Interaction between valproate and meropenem: a retrospective study

Clinical impact of carbapenems in critically ill patients with valproic acid therapy: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most widely used broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs, and carbapenems (CBPs) remain the drug of choice for severe infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria in critically ill patients. The interaction between VPA and CBPs can lead to a rapid depletion of serum VPA level. This may then cause status epilepticus (SE), which is associated with significant mortality. However, the prognostic impact of drug interactions in critically ill patients remains an under-investigated issue.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of critically ill patients treated with VPA and concomitant CBPs or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Methods

Adult patients admitted to a medical center intensive care unit between January 2007 and December 2017 who concomitantly received VPA and antibiotics were enrolled. The risk of reduced VPA serum concentration, seizures and SE, mortality rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and healthcare expenditure after concomitant administration were analyzed after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 1,277 patients were included in the study, of whom 264 (20.7%) concomitantly received VPA and CBPs. After matching, the patients who received CBPs were associated with lower VPA serum concentration (15.8 vs. 60.8 mg/L; p < 0.0001), a higher risk of seizures (51.2 vs. 32.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.48–3.24; p < 0.0001), higher risk of SE (13.6 vs. 4.7%; aOR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.51–6.74; p = 0.0014), higher in-hospital mortality rate (33.8 vs. 24.9%; aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03–2.20; p = 0.036), longer LOS after concomitant therapy (41 vs. 30 days; p < 0.001), and increased healthcare expenditure (US$20,970 vs. US$12,848; p < 0.0001) than those who received other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Conclusion

The administration of CBPs in epileptic patients under VPA therapy was associated with lower VAP serum concentration, a higher risk of seizures and SE, mortality, longer LOS, and significant utilization of healthcare resources. Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the concomitant use of VPA and CBPs when treating patients with epilepsy. Further studies are warranted to investigate the reason for the poor outcomes and whether avoiding the co-administration of VPA and CBP can improve the outcomes of epileptic patients.

Clinical Evaluation of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Combination for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection: Evidence to Date

As antimicrobial resistance continues to grow, one of the biggest threats includes the members of the Enterobacterales order presenting with carbapenem resistance (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, along with other beta-lactam/beta-lactamase agents, has been developed to help combat this growing concern and is currently approved to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), as well as acute pyelonephritis (AP), in the USA. Vaborbactam is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor designed specifically to optimize and restore the activity of meropenem against resistant Enterobacterales. Vaborbactam inhibits a number of beta-lactamases, including in vitro activity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) group. KPC represents one of the most clinically relevant carbapenemase in the USA, accounting for the majority of carbapenemase-producing CRE. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in the two Phase 3, noninferiority trials, TANGO I and TANGO II. TANGO I compared meropenem-vaborbactam against piperacillin-tazobactam in patients with cUTIs and was found to be noninferior for overall success and microbial eradication. TANGO II expanded to other disease states (bacteremia, hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia [HAP/VAP], complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], cUTI/AP) and was found to be noninferior against best available therapy (BAT) with respect to clinical cure at the end of treatment and the test of cure. Meropenem-vaborbactam maintained the established safety profile of meropenem alone, with headache as the most common adverse event in both phase 3 studies. Overall, clinical efficacy has been demonstrated and suggests the use of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of cUTI is an option.

Novel Method for Early Prediction of Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with a Machine Learning Algorithm Based on Risk Matrix Analysis in the NICU

Aims: Evidence for drug–drug interactions (DDIs) that may cause age-dependent differences in the incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in newborns is sparse. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict DDI presence by integrating each DDI, which is objectively evaluated with the scales in a risk matrix (probability + severity). Methods: This double-center, prospective randomized cohort study included neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary referral hospital during the 17-month study period. Drugs were classified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and assessed for potential and clinically relevant DDIs to risk analyses with the Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS, causal probability) and the Lexicomp^® DDI (severity) database. Results: A total of 412 neonates (median (interquartile range) gestational age of 37 (4) weeks) were included with 32,925 patient days, 131 different medications, and 11,908 medication orders. Overall, at least one potential DDI was observed in 125 (30.4%) of the patients (2.6 potential DDI/patient). A total of 38 of these 125 patients had clinically relevant DDIs causing adverse drug reactions (2.0 clinical DDI/patient). The vast majority of these DDIs (90.66%) were assessed to be at moderate risk. The performance of the ML algorithms that predicts of the presence of relevant DDI was as follows: accuracy 0.944 (95% CI 0.888–0.972), sensitivity 0.892 (95% CI 0.769–0.962), F1 score 0.904, and AUC 0.929 (95% CI 0.874–0.983). Conclusions: In clinical practice, it is expected that optimization in treatment can be achieved with the implementation of this high-performance web tool, created to predict DDIs before they occur with a newborn-centered approach.

A Retrospective Case Series of Concomitant Carbapenem and Valproic Acid Use: Are Best Practice Advisories Working?

Background: A Best Practice Advisory (BPA) warns clinicians of an interaction between carbapenems and valproic acid (VPA) that can cause significant declines in VPA levels leading to serious consequences for patients treated for seizure disorder and unknown implications for alternative indications. Objective: The goal of this study was to assess BPA efficacy in avoiding concomitant VPA/carbapenems, and to characterize use of these agents, clinical implications, and potential alternative therapeutic options. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients over the course of 1 year who were concomitantly prescribed a carbapenem and VPA at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Data collected included: level of care, duration of concomitant therapy, indications, VPA levels during or surrounding overlap, documentation of the interaction, and therapeutic implications. Results: Carbapenems and VPA were administered to 591 and 625 patients, respectively; the BPA fired 126 times in 24 patients, and 15 patients were initiated on these agents concomitantly. Eight (53%) patients received VPA for seizures. The remaining seven (47%) received VPA for alternative indications. Eight of nine VPA levels were sub-therapeutic during carbapenem therapy and polypharmacy was administered in all patients receiving VPA for non-convulsive indications. Conclusion: Co-prescribing of these drugs was rare; however, the BPA was ineffective in 63% of instances. Reductions in VPA efficacy for any indication should be expected with concomitant carbapenem administration. Antibiotics other than carbapenems should be considered when coverage of multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens is required in patients whose VPA treatment cannot be interrupted or switched to a therapeutic alternative.

Effect of drug interactions between carbapenems and valproate on serum valproate concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Concurrent use of valproate and carbapenem antibiotics may decrease serum valproate concentration (SVC). This study evaluated the effects of carbapenem-valproate drug interactions. Research design and methods: We screened PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the effect of concurrent use of carbapenem and valproate compared with valproate alone on SVC. Primary outcomes were the change in SVC from before the addition of the carbapenem to the SVC during the use of carbapenems and after carbapenem discontinuation, and seizure-related outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the influence of valproate or carbapenem dose on SVC and Drug Interaction Probability Scale scores. Results: Twelve studies (633 patients) were included. Compared with valproate alone, combination treatment with carbapenem substantially decreased mean SVC (mean difference, -43.98 mg/L; 95% confidence interval, -48.18 to -39.78). The onset of SVC decreases was within 1-3 days following carbapenem initiation. Seizure frequency increased by 26.3% during combination treatment. No difference was found in mean SVC between the different doses of valproate or carbapenem during combination treatment. Mean SVC increased to similar pre-carbapenem level within 1 to 2 weeks after carbapenem discontinuation. Conclusions: The drug interaction between valproate and carbapenem causes substantial SVC decreases, even to subtherapeutic levels, which may increase the risk of seizures.

Interactions between carbapenems and valproic acid among the patients in the intensive care units

PURPOSE

To evaluate risk factors for epileptic seizures or status epilepticus (SE) in patients concomitantly receiving valproic acid (VPA) and carbapenems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) who concomitantly received VPA and carbapenems from 2007 to 2017 were included. The impacts of different carbapenems on serum concentration of VPA were compared.

RESULTS

Among 162 patients included, 104 (64.2%) and 45 (27.8%) developed epileptic seizures and SE, respectively. The risk factors for epileptic seizures were age (per year increase, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03), initial antiepileptic regimen (monotherapy and polytherapy, aOR, 0.43 and 0.18, respectively), and VPA serum concentration after concomitant carbapenem administration (per 1 μg/mL increase, aOR, 0.96). VPA serum concentration after concomitant carbapenem administration was an independent risk factor for SE (per μg/mL increase, aOR, 0.98). Concomitant imipenem/cilastatin administration did not significantly decrease VPA serum concentration compared to that by meropenem or ertapenem. The length of stay and number of days on ventilation after concomitant carbapenem administration in the ICUs were significantly more in those with epileptic seizures or SE.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenems decreased VPA serum concentration and increased the risk of epileptic seizures and SE, which led to increased length of ICU stay.

Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

This is the third chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. The chapter features the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of the most frequently used antiinfective agents.

Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit - A retrospective analysis

Several studies demonstrated a significant decrease in prescription errors, adverse drug events, treatment costs and improved patient outcomes, when a clinical pharmacist (CP) was a full member of a multidisciplinary team in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to evaluate the activities of a CP, included in a 12-bed medical ICU team of a university hospital in the course of several months. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the CP’s interventions from March 2017 to November 2017, carried out and documented after reviewing and discussing patients’ medical data with the treating ICU physicians. We identified four main categories of CP’s interventions: pharmacotherapy adjustments to kidney function (PAKF category), drug-drug interactions (DDIs category), therapeutic monitoring of drugs with narrow therapeutic index (TDM category), and drug administration by the nasogastric tube (NGT category). During the study period, 533 patients were admitted to the medical ICU. The CP reviewed the medical data of 321 patients and suggested 307 interventions in 95 patients. There were 147 interventions of the PAKF category, 57 interventions of the TDM category, 30 interventions of the NGT category, and 22 interventions of the DDIs category. Fifty-one interventions were unspecified. The majority of all interventions (203/307) were related to antimicrobial drugs. ICU physicians completely accepted 80.2% of the CP’s suggestions. We observed that regular participation of the CP in the medical ICU team contributed to more individualized and improved pharmacological treatment of patients. Therefore, ICU teams should be encouraged to include CPs as regular team members.

Valproate Interaction With Carbapenems: Review and Recommendations

Introduction: Valproic acid is a commonly used antiepileptic drug. Combining valproate derivatives with carbapenem antibiotics is associated with a potential drug interaction that decreases serum concentration of valproate and may expose the patient to uncontrolled seizure risk from valproate subtherapeutic concentration. Raising awareness of this drug interaction among health care providers including emergency department physicians, neurologists, and pharmacists is highly needed. The aim of this article was to review the current literature about the potential drug interaction resulting from combining valproate derivatives with carbapenem antibiotics and to establish therapeutic recommendations regarding their use together. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted using Medline (through PubMed), Ovid, Embase, Cochrane library using the following keywords: valproate, valproic acid, carbapenem, ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem, imipenem, and valproate drug interaction. In addition, a manual search through major journals for articles referenced in PubMed was performed. Related publications from January 1998 till November 2018 were included in the initial search. Relevant publications were reviewed, and data regarding patients, type of carbapenem used, valproic acid dosing and level, interaction severity, and clinical outcome were summarized. Results and Discussion: Few clinical trials and multiple case reports have shown that carbapenem antibiotics including meropenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and doripenem can decrease the serum concentration of valproate derivatives leading to a subtherapeutic serum concentration and seizures in some patients. Valproic acid serum concentration may be significantly decreased with addition of a carbapenem antibiotic but generally return toward normal shortly after discontinuation of the carbapenem antibiotic. Conclusions: Generally, the concurrent use of carbapenem antibiotics with valproate derivatives should be avoided due to the potential of drug-drug interaction that results in subtherapeutic valproate serum concentration. Other antimicrobial agents should be considered as alternatives to carbapenems but if a concurrent carbapenem is necessary, using an additional antiepileptic agent is recommended. Therapeutic drug monitoring of valproate serum concentrations is warranted when a carbapenem-valproic acid combination therapy is unavoidable.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and vaborbactam for the treatment of urinary tract infection

INTRODUCTION

Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) represents the first carbapenem and β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. Vaborbactam is a novel boronic acid, β-lactamase inhibitor with a high affinity for serine β-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). This combination, Vabomere™, was approved in August 2017 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cUTIs in patients 18 years or older, including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible microorganisms: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae species complex. Areas covered: Relevant literature regarding microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability will be discussed. Expert opinion: Current treatment options for KPC-producing infections such as aminoglycosides, polymyxins, fosfomycin, and tigecycline are associated with concerns regarding efficacy, toxicities, optimal dosing, and/or development of resistance. Additionally, resistance to the new combination product of ceftazidime/avibactam has also emerged. Current clinical evidence supporting the use of M/V for KPC-producing infections is limited to an open-label, randomized, phase III study in a small number of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Although M/V is not approved for KPC-producing infections, we believe that M/V will become a preferred agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Neurological Adverse Effects Attributable to β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Literature Review

β-lactam antibiotics are commonly prescribed antibiotic drugs. To describe the clinical characteristics, risk markers and outcomes of β-lactam antibiotic-induced neurological adverse effects, we performed a general literature review to provide updated clinical data about the most used β-lactam antibiotics. For selected drugs in each class available in France (ticarcillin, piperacillin, temocillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefpirome, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, ceftolozane, ertapenem and aztreonam), a systematic literature review was performed up to April 2016 via an electronic search on PubMed. Articles that reported original data, written in French, Spanish, Portuguese or English, with available individual data for patients with neurological symptoms (such as seizure, disturbed vigilance, confusional state, myoclonia, localising signs, and/or hallucinations) after the introduction of a β-lactam antibiotic were included. The neurological adverse effects of piperacillin and ertapenem are often described as seizures and hallucinations (>50 and 25% of cases, respectively). Antibiotic treatment is often adapted to renal function (>70%), and underlying brain abnormalities are seen in one in four to one in three cases. By contrast, the neurological adverse drug reactions of ceftazidime and cefepime often include abnormal movements but few hallucinations and seizures. These reactions are associated with renal insufficiency (>80%) and doses are rarely adapted to renal function. Otherwise, it appears that monobactams do not have serious neurological adverse drug reactions and that valproic acid and carbapenem combinations should be avoided. The onset of disturbed vigilance, myoclonus, and/or seizure in a patient taking β-lactam antibiotics, especially if associated with renal insufficiency or underlying brain abnormalities, should lead physicians to suspect adverse drug reactions and to consider changes in antibacterial therapy.

Repurposing Valproate, Enteral Clonidine, and Phenobarbital for Comfort in Adult ICU Patients: A Literature Review with Practical Considerations

Provision of adequate sedation is a fundamental part of caring for critically ill patients. Propofol, dexmedetomidine, and benzodiazepines are the most commonly administered sedative medications for adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). These agents are limited by adverse effects, need for a monitored environment for safe administration, and lack of universal effectiveness. Increased interest has recently been expressed about repurposing older pharmacologic agents for patient comfort in the ICU. Valproate, enteral clonidine, and phenobarbital are three agents with increasing evidence supporting their use. Potential benefits associated with their utilization are cost minimization and safe administration after transition out of the ICU. This literature review describes the historical context, pharmacologic characteristics, supportive data, and practical considerations associated with the administration of these agents for comfort in critically ill adult patients.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam, the First Carbapenem/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, efficacy, administration, and considerations for clinical use of meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (June 2013 to December 2017) was conducted using the search terms meropenem, vaborbactam, RPX7009, biapenem, RPX2003, and carbavance. References from relevant articles and conference abstracts were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Preclinical, phase I studies, and phase III studies written in the English language were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

M/V is a novel carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor antimicrobial with in vitro activity against nearly 99% of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. M/V is approved for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. In a phase III cUTI trial (TANGO I), 98.4% of patients treated with M/V experienced overall clinical success compared with 94% of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam (95% CI = 0.7 to 9.1). When compared with best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections in TANGO II, patients receiving M/V were more likely to achieve clinical cure at both the end of therapy (64.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.04) as well as at the test of cure (57.1% vs 26.7%, P = 0.04). The most common adverse effects associated with M/V were headache, infusion-site reactions, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

M/V has a valuable role in the treatment of CRE and should be used judiciously to preserve its use for resistant infections.

The Effect of Different Carbapenem Antibiotics (Ertapenem, Imipenem/Cilastatin, and Meropenem) on Serum Valproic Acid Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem antibiotics (CBPMs) may significantly reduce the serum concentration of valproic acid (VPA), but the extent of this effect among various CBPMs is unknown. This study compared the extent and onset of the interactions among ertapenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and meropenem.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective study was performed. Hospitalized patients over 18 years old who received VPA and a CBPM concurrently were enrolled via the pharmacy computer system. Patients who lacked VPA serum concentration measurements before or during CBPMs' use, had concurrent medication(s) that might interfere with VPA metabolism, or had a history of liver cirrhosis were excluded. Total VPA serum concentrations before and during CBPMs' use and after its discontinuation were recorded, and differences among various CBPMs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included in this analysis. Irrespective of the route of administration, VPA serum concentrations were subtherapeutic in 90% of the subjects during CBPMs' use. There was a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in VPA serum concentrations during the use of CBPMs: 72% ± 17%, 42% ± 22%, and 67% ± 19% in the ertapenem (N = 9), imipenem/cilastatin (N = 17), and meropenem (N = 26) groups, respectively. The effect of ertapenem and meropenem on VPA was significantly more expressed than that of imipenem/cilastatin (P < 0.005). The onset of this drug interaction occurred within 24 hours of CBPMs' administration, and VPA serum concentrations returned to 90% of baseline within 7 days of CBPMs' discontinuation along with a 20% increase in VPA dose. Increasing VPA dose during the use of ertapenem or meropenem did not result in elevating VPA serum concentrations to therapeutic levels during the combined therapy period.

CONCLUSIONS

CBPMs reduced VPA serum concentration within 24 hours of administration by approximately 60%. Ertapenem and meropenem had a greater effect on VPA serum concentration than imipenem/cilastatin. Because of the dramatic reduction of VPA serum concentration during CBPMs' use, concomitant use of VPA and CBPMs should be avoided.

Pharmacological interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem: what about levels in pediatrics?

Valproic acid (VPA) is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug in pediatric patients, but its major drawback is its multiple pharmacological interactions.

OBJECTIVE

To study children who had been simultaneously treated with carbapenems and valproic acid, considering drug levels, pharmacological interactions and clinical follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of children who simultaneously received treatment with VPA and carbapenems between January 2003 and December 2011. Demographic variables, indication of treatment, dose, VPA plasma levels, interactions, clinical manifestations and medical management were analyzed.

RESULTS

28 children with concomitant treatment with both drugs were included in the study. 64.3% were males. 78.6% of the interactions were observed in the Intensive Care Unit. 60.7% of children had been previously treated VPA and its major indication were generalized seizures. Basal plasma levels of VPA were recorded in 53% and at 24 h after admittance in 60%. "40% of basal VPA levels were below therapeutic range prior to the administration of carbapenem. After the introduction of carbapenem 88% of level determinations were below therapeutic range". 54.5% of the patients that were chronically receiving VPA and had good control of epilepsy before admission had seizures during the coadministration. One patient that was on VPA before admission but with bad control of epilepsy worsened, and one patient that acutely received VPA did not achieve seizure freedom. In these cases it was necessary to either increase VPA dose or change to a different antiepileptic drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is known about the mechanism of pharmacologic interactions between carbapenems and VPA, but it leads to a reduction in plasma levels that may cause a loss of seizure control, so simultaneous use of both drugs should be avoided when possible. If not, VPA levels should be monitored.

Antibiotic-induced neurotoxicity

Antibiotic neurotoxicity is rare but can cause significant morbidity when it occurs. The risk of antibiotic neurotoxicity appears to be highest in patients who are older, have impaired renal function, or have preexisting neurologic conditions. This review describes the clinical features of the most common antibiotic toxicities affecting the nervous system: seizures, encephalopathy, optic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and exacerbation of myasthenia gravis.

[Effect of modal computer-based alerts on the prescription of valproic acid and meropenem]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of modal computer-based alerts on the concomitant prescription of valproic acid (VPA) and meropenem.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Analytical intervention study conducted in a tertiary hospital for eleven months. Hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy and treated with VPA and meropenem in concomitant therapy were included. In the computerized prescription order entry software an automatic non-modal alert was reconverted to a modal one. This was triggered when the physician introduced VPA and meropenem together in the same prescription. To measure the effect of this alert the prescription habits were compared with a previous period in which the alert was not modal.

RESULTS

Modal computer-based alert modified the prescription habit by reducing the number of patients with concomitant treatment from 13 to 4 (P=.046). However, it was notable that the number of requests for VPA serum levels decreased, and the average number of concomitant days of treatment rose from 4.7 to 8.75 in those patients in which none of the drugs was suspended.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of modal computer-based alerts reduces patient exposure to concomitant treatment with meropenem and VPA.

Seizures from valproate-carbapenem interaction

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic medication interactions can complicate the management of epilepsy, by either increasing or reducing the effective serum concentrations thereby causing adverse effects or loss of seizure control.

RESULTS

A 14-year-old girl with well-controlled juvenile absence epilepsy lost control of her seizures acutely following the administration of carbapenem for pneumonia. Serum valproate concentrations fell by 90% within 48 hours following carbapenem and returned to baseline following its discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of this clinically significant interaction alters clinical practice by avoiding carbapenem or temporary use of adjunctive medication to prevent the clinical consequences of this significant drug interaction.

Levetiracetam compared to valproic acid: plasma concentration levels, adverse effects and interactions in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Both valproic acid and levetiracetam are anti-epileptic drugs, often used either alone or in combination. The present study compares valproate (VPA) with levetiracetam (LEV) as an intravenous (i.v.) anticonvulsant treatment in intensive care patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) with a high risk of seizures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, single-center patient registry of 35 intensive care unit (ICU) patients with onset seizure and/or high risk of seizures underwent an anticonvulsive, first-line single treatment regimen either with VPA or LEV. Plasma concentrations (pc), interactions between drugs in the ICU context, adverse effects and seizure occurrences were observed and recorded.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in the pc in patients treated with LEV was observed after changing from intravenous (160±51μmol/l) to enteral liquid application (113±58μmol/l), corresponding to a 70.3% bioavailability for enteral liquid applications. The pc in VPA patients decreased significantly, from (491±138μmol/l) to (141±50μmol/l), after adding meropenem to the therapy (p<0.05). Three epileptic seizures occurred during anticonvulsive therapy in the LEV group, and two in the VPA group, including one non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).

CONCLUSION

Though this finding needs further verification, the enteral liquid application of levetiracetam seems to be associated with lower bioavailability than the common oral application of levetiracetam. The use of the antibiotic drug meropenem together with valproic acid leads to lower pc levels in patients treated with of valproic acid. For clinical practice, this indicates the need to monitor the levels of valproic acid in combination with meropenem.

[Analysis of the valproic acid-meropenem interaction in hospitalised patients]

INTRODUCTION

Published data demonstrate a serious interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. However, recommendations about the management of concomitant treatment are contradictory; some experts recommend closer monitoring of valproic acid serum concentrations and others recommend avoiding concurrent therapy. The purpose of this study is to critically analyse the interaction and to evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical intervention in the use of these drugs in hospitalised patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study of the concomitant prescription of valproic acid and meropenem in a general hospital of 1,080 beds divided in to two periods; the first period was retrospective and observational and it was followed by a prospective period involving pharmaceutical intervention. The prescription habits between both periods were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients received concurrent treatment with valproic acid and meropenem (13 per period) and none of them maintained therapeutic serum levels of the antiepileptic drug. Pharmaceutical intervention modified prescription habits, reducing by half the number of days of concomitant treatment, changing the antibiotherapy and/or monitoring serum concentrations more often.

CONCLUSIONS

The interaction between valproic acid and meropenem is serious, especially because of the dramatic decrease in the antiepileptic serum concentrations. The concomitant use of both drugs should be avoided, replacing the antibiotherapy empirically, or according to the resistance profiles of the microorganism and maintaining the same the anti-epileptic treatment.

Drug interaction between carbapenems and extended-release divalproex sodium in a patient with schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

Clinicians prescribing divalproex sodium (DVX) are well aware of its potential to cause a drug-drug interaction. One specific interaction occurs between the carbapenem antibiotics and DVX resulting in decreased valproic acid (VPA) levels immediately following the initiation of this antibiotic class.

OBJECTIVE/METHOD

We describe a case of a 46 year-old Caucasian male who had an undetectable VPA level following treatment with carbapenems.

RESULTS

On admission the patient's VPA level was 115 μg/ml; however, a routine VPA level on day 19 of his hospitalization returned a value of 16 μg/ml. At this point, he had received a total of 15 days of carbapenem antibiotics for treatment of lower leg cellulitis. His DVX dose was increased to a maximum of 6g daily, twice his home dose, but it did not produce a therapeutic VPA concentration. The patient was lost to follow-up before an outpatient VPA level was drawn.

CONCLUSION

Our case report is the first to document this drug-drug interaction in a patient diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of valproate]

Valproic acid is an anticonvulsant drug available in France since 1967. It is a broad spectrum molecule indicated in various forms of epilepsy of the adult and the child, but it is also prescribed in the treatment of different other pathologies of nervous system. The divalproate sodium is indicated in the treatment of bipolar disorders. The valproic acid is marketed under various pharmaceutical forms, with different corresponding tmax values. But, whatever the administered preparation, the circulating active molecule is the ion valproate. Elimination half-life is from 11 to 20 h. Metabolization of valproate is important and represents its main route of elimination. Valpromide is comparable to a prodrug which metabolizes in valproate. The inter and intraindividual variability of the plasma concentrations are important. Several studies show a concentration-effect relationship, but two interventional trials ended in the lack of interest of the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), although it is of current practice. However, numerous drug interactions may modify the plasma concentrations of valproate. The therapeutic range is from 50 to 100 mg/L (346-693 micromol/L). The level of proof of the interest of the TDM for this molecule was estimated in: recommended.

Pharmacological management of seizures and status epilepticus in critically ill patients

Seizures are serious complications seen in critically ill patients and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if the cause is not identified and treated quickly. Uncontrolled seizures can lead to status epilepticus (SE), which is considered a medical emergency. The first-line treatment of seizures is an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine followed by anticonvulsant therapy. Refractory SE can evolve into a nonconvulsive state requiring IV anesthetics or induction of pharmacological coma. To prevent seizures and further complications in critically ill patients with acute neurological disease or injury, short-term seizure prophylaxis should be considered in certain patients.

[Mechanisms of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions]

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions occur when a drug alters the disposition (absorption, distribution, elimination) of a coadministered agent. Pharmacokinetic interactions may result in the increase or the decrease of plasma drug concentrations. These modifications are variable in intensity but can lead to contraindications of the association. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic interactions involve drug metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters and orphan nuclear receptors that regulate at the transcriptional level the expression of enzymes and transporters. The increase of drug plasma concentrations is generally related to the inhibition of enzymes and/or drug transport. The decrease of drug concentrations reflects the activation of orphan nuclear receptors by inducers that lead to the increase of the expression of enzymes and drug transporters. Inhibition of drug metabolism or transport is quite immediate (24-48h) while induction is a slower process (7-10 days). Complex situations may be observed with drugs that are both inducers and inhibitors (rifampin, ritonavir). They can cause the decrease and the increase of the exposure of the combined agent depending on the duration of the association.

Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections

Meropenem (Merrem, Meronem) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent of the carbapenem family, indicated as empirical therapy prior to the identification of causative organisms, or for disease caused by single or multiple susceptible bacteria in both adults and children with a broad range of serious infections. Meropenem is approved for use in complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and bacterial meningitis (in paediatric patients aged > or = 3 months) in the US, and in most other countries for nosocomial pneumonia, cIAI, septicaemia, febrile neutropenia, cSSSI, bacterial meningitis, complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), obstetric and gynaecological infections, in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations, and for the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Meropenem has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. It has similar efficacy to comparator antibacterial agents, including: imipenem/cilastatin in cIAI, cSSSI, febrile neutropenia, complicated UTI, obstetric or gynaecological infections and severe CAP; clindamycin plus tobramycin or gentamicin in cIAI or obstetric/gynaecological infections; cefotaxime plus metronidazole in cIAI; cefepime and ceftazidime plus amikacin in septicaemia or febrile neutropenia; and ceftazidime, clarithromycin plus ceftriaxone or amikacin in severe CAP. Meropenem has also shown similar efficacy to cefotaxime in paediatric and adult patients with bacterial meningitis, and to ceftazidime when both agents were administered with or without tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis experiencing acute pulmonary exacerbations. Meropenem showed greater efficacy than ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam in febrile neutropenia, and greater efficacy than ceftazidime plus amikacin or tobramycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Meropenem is well tolerated and has the advantage of being suitable for administration as an intravenous bolus or infusion. Its low propensity for inducing seizures means that it is suitable for treating bacterial meningitis and is the only carbapenem approved in this indication. Thus, meropenem continues to be an important option for the empirical treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients.