1
|
Hickie KL, Neufeld ME, Howard LC, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Long-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty with the Zimmer Modular Revision hip system. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B:112-117. [PMID: 38688497 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0733.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Aims There are limited long-term studies reporting on outcomes of the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR) stem, and concerns remain regarding failure. Our primary aim was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure for this modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aims included evaluating radiological and functional outcomes. Methods We retrospectively identified all patients in our institutional database who underwent revision THA using the ZMR system from January 2000 to December 2007. We included 106 patients (108 hips) with a mean follow-up of 14.5 years (2.3 to 22.3). Mean patient age was 69.2 years (37.0 to 89.4), and 51.9% were female (n = 55). Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (73.1%), infection (16.7%), fracture (9.3%), and stem fracture (0.9%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the all-cause and stem-related failure revision-free survival. At most recent follow-up, Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected, and radiological stem stability was determined using the Engh classification. Results A total of 17 hips (15.7%) underwent re-revision of any component. Indications for re-revision were stem failure (35.3%; n = 6), infection (29.4%; n = 5), instability (29.4%; n = 5), and acetabular aseptic loosening (5.9%; n = 1). The five- and 15-year all-cause survival was 89.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 92.7) and 83.3% (95% CI 79.6 to 87.0), respectively. There were six re-revisions (5.6%) for stem failure; five for stem fracture and one for aseptic loosening. The five- and 15-year survival free from stem-related failure was 97.2% (95% CI 95.6 to 98.8) and 94.0% (95% CI 91.6 to 96.4), respectively. At final follow-up, the mean OHS was 36.9 (8.0 to 48.0) and 95.7% (n = 66) of surviving modular revision stems were well-fixed in available radiographs. Conclusion Femoral revision with the ZMR offers satisfactory long-term all-cause revision-free survival, good survival free of stem-related failure, and favourable clinical outcomes. Stem fracture was the most common reason for stem-related failure and occurred both early and late. This highlights the importance of both early and long-term surveillance for stem-related failure.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sheridan GA, Abdelmalek M, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials. J Orthop 2024; 50:99-110. [PMID: 38187368 PMCID: PMC10770435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Recent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of technology in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) demonstrated that navigated computer-assisted methods (N-TKA) is likely to be most cost-effective in the clinical setting. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to compare radiographic, clinical and functional outcomes between conventional TKA (C-TKA) and N-TKA methods. Methods All prospective randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) comparing primary TKA performed using C-TKA and N-TKA techniques were eligible for inclusion. Radiographic outcomes included postoperative coronal, sagittal and axial component alignment. Clinical outcomes included all-cause revision and aseptic revision. Functional outcomes were analyzed when reported. A random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. This allowed for all missing data. Results Normal coronal mechanical alignment of the tibial (p < 0.001) and femoral (p = 0.001) components was achieved more frequently with N-TKA. Normal sagittal mechanical alignment of the tibial component was achieved significantly more with N-TKA (p < 0.010). There was no difference in short-term clinical survivorship (all-cause, p = 0.649; aseptic, p = 0.79) or in functional outcomes reported between groups. There was a clinically significant reduction in the mean C-TKA operative time (87 min, σ = 16.6, 95% CI 76.4-98.8) compared N-TKA (97.6 min, σ = 16.9, 95% CI 86.2-109.1) (p = 0.17). Conclusion Navigated TKA achieves superior radiographic alignment for femoral and tibial components in both the coronal and sagittal plane. Operative times are 10 min longer in the N-TKA group. Functional outcomes are similar between navigated and conventional groups. Clinical outcomes reported in Level I studies are limited to short-term follow-up so future prospective studies are required.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kayani B, Bengoa F, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Masri BA. Articulating Spacers in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 2024; 55:181-192. [PMID: 38403365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Although one-stage exchange arthroplasty is gaining popularity, two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. Use of an articulating spacer for this procedure offers an avenue for maintaining hip motion and controlled weight-bearing, allowing local antibiotic elution. However, there is no uniform consensus on the optimal surgical protocol for using articulating spacers. This review describes the surgical technique for undertaking a first-stage exchange arthroplasty using an articulating spacer and discusses the pertinent literature on key concepts relating to periprosthetic joint infections in total hip arthroplasty to guide effective surgical decision making in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babar Kayani
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Francisco Bengoa
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kayani B, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00238-9. [PMID: 38508344 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones may facilitate reconstructions of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there remains a paucity of data on their outcomes at mean 5 years of follow-up. This study reports the component survivorship, patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, radiographic osseointegration, and complications of revision TKA with porous tantalum metaphyseal cones at mid-term (mean 5-year) follow-up. METHODS This study included 152 patients who had a mean age of 66 years (range, 33 to 86 years) undergoing revision TKA with porous tantalum metaphyseal cones. Indications for surgery included aseptic loosening (n = 87, 57.3%), second-stage reimplantation for infection (n = 42, 27.6%), osteolysis with well-fixed components (n = 20, 13.2%), and periprosthetic fracture (n = 3, 2.0%). Component survivorship, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and any complications were recorded. The mean follow-up time was 5.6 years (range, 2.2 to 13.7). RESULTS Survivorship was 100% when the end point was revision of the metaphyseal cone (no cones were revised) and 83.8% (95% confidence interval: 77.9 to 90.2%) when the end point was reoperation for any reason at 5-year follow-up. Reoperations were performed for infection (n = 10), instability (n = 4), periprosthetic fracture (n = 2), and quadriceps rupture/dehiscence (n = 3). The mean patient satisfaction score was 78.8 ± 11.3 and the mean Forgotten Joint Score was 62.2 ± 16.7 at the final follow-up. The preoperative median University of California at Los Angeles score improved from 2 (interquartile range 2 to 3) to 6 points (interquartile range 5 to 6) (P < .001), and the preoperative Oxford knee score improved from 15.2 ± 3.8 to 39.4 ± 5.1 points (P < .001) at the final follow-up. All metaphyseal cones showed radiographic evidence of osteointegration without any subsidence or loosening. CONCLUSIONS Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones enabled robust reconstructions of severe femoral and tibial bone defects during revision TKA. These reconstructions were associated with excellent survivorship, improvements in functional outcomes, and reproducible radiographic osseointegration at mean 5-year follow-up. The most common reasons for reoperation were infection and instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babar Kayani
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ali E, Neufeld ME, Howard L, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS. Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Re-Revision Due to Trunnion Corrosion in Primary Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00080-9. [PMID: 38336304 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of literature regarding the mid-term (greater than 2 years) outcomes of revision for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) to metal debris due to corrosion at the head-neck junction (trunnionosis) in metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA), and risk factors for re-revision remain largely unknown. We aimed to report the re-revision-free survival and functional outcomes for this patient population and to identify risk factors for re-revision. METHODS A total of 80 hips (79 patients) with a MoP THA who had undergone revision for trunnionosis at our institution were included. The mean study follow-up from index trunnionosis revision was 4.6 years (range, 2.0 to 9.4). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with all-cause re-revision as the endpoint, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for re-revision. RESULTS We saw that twenty-one hips (26%) underwent re-revision at a mean of 8.0 months (range, 0.03 to 36.3) after the index trunnionosis revision, most commonly for instability and infection. The two- and five-year all-cause re-revision-free survival rates were 75.0 and 73.2%, respectively. The mean Oxford Hip Score was 33.7 (range, 11 to 48); 76% were satisfied, and 24% were dissatisfied with their hip. Multivariate analysis identified not undergoing a cup revision (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.5, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.03 to 19.7) and time from primary THA to the index trunnionosis revision (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97) as risk factors for undergoing re-revision. CONCLUSION The risk of early re-revision for these patients is high (26%), mostly due to infection and instability, and functional outcomes are fair. Not performing a cup revision appears to be a risk factor for re-revision, as is the shorter time from primary THA to trunnionosis revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erden Ali
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lisa Howard
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Faculty of Medicine- Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia(,) Diamond Health Care Centre, 11295-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali E, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Masri BA. Treatment of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a clinical practice review. Ann Jt 2024; 9:4. [PMID: 38529292 PMCID: PMC10929365 DOI: 10.21037/aoj-23-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Patient and implant selection is essential to optimize outcome. Femoral bone loss classifications such as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Gross, and Paprosky classifications permit surgeons to systematically manage bone stock deficiencies and guide implant selection. Here we provide a comprehensive report on the pitfalls and management of this reconstructive challenge. Preoperative planning remains vital to the treatment of femoral bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty and the authors believe it is essential and should include the entire femur. This commonly includes imaging for bone loss such as Judet views or computed tomography scan and must include the entire femur though additional radiographs such as Judet views apply more for acetabular bone loss as opposed to femoral bone loss. All patients should have pre-operative work up to exclude infection. If any of these results area elevated, an aspirate and sampling is required to guide microbiological management. Classically with regards femoral revision surgery, uncemented fixation has proven to give the best outcomes but surgeons must remain flexible and use cemented fixation when necessary. Adequate proximal bone stock permits the use of implants used in primary joint surgery. Implants with proximal modularity can be used in cases where bone stock allows for superb proximal bone support. The vast majority of femoral revisions have inadequate proximal bone stock, thus distally fixed stems should be used and have been shown to provide both axial and rotational stability provided there is an intact isthmus. Taper fluted stems can provide good outcomes even in cases of major bone loss. However, with severe bony loss, impaction grating or the use of a megaprotsthesis is sometimes necessary and is down to surgeon choice and preference. This article has been written as a guide for management and summarises the best evidence available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erden Ali
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, UK
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, UK
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, UK
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sheridan GA, Neufeld ME, Sidhu A, Kurmis AP, Kelly M, O'Byrne JM, Howard LC, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. The Diagnostic Utility of Serum Metal Ion Markers for High-Grade Aseptic Lymphocyte-Dominated Vasculitis-Associated Lesions (ALVALs) in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An International Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:206-210. [PMID: 37331438 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVALs) are typically described in the context of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip bearings. This study explores the diagnostic utility of preoperative serum cobalt and chromium ion levels in determining the histological grade of ALVAL in revision hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective review of 26 hips and 13 knees assessing the correlation between preoperative ion levels (mg/L (ppb)) and the histological grade of ALVAL from intraoperative specimens. The diagnostic ability of preoperative serum cobalt and chromium levels to determine high-grade ALVAL was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS In the knee cohort, there was a higher serum cobalt level in high-grade ALVAL cases (10.2 mg/L (ppb) versus 3.1 mg/L (ppb)) (P = .0002). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.00). There was a higher serum chromium level in high-grade ALVAL cases (12.25 mg/L (ppb) versus 7.77 mg/L (ppb)) (P = .0002). The AUC was 0.806 (95% CI 0.555 to 1.00). In the hip cohort, there was a higher serum cobalt level in high-grade ALVAL cases (333.5 mg/L (ppb) versus 119.9 mg/L (ppb)) (P = .0831). The AUC was 0.619 (95% CI 0.388 to 0.849). There was a higher serum chromium level in high-grade ALVAL cases (186.4 mg/L (ppb) versus 79.3 mg/L (ppb)) (P = .183). The AUC was 0.595 (95% CI 0.365 to 0.824). CONCLUSIONS Histologically, high-grade ALVAL has significantly higher preoperative serum cobalt and chromium ion levels in revision TKA. Preoperative serum ion levels have excellent diagnostic utility in revision TKA. Cobalt levels in revision THA have a fair diagnostic ability and chromium levels had a poor diagnostic ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Arsh Sidhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrew P Kurmis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Vale, Elizabeth, SA, Australia
| | - Martin Kelly
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sheridan GA, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. International primary hip arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports. Ir J Med Sci 2023; 192:2851-2858. [PMID: 36928594 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03330-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
We present key information from international registries in relation to primary total hip arthroplasty. The specific questions of interest include which bearings are superior in total hip arthroplasty (THA), which fixation types are optimal, do any specific implants perform better than others, and what is the latest update in the hip fracture setting? This is a comprehensive review of the major English-speaking hip arthroplasty registries across the globe. Key trends and developments in implant performance are identified and presented in the current article. Key points from review of all registries confirm that ceramic-on-polyethylene and metal-on-polyethylene continue to be the commonest bearings. The use of cemented femoral stems is increasing across most regions. Hybrid fixation is now the commonest fixation method in the UK for the first time in registry history. Uncemented femoral stems have a higher early revision rate for periprosthetic fracture than cemented stems across most regions. Dual mobility (DM) bearings are increasing in use and show higher early revision rates than unipolar bearings-they tend to be used for more complex indications (fracture/tumor/revision) and show similar revision rates to unipolar bearings when used exclusively in primary elective THA for osteoarthritis. We present current trends in THA based on current registry data from across the globe. Clinical signals of concern are emerging for THA uncemented femoral stem fixation and DM bearings in specific clinical contexts. These signals should be monitored across the literature in order to reduce the overall revision burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bengoa F, Neufeld ME, Howard LC, Masri BA. Periprosthetic Fractures After a Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e746-e759. [PMID: 37364252 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
As the number of total knee arthroplasties performed continues to increase, complications such as postoperative periprosthetic fractures are becoming increasingly more common. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are the most common type of fractures around a total knee arthroplasty, whereas tibial and patellar periprosthetic fractures are infrequent. Treatment principles depend on the bone the fracture is located, the status of the implant fixation, bone stock, and the type of implants available. The Vancouver classification allows for a standardized system to describe and manage these injuries, incorporating these factors. A systematic approach is vital in obtaining the best possible outcomes because complications and mortality rates mimic those of hip fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Bengoa
- From the Department of Orthopaedics, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sidhu A, Sheridan GA, Greidanus NV, Neufeld ME, Howard LC, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. International primary knee arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023; 33:2729-2735. [PMID: 36947314 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03521-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION International joint registries provide high volumes of information in relation to the performance of total knee arthroplasty on a global scale. Distillation of this data can be challenging, particularly with the establishment of more arthroplasty registries on a yearly basis. We therefore aim to present key information from these registries in relation to primary total knee arthroplasty. The specific questions of interest include: Which fixation type is superior in TKA? Does the level of constraint impact on clinical performance? How do partial knee replacements perform in the registries? Does patellar resurfacing lead to superior results? Are there any specific implants which perform particularly well or poorly? METHODS A comprehensive review of the major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries across the globe was performed. Given the expanding large number of registries worldwide, it was not possible to perform a comprehensive review of all registries and so, a detailed review of the major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries was included. Key trends and developments in implant performance were identified and presented in the current article. RESULTS Total knee replacements have lower revision rates than both unicompartmental and patellofemoral joint replacement procedures. Patellofemoral joint replacements have the highest failure rate of all knee replacement procedures. Cruciate-Retaining (CR) TKR designs have superior outcomes to Posterior-Stabilized (PS) designs across all registries. Patellar resurfacing appears to confer an advantage over non-resurfaced patellas in primary TKR. CONCLUSION We present current global trends in the utility and performance of TKA based on data from English-speaking arthroplasty registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsh Sidhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gerard A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kayani B, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. Cannabis and Pain Control After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:407-415. [PMID: 37718080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Cannabis use among the elderly has increased over the previous 2 decades. This has translated to a greater proportion of orthopedic procedures being undertaken on these patients. This review provides clinicians with evidence-based information on the effects of cannabis on pain control in THA and TKA, to help counsel these patients and facilitate their perioperative management. The review specifically focuses on the following: origins of cannabis; biochemistry of cannabis; medical versus recreational cannabis; pharmacology of cannabis; effects of cannabis on bone metabolism; preoperative pain control; preoperative systemic considerations; intraoperative considerations; postoperative pain control, postoperative systemic considerations; and scope for future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babar Kayani
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction & Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bengoa F, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Garbuz DS. Malseating of Modular Dual Mobility Liners: High Prevalence in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023:S0883-5403(23)00344-3. [PMID: 37028771 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular components have become increasingly more popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Uncertainty remains regarding liner malseating and its consequences after 5 to 10 years, especially in patients who undergo revision THA. The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of malseating and implant survivorship of patients who underwent revision THA using an MDM liner. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients who had a minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent revision THA using an MDM liner. Patient demographics, implant details, mortality, and all-cause revisions were recorded. Patients who had radiographic follow-up were assessed for malseating. Kaplan Meier survival was used to determine implant survivorship. We included 143 hips in 141 patients. Mean age was 70 years (35 - 93 years) and 86 patients (60.1%) were female. RESULTS Overall implant survival was 89.3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.843 - 0.946) at a mean follow-up of 6 years (range 2 to 10) years. There were eight patients excluded from malseating assessment. Upon radiological review, 15 liners (11.1%) were malseated. Survival for all-cause revision for patients with malseated liners was 80.0% (12/15, 95% CI 0.62 - 0.99, P= 0.15) versus 91.5% in patients who had non-malseated liners (110/120, 95% CI 0.86 - 0.96). There were no intraprosthetic dislocations and 3.5% of the patients were revised due to instability. No liners were revised due to malseating, and no patients who had malseated liners were revised due to instability. CONCLUSIONS Using MDM components in our cohort comprised of revision THA was associated with a high prevalence of malseating and an overall survival of 89.3% at a mean follow up of 6 years. Malseating does not appear to impact implant survival at a mean follow-up of 6 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Bengoa
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fransen BL, Howard LC, MacDonell T, Bengoa F, Sheridan GA, Garbuz DS, Neufeld ME. Highly crosslinked polyethylene liner thickness does not influence survival in primary total hip arthroplasty after mean follow-up of 13 years: a study of 2,565 hips with a single design liner. J Arthroplasty 2023:S0883-5403(23)00260-7. [PMID: 36931361 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns remain that thinner highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA) may lead to premature liner-related failures or revision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of liner-thickness on survival and revision rates of HXLPE in primary THA after more than 10 years. METHODS We retrospectively identified 2,565 primary THA using HXLPE with a mean follow-up of 13 years (range, 11 to 19). Patients were grouped for each millimeter (mm) of polyethylene thickness. Liner thickness varied from 4.9 to 12.7 mm, with one third measuring less than 6 mm. Primary outcomes were reoperation, all-cause revision, and liner-related revision. RESULTS The reoperation rate was 7.3%, the all-cause revision rate was 5.6%, and the liner-related revision rate was 0.04%. There was no significant difference in all-cause revision when stratified by liner thickness (P=0.286) and liner thickness was not associated with liner-related revision (n=1). There was a statistically, but not clinically significant difference in mean liner thickness for the cohort that underwent reoperation (7.09 vs 6.89 mm, P=0.01) and all-cause revision (7.16 vs 6.89 mm, P=0.031). CONCLUSION In our cohort, liner thickness was not associated with all-cause revision-free survival and there was no clinically significant difference in liner thickness between those patients who did require a reoperation or all-cause revision, and those who did not. There was only 1 liner related failure in the entire cohort. Our results indicate that using thinner HXPE liners to maximize femoral head size in THA is a safe practice that does not lead to increased revision rates or liner failure at a mean 13 years follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Fransen
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - L C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - T MacDonell
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - F Bengoa
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - G A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - D S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - M E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kocaoğlu H, Hennes F, Abdelaziz H, Neufeld ME, Gehrke T, Citak M. Survival analysis of one-stage exchange of infected unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-center study with minimum 3 years follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023; 33:327-333. [PMID: 35066655 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03187-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The rates of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are increasing yet little data exists regarding management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after UKA, particularly utilizing one-stage revision. The aim of this study was to determine the septic and all-cause revision-free survival of UKA PJIs treated with one-stage revision, as well as functional outcomes and risk factors for failure. METHODS A retrospective review of one-stage septic revisions with a hinged or rotating hinged implant between 2000 and 2015 at a single institution was performed. Results of 15 patients with a minimum of 3-year follow-up (mean = 93 months; range 37-217) were evaluated by means of infection control, survivorship, patient reported functional score and possible causal factors for a re-revision. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS After a mean of 8 years of follow-up infection control rate was 93.3%, the survivorship free of any reoperation, including both septic and aseptic causes, was 80% at 5 years and 64.2% at ten years and average Lysholm score was 72.7 ± 21.3 (33-100). CONCLUSION One-stage revision for PJI of UKA using a hinged knee design has excellent infection-free survival at mid to long-term follow-up. Likewise, patient reported functional outcomes are promising. However, one-third of patients required aseptic reoperation and aseptic loosening was the dominant etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Kocaoğlu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany. .,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ibn-i Sina Hospital Talatpasa Blvd, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Fabian Hennes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.,Zentrum für Rehabilitationmedizin/Sportmedizin, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Bergerdorfer Strasse 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hussein Abdelaziz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.,Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Neufeld ME, McEwen JA, Kerr J, Sidhu A, Howard LC, Masri BA. Optimization of surgical tourniquet usage to improve patient outcomes: Translational cross-disciplinary implications of a surgical practice survey. Front Surg 2023; 10:1104603. [PMID: 37139190 PMCID: PMC10149658 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1104603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Tourniquet use is common practice in many millions of orthopaedic procedures annually. Recent reviews of risks and benefits of surgical tourniquet use have primarily involved meta-analyses, many of which have forgone a comprehensive risk-benefit analysis to simply question whether "tourniquet or no tourniquet" use produces improved patient outcomes, often leading to limited, inconclusive, or conflicting results. To investigate further, a pilot survey was undertaken to determine current practices, opinions, and understandings among orthopaedic surgeons in Canada regarding use of surgical tourniquets in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Results of the pilot survey showed a wide range of understanding and practice associated with tourniquet use in TKAs, especially regarding tourniquet pressures and tourniquet times, two key factors known from basic research and clinical studies to impact the safety and efficacy of tourniquet use. The wide variation of use indicated by the survey results reveals important implications for surgeons, researchers, educators, and biomedical engineers, to better understand the association between key tourniquet parameters and outcomes assessed in research, which may be factors leading to their often limited, inconclusive, and conflicting results. Lastly, we provide an overview of the overly simplified assessments of tourniquet use in meta-analyses, whose conclusions may not provide an understanding of how or whether key tourniquet parameters might be optimized to retain the benefits of tourniquet use while mitigating the associated real or perceived risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E. Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Correspondence: Michael E. Neufeld
| | - James A. McEwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Western Clinical Engineering Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Julie Kerr
- Western Clinical Engineering Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arsh Sidhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lisa C. Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bassam A. Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fransen BL, Bengoa FJ, Neufeld ME, Sheridan GA, Garbuz DS, Howard LC. Thin highly cross-linked polyethylene liners combined with large femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty show excellent survival and low wear rates at a mean follow-up of 12.8 years. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:29-34. [PMID: 36587249 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b1.bjj-2022-0812.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Several short- and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the safety of using thinner HXLPE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical survival and radiological wear rates of patients with HXLPE liners, a 36 mm femoral head, and a small acetabular component with a minimum of ten years' follow-up. METHODS We retrospectively identified 55 patients who underwent primary THA performed at a single centre, using HXLPE liners with 36 mm cobalt-chrome heads in acetabular components with an outer diameter of 52 mm or smaller. Patient demographic details, implant details, death, and all-cause revisions were recorded. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival was used to determine all-cause and liner-specific revision. Of these 55 patients, 22 had a minimum radiological follow-up of seven years and were assessed radiologically for linear and volumetric wear. RESULTS Overall survival rate for all-cause revision was 94.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81.7% to 97.2%) at a mean follow-up of 12.8 years (10.9 to 18.7). Three patients were revised, none for liner wear, fracture, or dissociation. A total of 22 patients were included in the radiological analysis (mean follow-up 9.9 years (7.5 to 13.7)). Mean linear liner wear was 0.085 mm (95% CI -0.086 to 0.257) and the volumetric wear rate was 11.097 mm3/year (95% CI -6.5 to 28.7). CONCLUSION Using HXLPE liners with 36 mm heads in 52 mm acetabular components or smaller is safe, with excellent survival and low rates of linear and volumetric wear at medium-term follow-up. Patients did not require revision surgery for liner complications such as fracture, dissociation, or wear. Our results suggest that the advantages of using larger heads outweigh the potential risks of using thin HXLPE liners.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):29-34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas L Fransen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Francisco J Bengoa
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gerard A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sheridan GA, Neufeld ME, Howard LC, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. The Impact of Changing Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants at a High-Volume Institution. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:1759-1762. [PMID: 35469987 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability of a group of high-volume arthroplasty surgeons to simultaneously change their preferred primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant of choice to another, has not been explored in the literature to date. The main hypothesis was that such a change could be made with no significant impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the last 500 consecutive TKAs implanted of a routinely used TKA implant (NexGen; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) with the first 500 consecutive TKAs implanted of a newly adopted TKA implant (Triathlon; Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) at an institutional level. Primary outcomes of importance included all complications that occurred either intraoperatively or early postoperatively, early all-cause revision rate, and early reintervention rate. RESULTS There was a 1.2% (n = 6) complication rate in the NexGen cohort compared to 0.8% (n = 4) in the newly adopted Triathlon cohort (P = .75). The rate of intraoperative fracture was 1% in the NexGen cohort and 0.6% in the Triathlon cohort (P = .72). The early all-cause revision rate for the NexGen TKA was 1% (n = 5) compared to 0.8% (n = 4) in the Triathlon cohort (P = 1.0). The manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) rate in the NexGen cohort was 2.4% compared to 4.6% in the Triathlon cohort (P = .058). The only predictor variable associated with MUA rate was American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, where there was a significantly lower rate of MUA with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (P = .042). CONCLUSION It is possible to implement the institution-wide adoption of an established, high-performing TKA implant without any negative implications in relation to early revision rates, perioperative complication rates, and reintervention rates. This study is the first of its kind to be reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard A Sheridan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dawson E, Neufeld ME, Schemitsch E, John-Baptiste A. The impact of wait time on patient outcomes in knee and hip replacement surgery: a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev 2022; 11:38. [PMID: 35246261 PMCID: PMC8895094 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-01909-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total hip and total knee replacement surgery are in high demand, leading to long wait times for many patients. While on the waiting list, patients may experience worsening pain, reduced mobility, and deteriorating health. Given that long wait times are common for lower joint replacement surgery, it is important to understand how patient health changes during the wait period and whether this impacts patient outcomes after surgery. The aim of this scoping review will be to identify and describe the evidence regarding the impact of wait time on patient outcomes for patients who undergo total knee and total hip replacement surgery. METHODS This scoping review was designed with guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis, and results will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane electronic databases will be searched for English language articles published after 1999. Studies of adult patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary knee or hip replacement surgery, which measure patient outcomes over the wait period for surgery, will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts followed by full article review. Data will be extracted by two reviewers using a standardized form. Outcomes assessed during the wait period will be identified and described in tables. Factors associated with changes in health status during the wait period will be qualitatively described. DISCUSSION This review will map the evidence regarding wait times for lower extremity joint replacement surgery. Better understanding of how the impact of wait times on patient health status is measured over the perioperative period will inform future research on wait times. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION Registered with Open Science Framework, Feb 14, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MV4FS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Dawson
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada.
| | - M E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Orthopaedics, Complex Joint Reconstruction Clinic, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - E Schemitsch
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.,London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, PO Box 5010, Stn B, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - A John-Baptiste
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Neufeld ME, Liechti EF, Soto F, Linke P, Busch SM, Gehrke T, Citak M. High revision rates following repeat septic revision after failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:386-393. [PMID: 35227090 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b3.bjj-2021-0481.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The outcome of repeat septic revision after a failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to report the infection-free and all-cause revision-free survival of repeat septic revision after a failed one-stage exchange, and to determine whether the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) stage is associated with subsequent infection-related failure. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all repeat septic revision TKAs which were undertaken after a failed one-stage exchange between 2004 and 2017. A total of 33 repeat septic revisions (29 one-stage and four two-stage) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up from repeat septic revision was 68.2 months (8.0 months to 16.1 years). The proportion of patients who had a subsequent infection-related failure and all-cause revision was reported and Kaplan-Meier survival for these endpoints was determined. Patients were categorized according to the MSIS staging system, and the association with subsequent infection was analyzed. RESULTS At the most recent follow-up, 17 repeat septic revisions (52%) had a subsequent infection-related failure and the five-year infection-free survival was 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 39 to 74). A total of 19 underwent a subsequent all-cause revision (58%) and the five-year all-cause revision-free survival was 47% (95% CI 28 to 64). The most common indication for the first subsequent aseptic revision was loosening. The MSIS stage of the host status (p = 0.663) and limb status (p = 1.000) were not significantly associated with subsequent infection-related failure. CONCLUSION Repeat septic revision after a failed one-stage exchange TKA for PJI is associated with a high rate of subsequent infection-related failure and all-cause revision. Patients should be counselled appropriately to manage expectations. The host and limb status according to the MSIS staging system were not associated with subsequent infection-related failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):386-393.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Emanuel F Liechti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fernando Soto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Naval Almirante Nef, Viña del Mar, Chile
| | - Philip Linke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sepehri A, Howard LC, Neufeld ME, Masri BA. Compartment Syndrome After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2022; 53:25-32. [PMID: 34799019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Early diagnosis and prompt definitive management of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) are paramount in preventing the significant morbidity associated with compartment syndrome. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome can be difficult, given the pain associated with the procedure in the immediate postoperative period. Obesity, anticoagulation, postoperative epidural infusion, and prolonged operative time have been reported as risk factors for ACS. In addition to maintaining high clinical suspicion in patient with risk factors for ACS after joint replacement, emphasis on limiting modifiable risk factors should be practiced, including meticulous hemostasis, careful patient positioning, and limiting prolonged postoperative regional anesthesia when not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aresh Sepehri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Lisa C Howard
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liechti EF, Neufeld ME, Soto F, Linke P, Busch SM, Gehrke T, Citak M. Favourable outcomes of repeat one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:27-33. [PMID: 34969284 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b1.bjj-2021-0970.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS One-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is gaining popularity. The outcome for a repeat one-stage revision THA after a failed one-stage exchange for infection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to report the infection-free and all-cause revision-free survival of repeat one-stage exchange, and to investigate the association between the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) staging system and further infection-related failure. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all repeat one-stage revision THAs performed after failed one-stage exchange THA for infection between January 2008 and December 2016. The final cohort included 32 patients. The mean follow-up after repeat one-stage exchange was 5.3 years (1.2 to 13.0). The patients with a further infection-related failure and/or all-cause revision were reported, and Kaplan-Meier survival for these endpoints determined. Patients were categorized according to the MSIS system, and its association with further infection was analyzed. RESULTS A total of eight repeat septic revisions (25%) developed a further infection-related failure, and the five-year infection-free survival was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI) 57 to 92). Nine (28%) underwent a further all-cause revision and the five-year all-cause revision-free survival was 74% (95% CI 52 to 88). Neither the MSIS classification of the host status (p = 0.423) nor the limb status (p = 0.366) was significantly associated with further infection-related failure. CONCLUSION Repeat one-stage exchange for PJI in THA is associated with a favourable five-year infection-free and all-cause revision-free survival. Notably, the rate of infection control is encouraging when compared with the reported rates after repeat two-stage exchange. The results can be used to counsel patients and help clinicians make informed decisions about treatment. With the available number of patients, further infection-related failure was not associated with the MSIS host or limb status. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):27-33.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel F Liechti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lower Limb (Adult Hip & Knee) Reconstruction, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Fernando Soto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Naval de Viña del Mar Almirante Nef, Vina del Mar, Chile
| | - Philip Linke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sophia-Marlene Busch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Neufeld ME, Lanting BA, Shehata M, Howard JL, MacDonald SJ, Teeter MG, Vasarhelyi EM. Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1392-1401. [PMID: 33974575 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) of specimens taken during presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC and infection-free implant survival in this patient population. Secondary aims included identifying factors associated with subsequent infection-related failure in patients with UPC. METHODS We reviewed all THA revisions (n = 2,288) performed at our institution from 2006 to 2019. Presumed aseptic revision THAs with intraoperative culture(s) were eligible (n = 1,196), and those with UPC were included in a Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the infection-free implant survival and in Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with infection-related failure. RESULTS UPC(s) were documented for 9.2% (110) of 1,196 aseptic THA revisions. The 2- and 5-year infection-free implant survival in the entire UPC cohort was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 90.5% to 95.7%) and 86.8% (95% CI = 82.9% to 90.7%), respectively. The 2- and 5-year infection-free survival with failure due to infection with the same microorganism as identified in the UPC as the end point was 95.8% (95% CI = 93.7% to 97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI = 91.7% to 96.9%), respectively. Subsequent infection-related failures caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC were more likely to occur after revisions with ≥2 UPCs than after those with 1 UPC (p = 0.024). Revision due to adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent infection-related failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.49, 95% CI = 2.69 to 78.04). Patients with a single UPC who were not treated with antibiotics had no subsequent periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of UPC was 9.2%, and the infection-free implant survival in patients with UPC is encouraging. Implant survival free of PJI caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC was excellent. Aseptic revision for adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent PJI in patients with UPC. No patient with a single UPC who was not treated with antibiotics developed PJI caused by the UPC-identified microorganism, suggesting that in the absence of other signs of infection a single UPC does not warrant antibiotic treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Neufeld
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brent A Lanting
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Shehata
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - James L Howard
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven J MacDonald
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward M Vasarhelyi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Garceau SP, Igbokwe EN, Warschawski Y, Neufeld ME, Safir OA, Wade JP, Guy P, Wolfstadt JI. Management Options and Outcomes for Patients with Femoral Fractures with Post-Polio Syndrome of the Lower Extremity: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2020; 8:e0146. [PMID: 32487976 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Post-polio syndrome is characterized by a late functional deterioration (usually after >=15 years from the initial infection) in patients with a history of paralytic poliomyelitis infection, and it is defined by the March of Dimes criteria. Patients with post-polio syndrome are at increased risk for falls and associated hip and femoral fractures as a result of lower bone mineral density, decreased lean muscle mass, and musculoskeletal deformities.
Current evidence suggests that treatment modalities for femoral fractures should emphasize fixation that allows early progressive weight-bearing and ambulation to optimize functional outcomes. Good results after hip arthroplasty have been described with both cemented and uncemented implants in patients who have been treated for osteoarthritis, but there has been little evidence guiding hip fracture management. Anatomic challenges that are encountered are osteoporotic bone, a valgus neck-shaft angle, increased femoral anteversion, and a small femoral canal diameter.
Intramedullary nailing of hip and femoral fractures can be challenging due to the small femoral canal diameter that frequently is encountered. Alternative methods of fixation have shown promising results. These include the use of sliding hip screws for hip fracture management and fixed-angle locking plates for hip and femoral fracture management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon P Garceau
- Division of Orthopaedics, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Yaniv Warschawski
- Division of Orthopaedics, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E Neufeld
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Adult Joint Reconstruction, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Oleg A Safir
- Division of Orthopaedics, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John P Wade
- Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre Guy
- Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jesse I Wolfstadt
- Division of Orthopaedics, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Neufeld ME, Albers A, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. A Comparison of Mobile and Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:1713-1718. [PMID: 29398257 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term survivorship and functional outcomes of the mobile-bearing (MB) compared to the fixed-bearing (FB) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implant design remain a topic of debate. The aim of the current study was to compare the survivorship and functional outcomes of MB and FB UKA at a minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 106 consecutive medial UKAs (89 patients) from our institution with a minimum 10-year follow-up. The 38 MB and 68 FB knees had follow-up of 14.2 years (12.9-15.5) and 11.5 years (10.2-15.1), respectively. Validated patient-reported outcomes and radiographs were evaluated as were etiology, timing, and complexity of revision. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival was calculated with revision to total knee arthroplasty as the end point. RESULTS The 10-year survival was 82.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65.8-91.9) for MB and 90.9% (95% CI 79.4-96.2) for FB UKA (P = .102), and 88.0% (95% CI 79.3-93.2) for the entire cohort. Patient outcomes were similar between groups, as were timing and etiologies for revision to total knee arthroplasty. One-third of revisions required either stems or tibial augments, and of these, all were of MB design. CONCLUSION Survival and functional outcomes were similar between MB and FB designs. One-third of revisions required either stems or augments, all were of MB design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Neufeld
- Department of Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony Albers
- Department of Orthopaedics, McGill University, St. Mary's Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nelson V Greidanus
- Department of Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Donald S Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Neufeld ME, O'Hara NN, Zhan M, Zhai Y, Broekhuyse HM, Lefaivre KA, Abzug JM, Slobogean GP. Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery and 30-Day Outcomes. Orthopedics 2016; 39:361-368. [PMID: 27459143 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160719-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the proportion of patients admitted with a hip fracture to participating American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) hospitals who were treated within the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) time-to-hip-fracture-surgery benchmark. The secondary goals were to identify factors associated with missing the benchmark and to determine whether the benchmark was associated with improved 30-day patient outcomes. Patients aged 60 years or older who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2005 and 2013 were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database. Of the 26,066 patients who met the enrollment criteria, 71.4% were treated within the NICE benchmark. Many variables, including sex, race, procedure type, and hip fracture diagnosis, were statistically significant predictors of missing the benchmark (P<.001). Meeting the NICE benchmark was not associated with reductions in major complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.05; P=.234); however, it was associated with reductions in 30-day mortality (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P=.028), minor complications (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-0.995; P=.038), and postoperative length of stay (beta=-0.77; P<.001). Current practice at participating ACS-NSQIP hospitals is compatible with the NICE time-to-surgery benchmark. However, the findings highlight the importance of further prospective investigation to monitor the effect of early-treatment benchmarks on 30-day patient outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):361-368.].
Collapse
|