Efficacy and cost analysis of ibutilide

Managing arrhythmias in the intensive care unit

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias, the most common of which can be subdivided into tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. These arrhythmias may be the primary reason for ICU admission or may occur in the critically ill patient. This article addresses the occurrence of arrhythmias in the critically ill patient, and discusses their pathophysiology, implications, recognition, and management.

Cost effectiveness of antiarrhythmic medications in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a supraventricular tachycardia disorder, is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting 1-2 % of the general population. Prevalence is highly related to age, with every fourth individual older than 40 years old developing AF during his lifetime. Due to an aging population, the prevalence of AF is estimated to at least double within the next 50 years. This article presents AF-related cost-of-illness studies and reviews 19 cost-effectiveness studies and six cost studies published roughly over the past decade, which have compared different antiarrhythmic medications for AF. A systematic literature search for studies published between June 2000 and December 2011 was conducted in PubMed using the combination of keywords ((atrial fibrillation OR atrial flutter) AND cost). Current cost-effectiveness analyses of dronedarone and the pill-in-the-pocket strategy are subject to substantial uncertainties with regard to clinical benefit. Comparing rate control with rhythm control, a cost-effectiveness advantage for rate control was shown in several but not all studies. Within antiarrhythmic drug treatments, magnesium added onto ibutilide was shown to be more cost effective than ibutilide alone. Comparing chemical and electrical cardioversion, the latter was recommended as more cost effective from the healthcare system perspective in all reviewed studies but one. Catheter ablation appeared more cost effective than antiarrhythmic drugs in the medium to long run after 3.2-63.9 years. Admissions to hospital, inpatient care and interventional procedures as well as mortality benefit are key drivers for the cost effectiveness of AF medications. No clear cost-effectiveness advantage emerged for one specific antiarrhythmic drug from the studies that compared antiarrhythmic agents. Rate control as well as catheter ablation appear more cost effective than rhythm control in the treatment of AF. Rate control treatment also seems more cost effective than electrical cardioversion in AF patients.

Female preponderance in ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes

OBJECTIVE

Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent used for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias, has a potential to cause QT-interval prolongation and torsade de pointes. Purpose of this study was to determine whether women are more prone to develop ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes.

METHODS

All clinical trials, cases, case series, and related articles in English-language in addition to 51 patients from our institution on the subject were examined.

RESULTS

In a database derived from 23 reports in literature and from our institution, 1720 patients received ibutilide for cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. Only in 87% (n=1492) patients, data were reported whether or not ibutilide caused torsade de pointes. The overall incidence of torsade de pointes was 3.9% (n=58) patients. Data on sex distribution of ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes was available in 73% (n=1096) patients. Torsade de pointes developed in 17 (5.6%) of 304 women and 24 (3%) of 792 men (P=0.05). It occurred during or within 45 min after completion of the infusion of ibutilide. Treatment instituted was with intravenous magnesium sulfate alone in 14% (n=8) patients, magnesium sulfate plus lidocaine in 5% (n=3) patients, magnesium sulfate with electrical cardioversion in 17% (n=10) patients, electrical cardioversion alone in 19% (n=11) patients, and precordial thump in 3% (n=2) patients. In 41% (n=24) of patients who developed torsade de pointes, it resolved without treatment. There were no reported deaths secondary to torsade de pointes associated with ibutilide infusion.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes is higher in women than in men. Greater caution must be observed while using ibutilide in women.

Cost effectiveness of ibutilide with prophylactic magnesium in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

In the Treatment with Ibutilide and Magnesium Evaluation (TIME) study, a retrospective multicentre cohort trial, prophylactic magnesium was found to improve the antiarrhythmic efficacy of ibutilide as demonstrated by an increase in the rate of successful chemical conversion and reduction in the need for direct current cardioversion (DCC).

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this piggyback cost-effectiveness analysis of the TIME study was to compare the cost per successful conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) for ibutilide in the presence and absence of magnesium prophylaxis. A secondary objective was to determine whether specific factors predict costs in the conversion of AF.

METHOD

The study was conducted from the US hospital-payer perspective. Direct medical costs (USD, 2002 values) including drugs, intravenous admixture and administration, DCC, electrocardiographs and physicians' fees were obtained directly from the provider. Nonparametric bootstrapping was conducted to calculate confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted varying efficacy, and drug, hospital and physician costs. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine whether specific baseline factors were predictors of total cost.

RESULTS

Total costs per patient were lower in the ibutilide plus magnesium group compared with ibutilide alone (USD1075 vs USD1201); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). Patients receiving ibutilide plus magnesium had lower DCC costs compared with those receiving ibutilide alone (USD261 vs USD399; p = 0.036), but higher magnesium-associated costs (USD0.50 vs USD0; p < 0.001). Bootstrapping revealed that the ibutilide plus magnesium strategy would result in lower costs and greater efficacy 93.4% of the time. These results remained robust to changes in both cost and efficacy. No baseline factors were found to be independent predictors of total costs.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that adding prophylactic magnesium to ibutilide may be cost effective, from a US hospital-payer perspective, for the acute conversion of patients in AF or flutter compared with ibutilide alone.

Effectiveness and costs of chemical versus electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and has an important impact on costs of medical assistance. Traditional interventions to convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm are antiarrhythmic drugs and external electrical cardioversion. However, the best option for starting the cardioversion is not well established.

METHODS

In a multicentre randomised trial of 139 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation lasting less than 6 months, we compared the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness ratio of initial treatment with chemical or electrical cardioversion. Subjects who did not achieve sinus rhythm with chemical cardioversion were considered to undergo electrical cardioversion and vice-versa.

RESULTS

The efficacy of the initial attempt for cardioversion was similar with chemical or electrical cardioversion (74 vs. 73%, P=0.95). However, the strategy of starting with antiarrhythmic drugs was more effective than with electrical procedure (96 vs. 84%, P=0.0016). Initiating with chemical cardioversion was also less expensive than with electrical cardioversion (1240 US dollars vs. 1917 US dollars ; P=0.002). Life-threatening complications occurred only during chemical cardioversion (5%), all of them in patients with structural heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation of less than 6 months, initial chemical or electrical cardioversion appear to be similar but the strategy of starting the cardioversion with antiarrhythmic drugs is more effective and less expensive than starting with the electrical procedure. Patients with structural heart disease undergoing chemical cardioversion seem to be more susceptible to severe complications.

Ibutilide versus amiodarone in atrial fibrillation: a double-blinded, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

Ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, has been shown to convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm more rapidly than procainamide or sotalol. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty adults with an onset of atrial fibrillation within 3 hrs after admission.

INTERVENTIONS

Before the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, a 24-hr Holter electrocardiograph was attached. Patients in the ibutilide group received ibutilide 0.008 mg/kg body weight over 10 mins; treatment was repeated if atrial fibrillation or flutter persisted. If sinus rhythm was not achieved within 4 hrs, amiodarone 5 mg/kg was administered over 30 mins, followed by amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hrs. Patients in the amiodarone group received amiodarone 5 mg/kg over 30 mins, followed by amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hrs if atrial fibrillation or flutter continued.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Within the first 4 hrs, atrial fibrillation was converted in nine of 20 patients (45%) in group ibutilide and in ten of 20 patients (50%) in group amiodarone (not significant). Mean time for conversion overall was 385 mins in group ibutilide and 495 mins in group amiodarone (not significant). In group amiodarone, the protocol was discontinued in two patients because of severe arterial hypotension. Atrial fibrillation recurred in 11 of 20 patients (55%) in group ibutilide and in seven of 20 patients (35%) in group amiodarone (not significant). Ventricular arrhythmia did not occur during the first 24 hrs of the protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibutilide has no significant advantage over amiodarone for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in either time to conversion or conversion overall, but severe hypotension was not seen with ibutilide.

Pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of available evidence

This report reviews the efficacy of currently available antiarrhythmic agents for conversion of atrial fibrilation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm (NSR). A systematic search of literature in the English language was done on computerized databases, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents, in reference lists, by manual searching, and in contact with expert informants. Published studies involving humans that described the use of antiarrhythmic therapy for conversion of AF to NSR were considered and only studies that examined the use of agents currently available in the United States were included. Studies exclusively describing antiarrhythmic therapy for conversion of postsurgical AF were excluded. The methodology and results of each trial were assessed and attempts were made to acquire additional information from investigators when needed. Assessment of methodological quality was incorporated into a levels-of-evidence scheme. Eighty-eight trials were included, of which 34 (39%) included a placebo group (level I data). We found in recent-onset AF of less than 7 days, intravenous (i.v.) procainamide, high-dose i.v. or high-dose combination i.v. and oral amiodarone, oral quinidine, oral flecainide, oral propafenone, and high-dose oral amiodarone are more effective than placebo for converting AF to NSR. In recent-onset AF of less than 90 days, i.v. ibutilide is more effective than placebo and i.v. procainamide. In chronic AF, oral dofetilide converts AF to NSR within 72 hours, and oral propafenone and amiodarone are effective after 30 days of therapy. We conclude than for conversion of recent-onset AF of less than 7 days, procainamide may be considered a preferred i.v. agent and propafenone a preferred oral agent. For conversion of recent-onset AF of longer duration (less than 90 days), i.v. ibutilide may be considered a preferred agent. For patients with chronic AF and left ventricular dysfunction, direct current cardioversion is the preferred conversion method. Larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials with clinically important endpoints in specific populations of AF patients are needed.

Atrial Fibrillation

The conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm should be attempted in patients who present with this condition, as long as the cure is not worse than the disease itself. In young patients with normal hearts, AF has a small impact on morbidity and mortality. The primary indication for conversion in this population is often symptoms. In contrast, in patients with diseased hearts or who are older than 65 years, maintaining sinus rhythm may have a favorable impact on stroke risk, ventricular function, and symptoms. In the absence of normal sinus rhythm, these patients should receive anticoagulants. Rate control is the preferred first-line strategy for asymptomatic patients and patients presenting with a history of long-standing, persistent AF, making conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm unlikely. Rate control may be used in patients who develop AF during an acute systemic illness, which will likely terminate with time or therapy. Conversion to sinus rhythm should be considered in patients with a first episode of AF, as unconverted AF tends to perpetuate itself. Conversion can be attempted if the duration of AF is less than 48 hours or if the patient has received anticoagulants when the duration is not known. Other indications for cardioversion are prolonged episodes in patients with otherwise infrequent episodes of paroxysmal AF, and in patients who refuse to take anticoagulants or in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated. After the patient is converted to sinus rhythm, the decision to initiate chronic drug therapy should be based on the presence of other cardiac and medical diseases that increase the risk of recurrence and serious symptoms in case of recurrence (such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or mitral stenosis). It is acceptable to manage patients with new-onset AF and normal cardiac function with cardioversion alone and not initiate chronic antiarrhythmic therapy afterwards. However, in patients with abnormal hearts (coronary artery disease, hypertensive or mitral valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathy) AF is likely to recur, and such patients should be placed on antiarrhythmic medication.