Constructing functional models from biophysically-detailed neurons

Relationships and representations of brain structures, connectivity, dynamics and functions

The review explores the complex interplay between brain structures and their associated functions, presenting a diversity of hierarchical models that enhances our understanding of these relationships. Central to this approach are structure-function flow diagrams, which offer a visual representation of how specific neuroanatomical structures are linked to their functional roles. These diagrams are instrumental in mapping the intricate connections between different brain regions, providing a clearer understanding of how functions emerge from the underlying neural architecture. The study details innovative attempts to develop new functional hierarchies that integrate structural and functional data. These efforts leverage recent advancements in neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI, EEG, MEG, and PET, as well as computational models that simulate neural dynamics. By combining these approaches, the study seeks to create a more refined and dynamic hierarchy that can accommodate the brain's complexity, including its capacity for plasticity and adaptation. A significant focus is placed on the overlap of structures and functions within the brain. The manuscript acknowledges that many brain regions are multifunctional, contributing to different cognitive and behavioral processes depending on the context. This overlap highlights the need for a flexible, non-linear hierarchy that can capture the brain's intricate functional landscape. Moreover, the study examines the interdependence of these functions, emphasizing how the loss or impairment of one function can impact others. Another crucial aspect discussed is the brain's ability to compensate for functional deficits following neurological diseases or injuries. The investigation explores how the brain reorganizes itself, often through the recruitment of alternative neural pathways or the enhancement of existing ones, to maintain functionality despite structural damage. This compensatory mechanism underscores the brain's remarkable plasticity, demonstrating its ability to adapt and reconfigure itself in response to injury, thereby ensuring the continuation of essential functions. In conclusion, the study presents a system of brain functions that integrates structural, functional, and dynamic perspectives. It offers a robust framework for understanding how the brain's complex network of structures supports a wide range of cognitive and behavioral functions, with significant implications for both basic neuroscience and clinical applications.

A scalable spiking amygdala model that explains fear conditioning, extinction, renewal and generalization

The amygdala (AMY) is widely implicated in fear learning and fear behaviour, but it remains unclear how the many biological components present within AMY interact to achieve these abilities. Building on previous work, we hypothesize that individual AMY nuclei represent different quantities and that fear conditioning arises from error-driven learning on the synapses between AMY nuclei. We present a computational model of AMY that (a) recreates the divisions and connections between AMY nuclei and their constituent pyramidal and inhibitory neurons; (b) accommodates scalable high-dimensional representations of external stimuli; (c) learns to associate complex stimuli with the presence (or absence) of an aversive stimulus; (d) preserves feature information when mapping inputs to salience estimates, such that these estimates generalize to similar stimuli; and (e) induces a diverse profile of neural responses within each nucleus. Our model predicts (1) defensive responses and neural activities in several experimental conditions, (2) the consequence of artificially ablating particular nuclei and (3) the tendency to generalize defensive responses to novel stimuli. We test these predictions by comparing model outputs to neural and behavioural data from animals and humans. Despite the relative simplicity of our model, we find significant overlap between simulated and empirical data, which supports our claim that the model captures many of the neural mechanisms that support fear conditioning. We conclude by comparing our model to other computational models and by characterizing the theoretical relationship between pattern separation and fear generalization in healthy versus anxious individuals.

Predictive learning by a burst-dependent learning rule

Humans and other animals are able to quickly generalize latent dynamics of spatiotemporal sequences, often from a minimal number of previous experiences. Additionally, internal representations of external stimuli must remain stable, even in the presence of sensory noise, in order to be useful for informing behavior. In contrast, typical machine learning approaches require many thousands of samples, and generalize poorly to unexperienced examples, or fail completely to predict at long timescales. Here, we propose a novel neural network module which incorporates hierarchy and recurrent feedback terms, constituting a simplified model of neocortical microcircuits. This microcircuit predicts spatiotemporal trajectories at the input layer using a temporal error minimization algorithm. We show that this module is able to predict with higher accuracy into the future compared to traditional models. Investigating this model we find that successive predictive models learn representations which are increasingly removed from the raw sensory space, namely as successive temporal derivatives of the positional information. Next, we introduce a spiking neural network model which implements the rate-model through the use of a recently proposed biological learning rule utilizing dual-compartment neurons. We show that this network performs well on the same tasks as the mean-field models, by developing intrinsic dynamics that follow the dynamics of the external stimulus, while coordinating transmission of higher-order dynamics. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that hierarchical temporal abstraction of sequences, rather than feed-forward reconstruction, may be responsible for the ability of neural systems to quickly adapt to novel situations.

Biologically-Based Computation: How Neural Details and Dynamics Are Suited for Implementing a Variety of Algorithms

The Neural Engineering Framework (Eliasmith & Anderson, 2003) is a long-standing method for implementing high-level algorithms constrained by low-level neurobiological details. In recent years, this method has been expanded to incorporate more biological details and applied to new tasks. This paper brings together these ongoing research strands, presenting them in a common framework. We expand on the NEF's core principles of (a) specifying the desired tuning curves of neurons in different parts of the model, (b) defining the computational relationships between the values represented by the neurons in different parts of the model, and (c) finding the synaptic connection weights that will cause those computations and tuning curves. In particular, we show how to extend this to include complex spatiotemporal tuning curves, and then apply this approach to produce functional computational models of grid cells, time cells, path integration, sparse representations, probabilistic representations, and symbolic representations in the brain.