Similar levels of pain are reported in forefoot surgery after management as a day case and admission for 48 hours

The effect of pharmacist-initiated perioperative multidisciplinary pharmaceutical care model and clinical pathway on pain management in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a before-after study

BACKGROUND

Poor pain control is common in perioperative orthopedic surgeries. However, there is a lack of exploration of the clinical pharmacy practice model for this population.

AIM

To construct a perioperative pharmaceutical care model and clinical pathway for patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries and assess their impact on pain management.

METHOD

This historical before-and-after study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics of a tertiary hospital in Guangdong Province, China. The control group was surgical patients who received routine diagnosis and treatment. The intervention group received pain management from a multidisciplinary team based on a pharmacist-initiated pharmaceutical care practice model and clinical pathways for medication management. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pain at rest (PAR) and movement-evoked pain (MEP) scores, number of breakthrough pains, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 320 orthopedic surgery patients were included. Among patients with expected moderate or severe postoperative pain (82.5%), significantly lower PAR and MEP scores were observed in the intervention group 24 h after surgeries compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Compared to the control group, hospital stay in the intervention group was shortened by 2.3 days (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the control of breakthrough pain and the incidence of adverse drug reactions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary perioperative pain management practice models and clinical pathways initiated by pharmacists could improve outcome indicators related to pain management and support the role and value of pharmacists.

Outpatient surgery of the first ray of the foot: post-operative pain monitoring at home

INTRODUCTION

At present, health facilities are forced to switch to outpatient care. While it lends itself well to this organizational arrangement, first ray surgery is broadly considered as painful by patients, who are often reluctant to this treatment. The evolution of post-operative pain in patients who underwent operations for first ray surgery from D0 to D15 were studied. Secondly, the duration of the oral analgesic treatment, the patient's satisfaction level, and searched for complications were assessed.

METHODS

This is an observational, single-center and single-operator study. Between July and December 2019, forty patients who underwent first ray surgery (hallux valgus or rigidus) and eligible for outpatient treatment were included. The surgical technique of the hallux valgus treatment consisted of open surgery via double metatarsal and phalangeal osteotomy. The hallux rigidus surgery consisted of arthrodesis using an open dorsal plate. Home monitoring was carried out by a healthcare provider (e-HORUS). The protocol provided for pain management by means of a diffuser of Nefopam IV for a maximum of 5 days, combined with alleviating oral analgesics 1 and 2 and NSAIDs. The pain was evaluated on D0, D1, D3, D5, D8 and D15, using a numerical scale (NS) from 0 to 10. The degree of patient satisfaction was recorded at 1 month.

RESULTS

35 patients were followed. 5 patients were excluded due to incomplete data. The series included 26 women and 9 men, with an average age of 59.9 years. There were 30 hallux valgus and 5 hallux rigidus. The pain analyzed by the NS was 5.37 on D0, 3.34 on D1, 1.83 on D3, 1.43 on D5, 1.06 on D8 and 2.2 on D15. The average duration of Nefopam infusions was 3.89 days, and the average duration of oral analgesics was 17.7 days. The tolerance of the treatment was satisfactory in 79% of the cases. 69% of patients were very satisfied with the management of their pain. There were no scar complications or infections. No re-hospitalization was necessary. 3 algoneurodystrophies were identified. The existence of fibromyalgia or Parkinsonian syndrome was correlated with higher pain.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Pain management after outpatient first ray surgery using the injectable Nefopam protocol was satisfactory in the majority of cases, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. This protocol is routinely offered to our patients who must undergo first ray surgery.

Is regional ankle block needed in conjunction with general anaesthesia for first ray surgery? A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided ankle block versus "blind" local infiltration

BACKGROUND

Regional anaesthesia is commonly utilised for foot and ankle surgery. Debate remains at to the level of regional anaesthesia that is required. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether surgeon-delivered "blind" local anaesthetic infiltration around the first ray (metatarsal block without ultrasound guidance) was as effective as an ultrasound guided ankle block in providing post-operative analgesia after osseous first ray surgery performed under general anaesthetic.

METHODS

50 patients were recruited to a single surgeon and anaesthetist double-blinded randomised controlled trial at a single-centre. 20mls of 0.5% levobupivacaine was used to perform either an ankle or metatarsal nerve block.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients completed the study: 25 in the ankle block treatment arm and 23 in the metatarsal block arm. The demographics were comparable between groups. There was no statistical difference in visual analogue pain scores at two (21.3 vs 15.2), six (23.6 vs 20.8) and 24 (42.2 vs 50.4) hours following the procedure between the two groups (metatarsal block vs ankle block). Metatarsal block groups had a faster return of normal sensation (2.3 vs 2.8h) but there was no difference in time to safe mobilisation (2.6 vs 2.8h).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of surgeon delivered "blind" metatarsal block is comparable to an ultrasound guided ankle block for first ray surgery performed under general anaesthetic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Ultrasound-guided ankle block. History revisited

Following forefoot surgery, compared to the traditional multimodal approach, regional anesthesia and analgesia provides high quality pain relief, decreases opioids consumption and leads to very high satisfaction scores. Traditional regional techniques relied either on wound infiltration, landmark technique ankle blocks or popliteal sciatic nerve block. Numerous anatomic variations of the different nerves might lead to failure following a blind technique. The current evolution towards ambulatory care will push surgical teams to favor techniques that simplify postoperative treatment and encourages immediate ambulation. The development of Ultrasound Guided Blocks has enabled us to perform very selective and precise nerve blocks. Ankle blocks provide excellent intraoperative anesthesia as well as long postoperative pain relief. Complications are rare using regional anesthesia for postoperative analgesia even after extensive foot surgery. Revival of ankle blocks is a perfect example of the high impact of new technological advances in improving ambulatory surgical care after foot surgery.

Effects of using WeChat-assisted perioperative care instructions for parents of pediatric patients undergoing day surgery for herniorrhaphy

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of WeChat-assisted perioperative instructions for parents whose children were to undergo herniorrhaphy.

METHOD

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a day surgery center in China. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (WeChat) group (n = 209) and the control (Leaflet) group (n = 209). The primary outcomes of this study were parents' knowledge regarding hernia and rate of cancellation of children's surgery. The secondary outcomes were the rate of lost-to-follow-up and the rate of complications and adverse events during the seventh postoperative follow-up day.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the rate of cancelling the surgery and the mean knowledge score between the WeChat group and leaflet groups. The lost-to-follow-up rate was significantly lower in the WeChat group (0.54%) than in the leaflet group (3.66%). The incidence of postoperative complications were higher in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

WeChat-assisted perioperative care instructions enhanced parents' knowledge on perioperative instructions and promoted the preparation of their children for day surgery resulting in lower rate of cancelling the surgery.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

WeChat has the ability to expand health services outside the hospital confines and could be used as an important low-cost health educational medium in China.

Developments in ambulatory surgery in orthopedics in France in 2016

Under the new categorization introduced by the Health Authorities, ambulatory surgery (AS) in France now accounts for 50% of procedures, taking all surgical specialties together. The replacement of full hospital admission by AS is now well established and recognized. Health-care centers have learned, in coordination with the medico-surgical and paramedical teams, how to set up AS units and the corresponding clinical pathways. There is no single model handed down from above. The authorities have encouraged these developments, partly by regulations but also by means of financial incentives. Patient eligibility and psychosocial criteria are crucial determining factors for the success of the AS strategy. The surgeons involved are strongly committed. Feedback from many orthopedic subspecialties (shoulder, foot, knee, spine, hand, large joints, emergency and pediatric surgery) testify to the rise of AS, which now accounts for 41% of all orthopedic procedures. Questions remain, however, concerning the role of the GP in the continuity of care, the role of innovation and teaching, the creation of new jobs, and the attractiveness of AS for surgeons. More than ever, it is the patient who is "ambulatory", within an organized structure in which surgical technique and pain management are well controlled. Not all patients can be eligible, but the AS concept is becoming standard, and overnight stay will become a matter for medical and surgical prescription.