Acute onset of pancreatitis with concomitant use of tenofovir and didanosine

Antiretroviral drugs and acute pancreatitis in HIV/AIDS patients: is there any association? A literature review

In HIV-seropositive individuals, the incidence of acute pancreatitis may achieve 40% per year, higher than the 2% found in the general population. Since 1996, when combined antiretroviral therapy, known as HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy), was introduced, a broad spectrum of harmful factors to the pancreas, such as opportunistic infections and drugs used for chemoprophylaxis, dropped considerably. Nucleotide analogues and metabolic abnormalities, hepatic steatosis and lactic acidosis have emerged as new conditions that can affect the pancreas. To evaluate the role of antiretroviral drugs to treat HIV/AIDS in a scenario of high incidence of acute pancreatitis in this population, a systematic review was performed, including original articles, case reports and case series studies, whose targets were HIV-seropositive patients that developed acute pancreatitis after exposure to any antiretroviral drugs. This association was confirmed after exclusion of other possible etiologies and/or a recurrent episode of acute pancreatitis after re-exposure to the suspected drug. Zidovudine, efavirenz, and protease inhibitors are thought to lead to acute pancreatitis secondary to hyperlipidemia. Nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, despite being powerful inhibitors of viral replication, induce a wide spectrum of side effects, including myelotoxicity and acute pancreatitis. Didanosine, zalcitabine and stavudine have been reported as causes of acute and chronic pancreatitis. They pose a high risk with cumulative doses. Didanosine with hydroxyurea, alcohol or pentamidine are additional risk factors, leading to lethal pancreatitis, which is not a frequent event. In addition, other drugs used for prophylaxis of AIDS-related opportunistic diseases, such as sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and pentamidine, can produce necrotizing pancreatitis. Despite comorbidities that can lead to pancreatic involvement in the HIV/AIDS population, antiretroviral drug-induced pancreatitis should always be considered in the diagnosis of patients with abdominal pain and elevated pancreatic enzymes.

A case study and review of pancreatitis in the AIDS population

This case study considers a 55-year-old African American woman with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who presented with epigastric abdominal pain for 1 week. She was found to have pancreatitis on computed tomography scanning. Unique to this case are the numerous possible etiologies of her pancreatitis. Thus, this case study systematically reviews the different etiologies of pancreatitis in the AIDS population compared to the general population. Furthermore it discusses the management and treatment of pancreatitis in AIDS.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review

The diagnosis of drug-induced acute pancreatitis often is difficult to establish. Although some medications have been shown to cause acute pancreatitis with a large body of evidence, including rechallenge, some medications have been attributed as a cause of acute pancreatitis merely by a single published case report in which the investigators found no other cause. In addition, some medications reported to have caused acute pancreatitis have obvious patterns of presentation, including the time from initiation to the development of disease (latency). There also appear to be patterns in the severity of disease. After reviewing the literature, we have classified drugs that have been reported to cause acute pancreatitis based on the published weight of evidence for each agent and the pattern of clinical presentation. Based on our analysis of the level of evidence, 4 classes of drugs could be identified. Class I drugs include medications in which at least 1 case report described a recurrence of acute pancreatitis with a rechallenge with the drug. Class II drugs include drugs in which there is a consistent latency in 75% or more of the reported cases. Class III drugs include drugs that had 2 or more case reports published, but neither a rechallenge nor a consistent latency period. Class IV drugs were similar to class III drugs, but only 1 case report had been published. Our analysis allows an evidence-based approach when suspecting a drug as causing acute pancreatitis.

CD4+ T cell evolution and predictors of its trend before and after tenofovir/didanosine backbone in the presence of sustained undetectable HIV plasma viral load

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir with full-dose didanosine has been associated with paradoxical CD4 + T cell decrease despite virological suppression. We investigated whether tenofovir plus didanosine at a weight-adjusted dosage could be responsible for such an effect, and factors associated with CD4 + T cell count evolution under this combination.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational multicohort study (Italian MASTER and Spanish Hospital Carlos III HIV cohorts). Patients with HIV plasma viral load suppression for >/= 6 months who switched to an antiretroviral combination including tenofovir plus didanosine were studied, as long as virological success was maintained. CD4 + T cell count variations over time (slopes) were compared before and after switching to tenofovir plus didanosine using linear mixed models and segmented regression analysis.

RESULTS

Annual time-weighted CD4 + T cell count slope did not change significantly after the prescription of tenofovir plus didanosine: it was 14 cells/mm(3) [95% confidence interval (CI) - 7 to 35] from month - 24 to month - 12, 12 cells/mm(3) (95% CI - 14 to 38) from month - 12 to the time of switching, 30 cells/mm(3) (95% CI 5-55) from switching to month + 12 and 15 cells/mm(3) (95% CI - 8 to 39) from month + 12 to month + 24 after switching to tenofovir plus didanosine. No significant change in the slope of the segment after the switch to tenofovir plus didanosine-containing regimens when compared with the segment preceding the intervention was found (CD4 + T cell count slope change: 24 cells/mm(3); 95% CI - 10 to 58). Similar results were obtained using CD4 + T cell percentage over total lymphocytes. The significant independent predictors of lower CD4 + T cell count slope were older age (P = 0.006), lower nadir CD4 + T cell count (P < 0.001) and positive hepatitis C virus antibody (P = 0.03). Moreover, reduced estimated creatinine clearance was an additional independent predictor of lower CD4 + T cell count slope (P = 0.02), but only after excluding nadir CD4 + T cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenofovir plus didanosine (weight-adjusted dosage) was not associated with paradoxical CD4 + T cell decrease in our patients maintaining undetectable HIV plasma viral load for a maximum of 24 months after switching. Several factors could explain variability in CD4 + T cell count evolution in these patients.

Antiviral hepatitis and antiretroviral drug interactions

More and more HIV-infected patients are treated for viral hepatitis, increasing interactions. HEPATITIS C: The concomitant use of didanosine and ribavirin increases the risk of mitochondrial toxicity, responsible for pancreatitis and/or lactic acidosis. Lactic acidosis is characterized by a high mortality rate. Thus, didanosine, but also stavudine, should not be co-administered with ribavirin. Cases of hepatic decompensation have been reported in cirrhotics concomitantly receiving ribavirin and didanosine. Thus, this co-admininistration should be contraindicated in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. Anemia is a frequent side effect of ribavirin. In patients with zidovudine-related anemia, this drug should be discontinued before prescribing ribavirin. Erythropoietin may help to improve the haemoglobin level. HEPATITIS B: Adefovir significantly decreases the plasma levels of saquinavir. Pancreatitis may occur with the co-administration of didanosine and tenofovir. Thus this co-administration should be avoided. Atazanavir concentrations are decreased when tenofovir is co-administered. Thus, atazanavir should be boosted with ritonavir, when combined with tenofovir. Atazanavir increases the concentrations of tenofovir, with the potential risk of increasing the adverse events of tenofovir, including renal disorders. Tenofovir area under the curve is increased if lopinavir-ritonavir are co-administered. The main interactions, with a fatal risk, are observed with didanosine, when co-administered with ribavirin (hepatitis C) or with tenofovir (hepatitis B). Anemia is frequent, but usually moderate, when zidovudine is co-administered with ribavirin. Other interactions are usually easy to manage.

Exploring Mitochondrial Nephrotoxicity as a Potential Mechanism of Kidney Dysfunction among HIV-Infected Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Background

Tenofovir (TDF) exposure has been associated with renal dysfunction. Mitochondrial nephrotoxicity was investigated as an underlying mechanism. Given the interaction between TDF and didanosine (ddI), their concurrent use was also investigated.

Design

Relative kidney biopsy mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to nuclear DNA ratios were measured retrospectively. HIV+ individuals on TDF within 6 months preceeding the biopsy (HIV+/TDF+, n=21) were compared to HIV+ individuals who never received TDF (HIV+/TDF-, n=10) and to HIV uninfected controls (HIV–, n=22). Twelve of the HIV+/TDF+ individuals received concurrent ddI, 10 of those once at unadjusted ddI dosage. Tubular mitochondria morphology was also examined by electron microscopy. Statistical analyses were done on log-transformed mtDNA/nDNA, using non-parametric tests.

Results

Kidney mtDNA levels were different among the three groups ( P=0.046). mtDNA ratios were lower in HIV+/TDF+ subjects (7.5 [2.0–12.1]) than in HIV- ones (14.3 [6.0–16.5], P=0.014), but not lower than HIV+/TDF-controls (6.4 [2.8–11.9], P=0.82). Among HIV+ subjects, there was a difference between TDF-, TDF+/ddI- and TDF+/ddI+ ( P=0.005), with concurrent TDF/ddI use associated with lower mtDNA (2.1 [1.9–5.5], n=12) than TDF+/ddI- (13.8 [7.5–16.4], n=9, P=0.003). No TDF–/ddI+ biopsies were available. In regression analyses, only HIV infection ( P=0.03), and TDF/ddI use ( P=0.003) were associated with lower mtDNA. At the ultrastructural level, abnormal tubular mitochondria was more prevalent in HIV+/TDF+ biopsies than HIV+/TDF- and HIV- ones together ( P<0.001) but not more so in TDF+/ddI+ biopsies than TDF+/ddI- ones ( P=0.67).

Conclusions

Renal dysfunction in this population may be mediated through mitochondrial nephrotoxicity that involves more than one drug and/or pathogenesis. Kidney mtDNA depletion was associated with HIV infection and concurrent TDF/ddI therapy but not TDF use alone, while kidney ultrastructural mitochondrial abnormalities were seen with TDF use. The interaction between TDF and ddI may be relevant in the kidney where both drugs are cleared. The clinical relevance of our findings needs to be evaluated given the current recommendation for reduced doses of ddI when used in conjunction with TDF.

Paradoxical CD4+ T-cell decline in HIV-infected patients with complete virus suppression taking tenofovir and didanosine

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir (TDF) and didanosine (ddI) are both adenosine analogues with convenient posology, strong potency and a relatively high genetic barrier for resistance. The popularity of this combination, however, has been questioned due to concerns about pharmacokinetic interactions and increased risk of pancreatitis and hyperglycemia. Less information is available about other possible side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HIV-infected individuals who initiated a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen between September 2002 and June 2003 at five hospitals, and had at least one subsequent visit within the next 12 months, always with complete virus suppression, were retrospectively assessed. Only drug-naive individuals and patients who simplified a prior successful antiretroviral regimen were analysed.

RESULTS

Outcomes were analysed in 570 individuals according to treatment modality (98 drug-naive versus 472 simplified); the nucleoside analogue (NA) backbone (298 with TDF + ddI, 88 with ddI, 44 with TDF, and 140 with neither ddI nor TDF); and the third agent used (378 with non-nucleoside analogues versus 192 with NA). Significant CD4+ T-cell declines were seen in patients taking ddI + TDF with respect to all other NA combinations, including ddI or TDF separately. Patients exposed to high ddI doses or taking a third NA showed more pronounced CD4 declines. Plasma levels of ddI correlated with the extent of CD4+ T-cell loss.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving ddI + TDF-based combinations show CD4+ T-cell declines despite achieving complete virus suppression. This effect generally progresses with time. An imbalance in adenosine metabolites within CD4+ T lymphocytes may explain this phenomenon, which resembles the genetic purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency syndrome.