Simple debridement has little useful value on the clinical course of recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain

Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of traumatic central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex

Aims

The study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement and partial excision in patients with traumatic central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and to identify prognostic factors associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients arthroscopically diagnosed with Palmer 1 A lesions who underwent arthroscopic debridement and partial excision from March 2009 to February 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Mayo Wrist Score (MWS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. The poor outcome group was defined as patients whose preoperative and last follow-up clinical score difference was less than the minimal clinically important difference of the DASH score (10.83). Baseline characteristics, arthroscopic findings, and radiological factors (ulnar variance, MRI, or arthrography) were evaluated to predict poor clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 114 patients were enrolled in this study, with a mean follow-up period of 29.8 months (SD 14.4). The mean DASH score improved from 36.5 (SD 21.5) to 16.7 (SD 14.3), the mean MWS from 59.7 (SD 17.9) to 79.3 (SD 14.3), and the mean VAS pain score improved from 5.9 (SD 1.8) to 2.2 (SD 2.0) at the last follow-up (all p < 0.001). Among the 114 patients, 16 (14%) experienced poor clinical outcomes and ten (8.8%) required secondary ulnar shortening osteotomy. Positive ulnar variance was the only factor significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes (p < 0.001). Positive ulnar variance was present in 38 patients (33%); among them, eight patients (21%) required additional operations.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic debridement alone appears to be an effective and safe initial treatment for patients with traumatic central TFCC tears. The presence of positive ulnar variance was associated with poor clinical outcomes, but close observation after arthroscopic debridement is more likely to be recommended than ulnar shortening osteotomy as a primary treatment.

An All-arthroscopic Technique of Repair of Substance Tears of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex in Symptomatic Patients

Substance tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) can occur secondary to trauma of the wrist. On the dorsal periphery, they are considered Palmer 1B tears or Atzei class 1 tears. If along the radial side, they can manifest as a tear of the central disc, classified as a Palmar class 1A tear. If it involves the ligaments, it is stated as a pre-1D tear as per the new classification system by Luchetti and colleagues. Multiple excellent repair techniques exist in the current literature for dorsal peripheral tears and even for those in the substance of the TFCC, whereas there are successful evolving techniques of repair of avulsed tears and those involving the substance of the ligaments on the radial side adjacent to the sigmoid notch. Here, we describe our technique of repairing substance tears of the TFCC arthroscopically without the need for any specialized equipment apart from the basic arthroscopy set. The technique was conducted in a patient with a transverse substance tear on the radial side of the triangular fibrocartilage involving the central disc with complete resolution of symptoms. It is a simple technique, which can be used to repair class 1B peripheral tears and pre-1D tears in the substance of the TFCC.

Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (MUSO) is safer for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) than diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DUSO), DUSO is widely used for UIS treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment and determine the factors that should be considered when choosing surgical treatment for UIS.

METHODS

Articles comparing the effectiveness of DUSO and MUSO for UIS treatment were systematically retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The demography, incidence of complications, secondary operation rate, postoperative DASH score, wrist pain on the visual analogue scale, and grip strength improvement were also evaluated. In addition, the correlation between the improvement of grip strength and the shortening of osteotomy length of ulna was analyzed. The outcome of the patient was discontinuous, and the odds ratio, risk ratio (RR), and 95%CI were calculated and analyzed via RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six studies, including 83 patients receiving MUSO (experimental group) and 112 patients receiving DUSO (control group), were included in the meta-analysis. The second operation rate was significantly higher after DUSO than after MUSO. The DASH scores were slightly lower in the MUSO group than in the DUSO group. The patients receiving MUSO had slightly better pain relief effect than patients receiving DUSO. However, the incidence of complications and improvement of grip strength were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although DUSO and MUSO provide similar effects for UIS, MUSO is associated with a lower secondary operation rate, slightly lower postoperative DASH scores and slightly better pain relief effect than DUSO, indicating that MUSO can effectively be used for UIS treatment.

Do triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal injuries affect the clinical outcome of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome?

BACKGROUND

Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO), as its name implies, is used to shorten the ulna. It subsequently tightens the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and ulnar wrist. TFCC foveal insertion is a primary stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint. It is unclear whether USO is effective in TFCC foveal injuries. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomies with and without TFCC foveal injuries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with ulnar wrist pain treated with USO and wrist arthroscopy including the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Sixty-five patients were included in this study. An algorithm was used to guide surgical decision-making. After arthroscopic confirmation of ulnar impaction syndrome, we performed USO with a locking compression plate (mean length of shortening, 2.7 mm; range, 1-7.5 mm). The flattened TFCC disc due to ulnar shortening was confirmed arthroscopically. If the DRUJ was unstable after USO, we repaired the TFCC foveal insertion.

RESULTS

There were 32 post-traumatic and 33 idiopathic cases. We detected TFCC disc injuries in 34 wrists and TFCC foveal injuries in 33 wrists; both types were found in 15 wrists. TFCC foveal injuries were not significantly correlated with patient age, history of trauma, or clinical outcome. Most patients showed good clinical outcomes; 31 of 65 patients had preoperative DRUJ instability, with a significant number having foveal but not disc injuries.

CONCLUSION

USO achieved reasonable outcomes, even in patients with TFCC foveal injuries. In cases demonstrating ulnar impaction, USO should be prioritized over TFCC repair.

Predictors of Secondary Ulnar Shortening and Reoperation After Arthroscopic TFCC Debridement

BACKGROUND

Predicting which patients will do well with arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) debridement alone or which patients may benefit from arthroscopic debridement and ulnar shortening at the same time can be challenging. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the rate and type of complications and reoperations after arthroscopic TFCC debridement. Furthermore, we aimed to identify factors associated with reoperation and specifically ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) after this procedure.

METHODS

We included 163 patients who underwent arthroscopic TFCC debridement as a first surgery for treatment of their ulnar-sided wrist pain. Patient charts were manually reviewed, and ulnar variance was measured on preoperative posteroanterior radiographs of the wrist. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with reoperation. Additional subgroup analyses looking at USO after TFCC debridement were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression survival analysis.

RESULTS

We found a complication rate of 14% and a reoperation rate of 19% (most common USO with 10%). Chondromalacia was independently associated with reoperation. Forty percent of patients with a positive ulnar variance later proceeded to USO. A hazard ratio of 1.8 per millimeter of ulnar variance was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that patients with a positive ulnar variance with frank chondral loss at the time of arthroscopic TFCC debridement may benefit from simultaneous USO.

The Combined Procedure of Ulnar Metaphyseal Shortening Osteotomy With Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Knotless Repair

Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear are common causes of ulnar-sided wrist pain. As a standard surgical treatment, ulnar-shortening osteotomy (USO) and TFCC repair are used respectively. Patient spectrums of UIS accompanied by distal radioulnar joint instability or traumatic TFCC foveal tear with UIS symptoms exist, and both USO and TFCC repair are necessary for treating some of these patients. However, there have been few reports on the procedure for performing these 2 operations concurrently. We introduce a combined procedure to concurrently perform USO and TFCC repair. We performed a USO in the ulnar metaphysis using a locking plate and open TFCC knotless repair using a suture anchor at the ulnar fovea. In this technique, USO is conducted in the metaphysis, which is favorable to union, using a small plate that is easy to handle, and knotless TFCC repair can be performed simultaneously through a single small incision.

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy: Our Experience

Objective  The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of our series regarding ulnar shortening osteotomy, as well as to briefly review the pathology, indications and surgical options of ulnocarpal conflict. Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who were treated with ulnar shortening osteotomy between January 2012 and June 2017 at our hospital. We clinically evaluated pain, articular range of motion, grip strength and functional outcomes using the quick-DASH questionnaire. We radiographically measured the pre- and postoperative ulnar variance and the shortening performed. Results  We identified eight operated patients, and it was possible to evaluate seven of them. Pain decreased in this population (visual analogue scale [VAS] score changed from 7 to 2.6, p  < 0.05), there was a decrease in quick-DASH (64 to 28, p  < 0.05) and we found a decrease in the articular amplitude ∼ 7° for flexion ( p  = 0.2), and of 5.5° for supination ( p  = 0.3), as well as decreasing grip strength to about 86% on the contralateral side ( p  = 0.07). The ulnar variance changed from a mean of + 5.5 mm to - 1.1 mm ( p  < 0.05). Two out of 8 patients (25%) presented plaque-related symptoms and one of them underwent a new intervention to extract the material. Conclusions  Ulnar shortening osteotomy is an effective surgical procedure both in the treatment of ulnocarpal conflict and in the discharge of the ulna. The results presented agreement with other results published in the literature, with good clinical and radiographic results.

Outcome of conservative treatment for triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions with stable distal radioulnar joint

Purpose

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions have high clinical relevance. Although multiple studies have been done in the past, there is a lack of data after conservative treatment and controversy remains regarding management. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of symptomatic TFCC lesions after conservative treatment and arthroscopic debridement.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2017, 33 patients were included. 16 patients were treated conservatively and 17 patients with arthroscopic debridement. The average age was 41 years (range 18–63). The mean follow-up was 22.2 months (range 6–74). Evaluation included pain, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), and Purdue Pegboard test.

Results

Pain averaged 0.1 (range 0–1) in the conservative group compared to 1.3 (range 0–6) in the arthroscopic group. The mean ROM was 99% for wrist extension, and 100% for flexion and pro-/supination in the conservative group, and 96% for extension and flexion, and 100% for pro-/supination in the arthoscopic group compared to the contralateral side. Grip strength was 88% (range 63–100) in the conservative group versus 89% (range 33–100) in the arthroscopic group. The conservative group reached a DASH score of 16.8 and MMWS of 94.3 compared to 22.1 and 87.2 in the arthroscopic group. The differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated similar results of conservative compared to arthroscopic treatment. Because conservative treatment was a sufficient and reliable option, we propose it as first-line treatment for TFCC lesions with stable distal radioulnar joint.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement

Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.

Perceptions and experiences of wrist surgeons on the management of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: a qualitative study

There is lack of consensus on the management of triangular fibrocartilage injuries. The aim of this study was to investigate wrist surgeons' experiences and perceptions regarding treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries and to explore the rationale behind clinical decision-making. A purposive sample of consultant wrist surgeons (n = 10) was recruited through 'snow-balling' until data saturation was reached. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two researchers independently analysed data using an iterative/thematic approach. Findings suggest that surgeons rely more on their own training and experience, and patient-related factors such as individual expectations, to inform their decision-making, rather than on published material. Current classification systems are largely considered to be unhelpful. Level of evidence: V.

Prognostic Factors of Arthroscopic Debridement for Central Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears in Adults Younger Than 45 Years: A Retrospective Case Series Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze factors that affect the treatment outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for central triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions in adults <45 years of age.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients (mean age, 39 years; range, 20-44 years) who had been arthroscopically diagnosed with central TFCC tears were treated with arthroscopic debridement. Demographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings were examined and analyzed. The response to treatment, including pain numeric rating scale on an ulnar provocation test; Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and satisfaction with treatment, was assessed at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean pain numeric rating scale (6.6 ± 3.6 to 2.4 ± 2.0, P < .01) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (59.3 ± 15.0 to 33.7 ± 14.1, P < .01) scores exhibited significant clinical improvement at 12-month follow-up. In terms of satisfaction, 43 patients (70.5%) were satisfied (enthusiastic or satisfied) and 18 (29.5%) were dissatisfied (noncommittal or disappointed). In the satisfied group, there were 24 flap and 19 wearing tears, whereas in the dissatisfied group, there were 4 flap and 14 wearing tears (P = .02). The extent of ulnar plus variance on preoperative radiographs also differed between the 2 groups (0.5 ± 1.2 vs 1.7 ± 1.1, P < .01). There were no significant differences in age, gender, hand dominance, or work level between the groups. After controlling for confounding variables, the wearing type tears (odds ratio, 3.4) and greater ulnar plus variance (odds ratio, 2.0) were associated with a higher likelihood of dissatisfaction after arthroscopic TFCC debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical outcome scores showed significant improvement after arthroscopic debridement for central TFCC tears, wearing type tears and greater ulnar plus variance were associated with dissatisfaction and poorer postoperative outcomes after the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement May or May Not Help With Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain

After ruling out additional potential pain generators for ulnar-sided wrist pain, arthroscopic debridement for triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology can be an effective means for decreasing pain and improving function in the short term. Arthroscopic skills aside, this procedure will not work for all comers, and establishing realistic patient expectations is essential for optimal outcomes.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of radiographic central triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals younger than 50 years

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed the prevalence of central triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears or their risk factors for symptom development. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of radiographic central TFCC tears in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, and evaluate clinical characteristics of symptomatic individuals.

METHODS

In this retrospective case control study, 221 patients younger than 50 years who exhibited positive ulnocarpal provocation test and underwent MRI to identify abnormalities associated with TFCC were age- and sex-matched with 221 controls who had undergone hand or wrist MRI for tumorous lesions or pain in hand other than ulnar-sided wrist. Demographic and radiologic parameters including the degree of ulnar plus variance, the type of central TFCC lesions, the presence of ulna head or carpal bone enhancement, and cartilage degeneration of ulno-carpal or distal radio-ulnar joint were compared. Multivariable regression analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for symptom development in patients with central TFCC lesions.

RESULTS

The prevalence of central TFCC lesions was 68/221 in symptomatic patients, which was not significantly different from that (51/221) in asymptomatic controls. Patients in the symptomatic group had significantly greater ulnar plus variance (1.6 vs. 0.7). They were more likely to have type 1A tears and bony enhancement in ulnar head or carpus on MR images. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that youth, female gender, and presence of bony enhancement were significant risk factors for symptom development in central TFCC lesions.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, prevalence of central TFCC lesions detected on MRI in symptomatic patients seems to be similar to that in asymptomatic individuals. Younger age, female gender, and presence of bony enhancement on MR images seem to be risk factors for symptoms of central TFCC lesions.

Variation in Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex

Background  There is controversy regarding the value of repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Given that an acute tear of the TFCC associated with a displaced distal radius fracture uncommonly benefits from repair, the role of repair in other settings is uncertain. Our impression is that TFCC repair is highly variable from surgeon-to-surgeon. Purpose  The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of TFCC repair in patients who had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the wrist obtained for ulnar-sided wrist pain, and that showed signal changes in the TFCC. We tested the primary null hypothesis that there are no demographic or surgeon factors associated with repair of the TFCC. Patients and Methods  Three hundred and ninety-four patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain and an MRI scan showing changes in the TFCC were included in this retrospective study. No patients had instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) recorded in the medical record. Surgical repair of TFCC tears was used as the primary outcome during statistical analysis to identify factors associated with repair. Results  Out of 394 (6%), 25 patients underwent TFCC repair. We found that 10% of the treating surgeons (4 out of 41) performed 80% of the procedures (20 out of 25). Patients who discerned a trauma prior to their symptoms and patients whose MRI showed signal changes primarily in the ulnar portion of the TFCC were more likely to have surgical repair. Conclusion We found that the rate of TFCC repair varies substantially from surgeon-to-surgeon. The observation that repair is more likely to happen when patients perceive themselves as injured suggests that perception of injury affects how patients and surgeons consider treatment options. To help avoid surgeries based on surgeon bias or patient misperception, we suggest studying the effect of tools that provide simple, balanced, dispassionate, and empowering information (e.g., decision aids) that can limit surgeon-to-surgeon variation. Level of Evidence  Level IV.

Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome with and without Central TFC Lesion

Background  Arthroscopic debridement of the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) is well accepted in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome with central TFC lesions. Treatment remains controversial, however, when there is no such lesion from radiocarpal view. Purpose  This study assessed the clinical outcome of arthroscopic central TFC resection and debridement and secondary ulnar shortening in patients with ulnar impaction with central TFC lesion compared with patients without TFC lesion. Patients and Methods  Thirty-two consecutive patients with ulnar impaction syndrome were arthroscopically treated, 16 of whom had a central lesion of the TFC that was debrided. In the 16 patients with no lesion from the radiocarpal view, the TFC was centrally resected and debrided to decompress the ulnocarpal joint. Persisting symptoms necessitated ulnar shortening in four patients in each group. Two patients underwent repeat arthroscopic TFC debridement. All patients were examined at 3, 6, and 12 months, and at final follow-up (mean: 1.7 years) following arthroscopy, respectively ulnar shortening or hardware removal. Results  In both groups, pain, Krimmer, and DASH scores significantly improved. Improvements of DASH scores were significantly higher in patients without lesion at 12 months and at final follow-up. For other parameters, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion  In both situations, with and without central TFC lesion, resection and debridement sufficiently reduced the ulnar-sided wrist pain and improved function in three out of four patients, and therefore qualified as the first-line treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome as arthroscopy is performed, anyway. Those patients who complained of persisting or recurrent ulnar-sided wrist pain finally benefitted from ulnar shortening osteotomy as the secondary procedure. Level of Evidence  Therapeutic III, case-control study.

Outcomes after Arthroscopic Debridement of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex in Adolescents

Background  To the best of our knowledge, we are not aware of any reports focusing on results of arthroscopic debridement of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears in immature patients. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate our results after arthroscopic debridement of TFCC tears in adolescents. Materials and Methods  We retrospectively identified all patients of 18 years or less, who received an arthroscopic TFCC debridement due to a traumatic or degenerative tear according to Palmer. These cases were clinically re-evaluated after a mean period of 6.7 years (SD ± 3.9 years). All patients completed the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) inventory, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Results  Thirteen adolescent patients (mean age: 15.6 ± 2.2 years at surgery) were included. The mean MMWS increased significantly from 70 ± 13.6 to 90 ± 6.5 after the TFCC debridement; mean postoperative DASH and PRWE scores of 17 ± 15.2 and 21 ± 18.5, respectively, indicated good and excellent outcomes for the majority of the cohort. The mean pain level decreased significantly from a mean of 5.7 ± 2.0 to 1.8 ± 2.0 at follow-up. Six patients needed a reoperation to achieve a successful outcome. Conclusion  Arthroscopic debridement of TFCC tears, performed as a concomitant wrist surgery in adolescents, efficiently reduced wrist pain and yielded good to excellent results in the long term. However, under certain circumstances, its results are unpredictable and further surgery may be necessary to eventually achieve the satisfying outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Level of Evidence  Level IV, therapeutic case series.

A Systematic Review of Outcomes after Arthroscopic Débridement for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the effectiveness of arthroscopic débridement for a triangular fibrocartilage complex tear is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of débridement for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

METHODS

The authors searched all available literature in the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases for articles reporting on triangular fibrocartilage complex tear débridement. Data collection included arc of motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1723 unique studies were identified, of which 18 studies met the authors' criteria. The mean before and after arc of wrist extension/flexion motion values were 120 and 146 degrees (six studies). The mean before and after grip strength values were 65 percent and 91 percent of the contralateral side (10 studies). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (six studies) and pain visual analogue scale scores (seven studies) improved from 39 to 18, and from 7 to 3, respectively. The mean pain visual analogue scale score after débridement was 1.9 in the ulnar-positive group and 2.4 in the ulnar-neutral and ulnar-negative groups. Eighty-seven percent of patients returned to their original work.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported reduced pain and improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after débridement of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. Most patients after débridement returned to previous work, with few complications. Although some of these cases may require secondary procedures, simple débridement can be performed with suitable satisfactory outcomes for cases with any type of ulnar variance.

Effects of depression and inflammatory factors on chronic conditions of the wrist

Aims

Chronic conditions of the wrist may be difficult to manage because pain and psychiatric conditions are correlated with abnormal function of the hand. Additionally, intra-articular inflammatory cytokines may cause pain. We aimed to validate the measurement of inflammatory cytokines in these conditions and identify features associated with symptoms.

Patients and Methods

The study included 38 patients (18 men, 20 women, mean age 43 years) with a chronic condition of the wrist who underwent arthroscopy. Before surgery, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Hand20 questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain were used. Cytokine and chemokine levels in the synovial fluid of the wrist were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and correlations between the levels with pain were analysed. Gene expression profiles of the synovial membranes were assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Older patients had high pre-operative Hand20 scores. One-year post-operative Hand20 and VAS scores and pre-operative VAS scores correlated with SDS scores. Post-operative VAS scores negatively correlated with the expression of nerve growth factor and SDS scores positively correlated with the expression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and negatively correlated with the expression of tumour necrosis factor-converting enzyme.

Conclusion

There was a positive correlation between depression and chronic conditions of the wrist. Levels of some cytokines correlate with pain and depression. Additionally, cytokines may be important in the assessment and treatment of chronic conditions of the wrist and depression. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:961–8.

Ulnar impaction syndrome: incidence of lunotriquetral ligament degeneration and outcome of ulnar-shortening osteotomy

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that most patients with ulnar impaction syndrome have degenerative changes of the proximal lunotriquetral (LT) membrane and that ulnar-shortening osteotomy is an effective procedure in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 50 wrists of 49 patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome who underwent an arthroscopic evaluation at the time of ulnar-shortening osteotomy, and subsequently at plate removal. Based on the Geissler classification, patients were divided into group A, normal, and group B, grades I to IV. The degree of degeneration of the proximal LT membrane at first-look arthroscopy was compared with that at second-look arthroscopy.

RESULTS

After ulnar-shortening osteotomy, both groups improved significantly in wrist range of motion and grip strength. According to the Mayo wrist score, 29, 18, and 3 patients showed excellent, good, and fair results, respectively. Of the 50 wrists, 25 had degenerative changes (group B) in the proximal LT membrane at the time of first-look arthroscopy. Of the 25 wrists in group B, 11 wrists improved based on the Geissler grade, 9 wrists showed no changes, and 2 wrists became worse. Clinically, patients demonstrated improvement after ulnar-shortening osteotomy regardless of the degree of degenerative LT ligament changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Degenerative LT membrane changes that were seen in about half of our patients were mostly of a mild nature, and the clinical outcomes of ulnar-shortening osteotomy were acceptable.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar-sided wrist pain

Background The purpose of ulnar shortening osteotomy is literally to shorten the ulna. It can tighten the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), ulnocarpal ligaments, and interosseous membrane. Nowadays, this method is used to treat ulnar-sided wrist pain, for which we have also started to use a treatment algorithm. The purpose of this study was to review the long-term and clinical results based on our algorithm. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome after a minimum follow-up of 5 years (Group A) and then retrospectively evaluated 66 patients with recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain treated based on our algorithm (Group B). Description of Technique Ulnocarpal abutment was confirmed arthroscopically. The distal ulna was approached through a longitudinal incision between the extensor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi ulnaris. We performed a transverse resection of the ulna fixed with a small locking compression plate. The contralateral side served as the reference for the length of shortening (mean, 2.4 mm; range, 1-5 mm). Disappearance of ulnar abutment was then confirmed again arthroscopically. Results (Group A) Most patients showed good long-term clinical results. About half of the patients showed a bony spur at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), but the clinical results did not significantly correlate with presence of bony spurs. Radiological parameters wre not related to the presence of bony spurs. (Group B) Twenty-four of the 66 patients investigated prospectively underwent an ulnar shortening osteotomy, with all showing good clinical results at 18 months postoperatively. Conclusions Ulnar shortening osteotomy can change the load of the ulnar side of the wrist and appears useful for ulnar-sided wrist pain in the presence of ulnar impaction. Level of evidence IV.