MetaGSCA: A tool for meta-analysis of gene set differential coexpression

Reinventing gene expression connectivity through regulatory and spatial structural empowerment via principal node aggregation graph neural network

The intricacies of the human genome, manifested as a complex network of genes, transcend conventional representations in text or numerical matrices. The intricate gene-to-gene relationships inherent in this complexity find a more suitable depiction in graph structures. In the pursuit of predicting gene expression, an endeavor shared by predecessors like the L1000 and Enformer methods, we introduce a novel spatial graph-neural network (GNN) approach. This innovative strategy incorporates graph features, encompassing both regulatory and structural elements. The regulatory elements include pair-wise gene correlation, biological pathways, protein-protein interaction networks, and transcription factor regulation. The spatial structural elements include chromosomal distance, histone modification and Hi-C inferred 3D genomic features. Principal Node Aggregation models, validated independently, emerge as frontrunners, demonstrating superior performance compared to traditional regression and other deep learning models. By embracing the spatial GNN paradigm, our method significantly advances the description of the intricate network of gene interactions, surpassing the performance, predictable scope, and initial requirements set by previous methods.

A Novel Strategy to Identify Prognosis-Relevant Gene Sets in Cancers

Molecular prognosis markers hold promise for improved prediction of patient survival, and a pathway or gene set may add mechanistic interpretation to their prognostic prediction power. In this study, we demonstrated a novel strategy to identify prognosis-relevant gene sets in cancers. Our study consists of a first round of gene-level analyses and a second round of gene-set-level analyses, in which the Composite Gene Expression Score critically summarizes a surrogate expression value at gene set level and a permutation procedure is exerted to assess prognostic significance of gene sets. An optional differential coexpression module is appended to the two phases of survival analyses to corroborate and refine prognostic gene sets. Our strategy was demonstrated in 33 cancer types across 32,234 gene sets. We found oncogenic gene sets accounted for an increased proportion among the final gene sets, and genes involved in DNA replication and DNA repair have ubiquitous prognositic value for multiple cancer types. In summary, we carried out the largest gene set based prognosis study to date. Compared to previous similar studies, our approach offered multiple improvements in design and methodology implementation. Functionally relevant gene sets of ubiquitous prognostic significance in multiple cancer types were identified.

RNA editing affects cis-regulatory elements and predicts adverse cancer survival

BACKGROUND

RNA editing exerts critical impacts on numerous biological processes and thus are implicated in crucial human phenotypes, including tumorigenesis and prognosis. While previous studies have analyzed aggregate RNA editing activity at the sample level and associated it with overall cancer survival, there is not yet a large-scale disease-specific survival study to examine genome-wide RNA editing sites' prognostic value taking into account the host gene expression and clinical variables.

METHODS

In this study, we solved comprehensive Cox proportional models of disease-specific survival on individual RNA-editing sites plus host gene expression and critical demographic covariates. This allowed us to interrogate the prognostic value of a large number of RNA-editing sites at single-nucleotide resolution.

RESULTS

As a result, we identified 402 gene-proximal RNA-editing sites that generally predict adverse cancer survival. For example, an RNA-editing site residing in ZNF264 indicates poor survival of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, with a hazard ratio of 2.13 and an adjusted p-value of 4.07 × 10-7 . Some of these prognostic RNA-editing sites mediate the binding of RNA binding proteins and microRNAs, thus propagating their impacts to extensive regulatory targets.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, RNA editing affects cis-regulatory elements and predicts adverse cancer survival.