Comparison of anti-estrogen receptor antibodies SP1, 6F11, and 1D5 in breast cancer: lower 1D5 sensitivity but questionable clinical implications

Breast biomarkers evolution between primary and distant metastasis: incidence and significance

AIMS

To evaluate the evolution when breast cancer (BC) is classified as three clinical profiles and five clinical profiles by incorporating human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low to the biomarkers' profile.

METHODS AND RESULTS

BC with distant metastasis that has document hormonal receptors (HR) (positive, negative) and HER2 (positive, low, zero) results were included (n = 161). Cases were categorised into three clinical profiles (HR-positive/HER2-negative, HER2-positive and TNBC) and five (HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, HR-negative/HER2-low, HR-positive or negative/HER2-positive). Evolution occurred in 22.4% cases when three clinical profiles were analysed and 36.6% considering five clinical profiles. There were no statistically significant differences among the three clinical profiles in overall survival (OS). When five clinical profiles were analysed, HR-negative/HER2-zero had the worst OS with HzR = 6.82 and 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.19, 39.23, P = 0.031. In the multivariable analysis, ER-positive was associated with HER2 discordance less than oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative with odds ratio (OR) = 0.354 and 95% CI = 0.14-0.88, P = 0.025. In the multivariable analysis, patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2+ had worse OS with hazard ratio (HzR) = 5.54 and 95% CI = 2.4-12.79, P < 0.0001. HR concordant had better OS with HzR = 0.34 and 95% CI = 0.2-0.63, P = 0.0004. HER2 conversion from low to zero had worse OS than HER2 concordance with HzR 2.66 and 95% CI = 1.21-5.83, P = 0.015.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-profile classification provides a more accurate idea about the rate of potential change in treating BC in the metastatic setting.

Biomarkers in high grade serous ovarian cancer

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer. HGSC patients typically present with advanced disease, which is often resistant to chemotherapy and recurs despite initial responses to therapy, resulting in the poor prognosis associated with this disease. There is a need to utilise biomarkers to manage the various aspects of HGSC patient care. In this review we discuss the current state of biomarkers in HGSC, focusing on the various available immunohistochemical (IHC) and blood-based biomarkers, which have been examined for their diagnostic, prognostic and theranostic potential in HGSC. These include various routine clinical IHC biomarkers such as p53, WT1, keratins, PAX8, Ki67 and p16 and clinical blood-borne markers and algorithms such as CA125, HE4, ROMA, RMI, ROCA, and others. We also discuss various components of the liquid biopsy as well as a number of novel IHC biomarkers and non-routine blood-borne biomarkers, which have been examined in various ovarian cancer studies. We also discuss the future of ovarian cancer biomarker research and highlight some of the challenges currently facing the field.

External Quality Assurance Helps Improve Infrastructure for Testing Breast Biomarkers Across a Lower- and Middle-Income Country: Our Experience With Breast Biomarker Testing in the National Cancer Grid External Quality Assurance System in India

CONTEXT.—

Biomarkers in breast cancer need strict monitoring given their role in patient management.

OBJECTIVE.—

To study the impact that regular participation in the National Cancer Grid (NCG) external quality assurance (EQA) system has on concordance rates for biomarkers in breast carcinoma.

DESIGN.—

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing breast carcinomas were circulated to participating laboratories that performed immunohistochemistry for breast biomarkers. The returned TMAs were then assessed for test concordance.

RESULTS.—

A total of 105 laboratories participated in the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) EQA system cycles, and 99 centers participated in the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) EQA system. In the ER EQA in the first cycle only 1 laboratory had a 100% concordance rate, which improved to 59 of 77 (76.6%) and 85 of 97 (87.6%) in the fourth and fifth cycles, respectively. In the PR EQA the 100% pass rate jumped from zero to 52 of 76 (68.4%) in the fourth cycle and 86 of 97 (88.6%) in the last cycle. For HER2 EQA, the 100% pass rates were seen in 7 of 23 laboratories (30.4%) in the first cycle, 49 of 78 laboratories (62.8%) in the fourth cycle, and 48 of 94 laboratories (51.1%) in fifth cycle of EQA. Centers that participated in the NCG EQA system for a longer period often changed testing methodology, with consequent improvement in their laboratory concordance rates. An increasing trend for the use of automated platforms and of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody for HER2 testing was observed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Our experience demonstrates that laboratory performance improves with participation in an EQA system even in less perfect settings, and this drives the placement of more proficient practices across the country.

Functional and Phenotypic Characterisations of Common Syngeneic Tumour Cell Lines as Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Models

Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers (ER+ BCas) are the most common form of BCa and are increasing in incidence, largely due to changes in reproductive practices in recent decades. Tamoxifen is prescribed as a component of standard-of-care endocrine therapy for the treatment and prevention of ER+ BCa. However, it is poorly tolerated, leading to low uptake of the drug in the preventative setting. Alternative therapies and preventatives for ER+ BCa are needed but development is hampered due to a paucity of syngeneic ER+ preclinical mouse models that allow pre-clinical experimentation in immunocompetent mice. Two ER-positive models, J110 and SSM3, have been reported in addition to other tumour models occasionally shown to express ER (for example 4T1.2, 67NR, EO771, D2.0R and D2A1). Here, we have assessed ER expression and protein levels in seven mouse mammary tumour cell lines and their corresponding tumours, in addition to their cellular composition, tamoxifen sensitivity and molecular phenotype. By immunohistochemical assessment, SSM3 and, to a lesser extent, 67NR cells are ER+. Using flow cytometry and transcript expression we show that SSM3 cells are luminal in nature, whilst D2.0R and J110 cells are stromal/basal. The remainder are also stromal/basal in nature; displaying a stromal or basal Epcam/CD49f FACS phenotype and stromal and basal gene expression signatures are overrepresented in their transcript profile. Consistent with a luminal identity for SSM3 cells, they also show sensitivity to tamoxifen in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the data indicate that the SSM3 syngeneic cell line is the only definitively ER+ mouse mammary tumour cell line widely available for pre-clinical research.

The Co-Expression of Estrogen Receptors ERα, ERβ, and GPER in Endometrial Cancer

Estrogens have important roles in endometrial cancer (EC) and exert biological effects through the classical estrogen receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ, and the G-protein-coupled ER, GPER. So far, the co-expression of these three types of ERs has not been studied in EC. We investigated ERα, ERβ, GPER mRNA and protein levels, and their intracellular protein distributions in EC tissue and in adjacent control endometrial tissue. Compared to control endometrial tissue, immunoreactivity for ERα in EC tissue was weaker for nuclei with minor, but unchanged, cytoplasmic staining; mRNA and protein levels showed decreased patterns for ERα in EC tissue. For ERβ, across both tissue types, the immunoreactivity was unchanged for nuclei and cytoplasm, although EC tissues again showed lower mRNA and protein levels compared to adjacent control endometrial tissue. The immunoreactivity of GPER as well as mRNA levels of GPER were unchanged across cancer and control endometrial tissues, while protein levels were lower in EC tissue. Statistically significant correlations of estrogen receptor α (ESR1) versus estrogen receptor β (ESR2) and GPER variant 3,4 versus ESR1 and ESR2 was seen at the mRNA level. At the protein level studied with Western blotting, there was significant correlation of ERα versus GPER, and ERβ versus GPER. While in clinical practice the expression of ERα is routinely tested in EC tissue, ERβ and GPER need to be further studied to examine their potential as prognostic markers, provided that specific and validated antibodies are available.

Impact of estrogen receptor expression on prognosis of ovarian cancer according to antibody clone used for immunohistochemistry: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes ER⍺ and ERβ in ovarian cancer has previously been evaluated by meta-analyses. However, the results are contradictory and controversial.

METHODS

We conducted an updated meta-analysis with stringent inclusion criteria to ensure homogeneous studies to determine the effect of ER subtypes on ovarian cancer prognosis. Articles were retrieved by systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science for articles dated up to June 2021. Only studies with known hazard ratio (HR) and antibody clone for immunochemistry (IHC) were included. Pooled HRs with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the effect of ER⍺ and ERβ expression on ovarian cancer patient progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included, of which 11 and 13 studies examined the relationships between ER⍺ expression and PFS and OS, respectively, and 5 and 7 studies examined the relationships between ERβ expression and PFS and OS, respectively. Neither ER⍺ expression (random-effects model; HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.83-1.18) nor ERβ expression (fixed-effects model; HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.69-1.27) was associated with PFS. Random-effects models showed that ER⍺ expression (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.02) and ERβ expression (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.50-1.13) were only marginally and not significantly associated with better OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that ER⍺ expression determined using antibody clone 1D5 (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.64-0.88) and ERβ expression determined using ERβ1-specific-antibody clone PPG5/10 or EMR02 (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.50-0.86) were associated with significantly better OS, but ER expression determined using other antibodies was not.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a higher ER⍺ expression and ERβ expression are significantly associated with a better survival of ovarian cancer patients, but the results from previous prognostic studies are significantly dependent on the choice of specific ER antibody clones used in immunohistochemistry analysis.

High expression of progesterone receptor may be an adverse prognostic factor in oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer: results of comprehensive re-evaluation of multi-institutional case series

Oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative (-) progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive (+) is the least common combination of steroid receptor expression observed in breast cancer. There are many controversies regarding the actual existence of ER-/PgR+ phenotype. In the current study, we aimed to perform comprehensive immunohistochemical re-evaluation of ER-/PgR+ breast cancers from multiple institutions. A total of 135 cases of ER-/PgR+ breast cancer were collected from 11 institutions from the period 2006-2020 and subsequently stained with three clinically validated anti-ER antibody clones: SP1 (Roche), 1D5 (Dako), and EP1 (Dako), and two anti-PgR antibody clones: 636 (Dako), and 1E2 (Roche). Clinicopathological characteristics of confirmed and re-categorised cases were analysed. Seventy-six cases retained the original ER-/PgR+ phenotype, including 21 HER2+ and 55 HER2- tumours. Forty-seven cases were ER+ with at least one anti-ER antibody, and 12 cases were re-categorised as double-negatives across all anti-ER and anti-PgR antibodies. No significant differences in survival were observed between groups in the HER2+ category. In the HER2- cohort, confirmed ER-/PgR+, ER+ tumours with discrepant ER staining, and triple negatives had inferior overall survival compared to concordant ER+ cases. Progesterone receptor expression in >20% of cells was identified as an adverse prognostic factor in ER-/PgR+/HER2- breast cancer in a multivariable model adjusted by stage (HR 5.0, 95% CI 1.3-19.2, p=0.019). We performed one of the largest validation studies so far on ER-/PgR+ breast cancer and confirmed the existence of this subgroup. Moreover, we identified high PgR expression as an adverse prognostic factor.

Single-cell immunoblotting resolves estrogen receptor-α isoforms in breast cancer

An array of isoforms of the nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) protein contribute to heterogeneous response in breast cancer (BCa); yet, a single-cell analysis tool that distinguishes the full-length ER-α66 protein from the activation function-1 deficient ER-α46 isoform has not been reported. Specific detection of protein isoforms is a gap in single-cell analysis tools, as the de facto standard immunoassay requires isoform-specific antibody probes. Consequently, to scrutinize hormone response heterogeneity among BCa tumor cells, we develop a precision tool to specifically measure ER-α66, ER- α46, and eight ER-signaling proteins with single-cell resolution in the highly hetero-clonal MCF-7 BCa cell line. With a literature-validated pan-ER immunoprobe, we distinguish ER-α66 from ER-α46 in each individual cell. We identify ER-α46 in 5.5% of hormone-sensitive (MCF-7) and 4.2% of hormone-insensitive (MDA-MB-231) BCa cell lines. To examine whether the single-cell immunoblotting can capture cellular responses to hormones, we treat cells with tamoxifen and identify different sub-populations of ER-α46: (i) ER-α46 induces phospho-AKT at Ser473, (ii) S6-ribosomal protein, an upstream ER target, activates both ER-α66 and ER-α46 in MCF-7 cells, and (iii) ER-α46 partitions MDA-MB-231 subpopulations, which are responsive to tamoxifen. Unlike other single-cell immunoassays, multiplexed single-cell immunoblotting reports–in the same cell–tamoxifen effects on ER signaling proteins and on distinct isoforms of the ER-α protein.

Immunohistological expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, mammaglobin, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and GATA-binding protein 3 in non-small-cell lung cancer

AIMS

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer are common entities. Staining for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), mammaglobin (MAMG) and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) is frequently performed to confirm a mammary origin in the appropriate diagnostic setting. However, comprehensive data on the immunohistological expression of these markers in NSCLC are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse a large cohort of NSCLCs and correlate the staining results with clinicopathological variables.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tissue microarray was stained for ER, PgR, MAMG, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and GATA3, and included 636 adenocarcinomas (ADCs), 536 squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs), 65 large-cell-carcinomas, 34 pleomorphic carcinomas, and 20 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. HER2 status was determined for immunohistochemically positive cases with chromogenic in-situ hybridisation. Markers with a proportion of ≥5% positive cases in ADC and SqCC were considered for survival analysis. Among ADCs, 62 (10%), 17 (3%), one (<1%), seven (1%), and 49 (8%) cases were positive for ER, PgR, MAMG, HER2, and GATA3, respectively. Among SqCCs, 10 (2%), 14 (3%), two (<1%) and 109 (20%) cases were positive for ER, PgR, HER2, and GATA3, but none of the samples showed positivity for MAMG. ER positivity was associated with ADC, female sex, smaller tumour size, and lower clinical stage. None of the markers had an impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

We report on ER, PgR, MAMG, HER2 and GATA3 expression in a large cohort of NSCLCs. Interpretation of these markers in the differential diagnostic setting should be based on a multimarker panel.

Hormone receptor expression and outcomes in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSC) are frequently ER/PR positive, though the mechanisms by which ER/PR regulate prognosis or anti-estrogen treatment efficacy are poorly understood. We studied ER/PR expression in LGSC tumors and cell lines to evaluate patient outcomes and cellular treatment responses.

METHODS

LGSC tumors and patient-derived cell lines were studied from patients with advanced-stage (III/IV) disease. Tumor samples and clinical data were obtained from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR-tissue microarray) and the Ovarian Cancer Research (OvCaRe) tissue bank. ER/PR expression was assessed by both Western blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Two different IHC scoring systems (simple and Allred) were used. Cox regression was used to identify factors (age, disease residuum, ER/PR status, etc.) associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Estradiol and tamoxifen proliferation and viability experiments were performed in LGSC cell lines.

RESULTS

In 55 LGSC cases studied, median follow-up was 56 months (range 1-227). Fifty-three (96%) cases strongly expressed ER whereas 37 (67%) expressed PR. Cox-regression analysis showed that residuum (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with PFS, whereas both ER Allred score (p = 0.005) and residuum (p = 0.004) were significant for OS. None of the LGSC cell lines expressed PR. Loss of PR and ER expression over time was detected in LGSC tumors and cell lines respectively. Estrogen and tamoxifen treatment did not alter LGSC cell proliferation or viability in-vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced LGSC, higher ER Allred scores were significantly associated with better overall survival. ER/PR expression changed over time in both LGSC tumors and cell lines. Better translational research models are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of ER/PR signalling in LGSC.

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Assess Hormonal Status From Tissue Microarrays in Patients With Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most widely used assay for identification of molecular biomarkers. However, IHC is time consuming and costly, depends on tissue-handling protocols, and relies on pathologists' subjective interpretation. Image analysis by machine learning is gaining ground for various applications in pathology but has not been proposed to replace chemical-based assays for molecular detection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prediction feasibility of molecular expression of biomarkers in cancer tissues, relying only on tissue architecture as seen in digitized hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained specimens.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-institution retrospective diagnostic study assessed the breast cancer tissue microarrays library of patients from Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada. The study and analysis were conducted from July 1, 2015, through July 1, 2018. A machine learning method, termed morphological-based molecular profiling (MBMP), was developed. Logistic regression was used to explore correlations between histomorphology and biomarker expression, and a deep convolutional neural network was used to predict the biomarker expression in examined tissues.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve measures of MBMP for assessment of molecular biomarkers.

RESULTS

The database consisted of 20 600 digitized, publicly available H&E-stained sections of 5356 patients with breast cancer from 2 cohorts. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years for cohort 1 (412 patients) and 62 years for cohort 2 (4944 patients), and the median follow-up was 12.0 years and 12.4 years, respectively. Tissue histomorphology was significantly correlated with the molecular expression of all 19 biomarkers assayed, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and ERBB2 (formerly HER2). Expression of ER was predicted for 105 of 207 validation patients in cohort 1 (50.7%) and 1059 of 2046 validation patients in cohort 2 (51.8%), with PPVs of 97% and 98%, respectively, NPVs of 68% and 76%, respectively, and accuracy of 91% and 92%, respectively, which were noninferior to traditional IHC (PPV, 91%-98%; NPV, 51%-78%; and accuracy, 81%-90%). Diagnostic accuracy improved given more data. Morphological analysis of patients with ER-negative/PR-positive status by IHC revealed resemblance to patients with ER-positive status (Bhattacharyya distance, 0.03) and not those with ER-negative/PR-negative status (Bhattacharyya distance, 0.25). This suggests a false-negative IHC finding and warrants antihormonal therapy for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For at least half of the patients in this study, MBMP appeared to predict biomarker expression with noninferiority to IHC. Results suggest that prediction accuracy is likely to improve as data used for training expand. Morphological-based molecular profiling could be used as a general approach for mass-scale molecular profiling based on digitized H&E-stained images, allowing quick, accurate, and inexpensive methods for simultaneous profiling of multiple biomarkers in cancer tissues.

Oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive phenotype of invasive breast carcinoma in Japan: re-evaluated using immunohistochemical staining

Background

The existence of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast carcinoma is controversial. Here, we re-evaluated ER-negative/PgR-positive (ER−/PgR+) carcinoma cases by immunohistochemical staining (IHC).

Materials and methods

We selected patients who underwent surgery for primary breast carcinoma from our databases at Dokkyo Medical University Hospital and Kameda General Hospital. Among the 9844 patients, the largest series in Japan, 27 (0.3%) were initially diagnosed as ER−/PgR+ breast carcinomas and we re-evaluated by IHC.

Results

The re-evaluated IHC showed that of the 27 patients with the initial results of ER−/PgR+, 12 were ER+/PgR+, 8 were ER−/PgR−, and 7 were ER−/PgR+. ER was negative in 12 of 27 patients (44.4%), and PgR was positive in 8 of 27 patients (29.6%). In our seven re-evaluated and confirmed as ER−/PgR+ cases, the staining proportions of tumor cells were 0% in ER and 1–69% (average 15.8%) in PgR. The average staining proportion of PgR in the re-evaluated ER−/PgR+ phenotype was lower than the initial diagnosis. Histological grading was as follows: grade I, one case; grade II, two cases; grade III, four cases. There were two lymph-node-positive cases.

Conclusions

The ER−/PgR+ phenotype was confirmed after re-evaluation of ER and PgR assessment by a different pathologist. We recommend that pathologists discuss with clinicians, or re-test and re-evaluate ER/PgR expression, particularly in low-grade carcinoma and with a high staining proportion of PgR in the ER−/PgR+ phenotype.

Quantitative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Laboratory Performance by Measuring Analytic Response Curves and Limits of Detection

Context.—

Numerous studies highlight interlaboratory performance variability in diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Despite substantial improvements over the years, the inability to quantitatively and objectively assess immunostain sensitivity complicates interlaboratory standardization.

Objective.—

To quantitatively and objectively assess the sensitivity of the immunohistochemical stains for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) across IHC laboratories in a proficiency testing format. We measure sensitivity with parameters that are new to the field of diagnostic IHC: analytic response curves and limits of detection.

Design.—

Thirty-nine diagnostic IHC laboratories stained a set of 3 slides, one each for HER2, ER, and PR. Each slide incorporated a positive tissue section and IHControls at 5 different concentrations. The IHControls comprise cell-sized clear microbeads coated with defined concentrations of analyte (HER2, ER, and/or PR). The laboratories identified the limits of detection and then mailed the slides for quantitative assessment.

Results.—

Each commercial immunostain demonstrated a characteristic analytic response curve, reflecting strong reproducibility among IHC laboratories using the same automation and reagents prepared per current Good Manufacturing Practices. However, when comparing different commercial vendors (using different reagents), the data reveal up to 100-fold differences in analytic sensitivity. For proficiency testing purposes, quantitative assessment using analytic response curves was superior to subjective interpretation of limits of detection.

Conclusions.—

Assessment of IHC laboratory performance by quantitative measurement of analytic response curves is a powerful, objective tool for identifying outlier IHC laboratories. It uniquely evaluates immunostain performance across a range of defined analyte concentrations.

Differential expression of various clones of estrogen receptor in cell block preparation of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Women treated for breast cancer are at increased risk of developing pulmonary nodules which could represent new primary lung carcinomas or metastatic breast carcinoma. The FNA biopsy is frequently the first diagnostic choice in determining the primary site of the tumor. Estrogen receptor (ER) positivity in diagnostic tissue is generally used to favor breast over lung primary. However, the recent studies have shown a wide range of ER antibody cross reactivity with lung adenocarcinoma. We studied the frequency of ER expression in cytology samples of lung adenocarcinoma using antibodies to three different ER clones.

METHODS

Cytology cell block preparations, including 22 lung FNAs and 19 malignant pleural effusions (PE) from 41 patients, with clinically documented primary lung adenocarcinomas were selected for this study. All cases were stained with monoclonal antibodies to ER clones 6F11 and 1D5. Twenty nine cases with remaining available material (15 FNA and 14 PE) were stained with a third antibody to ER clone SP1. The extent of ER nuclear staining was scored as 3+ (50%-100% of tumor cells), 2+ (11%-49%), and 1+ (≤10%).

RESULTS

Positivity for ER-6F11 clone was present in 4 of 22 lung FNAs (18.2%, 2+ staining). Two of the four 6F11 positive FNAs also co-expressed ER-1D5 (9.1%, 2+ staining). No immunoreactivity was observed for ER clones 6F11 and 1D5 in all 19 malignant PEs. In addition, none of the remaining 15 FNAs and 14 PEs showed immunoreactivity for ER-SP1 clone.

CONCLUSIONS

A small subset of pulmonary adenocarcinomas shows immunoreactivity for ER clones 6F11 and 1D5 in FNA samples (18.2% and 9.1%, respectively). The absence of immunoreactivity for ER-SP1 clone indicates higher specificity of this clone in non-breast tissue. The differential diagnostic value of all ER clones in malignant PEs appears to be secure. Larger studies are necessary to validate this observation.

Comparison of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Antibody Reagents Using Proficiency Testing Data

CONTEXT

- Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in breast cancer is the current standard of care and directly determines therapy. In 2010 the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) published guidelines for ER and PgR predictive testing, encompassing preanalytic, analytic, postanalytic factors; antibody validation; and proficiency testing.

OBJECTIVE

- To compare the performance of different antibody reagents for ER and PgR immunohistochemical analysis by using CAP proficiency testing data.

DESIGN

- The CAP PM2 survey uses tissue microarrays of ten 2-mm cores per slide. We analyzed survey data from 80 ER and 80 PgR cores by antibody clone from more than 1200 laboratories.

RESULTS

- Laboratories used the ER antibodies SP1 (72%), 6F11 (17%), 1D5 (3%), and the PgR antibodies 1E2 (61%), 16 (12%), PgR-636 (13%), PgR-1294 (8%) in 2015. While 63 of 80 ER cores (79%) were scored similarly using each of the 3 antibodies, there were significant differences for others, with SP1 yielding more positive interpretations. Four cores were scored as ER negative by more than half of the laboratories using 1D5 or 6F11, while SP1 produced positive results in more than 70% of laboratories using that antibody. Despite the greater variety of PgR antibody reagents and greater PgR tumor heterogeneity, 61 of 80 cores (76%) were scored similarly across the 4 PgR antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

- Accurate ER and PgR testing in breast cancer is crucial for appropriate treatment. The CAP proficiency testing data demonstrate differences in staining results by ER clone, with SP1 yielding more positive results.

The Importance of Epitope Density in Selecting a Sensitive Positive IHC Control

Clinical Immunohistochemistry (IHC) laboratories face unique challenges in performing accurate and reproducible immunostains. Among these challenges is the use of homemade controls derived from pathological discard samples. Such positive controls have an unknown number of analyte molecules per cell (epitope density). It is unclear how the lack of defined analyte concentrations affects performance of the control. To address this question, we prepared positive IHC controls ( IHControls) for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), or progesterone receptor (PR) with well-defined, homogeneous, and reproducible analyte concentrations. Using the IHControls, we examined the effect of analyte concentration on IHC control sensitivity. IHControls and conventional tissue controls were evaluated in a series of simulated primary antibody reagent degradation experiments. The data demonstrate that the ability of a positive IHC control to reveal reagent degradation depends on (1) the analyte concentration in the control and (2) where that concentration falls on the immunostain's analytic response curve. The most sensitive positive IHC controls have analyte concentrations within or close to the immunostain's concentration-dependent response range. Strongly staining positive controls having analyte concentrations on the analytic response curve plateau are less sensitive. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting positive IHC controls that are of intermediate (rather than strong) stain intensity.

Further evidence to support bimodality of oestrogen receptor expression in breast cancer

AIMS

Although oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers (BCs) do not respond to hormone therapy, the response of ER-positive BCs is reported to be variable, which may suggest a dose-dependent effect. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of ER expression in BCs at the protein (immunohistochemistry) and transcriptome (microarray-based gene expression) levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ER immunohistochemical (IHC) expression was assessed in a large series of BCs, including 3649 core biopsies and 1892 cases prepared as tissue microarrays (TMAs) stained with specific antibodies. ESR1 mRNA expression was assessed in the METABRIC study (1980 cases), by the use of the Linear Models for Microarray Data (limma) software, and the results were compared with protein levels. IHC data confirmed the bimodality of ER expression, with 92.2% and 89.2% of the cases showing completely negative (<1%) or highly positive (≥70%) expression on the cores and TMAs, respectively. Weakly positive cases (1-10%) and intermediately positive (11-69%) cases were infrequent (2.7% and 5.1%, and 1.6% and 9.2%, in cores and TMAs, respectively), and did not show survival difference from ER-negative tumours. When full-face sections of the corresponding excision specimens were immunostained, 47% of the ER-low/intermediate group were deemed to be ER-negative. Transcriptomic data not only showed a significant correlation between ESR1 mRNA and protein expression levels, but also confirmed the bimodality of ER expression at the mRNA level.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides further evidence that ER expression is bimodal, and that it is observed at both the mRNA and protein levels. The reported poor survival of BC patients with low ER expression in the early clinical trials may be related to the inclusion of ER-negative cases.

Analytic Response Curves of Clinical Breast Cancer IHC Tests

An important limitation in the field of immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the inability to correlate stain intensity with specific analyte concentrations. Clinical immunohistochemical tests are not described in terms of analytic response curves, namely, the analyte concentrations in a tissue sample at which an immunohistochemical stain (1) is first visible, (2) increases in proportion to the analyte concentration, and (3) ultimately approaches a maximum color intensity. Using a new immunostaining tool ( IHControls), we measured the analytic response curves of the major clinical immunohistochemical tests for human epidermal growth factor receptor type II (HER-2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). The IHControls comprise the analytes HER-2, ER, and PR at approximately log concentration intervals across the range of biological expression, from 100 to 1,000,000 molecules per test microbead. We stained IHControls of various concentrations using instruments, reagents, and protocols from three major IHC vendors. Stain intensity at each analyte concentration was measured, thereby generating an analytic response curve. We learned that for HER-2 and PR, there is significant variability in test results between clinical kits for samples with analyte concentrations of approximately 10⁴ molecules/microbead. We propose that the characterization of immunostains is an important step toward standardization.

Label-free detection of anti-estrogen receptor alpha and its binding with estrogen receptor peptide alpha by terahertz spectroscopy

Terahertz (THz) spectroscopic techniques were employed to study the hydration shell formation around anti-estrogen receptor alpha (AER-α) and to detect the binding reaction between AER-α and estrogen receptor peptide alpha (ERP-α).

The AF-1-deficient estrogen receptor ERα46 isoform is frequently expressed in human breast tumors

BACKGROUND

To date, all studies conducted on breast cancer diagnosis have focused on the expression of the full-length 66-kDa estrogen receptor alpha (ERα66). However, much less attention has been paid to a shorter 46-kDa isoform (ERα46), devoid of the N-terminal region containing the transactivation function AF-1. Here, we investigated the expression levels of ERα46 in breast tumors in relation to tumor grade and size, and examined the mechanism of its generation and its specificities of coregulatory binding and its functional activities.

METHODS

Using approaches combining immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and proteomics, antibodies allowing ERα46 detection were identified and the expression levels of ERα46 were quantified in 116 ERα-positive human breast tumors. ERα46 expression upon cellular stress was studied, and coregulator bindings, transcriptional, and proliferative response were determined to both ERα isoforms.

RESULTS

ERα46 was expressed in over 70% of breast tumors at variable levels which sometimes were more abundant than ERα66, especially in differentiated, lower-grade, and smaller-sized tumors. We also found that ERα46 can be generated via internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation in the context of endoplasmic reticulum stress. The binding affinities of both unliganded and fully-activated receptors towards co-regulator peptides revealed that the respective potencies of ERα46 and ERα66 differ significantly, contributing to the differential transcriptional activity of target genes to 17β estradiol (E2). Finally, increasing amounts of ERα46 decrease the proliferation rate of MCF7 tumor cells in response to E2.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, besides the full-length ERα66, the overlooked ERα46 isoform is also expressed in a majority of breast tumors. This finding highlights the importance of the choice of antibodies used for the diagnosis of breast cancer, which are able or not to detect the ERα46 isoform. In addition, since the function of both ERα isoforms differs, this work underlines the need to develop new technologies in order to discriminate ERα66 and ERα46 expression in breast cancer diagnosis which could have potential clinical relevance.

Propagation of oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen-responsive normal human breast cells in culture

Investigating the susceptibility of oestrogen receptor-positive (ER^pos) normal human breast epithelial cells (HBECs) for clinical purposes or basic research awaits a proficient cell-based assay. Here we set out to identify markers for isolating ER^pos cells and to expand what appear to be post-mitotic primary cells into exponentially growing cultures. We report a robust technique for isolating ER^pos HBECs from reduction mammoplasties by FACS using two cell surface markers, CD166 and CD117, and an intracellular cytokeratin marker, Ks20.8, for further tracking single cells in culture. We show that ER^pos HBECs are released from growth restraint by small molecule inhibitors of TGFβ signalling, and that growth is augmented further in response to oestrogen. Importantly, ER signalling is functionally active in ER^pos cells in extended culture. These findings open a new avenue of experimentation with normal ER^pos HBECs and provide a basis for understanding the evolution of human breast cancer.

Culturing normal primary breast cells that express the oestrogen receptor is difficult. Here, the authors isolate oestrogen receptor positive normal breast cells using the cell surface markers CD166 and CD117, and show that the cultures can be repeatedly passaged and retain oestrogen receptor protein expression.

Validation of EP1 antibody clone for estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry in breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) tumor's status is critical for breast cancer management. A new rabbit antibody clone, EP1, is now available for ER status determination. The objective was to validate the EP1 antibody clone for its use in breast cancer ER status determination in a clinical setting against the previous standard, SP1. EP1 clone was assessed in 130 consecutive cases, including 50 ER-negative (<1% ER expression), 13 ER-low-positive (1% to 9% ER expression), and 67 ER-positive (≥10% ER expression). Using EP1 versus SP1, positive agreement (sensibility) was 92.5% and negative agreement (specificity) was 100%, leading to an overall agreement of 95.4%. All discordant cases (n=6) were ER-low-positive. SP1 was remeasured in 13 ER-low-positive and in 11 ER-negative cases. Overall agreement between SP1 initial tumor status and reassessment was 70.8% in those negative and low-positive cases. In conclusion, EP1 antibody has been validated for use in breast cancer with a positive agreement ≥90% and a negative agreement ≥95%, as recommended. Also, overall agreement between EP1 and SP1 was as good as between the SP1 initial status and SP1 reassessment.