Do you have an infection problem?

Getting it right first time: national survey of surgical site infection 2019

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Deep SSI, or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), is associated with revision surgery involving longer operative times with higher infection rates, longer length of stay (LoS) and high costs in addition to the catastrophic effect on the patient. The surveillance of SSI is important for patient decision making, identification of outliers for support and maximising focussed improvement. This paper reports the findings of the second Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) national SSI survey for orthopaedic and spinal surgery.

Methods

Data were submitted prospectively by 67 orthopaedic units and 22 spinal units between 1 May 2019 and 31 October 2019. For a patient to be included, they had to present with SSI within the study period and within 1 year of the index procedure.

Results

A total of 309 SSIs were reported from primary and revision, total hip, knee, shoulder, elbow and ankle replacements, and 58 SSIs were reported from lumbar spine single level discectomy or decompression, lumbar spine single-level instrumented posterior fusion, posterior cervical spine decompression and instrumented fusion and posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SSIs rates have remained low compared with the 2017 survey. There were variations in SSI rates by procedure, with primary shoulder replacement reporting the lowest (0.4%) and revision shoulder replacement the highest (2.5%) rates.

Conclusions

The authors recommend that the elective surgical restart following the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity for all units to implement a full SSI prevention bundle to minimise the risk of infection and improve patient outcomes.

Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with alpha-defensin using a lateral flow device: a multicentre study

AIMS

The purpose of this current multicentre study is to analyse the presence of alpha-defensin proteins in synovial fluid using the Synovasure lateral flow device and to determine its diagnostic reliability and accuracy compared with the prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria produced by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 121 patients comprising 85 total knee arthroplasties and 36 total hip arthroplasties was prospectively evaluated between May 2015 and June 2016 in three different orthopaedic centres. The tests were performed on patients with a chronically painful prosthesis undergoing a joint aspiration in a diagnostic pathway or during revision surgery.

RESULTS

Based on the MSIS criteria, 34 patients (28%) would have had a PJI, and 87 patients had no PJI. Testing with the lateral flow device had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 84.5 to 99.9) and a specificity of 96.6% (95% CI 90.3 to 99.2). The positive predictive value was 91.7% (95% CI 77.7% to 98.3), and the negative predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI 93.6 to 99.9). Receiver operator characteristics analysis demonstrated an area under the curve for the Synovasure test of 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the Synovasure test has an excellent diagnostic performance to confirm or reject the diagnosis of a PJI. The results are promising for the care of the painful or problematic knee and hip joint arthroplasty and the test should be considered as part of the diagnostic toolbox for PJIs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1176-82.

Primary hip and knee arthroplasty in a temporary operating theatre is associated with a significant increase in deep periprosthetic infection

Aims

Infection following total hip or knee arthroplasty is a serious complication. We noted an increase in post-operative infection in cases carried out in temporary operating theatres. We therefore compared those cases performed in standard and temporary operating theatres and examined the deep periprosthetic infection rates.

Patients and methods

A total of 1223 primary hip and knee arthroplasties were performed between August 2012 and June 2013. A total of 539 (44%) were performed in temporary theatres. The two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade.

Results

The deep infection rate for standard operating theatres was 0 of 684 (0%); for temporary theatres it was eight of 539 (1.5%) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Use of a temporary operating theatre for primary hip and knee arthroplasty was associated with an unacceptable increase in deep infection. We do not advocate the use of these theatres for primary joint arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:917–20.

Orthopaedic surgical site infection surveillance in NHS England: national audit of current practice

AIMS

The importance of accurate identification and reporting of surgical site infection (SSI) is well recognised but poorly defined. Public Health England (PHE) mandated collection of orthopaedic SSI data in 2004. Data submission is required in one of four categories (hip prosthesis, knee prosthesis, repair of neck of femur, reduction of long bone fracture) for one quarter per year. Trusts are encouraged to carry out post-discharge surveillance but this is not mandatory. Recent papers in the orthopaedic literature have highlighted the importance of SSI surveillance and the heterogeneity of surveillance methods. However, details of current orthopaedic SSI surveillance practice has not been described or quantified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 147 NHS trusts in England were audited using a structured questionnaire. Data was collected in the following categories: data collection; data submission to PHE; definitions used; resource constraints; post-discharge surveillance and SSI rates in the four PHE categories. The response rate was 87.7%.

RESULTS

Variation in practice was clear in all categories in terms of methods and timings of data collection and data submission. There was little agreement on SSI definitions. At least six different definitions were used, some trusts using more than one definition. Post-discharge surveillance was carried out by 62% of respondents but there was again variation in both the methods and staff used. More than half of the respondents felt that SSI surveillance in their unit was limited by resource constraints. SSI rates ranged from 0% to 10%.

CONCLUSION

This paper quantifies the heterogeneity of SSI surveillance in England. It highlights the importance of adequate resourcing and the unreliability of relying on voluntary data collection and submission. Conformity of definitions and methods are recommended to enable meaningful SSI data to be collated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:171-4.