1
|
Goedeke S, Gamble H, Thurlow R. Extended families? Contact expectations and experiences of egg donors donating to previously unknown recipients. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:1519-1529. [PMID: 38092670 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2023.2292592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
In New Zealand egg donation is identity-release, and donors may be known to recipients, e.g. family members/friends, or previously unknown e.g. clinic-recruited or sourced through advertising. In the case of unknown donors, New Zealand practice allows donors and recipients to meet face-to-face prior to donation in a joint counselling meeting. While contact details may not necessarily be exchanged in counselling, information-exchange and contact expectations are usually addressed. In previous papers, we explored donors' motivations and experiences of donation. In this paper, we explore donors' ideas around their role in relation to the donor-conceived person (DCP) and their expectations and experiences of information-exchange and contact. While donors did not see themselves as parents and were aware of appropriate boundaries, they described a sense of ongoing connection to DCP, often framing this in extended family terms. They desired to be kept informed about DCP, considered themselves 'on standby' for information requests or in-person contact and valued the opportunity for connection between their children and DCP. Donors were, however, cognisant of the limits to their ability to ensure information-exchange and contact and sometimes struggled with their perceived disempowered position. Meeting prior to donation may both clarify and reinforce expectations of information-exchange and contact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Heather Gamble
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Thurlow
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caughey LE, White KM, Lensen S, Peate M. Elective egg freezers' disposition decisions: a qualitative study. Fertil Steril 2023:S0015-0282(23)00151-6. [PMID: 37032273 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the factors that influence elective egg freezers' disposition decisions toward their surplus-frozen oocytes. DESIGN Qualitative. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Thirty-one participants: 7 past; 6 current; and 18 future oocyte disposition decision-makers. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS Six inter-related themes were identified related to the decision-making process which are as follows: decisions are dynamic; triggers for the final decision; achieving motherhood; conceptualization of oocytes; the impacts of egg donation on others; and external factors affecting the final disposition outcome. All women reported a type of trigger event for making a final decision (e.g., completing their family). Women who achieved motherhood were more open to donating their oocytes to others but were concerned about the implications for their child and felt responsibility for potential donor children. Women who did not achieve motherhood were unlikely to donate to others due to the grief of not becoming a mother, often feeling alone, misunderstood, and unsupported. Reclaiming oocytes (e.g., taking them home) and closure ceremonies helped some women process their grief. Donating to research was viewed as an altruistic option as oocytes would not be wasted and did not have the "complication" of a genetically-linked child. There was a general lack of knowledge around disposition options at all stages of the process. CONCLUSION(S) Oocyte disposition decisions are dynamic and complex for women, exacerbated by a general lack of understanding of these options. The final decision is framed by: whether women achieved motherhood, dealing with grief if they did not achieve motherhood, and considering the complexities of donating to others. Additional decision support through counseling, decision aids, and early consideration of disposition when eggs are initially stored may help women make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Katherine M White
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hutchinson AP, Hosakoppal S, Trotter KA, Confino R, Zhang J, Klock SC, Lawson AK, Pavone ME. Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:1619-1624. [PMID: 35587300 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02518-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the frozen oocyte disposition preferences of patients undergoing medical and planned fertility preservation. METHODS All oocyte cryopreservation (OC) patients were identified between 2015 and 2018. Demographic information and fertility preservation (FP) indication (medical or planned) were identified for each patient. Oocyte disposition options included disposal, donation to research, or donation to a specified third party, which was decided at the time of initial consent and made available in the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the disposition selection. Secondary outcomes included differences in demographic variables and disposition selections between medical and planned FP patients using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS A total of 336 OC patients with a documented oocyte disposition preference were identified in the study timeframe. Patients were on average 34.5 years old (SD = 5.1) and were predominantly White (70.2%), nulliparous (83.0%), with a BMI of 24.7 (SD = 5.4). A total of 101 patients underwent OC for medical FP and 235 for planned FP. In both groups, the most commonly selected disposition option was donation to research (50% planned, 52% medical), followed by donation to a specified third party (30% planned, 30% medical), and finally disposal of oocytes (20% planned, 18% medical). There were no significant differences in disposition selection between each group. When comparing patient variables between groups, medical FP patients were more likely to be under the age of 35 and were less likely to be nulliparous (p < .001). CONCLUSION This study shows that oocyte disposition choices are similar in patients undergoing OC for medical and planned indications. As donation to research was the most commonly selected option in both groups, it is time to start thinking of streamlining ways to utilize this potential research material in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne P Hutchinson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Shweta Hosakoppal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Kathryn A Trotter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Rafael Confino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - John Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Susan C Klock
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Angela K Lawson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mary Ellen Pavone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St Clair, Suite 2310, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bühler N. The making of 'old eggs': the science of reproductive ageing between fertility and anti-ageing technologies. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2022; 14:169-181. [PMID: 35024473 PMCID: PMC8732751 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This article proposes going back in the history of reproductive medicine to shed light on the role of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the making of 'old eggs'. Focusing on two key technologies - egg donation and cytoplasmic transfer - both of which contributed significantly to the production of scientific knowledge about reproductive ageing, the article suggests that ART can be analysed as 'in-vivo models' playing a pivotal role in the shift from age as a demographic variable to ageing understood in biological terms. It will shed light on the role of ART in locating age in the eggs and producing a cellular understanding of fertility decline. It argues that ART not only offers new means of reconfiguring the biological clock by extending fertility, but also reconfigures the biology of reproductive ageing itself. This becomes both the target and the means for new technological interventions, imaginaries and norms, anchored in women's bodies and a more plastic biology, and thereby illuminates hitherto underexplored aspects of the encounter between the science and technology of reproduction and anti-ageing.
Collapse
|
5
|
Caughey LE, Lensen S, White KM, Peate M. Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:1601-1619. [PMID: 34452749 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the disposition outcomes and disposition intentions of elective egg freezers (EEFs) toward their surplus frozen oocytes and the psychosocial determinants underlying these. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Actual EEFs (women with oocytes in storage), potential EEFs (women investigating elective oocyte cryopreservation or about to freeze their oocytes), and women of reproductive age (women in the community aged ≥18 years). INTERVENTION(S) A systematic review was undertaken and electronically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO on the Ovid platform for conference abstracts and peer-reviewed articles, published in English after January 1, 2010. A search strategy combined synonyms for oocyte, cryopreservation, donation, disposition, elective, and attitude. Eligible studies assessed disposition outcomes (how an oocyte was disposed of) and disposition intentions (how women intend to dispose of an oocyte) and/or the psychosocial determinants underlying disposition outcomes and intentions. The Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis using random effects was applied to pool proportions of women with similar disposition intentions toward their oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Disposition outcomes and intentions toward surplus frozen oocytes: donate to research; donate to others; discard; unsure. Psychosocial determinants (beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators) of disposition outcomes and intentions. RESULT(S) A total of 3,560 records were identified, of which 22 (17 studies) met the inclusion criteria (8 studies from Europe, 7 from North America, and 2 from Asia). No studies reported on past oocyte disposition outcomes. Seventeen studies reported on the future disposition intentions of 5,446 women. Only 2 of the 17 studies reported on the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition intentions. There was substantial heterogeneity in the pooled results, which was likely a result of the significant variation in methodology. Actual EEFs were included in eight studies (n = 873), of whom 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-63; I2, 87%) would donate surplus oocytes to research, 31% (95% CI, 23-40; I2, 72%) were unsure, 26% (95% CI, 17-38; I2, 92%) would donate to others, and 12% (95% CI, 6-21; I2, 88%) would discard their eggs. Psychosocial determinants: One study reported that 50% of these women were aware of friends and/or family having difficulty conceiving, which may have contributed to their willingness to donate to others. Potential EEFs were included in 4 studies (n = 645), of whom 38% (95% CI, 28-50; I2, 84%) would donate to research, 32% (95% CI, 17-51; I2, 91%) would donate to others, 29% (95% CI, 17-44; I2, 89%) would discard, and 7% (95% CI, 1-27; I2, 77%) were unsure. Psychosocial determinants: No studies. Women of reproductive age were included in 5 studies (n = 3,933), of whom 59% (95% CI, 48-70; I2, 97%) would donate to research and 46% (95% CI, 35-57; I2, 98%) would donate to others. "Unsure" and "discard" were not provided as response options. Psychosocial determinants: One study reported that the facilitators for donation to others included a family member or friend in need, to help others create a family, financial gain, to further science, and control or input over the selection of recipients. Barriers for donation included fear of having a biological child they do not know or who is raised by someone they know. CONCLUSION(S) No studies reported on the disposition outcomes of past EEFs. Disposition intentions varied across the three groups; however, "donating to research" was the most common disposition preference. Notably, the second disposition preference for one-third of actual EEFs was "unsure" and for one-third of potential EEFs was "donate to others." There were limited studies for actual and potential EEFs, and only two studies that explored the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition intentions. Additionally, these data suggest that disposition decisions change as women progress on their egg freezing journey, highlighting the importance of ongoing contact with the fertility team as intentions may change over time. More research is needed to understand the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition decisions so fertility clinics can provide EEFs with the support and information they need to make informed decisions about their stored eggs and reduce the level of uncertainty reported among EEFs and the potential risk of psychological distress and regret. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020202733.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine M White
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hogan RG, Hammarberg K, Wang AY, Sullivan EA. ‘Battery hens’ or ‘nuggets of gold’: a qualitative study on the barriers and enablers for altruistic egg donation. HUM FERTIL 2021; 25:688-696. [DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1873430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie G. Hogan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Nursing, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Y. Wang
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A. Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lima NS. Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2018; 15:57-70. [PMID: 29234993 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9823-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In the last few decades, assisted reproduction has introduced new challenges to the way people conceive and build their families. While the numbers of donor-conceived (DC) individuals have increased worldwide, there are still many controversies concerning access to donor information. Is there a fundamental moral right to know one's genetic background? What does identity in DC families mean? Is there any relationship between identity formation and disclosure of genetic origins? These questions are addressed by analysing core regulatory discourse (ethical recommendations and codes of practice). This analysis shows that the notion of narrative identity is suitable for defining and answering these questions. This review analyses the meaning of resemblance in DC families and the way donors are selected following affinity-ties and discusses disclosure strategies and agreements. As a preliminary conclusion, it could be said that, in the field of third-party reproduction, knowing about the donor conception significantly contributes towards the development of a narrative identity and also serves as a moral basis for the child's right to know.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natacha Salomé Lima
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicología, Práctica Profesional 824 El Rol del Psicólogo en el Ámbito de las Tecnologías de Reproducción Humana Asistida, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Investigaciones en Psicología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bakker MR, Maas J, Bekker MH, Bredenoord AL, Fauser BC, Bos AM. Autonomy and self-esteem of women who donate to an oocyte cryopreservation bank in the Netherlands. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35:225-231. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
9
|
Goedeke S, Daniels K, Thorpe M, du Preez E. The Fate of Unused Embryos: Discourses, Action Possibilities, and Subject Positions. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2017; 27:1529-1540. [PMID: 28728530 DOI: 10.1177/1049732316686759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) has offered hope to those struggling with infertility, it has also had some unintended consequences, including the fate of embryos that may be "surplus" to requirement following IVF treatment. The number of embryos in storage across the world is high, creating a dilemma for patients who need to make disposal decisions, as well as presenting an administrative and practical dilemma for clinics. Research has suggested that patients' views of the status of their embryo/s may affect their disposal decisions, and yet the nature of the links between views of the embryo and decisions to either donate or discard remain unclear. In this article, we engage in a discursive analysis of literature on disposal decisions. We discuss the range of ways in which embryos may be constructed, and demonstrate how these discourses make available or constrain particular action possibilities, and offer particular subject positions for patients. The analysis highlights the complexity of the relationship between embryo status and decision making, and may assist clinicians in supporting and guiding patients' decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- 1 Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ken Daniels
- 2 University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Mark Thorpe
- 1 Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goedeke S, Daniels K. The Discourse of Gifting in Embryo Donation: The Understandings of Donors, Recipients, and Counselors. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2017; 27:1402-1411. [PMID: 27738257 DOI: 10.1177/1049732316672646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In New Zealand, embryo donation (ED) is "open," allowing offspring to access genetic information. Donors and recipients meet prior to donation. Drawing on interviews with 15 recipients, 22 donors, and nine counselors, this article discusses how ED may be constructed as a form of gifting. This discourse may evoke expectations that recipients will express gratitude for the gift, including through honoring contact agreements. Donation becomes a relational practice of obligations and counter-obligations. However, the gift discourse may not adequately capture the emotional sacrifice experienced by donors. Donors describe significant attachment to their embryos, ambiguity about relinquishment, and interest in offsprings' welfare. Furthermore, embryos may be constructed as inalienable bodily gifts resulting in children with whom the donors share immutable social ties. A discourse of ED as mutual exchange, collaboration, and extended family building may be more useful to donors and recipients in managing ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- 1 Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ken Daniels
- 2 University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Acharya S, Bryant L, Twiddy M. Altruism or obligation? The motivations and experience of women who donate oocytes to known recipients in assisted conception treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 38:4-11. [PMID: 28136000 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2016.1233171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This qualitative study was conducted to explore the motivations and experience of oocyte donors donating to women known to them. METHODS Three women who donated oocytes to a close relative were interviewed and data were analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis approach. RESULTS The two key elements noted were "motivations for donation" and "coping with the consequences of oocyte donation". The motivation for donation was influenced by the familial bond that was strengthened by the donation process in some cases. The concept of altruistic oocyte donation stemmed from the narratives of giving the gift of motherhood and gaining a positive self-image and respect from others. Coping with the consequences of oocyte donation tests the donor identity, their wishes for a positive outcome, concerns regarding disclosure of biological motherhood and detachment from the egg and potential child. DISCUSSION Motivation is influenced by a combination of factors including the rewards of altruistic behaviour, the existence and potential strengthening of the relationship between donor and recipient, but possibly also, a sense of obligation and societal expectations. Oocyte donation can be variously viewed by donors as a unique way of reproductive empowerment or an example of acceding to subtle coercion and thus disempowerment. The study also highlights the clinical as well as ethical importance of providing support services for oocyte donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santanu Acharya
- a Ayrshire Fertility Unit , University Hospital Crosshouse , Kilmarnock , Scotland, UK
| | - Louise Bryant
- b Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK
| | - Maureen Twiddy
- b Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22:450-65. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
13
|
Hertz R, Nelson MK, Kramer W. Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors. Soc Sci Med 2015; 147:10-9. [PMID: 26520059 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Revised: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
This paper compares three groups of gestational mothers who relied on gametes from donors they did not know. The three groups are women who have conceived with donor sperm and their own eggs, women who have conceived with donor eggs and a partner's sperm, and women who have conceived with embryos composed of both donor eggs and donor sperm. The paper explores three issues. First, it considers whether intending parents select sperm and egg donors for different attributes both when they are chosen as the only donor and when they are chosen as donors contributing to an entire embryo. Second, it examines how women imagine the donor. Finally, it looks at how women conceptualize the donor as an individual who contributes to their child's characteristics. Two significant findings emerged in this analysis of survey data. First, the data show that gametes are gendered with different attributes both when those gametes are separate and even more so when seen as complementary parts of a whole. Second, the data show that women minimize the impact of the egg donor (both when a sole contribution and especially when part of the complementary whole) and thus ignore the influence or impact of the egg donor relative to how they make sense of the influence or impact of the sperm donor. The data for this study comes from an online survey developed by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna Hertz
- Department of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
| | - Margaret K Nelson
- Department of Sociology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
| | - Wendy Kramer
- Donor Sibling Registry, Box 1571, Nederland, CO 80466, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bühler N. Ovules vieillissants, mères sans âge? Infertilité féminine et recours au don d’ovocytes en Suisse. ENFANCES, FAMILLES, GÉNÉRATIONS 2014. [DOI: 10.7202/1025958ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cette contribution1 examine l’impact des possibilités d’extension de la fertilité féminine ouvertes par le don d’ovocytes sur les significations de l’« âge limite de la maternité », dans le contexte suisse où cette technique est interdite. En me focalisant sur les expériences de femmes recourant au don d’ovocytes en cas d’infertilité liée à l’âge, je montrerai comment cette technique ouvre un espace de contestation et de négociation des limites biologiques de la fertilité. La première partie examine l’utilisation des normes biologiques et statistiques du déclin de la fertilité dans le cadre du diagnostic; la deuxième montre comment les significations des limites d’âge se transforment au fil du parcours de procréation médicalement assistée (PMA); la troisième met en lumière quelques stratégies utilisées pour reconfigurer l’« horloge biologique ».
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolwenn Bühler
- Doctorante, Département d’anthropologie sociale et culturelle, Université de Zurich (Suisse)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kirkman M, Bourne K, Fisher J, Johnson L, Hammarberg K. Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:731-8. [PMID: 24549216 PMCID: PMC3949499 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the expectations and experiences of anonymous gamete donors about contact with their donor offspring? SUMMARY ANSWER Rather than consistently wanting to remain distant from their donor offspring, donors' expectations and experiences of contact with donor offspring ranged from none to a close personal relationship. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Donor conception is part of assisted reproduction in many countries, but little is known about its continuing influence on gamete donors' lives. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A qualitative research model appropriate for understanding participants' views was employed; semi-structured interviews were conducted during January–March 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Before 1998, gamete donors in Victoria, Australia, were subject to evolving legislation that allowed them to remain anonymous or (from 1988) to consent to the release of identifying information. An opportunity to increase knowledge of donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring recently arose in Victoria when a recommendation was made to introduce mandatory identification of donors on request from their donor offspring, with retrospective effect. Pre-1998 donors were invited through an advertising campaign to be interviewed about their views, experiences and expectations; 36 sperm donors and 6 egg donors participated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE This research is unusual in achieving participation by donors who would not normally identify themselves to researchers or government inquiries. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed that most donors did not characterize themselves as parents of their donor offspring. Donors' expectations and experiences of contact with donor offspring ranged from none to a close personal relationship. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION It is not possible to establish whether participants were representative of all pre-1998 donors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Anonymous donors' needs and desires are not homogeneous; policy and practice should be sensitive and responsive to a wide range of circumstances and preferences. Decisions made to restrict or facilitate contact or the exchange of information have ramifications for donors as well as for donor-conceived people. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was funded by the Victorian Department of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Kirkman
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lewis C, Clotworthy M, Hilton S, Magee C, Robertson MJ, Stubbins LJ, Corfield J. Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2013; 3:bmjopen-2013-003056. [PMID: 23929915 PMCID: PMC3740256 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A mixed methods study exploring the UK general public's willingness to donate human biosamples (HBSs) for biomedical research. SETTING Cross-sectional focus groups followed by an online survey. PARTICIPANTS Twelve focus groups (81 participants) selectively sampled to reflect a range of demographic groups; 1110 survey responders recruited through a stratified sampling method with quotas set on sex, age, geographical location, socioeconomic group and ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Identify participants' willingness to donate HBSs for biomedical research, (2) explore acceptability towards donating different types of HBSs in various settings and (3) explore preferences regarding use and access to HBSs. RESULTS 87% of survey participants thought donation of HBSs was important and 75% wanted to be asked to donate in general. Responders who self-reported having some or good knowledge of the medical research process were significantly more likely to want to donate (p<0.001). Reasons why focus group participants saw donation as important included: it was a good way of reciprocating for the medical treatment received; it was an important way of developing drugs and treatments; residual tissue would otherwise go to waste and they or their family members might benefit. The most controversial types of HBSs to donate included: brain post mortem (29% would donate), eyes post mortem (35%), embryos (44%), spare eggs (48%) and sperm (58%). Regarding the use of samples, there were concerns over animal research (34%), research conducted outside the UK (35%), and research conducted by pharmaceutical companies (56%), although education and discussion were found to alleviate such concerns. CONCLUSIONS There is a high level of public support and willingness to donate HBSs for biomedical research. Underlying concerns exist regarding the use of certain types of HBSs and conditions under which they are used. Improved education and more controlled forms of consent for sensitive samples may mitigate such concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shona Hilton
- CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, Glasgow, UK
| | - Caroline Magee
- Confederation of Cancer Biobanks, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mertes H, Pennings G, Dondorp W, de Wert G. Implications of oocyte cryostorage for the practice of oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:2886-93. [PMID: 22802093 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation has increased rapidly in recent years, oocytes are currently being stored either in the course of IVF treatments or as a fertility preservation measure. These practices may have an impact on the number of available donor oocytes due to two different dynamics: first, a certain percentage of women for whom oocytes were cryopreserved will eventually not use their oocytes and may decide to donate them to others; secondly, especially in the practice of social freezing, women may opt to donate a portion of the retrieved oocytes in 'freeze-and-share' schemes in order to reduce the costs. In this article, we aim to sketch the ethical implications of such developments in general and the issue of payment to oocyte donors in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blyth E, Yee S, Tsang AKT. “They Were My Eggs; They Were Her Babies”: Known Oocyte Donors’ Conceptualizations of Their Reproductive Material. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2011; 33:1134-40. [PMID: 22082787 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35081-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Blyth
- University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bahadur G, Morrison M, Machin L. Beyond the 'embryo question': human embryonic stem cell ethics in the context of biomaterial donation in the UK. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 21:868-74. [PMID: 21112540 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2010] [Revised: 09/30/2010] [Accepted: 10/05/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Discussion about the ethics of human embryonic stem cell (ESC) research in the UK tends to be dominated by the divisive and potentially intractable issue of the moral status of the embryo. This can have the effect of silencing or marginalizing other concerns, especially in the context of public engagement with science in this field. One such area of potential public concern is the donation of oocytes and embryos to stem cell research. Contemporary research on the views of donors and potential donors about a wide range of biomaterials, from solid organs to gametes and bone marrow, is reviewed and used to illustrate the range and types of ethical concerns articulated by this important group of stakeholders. Attitudes to donation are found to vary according to the type of tissue being donated or collected, the purpose for which donation is being sought and the nature of the recipient of the donation. Pertinently, attitudes towards donating oocytes are found to differ in some respects from donation of embryos or fetal tissue. The implications of these findings for ensuring ethically robust informed consent and publicly acceptable sourcing of human biomaterials for stem cell research are then considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Bahadur
- Fertility Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, Stirling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Purewal S, van den Akker O. Attitudes and intention to donate oocytes for research. Fertil Steril 2010; 93:1080-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2008] [Revised: 10/22/2008] [Accepted: 11/15/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
21
|
Purewal S, Vanden Akker O. 'I feel like they were mine and I should be looking after them': an exploration of non-patient women's attitudes towards oocyte donation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 30:215-22. [PMID: 19883292 DOI: 10.3109/01674820903348732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of this study were to qualitatively assess the meaning of oocytes and oocyte donation for treatment and research among non-patient women in the UK using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. This study also assessed the application of components of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) in intentions and attitudes towards oocyte donation. Eight parous and nulliparous women from White and South Asian backgrounds, who reported no fertility problems, were interviewed. Four interrelated super-ordinate themes were identified: (1) oocytes as 'Just a cell' and 'Potential life'; (2) oocyte donation as 'Altruism' and 'Not normal behaviour'; (3) 'Importance of motherhood' and the 'Importance of a genetic link'. Ethnic differences were observed in the final theme (4) which identified the importance of 'Social Support' and 'Reproductive Control' in women's discourses of oocyte donation. Analysis revealed participant's beliefs and thoughts about oocyte donation were complex, interwoven and paradoxical. Previous quantitative studies that have assessed components of the TPB in relation to oocyte donation have failed to identity important alternative explanations of oocyte donation and subtle complexities in attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satvinder Purewal
- Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London NW4 4BT, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Purewal S, van den Akker O. A study of the effect of message framing on oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:3136-43. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Daniels K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: Oocyte donors. HUM FERTIL 2009; 10:223-31. [DOI: 10.1080/14647270701624792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
Purewal S, van den Akker O. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:499-515. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In New Zealand, embryo donation to others was approved in late 2005 and follows strict guidelines. To date, few donations have proceeded. Given the novelty of embryo donation and New Zealand's guidelines around donation, this study explores how potential recipients in New Zealand made meaning of embryo donation. METHODS Thirteen potential recipients were interviewed regarding decision-making around embryo donation. Data were analysed thematically, identifying the major concerns that shaped their perspectives and decision-making regarding embryo donation. RESULTS The concept of genetic lineage emerged as the most important consideration. Participants viewed the embryo as a direct and permanent link between the genetic parents and the child resulting from donation. The genetic link implied ongoing responsibility, interest, care and even ownership. Participants were particularly cognizant of the need for children born from embryo donation to have access to information regarding their heritage. Wider concerns around the quality of the embryo's genetic material were expressed. Neither discarding surplus embryos nor embryo donation was seen as easy options. Participants found embryo donation to be a psychologically and morally complex issue and expressed some caution about pursuing this option. CONCLUSIONS The emphasis on genetic lineage as a priority in decision-making needs to be recognized especially within contexts where guidelines emphasize donor registration and cultures are shaped by open-adoption practices and the importance of knowing one's lineage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Goedeke
- Department of Psychology, Division of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, AUT University, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Hudson N, Culley L, Rapport F, Johnson M, Bharadwaj A. "Public" perceptions of gamete donation: a research review. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2009; 18:61-77. [PMID: 19579535 DOI: 10.1177/0963662507078396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
This paper reviews the literature on "public" perceptions of the practice of gamete (egg and sperm) donation in the treatment of infertility. Despite regular "consultation" exercises in the UK on the manner in which infertility treatments should be regulated, there is little sense of how a range of public groups respond to developments in this area. The key themes from thirty-three articles, chapters and reports are discussed. The review reveals the limited nature of our current knowledge of public understandings of and attitudes towards gamete donation as a form of infertility treatment which has been readily available and widely practiced for many years. The review is critical of the methodological and epistemological basis of much of the work in this area and argues that there is a strong case for social scientific research to attempt to capture the perceptions of a wider range of people who are rarely included in formal public consultations and often similarly excluded from research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia C. Inhorn
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8277;
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Landau R, Weissenberg R, Madgar I. A child of "hers": older single mothers and their children conceived through IVF with both egg and sperm donation. Fertil Steril 2007; 90:576-83. [PMID: 17919604 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2007] [Revised: 07/03/2007] [Accepted: 07/03/2007] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the decision to have a child alone, the experience of gamete donation, the issue of disclosure of the donor link to the child, conception-related health and sociodemographic characteristics of the mothers, children's socioemotional development, and mother-child relationships. DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING Prior clients of a sperm bank. PARTICIPANT(S) Eleven single women in their late forties who gave birth to children aided by IVF involving both egg and sperm donation, i.e., the children are not genetically related to the mothers. RESULT(S) Not only were there differences among the participants, but they also differed from the only previous study focusing on single women becoming mothers by choice and using advanced reproductive technologies. CONCLUSION(S) Similarly to previous studies, we generally found that the impact of assisted conception on parenting and child development gives no undue cause for concern while the children are still young. However, the young age of the children in our sample prevented us from answering many questions about the children's socioemotional development and about disclosure of donor conception to children born to older single women using double gamete donation and IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Landau
- Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Purewal S, van den Akker OBA. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2006; 64:43-9. [PMID: 16427244 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2005] [Revised: 10/22/2005] [Accepted: 11/04/2005] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the importance of altruism and willingness to donate oocytes in British Asian and Caucasian samples. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was used to test the importance of attitudes towards oocyte donation, normative and control beliefs to attitudes to donate oocytes. METHOD One hundred and one participants (55% Asian, 45% Caucasian) completed questionnaires measuring altruism and attitudes to Oocyte donation. There were no socio-demographic differences between ethnic groups. RESULTS Few women were willing to donate oocytes, Asian women were least likely to donate oocytes, and altruism was not related to willingness to donate. Forty-one participants considered themselves 'possible' oocyte donors and 54 as definite 'non' donors. Possible donors reported significantly more positive attitudes towards egg donation; asking women to donate under various circumstances; to the consequences of donating their eggs; positively experiencing egg donation and to factors that would induce women to donate. Subjective norms and behavioural control also influenced intention to donate. CONCLUSION A number of components of the TPB were able to predict possible oocyte donation, and non-oocyte donation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study provides some empirical support for specific factors influencing cultural differences in gamete donation in the UK. A future culturally appropriate targeted approach to donation education could redress the present imbalance in supply and demand of gametes in infertility treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Purewal
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
van den Akker O. A review of family donor constructs: current research and future directions. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 12:91-101. [PMID: 16172110 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmi038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This review addresses research on gamete donors, recipients, and offspring and demonstrates that the foci on all three within the triad are largely directed at disclosure or anonymity; and each in turn centers on the perceived importance of the genetic link. The importance attached to genetics has led some countries to review the ethics of anonymous gamete donation (e.g. New Zealand's 'open system' of information sharing) and has led other countries (Sweden, Austria, Victoria, Australia; the Netherlands, the UK) to change their laws allowing donor gamete offspring the right to obtain identifying information about their genetic parent. This review demonstrates that genealogical inconsistencies between and within members of the triad are common regardless of legislation. A discussion of future trends and concerns, relating to the use of gamete donation and the effects legislation is likely to have on the donor triads in the UK following 2005, is provided. The review also addresses the importance of testing theoretical models within future research, and argues this would lead to a better understanding of the underlying problems encountered at a psychosocial level, such as continued preference for anonymity in donors and denial in large numbers of users of the involvement of a donor in conception. Lack of disclosure effectively prevents true implementation of legislation; if a child is not informed, it is the result of donated gametes, it cannot take up the legally available option of finding out identifiable information about their genetic parent(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga van den Akker
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|