Role of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

Renal effects of contrast media in diabetic patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional coronary angiography

BACKGROUND

The use of safe iodinated contrast media (CM) to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important consideration among renally impaired diabetic patients during coronary angiography.

HYPOTHESIS

Diabetic patients with normal or mild renal dysfunction are less likely to receive renal protective measures during angiography, yet they may also be at risk for CIN. We compared the renal effects of iopamidol and iodixanol in diabetic patients who were referred for angiography.

METHODS

Diabetic patients (N=122) with a serum creatinine (SCr) level of < or = 2 mg/dl were double-blind randomized to receive nonionic CM: iopamidol-370 (low osmolar, monomeric) or iodixanol-320 (iso-osmolar, dimeric). Renal stability was evaluated at baseline and at Days 1, 3, and 7 post-angiography. The primary endpoint was a > or = 25% increase in SCr.

RESULTS

Seventeen (10 iopamidol, 7 iodixanol; P=NS) patients had an increase in SCr > or = 25% over baseline. Over all days, analysis revealed nonsignificant differences in the incidence of CIN between the two study groups regardless of how CIN was defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patients with normal or mild renal dysfunction are at risk for CIN. No significant difference in renal response was observed for these CM in this at-risk population.

N-acetylcysteine for prevention of radiographic contrast material-induced nephropathy: is the intravenous route best?

Use of oral N-acetylcysteine for preventing radiographic contrast material-induced nephropathy (RCIN) has become widespread, despite conflicting results from clinical trials and meta-analyses. The variability in study results may reflect differences in baseline risks in study patients, hydration regimens, choice of contrast agent, definition of RCIN, and the oral dosage formulation of N-acetylcysteine used. Injectable N-acetylcysteine recently has become available in the United States. Although oral N-acetylcysteine regimens are typically administered during a 48-hour period, more rapid intravenous administration could offer an important advantage for urgent procedures such as coronary angiography. However, the three published studies in which intravenous N-acetylcysteine protocols were used have produced divergent results, likely because of substantially different dosage regimens. With few intravenous studies available, clinicians may look to more broadly studied oral regimens to estimate equivalent intravenous dosages. In the oral studies, however, a wide range of formulations were used, and the bioavailability of each product was uncertain. In addition, the intravenous route circumvents first-pass metabolism, resulting in less glutathione production, perhaps compromising the antioxidant effects of N-acetylcysteine administration. Overall, little evidence exists that any studied N-acetylcysteine protocol improves clinical outcomes in terms of reducing length of hospital stay, need for dialysis, or mortality. Furthermore, N-acetylcysteine may directly affect serum creatinine level, which all clinical trials to date have used as a primary outcome measure. If oral or intravenous N-acetylcysteine is used with the intention of preventing RCIN, more established preventive measures should not be overlooked, including adequate hydration with isotonic saline, avoidance of potentially nephrotoxic drugs, and use of iso-osmolar radiographic contrast media.

Evidence-based Practice for the Use of N-acetylcysteine

The use of N-acetylcysteine has increased in the prevention of radiographic contrast induced nephrotoxicity. Many nurses need to be aware of the proper administration and action of this prophylactic agent. This article discusses the research behind the use of N-acetylcysteine and the protocol for administration to prevent radiographic contrast-induced nephrotoxicity.

Prevention and nondialytic treatment of acute renal failure

Based on the progress made during the last few years in understanding the pathophysiology of acute renal failure, a plethora of therapeutic drug and nondrug interventions have been developed and tested in animal and human forms of this disease. The first part of this article focuses on the role of volume expansion and vasopressors in the prevention and treatment of acute renal failure in the critically ill. From all prophylactic measures that have been proposed, volume expansion, or at least correction of volume depletion, remains the most efficient and most evidence-based intervention in these patients. Norepinephrine is, out of all the vasopressors, probably the most appropriate to use in cases of hypotension, provided circulating volume is adequate. In hypotensive septic patients, vasopressin has been shown to be useful. Direct renal vasodilating substances, the most popular still being low-dose dopamine, have never been proved to be useful in carefully performed prospective trials. Moreover dopamine especially is associated with a number of side effects and complications. From the agents acting on tubular factors, the diuretic mannitol and loop diuretics are the most prescribed. Only in specific situations such as rhabdomyolysis and kidney transplant surgery has it been shown that mannitol was able to prevent acute renal failure. The loop diuretics are able, after establishing adequate circulating volume, to promote diuresis in some forms of oliguric acute renal failure; however, some recent papers have shown that the administration of loop diuretics may actually be associated with increased mortality and delayed recovery of renal function. The last few years have seen a number of trials with acetylcysteine in the prevention of mainly radiocontrast nephropathy. Although the results are still conflicting, the majority indicates that acetylcysteine, when applied together with adequate volume expansion, may be a useful drug to incorporate in the standard treatment procedures in patients at risk for acute renal failure. Interventions to stimulate the recovery process of the damaged kidney with growth factors, although theoretically sound, have thus far not led to successful results.

Fenoldopam andN-acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Radiographic Contrast Material-Induced Nephropathy: A Review

Radiographic contrast material-induced nephropathy (RCIN) is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired renal insufficiency and has been associated with an increase in patient mortality. Many strategies to prevent RCIN have been explored unsuccessfully. The standard of care remains hydration with 0.45% sodium chloride before and after administration of contrast material. Recently, N-acetylcysteine and fenoldopam have been studied to determine their efficacy in preventing RCIN. Of seven prospective studies using various dosing regimens of N-acetylcysteine, four revealed beneficial results. Although some discrepancies exist, the data strongly suggest that N-acetylcysteine has a role in patients at risk for the development of RCIN. The data for fenoldopam are more limited, with only one retrospective study showing benefit. Additional prospective data are required to determine if fenoldopam has a role in the prevention of RCIN.

Acetylcysteine: Prevention of Contrast Media Nephropathy

Off-Label Drug Uses

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label DrugFacts, a quarterly publication available from Facts and Comparisons. Off-Label DrugFacts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific FDA-unapproved drug uses. This new guide to the literature will enable the health care professional/clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and to determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. The most relevant data are provided in tabular form so that the reader can easily identify the scope of information available. A summary of the data-including, background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations-precedes each table of published studies. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information prior to patient care decisions. Direct questions or comments on “Off-Label Drug Uses” to hospitalpharmacy@drugfacts.com .