Women and the heterosexual transmission of HIV: risks and prevention strategies

Subject to Romance

Safer sex campaigns directed at heterosexuals have increasingly targeted women to encourage them to take responsibility for condom use. It appears, however, that many women are unable or unwilling to accept this role. In this article we report on one particular kind of obstacle that some women face in initiating condom use. We draw on data from interviews with 14 women, aged 22 to 43 years, about their experiences with, and views of, condoms. There was considerable variability, as well as commonalities, among the women interviewed in the way they regarded condoms. Using a feminist poststructuralist form of discourse analysis, we explored two women's accounts of being unable to initiate condom use despite their stated intentions not to have intercourse without a condom and having condoms in their possession. We suggest that this particular dynamic results from the passivity women can experience through being positioned in a discourse of heterosexual feminine sexuality in general and a discourse of heterosexual romance in particular. We discuss how this passivity can be experienced by women who are

One love: explicit monogamy agreements among heterosexual young adult couples at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections

HIV prevention strategies among couples include condom use, mutual monogamy, and HIV testing. Research suggests that condom use is more likely with new or casual partners, and tends to decline as relationships become steady over time. Little is known, however, about explicit mutual monogamy agreements and HIV testing within heterosexual couples. This study used data from 434 young heterosexual couples at increased risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) to assess (a) couple concordance on perceptions of a monogamy agreement, sustained monogamy, and HIV testing; and (b) the associations of relationship and demographic factors with monogamy agreement, sustained monogamy, and HIV testing. Results indicated only slight to fair agreement within couples on measures of monogamy agreement and sustained monogamy. Overall, 227 couples (52%) concurred that they had an explicit agreement to be monogamous; of those, 162 (71%) had sustained the agreement. Couples with greater health protective communication and commitment were more likely to have a monogamy agreement. Couples of Latino and Hispanic ethnicity and those with children were less likely to have a monogamy agreement. Only commitment was related to sustained monogamy. Having children, greater health protective communication, and perceived vulnerability to HIV and STIs were associated with HIV testing within the couple.

The impact of migration on HIV prevention for women: constructing a conceptual framework

There are an estimated 40.5 million people currently living with HIV globally, 17.5 million of whom are women, according to the AIDS Epidemic update: December 2005, conducted by UNAIDS and the World Health Organization (WHO) 2005. Women are vulnerable to HIV for biologic as well as social reasons. In the past, the HIV prevention theorists have not considered the context of women's lives: factors at the individual, relationship, and community levels, as well as structural factors (both policy and cultural) impact on HIV prevention for women. This is particularly true for migrant women, who may be especially vulnerable to HIV infection during their time of transition. Throughout this article I explore the international literature for both the historical context of HIV prevention for women and the impact of migration on HIV risk for women. The literature review provides a basis for the development of a conceptual framework of the socioecologic factors affecting HIV prevention for migrant women. I call for consideration of the broad context of women's experience when developing interventions for this population.

Sexual protective strategies of late adolescent females: more than just condoms

OBJECTIVE

To identify the sexual protective strategies of late adolescent heterosexual women.

DESIGN

Open-ended questioning regarding sexual protective strategies was included in a larger cross-sectional survey on sexual risk. Participants' responses were recorded verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

234 African American, Hispanic/ Latina, and non-Hispanic white 19- to 21-year-old females were recruited from the driver's license records of a mid-Atlantic state.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants responded to the open-ended question, "How or what do you do to reduce your risk for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV?"

RESULTS

Seven primary sexual protective strategies were identified from participants' responses: using condoms, abstaining or postponing sexual intercourse, getting tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), selecting safe partners, negotiating condom use, talking about sexual risk histories, and limiting the number of sexual partners.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the sexual protective strategies identified by study participants were less than effective and left young women vulnerable to infection with HIV and STDs. In addition, the use of these alternative strategies may leave young women feeling less at risk and thus less likely to use other more effective strategies such as condoms. The implications for nursing practice and the assessment of the sexual protective strategies of young heterosexual women are discussed.

The sexual behaviors of African American women living with HIV disease: is perceived HIV status altering sexual behavior?

The purpose of the study was to compare the sexual risk behaviors of heterosexual African American women living with HIV disease to women who perceive themselves to be HIV negative using a comparative descriptive design. Data were collected using a demographics questionnaire developed by the investigator and the Safe Sex Behavior Questionnaire (SSBQ). The HIV-positive sample was collected in two public service agencies that provide case management for HIV-positive individuals. The HIV-negative sample was collected in the surrounding community, populated primarily by low-income African Americans. The HIV-positive group demonstrated lower levels of income and education. Scores on the SSBQ indicated no statistical difference between the high-risk sexual behaviors of the HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups. No statistically significant difference was found in the reported past sexual experiences of the two groups, although mean SSBQ scores were higher in the HIV-positive group. The levels of sexual behaviors in both groups were consistent with the high-risk sexual behaviors of HIV-negative persons reported in the literature. This illustrates the need for nursing as a profession to improve programs directed toward altering the behaviors of those at high risk of contracting or transmitting HIV disease.