Femoral neck fractures: a changing paradigm

Comparison of femoral neck system fixation outcomes in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: a multicenter retrospective study of patients aged below and above 75 years

PURPOSE

The use of fixation and arthroplasty in treating elderly patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) remains controversial. The femoral neck system (FNS) is known to have relatively stronger axial and rotational stability compared with cancellous screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate how effective internal fixation using a FNS is for non-displaced FNF in elderly patients.

METHODS

All patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and II) FNF between July 2019 and November 2023 were eligible for osteosynthesis surgery at three institutions. Ninety-five patients (50 under 75 years of age and 45 over 75 years of age) who were treated with FNS with a follow-up period of more than 1 year were included. Clinical data (age, sex, direction, body mass index, injury mechanism, bone mineral density (BMD), and time to operation) were extracted from patient records. Institutional imaging software was used for radiographic analysis to evaluate surgical site complications at 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for reoperation.

RESULTS

The mean age of the younger group was 61.0 years, whereas that of the elderly group was 81.2 years. No significant differences were observed between the two groups except for BMD and time to operation. Three reoperations were observed in the younger group (6%), and four cases were observed in the elderly group (8.9%) (p = 0.894), and no significant difference in other surgical complications was observed between the two groups. BMD was identified as an independent risk factor for reoperation.

CONCLUSION

FNS may be used as an alternative to elderly and younger patients with nondisplaced FNFs. However, the reoperation rate may increase in severe osteoporosis patients with very low hip BMD.

Proximal femur geometry: a major predictor of proximal femur fracture subtypes

INTRODUCTION

Proximal femur geometry (PFG) represents an important risk factor for the occurrence of hip fractures. There are currently few studies regarding the correlation between PFG and the occurrence of a specific fracture subtype, and those that exist have small cohorts and present with different methodologies and contradictory results. Therefore, there is no consensus in the literature regarding this topic. The present study aimed to establish the contribution of the PFG in the occurrence of different subtypes of proximal femur fractures (PFF): intertrochanteric, neck and subtrochanteric.

METHODS

Analysis of 1022 plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients consecutively admitted to the emergency room of a Level 1 Trauma Centre between 2013 and 2019 after low energy trauma who presented with PFF and underwent surgical treatment. Patients were analysed considering age, gender and subtype of PFF (intertrochanteric, neck or subtrochanteric). Radiological parameters including cervicodiaphyseal angle (CDA), horizontal offset (HO), femoral neck width (FNW), femoral neck length (FNL), great trochanter-pubic symphysis distance (GTPSD), acetabular teardrop distance (ATD) and width of the intertrochanteric region (WIR) were measured and compared between the different subtypes of fractures (7154 measurements). Statistical analysis was conducted recurring to absolute measurements and measurements ratios. The correlation was assessed using t-test.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in proximal femur geometry between the different subtypes of fractures. Patients presenting with femoral neck fractures had greater CDA (132.5 ± 6.9 vs. 130.0 ± 7.3; p < 0.001) and lower HO (45.8 ± 7.4 vs. 49.0 ± 8.0; p < 0.001), HO/ATD (0.34 ± 0.068 vs. 0.37 ± 0.072; p < 0.001) and HO/GTPSD (0.26 ± 0.049 vs. 0.28 ± 0.039; p < 0.001) than patients with intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

PFG represents an important contributor to the occurrence of different fracture subtypes. Femoral neck fractures are associated with greater CDA and lower HO, HO/ATD and HO/GTPSD when compared to intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Short Axial Length of the Proximal Femur: A Caution in the Use of Femoral Neck System in Patients with Garden Type I/II Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

In 2018, Femoral Neck System (FNS), a dedicated fixator for femoral neck fractures, was introduced. This device has been in increasing use because it provides excellent rotational and angular stability. However, the shortest bolt of FNS is 75 mm long. Thus, it is not usable when the axial length of the proximal femur (ALPF), the distance between the innominate tubercle and the surface of the femoral head, is less than 80 mm. In this study, we investigated the incidence and associated factors of small ALPF (< 80 mm) in femoral neck fracture patients.

METHODS

We measured the ALPF on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of 261 patients (166 women and 55 men), who were operated due to nondisplaced or impacted femoral neck fractures. The ALPF was measured on reconstructed oblique coronal images along the femoral neck. We evaluated the distribution of ALPF, calculated the incidence of small ALPF (< 80 mm), and correlated it with patient's height, weight, body mass index, age, bone mineral density (T-score), and caput-column-diaphysis angle.

RESULTS

The ALPF ranged from 67.4 mm to 107.1 mm (mean, 88.4 mm; standard deviation, 7.2 mm). In 19 patients (8.6%, 19 / 221), the length was < 80 mm. The ALPF was strongly correlated with height (correlation coefficient = 0.707, R2 = 0.500, p < 0.001) and moderately correlated with weight (correlation coefficient = 0.551, R2 = 0.304, p < 0.001). The T-score was moderately correlated with the ALPF (correlation coefficient = 0.433, R2 = 0.187, p < 0.001). The age was moderately correlated with the ALPF (correlation coefficient =-0.353, R2 = 0.123, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable percentage of femoral neck fracture patients (8.6%) had small proximal femurs (ALPF < 80 mm), which cannot be operated with FNS. We recommend measuring the ALPF using reconstructed oblique coronal CT images or scaled hip radiographs: en face view of the femoral neck prior to surgery in patients with short stature and/or low body weight. If the ALPF is < 80 mm, the surgeon should prepare other fixation devices.

Correlation between shape-closed femoral stem design and bone cement implantation syndrome in osteoporotic elderly femoral neck fracture undergoing cemented hip arthroplasty: A retrospective case-control study in 128 patients

BACKGROUND

Bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) is a serious and potentially fatal complication especially in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fracture (OFNF) undergoing cemented hip arthroplasty (CHA). Recent studies showed that the shape-closed femoral stem profile could lead to a significant increase of the intramedullary pressure during cementation and prosthesis insertion. This study aimed to (1) correlate the use of shaped-closed femoral stem and other perioperative risk factors with severe grade of BCIS grade 2 or 3: BCIS gr2/3, and (2) identify the prevalence of BCIS in the elderly patients with OFNF and treated with CHA.

HYPOTHESIS

Large wedge-shaped (or "shape-closed") femoral stem design would significantly associate with BCIS gr2/3 in the elderly patients who sustained OFNF and underwent CHA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 128 OFNF patients, who aged over 75years and underwent CHA were retrospectively reviewed and then allocated into 2 groups: SC Group (use shape-closed femoral stem, n=40) and FC Group (use force-closed femoral stem, n=88). BCIS was grading in all patients according to Donaldson classification. Perioperative data between the patients with BCIS-gr2/3 and those with BCIS grade 0 or 1 (BCIS-gr0/1) were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors for BCIS-gr2/3.

RESULTS

The prevalence of overall BCIS and BCIS-gr2/3 was 32.8% (n=42) and 6.2% (n=8), respectively. The total in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 2.3% and 4.7%, respectively. The major perioperative complication in patients with BCIS-gr2/3 was significantly higher compared to those in patients with BCIS-gr0/1 (62.5% vs. 10.0%, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age>90years (OR=9.4, 95% CI: 1.4-62.9, p=0.02), preinjury Parker mobility score<4 (OR=48.8; 95% CI: 2.7-897.2, p=0.008) and shape-closed femoral stem used (OR=19.1; 95% CI: 1.8-204.5, p=0.01) were the significant independent predictors for BCIS-gr2/3 in these patients.

CONCLUSION

BCIS in OFNF patients undergoing CHA is common and associates with a high major perioperative complication rate. Our initial hypothesis is validated as the patients at risk for BCIS-gr2/3 are those whose CHA procedures use a shape-closed femoral stem design and with extreme age, and having poor preinjury ambulatory status. Therefore, we recommended using cementless stem as the first option in OFNF. However, if CHA is needed, strict guideline for cement insertion should be followed with force-closed stem application to avoid the risk of BCIS-gr2/3.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective case-control study.

A Comparative Analysis of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Six-Month Follow-Up

Objective

To investigate the efficacies of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and the three cannulated screws fixation (3CS) as therapeutic options for femoral neck fractures.

Method

This was a retrospective study involving 69 patients (26 males and 43 females; mean age of 54.9 years (range, 28–66 years)) subjected to either FNS or 3CS for femoral neck fracture therapy. These patients were treated in our hospital from October 2019 to May 2020. Patient follow up was done at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. During the short‐term (6 months) follow‐up period, surgical procedures for the two groups and incidences of complications were analyzed. Perioperative parameters were recorded and analyzed. Postoperative hip joint functions were measured and compared using the Harris score. The assessed perioperative parameters included surgical time, hemoglobin loss, fluoroscopy duration, hospitalization length and hospitalization cost. The main complications at last follow‐up (6 months) included varus tilting, femoral neck shortness, and implant removal.

Results

Differences in the number of patients, age, Garden type of fracture and time from injury to surgery between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). With regards to perioperative parameters, compared to 3CS, FNS treatment performed better in surgical time (60.00 ± 12.44 vs 76.81 ± 13.10 min, P = 0.000), blood loss (13.67 ± 8.02 vs 16.58 ± 4.16 g/L, P = 0.059) and fluoroscopy time (39.73 ± 9.57 vs 58.14 ± 9.15 s, P = 0.000). Differences in hospitalization length and cost between the groups were not significant (P > 0.05). During the whole follow‐up period, all patients did not exhibit dysfunction, pulmonary embolism or even death as a result of long‐term immobilization of affected limbs. Surgical incisions for all patients healed well without infections. During the 6‐month follow‐up period, the FNS group exhibited a higher Harris score (84.61 ± 3.42 vs 78.67 ± 3.72, p = 0.000). In addition, treatment‐associated complications (FNS vs 3CS) included femoral neck varus tilt (3.03% vs 11.11%), femoral neck shortness (6.06% vs 13.89%), and implant removal (0% vs. 13.89%). Implant removal rate for the FNS group was significantly less than that of the 3CS group (P = 0.026). Differences in incidences of femoral neck varus tilt (P = 0.196) and femoral neck shortness (P = 0.282) between the two groups were not significant. However, the difference in number was significant (FNS group was less).

Conclusion

FNS treatment is associated with a smaller surgical trauma, stronger stability, and reductions in post‐operative complication incidences, therefore, it is a potential therapeutic option for femoral neck fractures.

Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study

The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially threaded cannulated screws (PCS). Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016, there were 89 patients with the main diagnose of FNF who accepted the treatment of closed reduction cannulated screw fixation in Peking University People’s Hospital. 34 cases of PCS and 23 cases of HCS met the criterion. The characteristics, prognoses and the imaging changes of all cases were described and the differences between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Mann–Whitney U test, Analysis of Variance and Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance was defined as P value (two sided) less than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the general characteristics, fracture classifications and reduction quality between the two groups. HCS group had a significant lower angle decrease rate (30.4% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.035), femoral neck shortening rate (26.1% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.044) and screw back-sliding rate (21.7% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032), but a higher screw cut-out rate (21.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008). In non-displacement fracture subgroup, HCS had significant higher Harris Score (92 vs. 90, P = 0.048). Compared with PCS, HCS had a lower screw back-sliding rate, femoral shortening rate, angle decrease rate and similar function score, but would result in more screw cut-outs in displaced FNF. As a conclusion, HCS should not be used in displaced FNF due to its higher screw cut-out rate, and its potential advantage in non-displaced FNF needs to be further proved. Further qualified investigations with a larger scale of patients and longer follow-up are needed in the future.

How do Orthopedic Surgeons Manage Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in the Middle-Aged Patient? Brazilian Survey of 78 Orthopaedic Surgeons

Objective  The aim of the present study was to evaluate the practices and preferences of Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in middle-aged patients. Methods  A survey containing 10 images of femoral neck fractures was sent to a group of 100 orthopedic surgeons, all of them members of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology. The questionnaire asked the treatment option for cases of nondisplaced and displaced fractures of the femoral neck in middle-aged patients, that is, those between 50 and 69 years old. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyzes were performed using the chi-squared (χ2) and the Fisher exact tests. The level of significance was 5%. Results  The survey was answered by 78% of the orthopedic surgeons invited to participate in the study. There was no significant difference in the treatment method distribution between generalists and specialists ( p  = 0.16) in the sample of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. There was a highly significant difference in the treatment method distribution between generalists and specialists ( p  < 0.0001) in the sample of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Conclusion  Preservation of the femoral head through multiple cannulated screws fixation is the treatment of choice for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures for both generalists and specialists. Low chronological and/or physiological age are the main factors for this decision-making. In displaced femoral neck fractures, femoral head replacement is preferred for both groups of orthopedists (generalists and specialists). In this situation, specialists prefer total hip arthroplasty (THA), whereas generalists favor partial hip arthroplasty (PHA).

The relationship between femoral neck fracture in adult and avascular necrosis and nonunion: A retrospective study

Background

One of the most serious sequelae of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is avascular necrosis (AVN), and this complication translates to significant morbidity and mortality. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between the etiologies and management of FNFs at our institution and the development of AVN or nonunion.

Materials and methods

This study was a retrospective medical chart review of all adult patients admitted and managed for FNF.

Results

There were a total of 69 FNF patients reviewed. FNF was caused by a fall in 37 patients (53.6%), a road traffic accident in 16 (23.2%), motorcycle and motorbike accidents in 8 (11.6%), and heavy exercise in 8 (11.6%). Twenty-four patients (34.8%) had fixation within 24 h of injury, and 45 (65.2%) went more than 24 h before fixation. The mean RUSH score at 6 months was 21.4 ± 5.1. There were 4 patients (5.8%) with a collapsed FNF and 4 patients (5.8%) had a nonunion FNF. AVN was documented in 12 patients (17.4%). Of the 12 patients who had AVN, 8 (66.7%) received fixation within 24 h from the time of the injury, whereas only 4 (33.3%) received fixation more than 24 h after the injury. There was a significant negative correlation between the time of fixation and AVN.

Conclusion

We report a 17.4% incidence of AVN over 10 years in patients managed with FNF. AVN was found to be significantly correlated with the mode of injury (fall and RTA among younger male patients).

•

Avascular necrosis is a serious sequelae of femoral neck fracture.

•

It has been noted that time is essential in the management of FNFs.

•

We found that there is no association between late fixation of the FNF and the development of AVN.

Does fully-threaded Headless Compression Screw provide a length-stable fixation in undisplaced femoral neck fractures?

OBJECTIVE

Femoral neck shortening is a common complication after surgical treatment for intracapsular femoral neck fractures. This study investigated whether fully-threaded Headless Compression Screw (FTHCS) can be a more length-stable implant than partially-threaded cannulated screw (PTCS) in reducing femoral neck shortening.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures (17 treated by internal fixation with three FTHCS, and 33 treated by three PTCS) from 2011 to 2014 were enrolled in this study. The radiography of the hips and medical records were reviewed for proximal femur geometry and complications.

RESULTS

Significant shortening of the femoral neck length until union were noted in both group (FTHCS group: -2.5 mm, p = 0.045; PTCS group: -2.4 mm, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in the length of femoral neck shortening between groups (p = 0.855). Age was the only significant risk factor for >5 mm of femoral neck shortening (p = 0.041). The femoral neck-shaft angle tended to reduce and become more varus in both groups (FTHCS: -2.7°, SD = 4.5, p = 0.028; PTCS: -5.0°, SD = 8.3, p = 0.002), but the differences between groups were nonsignificant (p = 0.577). The complication rates were similar between FTHCS and PTCS (17.6% and 21.2%, p > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

The FTHCSs may be a substitute for PTCSs, but it cannot prevent femoral neck shortening and varus collapse after fracture fixation. Future studies should focus on how to preserve femoral neck length and hip function after femoral neck fractures.

Risk factors of avascular necrosis of the femoral head and fixation failure in patients with valgus angulated femoral neck fractures over the age of 50 years

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors for avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and fixation failure (FF) after screw osteosynthesis in patients with valgus angulated femoral neck fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 308 patients (mean age, 72.5 years, range, 50-97 years), with a mean follow-up of 21.4 months (range, 12-64 months). The risk for failure in treatment (FIT) associated with patient- and fracture-related factors was evaluated by logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

FIT was identified in 32 cases (10.3%): 22 cases (7.1%) of AVN and 10 cases (3.2%) of FF. Initial valgus tilt>15° (p=0.023), posterior tilt>15° (p=0.012), and screw sliding distance (p=0.037) were significantly associated with FIT. FIT occurred in 7 patients (5.2%) with B1.2.1 fractures and 17 patients (48.6%) with B1.1.2 fractures (p<0.001). The odds of FIT were 17-fold higher in patients with initial valgus and posterior tilts>15° (B1.1.2) compared to patients with <15° of tilt in both planes (B1.2.1).

CONCLUSION

The severity of initial deformity predicts AVN and FF in patients with valgus angulated femoral neck fractures. Patients with an initial valgus and posterior tilt>15° are reasonable candidates for primary arthroplasty due to high risk of FIT.

Total hip replacement for neck of femur fracture: Comparing outcomes with matched elective cohort

INTRODUCTION

Current literature suggests that total hip replacement (THR) is superior to hemiarthroplasty (HA) for neck of femur fracture in selected group of patients. The outcomes of THR undertaken for trauma setting remain unclear when comparing with elective THR. We compared the outcomes of THR trauma cohort with best-matched elective cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 102 patients that underwent THR due to trauma from 2011 to 2013. We had access to 90 cases with complete records. Another 90 matched elective cases were obtained from local arthroplasty database. The elective cases were matched for gender, surgical approaches, surgeon's grade, types of implant, patient's age at operation date of ±5 years and operation date of ±60days. Subsequently, the selection criteria were relaxed to patient's age at operation date of ±10 years and operation date of ±60days. Unmatched cases were excluded. Complications and death rate were compared.

RESULTS

The average age for both cohorts was 70 years. The trauma cohort had statistically significant lower BMI and longer hospital stay (p=0.001). The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) and Charlson Age Comorbidity Index (CACI) were the same for both cohorts, reflecting an active patient selection for THR in our centre. The trauma cohort had higher surgical complication rate (9% vs 4%), particularly higher dislocation rate (7% vs 1%); and higher medical complication rate (32% vs 6%). These were consistent with the literature. Contrary to literature, the trauma cohort had six dislocations that five of them were done via anterolateral approach. Among the eight trauma cases with surgical complications, six cases were performed by trainees. The cause of surgical complications remains unclear due to the nature of retrospective study. The trauma cohort had higher death rate than the elective cohort (14% vs 4%), with one post-operative cardiac arrest in the trauma cohort. The rest were non-orthopaedic related deaths, ranging between four months to four years.

CONCLUSION

A more robust way of selecting trauma patients for THR is warranted to reduce morbidity and mortality. Follow-up for the trauma cohort is warranted, as the patients are likely to outlive the implants.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, nonunion and potential risk factors in Pauwels grade-3 femoral neck fractures: A retrospective cohort study

The present study was to analyze clinical outcome of Pauwels grade-3 femoral neck fractures treated by different surgical techniques. Potential risk factors associated with nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) were investigated as well. The retrospective study comprised of 67 sequential patients treated between January 2008 and December 2011. Patients with Pauwels grade-3 femoral neck fractures were treated by operative reduction and internal fixation. Cannulated screws (CS) were used in 46 patients, dynamic hip screw plus CS (DHS+CS) in 14, and locking compression plate (LCP) for proximal femur in 7. Reduction quality was assessed according to Haidukewych criteria. Postoperative radiographic examinations were conducted to observe fracture healing. Fracture displacement, comminution, fashion of internal fixation, and the sliding effect were analyzed, regarding the incidence of nonunion and ONFH. All patients had a follow-up of 21.6 ± 6.0 months on average. The phenomenon of sliding effect was observed in 16 cases (23.9%). In terms of reduction quality, 64 cases were graded as excellent, 2 were good, and 1 was poor. ONFH was presented in 15 cases (22.4%) and nonunion was found in 8 (11.9%), with 1 patient had ONFH and nonunion concomitantly. Profound hip contour was preserved in 45 cases (67.2%). The fashion of internal fixation yielded different results regarding ONFH and nonunion, whereas the effects of fracture displacement, comminution, and the sliding effect were not significant. ONFH and nonunion were common complications following Pauwels grade-3 femoral neck fractures. Higher incidence of ONFH in DHS+CS and of nonunion in the LCP group should be noted.

Hospital case volume and outcomes for proximal femoral fractures in the USA: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether older adults with isolated hip fractures benefit from treatment in high-volume hospitals.

DESIGN

Population-based observational study.

SETTING

All acute hospitals in California, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

All individuals aged ≥65 that underwent an operation for an isolated hip fracture in California between 2007 and 2011. Patients transferred between hospitals were excluded.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Quality indicators (time to surgery) and patient outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality, unplanned 30-day readmission, and selected complications).

RESULTS

91,401 individuals satisfied the inclusion criteria. Time to operation and length of stay were significantly prolonged in low-volume hospitals, by 1.96 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.73) and 0.70 (0.38 to 1.03) days, respectively. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, 30-day re-admission, and rates of pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that there is no patient safety imperative to limit hip fracture care to high-volume hospitals.