Micromotion of cementless hemispherical acetabular components. Does press-fit need adjunctive screw fixation?

AAHKS Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Inferior Screw Fixation Decreases Acetabular Component Failure Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive screw fixation has been shown to be reliable in achieving acetabular component stability in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of inferior screw placement on acetabular component failure following revision THA. We hypothesized that inferior screw fixation would decrease acetabular failure rates.

METHODS

We reviewed 250 patients who had Paprosky Type II or III defects who underwent acetabular revision between 2001 and 2021 across three institutions. Demographic factors, the number of screws, location of screw placement (superior versus inferior), use of augments and/or cup-cage constructs, Paprosky classification, and presence of discontinuity were documented. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the independent effect of inferior screw fixation on the primary outcome of aseptic rerevision of the acetabular component.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 53.4 months (range, 12 to 261), 16 patients (6.4%) required re-revision for acetabular loosening. There were 140 patients (56.0%) who had inferior screw fixation, all of whom did not have neurovascular complications during screw placement. Patients who had inferior screws had a lower rate of acetabular rerevision than those who only had superior screw fixation (2.1 versus 11.8%, P = .0030). Multivariate regression demonstrates that inferior screw fixation decreased the likelihood of rerevision for acetabular loosening when compared to superior screw fixation alone (odds ratio: 0.1, confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.5; P = .0071). No other risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior screw fixation is a safe and reliable technique to reduce acetabular component failure following revision THA in cases of severe acetabular bone loss.

Determination of a Safe Zone for Ischial Screw Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Implantation of acetabular components with supplemental screw fixation is commonly performed to improve osteointegration and long-term stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Placement of ischial screws improves stability in biomechanical studies, but can be technically challenging. The study aimed to provide a safe zone for ischial screw placement with reference to easily identifiable intra-operative landmarks.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients was performed and 27 preoperative pelvis computed tomography scans were collected. After converting these images to 3-dimensional reconstructions of the pelvis, a safe zone for ischial screw placement was established with reference to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the acetabular center and rim.

RESULTS

The safe zone of an ischial screw in the en face sagittal plane was a median of 17 degrees (interquartile range [IQR]: 11,23) anterior to 13 degrees (IQR: 10,18) posterior to the reference line from the ASIS through the center of the acetabulum. The safe zone in the coronal plane was 34 degrees (IQR: 18,68) medial to 13 degrees (IQR: 8,19) lateral from a start point 1 centimeter medial to the inferior acetabular rim with a screw length of 25 millimeters. An ischial screw optimized for length directed down the center of the ischium was qualitatively demonstrated to have a start point unobtainable intraoperatively, originating within the cotyloid fossa.

CONCLUSION

The ASIS, center of the acetabulum, and acetabular rim provide identifiable intraoperative landmarks for guiding ischial screw placement in hip arthroplasty.

Early clinical and radiological outcomes of the new porous titanium shell in combination with locking screw in revision total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Extensive acetabular bone loss and poor bone quality are two key challenges often encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty. A new 3D-printed porous acetabular shell has been made available with the option to insert multiple variable-angle locking screws. We sought to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of this construct.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients operated by two surgeons was performed in a single institution. Fifty-nine revision hip arthroplasties were performed in 55 patients (34 female; mean age 68.8 ± 12.3 years) for Paprosky defects I (n = 21), IIA/B (n = 22), IIC (n = 9), III (n = 7) between February 2018 and January 2022 using the novel porous titanium acetabular shell and multiple variable angle locking screws. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were locally maintained. Patient-reported outcome measures collected included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score, and the 12-item Short Form Survey.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 25.7 ± 13.9 months, two cases of shell migration were noted. One patient had a failed constrained mechanism and received revision to a cemented dual mobility liner. No other acetabular shells showed any evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. Preoperatively, 21 defects were classified as Paprosky grade I, 19 grade IIA, 3 grade IIB, 9 IIC, 4 grade IIIA, and 3 IIIB. The mean postoperative WOMAC function score was 84 (SD 17), WOMAC (stiffness) 83 (SD 15), WOMAC (pain) 85 (SD 15), and WOMAC (global) 85 (SD 17). The mean postoperative OHS was 83 (SD 15), and mean SF-12 physical score was 44 (SD 11).

CONCLUSION

The additional augmentation of porous metal acetabular shells with multiple variable-angle locking screws provides reliable initial fixation with good clinical and radiological outcomes in the short term. Further studies are needed to establish the medium- and long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Extended Ischiopubic Fixation Using Porous Metal Augments in Cementless Acetabular Reconstruction during Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objectives

The aims of this study were to introduce the definition, indication, and surgical technique of extended ischiopubic fixation (EIF) and to investigate the early clinical, radiographic results and complications of hips revised with EIF.

Methods

Patients who underwent revision THA utilizing the technique of EIF which was defined as securing the porous metal augment >5 mm deep into the ischium and/or pubic ramus to gain adequate mechanical support and fresh host bone for bony ingrowth in a single institution from February 2015 to February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 hips (28 patients) were eligible for the study and were enrolled. Four patients were lost to follow‐up postoperatively. The data of the remaining 24 patients (26 hips) were analyzed. The patients' clinical results were assessed using of the Harris Hip Score and any complications including postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, postoperative periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma or wound complication were documented. The radiographic results were assessed with the construct stability, the position of the center of rotation, and cup orientation.

Results

The median age of these 25 patients was 62.00 (interquartile: 54.25–68.25) years, with a median body mass index (BMI) of 22.60 kg/m² (interquartile: 21.49–25.12 kg/m²). A total of 12 (48%) patients were female. At a median duration of follow‐up of 49.16 months, 20 (80%) patients rated their satisfaction level as “very satisfied,” five (20%) were “satisfied.” The median HHS improved from 36.00 (interquartile range: 31.25–49.75) preoperatively to 81.00 (interquartile range: 74.75–88.25) at the most recent follow‐up (p < 0.001). No complications such as periprosthetic joint infection, intraoperative fracture, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, nerve palsy, hematoma, or wound complication were identified. All constructs were considered to have obtained stable fixation. The median vertical and horizontal distance between the latest postoperative centers of rotation to the anatomic center of rotation improved from 13.62 and 8.68 mm preoperatively to 4.42 and 4.19 mm at final follow‐up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Early follow‐up of patients reconstructed with porous metal augments using the EIF technique demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with no particular complications, stable fixation, and restoration of the center of rotation.

Defining the canal for ischial and pubic screws in cup revision surgery

Purpose

When revising acetabular cups, it is often necessary to provide additional stabilisation with screws. In extensive defect situations, the placement of screws caudally in the ischium and/or pubis is biomechanically advantageous. Especially after multiple revision operations, the surgeon is confronted with a reduced bone stock and unclear or altered anatomy. In addition, screw placement caudally is associated with greater risk. Therefore, the present study aims to identify and define safe zones for the placement of caudal acetabular screws.

Methods

Forty-three complete CT datasets were used for the evaluation. Sixty-three distinctive 3D points representing bone landmark of interests were defined. The coordinates of these points were then used to calculate all the parameters. For simplified visualisation and intra-operative reproducibility, an analogue clock was used, with 12 o’clock indicating cranial and 6 o’clock caudal.

Results

A consistent accumulation was found at around 4.5 ± 0.3 hours for the ischium and 7.9 ± 0.3 hours for the pubic bone.

Conclusions

The anatomy of the ischium and pubis is sufficiently constant to allow the positioning of screws in a standardised way. The interindividual variation is low — regardless of gender — so that the values determined can be used to position screws safely in the ischium and pubis. The values determined can provide the surgeon with additional orientation intra-operatively when placing caudal acetabular screws.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium

Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.

The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up

Purpose

The cementless implantation of hip replacement cups may be performed with and without the additional use of acetabular screws. If the surgeon uses screws or not depends on variable factors. In general, the use of screws is intended to increase the primary stability of the cup. Whether screws increase the initial stability of the cup construct, or even reduce it in part, is the subject of considerable debate in the literature. It is also unclear whether the additional screws lead to increased wear or increased periacetabular osteolysis over the long-term course.

Methods

Two hundred eleven patients from a previous study with a minimum follow-up of 10.7 years were included. Of these, 68 patients with 82 total hip arthroplasties (THA) were given clinical and radiological follow-up examinations. Of these, 52 had been fitted without screws and 30 with screws. On the basis of radiographs, annual wear and osteolysis were quantified. The clinical results were recorded by means of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC scores.

Results

Significantly more periacetabular osteolysis was found if additive acetabular screws had been used. No difference was found in relation to the volumetric wear per year. Likewise, no difference was found with regard to the clinical scores.

Conclusions

The use of additive acetabular screws leads to increased osteolysis in the periacetabular bone stock. Insofar as the primary stability of the cementless cup construct allows it, no additional acetabular screws should be used.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00264-021-05219-7.

Acetabular screws do not improve early revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty. An instrumented registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Initial stability of uncemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for osseointegration and potentially enhanced by screw fixation. We used Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry data to determine whether screw usage influences uncemented acetabular component survival.

METHODS

Primary THA with uncemented acetabular components performed for osteoarthritis from 1999 to 2018 was included. Survivorship was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative percent revision (CPR). Comparisons used Cox proportional hazards method. An instrumental variable analysis adjusted for surgeon preference for screws as a confounding factor was used.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty thousand one hundred ninety-two THAs were included (31.8% with screws, 68.2% without). Two hundred twenty thousand six hundred seven were included in the instrumental variable analysis. Revision rate of acetabular components (all causes) was higher with screws during the first six years (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% CI 1.34, 1.57), p < 0.001) and lower thereafter (HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67, 0.98), p = 0.027). Revision rate of acetabular components for loosening was higher with screws over the entire study period (HR = 1.73 (95% CI 1.51, 1.98), p < 0.001). Overall THA revision rate was higher with screws during the first six years (HR = 1.20 (95% CI 1.15, 1.26), p < 0.001) but lower thereafter (HR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.81, 0.98), p = 0.020). Revision rate for dislocation was higher with screws over the entire period (HR = 1.16 (95% CI 1.06, 1.26), p < 0.001). Instrumental variable analysis revealed higher revision rates with acetabular screws in the first six years. (HR = 1.18 (95% CI 1.09-1.29), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Screws did not confer a protective effect against acetabular loosening and were not associated with long-term negative consequences.

A novel micromotion measurement method to gain instructive insight into the acetabular bone-implant interface

In total hip arthroplasty insufficient primary stability with excessive bone-implant micromotion is a major reason for aseptic loosening at the acetabular cup implant. In the literature, several methods were proposed for in vitro micromotion measurement, but none is capable of six degrees of freedom measurement at a large number of measuring points over the entire acetabular bone-implant interface, which was the aim of the current scientific work. A pin-sleeve sensor system was developed and an appropriate installing technique was incorporated. Micromotions were transmitted from the internal interface to the accessible periphery. Motion data of the sensors were optically tracked. A calculation algorithm was conceived, discretizing superimposed rotational and translational components. The method was tested and subsequently applied to a cementless revision cup implanted into an artificial hemipelvic bone featuring a typical bone defect. Using eighteen sensors in positions across the acetabular bone-implant interface, micromotion magnitudes from 59 µm ± 2 µm to 222 µm ± 5 µm were detected. Allocation of micromotion complied with case specific anticipations. The novel pin-sleeve sensors transmitted interface micromotion to the accessible periphery as desired. The measurement method enables instructive insights into three-dimensional bone-implant micromotion and may prospectively be used to evaluate different implant systems.

Selective screw fixation is associated with early failure of primary acetabular components for aseptic loosening

Selective supplementation of acetabular component fixation with a screw during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) assumes that the surgeon can detect when an acetabular component needs additional stability. In contrast, nonselective screw users do not alter their practice based on their interpretation of stability and either use screws all or none of the time. We aimed to determine the effect of selective screw use on aseptic acetabular component loosening. We retrospectively reviewed aseptic failures of acetabular components after primaty THA. We compared the survivorship of selective and nonselective supplementation of acetabular fixation with respect to time to revision, obesity, and screw use. Selective screw use (n = 16) was associated with earlier acetabular component aseptic loosening (median: 1.9 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.1-5.0) compared to nonselective screw use (n = 22; median: 5.6 years; IQR: 2.0-15.3; P = .010). Selective screw use was independently associated with earlier revision after adjusting for patient obesity. Obesity was associated with selective screw use in 50% of the cases vs 14% of nonselective cases (odds ratio: 6.3; confidence interval: 1.2-25.2; P = .028), possibly reflecting the increased difficulty in achieving acetabular component stability in this and other settings with compromised bone. Surgeons should carefully assess component stability at time of primary THA. If the acetabulum is not stable, the addition of screws alone may not be sufficient for acetabular component stability.

Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models

The total number of total hip arthroplasties is increasing every year, and approximately 10% of these surgeries are revisions. New implant design and surgical techniques are evolving quickly and demand accurate preclinical evaluation. The initial stability of cementless implants is one of the main concerns of these preclinical evaluations. A broad range of initial stability test methods is currently used, which can be categorized into two main groups: Load-to-failure tests and relative micromotion measurements. Measuring relative micromotion between implant and bone is recognized as the golden standard for implant stability testing as this micromotion is directly linked to the long-term fixation of cementless implants. However, specific custom-made set-ups are required to measure this micromotion, with the result that numerous studies opt to perform more straightforward load-to-failure tests. A custom-made micromotion test set-up for artificial acetabular bone models was developed and used to compare load-to-failure (implant push-out test) with micromotion and to assess the influence of bone material properties and press-fit on the implant stability. The results showed a high degree of correlation between micromotion and load-to-failure stability metrics, which indicates that load-to-failure stability tests can be an appropriate estimator of the primary stability of acetabular implants. Nevertheless, micromotions still apply as the golden standard and are preferred when high accuracy is necessary. Higher bone density resulted in an increase in implant stability. An increase of press-fit from 0.7 mm to 1.2 mm did not significantly increase implant stability.

Inferior extended fixation utilizing porous titanium augments improves primary anti-rotational stability of the acetabular component

BACKGROUND

The primary anti-rotational stability is critical to preventing cup tilting failure following revision total hip arthroplasty, but is frequently compromised by severe ischial bone loss. A novel technique of "inferior extended fixation" was introduced by securing a porous metal augment into the deficient ischium. This study evaluated the effect of this technique on primary anti-rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Composite hemipelvis specimens, acetabular components and "lotus" augments were used to simulate total hip arthroplasty surgeries. Three different cementless operative settings of cup implantation were simulated: (1) native ischium without defects; (2) ischium with a defect not reconstructed; (3) ischial defect reconstructed with inferior extended fixation using a lotus augment. Lever-out testing was used to examine primary anti-rotational stability, which was measured as interface stiffness and yield moment.

FINDINGS

Compared with the native ischium setting, the mean interface stiffness decreased by 53.1% in the ischial defect setting (p < 0.001). In the inferior extended fixation setting, the mean value was 110% greater than that in the ischial defect setting (p = 0.014), and comparable to that in the native ischium setting (p = 1). Similar results were observed for the yield moment (declined by 63.1%, p < 0.001; 200% higher, p < 0.001; and p = 0.395; respectively).

INTERPRETATION

In revision total hip arthroplasty with severe ischial defects, inferior extended fixation with a lotus porous titanium augment restores anti-rotational stability of the acetabular component to the level of that with a native ischium, which provides the mechanical environment for bone ingrowth and prevents cup tilting failure.

Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty complications are associated with mechanical loosening of the acetabular component, which may be attributed to the type of fixation used (press fit, trans-cortical screws, cancellous screws). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for fixation of the acetabular shell.

METHODS

Five cadaveric pelvis specimens were hemisected (N = 10) at the sacroiliac joint. Each hemi-pelvis was initially tested with a press fit cup followed by the left and right pairs being randomized to either a cancellous or trans-cortical screw condition. Each fixation was tested by applying a load to a rod inserted into the centre of the acetabular cup at 0.5 mm/s, until failure occurred. The failure force, failure moment, and the rotation angle of the cup at failure were calculated.

FINDINGS

The cups fixated with a trans-cortical screw failed at a significantly greater mean [SD] force (1046.20 [386.52] N). The trans-cortical screws also significantly increased the angle of failure 46.29 (16.90) ° compared to the press-fit cups (6.73 [4.59] °). Finally, there was a significant increase in the failure moment, such that, the trans-cortical condition failed at a mean (SD) moment of 53.75 (16.24) Nm compared to 9.59 (1.85) Nm and 32.15 (18.16) Nm for the press fit and cancellous (p = 0.044) conditions, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The acetabular shells that were fixated with trans-cortical screws provide greater stability compared to the press-fit cups or cancellous screws.

Changes in acetabular component alignment due to screw fixation in patients with hip dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

Adequate initial stability of the acetabular cup is essential for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, changes in the alignment of the acetabular component caused by screw fixation are concerning in patients with inadequate bone stock. This study aimed to investigate the effects of screw fixation on the alignment of the acetabular component in THA patients with hip dysplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 256 hips (range 28-87 years) that underwent THA using a navigation system. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of changes in the alignment of the intraoperative acetabular cup, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that were predictive of changes in acetabular component alignment after screw fixation in 2 dimensions: inclination and anteversion.

RESULTS

Screw fixation led to a mean change in inclination of 1.6° (range 0-10°) and a mean change in anteversion of 1.4° (range 0-14°). The Crowe classification, the presence of bone cysts, and the use of an inferior quadrant screw were identified as factors that correlated with acetabular cup alignment changes in inclination (odds ratios, 6.01, 5.94 and 0.03, respectively). Only the Crowe classification was identified as a factor that correlated with intraoperative alignment changes in anteversion (odds ratio, 2.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Screw fixation altered the acetabular cup alignment. The inclination changes were related to the extent of the dysplasia, and the risk was reduced when the inferior quadrant screw was used. Surgeons should use caution during screw fixation in THAs performed on severely dysplastic hips.

Cementless total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation for femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures: A comparative study with 3-13 years' follow-up of 96 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative outcomes of cementless Total hip arthroplasty (THA) following failed internal fixation for femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures.

METHOD

Ninety-six cementless THAs for failed internal fixation after femoral neck fracture (59, group I) and intertrochanteric fracture (37, group II) with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were analyzed. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed on all patients.

RESULTS

The intraoperative blood loss and operating time were significantly increased in group II (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). Harris hip score at last follow-up was significantly improved in group I (p = 0.007) but, there were no differences in hospital stay, Koval score at last follow-up, and perioperative complications between both groups. Long femoral stems for diaphyseal fitting were frequently used in group II (32/37, 86%) (p = 0.001). Radiographically, none of the acetabular cups showed evidence of migration, loosening. All cases showed stable fixation of the femoral stem at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of cementless THA following failed internal fixation for femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures were satisfactory; increased intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and requirement of long femoral stem should be considered in the latter type of fracture.

Influence of soft tissue in the assessment of the primary fixation of acetabular cup implants using impact analyses

BACKGROUND

The acetabular cup (AC) implant primary stability is an important determinant for the success of cementless hip surgery but it remains difficult to assess the AC implant fixation in the clinic. A method based on the analysis of the impact produced by an instrumented hammer on the ancillary has been developed by our group (Michel et al., 2016a). However, the soft tissue thickness present around the acetabulum may affect the impact response, which may hamper the robustness of the method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of the soft tissue thickness (STT) on the acetabular cup implant primary fixation evaluation using impact analyses.

METHODS

To do so, different AC implants were inserted in five bovine bone samples. For each sample, different stability conditions were obtained by changing the cavity diameter. For each configuration, the AC implant was impacted 25 times with 10 and 30 mm of soft tissues positioned underneath the sample. The averaged indicator I_m was determined based on the amplitude of the signal for each configuration and each STT and the pull-out force was measured.

FINDINGS

The results show that the resonance frequency of the system increases when the value of the soft tissue thickness decreases. Moreover, an ANOVA analysis shows that there was no significant effect of the value of soft tissue thickness on the values of the indicator I_m (F = 2.33; p-value = 0.13).

INTERPRETATION

This study shows that soft tissue thickness does not appear to alter the prediction of the acetabular cup implant primary fixation obtained using the impact analysis approach, opening the path towards future clinical trials.

Ex Vivo Evaluation of Cementless Acetabular Cup Stability Using Impact Analyses with a Hammer Instrumented with Strain Sensors

The acetabular cup (AC) implant stability is determinant for the success of cementless hip arthroplasty. A method based on the analysis of the impact force applied during the press-fit insertion of the AC implant using a hammer instrumented with a force sensor was developed to assess the AC implant stability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the performance of a method using a hammer equipped with strain sensors to retrieve the AC implant stability. Different AC implants were inserted in five bovine samples with different stability conditions leading to 57 configurations. The AC implant was impacted 16 times by the two hammers consecutively. For each impact; an indicator I_S (respectively I_F) determined by analyzing the time variation of the signal corresponding to the averaged strain (respectively force) obtained with the stress (respectively strain) hammer was calculated. The pull-out force F was measured for each configuration. F was significantly correlated with I_S (R² = 0.79) and I_F (R² = 0.80). The present method has the advantage of not modifying the shape of the hammer that can be sterilized easily. This study opens new paths towards the development of a decision support system to assess the AC implant stability.

Biomechanical research on contour cage with transacetabular screws fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Use biomechanical technique to access the strain distribution and stability of Contour anti-protrusion cage with or without the whole circumference acetabular cup fixation by the transacetabular screws.

METHODS

Pelvic specimens from 10 male cadavers were used for the biomechanical test. The models of type C bone defect were copied according to the AAOS classification. Group 1: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed only by flange screws; Group 2: the contour reconstruction ring was fixed both by flange screws and transacetabular screws in dome. Under load in Heel Strike, Midstance, and Toe off phase, the transverse and longitudinal strains were measured in both the superior measure site near the root of the iliac wing and the inferior measure site near the root of the ischium. The relative displacement between the anterior inferior spine and the root of ischium below acetabular component was also measured.

FINDINGS

Compared with Group 1, the transverse and longitudinal pressure strain of Group 2 on the superior measure site decreased, and measure sites also showed reductions on the inferior under load under three different gait phases. The result of mean relative displacement showed transacetabular screws fixation couldn't provide significant improvement of displacement prevention.

INTERPRETATION

Biomechanical test showed that under the premise of a satisfied bone allograft and well-fixed flange screws in iliac and ischium, the satisfactory initial stability of the reconstruction cup can be achieved, but could not be improved by transacetabular screw technique. However, the max strain in root part of the flange will be reduced using transacetabular screws in ilium, pubis and ischium together, and the strain distribution will also be improved.

Assessing the Acetabular Cup Implant Primary Stability by Impact Analyses: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The primary stability of the acetabular cup (AC) implant is an important determinant for the long term success of cementless hip surgery. However, it remains difficult to assess the AC implant stability due to the complex nature of the bone-implant interface. A compromise should be found when inserting the AC implant in order to obtain a sufficient implant stability without risking bone fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of impact signals analyses to assess the primary stability of AC implants inserted in cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

AC implants with various sizes were inserted in 12 cadaveric hips following the same protocol as the one employed in the clinic, leading to 86 different configurations. A hammer instrumented with a piezoelectric force sensor was then used to measure the variation of the force as a function of time produced during the impact between the hammer and the ancillary. Then, an indicator I was determined for each impact based on the impact momentum. For each configuration, twelve impacts were realized with the hammer, the value of the maximum amplitude being comprised between 2500 and 4500 N, which allows to determine an averaged value IM of the indicator for each configuration. The pull-out force F was measured using a tangential pull-out biomechanical test.

RESULTS

A significant correlation (R2 = 0.69) was found between IM and F when pooling all data, which indicates that information related to the AC implant biomechanical stability can be retrieved from the analysis of impact signals obtained in cadavers.

CONCLUSION

These results open new paths in the development of a medical device that could be used in the future in the operative room to help orthopedic surgeons adapt the surgical protocol in a patient specific manner.

The effects of musculoskeletal loading regimes on numerical evaluations of acetabular component

The importance of clinical studies notwithstanding, the failure assessment of implant–bone structure has alternatively been carried out using finite element analysis. However, the accuracy of the finite element predicted results is dependent on the applied loading and boundary conditions. Nevertheless, most finite element–based evaluations on acetabular component used a few selective load cases instead of the eight load cases representing the entire gait cycle. These in silico evaluations often suffer from limitations regarding the use of simplified musculoskeletal loading regimes. This study attempts to analyse the influence of three different loading regimes representing a gait cycle, on numerical evaluations of acetabular component. Patient-specific computer tomography scan-based models of intact and resurfaced pelvises were used. One such loading regime consisted of the second load case that corresponded to peak hip joint reaction force. Whereas the other loading regime consisted of the second and fifth load cases, which corresponded to peak hip joint reaction force and peak muscle forces, respectively. The third loading regime included all the eight load cases. Considerable deviations in peri-acetabular strains, standard error ranging between 115 and 400 µε, were observed for different loading regimes. The predicted bone strains were lower when selective loading regimes were used. Despite minor quantitative variations in bone density changes (less than 0.15 g cm−3), the final bone density pattern after bone remodelling was found to be similar for all the loading regimes. Underestimations in implant–bone micromotions (40–50 µm) were observed for selective loading regimes after bone remodelling. However, at immediate post-operative condition, such underestimations were found to be less (less than 5 µm). The predicted results highlight the importance of inclusion of eight load cases representing the gait cycle for in silico evaluations of resurfaced pelvis.

No effect of additional screw fixation of a cementless, all-polyethylene press-fit socket on migration, wear, and clinical outcome

Background and purpose - Additional screw fixation of the all-polyethylene press-fit RM cup (Mathys) has no additional value for migration, in the first 2 years after surgery. However, the medium-term and long-term effects of screw fixation remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the influence of screw fixation on migration, wear, and clinical outcome at 6.5 years using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients and methods - This study involved prolonged follow-up from a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT). We analyzed RSA radiographs taken at baseline and at 1-, 2-, and 6.5-year follow-up. Cup migration and wear were assessed using model-based RSA software. Wear was calculated as translation of the femoral head model in relation to the cup model. Total translation, rotation, and wear were calculated mathematically from results of the orthogonal components. Results - 27 patients (15 with screw fixation and 12 without) were available for follow-up at 6.5 (5.6-7.2) years. Total translation (0.50 mm vs. 0.56 mm) and rotation (1.01 degrees vs. 1.33 degrees) of the cup was low, and was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Wear increased over time, and was similar between the 2 groups (0.58 mm vs. 0.53 mm). Wear rate (0.08 mm/year vs. 0.09 mm/year) and clinical outcomes were also similar. Interpretation - Our results indicate that additional screw fixation of all-polyethylene press-fit RM cups has no additional value regarding medium-term migration and clinical outcome. The wear rate was low in both groups.

Does Increased Coefficient of Friction of Highly Porous Metal Increase Initial Stability at the Acetabular Interface?

BACKGROUND

Highly porous metal acetabular components illustrate a decreased rate of aseptic loosening in short-term follow-up compared with previous registry data. This study compared the effect of component surface roughness at the bone-implant interface and the quality of the bone on initial pressfit stability. The null hypothesis is that a standard porous coated acetabular cup would show no difference in initial stability as compared with a highly porous acetabular cup when subjected to a bending moment. Second, would bone mineral density (BMD) be a significant variable under these test conditions.

METHODS

In a cadaveric model, acetabular cup micromotion was measured during a 1-time cantilever bending moment applied to 2 generations of pressfit acetabular components. BMD data were also obtained from the femoral necks available for associated specimen.

RESULTS

The mean bending moment at 150 μm was not found to be significantly different for Gription (24.6 ± 14.0 N m) cups vs Porocoat (25 ± 10.2 N m; P > .84). The peak bending moment tolerated by Gription cups (33.9 ± 20.3 N m) was not found to be significantly different from Porocoat (33.5 ± 12.2 N m; P > .92). No correlation between BMD and bending moment at 150 μm of displacement could be identified.

CONCLUSION

The coefficient of friction provided by highly porous metal acetabular shells used in this study did not provide better resistance to migration under bending load when compared with a standard porous coated component.

Ex vivo estimation of cementless acetabular cup stability using an impact hammer

Obtaining primary stability of acetabular cup (AC) implants is one of the main objectives of press-fit procedures used for cementless hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the AC implant primary stability can be evaluated using the signals obtained with an impact hammer. A hammer equipped with a force sensor was used to impact the AC implant in 20 bovine bone samples. For each sample, different stability conditions were obtained by changing the cavity diameter. For each configuration, the inserted AC implant was impacted four times with a maximum force comprised between 2500 and 4500 N. An indicator I was determined based on the partial impulse estimation and the pull-out force was measured. The implant stability and the value of the indicator I reached a maximum value for an interference fit equal to 1 mm for 18 out of 20 samples. When pooling all samples and all configurations, the implant stability and I were significantly correlated (R(2) = 0.83). The AC implant primary stability can be assessed through the analysis of the impact force signals obtained using an impact hammer. Based on these ex vivo results, a medical device could be developed to provide a decision support system to the orthopedic surgeons.

A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups

Initial stability is an essential prerequisite to achieve osseointegration of press-fit acetabular cups in total hip replacements. Most in vitro methods that assess cup stability do not reproduce physiological loading conditions and use simplified acetabular models with a spherical cavity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bone density and acetabular geometry on cup stability using a novel method for measuring acetabular cup micromotion. A press-fit cup was inserted into Sawbones® foam blocks having different densities to simulate normal and osteoporotic bone variations and different acetabular geometries. The stability of the cup was assessed in two ways: (a) measurement of micromotion of the cup in 6 degrees of freedom under physiological loading and (b) uniaxial push-out tests. The results indicate that changes in bone substrate density and acetabular geometry affect the stability of press-fit acetabular cups. They also suggest that cups implanted into weaker, for example, osteoporotic, bone are subjected to higher levels of micromotion and are therefore more prone to loosening. The decrease in stability of the cup in the physiological model suggests that using simplified spherical cavities to model the acetabulum over-estimates the initial stability of press-fit cups. This novel testing method should provide the basis for a more representative protocol for future pre-clinical evaluation of new acetabular cup designs.

Does surface roughness influence the primary stability of acetabular cups? A numerical and experimental biomechanical evaluation

Most acetabular cups implanted today are press-fit impacted cementless. Anchorage begins with the primary stability given by insertion of a slightly oversized cup. This primary stability is key to obtaining bone ingrowth and secondary stability. We tested the hypothesis that primary stability of the cup is related to surface roughness of the implant, using both an experimental and a numerical models to analyze how three levels of surface roughness (micro, macro and combined) affect the primary stability of the cup. We also investigated the effect of differences in diameter between the cup and its substrate, and of insertion force, on the cups' primary stability. The results of our study show that primary stability depends on the surface roughness of the cup. The presence of macro-roughness on the peripheral ring is found to decrease primary stability; there was excessive abrasion of the substrate, damaging it and leading to poor primary stability. Numerical modeling indicates that oversizing the cup compared to its substrate has an impact on primary stability, as has insertion force.

Initial stability of press-fit acetabular components under rotational forces

The primary goal of this study was to determine the initial press-fit stability in acetabular components without screw fixation. Mechanical testing was performed with the implantation of press-fit acetabular components in cadaveric specimens. No significant difference was found in load to failure testing between 1 and 2 mm of under-reaming. However, there was significant variability in bending forces required to create 150 μm of micromotion ranging from 49.3 N to 214.4 N. This study shows that cups implanted in a press-fit fashion, which are felt to be clinically stable, have high degrees of variability in resisting load and may be at risk for loosening. There is a need for more objective intra-operative techniques to test cup stability.

Polyaxial locking and compression screws improve construct stiffness of acetabular cup fixation: a biomechanical study

Bone ingrowth into uncemented acetabular components requires intimate cup-bone contact and rigid fixation, which can be difficult to achieve in revision hip arthroplasty. This study compares polyaxial compression locking screws with non-locked and cancellous screw constructs for acetabular cup fixation. An acetabular cup modified with screw holes to provide both compression and angular stability was implanted into a bone substitute. Coronal lever out, axial torsion and push-out tests were performed with an Instron testing machine, measuring load versus displacement. Polyaxial locking compression screws significantly improved construct stiffness compared with non-locked or cancellous screws. This increased construct stiffness will likely reduce interfacial micromotion. Further research is required to determine whether this will improve bone ingrowth in vivo and reduce cup failure.

High short-term loosening rates with the Wagner Standard Cup

The stability of prosthetic fixation is to a large extent dependent on component design. The purpose of this study is to analyze the short-term radiological results obtained with the Wagner Standard Cup in primary hip arthroplasty. An assessment was made of one hundred primary hip arthroplasties. The radiological evaluation revealed bone ingrowth in 37 of cases, fibrous integration in 49 and loosening in 14. In summary, osseointegration of the Wagner Standard Cup was unsuccessful in a high percentage of cases. This finding, which was unrelated to the type of stem or bearing surface used, bore a statistically significant relation (P<0.05) with an observed poor bone coverage of the acetabular component. Although insufficient bone coverage could arguably be attributable to a poor surgical technique, we would tend to agree with other authors that it is rather likely to result from a flawed implant design that impedes osseointegration.

Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins

PURPOSE

This experimental study was undertaken to examine the fixation characteristics of a six-finned acetabular cup in both primary and revision arthroplasty in comparison with two other commonly used cup designs without fins.

METHODS

All three cup designs (Ananova® [Intraplant], Plasmacup® NSC [Aesculap]; Exceed ABT™ [Biomet]) were implanted into validated models of normal and revision acetabula. The defect models were designed to simulate a dorso-cranial rim defect of 90° width and 10 mm in depth (moderate rim defect) and a dorso-cranial rim defect of 130° width and 15 mm in depth (severe rim defect). The fixation strength of the three cup designs was tested by cyclically edge-loading the implanted cups using a mechanical testing machine.

RESULTS

The six-finned Ananova implant exhibited greater resistance to foam-cup interface motion than both the Plasmacup and Exceed ABT implants. The largest average differences were observed in the resistance to ultimate spin-out, with Ananova outperforming Exceed ABT and Plasmacup by 26% and 17% in the moderate and by 36% and 38% in the severe defect models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The six-finned Ananova cup was significantly more resistant to edge loading both in the normal acetabulum and in acetabula with moderate to severe dorso-cranial rim defects than cup designs without fins, indicating that it may cover a wider range of clinical indications than conventional press-fit cups and provide clinicians with the confidence that, in primary and simple revision arthroplasty, adequate fixation strength can be obtained.

A cementless, elastic press-fit socket with and without screws

BACKGROUND

The acetabular component has remained the weakest link in hip arthroplasty regarding achievement of long-term survival. Primary fixation is a prerequisite for long-term performance. For this reason, we investigated the stability of a unique cementless titanium-coated elastic monoblock socket and the influence of supplementary screw fixation.

PATIENT AND METHODS

During 2006-2008, we performed a randomized controlled trial on 37 patients (mean age 63 years (SD 7), 22 females) in whom we implanted a cementless press-fit socket. The socket was implanted with additional screw fixation (group A, n = 19) and without additional screw fixation (group B, n = 18). Using radiostereometric analysis with a 2-year follow-up, we determined the stability of the socket. Clinically relevant migration was defined as > 1 mm translation and > 2º rotation. Clinical scores were determined.

RESULTS

The sockets without screw fixation showed a statistically significantly higher proximal translation compared to the socket with additional screw fixation. However, this higher migration was below the clinically relevant threshold. The numbers of migratory sockets were not significantly different between groups. After the 2-year follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between groups A and B regarding the clinical scores. 1 patient dropped out of the study. In the others, no sockets were revised.

INTERPRETATION

We found that additional screw fixation is not necessary to achieve stability of the cementless press-fit elastic RM socket. We saw no postoperative benefit or clinical effect of additional screw fixation.

Validation of FE micromotions and strains around a press-fit cup: introducing a new micromotion measuring technique

Finite element (FE) analysis provides an useful tool with which to analyze the potential performance of implantations in a variety of surgical, patient and design scenarios. To enable the use of FE analysis in the investigation of such implants, models must be experimentally validated. Validation of a pelvic model with an implanted press-fit cup in terms of micromotion and strain is presented here. A new method of micromotion has been introduced to better describe the overall movement of the cup within the pelvis. The method uses a digitizing arm to monitor the relative movement between markers on the cup and the surrounding acetabulum. FE analysis was used to replicate an experimental set up using a synthetic hemi-pelvis with a press-fitted all-metal cup, subject to the maximum loading observed during normal walking. The work presented here has confirmed the ability of FE models to accurately describe the mechanical performance of the press-fitted acetabulum and surrounding bone under typical loading conditions in terms of micromotion and strain distribution, but has demonstrated limitations in its ability to predict numerical micromotion values. A promising digitizing technique for measuring acetabular micromotions has also been introduced.

Migration and wear of the Duraloc "1200 series" cup associated with Enduron UHWMPE using the EBRA method and the Imagika software

We report a retrospective study on 122 THA using Duraloc "1200 series" cups. All patients received a 28-mm head (107 Al2O3, 15 CoCr). The mean age of the patients at surgery was 56.3 years and the mean follow-up was 137 months.Mean migration at two years using the EBRA method was 0.18 mm cranially and 0.16 mm medially. Mean polyethylene wear was 0.03 mm/year using the Imagika software and 0.06 mm/year using EBRA. Only one patient presented with abnormal polyethylene wear of 1.7 mm at 90 months with Imagika and 2.4 mm with EBRA. The Duraloc cup seems to be a reliable implant in respect of bone fixation and resistance to wear.

Does ischial screw fixation improve mechanical stability in revision total hip arthroplasty?

Ischial screw fixation, albeit technically challenging, is postulated to provide additional mechanical stability in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hemipelvis specimens were prepared to simulate revision THA, and an acetabular component with supplemental screw fixation was implanted. Three configurations were tested: 2 dome screws alone, 2 dome screws plus an additional screw within the dome, and 2 dome screws plus an ischial screw. Force displacement data were acquired during mechanical testing. An increase in mechanical stability was observed in acetabular components with supplemental screw fixation into either the posterior column or ischium (P≤.031) compared to isolated dome fixation. In addition, supplemental ischial screw fixation may provide a modest advantage over a screw placed posteroinferiorly within the acetabular dome during revision THA.

The effects of acetabular shell deformation and liner thickness on frictional torque in ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular bearings

The purposes of this study were to determine if there were differences in the frictional torque generated between spherical acetabular shells and acetabular shells deformed as a result of implantation and to evaluate how changes in polyethylene insert thickness and head diameter affected these frictional torque data. An established bench top model was used for mechanical testing. A total of 70 samples were tested. Acetabular shells were impacted into polyurethane foam that was designed to create spherical or deformed shell models. We found that deformed acetabular shells produced higher frictional torque than spherical shells. Also, larger femoral head sizes produced greater frictional torque than smaller femoral head sizes. For the deformed models, the thicker polyethylene inserts produced greater frictional torque than the thinner polyethylene inserts.

Cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws: analysis of stability and migration

The purpose of this study was to compare initial stability and late migration of 775 cementless acetabular components with and without screw fixation. Screw fixation was used in 509 cups and no screws in 266 cups. Average follow-up in the screw fixation group was 6.32 years (range, 2-10 years) and 6.9 years (range, 2-10 years) in the no-screw group. One component (0.2%, osteolysis) in the screw group and one (0.4%, loss of fixation) in the no-screw group required revision. Osteolytic lesions more than 4 cm(2) were noted in 8 (1.6%) screw fixation cups and 2 (0.75%) no-screw fixation cups. No cups in either cohort had radiographic evidence of migration. Screw fixation did not have a favorable or adverse effect on the outcome of acetabular reconstruction.

Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup in artificial foam bone of different qualities

Acetabular cup loosening is one of the major failure models of total hip replacement (THR), which is mostly due to insufficient initial stability of the cup. Previous studies have demonstrated that cup stability is affected by the quality of the host bone and the surgical skill when inserting screws. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects on the initial stability of the acetabular cup of eccentric screws in bone of different qualities. In this study, hemispherical cups were fixed into bone specimens constructed from artificial foam with three elastic moduli using one to three screws. The effects of two types of screw eccentricity (offset and angular) on the stability of the acetabular cup were also evaluated. The experimental results indicate that in the presence of ideal screwing, the cup was stable in bone specimens constructed from foam with the highest elastic modulus. In addition, increasing the number of ideal screws enhanced the cup stability, especially in bone specimens constructed from soft foam. Moreover, the cup stability was most affected by offset eccentric screw(s) in the hard-foam bone specimens and by angular eccentric screw(s) in the soft-foam bone specimens. The reported results indicate that the presence of screw eccentricity affects the initial stability of the acetabular cup. Surgeons should keep this in mind when performing screw insertions in THR. However, care is necessary when translating these results to the intraoperative situation due to the experiments being conducted under laboratory conditions, and hence, future studies should attempt to replicate the results reported here in vivo.

Ten-year follow-up of the non-porous Allofit cementless acetabular component

Cementless acetabular fixation has demonstrated superior long-term durability in total hip replacement, but most series have studied implants with porous metal surfaces. We retrospectively evaluated the results of 100 consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement where a non-porous Allofit component was used for primary press-fit fixation.

This implant is titanium alloy, grit-blasted, with a macrostructure of forged teeth and has a biradial shape. A total of 81 patients (82 hips) were evaluated at final follow-up at a mean of 10.1 years (8.9 to 11.9). The Harris Hip Score improved from a mean 53 points (23 to 73) pre-operatively to a mean of 96 points (78 to 100) at final review. The osseointegration of all acetabular components was radiologically evaluated with no evidence of loosening. The survival rate with revision of the component as the endpoint was 97.5% (95% confidence interval 94 to 100) after 11.9 years. Radiolucency was found in one DeLee-Charnley zone in four acetabular components. None of the implants required revision for aseptic loosening. Two patients were treated for infection, one requiring a two-stage revision of the implant. One femoral stem was revised for osteolysis due to the production of metal wear debris, but the acetabular shell did not require revision.

This study demonstrates that a non-porous titanium acetabular component with adjunct surface fixation offers an alternative to standard porous-coated implants.

Primary stability in reversed-anatomy glenoid components

Reversed-anatomy shoulder replacement is advocated for patients with poor rotator cuff condition, for whom an anatomical reconstruction would provide little or no stability. Modern generations of this concept appear to be performing well in the short-term to midterm clinical follow-up. These designs are almost always non-cemented, requiring a high degree of primary stability to encourage bone on-growth and so to establish long-term fixation. Six different inverse-anatomy glenoid implants, currently on the market and encompassing a broad range of geometrical differences, were compared on the basis of their ability to impart primary stability through the minimization of interface micromotions. Fixing screws were only included in the supero-inferior direction in appropriate implants and were always inclined at the steepest available angle possible during surgery (up to a maximum of 30°). The extent of predicted bony on-growth was, of course, highly dependent on the threshold for interface micromotion. In some instances an additional 30 per cent of the interface was predicted to promote bone on-growth when the threshold was raised from 20 μm to 50 μm. With maximum thresholds of micromotion for bone on-growth set to 30 μm, the Zimmer Anatomical device was found to be the most stable of the series of the six designs tested herein, achieving an additional 3 per cent (by surface area) of bone on-growth above the closest peer product (Biomet Verso). When this threshold was raised to 50 μm, the Biomet Verso design was most stable (3 per cent above the second-most stable design, the Zimmer Anatomical). Peak micromotions were not a good indicator of the predicted area of bone on-growth and could lead to some misinterpretation of the implant's overall performance. All but one of the implants tested herein provided primary stability sufficient to resist motions in excess of 150 μm at the interface.

Midterm survivorship of a press-fit, plasma-sprayed, tri-spike acetabular component

Press-fit acetabular cups without screw holes can limit migration of particulate wear debris and reduce risk of acetabular osteolysis and device loosening. The Tri-Spike cup (Biomet, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) includes a titanium alloy plasma spray porous surface and does not require screw fixation. We retrospectively examined the incidence of cup loosening and acetabular osteolysis after implantation of 45 cups (44 patients) with mean follow-up of 7.3 years (range, 4-9 years). Only one patient (one cup) had evidence of less than 1 mm of retroacetabular radiolucency at 3 years (nonprogressive), which was found to remain firmly fixed during revision of the aseptically loosened femoral component. No cups were removed or revised at latest follow-up. Projected Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 9 years was 100% for cup loosening/revision and 97.8% for radiolucency.

The initial stability and contact mechanics of a press-fit resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

Finite element analysis was used to examine the initial stability after hip resurfacing and the effect of the procedure on the contact mechanics at the articulating surfaces. Models were created with the components positioned anatomically and loaded physiologically through major muscle forces. Total micromovement of less than 10 μm was predicted for the press-fit acetabular components models, much below the 50 μm limit required to encourage osseointegration. Relatively high compressive acetabular and contact stresses were observed in these models. The press-fit procedure showed a moderate influence on the contact mechanics at the bearing surfaces, but produced marked deformation of the acetabular components. No edge contact was predicted for the acetabular components studied.

It is concluded that the frictional compressive stresses generated by the 1 mm to 2 mm interference-fit acetabular components, together with the minimal micromovement, would provide adequate stability for the implant, at least in the immediate post-operative situation.

The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient affect acetabular cup stability

One of the major causes of loosening of cementless acetabular cup implants is insufficient initial stability. This study used three-dimensional finite element models of the pelvis and acetabular components to investigate the effects of the number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient of the acetabular cup on the initial stability under normal walking. A commercially available hemispherical acetabular cup with five screw holes was used as the default model. The stiffness of the pelvis and the friction coefficient of the cup were systematically varied, within a realistic range, to assess the initial stability of the acetabular cup. The simulations showed that the inserted screws provide only a localized reduction in the relative micromotion between the cup and pelvis therefore inserting several screw closed together might not be useful. Changes in the pelvic stiffness have a non-linear effect on the initial stability of acetabular cup and the subchondral bone provides good support for fixation of the cementless cup. The friction coefficient of the acetabular cup plays a limited role, comparing with the factor of bone quality, in resisting relative micromotion in the cup-pelvis interface.

The relation between micromotion and screw fixation in acetabular cup

One of the major causes inducing loosening in the cementless acetabular cup implanting is its insufficient initial stability. In this study, three-dimensional finite element models of the pelvis and acetabular components were developed to investigate the relationship between relative micromotion, initial stability, and screw fixation under six daily activity loadings. A commercial available hemispheric cup with five screw holes was used as the target acetabular cup. The simulation results showed that if screws were placed closed together, when the screw number increased from 1 to 5, the peak micromotion decreased less than 14%, from 126.5 to 108.8 microm, while the stable region, micromotion less than 28 microm, enlarged only by 40%, from 46.1% to 64.7%. However, if the screw could be placed near the cup rim, a single rim screw, 202.1 microm micromotion, could provide better stability than that of four dome screws, 209.6 microm micromotion, placed closed together. To conclude, multiple cup screws should be placed near cup rim and as separate as possible to enlarge the stable region and reduce the peak micromotion between cup and acetabulum.

Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup

One of the major failure modes of cementless acetabular components is the loosening of the acetabular cup, which is mostly attributable to insufficient initial stability. A hemispherical cup with a porous coating which is inserted with press-fit fixation and secured with several screws is one of the most widely used approaches. Many studies have found that bone screws are very helpful aids for cup fixation, but the optimal surgical technique for inserting screws has not been clearly reported. In this study, hemispherical cups were fixed into blocks of foam bone with zero to three screws. The effects of three types of screw eccentricity (a 1-mm offset and angular eccentricities of 15 degrees and 25 degrees ) on the initial stability of the acetabular cup were evaluated. The experimental results indicate that increasing the number of screws enhances the cup stability in the case of ideal screwing (i.e., with no eccentricity). An angular eccentricity of 15 degrees did not affect the cup stability for fixation with one or two screws. However, the presence of 25 degrees of angular eccentricity significantly reduced the stability of the cup, while 1 mm of offset eccentricity produced an even greater impact.

Press fit fixation of cementless cups: how much stability do we need indeed?

INTRODUCTION

Using screws for a better primary and secondary fixation has been discussed in the literature of the recent years, although the principle of press fit has been explained as the principle of a push-button. The authors wanted to compare their own results in patients using X-rays from the postoperative course to decide if it is really safer to use screws or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and twenty one consecutive, not selected patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty using a cementless cup type Duraloc. They were followed up over a time of 5 years for radiological changes of the bony acetabulum around the cup ("acetabular zones" according to De Lee and Charnley). One hundred and ten cups were additionally fixed with one to three screws at the upper part in region C1, 101 cups were implanted without the use of screws.

RESULTS

Periprosthetic changes visible on the radiographs (immediate postoperative gaps, subsequent sclerosis and radiolucent lines) were assessed according to the time of their appearance. A gap in zone C2 was seen more often immediately after operation within the group without screws (17.8% vs. 7.3%) and disappeared within the following 25 months. Within the group with screws significantly more often a gap was found in zone C1 and C3 compared to the group without screws (7.3% vs. 1.9%). In the group with screws a sclerosis of the bone in zone C1 developed in 32.7% mostly within the first 5 months. It was followed by a radiolucent line in zone C3 in 28.2% mainly within 5-25 months postoperatively and in zone C1 in 20.9% within 16 months. Significantly less seldom were these phenomena seen at the cups without screw fixation. There was no correlation between lateral or medial positioning and deviations from the ideal inclination to the bony changes around the cups. No signs of loosening occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Less radiological changes around the cup if no screws were used and no disadvantages within this group led to the conclusion that an additional screw fixation in principle is not necessary in press-fit cups.

Late loosening of press-fit cementless acetabular components

Between January 1987 and September 1990, 67 consecutive cementless total hip arthroplasties were implanted in 59 patients by one surgeon. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 57 years (range, 23-80 years). All acetabular components were plasma-sprayed titanium hemispheric cups with four peripheral rim fins, but additional screw fixation was not used. The mean followup was 10.4 years (range, 8.8-12.5 years). With revision as the endpoint, the failure rate of this acetabular component at a mean of 10.4 years was 28% (19/67). Of the 56 patients (56 hips) with radiographic followup, loosening of the acetabular shell occurred in 10 hips in 10 patients (18%). Seventy percent of these loosened cups failed by tilt which occurred in a rapid manner; all of the patients required revision surgery. We examined the manner of loosening of a press-fit acetabular component after early (5-year) results showed high hip scores and a low failure rate.

Failures and successes in total hip replacement--why good ideas may not work

The course of development of total hip replacement (THR) is neither harmonious nor linear. Progress and set-backs alternate. Progress in THR manifests itself through reductions in the number and the severity of complications (infection, aseptic loosening, prematurely worn components, etc.). Innovation is the motor of progress. However, today's innovation may well be tomorrow's revision! Progress has been achieved in part through new implant materials and designs that provide improvements in such things as stress distribution in surrounding bone, tissue compatibility and osseointegration, and resistance to both wear and cyclic fatigue. Of at least equal importance, however, are improvements achieved in operative procedures (e.g., cementing technique) and finally, in clinical quality control: more complete documentation of implant and patient variables, establishment of implant registers, and utilization of outcome studies to guide the course of further development. Causes of failure in THR are numerous. However, unexpected side effects of innovations are the most frequent cause. An innovation may solve one problem, but also creates new ones. Problems in innovation which can lead to failures include: over-generalization of expected patient responses, ignoring past experience or assigning wrong causes to encountered problems, and finally, ignoring the dynamic nature of the living system (which can be described as using "necro-" instead of biomechanical thinking). Quality control in both manufacturing and clinical practice has to be improved. The pioneer times have come to an end. Today's patients should have the right to be operated on by a well trained surgeon and to be provided with well tested, well-understood implant materials and devices. Progress in endoprosthetics has led to the present high level of clinical success. Paradoxically, however, success is the greatest obstacle to further progress. This is because the curve of progress as a result of effort expended has turned asymptotic in endoprosthetics, as it does in many endeavors. In such situations the more a product (e.g., surgical implant and procedure, automobile design, computer program) becomes successful, the more efforts (and finances) are needed for further progress. On the other hand, the "scissors"--created by crossing what might be feasible with what resources are available--open widely and can cut sharply. In fact, financial restrictions may force orthopaedic surgeons and the medical device and technology industry to turn to lower technologies in the future. However, whatever new developments in endoprosthetics may bring (be they sophistications or simplifications), we must remain open-minded and not assume things to be facts until there is evidence to support them.

A comparison of cementless acetabular components of the same design: spiked versus supplemental screws

The purpose of this report was to compare the results of a series of otherwise-identical, cementless acetabular components with screws to a group with spikes in primary total hip arthroplasty. Between April 1993 and August 1997, 339 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed using a cementless acetabular component in 312 patients. There were 227 acetabular components with screws and 112 with spikes only. Radiographic evaluation was performed at a mean of 4.8 years' postarthroplasty (range, 2-8.6 years). No significant difference was identified between the 2 groups in regard to radiographic or clinical parameters.