Lateral condylar fractures of the humerus in children: does the type of fixation matter?

Kirschner wire vs screw osteosynthesis of lateral condyle fractures in paediatric patients: a systematic review

This systematic review compares Kirschner wires versus a single cannulated screw for the treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. The purpose of this review is to review the current literature on fixation of lateral condyle fractures of the humerus, and to ascertain whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes of these fractures when fixated with K-wires vs screws. This systematic review of the literature comparing surgical management of paediatric (0-17 years of age) lateral condyle fractures with K-wire versus screw fixation was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic searches of three databases from inception to March 2022 yielded 17 studies which satisfied inclusion criteria, comprising 1,272 patients with a median age of 8.5 years. Eight hundred and fifty-five (67.2%) patients underwent K-wire fixation and 417 (32.8%) underwent screw fixation. Results were divided into comparative and single-arm studies. The median follow-up time was 23.3 months (range 3 months-22 years). A lateral prominence was observed in 114 (13.3%) patients with K-wires and 41 (9.8%) patients with a cannulated screw. An infection developed in 52 (6.1%) patients with K-wires, while only five (1.2%) patients with a screw developed an infection. A carrying angle deformity occurred in 61 (7.1%) patients with K-wires and seven (1.7%) patients with a screw. K-wires and cannulated screws are effective and safe methods of fixation for lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. K-wire fixation may have a greater incidence of infection but allows for safe non-operative removal and versatility with fractures of greater comminution, while screw fixation necessitates a second operation for removal following union.Level of Evidence III Systematic review.

Management of Acute Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures in Children

Pediatric elbow fractures are quite common, accounting for up to 34% of bone fractures in children. Among these, acute lateral humeral condyle (LHC) fractures represent up to 22%. The accurate diagnosis and early treatment of LHC fractures are crucial due to the potential for abnormal growth and significant long-term impacts on joint motion. With the aim of enhancing the understanding of pediatric LHC fracture management among pediatric healthcare practitioners, we present a literature review combined with our technical recommendations based on our experience. Imaging through AP, lateral, and internal oblique X-rays remains the gold standard for diagnosis, although there is increasing focus on non-irradiating techniques, considering the skeletally immature nature of the patients. Several classification systems aid in fracture assessment, each varying in their simplicity, reproducibility, and inter- and intra-observer correlations. The treatment approaches for LHC fractures include conservative management with immobilization for minimally displaced fractures and surgical intervention for displaced fractures. The surgical options encompass closed and open reductions, using Kirschner wires or cannulated screws for fixation. While both methods show favorable outcomes, recent years have seen a growing interest in expanding the traditional indications for closed approaches. After a period of post-surgical immobilization of the limb, rehabilitation care is recommended to assist in the recovery of the range of motion. During the postoperative period, the most frequent complications are bony overgrowth, malunion, and infection, although with highly variable rates, which typically do not result in functional impairment if managed properly. Regular follow-up and monitoring are essential for optimal recovery and minimizing long-term complications.

Closed Reduction Techniques Are Associated With Fewer Complications Than Open Reductions in Treating Moderately Displaced Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Lateral humeral condyle (LC) fractures are the second most common pediatric elbow fractures. Traditionally, displaced fractures have been treated with open reduction although recent studies have demonstrated successful outcomes of closed reduction for similar injuries. This study investigates the outcomes comparing open and closed reduction in a large cohort of children with moderately displaced (Song classification types 1 to 4) lateral humeral condyle fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective data from patients aged between 1 and 12 years treated for lateral condyle fractures was collected from 6 academic level 1 trauma centers between 2005 and 2019. Data was collected on patient demographics, radiographic parameters, reduction type, type of hardware fixation, and fracture patterns. Complications recorded include infections, reoperations for nonunion, osteonecrosis, and elbow stiffness.

RESULTS

An initial 762 fractures were identified. After excluding Song 5 cases, a total of 480 fractures met inclusion criteria, with 202 (42%) treated with closed reduction and 278 (58%) treated with open reduction. Demographics and injury characteristics were similar across the 2 reduction cohorts. After propensity score matching, delayed healing (52% vs. 28%; OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.97-4.22; P <0.0001) and stiffness (22% vs. 10%; OR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.42-4.13; P =0.0012) were significantly higher in the open reduction group. No differences in the rates of infection or nonunion (3% CR and 1% OR) were noted between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that moderately displaced lateral condyle fractures requiring open reduction are more likely to have elbow stiffness and delayed healing when compared with the ones treated with closed reduction. For these reasons, we propose attempting closed reduction techniques as the first line of treatment in moderately displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures (if anatomic articular reduction can be achieved) to attain better patient outcomes.

Comparison of biodegradable and metallic tension-band fixation for paediatric lateral condyle fracture of the elbow

INTRODUCTION

In our retrospective study we compared the outcomes of paediatric lateral condyle fractures of the elbow fixed by bioabsorbable pins and tension-band sutures or by metallic tension-band with K-wires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the data of children operated on for lateral condyle fractures between 2010 and 2020. Patients were classified as follows: 1. fractures treated with metallic (KW group), 2. fractures treated with resorbable implants (BR group). We compared the distribution of age, sex and fracture type in each group. Operative times of the two techniques were also recorded and compared. We analysed the X-rays taken one year after the injury and measured the following parameters: presence of possible non-union, varus or valgus deviation, lateral spur formation. Patients whose follow-up period was less than one year were excluded. For categorical data, group comparisons were performed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the sample size. The evaluation of discrete variables was performed with Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

42 patients met the above criteria. We found 19 children in the Kirschner -wire + tansion band wire (KW) group and 23 in the Bioresorbable pin + tension band suture (BR) group. There were no significant differences between the study groups in terms of age, sex, left-right ratio, number of complications, operation time, number of Jacobs II and III cases or follow-up time. The operation time was on average 5 min longer in the bioresorbable group (K-wire mean = 62.1 min, Bioresorbable mean = 67 min), this difference, however, is not statistically significant (P = 0.177). In terms of minor and major complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. (P = 0.729).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not notice any difference between the complication rates of the two methods, so the real advantage of the absorbable implant technique is that no second intervention is necessary. The benefits of using biodegradable implants in various osteosynthesis techniques need further confirmation by randomised trials.

Lateral Humeral Condyle Fracture in Childhood: Results of a New Surgical Technique

Fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus are one of the most common fractures in children, accounting for between 10% and 20% of fractures involving the elbow, with a peak incidence at 6 years of age. Treatment is often surgical for displaced fractures > 2 mm, according to Milch and Jakob classification. There is no consensus in the literature about the appropriate surgical management of these fractures. Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe, propose, and evaluate outcomes and complications of the surgical technique of reduction and osteosynthesis using trans-bone suture with resorbable threads. Methods: Patients with lateral condyle fractures treated with this surgical technique from 2015 to 2019 were included in this retrospective study, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. For clinical and functional assessment of the elbow, Mayo Elbow Scores were recorded; we assessed the time of fracture healing, carrying angles, and Baumann angle of the affected limb compared to the healthy contralateral elbow for radiographic data. Complications have also been described. Results: We achieved satisfactory results; 36 patients with lateral condyle fractures were included in this study. Radiological healing was achieved in all cases. There was only one complication. No cases required additional surgical procedures. Almost all patients achieved a complete flexion of 110 degrees or more and complete extension. Conclusions: This surgical technique has good functional outcomes and fracture healing, a lower incidence of complications when compared to other surgical techniques, and no mechanical failure with good clinical and radiological results.

Management of Lateral Condyle Humeral Fracture Associated With Elbow Dislocation in Children. A Retrospective International Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 12% to 17% of all distal humerus fractures in children, and usually occur as an isolated injury or are associated with radial neck and/or proximal ulna fractures. The presentation with a concomitant dislocation of the elbow is rare. Therefore, literature on young patients with this uncommon combination is sparse and mostly limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the present study is to identify the best treatment strategy for this injury, recognize potential risk factors for the development of complications, and identify predictors of outcome.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective review of electronic and written medical records for skeletally immature patients who were diagnosed with a lateral condyle fracture of the humerus associated with elbow dislocation (ED). Data recorded included patient demographics, fracture classification, direction of the dislocation, treatment strategy, time to union, elbow range of motion, complications, and additional procedures. The modified Flynn criteria were used to determine the outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 23 patients who presented to 3 institutions with a concomitant lateral humeral condyle fractures and an ED. The mean age at the time of injury was 8.7 years (range: 6 to 13 y). The median time from injury to surgery was 1 day (interquartile range: 0.5, minimum to maximum: 0 to 29 d). The median follow-up was 24 weeks (interquartile range: 16, minimum to maximum: 4 to 120 wk). The injury occurred more commonly in males (79%) with Weiss type 3 fractures. The direction of the dislocation was posterior or posteromedial in most cases. Open reduction through a modified Kocher lateral approach and fixation with either Kirschner wires (N = 12) or cannulated screws (N = 9) was the preferred method of treatment. Eight patients (34.8%) developed complications, including persistent elbow stiffness (N = 5), elbow instability (N = 1), and avascular necrosis (N = 2). There were no cases of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, heterotopic ossification, neurological injury, or hardware failure. Patients treated with casting or Kirschner wire fixation had a significantly increased rate of elbow stiffness compared with screw fixation (50%, 25%, and 11%, respectively, P = 0.015). According to Flynn's criteria, 65% of the patients had good or excellent outcomes, and 35% had poor.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate a higher than previously described rate of complications in children with lateral condyle humerus fracture associated with ED, including persistent elbow stiffness, avascular necrosis, and chronic elbow instability, leading to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes in over one-third of the cases. Our findings suggest that the internal fixation with screws, combined with a shorter postoperative immobilization period (2 wk) may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic, case series.

K-wire versus screws in the fixation of lateral condyle fracture of humerus in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lateral condyle fracture of the humerus is the second most common elbow fracture in children. Non-displaced lateral condyle fractures can often be managed with cast and conservative care, while reduction and fixation are often used to treat displaced lateral condyle fractures. Traditionally, K-wire fixation has been used for displaced lateral condyle fractures, but recently fixation using screws has been advocated in some studies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the difference in outcomes and complications between the two different fixation methods for the treatment of displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for this review. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used for study selection. Studies comparing K-wires and screw fixation in displaced lateral condyle fractures in pediatric patients were included. Clinical outcomes using the Hardacre criteria, infection, limitation of range of motion of the elbow, lateral condyle overgrowth, delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis were compared. Data were analyzed using the meta package in R version 4.2.2, and random-effects or fixed-effects models were used according to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled study and three retrospective cohort studies were included, with a total of 240 patients (K-wire:118, screw:122). The clinical outcome using the Hardacre criteria was not different between the groups (P = 0.54), but the risk of infection (risk ratio [RR] = 5.52, 95% CI: 1.42-21.48, P = 0.01) and limitation of range of motion (RR = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.54-9.18, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the K-wire fixation group than in screw fixation group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of screws for fixation after reduction in the treatment of lateral condyle fracture of the humerus in children decreases the risk of superficial infection and elbow stiffness compared with the use of K-wire. Although removal of the implant under general anesthesia is necessary, screw fixation can be considered in displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42023415643).

Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures in Pediatric Patients

Lateral humeral condyle fractures are frequently seen in pediatric patients and have a high risk of unfavorable outcomes. A fall on the outstretched arm with supination of the forearm is the most common trauma mechanism. A physical examination combined with additional imaging will confirm the diagnosis. Several classifications have been described to categorize these fractures based on location and comminution. Treatment options depend on the severity of the fracture and consist of immobilization in a cast, closed reduction with percutaneous fixation, and open reduction with fixation. These fractures can lead to notable complications such as lateral condyle overgrowth, surgical site infection, pin tract infections, stiffness resulting in decreased range of motion, cubitus valgus deformities, 'fishtail' deformities, malunion, non-union, avascular necrosis, and premature epiphyseal fusion. Adequate follow-up is therefore warranted.

K Wires or Cannulated Screws for Fixation of Lateral Condyle Fractures in Children: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Introduction

Lateral condyle fractures in children have been typically been treated operatively using Kirschner wires (K wire) or cannulated screws (CCS); however, a definitive choice of implant remains a matter of debate. This systematic review aims to determine if union and functional outcomes of these fractures are better with screw fixation.

Methodology

A search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Google scholar was performed in March 2021. The results were screened by title and abstract, and relevance and a quality assessment of the data were performed for the articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Articles comparing radiological and functional outcomes of lateral condyle fractures treated with K wires or screws were included for examination. Articles were excluded if they did not compare outcomes of K wires and CCS together, or were in a language other than English, technical notes, case reports, and articles, which describe the use of fixation methods other than K wire or CCS as well as biomechanical studies were also excluded. Risk of bias and quality assessment of included articles were also done.

Results

Seven clinical studies were included. 44.4% (n = 4) were retrospective review of records with level III evidence (77.7%, n = 7). Only two included articles had good-quality assessment scores. Union was reported in 85.7% % in K wire group and 99.6% in CCS group. Functional outcomes were not statistically significant between the two groups.

Conclusion

Using screws to fix lateral condyle provides better union; however, there is no difference in the functional outcomes and complication rate between the two. Using screws or buried K wires adds the burden of an additional procedure for removal.

K-wire Versus Screw Fixation in Displaced Lateral Condyle Fractures of the Humerus in Children: A Multicenter Study of 762 Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 12% to 20% of all distal humerus fractures in the pediatric population. When surgery is indicated, fixation may be achieved with either Kirschner-wires or screws. The literature comparing the outcomes of these 2 different fixation methods is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to compare both the complication and union rates of these 2 forms of operative treatment in a multicenter cohort of children with lateral humeral condyle fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed across 6 different institutions. Data were retrospectively collected preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the type of initial treatment: K-wire fixation and screw fixation. Statistical comparisons between these 2 cohorts were performed with an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 762 patients included in this study, 72.6% (n=553) of which were treated with K-wire fixation. The mean duration of immobilization was 5 weeks in both cohorts, and most patients in this study demonstrated radiographic healing by 11 weeks postoperatively, regardless of treatment method. Similar reoperation rates were seen among those treated with K-wires and screws (5.6% vs. 4.3%, P =0.473). Elbow stiffness requiring further intervention with physical therapy was significantly more common in those treated with K-wires compared with children treated with screws (21.2% vs. 13.9%, P =0.023) as was superficial skin infection (3.8% vs. 0%, P =0.002), but there was no significant difference in nonunion rates between the two groups (2.4% vs. 1.3%, P =1.000).

CONCLUSION

We found similar success rates between K-wire and screw fixation in this patient population. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find evidence that treatment with screw fixation decreases the likelihood of experiencing nonunion. However, given the unique complications associated with K-wire fixation, such as elbow stiffness and superficial skin infection, the treatment with screw fixation remains a reasonable alternative to K-wire fixation in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Comparação entre fixação de fio de Kirschner liso e de parafusos canulados em fraturas deslocadas do côndilo lateral do úmero em crianças

Objetivo Comparar o uso de parafusos canulados e de fios de Kirschner lisos em termos da redução da presença de calo exuberante e de complicações em fraturas pediátricas deslocadas do côndilo lateral do úmero.

Métodos Um estudo analítico transversal de casos consecutivos foi realizado de maio a outubro de 2021 com 30 crianças com fraturas deslocadas de côndilo umeral externo. Os resultados funcionais para dor e amplitude de movimento foram estratificados utilizando o sistema de classificação Dhillon.

Resultados Ao todo, 19 pacientes foram submetidos à fixação de fio Kirschner, e 11 à fixação de parafusos canulados. A fixação realizada foi fechada em 14 casos (47%) e aberta em 16 (53%). Dos casos incluídos, não houve perda no acompanhamento. A amostra continha 21 (70%) pacientes do sexo masculino, e a idade variou de 5 a 15 anos, com média de 6,96 anos. A causa mais frequente de fratura foi queda de altura (50%), e esteve relacionada ao maior deslocamento nas radiografias da linha de base. Complicações que não estavam relacionadas à abordagem de redução ou ao implante utilizado foram observadas em 12 (40%) casos.

Conclusão Este estudo não mostra benefícios em relação ao uso de pinos lisos ou de parafusos canulados para reduzir a presença de calo exuberante na consolidação da fratura. Vemos que as complicações que surgem estão relacionadas à gravidade da lesão, e não é possível identificar benefícios na escolha de um implante ou outro. Pudemos ver que a classificação de Weiss ajuda a definir o comportamento em favor da redução aberta ou fechada sem dar preferência ao pino liso ou ao parafuso canulado para a fixação da fratura.

Open reduction of pediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Lateral condyle fractures are the second most common pediatric elbow fracture. There exist multiple options for internal fixation including buried K-wires, unburied K-wires, and screw fixation. Our study aims to review the current literature and determine if fixation strategy affects outcomes to include fracture union, postoperative range of motion, and need subsequent surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was performed. Included articles involve pediatric patients with displaced lateral condyle fractures treated with internal fixation that reported outcomes to include union rates and complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria for a total of 1299 patients (472 buried K-wires, 717 unburied K-wires, and 110 screws). The patients' average age was 5.8 ± 0.6 years, male (64%), and had 16.3 months of follow-up. No differences in union and infection rates were found. Unburied K-wires had the shortest time to union and the greatest elbow range of motion postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review demonstrates similar outcomes with union and infection rates between all fixation techniques. Unburied K-wires demonstrated a shorter time to union and the greatest postoperative range of motion. Additionally, unburied K-wires may be removed in clinic, decreasing the cost on the healthcare system.

EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Patient-reported outcomes after operative versus nonoperative treatment of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures

Lateral humeral condyle fractures in children are treated with several approaches, yet it is unclear which has the best treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that functional outcomes would be equivalent between treatment types, reduction approaches, and fixation types. Our purpose was to assess patient-reported outcomes and complications by treatment type (operative versus nonoperative), reduction approach (open versus percutaneous), and fixation type (cannulated screws versus Kirschner wires).We retrospectively reviewed data from acute lateral humeral condyle fractures treated at our level-1 pediatric trauma center from 2008 to 2017. Patients were included if they were 8 years or older and had completed clinical follow-up. Fractures were categorized by fracture severity as mild (<2-mm displacement), moderate (isolated, 2- to 5-mm displacement), or severe (isolated, >5-mm displacement or >2-mm displacement with concomitant elbow dislocation or other elbow fracture). We extracted data on patient age, sex, treatment type, reduction approach, fixation type, patient-reported outcomes (shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System upper extremity), treatment complications, and follow-up duration. Patients in the operative versus nonoperative group and across fracture severity subgroups did not differ significantly by age, sex, or follow-up duration. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine whether outcomes differed by intervention. Alpha = 0.05.No differences were observed in patient-reported outcomes between operative versus nonoperative groups for the mild and severe fracture subgroups. No differences were observed between approach (open versus percutaneous) or instrumentation (cannulated screw versus Kirschner wire fixation) for any outcome measure within the operative group. Patients whose fractures were stabilized with screws versus wires had significantly higher rates of return to the operating room (94% versus 8.3%, P < .001). The overall complication rate for our cohort was low, with no differences by treatment type or fracture severity.In our cohort, patient-reported outcomes were similar across fracture severity categories, irrespective of treatment or fixation type. Patients who underwent internal fixation with cannulated screws experienced significantly higher rates of return to the operating room compared with those treated with Kirschner wires but otherwise had similar complication rates and patient-reported outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.

Lateral Condyle Fracture of the Humerus in Children: Kirschner Wire or Screw Fixation?

INTRODUCTION

 The treatment of the displaced fracture of the lateral condyle of the distal humerus in children aims not only to avoid nonunion, malalignment, and impairment of the range of motion of the elbow but also to prevent delayed healing and the development of any prearthrotic deformity. To date there is no agreement on what kind of osteosynthesis should be used. So far, the screw fixation and Kirschner wire fixation have both been applied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the outcome of these two methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study was undertaken including 43 patients aged 2 to 13 years who underwent osteosynthesis for a condylar fracture of the humerus over a period of 10 years. The electronic archive, including the radiological diagnostics, was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0. Statistical significance was set at an α level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS

 Kirschner wire fixation was performed in 48.9% of condylar fractures of the humerus while screw fixation (alone or in combination with a pin) was assessed with a percentage of 51.1% of the cases in this study. Screw fixation only was applied in 20.9% of fractures of the lateral condyle. The selection of the method was independent of the age of the patient (p = 0.2). The comparison of the rate of complications and an impaired range of motion after Kirschner wire osteosynthesis to the rate after screw osteosynthesis showed a significantly lower percentage for the Kirschner wire group (p = 0.046). No case of nonunion, nerve palsy, or pin migration was detected in any patient in this study.

CONCLUSION

 Kirschner wire fixation of condylar humeral fractures in children resulted in a lower rate of complications than screw fixation. No case of nonunion of the fracture was found in the patients that we investigated so that we conclude that Kirschner wires sufficiently adapt the fracture in these cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 Level III.

Open Reduction and Pin Fixation of Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condylar Fractures

Background

Lateral condylar fractures of the humerus are the second most common elbow fracture seen in pediatrics, behind supracondylar humeral fractures. All practicing orthopaedic surgeons should be able to identify and treat these injuries appropriately, as the intra-articular and transphyseal nature of this fracture pattern contributes to the relatively high complication rate. Treatment has evolved with time as classification systems better characterize the different types of lateral condylar fractures, aiding in decision-making for management. This video article reviews the diagnostic findings and classification systems for lateral condylar fractures and then details the surgical technique for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced lateral condylar fractures.

Description

Position the patient supine with the arm extended on a hand table with a sterile tourniquet. Center the incision over the capitellum. Follow the rent in the fascia to the fracture. Open the capsule anteriorly to view across the joint, avoiding excess posterior dissection to protect the blood supply. Clear soft tissue from the anterior surface of the fracture fragment, which will allow visualization of the fragment without excessive posterior dissection. Using a long retractor anteriorly to maintain visualization of the articular surface, reduce the fracture with a valgus force. Insert 2 pins percutaneously posterior to the incision. One pin should be parallel to the joint surface; the other should diverge >45° and fixate the medial metaphysis. Confirm reduction by direct visualization as well as by anteroposterior, lateral, and internal oblique radiographs. Cut and bend the pins outside the skin and close the incision with absorbable suture. Apply a long-arm cast.

Alternatives

Nonoperative management is reserved for fractures with <2 mm of displacement. Closed reduction can be attempted for fractures with 2 to 4 mm of displacement. Screw fixation may be utilized in some cases.

Rationale

Management of fractures displaced 2 to 4 mm is controversial and surgeon-dependent. Although cast immobilization for these fractures has been reported historically as successful¹, close follow-up is required as these fractures can have late displacement. Many authors have a low threshold for operative intervention if close follow-up cannot be guaranteed or if there is concern for increasing displacement². Both closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with an arthrogram and open reduction with direct visualization and fixation are acceptable treatment methods³. There is consensus that surgery is warranted for a displaced lateral condylar fracture with malrotation or articular incongruity. Although there is 1 report of percutaneous reduction and fixation in substantially displaced fractures⁴, most surgeons perform open reduction with either pin or lag screw fixation for fractures displaced >4 mm. Although lag screw fixation is biomechanically superior⁵ and has higher union rates^6,7 and lower infection rates⁸, a second surgery is necessary for implant removal because of growth concerns⁹.

Expected Outcomes

Bone union and good clinical results can be obtained in children with a lateral condylar fracture¹⁰. Lateral overgrowth in the form of a "lateral spur" and cubitus valgus are the most common residual deformities seen¹⁰. Nonunion, osteonecrosis, fishtail deformity, and ongoing range of motion limitations are seen less commonly in lateral condylar fractures^11-13.

Important Tips

Reserve nonoperative management for minimally displaced fractures that can be followed closely.An arthrogram is required for closed reduction to ensure joint surface congruity.Avoid posterior dissection as it risks the blood supply to the distal fragment.Counsel parents that lateral overgrowth is to be expected and results in no functional limitations to the patient.

Biodegradable pins for lateral condylar fracture of the humerus with an early delayed presentation in children: a retrospective study of biodegradable pin vs. Kirschner wire

Background

The clinical outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for delayed lateral condylar fracture of the humerus (LCFH) varies in different studies, but ORIF for LCFH with an early-delayed presentation usually resulted in significant improvement of elbow function. Early delayed presentation is defined as a period of 3 to 12 weeks from the injury. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of biodegradable pin (BP) vs. Kirschner wire (KW) in the treatment of LCFH with an early delayed presentation.

Methods

LCFH with an early-delayed presentation treated with KW or BP were retrospectively reviewed in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups KW (n = 17) and BP group (n = 26). Baseline information, including sex, age, operative side, duration from injury to surgery, and implant choice, was reviewed. Radiographs and medical records were collected from the Hospital Database.

Results

In all, 17 patients (male/female, 9/8) in KW and 26 patients (male/female,13/13) in the BP group were included. The age showed no statistically significant difference between the KW (52.3 ± 10.2, month) and the BP (56.1 ± 10.7, month), (P = 0.258). At the last follow-up, there existed no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning Baumann’s angle (P = 0.272) and carrying angle (P = 0.911). The MEPS at the last follow-up was better in the KW group (91.1 ± 2.7) than the BP group (89.2 ± 3.0), (P = 0.048). There was no case of nonunion or malunion in both groups. The incidence of fishtail deformity was (8/17, 47.1%) in KW and (13/26, 50%) in the BP group. The incidence of lateral prominence was (5/17, 29.4%) in the KW and (7/26, 26.9%) in the BP group. Furthermore, the incidence of implant prominence was higher in KW (12/17, 70.6%) than BP (0) (P <  0.001).

Conclusion

Open reduction and internal fixation for LCFH with an early-delayed presentation produced satisfactory outcomes. Biodegradable pin is a good alternative to Kirschner wire, with comparable clinical outcomes.

The routine cutoff displacement of 2 mm may not reliably reflect the stability of paediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures

INTRODUCTION

Lateral humeral condyle fracture is one of the most common fractures in children. However, the prediction of the stability of the fracture with a cutoff displacement of 2 mm remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the routine cutoff displacement of 2 mm in predicting the stability of paediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures.

METHODS

A cohort of 79 children with imaging results for lateral humeral condyle fractures from 2013 to 2019 was evaluated. The displacement on the radiographs was measured by three surgeons at different levels, and ultrasound images were obtained by two senior surgeons. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A binary logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the association between the measurement and the integrity of cartilage hinges.

RESULTS

The ICC for the interobserver reliability was 0.85, and the intraobserver reliability was 0.93. For each additional millimetre of displacement, the odds of cartilage hinge disruption increased by 70%. The ROC curve determined that the Youden index was only 0.07 (sensitivity, 97.8%; specificity, 8.8%) with a cutoff displacement of 2 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine cutoff displacement of 2 mm may not reliably reflect the stability of paediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures. The cutoff value is sensitive but not specific for predicting whether the cartilage hinge is intact.

Is biodegradable pin a good choice for lateral condylar fracture of humerus in children: A comparative study of biodegradable pin and Kirschner wire

INTRODUCTION

Lateral condylar fracture (LCF) of the humerus in children is one of the commonest elbow injuries in children. Early recognition of the problem and appropriate management usually yields satisfactory outcomes. Closed or open reduction with Kirschner-wire (KW) is a cost-effective choice of fixation method for displaced fracture. However, various other methods, including partially threaded cannulated cancellous screw and biodegradable pin (BP), have also been used. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of BP and compare its clinical outcomes with KW.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with LCF admitted from January 2008 to January 2016 at our institute were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline information and clinical data were collected from Hospital Database. Patients were divided into the KW group and BP group.

RESULTS

In all, 85 patients (male 50, female 35) in the KW group and 76 patients (male 47, female 29) in the BP group were included in this study. The average age of patients in the KW group was 5.2 years, and that of BP was 5.9 years. No nonunion or malunion was observed in either group. At the last follow-up visit, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to elbow function and appearance. The incidence of long-term complications, including avascular necrosis, fishtail deformity, and lateral prominence, showed no significant difference between both the groups. The incidence of hardware prominence was higher in the KW (13/85, 15.6%) than BP (2/76, 2.6%) group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both KW and BP are safe and effective choices for LCF of the humerus in children. Both the implant designs produce satisfactory and comparable clinical outcomes. However, BP has the advantage of less hardware prominence, no need for hardware removal, and fewer long-term complications.

Prospective Evaluation of a Treatment Protocol Based on Fracture Displacement for Pediatric Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

To prospectively evaluate a displacement-based classification system and an outcome-derived algorithm in the treatment of children with lateral condyle fractures.

METHODS

All children with a lateral condyle fracture were prospectively enrolled at our institution between 2013 and 2016. Fractures were classified and treated on the basis of the following classification system: type 1: <2 mm; treated with long arm casting, type II: 2 to 4 mm; treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), and type III: >4 mm; open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP). Functional outcomes were assessed at 6 to 12 weeks and at 1-year follow-ups using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI).

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (mean age, 6 y; range 2 to 12 y) were prospectively enrolled. There were 17 (31%) type I fractures treated with a long arm cast, 8 (15%) type II treated with CRPP, and 30 (54%) type III treated with ORPP. Postoperative complications included delayed union (N=5) and pin site infection (N=3). Delayed unions on the basis of fracture type was type I (1/17, 6%), type II (1/8, 13%), and type III (3/30, 10%) (P=0.85). The rate of delayed unions in type II and III fractures fixed with k-wires was 11% (4/38). Four patients required a second operation with screw fixation. No significant differences were found across PODCI domains at 1-year follow-up when comparing our study population with normative data.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective study of a treatment protocol for pediatric lateral condyle fractures and validates the use of displacement as a guide for best evidence-based treatment. Children with a lateral condyle fracture can achieve excellent functional outcomes in all classification types with comparable complication rates when radiographic fracture displacement is used to guide surgical and clinical decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Different classifications concerning fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children

PURPOSE

Fractures of the lateral condyle are the second most frequent elbow fractures in children. Although the pathobiomechanism is well known and different fracture classifications exist, there are still adverse clinical results. This raises the questions how precise classifications predict fracture stability, especially in the context of choosing the best therapy. It also remains unclear how these classifications can be applied in practice.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with a fracture of the lateral condyle were analyzed in this retrospective study. We included all patients with an age ≤ 14 years admitted at a German Level I Trauma Center between 2005 and 2017. Different classifications according to Jakob, Finnbogason, Song and Hasler/v. Laer have been applied.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with fractures of the lateral condyle were analyzed thereof 53 treated operatively and 22 conservatively. In sum, 6 out of 75 fractures showed no lateralization (Jakob: stable) in the first X-ray, but the same wide of the fracture gap medial as lateral (Finnbogason and Song: unstable). In 2 out of 75 patients, fracture instability occurred although it was not detected by the classification of Jakob, Finnbogason, Song and Hasler/v. Laer.

CONCLUSION

Classifying fractures according to the Jakob-Classification has limitations if notable rotation without lateral displacement occurs. Hasler/v. Laer's classification appears most adequate but can sometimes not be applied due to missing X-ray 4 days after trauma. The Finnbogason- and Song-Classification performs best in prediction of instability based on the X-ray at the time of accident because of considering the fracture pathobiomechanism. All in all, we recommend the classification of Hasler and v. Laer, because it is the best predictive classification.

What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Trauma: The Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity fractures are the most common fractures in children. Many high-quality studies have been reported regarding operative and nonoperative treatment of different upper extremity fractures in children. This review will summarize the literature on 4 major upper extremity fractures in children over the past 5 years.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were queried for publications in the English language on supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures, lateral humeral condyle fractures, medial epicondyle fractures, and clavicle fractures from January 1, 2013 until November 1, 2018. Papers believed to yield significant findings to our profession were included in this review.

RESULTS

A total of 1150 studies were related to the search terms, and after cursory assessment, the authors elected to fully review 30 papers for this publication: 12 related to SCH fractures, 10 related to lateral condyle humerus fractures, 3 related to medial epicondyle humerus fractures, and 5 involving clavicle fractures. The level of evidence for these studies was either level III or IV.

CONCLUSIONS

SCH fractures are increasingly being treated at trauma centers or pediatric hospitals in the United States. The rate of open reduction in this fracture type is decreasing overall, but the flexion type SCH fractures (especially in the setting of ulnar nerve injury) continue to be at increased risk of requiring open reduction. There has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of lateral condyle humerus fractures, wherein authors have demonstrated successful management with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning when an adjunct arthrogram is performed demonstrating articular congruity. More studies are needed to find the optimal treatment for displaced medial epicondyle and clavicle fractures in adolescents, as results to date do not necessarily mirror those seen in the adult population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The Community Orthopaedic Surgeon Taking Trauma Call: Lateral Humeral Condyle Fracture Pearls and Pitfalls

Lateral condyle fractures are second only to supracondylar humeral fractures when it comes to pediatric elbow fractures. Whether minimally displaced or substantially displaced, these growth plate fractures may present significant treatment challenges. These include nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, and growth disturbance. It must be remembered that lateral condyle fractures often represent significantly displaced intra-articular fractures involving the epiphysis that demand anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. This article focuses on some of the pertinent pearls and pitfalls regarding these common elbow injuries using ample clinical examples.

Posteromedial elbow dislocation with lateral humeral condylar fracture in children: Three case reports and a literature review

RATIONALE

Posteromedial dislocations of the elbow with lateral humeral condylar fractures (LCFs) are uncommon, and only isolated cases have been reported in the English-language literature. Because of the complex radiolucent cartilaginous structures and late-appearing ossification centers, radiological diagnosis of elbow dislocations with LCF in children is challenging.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report three children with posteromedial elbow dislocation: two patients with Milch type I and one patient with Milch type II LCF.

DIAGNOSES

In our report, radiographs showed only a small bone fragment, and arthrography or computed tomography were helpful diagnostic aids in cases 1 and 3. In contrast, the patient in case 2 was initially misdiagnosed as having an epiphyseal separation of the distal humerus, and open reduction and internal fixation through the posterior approach revealed Milch type II LCF.

INTERVENTIONS

In case 1 and 3, Milch type I LCFs, open reduction and internal fixation was performed through the posterolateral approach. On the other hand, in case 2, Milch type II LCF, open reduction and internal fixation was performed through the posterior approach.

OUTCOMES

Poor reduction of Milch type I LCFs resulted in incongruity of the articular surface and poor cosmetic results in two patients. In case 2, Milch type II LCF, plain radiographs showed adequate healing without elbow deformity and the clinical result was excellent.

LESSONS

Because LCFs are intra-articular fractures, anatomical reduction is crucial for satisfactory outcomes. We promote awareness of this injury, especially posteromedial dislocation with Milch type I LCF. Preoperative evaluation is helpful for achieving satisfactory outcomes, and open reduction and internal fixation through an anterolateral approach might be most appropriate for Milch type I LCFs.