Wear resistance of first-generation highly cross-linked annealed polyethylene in cementless total hip arthroplasty is maintained 20 years after surgery

Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years of Age and Younger: A 20-year Follow-Up Analysis

BACKGROUND

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been an excellent bearing for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to improved wear characteristics compared to conventional materials. Patients 50 years of age or younger are at high risk for wear-related complications of their THA, and few studies have followed these patients who have HXPLE into the third decade.

METHODS

In a retrospective review of 88 consecutive THAs performed in 77 patients aged 50 years and younger (mean 41; range, 20 to 50), in which HXLPE was utilized, they were evaluated for their clinical and radiographic results at an average of 20-year follow-up (range, 18 to 24). The current study reports on longer-term follow-up from our previously published series at shorter follow-up times. Patients were categorized by femoral head material: cobalt chrome (n = 14), ceramic (n = 30), and oxidized zirconium (n = 22) and by femoral head size: 26 mm (n = 12), 28 mm (n = 46), and 32 mm (n = 8). Harris Hip Scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for linear and volumetric wear, radiolucent lines, and osteolysis.

RESULTS

Mean Harris Hip Scores improved from 47.1 (standard deviation [SD] 8.8) preoperatively to 92.0 (SD 7.7) (P < .0001) at 20-year follow-up. There was one hip that was revised for recurrent instability, and no hip demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening or osteolysis. The mean polyethylene linear wear rate was 0.017 (SD 0.012) mm/y, and the mean polyethylene volumetric wear rate was 3.15 (SD 2.8) mm3/year, with no significant differences based on articulation type or head size.

CONCLUSIONS

Total hip arthroplasty with HXLPE in patients ≤ 50 years of age continues to demonstrate excellent long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with low wear characteristics at 20-year follow-up, regardless of femoral head material or size.

Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful orthopaedic surgical procedure, and its longevity depends on bearing components and implant fixation. Optimizing polyethylene and ceramics has led to improved wear parameters and contributed to improved long-term outcomes. The present systematic review investigated whether time span from implantation, patient characteristics and performance status exert an influence on liner wear and head migration in THA. This study was conducted in conformity to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. All the clinical investigations which reported quantitative data on the amount of liner wear and head migration in THA were considered. Only studies which reported quantitative data at least on one of the following patient characteristics were suitable: mean age, mean BMI (kg/m2), sex, side, time span between the index THA and the last follow-up (months) were eligible. A multiple linear model regression analysis was employed to verify the association between patient characteristics and the amount of liner wear and/or head migration. The Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient was used to assess the association between variables. Data from 12,629 patients were considered. The mean length of the follow-up was 90.5 ± 50.9 months. The mean age of patients at surgery was 58.4 ± 9.4 years, and the mean BMI was 27.2 ± 2.5 kg/m2. 57% (7199 of 12,629 patients) were women, and in 44% (5557 of 12,629 patients) THAs were performed on the left. The mean pre-operative Harris hip score was 46.5 ± 6.0 points. There was evidence of a moderate positive association between the amount of liner wear and the time elapsed between the index surgery to the follow-up (P = 0.02). There was evidence of a moderate positive association between the amount of head migration and the time elapsed between the index surgery to the follow-up (P = 0.01). No further statistically significant association was found. The time elapsed between the index surgery to the follow-up was the most important factor which influence the head migration and liner wear in THA. Patients' characteristics and preoperative physical activity did not influence the amount of head migration and liner wear.

Highly crosslinked polyethylene liner thickness does not influence survival in primary total hip arthroplasty after mean follow-up of 13 years: a study of 2,565 hips with a single design liner

BACKGROUND

Concerns remain that thinner highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA) may lead to premature liner-related failures or revision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of liner-thickness on survival and revision rates of HXLPE in primary THA after more than 10 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 2,565 primary THA using HXLPE with a mean follow-up of 13 years (range, 11 to 19). Patients were grouped for each millimeter (mm) of polyethylene thickness. Liner thickness varied from 4.9 to 12.7 mm, with one third measuring less than 6 mm. Primary outcomes were reoperation, all-cause revision, and liner-related revision.

RESULTS

The reoperation rate was 7.3%, the all-cause revision rate was 5.6%, and the liner-related revision rate was 0.04%. There was no significant difference in all-cause revision when stratified by liner thickness (P=0.286) and liner thickness was not associated with liner-related revision (n=1). There was a statistically, but not clinically significant difference in mean liner thickness for the cohort that underwent reoperation (7.09 vs 6.89 mm, P=0.01) and all-cause revision (7.16 vs 6.89 mm, P=0.031).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, liner thickness was not associated with all-cause revision-free survival and there was no clinically significant difference in liner thickness between those patients who did require a reoperation or all-cause revision, and those who did not. There was only 1 liner related failure in the entire cohort. Our results indicate that using thinner HXPE liners to maximize femoral head size in THA is a safe practice that does not lead to increased revision rates or liner failure at a mean 13 years follow-up.

Thin highly cross-linked polyethylene liners combined with large femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty show excellent survival and low wear rates at a mean follow-up of 12.8 years

AIMS

Several short- and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the safety of using thinner HXLPE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical survival and radiological wear rates of patients with HXLPE liners, a 36 mm femoral head, and a small acetabular component with a minimum of ten years' follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 55 patients who underwent primary THA performed at a single centre, using HXLPE liners with 36 mm cobalt-chrome heads in acetabular components with an outer diameter of 52 mm or smaller. Patient demographic details, implant details, death, and all-cause revisions were recorded. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival was used to determine all-cause and liner-specific revision. Of these 55 patients, 22 had a minimum radiological follow-up of seven years and were assessed radiologically for linear and volumetric wear.

RESULTS

Overall survival rate for all-cause revision was 94.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81.7% to 97.2%) at a mean follow-up of 12.8 years (10.9 to 18.7). Three patients were revised, none for liner wear, fracture, or dissociation. A total of 22 patients were included in the radiological analysis (mean follow-up 9.9 years (7.5 to 13.7)). Mean linear liner wear was 0.085 mm (95% CI -0.086 to 0.257) and the volumetric wear rate was 11.097 mm³/year (95% CI -6.5 to 28.7).

CONCLUSION

Using HXLPE liners with 36 mm heads in 52 mm acetabular components or smaller is safe, with excellent survival and low rates of linear and volumetric wear at medium-term follow-up. Patients did not require revision surgery for liner complications such as fracture, dissociation, or wear. Our results suggest that the advantages of using larger heads outweigh the potential risks of using thin HXLPE liners.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):29-34.

New polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty : a 20- to 22-year follow-up study

AIMS

A significant reduction in wear at five and ten years was previously reported when comparing Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene with nitrogen-sterilized Sulene polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated whether the improvement observed at the earlier follow-up continued, resulting in decreased osteolysis and revision surgery rates over the second decade.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2001, 90 patients underwent surgery using the same acetabular and femoral components with a 28 mm metallic femoral head and either a Durasul or Sulene liner. A total of 66 hips of this prospective randomized study were available for a minimum follow-up of 20 years. The linear femoral head penetration rate was measured at six weeks, one year, and annually thereafter, using the Dorr method on digitized radiographs with a software package.

RESULTS

In the Durasul group, no patients underwent revision due to loosening or showed radiological evidence of osteolysis. In the Sulene group, four patients (four hips) were revised due to femoral component loosening. The 20-year cumulative failure incidence in the presence of the competing event of death for revision surgery was 4.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 13.6) in the Durasul group, and 8.9% (95% CI 2.8 to 19.5) in the Sulene group. The mean wear one year after surgery was 0.09 mm (SD 0.007) in the Durasul group and 0.24 (SD 0.015) in the Sulene group (p < 0.001). From one to 20 years after surgery, the mean total penetration was 0.32 mm (SD 0.045) in the Durasul group and 1.07 mm (SD 0.13) in the Sulene group (p < 0.001). Mean femoral head penetration at 20 years was approximately 70.0% less in the Durasul group than the Sulene group.

CONCLUSION

The significant reduction in femoral head penetration obtained with the Durasul compared with Sulene in uncemented THA resulted in lower osteolysis and revision rates after 20 years.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1032-1038.