The efficacy of extended-interval dosing of omeprazole in keeping gastroesophageal reflux disease patients symptom free

WITHDRAWN: Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - reflux of stomach contents +/- bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux - is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982-2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis: For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs.For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo.For ENRD patients: Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this review support the long-term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI-intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.

H. pylori eradication prevents the progression of gastric intestinal metaplasia in reflux esophagitis patients using long-term esomeprazole

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether Helicobacter pylori eradication limits the progression of precancerous changes, manifested as intestinal metaplasia (IM), in patients with reflux esophagitis using long-term esomeprazole.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-five reflux esophagitis patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to (i) the H. pylori-positive eradication group receiving 1-week triple therapy (n=105); (ii) H. pylori-positive non-eradication controls (n=105); and (iii) H. pylori-negative controls (n=115). All the patients received continuous esomeprazole until sustained symptomatic response, and when possible, shifted to on-demand therapy (ODT) thereafter. Serial gastroscopy was scheduled on enrollment and at the end of the first and second years to assess the prevalence and progression or regression of gastric atrophy (AT) and IM.

RESULTS

There were 93 patients in the H. pylori-eradication group, 83 in the non-eradication controls, and 100 in the negative controls to complete the study. The negative controls had no progression of AT and IM during follow-up. For the H. pylori-positive eradication group, there was significant regression of AT and IM during follow-up (P<0.05). In the H. pylori-positive non-treated controls, the prevalence rates of AT and IM were significantly greater on the second year than on enrollment (P<0.05). During the second-year follow-up, the patients in the eradication group achieved more regression and less development of AT and IM than did the non-eradication controls (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients using long-term esomeprazole for reflux esophagitis, screening for and eradicating H. pylori infection are necessary in order to limit the progression or cause the regression of gastric precancerous changes.

Omeprazole: Extended-Interval Dosing (Alternate-Day Dosing)

Off-Label Drug Uses

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label DrugFacts, a quarterly publication available from Wolters Kluwer Health. Off-Label DrugFacts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific FDA-unapproved drug uses. This new guide to the literature will enable the health care professional/clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and to determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. The most relevant data are provided in tabular form, so the reader can easily identify the scope of information available. A summary of the data—including background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations—precedes each table of published studies. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information prior to patient care decisions. Direct questions or comments regarding “Off-Label Drug Uses” to hospitalpharmacy@drugfacts.com .

Medical treatments for the maintenance therapy of reflux oesophagitis and endoscopic negative reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - reflux of stomach contents +/- bile into the oesophagus causing symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux - is a common relapsing and remitting disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Patients with GORD may have oesophagitis (inflammation of the oesophagus) or a normal endoscopy (endoscopy negative reflux disease or ENRD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of continuous maintenance therapy in adults with GORD (both ENRD and healed oesophagitis).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003), CINAHL (1982-2003), and the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies comparing PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo in adults with reflux oesophagitis and ENRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author extracted data from included trials and a second author carried out an unblinded check. Two authors independently assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Maintenance of patients with healed oesophagitis: For a healing dose of PPI (generally the standard dose given by the manufacturer) versus placebo, the relative risk (RR) for oesophagitis relapse was 0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36); versus H2RAs the RR was 0.36 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) and versus maintenance PPIs the RR was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). However overall adverse effects were also more common and headaches were more common when comparing healing PPIs to H2RAs. For a maintenance dose of PPI (half of the standard dose) versus placebo, the RR for oesophagitis relapse was 0.46 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and versus H2RAs the RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.69). Overall adverse effects were more common.H2RAs were of marginal help but beneficial for symptomatic relief. Prokinetics and sucralfate were also more effective than placebo. For ENRD patients: Limited data with one RCT showed benefit for omeprazole 10 mg once daily over placebo (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.53).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this review support the long-term treatment of oesophagitis to prevent relapse, both endoscopically and symptomatically. Healing doses of PPIs are more effective than all other therapies, although there is an increase in overall adverse effects compared to placebo, and headache occurrence compared to H2RAs. H2RAs prevent relapse more effectively than placebo, demonstrating a role for PPI-intolerant patients. Prokinetics and sucralfate both show benefit over placebo, but the former is no longer licenced. There is only limited data for ENRD.

Systematic review: Is there excessive use of proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors are often recommended for continuous use in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but this may not be necessary in all patients.

AIM

To ascertain the level of evidence for alternative strategies for proton-pump inhibitor treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

We searched for observational or interventional studies examining alternatives to continuous proton-pump inhibitor treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

Non-randomized studies suggest that some patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, including some with erosive oesophagitis, may be adequately maintained on proton-pump inhibitor therapy given less frequently than once daily. However, the results may not be generalizable. Four high quality randomized-controlled trials compared 'on-demand' proton-pump inhibitor and placebo treatment in endoscopy-negative reflux disease; all found this effective for most patients. One high quality randomized-controlled trial found intermittent courses of a proton-pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist in erosive oesophagitis or endoscopy-negative reflux disease adequate for almost half of the patients studied. Up to 80% of patients on continuous high-dose proton-pump inhibitor treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be 'stepped down' to less intensive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

On-demand proton-pump inhibitor treatment may be appropriate in endoscopy-negative reflux disease. In gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, patients taking more than once daily or high-dose proton-pump inhibitor treatment, a step down to once daily or standard dose therapy should be attempted.

Intermittent and on-demand use of proton pump inhibitors in the management of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

The epidemic of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in industrialized nations is currently spreading to less-developed ones, with more than half of the patients having symptomatic or mild erosive GERD. The long-term management of GERD has been dominated by daily maintenance treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) to prevent relapse. It is common, however, for many patients with mild disease and infrequent symptom relapses to use a PPI only when symptoms demand. Patients with symptomatic or mild erosive GERD are therefore ideal for on-demand or intermittent treatment. The efficacy of such a strategy of intermittent treatment, or treatment of symptoms on demand, has recently been evaluated in four randomized controlled studies. These trials demonstrate that such therapeutic strategies reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, and are cost effective. In clinical practice, the author has found these treatment strategies suitable for approximately 60% of newly diagnosed patients with GERD for the long-term management of symptomatic GERD of mild or moderate severity.

Daily low-dose versus alternate day full-dose lansoprazole in the maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

For the long term maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis several strategies have been proposed with the aim of reducing the daily dosage or the frequency of drug administration. However, the available clinical studies are scarce and are often not controlled or conducted on a reduced number of cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two doses of lansoprazole (15 mg once daily and 30 mg on alternate days) in maintaining endoscopic healing and symptom relief over a 6-month period.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-seven patients with Savary-Miller grades I-III reflux esophagitis healed after an 8-wk treatment with lansoprazole (30 mg daily) were divided into two main groups for a 6-month maintenance therapy period: lansoprazole, 15 mg once daily (group 15qd) and lansoprazole, 30 mg on alternate days (group 30qod). These two main groups were further subdivided according to the time of drug administration; morning (15qdm and 30qodm) and evening (15qde and 30qode). Each patient underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy before entry into the study, after 8 wk of acute therapy, and after 6 months of maintenance therapy; 24-h esophageal-gastric pH monitoring was performed at baseline and during the last week of maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

At the end of the maintenance period the recurrence of esophagitis was observed in 12.1% of group 15qd patients and in 19.0% of group 30qod patients, without significant differences between the two groups. The frequency of patients without reflux symptoms after the 6-month period was the same for both groups; however, a significant increase of heartburn was observed in group 30qod patients (from 12.1% to 28.6%, p = 0.007). The time of drug administration (morning and evening) had no influence on the outcome of treatment. Both regimens significantly reduced esophageal acid exposure time and increased the median 24-h gastric pH.

CONCLUSIONS

Both long term lansoprazole regimens are equally effective in preventing the recurrence of esophagitis, independent of the modality of drug administration. The daily administration seems to have a better effect on the prevention of symptom recurrence.

Alternate-day dosing of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for cholesterol reduction

OBJECTIVE

Assess efficacy, safety, and cost of alternate-day dosing with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (HRIs).

DATA

International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE (English-language clinical trials, 1966-April 2000) were searched.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Established efficacy of HRIs is based on daily administration. Many patients who could benefit from these agents are unable to afford them; therefore, alternate-day dosing may be a solution for reducing expense without decreasing therapy benefits. Studies addressing alternate-day HRI therapy are evaluated to determine the usefulness of this option for cholesterol reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited studies imply a trend toward benefit with alternate-day HRI therapy, large, controlled, randomized trials are needed before making this a standard recommendation.