Dual HER2 gene protein assay: focused study of breast cancers with 2+ immunohistochemical expression

Evaluation of analytical accuracy of HER2 status in patients with breast cancer: Comparison of HER2 GPA with HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene status and overexpression, occurring in ~ 13.6% of primary breast cancers, is essential for identifying patients likely to benefit from biological treatment. In this method of evaluation study, we tested and compared the HER2 gene-protein assay (GPA) with routine HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The GPA was evaluated using 67 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) HER2 equivoval IHC (2+) breast cancer tissue samples. Overall, agreement between GPA silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and FISH was 91.9% (57/62). Regression analysis revealed slightly higher, but non-significant difference in HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio for GPA as compared to FISH (p = 0.074). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.94 and Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients of 0.93 (p < 0.0001) for FISH and GPA SISH suggested strong inter-observer association for methods with one observer counting on average 0.23 significant higher for GPA SISH (p = 0.014). Intra-observer IHC method reproducibility was 52.6% (κ = 0.3122, p = 0.004) and 79.7% (κ = 0.6428, p = 0.9197), suggesting fair significant and substantial non-significant difference between tests for reviewers. Inter-observer reproducibility for IHC methods was 53%. While inter-observer reproducibility for experienced IHC interpretation suggested significant differences (κ = 0.3636, p = 0.0332), unexperienced interpretation of IHC GPA suggested fair non-significant difference between reviewers (κ = 0.3101, p = 0.0747). Using FISH as reference, the diagnostic indices for GPA SISH were as follows: sensitivity 100%, specificity 95% and accuracy 92%. Inaccuracy between tests was in 80% of cases due to ISH categorization as equivocal by one of the methods. IHC results highlight that it may be beneficial with a method for simultaneously visualization of HER2 gene and protein status.

HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity is independently associated with distal metastasis and overall survival in HER2-positive breast carcinomas

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) occurs in a subset of breast cancers. Our recent study revealed it as an independent predictive factor for the response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy. In this study, we aimed to investigate its association with distal metastasis.

METHODS

HER2 ITH was assessed using HER2 gene protein assay (GPA) on whole tissue sections of pretreatment biopsies from a cohort of 158 HER2-positive invasive breast carcinomas and correlated with patients' clinical follow-up outcomes along with other clinicopathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven cases (36%) showed HER2 ITH including 19 with genetic, 8 with both genetic and non-genetic, and 30 with non-genetic ITH. Multivariate analysis demonstrated larger tumor size, positive resected lymph node(s), negative PR, and the presence of HER2 ITH were independently associated with distal metastasis. Additionally, multivariate analysis demonstrated larger tumor size and the presence of HER2 ITH were the only independent factors associated with decreased overall survival (death).

CONCLUSION

The presence of HER2 ITH is an independent factor associated with poor overall survival and increased distal metastasis in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

HER2 immunohistochemistry inter-observer reproducibility in 205 cases of invasive breast carcinoma additionally tested by ISH

Assessment of HER2 biomarker in invasive breast carcinoma patients allows a specific therapeutic approach. Clinical guidelines indicate immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) to test HER2, however both have drawbacks which results in low reproducibility of results especially in equivocal cases. Our main objective is to quantify inter-observer IHC reproducibility and cross it with the ISH result. Our series includes 205 invasive breast carcinoma cases sent for ISH retest from 14 hospitals, 5 observers to assess the IHC and 2 observers for the ISH of each case. We found that the observers only achieve an absolute agreement for IHC in 1 out of 3 cases. The inter-observer concordance for IHC is low (0.2 ≤ k ≤ 0.4) or moderate (0.41 ≤ k ≤ 0.6). In ISH positive cases the concordance for IHC is higher than in the ISH negative cases. In conclusion, the study shows low and moderate IHC inter-observer concordance, finding the more worrying values among the ISH negative cases which are the most part of this particular sample. Subjective interpretation of the techniques, among other factors, has negative impact in HER2 evaluation. To offset this limitation we have checked that reaching a consensus from different observers for HER2 IHC assessment improves the results.

Identification of HER2 Immunohistochemistry-Negative, FISH-Amplified Breast Cancers and Their Response to Anti-HER2 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Objectives

Either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) can be used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Breast cancers (BCs) with HER2 IHC-negative (IHC-) and ISH-amplified (ISH+) results have been rarely reported but not well studied. We investigated the frequency of HER2 IHC-/ISH+ BCs and their response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods

Seventeen BCs with HER2 IHC-/ISH+ results were identified from 1,107 consecutive invasive BCs (1.5%, 17/1,107).

Results

Gene protein assay confirmed the original HER2 IHC and ISH results. Increased HER2 RNA level was detected in HER2 IHC-/ISH+ cases compared with HER2 IHC-/ISH- cases. Eight patients had anti-HER2 NAC; three had pathologic complete response, and five had residual tumors.

Conclusions

A small percentage of patients (1.5%) showed discordant HER2 IHC and ISH results (IHC-/ISH+) and would have lost the opportunity for potentially beneficial anti-HER2-targeted therapy if only HER2 IHC testing had been used.

Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits

AIMS

Genetic heterogeneity can pose a challenge to identifying eligible cases for targeted therapy in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ breast carcinoma group. In this study, we characterised this subset of tumours according to clinicopathological parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed 1000 tumour cells per case and recorded the number of HER2 and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) copies using gene-protein assay slides. HER2 status was determined based on ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines. Tumours with 5-50% of cancer cells with amplification were considered to be heterogeneous, whereas those with >50% were considered to be non-heterogeneous. In a study cohort of 110 HER2 IHC 2+ carcinomas, 93 (84.5%) were non-amplified, 12 (10.9%) were amplified and five (4.5%) were ISH-equivocal. All the HER2-amplified and two of ISH-equivocal cases (12.7%) corresponded to non-heterogeneous tumours, with highly significant differences evident in the average HER2/CEP17 ratio (P = 0.0002) and the proportion of cells with HER2 >6 copies (P < 0.0001) compared with heterogeneous lesions. NST grade 3 and HER2-amplified carcinomas average HER2/CEP17 ratio correlated with an increased number of cells with HER2/CEP17 ≥2.0 (P < 0.014). Triple-negative CEP17 polysomic carcinomas showed increased metastatic capacity (P = 0.003) compared with other tumour types.

CONCLUSION

Non-heterogeneous HER2 IHC 2+ tumours tend to be HER2-amplified. Adding the percentage of cells with HER2 >6 copies to the average HER2/CEP17 ratio may facilitate assessment of amplification status in ISH-equivocal cases. The proportion of cells with HER2/CEP17 ≥2.0 contributes information concerning the actual average HER2/CEP17 ratio, depending on tumour type.

Molecular Testing in Breast Cancer: A Guide to Current Practices

CONTEXT

-Molecular diagnostics play a role in the management of many cancers, including breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

-To provide an update on molecular testing in current clinical practice, targeted at practicing pathologists who are not breast cancer specialists.

DATA SOURCES

-This study is a narrative literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

-In addition to routine hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptor testing, new and recurrent tumors are tested for HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization or overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Intrinsic subtyping of tumors represents a fundamental advance in our understanding of breast cancer biology, but currently it has an indirect role in patient management. Clinical next-generation sequencing (tumor profiling) is increasingly used to identify potentially actionable mutations in tumor tissue. Multianalyte assays with algorithmic analysis, including MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and Prosigna, play a larger role in breast cancer than in many other malignancies. Given that a proportion of breast cancers are familial, testing of nontumor tissue for cancer predisposition mutations also plays a role in breast cancer care.

HER2 Gene Protein Assay Is Useful to Determine HER2 Status and Evaluate HER2 Heterogeneity in HER2 Equivocal Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 15% of breast cancers show equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) results on HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and are reflexed for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, some cases remain equivocal. In this study, we evaluated these double-equivocal cases by using a novel gene protein assay (GPA), which can simultaneously assess HER2 gene copy number and protein on a single slide using bright-field microscopy.

METHODS

GPA was performed on 42 HER2 IHC and FISH double-equivocal cases.

RESULTS

GPA was negative for amplification in 28 cases, equivocal in three cases, and positive in 11 cases. The GPA results showed excellent concordance with either repeat FISH using a chromosome 17 centromere probe or FISH using an alternative probe. Furthermore, HER2 heterogeneity was identified in three of 11 GPA-positive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 GPA performs accurately and is very useful to determine HER2 status in HER2 IHC and FISH double-equivocal breast cancer cases and identify HER2 heterogeneity.

HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity analyses by concurrent HER2 gene and protein assessment for the prognosis of HER2 negative invasive breast cancer patients

HER2 gene-protein assay (GPA) is a new method for the simultaneous evaluation of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) on single tissue sections of breast cancer. We investigated the presence of HER2 gene and protein discrepancy and HER2-heterogeneity using HER2-GPA. HER2 status was analyzed for the correlation between the presence of HER2-heterogeneity and patient prognosis. Consecutive 280 invasive breast cancer were examined. Statuses of HER2 protein and gene were evaluated in whole tumor sections of HER2 GPA slides. HER2 protein and gene combination patterns were classified to six phenotypic and genotypic types for each case, as well as at individual cell levels: (A) IHC and DISH positive; (B) IHC positive and DISH negative; (C) IHC equivocal and DISH positive; (D) IHC equivocal and DISH negative; (E) IHC negative and DISH positive; and (F) IHC and DISH negative. The presence of HER2-heterogeneity was determined by the existence of at least two of six types within one tumor. HER2-IHC positive patients had significantly worse survival than IHC negative patients and HER2-DISH positive patients had significantly worse survival than DISH negative patients. HER2 IHC negative and DISH positive patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival than IHC and DISH negative patients. In the HER2 IHC and DISH negative group, the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Notably, among triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Our study suggests that the presence of HER2-heterogeneity might be a prognostic factor in HER2 negative breast cancer patients, especially in TNBC.