Factors influencing nurses' inferences about patient pain

Survey of Physician Perspective towards Management of Pain for Chronic Conditions in the Emergency Department

Sickle cell disease (SCD) pain is often acute-on-chronic, likening it to other chronic acute-on-chronic pain conditions. Pain treatment of SCD was already reported as inadequate prior to the current opioid epidemic, but attitudes underlying treatment were understudied. Understanding these attitudes prior to the current epidemic would be revealing. Therefore in 1997, before the current opioid epidemic, we surveyed physicians' attitudes toward pain management and treatment preferences for acute pain exacerbations in the Emergency Department in SCD versus those of chronic pancreatitis and chronic low back pain, two other acute-on-chronic pain diseases. Thirty-nine residency trainees were surveyed in a level one triage hospital. Resident estimates of the rate of opioid addiction in SCD were higher than estimates in both chronic pancreatitis and chronic low back pain. Most residents relied on their personal clinical experience rather than external sources of data or knowledge as the most important driver when they managed chronic pain. This survey research shows that, predating the current opioid epidemic, there was both a backdrop of opioid-phobia and a bias against treating SCD pain compared to other chronic pain conditions among our sample. Repeating this survey research among current training physicians, along with surveys of other attitudes, would provide useful comparisons.

A silent epidemic: community nursing and effective pain management

Effective pain management presents challenges to health care practitioners, particularly in the community setting. This is evident from the complexities associated with the phenomenon of pain and the circumstances for those patients suffering from pain. An overwhelming amount of literature and research surrounding pain exists in an effort to improve our understanding of pain, assessment and management strategies. But patients in pain are not managed well in the community or acute setting. Health care professionals continue to underestimate and under treat pain, failing to meet the patient's individual needs. Pain management it is not about cure, nor is it as simple as reporting zero on a pain score- it is about knowledge, expertise and understanding. Pain is a subjective and very personal experience, wherein health care professionals must listen to the patients' story. Myths and fears surrounding pain remains a barrier to effective management and care. This article aims to dispel the myths and improve clinical practice, particularly in effective pain assessment so patients in the community presenting with pain can be managed individually and effectively. Nurses need to be proactive in their approach, through effective communication and decision making, trusting in our patients' and their pain experience. This is key to a successful approach to managing patients' pain effectively.

Nursing staff, patient, and environmental factors associated with accurate pain assessment

CONTEXT

Although pain ranks highly among reasons for seeking care, routine pain assessment is often inaccurate.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated factors associated with nurses (e.g., registered) and other nursing support staff (e.g., licensed vocational nurses and health technicians) discordance with patients in estimates of pain in a health system where routine pain screening using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) is mandated.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, visit-based, cohort study that included surveys of clinic outpatients (n=465) and nursing staff (n=94) who screened for pain as part of routine vital sign measurement during intake. These data were supplemented by chart review. We compared patient pain levels documented by the nursing staff (N-NRS) with those reported by the patient during the study survey (S-NRS).

RESULTS

Pain underestimation (N-NRS<S-NRS) occurred in 25% and overestimation (N-NRS>S-NRS) in 7% of the cases. Nursing staff used informal pain-screening techniques that did not follow established NRS protocols in half of the encounters. Pain underestimation was positively associated with more years of nursing staff work experience and patient anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder and negatively associated with better patient-reported health status. Pain overestimation was positively associated with nursing staff's use of the full NRS protocol and with a distracting environment in which patient vitals were taken.

CONCLUSION

Despite a long-standing mandate, pain-screening implementation falls short, and informal screening is common.

Work performance and pain intensity during exercise. A before-and-after study of a cognitive-behavioural treatment in primary care of young immigrant patients

PURPOSE

To explore the efficacy of an exercise programme (EP) in primary care on work performance and pain intensity in young immigrants having pain.

SUBJECTS

Patients on long-term sick leave, aged 20-45 years, categorized by sex and 'high education' (>/=8 years) or 'little education' (0-7 years).

METHODS

The 4-week EP was combined to weekly, patient-doctor, dialogue sessions about pain. Two doctors established the clinical status, explored attitudes to exercise and stationary pain behaviour. The EP included daily sessions of an all-round training (15 exercises on five devices in three rounds) led by a physiotherapist, who neglected dysfunctional behaviours. The target for the training was a good work performance (1.5 points), consisting of endurance during a session (0=one round, 1=two rounds, 2=three rounds) and work behaviour (0=bad, 1=acceptable, 2=good), as well as reduced pain intensity measured on a visual analogue scale. Non-parametric statistics were used to detect significant differences between the before-and-after values.

RESULTS

Forty-four men and 73 women, median education 7 years, participated. Nearly all were immigrants. All had muscular pain; 72% were anxious about the pain and 14% were depressed. At the start, nearly all were negative about exercise but participated anyway and significantly improved their work performance (p<0.001) from very low starting values (in median 0.0). Only the highly educated men reached the target levels. The highly educated persons reported less pain, while some men and women with little education reported more pain. The doctors also noted a significant decline in stationary pain behaviour in all sub-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A good efficacy regarding work performance and pain intensity was seen only in the highly educated group.

Registered nurses' and student nurses' assessment of pain and distress related to specific patient and nurse characteristics

Previous studies examining the influence of patient and nurse characteristics on assessments of pain and distress are not consistent in their results. Few studies have focused on the influence of nurses' personality factors on the assessment of pain and distress. The aims of this study were to compare registered nurses' and student nurses' assessments of patients' pain and distress and to identify if the assessment relate to specific patient and nurse characteristics. Seventy-one registered nurses and 184 student nurses assessed pain and distress in three hypothetical cases and responded to personality factors scales. The assessments of pain and distress regarding the patients showed significant differences. The respondents were divided into two groups, respectively, for each patient according to whether the patient's experiences of pain and distress were assessed as more or less intense. Both the groups of registered nurses and student nurses showed significantly differences on personality factors. The groups of student nurses also differed on nursing experience. Patients' age, and type and stage of illness, personality factors, and nursing experience influenced the respondents' assessments. These findings can be used to help educators in nursing to develop strategies to improve skills and knowledge in the assessment at pain and distress.

Reliability of the Bryce/Ragnarsson spinal cord injury pain taxonomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Pain is a common secondary complication of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the literature offers varying estimates of the numbers of persons with SCI who develop pain. The variability in these numbers is caused in part by differences in the classification of pain; there is currently no commonly accepted classification system for pain affecting persons after SCI. This study investigated the interrater reliability of the Bryce/Ragnarsson SCI pain taxonomy (BR-SCI-PT). The hypothesis was that, when used by physicians with minimal training in the BR-SCI-PT, it would have high interrater reliability for the categorization of reported pains.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-five vignettes, each of which described a person with SCI with one or more different etiologic subtypes of pain, were evaluated by 5 groups of up to 10 physicians with SCI subspecialization (39 respondents total). Physician classifications were compared with those made by the investigators.

RESULTS

Of 179 pain descriptions, 83% were categorized correctly to one of the 15 BR-SCI-PT pain types; 93% were categorized correctly with respect to level (above/at/below neurological level of injury), whereas 90% were categorized correctly as being either nociceptive or neuropathic. Subjects expressed a generally high confidence in the correctness of their classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial interrater agreement was achieved in determining subtypes of pain within the BR-SCI-PT. The agreement was improved for categorizing within less restrictive categories (ie, with respect to the neurological level of injury and whether the pain was nociceptive or neuropathic).

Nurses' diagnoses and treatment decisions regarding care of the agitated child

Postoperative agitation has many potential etiologies and remains a significant clinical issue in the pediatric PACU setting. Caring for the agitated child requires a thorough assessment and calls for targeted interventions. This observational study evaluated nurses' diagnoses and treatment decisions regarding care of the agitated child. Nurses were observed during their care of 194 agitated children over a 3-month period. Pain and anxiety were the most commonly identified sources of agitation in the pediatric PACU setting (27% and 25% of cases, respectively), and nurses' targeted, primary interventions for these problems were fairly effective (48% and 67% effective, respectively). Anesthesia-induced agitation was less often identified as the etiology (11%), and primary interventions were more varied and less effective (38%). Physiologic abnormalities were identified as the source for agitation in only 3 cases, but went unrecognized for an extended period in 2 children. Results of this study underscore the complexity of assessment and treatment decisions when caring for agitated children. A decision algorithm based on this study is described as a potential aid toward differentiation of agitation and appropriate intervention.

Nurses' clinical decision-making regarding the management of pain

Effective pain management remains an elusive goal within the profession of nursing. While considerable improvement has occurred, patients continue to experience inappropriate levels of pain. To date, research has focused on objective factors that influence pain management. Few studies have examined attitudinal factors that may influence nurses' decision-making. This quasi-experiment was based on preliminary data showing that nurses' preconceived notions regarding certain patient groups influenced their management of pain. An intervention was tested for its' effect on nurses' preconceived notions regarding specific patient groups. A significant difference in a positive direction was found. Nurses were more willing to spend time and energy managing pain across all patient groups following the intervention.

Nurses’ clinical decision-making regarding the management of pain

Effective pain management remains an elusive goal within the profession of nursing. While considerable improvement has occurred, patients continue to experience inappropriate levels of pain. To date, research has focused on objective factors that influence pain management. Few studies have examined attitudinal factors that may influence nurses' decision-making. This quasi-experiment was based on preliminary data showing that nurses' preconceived notions regarding certain patient groups influenced their management of pain. An intervention was tested for its' effect on nurses' preconceived notions regarding specific patient groups. A significant difference in a positive direction was found. Nurses were more willing to spend time and energy managing pain across all patient groups following the intervention.

Nurses' willingness to manage the pain of specific groups of patients

Effective pain management remains a challenge for the nursing profession. While nurses' knowledge of appropriate pain strategies has improved considerably, additional research needs to be conducted into the influence of factors other than knowledge on the management of pain. This study examined the willingness of nurses (n = 157) and nursing students (n = 265) to spend time and energy managing the pain of different groups of patients, when told that all patients had the same degree of pain. The willingness of nurses to spend time and energy in managing patients' pain was used as a proxy for preconceived notions relative to particular groups of patients. A pattern emerged that suggested that nurses' and nursing students' willingness to spend time and energy managing patients' pain in influenced by their perceptions of different groups of patients.

The application of vignettes in social and nursing research

AIM

The aim of this paper is to review the potential for, and the limitations of, the use of vignettes in research that seeks an understanding of people's attitudes, perceptions and beliefs, particularly with regard to sensitive subjects such as health care.

BACKGROUND

Vignettes, in the form of text or pictures presented to research participants to prompt responses to interview questions, are widely used throughout the social sciences although their use in nursing research is less developed. REVIEW FOCUS: This review paper begins by addressing the differences between vignettes and real life processes. The following sections explore some of the practical advantages and pitfalls of using vignettes in social and nursing research.

CONCLUSION

The paper demonstrates how vignettes can be very useful research tools yielding valuable data when studying people's attitudes, perceptions and beliefs in social and nursing research.