Instruments for evaluating medication use and prescribing in older adults

Medication Review in Turkish Older Adults at Community Pharmacy: A Pilot Study by Using Medication Appropriateness Index

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate medication review in older adults (≥65 years) at a community pharmacy by identifying the prevalence of potentiality inappropriate medication and calculating medication appropriateness index. Methods: This descriptive study was carried out in a community pharmacy for six months. The older adults (≥65 years) using one or more medications were included. During clinical pharmacist-led medication review; the medication appropriateness index was calculated for each medication of older adults. Potentially inappropriate medications were evaluated according to the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria®. Result: Among a hundred older adults, 46.0% were female. The median age of the patients was 75.5 (IQR, 68.0-78.8). The median number of medications was 9.0 (7.0-10.0). Polypharmacy has been detected in 97.0% of the patients. At least one potentially inappropriate medication was detected in 63.0% of them. The median score of medication appropriateness index score was 53.0 (IQR: 38.6-67.9). Conclusion: To best our knowledge, this is the first study of clinical pharmacist-led medication review by calculating the medication appropriateness index carried out at a community pharmacy in Turkey. There was a high rate of potentially inappropriate medication with a higher score of medication appropriateness in older adults. This study highlights the importance of medication review led by the clinical pharmacist at community pharmacy to optimize medication usage in older adults.

Use of antithrombotics at the end of life: an in-depth chart review study

Background

Antithrombotics are frequently prescribed for patients with a limited life expectancy. In the last phase of life, when treatment is primarily focused on optimizing patients’ quality of life, the use of antithrombotics should be reconsidered.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective review of 180 medical records of patients who had died of a malignant or non-malignant disease, at home, in a hospice or in a hospital, in the Netherlands. All medication prescriptions and clinical notes of patients using antithrombotics in the last three months of life were reviewed manually. We subsequently developed case vignettes based on a purposive sample, with variation in setting, age, gender, type of medication, and underlying disease.

Results

In total 60% (n=108) of patients had used antithrombotics in the last three months of life. Of all patients using antithrombotics 33.3 % died at home, 21.3 % in a hospice and 45.4 % in a hospital. In total, 157 antithrombotic prescriptions were registered; 30 prescriptions of vitamin K antagonists, 60 of heparins, and 66 of platelet aggregation inhibitors. Of 51 patients using heparins, 32 only received a prophylactic dose. In 75.9 % of patients antithrombotics were continued until the last week before death. Case vignettes suggest that inability to swallow, bleeding complications or the dying phase were important factors in making decisions about the use of antithrombotics.

Conclusions

Antithrombotics in patients with a life limiting disease are often continued until shortly before death. Clinical guidance may support physicians to reconsider (dis)continuation of antithrombotics and discuss this with the patient.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00786-3.

Development and evaluation of an algorithm-based tool for Medication Management in nursing homes: the AMBER study protocol

BACKGROUND

Residents of nursing homes are susceptible to risks from medication. Medication Reviews (MR) can increase clinical outcomes and the quality of medication therapy. Limited resources and barriers between healthcare practitioners are potential obstructions to performing MR in nursing homes. Focusing on frequent and relevant problems can support pharmacists in the provision of pharmaceutical care services. This study aims to develop and evaluate an algorithm-based tool that facilitates the provision of Medication Management in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is subdivided into three phases. In phase I, semistructured interviews with healthcare practitioners and patients will be performed, and a mixed methods approach will be chosen. Qualitative content analysis and the rating of the aspects concerning the frequency and relevance of problems in the medication process in nursing homes will be performed. In phase II, a systematic review of the current literature on problems and interventions will be conducted. The findings will be narratively presented. The results of both phases will be combined to develop an algorithm for MRs. For further refinement of the aspects detected, a Delphi survey will be conducted. In conclusion, a tool for clinical practice will be created. In phase III, the tool will be tested on MRs in nursing homes. In addition, effectiveness, acceptance, feasibility and reproducibility will be assessed. The primary outcome of phase III will be the reduction of drug-related problems (DRPs), which will be detected using the tool. The secondary outcomes will be the proportion of DRPs, the acceptance of pharmaceutical recommendations and the expenditure of time using the tool and inter-rater reliability.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study intervention is approved by the local Ethics Committee. The findings of the study will be presented at national and international scientific conferences and will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00010995.

Validation of the MedUseQ: A Self-Administered Screener for Older Adults to Assess Medication Use Problems

Background:

Older adults taking multiple prescription and nonprescription drugs are at risk for medication use problems, yet there are few brief, self-administered screening tools designed specifically for them.

Objective:

The study objective was to develop and validate a patient-centered screener for community-dwelling older adults.

Methods:

In phase 1, a convenience sample of 57 stakeholders (older adults, pharmacists, nurses, and physicians) participated in concept mapping, using Concept System® Global MAXTM, to identify items for a questionnaire. In phase 2, a 40-item questionnaire was tested with a convenience sample of 377 adults and a 24-item version was tested with 306 older adults, aged 55 and older, using Rasch methodology. In phase 3, stakeholder focus groups provided feedback on the format of questionnaire materials and recommended strategies for addressing problems.

Results:

The concept map contained 72 statements organized into 6 conceptual clusters or domains. The 24-item screener was unidimensional. Cronbach's alpha was .87, person reliability was acceptable (.74), and item reliability was high (.96).

Conclusion:

The MedUseQ is a validated, patient-centered tool targeting older adults that can be used to assess a wide range of medication use problems in clinical and community settings and to identify areas for education, intervention, or further assessment.

Polypharmacy-an Upward Trend with Unpredictable Effects

BACKGROUND

Guideline-oriented treatments can lead to polypharmacy, i.e., the simultaneous long-term use of multiple drugs. Polypharmacy mainly affects elderly patients. The goal of this review is to survey the current scientific evidence about polypharmacy, focusing on clinical endpoints, and to point out implications for medical practice and research.

METHODS

This selective literature review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed employing the terms "polypharmacy AND general practice." Selected references were considered as well.

RESULTS

In Germany, polypharmacy currently affects approximately 42% of persons over age 65, with an ongoing upward trend. 20-25% of these patients receive potentially inappropriate drugs. Approximately 86% of the daily doses of drugs taken by persons over age 65 are prescribed by general practitioners. There is inconsistent evidence on the question whether polypharmacy affects clinical endpoints such as mortality. It cannot be determined with certainty whether polypharmacy itself, or the underlying multimorbidity, is the reason for worse clinical outcomes. Lists, instruments, and guidelines such as PRISCUS (a list of potentially inappropriate drugs for elderly patients), FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged), MAI (the Medication Appropriateness Index), and the Hausärztliche Leitlinie Multimedikation (a German-language guideline on polypharmacy for general practitioners) can help physicians take care of patients who are taking multiple drugs. It has not yet been proven, however, that their use has any effect on clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The decision whether to keep giving a drug or to discontinue it must always be made individually on the basis of current treatment goals; drug lists and a pertinent general practitioners' guideline can be useful aids in decision-making. Efforts to pay more attention to multimorbidity and polypharmacy in future studies and guidelines are deserving of support.

Assessing appropriateness of drug therapy in older persons: Development and application of a medication assessment tool for long-term management of atrial fibrillation

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in older persons and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Assessing appropriateness of drug therapy in AF may be facilitated by application of medication assessment tools (MATs).

Objective:

To develop, psychometrically evaluate and apply an innovative MAT for the long-term management of AF with particular relevance to older persons.

Methods:

Key recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the long-term management of AF were selected and review criteria defining appropriate drug therapy were constructed as a ‘qualifying statement’ followed by a ‘standard’. The developed MAT was given the designation MAT-AF. An application guide was compiled where justifications for non-adherence were specified. Content validity was tested by an expert group using a three-round Delphi process. Inter- and intra-observer reliability testing was conducted with agreement expressed by Cohen’s kappa and application time measured to assess feasibility. MAT-AF was applied to 150 patients with a diagnosis of AF admitted to a rehabilitation hospital.

Results:

MAT-AF consists of 15 criteria sectioned into antithrombotic, rate control and rhythm control therapy. Content validity was demonstrated for all criteria. Reliability was confirmed with kappa values of 0.84 and 0.91 for inter- and intra-observer agreements. Mean application time for the two observers was 3.9 and 2.4 minutes, which decreased significantly in the second application conducted after a four-week interval (p<0.001). Overall adherence to applicable criteria was 59.8%. Non-adherence was evident for prescription of anticoagulation in patients with a CHA₂DS₂VASc score ≥1 (29.5%). Monitoring of laboratory parameters for digoxin was suboptimal. Ophthalmic and pulmonary monitoring and patient counselling regarding amiodarone therapy could not be assessed since relevant records were not readily available.

Conclusion:

MAT-AF application highlighted key aspects which need to be addressed to improve patient care.

Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults With Cancer During Unplanned Hospitalizations: An Opportunity in Disguise

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment (GA) is an important tool for management of older cancer patients; however, GA research has been performed primarily in the outpatient setting. The primary objective of this study was to determine feasibility of GA during an unplanned hospital stay. Secondary objectives were to describe deficits found with GA, to assess whether clinicians recognized and addressed deficits, and to determine 30-day readmission rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was designed as an extension of an existing registry, "Carolina Senior: Registry for Older Patients." Inclusion criteria were age 70 and older and biopsy-proven solid tumor, myeloma, or lymphoma. Patients had to complete the GA within 7 days of nonelective admission to University of North Carolina Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were approached, and 90 (63%) consented to participation. All sections of GA had at least an 83% completion rate. Overall, 53% of patients reported problems with physical function, 63% had deficits in instrumental activities of daily living, 34% reported falls, 12% reported depression, 31% had ≥10% weight loss, and 12% had abnormalities in cognition. Physician documentation of each deficit ranged from 20% to 46%. Rates of referrals to allied health professionals were not significantly different between patients with and without deficits. The 30-day readmission rate was 29%.

CONCLUSION

GA was feasible in this population. Hospitalized older cancer patients have high levels of functional and psychosocial deficits; however, clinician recognition and management of deficits were poor. The use of GA instruments to guide referrals to appropriate services is a way to potentially improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Geriatric assessment (GA) is an important tool in the management of older cancer patients; however, its primary clinical use has been in the outpatient setting. During an unplanned hospitalization, patients are extremely frail and are most likely to benefit from GA. This study demonstrates that hospitalized older adults with cancer have high levels of functional deficits on GA. These deficits are under-recognized and poorly managed by hospital-based clinicians in a tertiary care setting. Incorporation of GA measures during a hospital stay is a way to improve outcomes in this population.