelines on malnutrition. In practice, self-reported values for body weight and height are often used by nurses and dieticians. This study assessed the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height and whether these self-reported values might be influenced by the nature of the health-care worker involved. Patients (n = 611) on admission reported their body weight and height to a nurse and a dietician. Reported values were analysed and compared with the measured values. Self-reported values for body weight and height on admission are not always accurate. Patients do report different values to different health-care workers. Self-reported values for body weight to nurses were more accurate as compared with dieticians. Self-reported values for body weight and height are subject to observer bias and should be used with caution in nutritional screening and multi-professional nutritional care.

An audit of nutritional care in a health board in Scotland

This article's aim is to describe the processes used and results found when conducting an audit of nutritional care within a health board area in Scotland. Nutritional standards and an audit tool were developed by a multidisciplinary team and all in-patient clinical areas took part. The results demonstrate that there is still a considerable amount of work that needs to be undertaken to ensure that patients are getting the most effective and efficient nutritional care and this article denotes some of the initiatives instilled to address areas of identified challenges.

Nutritional screening and assessment tools for use by nurses: literature review

AIM

This paper reports a literature review describing the range of published tools available for use by nurses to screen or assess nutritional status of patients/clients, and to examine whether the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity and acceptability of the tool have been investigated. Tools developed specifically for use with older adults are not considered in this review. A screening/assessment tool is described as a tool that uses a questionnaire-type format, contains more than one risk factor for malnutrition and gives an assessment of risk.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of malnutrition in people cared for by nurses is high and screening or assessment tools are often used to identify those with, or at risk of, malnutrition.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review methodology was employed. A range of electronic databases was searched from 1982 to 2002. Search terms incorporating "nutrition", "screening", assessment, feeding, instrument, tool, validity, reliability, sensitivity and specificity were combined. Manual searches were also conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-one nutritional screening/assessment tools were identified of which 35 were reviewed. Tools not reviewed included those which incorporated significant use of biochemical measures (8), included complex anthropometric measures (3), were concerned specifically with ingestion (4) or were designated for use with an older population (21). The tools reviewed use a wide variety of risk factors for malnutrition, varying from anthropometric measurements to socio-cultural aspects of eating behaviour. Some identify an action plan based on the score obtained. Many have not been subjected to validity and/or reliability testing and yet appear to be in use in clinical practice. The sensitivity, specificity and acceptability of the tools are often not investigated.

CONCLUSION

There are many published nutritional screening/assessment tools available for use by nurses to screen or assess the nutritional status of patients/clients. Many have not been subject to rigorous testing. Future work should consider a more standardized approach to the use of these tools.

Methodological issues in the development and use of instruments to assess patient nutritional status or the level of risk of nutritional compromise

This paper presents the results of an appraisal of the evidence for the effectiveness of methods of nutritional assessment currently in use by nurses and from this develops concepts which may be applied to many areas of nursing practice. The paper first shows how the approach to nutritional assessment by nurses has changed over time, producing the present search for methods which are relatively quick and easy to use. It then describes the limited nature of the evidence of effectiveness of these methods and considers the reasons for this situation. It suggests that the difficulty of validation is an important factor and describes the three most common approaches to validation, showing how problems arise from lack of clarity in the definition of terms and the assumption of a simple relationship between the level of risk of nutritional compromise and actual nutritional status. In conclusion, it is suggested that these difficulties illustrate principles applicable to many areas of nursing care, and a definition of 'segments' of care processes, each with well-defined purposes and outcome measures, is proposed. Such an approach will help to demonstrate the complexity and value of nursing activity.

Problems of nutritional assessment in the community

The present paper explores the problems associated with assessment of nutritional status in the community and reviews the literature related to this subject. The first problem is one of terminology, since a logical first step before assessment is screening, which identifies characteristics known to be associated with dietary or nutritional problems. Its purpose is to differentiate individuals who are at high nutritional risk or have poor nutritional status. There are certain factors which should alert the primary health care team to the fact that nutritional intake may be reduced and that risk of malnutrition is increased. These include disease condition, functional disabilities, inadequate or inappropriate food intake, poor dentition or difficulty swallowing, polypharmacy, alcoholism, depression, poor social circumstances or recent discharge from hospital. Patients suffering from these factors need to be identified so that screening becomes a routine part of their medical treatment. At-risk groups include the elderly, the chronically ill, those with cancer and neurological disorders, post-surgical patients and children with developmental disabilities. In the community, practice and community nurses see the majority of at-risk patients and should carry out screening. A number of screening tools have been developed for community use. Most are aimed at the elderly population, but there are others designed to assess nutritional risk in children with developmental disabilities and the general population. These are reviewed and problems of content and validity identified. Some problems associated with nutritional assessment are also reviewed.

Enteral feeding: an overview of indications and techniques

Most patients requiring nutritional support can be successfully managed using enteral feeding, i.e. the provision of nutritional support via the gastrointestinal tract. Various routes of access are available and patients should be assessed on an individual basis by the multidisciplinary team to select the most appropriate method and decide on a suitable regimen. Careful management and regular monitoring of enteral feeding are required in order to ensure safe and cost-effective nutritional support; the use of standard protocols and guidelines is recommended. With appropriate training, monitoring and support, enteral feeding is best provided in the community for many patients, and the use of home enteral feeding is rapidly increasing.

Parenteral nutrition: an overview of current practice

Nutritional support should always be provided via the gastrointestinal tract if possible, but parenteral nutrition, i.e. infusion of nutrients directly into the venous circulation, can be a safe and effective method of nutritional support when used in carefully selected patients and monitored appropriately. A multidisciplinary team approach to patient selection, assessment and monitoring is recommended. Access for parenteral feeding is traditionally via a central vein, but the peripheral route can be used for short-term feeding and should be considered for the majority of patients. Nutritional requirements should be assessed on an individual basis and a feeding regimen designed using standard formulations where possible. The transition back onto oral or enteral nutrition should be closely supervised by a dietitian. Parenteral feeding can be provided to the community if appropriate, but thorough training, monitoring and support are essential.