1
|
Hussain S, Lafarga-Osuna Y, Ali M, Naseem U, Ahmed M, Tamez-Peña JG. Deep learning, radiomics and radiogenomics applications in the digital breast tomosynthesis: a systematic review. BMC Bioinformatics 2023; 24:401. [PMID: 37884877 PMCID: PMC10605943 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05515-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advancements in computing power and state-of-the-art algorithms have helped in more accessible and accurate diagnosis of numerous diseases. In addition, the development of de novo areas in imaging science, such as radiomics and radiogenomics, have been adding more to personalize healthcare to stratify patients better. These techniques associate imaging phenotypes with the related disease genes. Various imaging modalities have been used for years to diagnose breast cancer. Nonetheless, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a state-of-the-art technique, has produced promising results comparatively. DBT, a 3D mammography, is replacing conventional 2D mammography rapidly. This technological advancement is key to AI algorithms for accurately interpreting medical images. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS This paper presents a comprehensive review of deep learning (DL), radiomics and radiogenomics in breast image analysis. This review focuses on DBT, its extracted synthetic mammography (SM), and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Furthermore, this survey provides systematic knowledge about DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics for beginners and advanced-level researchers. RESULTS A total of 500 articles were identified, with 30 studies included as the set criteria. Parallel benchmarking of radiomics, radiogenomics, and DL models applied to the DBT images could allow clinicians and researchers alike to have greater awareness as they consider clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide to understanding the current state of early breast cancer detection using DBT images. CONCLUSION Using this survey, investigators with various backgrounds can easily seek interdisciplinary science and new DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics directions towards DBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadam Hussain
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
| | - Yareth Lafarga-Osuna
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Mansoor Ali
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Usman Naseem
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
| | - Masroor Ahmed
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jose Gerardo Tamez-Peña
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perillo T, de Giorgi M, Papace UM, Serino A, Cuocolo R, Manto A. Current role of machine learning and radiogenomics in precision neuro-oncology. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2023; 4:545-555. [PMID: 37720347 PMCID: PMC10501892 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly used to create tools that can enhance workflow in medicine. In particular, neuro-oncology has benefited from the use of AI and especially machine learning (ML) and radiogenomics, which are subfields of AI. ML can be used to develop algorithms that dynamically learn from available medical data in order to automatically do specific tasks. On the other hand, radiogenomics can identify relationships between tumor genetics and imaging features, thus possibly giving new insights into the pathophysiology of tumors. Therefore, ML and radiogenomics could help treatment tailoring, which is crucial in personalized neuro-oncology. The aim of this review is to illustrate current and possible future applications of ML and radiomics in neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Perillo
- Department of Neuroradiology, “Umberto I” Hospital, 84014 Norcera Inferiore, Italy
| | - Marco de Giorgi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Maria Papace
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonietta Serino
- Department of Neuroradiology, “Umberto I” Hospital, 84014 Norcera Inferiore, Italy
| | - Renato Cuocolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
| | - Andrea Manto
- Department of Neuroradiology, “Umberto I” Hospital, 84014 Norcera Inferiore, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen W, Sá RC, Bai Y, Napel S, Gevaert O, Lauderdale DS, Giger ML. Machine learning with multimodal data for COVID-19. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17934. [PMID: 37483733 PMCID: PMC10362086 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In response to the unprecedented global healthcare crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community has joined forces to tackle the challenges and prepare for future pandemics. Multiple modalities of data have been investigated to understand the nature of COVID-19. In this paper, MIDRC investigators present an overview of the state-of-the-art development of multimodal machine learning for COVID-19 and model assessment considerations for future studies. We begin with a discussion of the lessons learned from radiogenomic studies for cancer diagnosis. We then summarize the multi-modality COVID-19 data investigated in the literature including symptoms and other clinical data, laboratory tests, imaging, pathology, physiology, and other omics data. Publicly available multimodal COVID-19 data provided by MIDRC and other sources are summarized. After an overview of machine learning developments using multimodal data for COVID-19, we present our perspectives on the future development of multimodal machine learning models for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Chen
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, USA
| | - Rui C. Sá
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Yuntong Bai
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, USA
| | - Sandy Napel
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, USA
| | - Olivier Gevaert
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Department of Medicine and Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, USA
| | - Diane S. Lauderdale
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, USA
| | - Maryellen L. Giger
- Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC), USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown JS. Comparison of Oncogenes, Tumor Suppressors, and MicroRNAs Between Schizophrenia and Glioma: The Balance of Power. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 151:105206. [PMID: 37178944 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The risk of cancer in schizophrenia has been controversial. Confounders of the issue are cigarette smoking in schizophrenia, and antiproliferative effects of antipsychotic medications. The author has previously suggested comparison of a specific cancer like glioma to schizophrenia might help determine a more accurate relationship between cancer and schizophrenia. To accomplish this goal, the author performed three comparisons of data; the first a comparison of conventional tumor suppressors and oncogenes between schizophrenia and cancer including glioma. This comparison determined schizophrenia has both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting characteristics. A second, larger comparison between brain-expressed microRNAs in schizophrenia with their expression in glioma was then performed. This identified a core carcinogenic group of miRNAs in schizophrenia offset by a larger group of tumor-suppressive miRNAs. This proposed "balance of power" between oncogenes and tumor suppressors could cause neuroinflammation. This was assessed by a third comparison between schizophrenia, glioma and inflammation in asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma (ALRCM). This revealed that schizophrenia shares more oncogenic similarity to ALRCM than glioma.
Collapse
|
5
|
Papadomanolakis TN, Sergaki ES, Polydorou AA, Krasoudakis AG, Makris-Tsalikis GN, Polydorou AA, Afentakis NM, Athanasiou SA, Vardiambasis IO, Zervakis ME. Tumor Diagnosis against Other Brain Diseases Using T2 MRI Brain Images and CNN Binary Classifier and DWT. Brain Sci 2023; 13:348. [PMID: 36831891 PMCID: PMC9954603 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain tumors are diagnosed and classified manually and noninvasively by radiologists using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. The risk of misdiagnosis may exist due to human factors such as lack of time, fatigue, and relatively low experience. Deep learning methods have become increasingly important in MRI classification. To improve diagnostic accuracy, researchers emphasize the need to develop Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) computational diagnostics based on artificial intelligence (AI) systems by using deep learning methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and improving the performance of CNN by combining it with other data analysis tools such as wavelet transform. In this study, a novel diagnostic framework based on CNN and DWT data analysis is developed for the diagnosis of glioma tumors in the brain, among other tumors and other diseases, with T2-SWI MRI scans. It is a binary CNN classifier that treats the disease "glioma tumor" as positive and the other pathologies as negative, resulting in a very unbalanced binary problem. The study includes a comparative analysis of a CNN trained with wavelet transform data of MRIs instead of their pixel intensity values in order to demonstrate the increased performance of the CNN and DWT analysis in diagnosing brain gliomas. The results of the proposed CNN architecture are also compared with a deep CNN pre-trained on VGG16 transfer learning network and with the SVM machine learning method using DWT knowledge. METHODS To improve the accuracy of the CNN classifier, the proposed CNN model uses as knowledge the spatial and temporal features extracted by converting the original MRI images to the frequency domain by performing Discrete Wavelet Transformation (DWT), instead of the traditionally used original scans in the form of pixel intensities. Moreover, no pre-processing was applied to the original images. The images used are MRIs of type T2-SWI sequences parallel to the axial plane. Firstly, a compression step is applied for each MRI scan applying DWT up to three levels of decomposition. These data are used to train a 2D CNN in order to classify the scans as showing glioma or not. The proposed CNN model is trained on MRI slices originated from 382 various male and female adult patients, showing healthy and pathological images from a selection of diseases (showing glioma, meningioma, pituitary, necrosis, edema, non-enchasing tumor, hemorrhagic foci, edema, ischemic changes, cystic areas, etc.). The images are provided by the database of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) and the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) challenges on Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges 2016 and 2017, as well as by the numerous records kept in the public general hospital of Chania, Crete, "Saint George". RESULTS The proposed frameworks are experimentally evaluated by examining MRI slices originating from 190 different patients (not included in the training set), of which 56% are showing gliomas by the longest two axes less than 2 cm and 44% are showing other pathological effects or healthy cases. Results show convincing performance when using as information the spatial and temporal features extracted by the original scans. With the proposed CNN model and with data in DWT format, we achieved the following statistic percentages: accuracy 0.97, sensitivity (recall) 1, specificity 0.93, precision 0.95, FNR 0, and FPR 0.07. These numbers are higher for this data format (respectively: accuracy by 6% higher, recall by 11%, specificity by 7%, precision by 5%, FNR by 0.1%, and FPR is the same) than it would be, had we used as input data the intensity values of the MRIs (instead of the DWT analysis of the MRIs). Additionally, our study showed that when our CNN takes into account the TL of the existing network VGG, the performance values are lower, as follows: accuracy 0.87, sensitivity (recall) 0.91, specificity 0.84, precision 0.86, FNR of 0.08, and FPR 0.14. CONCLUSIONS The experimental results show the outperformance of the CNN, which is not based on transfer learning, but is using as information the MRI brain scans decomposed into DWT information instead of the pixel intensity of the original scans. The results are promising for the proposed CNN based on DWT knowledge to serve for binary diagnosis of glioma tumors among other tumors and diseases. Moreover, the SVM learning model using DWT data analysis performs with higher accuracy and sensitivity than using pixel values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleftheria S. Sergaki
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
| | - Andreas A. Polydorou
- Areteio Hospital, 2nd University Department of Surgery, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Alexios A. Polydorou
- Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos M. Afentakis
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 73133 Chania, Greece
| | - Sofia A. Athanasiou
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 73133 Chania, Greece
| | - Ioannis O. Vardiambasis
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 73133 Chania, Greece
| | - Michail E. Zervakis
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beyond Imaging and Genetic Signature in Glioblastoma: Radiogenomic Holistic Approach in Neuro-Oncology. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123205. [PMID: 36551961 PMCID: PMC9775324 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor exhibiting rapid and infiltrative growth, with less than 10% of patients surviving over 5 years, despite aggressive and multimodal treatments. The poor prognosis and the lack of effective pharmacological treatments are imputable to a remarkable histological and molecular heterogeneity of GBM, which has led, to date, to the failure of precision oncology and targeted therapies. Identification of molecular biomarkers is a paradigm for comprehensive and tailored treatments; nevertheless, biopsy sampling has proved to be invasive and limited. Radiogenomics is an emerging translational field of research aiming to study the correlation between radiographic signature and underlying gene expression. Although a research field still under development, not yet incorporated into routine clinical practice, it promises to be a useful non-invasive tool for future personalized/adaptive neuro-oncology. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the recent advancements in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiogenomics for the assessment of molecular markers of interest in GBM regarding prognosis and response to treatments, for monitoring recurrence, also providing insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for survival prognostication. Despite a high sensitivity and specificity in almost all studies, accuracy, reproducibility and clinical value of radiomic features are the Achilles heel of this newborn tool. Looking into the future, investigators' efforts should be directed towards standardization and a disciplined approach to data collection, algorithms, and statistical analysis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cao R, Tang L, Fang M, Zhong L, Wang S, Gong L, Li J, Dong D, Tian J. Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: applications and challenges. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac064. [PMID: 36457374 PMCID: PMC9707405 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors with high mortality. Accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions for GC rely heavily on human experts' careful judgments on medical images. However, the improvement of the accuracy is hindered by imaging conditions, limited experience, objective criteria, and inter-observer discrepancies. Recently, the developments of machine learning, especially deep-learning algorithms, have been facilitating computers to extract more information from data automatically. Researchers are exploring the far-reaching applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in various clinical practices, including GC. Herein, we aim to provide a broad framework to summarize current research on AI in GC. In the screening of GC, AI can identify precancerous diseases and assist in early cancer detection with endoscopic examination and pathological confirmation. In the diagnosis of GC, AI can support tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging and subtype classification. For treatment decisions, AI can help with surgical margin determination and prognosis prediction. Meanwhile, current approaches are challenged by data scarcity and poor interpretability. To tackle these problems, more regulated data, unified processing procedures, and advanced algorithms are urgently needed to build more accurate and robust AI models for GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mengjie Fang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lianzhen Zhong
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Siwen Wang
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lixin Gong
- College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China
| | - Jiazheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Radiology Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Di Dong
- Corresponding authors. Di Dong, CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, P. R. China. Tel: +86-13811833760; ; Jie Tian, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, P. R. China. Tel: +86-10-82618465;
| | - Jie Tian
- Corresponding authors. Di Dong, CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, P. R. China. Tel: +86-13811833760; ; Jie Tian, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, P. R. China. Tel: +86-10-82618465;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of Tumour Segmentation Accuracy on Efficacy of Quantitative MRI Biomarkers of Radiotherapy Outcome in Brain Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205133. [PMID: 36291917 PMCID: PMC9601104 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiotherapy is a major treatment option for patients with brain metastasis. However, response to radiotherapy is highly varied among the patients, and it may take months before the response of brain metastasis to radiotherapy is apparent on standard follow-up imaging. This is not desirable, especially given the fact that patients diagnosed with brain metastasis suffer from a short median survival. Recent studies have shown the high potential of machine learning methods for analyzing quantitative imaging features (biomarkers) to predict the response of brain metastasis before or early after radiotherapy. However, these methods require manual delineation of individual tumours on imaging that is tedious and time-consuming, hindering further development and widespread application of these techniques. Here, we investigated the impact of using less accurate but automatically generated tumour outlines on the efficacy of the derived imaging biomarkers for radiotherapy response prediction. Our findings demonstrate that while the effect of tumour delineation accuracy is considerable for automatic contours with low accuracy, imaging biomarkers and prediction models are rather robust to imperfections in the produced tumour masks. The results of this study open the avenue to utilizing automatically generated tumour contours for discovering imaging biomarkers without sacrificing their accuracy. Abstract Significantly affecting patients’ clinical course and quality of life, a growing number of cancer cases are diagnosed with brain metastasis (BM) annually. Stereotactic radiotherapy is now a major treatment option for patients with BM. However, it may take months before the local response of BM to stereotactic radiation treatment is apparent on standard follow-up imaging. While machine learning in conjunction with radiomics has shown great promise in predicting the local response of BM before or early after radiotherapy, further development and widespread application of such techniques has been hindered by their dependency on manual tumour delineation. In this study, we explored the impact of using less-accurate automatically generated segmentation masks on the efficacy of radiomic features for radiotherapy outcome prediction in BM. The findings of this study demonstrate that while the effect of tumour delineation accuracy is substantial for segmentation models with lower dice scores (dice score ≤ 0.85), radiomic features and prediction models are rather resilient to imperfections in the produced tumour masks. Specifically, the selected radiomic features (six shared features out of seven) and performance of the prediction model (accuracy of 80% versus 80%, AUC of 0.81 versus 0.78) were fairly similar for the ground-truth and automatically generated segmentation masks, with dice scores close to 0.90. The positive outcome of this work paves the way for adopting high-throughput automatically generated tumour masks for discovering diagnostic and prognostic imaging biomarkers in BM without sacrificing accuracy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pre-operative MRI radiomics model non-invasively predicts key genomic markers and survival in glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:253-263. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04150-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
10
|
Zhang L, Lv L, Li L, Wang YM, Zhao S, Miao L, Gao YN, Li M, Wu N. Radiomics Signature to Predict Prognosis in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma (≤3 cm) Patients with No Lymph Node Metastasis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081907. [PMID: 36010257 PMCID: PMC9406362 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the predictive ability of radiomics signature to predict the prognosis of early-stage primary lung adenocarcinoma (≤3 cm) with no lymph node metastasis (pathological stage I). Materials and Methods: This study included consecutive patients with lung adenocarcinoma (≤3 cm) with no lymph node metastasis (pathological stage I) and divided them into two groups: good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. The association between the radiomics signature and prognosis was explored. An integrative radiomics model was constructed to demonstrate the value of the radiomics signature for individualized prognostic prediction. Results: Six radiomics features were significantly different between the two prognosis groups and were used to construct a radiomics model. On the training and test sets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of the radiomics model in discriminating between the two groups were 0.946 and 0.888, respectively, and those of the pathological model were 0.761 and 0.798, respectively. A radiomics nomogram combining sex, tumor size and rad-score was built. Conclusion: The radiomics signature has potential utility in estimating the prognosis of patients with pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma (≤3 cm), potentially enabling a step forward in precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lv Lv
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yan-Mei Wang
- GE Healthcare China, Pudong New Town, Shanghai 201200, China
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Pediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Lei Miao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yan-Ning Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Meng Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
- Correspondence: (N.W.); (M.L.)
| | - Ning Wu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Langfang 065001, China
- Correspondence: (N.W.); (M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu M, Li S, Kuang Y, Hill VB, Heimberger AB, Zhai L, Zhai S. Artificial intelligence in the radiomic analysis of glioblastomas: A review, taxonomy, and perspective. Front Oncol 2022; 12:924245. [PMID: 35982952 PMCID: PMC9379255 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.924245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiological imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), are the standard-of-care non-invasive diagnostic approaches widely applied in neuro-oncology. Unfortunately, accurate interpretation of radiological imaging data is constantly challenged by the indistinguishable radiological image features shared by different pathological changes associated with tumor progression and/or various therapeutic interventions. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been widely applied in medical image processing and bioinformatics due to its advantages in implicit image feature extraction and integrative data analysis. Despite its recent rapid development, ML technology still faces many hurdles for its broader applications in neuro-oncological radiomic analysis, such as lack of large accessible standardized real patient radiomic brain tumor data of all kinds and reliable predictions on tumor response upon various treatments. Therefore, understanding ML-based AI technologies is critically important to help us address the skyrocketing demands of neuro-oncology clinical deployments. Here, we provide an overview on the latest advancements in ML techniques for brain tumor radiomic analysis, emphasizing proprietary and public dataset preparation and state-of-the-art ML models for brain tumor diagnosis, classifications (e.g., primary and secondary tumors), discriminations between treatment effects (pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis) and true progression, survival prediction, inflammation, and identification of brain tumor biomarkers. We also compare the key features of ML models in the realm of neuroradiology with ML models employed in other medical imaging fields and discuss open research challenges and directions for future work in this nascent precision medicine area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Sijia Li
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Yu Kuang
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Health Physics, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Virginia B. Hill
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Amy B. Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Lijie Zhai
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- *Correspondence: Lijie Zhai, ; Shengjie Zhai,
| | - Shengjie Zhai
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
- *Correspondence: Lijie Zhai, ; Shengjie Zhai,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MP, Mohan S, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data 2022; 9:453. [PMID: 35906241 PMCID: PMC9338035 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive adult brain tumor. Numerous studies have reported results from either private institutional data or publicly available datasets. However, current public datasets are limited in terms of: a) number of subjects, b) lack of consistent acquisition protocol, c) data quality, or d) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information. Toward alleviating these limitations, we contribute the "University of Pennsylvania Glioblastoma Imaging, Genomics, and Radiomics" (UPenn-GBM) dataset, which describes the currently largest publicly available comprehensive collection of 630 patients diagnosed with de novo glioblastoma. The UPenn-GBM dataset includes (a) advanced multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired during routine clinical practice, at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, (b) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information, (d) perfusion and diffusion derivative volumes, (e) computationally-derived and manually-revised expert annotations of tumor sub-regions, as well as (f) quantitative imaging (also known as radiomic) features corresponding to each of these regions. This collection describes our contribution towards repeatable, reproducible, and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Natali Flores Santamaría
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Parker
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zissimos Mourelatos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher D Watt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Caramanti R, Aprígio RM, D`Aglio Rocha CE, Morais DF, Góes MJ, Chaddad-Neto F, Tognola WA. Is Edema Zone Volume Associated With Ki-67 Index in Glioblastoma Patients? Cureus 2022; 14:e24246. [PMID: 35602791 PMCID: PMC9116516 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
14
|
Corr F, Grimm D, Saß B, Pojskić M, Bartsch JW, Carl B, Nimsky C, Bopp MHA. Radiogenomic Predictors of Recurrence in Glioblastoma—A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030402. [PMID: 35330402 PMCID: PMC8952807 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, as the most aggressive brain tumor, is associated with a poor prognosis and outcome. To optimize prognosis and clinical therapy decisions, there is an urgent need to stratify patients with increased risk for recurrent tumors and low therapeutic success to optimize individual treatment. Radiogenomics establishes a link between radiological and pathological information. This review provides a state-of-the-art picture illustrating the latest developments in the use of radiogenomic markers regarding prognosis and their potential for monitoring recurrence. Databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched. Inclusion criteria were defined as diagnosis of glioblastoma with histopathological and radiological follow-up. Out of 321 reviewed articles, 43 articles met these inclusion criteria. Included studies were analyzed for the frequency of radiological and molecular tumor markers whereby radiogenomic associations were analyzed. Six main associations were described: radiogenomic prognosis, MGMT status, IDH, EGFR status, molecular subgroups, and tumor location. Prospective studies analyzing prognostic features of glioblastoma together with radiological features are lacking. By reviewing the progress in the development of radiogenomic markers, we provide insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for clinical routine use eventually enabling early identification of glioblastoma recurrence and therefore supporting a further personalized monitoring and treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Corr
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- EDU Institute of Higher Education, Villa Bighi, Chaplain’s House, KKR 1320 Kalkara, Malta
- Correspondence:
| | - Dustin Grimm
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- EDU Institute of Higher Education, Villa Bighi, Chaplain’s House, KKR 1320 Kalkara, Malta
| | - Benjamin Saß
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
| | - Mirza Pojskić
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
| | - Jörg W. Bartsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Carl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Christopher Nimsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Miriam H. A. Bopp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aftab K, Aamir FB, Mallick S, Mubarak F, Pope WB, Mikkelsen T, Rock JP, Enam SA. Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2022; 156:217-231. [PMID: 35020109 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03933-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Being the most common primary brain tumor, glioblastoma presents as an extremely challenging malignancy to treat with dismal outcomes despite treatment. Varying molecular epidemiology of glioblastoma between patients and intra-tumoral heterogeneity explains the failure of current one-size-fits-all treatment modalities. Radiomics uses machine learning to identify salient features of the tumor on brain imaging and promises patient-specific management in glioblastoma patients. METHODS We performed a comprehensive review of the available literature on studies investigating the role of radiomics and radiogenomics models for the diagnosis, stratification, prognostication as well as treatment planning and monitoring of glioblastoma. RESULTS Classifiers based on a combination of various MRI sequences, genetic information and clinical data can predict non-invasive tumor diagnosis, overall survival and treatment response with reasonable accuracy. However, the use of radiomics for glioblastoma treatment remains in infancy as larger sample sizes, standardized image acquisition and data extraction techniques are needed to develop machine learning models that can be translated effectively into clinical practice. CONCLUSION Radiomics has the potential to transform the scope of glioblastoma management through personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Aftab
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Saad Mallick
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Fatima Mubarak
- Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tom Mikkelsen
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jack P Rock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Syed Ather Enam
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, Saxena S, Bagheri S, Guo J, Chawla S, Nabavizadeh A, Mohan S, Bakas S, Davatzikos C, Nasrallah MP. Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235921. [PMID: 34885031 PMCID: PMC8656630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care. Abstract Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stephen J. Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang B, Zhang S, Wu X, Li Y, Yan Y, Liu L, Xiang J, Li D, Yan T. Multiple Survival Outcome Prediction of Glioblastoma Patients Based on Multiparametric MRI. Front Oncol 2021; 11:778627. [PMID: 34900728 PMCID: PMC8655336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.778627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Construction of radiomics models for the individualized estimation of multiple survival stratification in glioblastoma (GBM) patients using the multiregional information extracted from multiparametric MRI that could facilitate clinical decision-making for GBM patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 134 eligible GBM patients were selected from The Cancer Genome Atlas. These patients were separated into the long-term and short-term survival groups according to the median of individual survival indicators: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Then, the patients were divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 2:1. Radiomics features (n = 5,152) were extracted from multiple regions of the GBM using multiparametric MRI. Then, radiomics signatures that are related to the three survival indicators were respectively constructed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for each patient in the training set. Based on a Cox proportional hazards model, the radiomics model was further constructed by combining the signature and clinical risk factors. RESULTS The constructed radiomics model showed a promising discrimination ability to differentiate in the training set and validation set of GBM patients with survival indicators of OS, PFS, and DSS. Both the four MRI modalities and five tumor subregions have different effects on the three survival indicators of GBM. The favorable calibration and decision curve analysis indicated the clinical decision value of the radiomics model. The performance of models of the three survival indicators was different but excellent; the best model achieved C indexes of 0.725, 0.677, and 0.724, respectively, in the validation set. CONCLUSION Our results show that the proposed radiomics models have favorable predictive accuracy on three survival indicators and can provide individualized probabilities of survival stratification for GBM patients by using multiparametric and multiregional MRI features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Wang
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Shan Zhang
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xubin Wu
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ying Li
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yueming Yan
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lili Liu
- Department of Pathology & Shanxi Translational Medicine Research Center on Esophageal Cancer, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jie Xiang
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Dandan Li
- College of Information and Computer, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ting Yan
- Department of Pathology & Shanxi Translational Medicine Research Center on Esophageal Cancer, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ak M, Toll SA, Hein KZ, Colen RR, Khatua S. Evolving Role and Translation of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Adult and Pediatric Neuro-Oncology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 43:792-801. [PMID: 34649914 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Exponential technologic advancements in imaging, high-performance computing, and artificial intelligence, in addition to increasing access to vast amounts of diverse data, have revolutionized the role of imaging in medicine. Radiomics is defined as a high-throughput feature-extraction method that unlocks microscale quantitative data hidden within standard-of-care medical imaging. Radiogenomics is defined as the linkage between imaging and genomics information. Multiple radiomics and radiogenomics studies performed on conventional and advanced neuro-oncology image modalities show that they have the potential to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, classify tumor subgroups, and predict recurrence, survival, and mutation status with high accuracy. In this article, we outline the technical steps involved in radiomics and radiogenomics analyses with the use of artificial intelligence methods and review current applications in adult and pediatric neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ak
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A., R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Hillman Cancer Center (M.A., R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - S A Toll
- Department of Hematology-Oncology (S.A.T.), Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan
| | - K Z Hein
- Department of Leukemia (K.Z.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - R R Colen
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A., R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Hillman Cancer Center (M.A., R.R.C.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - S Khatua
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology (S.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shiri I, Maleki H, Hajianfar G, Abdollahi H, Ashrafinia S, Hatt M, Zaidi H, Oveisi M, Rahmim A. Next-Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:1132-1148. [PMID: 32185618 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01487-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Considerable progress has been made in the assessment and management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on mutation status in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS). At the same time, NSCLC management through KRAS and EGFR mutation profiling faces challenges. In the present work, we aimed to evaluate a comprehensive radiomics framework that enabled prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients based on radiomic features from low-dose computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced diagnostic quality CT (CTD), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modalities and use of machine learning algorithms. METHODS Our study involved NSCLC patients including 150 PET, low-dose CT, and CTD images. Radiomic features from original and preprocessed (including 64 bin discretizing, Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LOG), and Wavelet) images were extracted. Conventional clinically used standard uptake value (SUV) parameters and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were also obtained from PET images. Highly correlated features were pre-eliminated, and false discovery rate (FDR) correction was performed with the resulting q-values reported for univariate analysis. Six feature selection methods and 12 classifiers were then used for multivariate prediction of gene mutation status (provided by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) in patients. We performed 10-fold cross-validation for model tuning to improve robustness, and our developed models were assessed on an independent validation set with 68 patients (common in all three imaging modalities). The average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was utilized for performance evaluation. RESULTS The best predictive power for conventional PET parameters was achieved by SUVpeak (AUC 0.69, p value = 0.0002) and MTV (AUC 0.55, p value = 0.0011) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Univariate analysis of extracted radiomics features improved AUC performance to 0.75 (q-value 0.003, Short-Run Emphasis feature of GLRLM from LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma value 1.5) and 0.71 (q-value 0.00005, Large Dependence Low Gray-Level Emphasis feature of GLDM in LOG preprocessed image of CTD with sigma value 5) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate machine learning-based AUC performances were significantly improved to 0.82 for EGFR (LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma 3 with variance threshold (VT) feature selector and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) classifier (q-value = 4.86E-05) and 0.83 for KRAS (LOG preprocessed image of CT with sigma 3.5 with select model (SM) feature selector and SGD classifier (q-value = 2.81E-09). CONCLUSION Our work demonstrated that non-invasive and reliable radiomics analysis can be successfully used to predict EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients. We demonstrated that radiomic features extracted from different image-feature sets could be used for EGFR and KRAS mutation status prediction in NSCLC patients and showed improved predictive power relative to conventional image-derived metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Shiri
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | - Hasan Maleki
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghasem Hajianfar
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | - Hamid Abdollahi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.,Department of Radiologic Sciences and Medical Physics, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Saeed Ashrafinia
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mathieu Hatt
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Univ Brest, Brest, France
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.,Geneva University Neurocenter, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mehrdad Oveisi
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoshino I, Yokota H. Radiogenomics of gastroenterological cancer: The dawn of personalized medicine with artificial intelligence-based image analysis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:427-435. [PMID: 34337291 PMCID: PMC8316732 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiogenomics is a new field of medical science that integrates two omics, radiomics and genomics, and may bring a major paradigm shift in traditional personalized medicine strategies that require tumor tissue samples. In addition, the acquisition of the data does not require special imaging equipment or special imaging conditions, and it is possible to use image information from computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography in clinical practice, so the versatility and cost-effectiveness of radiogenomics are expected. So far, the field of radiogenomics has developed, especially in the fields of brain tumors and breast cancer, but recently, reports of radiogenomic research on gastroenterological cancer are increasing. This review provides an overview of radiogenomic research methods and summarizes the current radiogenomic research in gastroenterological cancer. In addition, the application of artificial intelligence is considered to be indispensable for the integrated analysis of enormous omics information in the future, and the future direction of this research, including the latest technologies, will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isamu Hoshino
- Division of Gastroenterological SurgeryChiba Cancer CenterChibaJapan
| | - Hajime Yokota
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation OncologyGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lu L, Sun SH, Yang H, E L, Guo P, Schwartz LH, Zhao B. Radiomics Prediction of EGFR Status in Lung Cancer-Our Experience in Using Multiple Feature Extractors and The Cancer Imaging Archive Data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:223-230. [PMID: 32548300 PMCID: PMC7289249 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the performance of multiple radiomics feature extractors/software on predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in 228 patients with non–small cell lung cancer from publicly available data sets in The Cancer Imaging Archive. The imaging and clinical data were split into training (n = 105) and validation cohorts (n = 123). Two of the most cited open-source feature extractors, IBEX (1563 features) and Pyradiomics (1319 features), and our in-house software, Columbia Image Feature Extractor (CIFE) (1160 features), were used to extract radiomics features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed sequentially to predict EGFR mutation status using each individual feature extractor. Our univariate analysis integrated an unsupervised clustering method to identify nonredundant and informative candidate features for the creation of prediction models by multivariate analyses. In training, unsupervised clustering-based univariate analysis identified 5, 6, and 4 features from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE as candidate features, respectively. Multivariate prediction models using these features from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE yielded similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.68, 0.67, and 0.69. However, in validation, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of multivariate prediction models from IBEX, Pyradiomics, and CIFE decreased to 0.54, 0.56 and 0.64, respectively. Different feature extractors select different radiomics features, which leads to prediction models with varying performance. However, correlation between those selected features from different extractors may indicate these features measure similar imaging phenotypes associated with similar biological characteristics. Overall, attention should be paid to the generalizability of individual radiomics features and radiomics prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Lu
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Shawn H Sun
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Linning E
- Department of Radiology, Shanxi DAYI Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Pingzhen Guo
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Smedley NF, Aberle DR, Hsu W. Using deep neural networks and interpretability methods to identify gene expression patterns that predict radiomic features and histology in non-small cell lung cancer. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021; 8:031906. [PMID: 33977113 PMCID: PMC8105647 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.3.031906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Integrative analysis combining diagnostic imaging and genomic information can uncover biological insights into lesions that are visible on radiologic images. We investigate techniques for interrogating a deep neural network trained to predict quantitative image (radiomic) features and histology from gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approach: Using 262 training and 89 testing cases from two public datasets, deep feedforward neural networks were trained to predict the values of 101 computed tomography (CT) radiomic features and histology. A model interrogation method called gene masking was used to derive the learned associations between subsets of genes and a radiomic feature or histology class [adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous cell, and other]. Results: Overall, neural networks outperformed other classifiers. In testing, neural networks classified histology with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.86 (ADC), 0.91 (squamous cell), and 0.71 (other). Classification performance of radiomics features ranged from 0.42 to 0.89 AUC. Gene masking analysis revealed new and previously reported associations. For example, hypoxia genes predicted histology ( > 0.90 AUC ). Previously published gene signatures for classifying histology were also predictive in our model ( > 0.80 AUC ). Gene sets related to the immune or cardiac systems and cell development processes were predictive ( > 0.70 AUC ) of several different radiomic features. AKT signaling, tumor necrosis factor, and Rho gene sets were each predictive of tumor textures. Conclusions: This work demonstrates neural networks' ability to map gene expressions to radiomic features and histology types in NSCLC and to interpret the models to identify predictive genes associated with each feature or type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nova F Smedley
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.,University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Denise R Aberle
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.,University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - William Hsu
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.,University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, California, United States.,University of California, Los Angeles, Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, Los Angeles, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The 2016 World Health Organization brain tumor classification is based on genomic and molecular profile of tumor tissue. These characteristics have improved understanding of the brain tumor and played an important role in treatment planning and prognostication. There is an ongoing effort to develop noninvasive imaging techniques that provide insight into tissue characteristics at the cellular and molecular levels. This article focuses on the molecular characteristics of gliomas, transcriptomic subtypes, and radiogenomic studies using semantic and radiomic features. The limitations and future directions of radiogenomics as a standalone diagnostic tool also are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, BSH 5056, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Sangam Kanekar
- Department of Radiology and Neurology, Division of Neuroradiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton Hershey Medical Center, Mail Code H066 500, University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huizer K, Zhu C, Chirifi I, Krist B, Zorgman D, van der Weiden M, van den Bosch TPP, Dumas J, Cheng C, Kros JM, Mustafa DA. Periostin Is Expressed by Pericytes and Is Crucial for Angiogenesis in Glioma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2021; 79:863-872. [PMID: 32647861 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The expression of the matricellular protein periostin has been associated with glioma progression. In previous work we found an association of periostin with glioma angiogenesis. Here, we screen gliomas for POSTN expression and identify the cells that express periostin in human gliomas. In addition, we study the role of periostin in an in vitro model for angiogenesis. The expression of periostin was investigated by RT-PCR and by immunohistochemistry. In addition, we used double labeling and in situ RNA techniques to identify the expressing cells. To investigate the function of periostin, we silenced POSTN in a 3D in vitro angiogenesis model. Periostin expression was elevated in pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma, but not in grade II/III astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. The expression of periostin colocalized with PDGFRβ+ cells, but not with OLIG2+/SOX2+ glioma stem cells. Silencing of periostin in pericytes in coculture experiments resulted in attenuation of the numbers and the length of the vessels formation and in a decrease in endothelial junction formation. We conclude that pericytes are the main source of periostin in human gliomas and that periostin plays an essential role in the growth and branching of blood vessels. Therefore, periostin should be explored as a novel target for developing anti-angiogenic therapy for glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Huizer
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Changbin Zhu
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ihsan Chirifi
- Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Krist
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Zorgman
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel van der Weiden
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry P P van den Bosch
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Dumas
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Cheng
- Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan M Kros
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dana A Mustafa
- From the Laboratory for Tumor Immunopathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rathore S, Mohan S, Bakas S, Sako C, Badve C, Pati S, Singh A, Bounias D, Ngo P, Akbari H, Gastounioti A, Bergman M, Bilello M, Shinohara RT, Yushkevich P, O'Rourke DM, Sloan AE, Kontos D, Nasrallah MP, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davatzikos C. Multi-institutional noninvasive in vivo characterization of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII in glioma using neuro-Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (neuro-CaPTk). Neurooncol Adv 2021; 2:iv22-iv34. [PMID: 33521638 PMCID: PMC7829474 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gliomas represent a biologically heterogeneous group of primary brain tumors with uncontrolled cellular proliferation and diffuse infiltration that renders them almost incurable, thereby leading to a grim prognosis. Recent comprehensive genomic profiling has greatly elucidated the molecular hallmarks of gliomas, including the mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2), loss of chromosomes 1p and 19q (1p/19q), and epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII). Detection of these molecular alterations is based on ex vivo analysis of surgically resected tissue specimen that sometimes is not adequate for testing and/or does not capture the spatial tumor heterogeneity of the neoplasm. Methods We developed a method for noninvasive detection of radiogenomic markers of IDH both in lower-grade gliomas (WHO grade II and III tumors) and glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), 1p/19q in IDH-mutant lower-grade gliomas, and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma. Preoperative MRIs of 473 glioma patients from 3 of the studies participating in the ReSPOND consortium (collection I: Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania [HUP: n = 248], collection II: The Cancer Imaging Archive [TCIA; n = 192], and collection III: Ohio Brain Tumor Study [OBTS, n = 33]) were collected. Neuro-Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (neuro-CaPTk), a modular platform available for cancer imaging analytics and machine learning, was leveraged to extract histogram, shape, anatomical, and texture features from delineated tumor subregions and to integrate these features using support vector machine to generate models predictive of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII. The models were validated using 3 configurations: (1) 70-30% training-testing splits or 10-fold cross-validation within individual collections, (2) 70-30% training-testing splits within merged collections, and (3) training on one collection and testing on another. Results These models achieved a classification accuracy of 86.74% (HUP), 85.45% (TCIA), and 75.15% (TCIA) in identifying EGFRvIII, IDH, and 1p/19q, respectively, in configuration I. The model, when applied on combined data in configuration II, yielded a classification success rate of 82.50% in predicting IDH mutation (HUP + TCIA + OBTS). The model when trained on TCIA dataset yielded classification accuracy of 84.88% in predicting IDH in HUP dataset. Conclusions Using machine learning algorithms, high accuracy was achieved in the prediction of IDH, 1p/19q, and EGFRvIII mutation. Neuro-CaPTk encompasses all the pipelines required to replicate these analyses in multi-institutional settings and could also be used for other radio(geno)mic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chaitra Badve
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashish Singh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dimitrios Bounias
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Phuc Ngo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aimilia Gastounioti
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul Yushkevich
- Penn Image Computing and Science Lab (PICSL), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Otazo R, Lambin P, Pignol JP, Ladd ME, Schlemmer HP, Baumann M, Hricak H. MRI-guided Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Paradigm in Adaptive Radiation Oncology. Radiology 2020; 298:248-260. [PMID: 33350894 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) continues to be one of the mainstays of cancer treatment. Considerable efforts have been recently devoted to integrating MRI into clinical RT planning and monitoring. This integration, known as MRI-guided RT, has been motivated by the superior soft-tissue contrast, organ motion visualization, and ability to monitor tumor and tissue physiologic changes provided by MRI compared with CT. Offline MRI is already used for treatment planning at many institutions. Furthermore, MRI-guided linear accelerator systems, allowing use of MRI during treatment, enable improved adaptation to anatomic changes between RT fractions compared with CT guidance. Efforts are underway to develop real-time MRI-guided intrafraction adaptive RT of tumors affected by motion and MRI-derived biomarkers to monitor treatment response and potentially adapt treatment to physiologic changes. These developments in MRI guidance provide the basis for a paradigm change in treatment planning, monitoring, and adaptation. Key challenges to advancing MRI-guided RT include real-time volumetric anatomic imaging, addressing image distortion because of magnetic field inhomogeneities, reproducible quantitative imaging across different MRI systems, and biologic validation of quantitative imaging. This review describes emerging innovations in offline and online MRI-guided RT, exciting opportunities they offer for advancing research and clinical care, hurdles to be overcome, and the need for multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Otazo
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Philippe Lambin
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Mark E Ladd
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Michael Baumann
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- From the Departments of Medical Physics (R.O.) and Radiology (R.O., H.H.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (P.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (J.P.P.); Divisions of Medical Physics in Radiology (M.E.L.), Radiology (H.P.S.), and Radiation Oncology/Radiobiology (M.B.), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (M.E.L.) and Faculty of Medicine (M.E.L., M.B.), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; and OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pati S, Verma R, Akbari H, Bilello M, Hill VB, Sako C, Correa R, Beig N, Venet L, Thakur S, Serai P, Ha SM, Blake GD, Shinohara RT, Tiwari P, Bakas S. Reproducibility analysis of multi-institutional paired expert annotations and radiomic features of the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) dataset. Med Phys 2020; 47:6039-6052. [PMID: 33118182 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The availability of radiographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) has opened up opportunities for development of radiomic markers for prognostic/predictive applications in glioblastoma (GBM). In this work, we address two critical challenges with regard to developing robust radiomic approaches: (a) the lack of availability of reliable segmentation labels for glioblastoma tumor sub-compartments (i.e., enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor core, peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissue) and (b) identifying "reproducible" radiomic features that are robust to segmentation variability across readers/sites. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS From TCIA's Ivy GAP cohort, we obtained a paired set (n = 31) of expert annotations approved by two board-certified neuroradiologists at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU). For these studies, we performed a reproducibility study that assessed the variability in (a) segmentation labels and (b) radiomic features, between these paired annotations. The radiomic variability was assessed on a comprehensive panel of 11 700 radiomic features including intensity, volumetric, morphologic, histogram-based, and textural parameters, extracted for each of the paired sets of annotations. Our results demonstrated (a) a high level of inter-rater agreement (median value of DICE ≥0.8 for all sub-compartments), and (b) ≈24% of the extracted radiomic features being highly correlated (based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) to annotation variations. These robust features largely belonged to morphology (describing shape characteristics), intensity (capturing intensity profile statistics), and COLLAGE (capturing heterogeneity in gradient orientations) feature families. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES We make publicly available on TCIA's Analysis Results Directory (https://doi.org/10.7937/9j41-7d44), the complete set of (a) multi-institutional expert annotations for the tumor sub-compartments, (b) 11 700 radiomic features, and (c) the associated reproducibility meta-analysis. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS The annotations and the associated meta-data for Ivy GAP are released with the purpose of enabling researchers toward developing image-based biomarkers for prognostic/predictive applications in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ruchika Verma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Virginia B Hill
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ramon Correa
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Niha Beig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Ludovic Venet
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Siddhesh Thakur
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Prashant Serai
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Geri D Blake
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Russell Taki Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Penn Statistical Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Beig N, Bera K, Tiwari P. Introduction to radiomics and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology: implications and challenges. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:iv3-iv14. [PMID: 33521636 PMCID: PMC7829475 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuro-oncology largely consists of malignancies of the brain and central nervous system including both primary as well as metastatic tumors. Currently, a significant clinical challenge in neuro-oncology is to tailor therapies for patients based on a priori knowledge of their survival outcome or treatment response to conventional or experimental therapies. Radiomics or the quantitative extraction of subvisual data from conventional radiographic imaging has recently emerged as a powerful data-driven approach to offer insights into clinically relevant questions related to diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, as well as assessing treatment response. Furthermore, radiogenomic approaches provide a mechanism to establish statistical correlations of radiomic features with point mutations and next-generation sequencing data to further leverage the potential of routine MRI scans to serve as "virtual biopsy" maps. In this review, we provide an introduction to radiomic and radiogenomic approaches in neuro-oncology, including a brief description of the workflow involving preprocessing, tumor segmentation, and extraction of "hand-crafted" features from the segmented region of interest, as well as identifying radiogenomic associations that could ultimately lead to the development of reliable prognostic and predictive models in neuro-oncology applications. Lastly, we discuss the promise of radiomics and radiogenomic approaches in personalizing treatment decisions in neuro-oncology, as well as the challenges with clinical adoption, which will rely heavily on their demonstrated resilience to nonstandardization in imaging protocols across sites and scanners, as well as in their ability to demonstrate reproducibility across large multi-institutional cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niha Beig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaustav Bera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wan Y, Rahmat R, Price SJ. Deep learning for glioblastoma segmentation using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identifies volumetric features associated with survival. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:3067-3080. [PMID: 32662042 PMCID: PMC7593295 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04483-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of volumetric features is challenging in glioblastoma. We investigate whether volumetric features derived from preoperative MRI using a convolutional neural network-assisted segmentation is correlated with survival. METHODS Preoperative MRI of 120 patients were scored using Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images (VASARI) features. We trained and tested a multilayer, multi-scale convolutional neural network on multimodal brain tumour segmentation challenge (BRATS) data, prior to testing on our dataset. The automated labels were manually edited to generate ground truth segmentations. Network performance for our data and BRATS data was compared. Multivariable Cox regression analysis corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate was performed to correlate clinical and imaging variables with overall survival. RESULTS Median Dice coefficients in our sample were (1) whole tumour 0.94 (IQR, 0.82-0.98) compared to 0.91 (IQR, 0.83-0.94 p = 0.012), (2) FLAIR region 0.84 (IQR, 0.63-0.95) compared to 0.81 (IQR, 0.69-0.8 p = 0.170), (3) contrast-enhancing region 0.91 (IQR, 0.74-0.98) compared to 0.83 (IQR, 0.78-0.89 p = 0.003) and (4) necrosis region were 0.82 (IQR, 0.47-0.97) compared to 0.67 (IQR, 0.42-0.81 p = 0.005). Contrast-enhancing region/tumour core ratio (HR 4.73 [95% CI, 1.67-13.40], corrected p = 0.017) and necrotic core/tumour core ratio (HR 8.13 [95% CI, 2.06-32.12], corrected p = 0.011) were independently associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Semi-automated segmentation of glioblastoma using a convolutional neural network trained on independent data is robust when applied to routine clinical data. The segmented volumes have prognostic significance.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bian T, Wu Z, Lin Q, Wang H, Ge Y, Duan S, Fu G, Cui C, Su X. Radiomic signatures derived from multiparametric MRI for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200287. [PMID: 32822542 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the ability of radiomic signatures based on MRI to evaluate the response and efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for treating breast cancers. Methods: 152 patients were included in this study at our institution between March 2017 and September 2019. All patients with breast cancer underwent a preoperative breast MRI and the Miller–Payne grading system was applied to evaluate response to NAC. Quantitative parameters were compared between patients with sensitive and insensitive responses to NAC and between those with pathological complete responses (pCR) and non-pCR. Four radiomic signatures were built based on T2W imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and their combination, and radiomics scores (Rad-score) were calculated. The combination of the clinical factors and Rad-scores created a nomogram model. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between MRI features and independent clinical risk factors. Results: 20 features and 18 features were selected to build the radiomic signature for evaluating sensitivity and the possibility of pCR, respectively. The combined radiomic signature and nomogram model showed a similar discrimination in the training (AUC 0.91, 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96, 0.86–0.98) and validation (AUC 0.93, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86–1.00, 0.82–1.00) sets. The clinical factor model exhibited reduced performance (AUC 0.74, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.64–0.84, 0.46–0.82) in terms of NAC sensitivity and pCR. Conclusions: The combined radiomic signature and nomogram model exhibited potential predictive power for predicting effective NAC treatment which can aid in the prognosis and guidance of treatment regimens. Advances in knowledge: Identifying a means of assessing the efficacy of NAC before surgery can guide follow-up treatment and avoid chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Bian
- Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Zengjie Wu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Haibo Wang
- Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Yaqiong Ge
- GE Healthcare, Pudong, 210000, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Guangming Fu
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Chunxiao Cui
- Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaohui Su
- Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Smedley NF, El-Saden S, Hsu W. Discovering and interpreting transcriptomic drivers of imaging traits using neural networks. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:3537-3548. [PMID: 32101278 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Cancer heterogeneity is observed at multiple biological levels. To improve our understanding of these differences and their relevance in medicine, approaches to link organ- and tissue-level information from diagnostic images and cellular-level information from genomics are needed. However, these 'radiogenomic' studies often use linear or shallow models, depend on feature selection, or consider one gene at a time to map images to genes. Moreover, no study has systematically attempted to understand the molecular basis of imaging traits based on the interpretation of what the neural network has learned. These studies are thus limited in their ability to understand the transcriptomic drivers of imaging traits, which could provide additional context for determining clinical outcomes. RESULTS We present a neural network-based approach that takes high-dimensional gene expression data as input and performs non-linear mapping to an imaging trait. To interpret the models, we propose gene masking and gene saliency to extract learned relationships from radiogenomic neural networks. In glioblastoma patients, our models outperformed comparable classifiers (>0.10 AUC) and our interpretation methods were validated using a similar model to identify known relationships between genes and molecular subtypes. We found that tumor imaging traits had specific transcription patterns, e.g. edema and genes related to cellular invasion, and 10 radiogenomic traits were significantly predictive of survival. We demonstrate that neural networks can model transcriptomic heterogeneity to reflect differences in imaging and can be used to derive radiogenomic traits with clinical value. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION https://github.com/novasmedley/deepRadiogenomics. CONTACT whsu@mednet.ucla.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nova F Smedley
- Medical & Imaging Informatics.,Department of Radiological Sciences.,Department of Bioengineering
| | - Suzie El-Saden
- Medical & Imaging Informatics.,Department of Radiological Sciences
| | - William Hsu
- Medical & Imaging Informatics.,Department of Radiological Sciences.,Department of Bioengineering.,Bioinformatics IDP, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chelebian E, Fuster-Garcia E, Álvarez-Torres MDM, Juan-Albarracín J, García-Gómez JM. Higher vascularity at infiltrated peripheral edema differentiates proneural glioblastoma subtype. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232500. [PMID: 33052913 PMCID: PMC7556526 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Genetic classifications are crucial for understanding the heterogeneity of glioblastoma. Recently, perfusion MRI techniques have demonstrated associations molecular alterations. In this work, we investigated whether perfusion markers within infiltrated peripheral edema were associated with proneural, mesenchymal, classical and neural subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS ONCOhabitats open web services were used to obtain the cerebral blood volume at the infiltrated peripheral edema for MRI studies of 50 glioblastoma patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive: TCGA-GBM. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were carried out in order to assess the association between vascular features and the Verhaak subtypes. For assessing specific differences, Mann-Whitney U-test was conducted. Finally, the association of overall survival with molecular and vascular features was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox models. RESULTS ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests for the maximum cerebral blood volume at the infiltrated peripheral edema between the four subclasses yielded false discovery rate corrected p-values of <0.001 and 0.02, respectively. This vascular feature was significantly higher (p = 0.0043) in proneural patients compared to the rest of the subtypes while conducting Mann-Whitney U-test. The multivariate Cox model pointed to redundant information provided by vascular features at the peripheral edema and proneural subtype when analyzing overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Higher relative cerebral blood volume at infiltrated peripheral edema is associated with proneural glioblastoma subtype suggesting underlying vascular behavior related to molecular composition in that area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Chelebian
- Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.,Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - María Del Mar Álvarez-Torres
- Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
| | - Javier Juan-Albarracín
- Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
| | - Juan M García-Gómez
- Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Oltra-Sastre M, Fuster-Garcia E, Juan-Albarracin J, Sáez C, Perez-Girbes A, Sanz-Requena R, Revert-Ventura A, Mocholi A, Urchueguia J, Hervas A, Reynes G, Font-de-Mora J, Muñoz-Langa J, Botella C, Aparici F, Marti-Bonmati L, Garcia-Gomez JM. Multi-parametric MR Imaging Biomarkers Associated to Clinical Outcomes in Gliomas: A Systematic Review. Curr Med Imaging 2020; 15:933-947. [PMID: 32008521 DOI: 10.2174/1573405615666190109100503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review evidence regarding the association of multiparametric biomarkers with clinical outcomes and their capacity to explain relevant subcompartments of gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Scopus database was searched for original journal papers from January 1st, 2007 to February 20th, 2017 according to PRISMA. Four hundred forty-nine abstracts of papers were reviewed and scored independently by two out of six authors. Based on those papers we analyzed associations between biomarkers, subcompartments within the tumor lesion, and clinical outcomes. From all the articles analyzed, the twenty-seven papers with the highest scores were highlighted to represent the evidence about MR imaging biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes. Similarly, eighteen studies defining subcompartments within the tumor region were also highlighted to represent the evidence of MR imaging biomarkers. Their reports were critically appraised according to the QUADAS-2 criteria. RESULTS It has been demonstrated that multi-parametric biomarkers are prepared for surrogating diagnosis, grading, segmentation, overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence, molecular profiling and response to treatment in gliomas. Quantifications and radiomics features obtained from morphological exams (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1c), PWI (including DSC and DCE), diffusion (DWI, DTI) and chemical shift imaging (CSI) are the preferred MR biomarkers associated to clinical outcomes. Subcompartments relative to the peritumoral region, invasion, infiltration, proliferation, mass effect and pseudo flush, relapse compartments, gross tumor volumes, and highrisk regions have been defined to characterize the heterogeneity. For the majority of pairwise cooccurrences, we found no evidence to assert that observed co-occurrences were significantly different from their expected co-occurrences (Binomial test with False Discovery Rate correction, α=0.05). The co-occurrence among terms in the studied papers was found to be driven by their individual prevalence and trends in the literature. CONCLUSION Combinations of MR imaging biomarkers from morphological, PWI, DWI and CSI exams have demonstrated their capability to predict clinical outcomes in different management moments of gliomas. Whereas morphologic-derived compartments have been mostly studied during the last ten years, new multi-parametric MRI approaches have also been proposed to discover specific subcompartments of the tumors. MR biomarkers from those subcompartments show the local behavior within the heterogeneous tumor and may quantify the prognosis and response to treatment of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miquel Oltra-Sastre
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Elies Fuster-Garcia
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Juan-Albarracin
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Sáez
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandre Perez-Girbes
- GIBI230 (Grupo de Investigacion Biomedica en Imagen), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio Mocholi
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Urchueguia
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Hervas
- Instituto de Matematica Multidisciplinar (IMM), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gaspar Reynes
- Grupo de Investigacion Clinica y Traslacional del Cancer, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaime Font-de-Mora
- Grupo de Investigacion Clinica y Traslacional del Cancer, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Muñoz-Langa
- GIBI230 (Grupo de Investigacion Biomedica en Imagen), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Botella
- GIBI230 (Grupo de Investigacion Biomedica en Imagen), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fernando Aparici
- GIBI230 (Grupo de Investigacion Biomedica en Imagen), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- GIBI230 (Grupo de Investigacion Biomedica en Imagen), Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria (IIS), Hospital la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan M Garcia-Gomez
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologias de la Informaciony de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Palpan Flores A, Vivancos Sanchez C, Roda JM, Cerdán S, Barrios AJ, Utrilla C, Royo A, Gandía González ML. Assessment of Pre-operative Measurements of Tumor Size by MRI Methods as Survival Predictors in Wild Type IDH Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1662. [PMID: 32984040 PMCID: PMC7492614 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: We evaluate the performance of three MRI methods to determine non-invasively tumor size, as overall survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) predictors, in a cohort of wild type, IDH negative, glioblastoma patients. Investigated protocols included bidimensional (2D) diameter measurements, and three-dimensional (3D) estimations by the ellipsoid or semi-automatic segmentation methods. Methods: We investigated OS in a cohort of 44 patients diagnosed with wild type IDH glioblastoma (58.2 ± 11.4 years, 1.9/1 male/female) treated with neurosurgical resection followed by adjuvant chemo and radiotherapy. Pre-operative MRI images were evaluated to determine tumor mass area and volume, gadolinium enhancement volume, necrosis volume, and FLAIR-T2 hyper-intensity area and volume. We implemented then multivariate Cox statistical analysis to select optimal predictors for OS and PFS. Results: Median OS was 16 months (1–42 months), ranging from 9 ± 2.4 months in patients over 65 years, to 18 ± 1.6 months in younger ones. Patients with tumors carrying O6-methylguanin-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation survived 30 ± 5.2 vs. 13 ± 2.5 months in non-methylated. Our study evidenced high and positive correlations among the results of the three methods to determine tumor size. FLAIR-T2 hyper-intensity areas (2D) and volumes (3D) were also similar as determined by the three methods. Cox proportional hazards analysis with the 2D and 3D methods indicated that OS was associated to age ≥ 65 years (HR 2.70, 2.94, and 3.16), MGMT methylation (HR 2.98, 3.07, and 2.90), and FLAIR-T2 ≥ 2,000 mm2 or ≥60 cm3 (HR 4.16, 3.93, and 3.72), respectively. Other variables including necrosis, tumor mass, necrosis/tumor ratio, and FLAIR/tumor ratio were not significantly correlated with OS. Conclusion: Our results reveal a high correlation among measurements of tumor size performed with the three methods. Pre-operative FLAIR-T2 hyperintensity area and volumes provided, independently of the measurement method, the optimal neuroimaging features predicting OS in primary glioblastoma patients, followed by age ≥ 65 years and MGMT methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - José M Roda
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sebastian Cerdán
- Institute of Biomedical Research "Alberto Sols" CSIC/UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Utrilla
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aranzazu Royo
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bale TA, Jordan JT, Rapalino O, Ramamurthy N, Jessop N, DeWitt JC, Nardi V, Alvarez MML, Frosch M, Batchelor TT, Louis DN, Iafrate AJ, Cahill DP, Lennerz JK. Financially effective test algorithm to identify an aggressive, EGFR-amplified variant of IDH-wildtype, lower-grade diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:596-605. [PMID: 30496526 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Update 3 of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) recognizes amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as one important aberration in diffuse gliomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade II/III). While these recommendations endorse testing, a cost-effective, clinically relevant testing paradigm is currently lacking. Here, we use real-world clinical data to propose a financially effective diagnostic test algorithm in the context of new guidelines. METHODS To determine the prevalence, distribution, neuroradiographic features (Visually Accessible REMBRANDT Images [VASARI]), and prognostic relevance of EGFR amplification in lower-grade gliomas, we assembled a consecutive series of diffuse gliomas. For validation we included publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. For a cost-utility analysis we compared combined EGFR and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) testing, EGFR testing based on IDH results, and no EGFR testing. RESULTS In n = 71 WHO grade II/III gliomas, we identified EGFR amplification in 28.2%. With one exception, all EGFR amplifications occurred in IDH-wildtype gliomas. Comparison of overall survival showed that EGFR amplification denotes a significantly more aggressive subset of tumors (P < 0.0001, log-rank). The radiologic phenotype in the EGFR-amplified tumors includes diffusion restriction (15%, P = 0.02), >5% tumor contrast enhancement (75%, P = 0.016), and mild (not avid) enhancement (P = 0.016). The proposed testing algorithm reserves EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for IDH-wildtype cases. Implementation would result in ~37.9% cost reduction at our institution, or about $1.3-4 million nationally. CONCLUSION EGFR-amplified diffuse gliomas are "glioblastoma-like" in their behavior and may represent undersampled glioblastomas, or subsets of IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas with inherently aggressive biology. EGFR FISH after IDH testing is a financially effective and clinically relevant test algorithm for routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Justin T Jordan
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Neurology, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nisha Ramamurthy
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas Jessop
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John C DeWitt
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Valentina Nardi
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Matthew Frosch
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Neurology, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David N Louis
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A John Iafrate
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Katsoulakis E, Yu Y, Apte AP, Leeman JE, Katabi N, Morris L, Deasy JO, Chan TA, Lee NY, Riaz N, Hatzoglou V, Oh JH. Radiomic analysis identifies tumor subtypes associated with distinct molecular and microenvironmental factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2020; 110:104877. [PMID: 32619927 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify whether radiomic features from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans can predict molecular differences between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHODS 77 patients from the TCIA with HNSCC had imaging suitable for analysis. Radiomic features were extracted and unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to identify subtypes. Genomic data was extracted from the matched patients in the TCGA database. We explored relationships between radiomic features and molecular profiles of tumors, including the tumor immune microenvironment. A machine learning method was used to build a model predictive of CD8 + T-cells. An independent cohort of 83 HNSCC patients was used to validate the radiomic clusters. RESULTS We initially extracted 104 two-dimensional radiomic features, and after feature stability tests and removal of volume dependent features, reduced this to 67 features for subsequent analysis. Consensus clustering based on these features resulted in two distinct clusters. The radiomic clusters differed by primary tumor subsite (p = 0.0096), HPV status (p = 0.0127), methylation-based clustering results (p = 0.0025), and tumor immune microenvironment. A random forest model using radiomic features predicted CD8 + T-cells independent of HPV status with R2 = 0.30 (p < 0.0001) on cross validation. Consensus clustering on the validation cohort resulted in two distinct clusters that differ in tumor subsite (p = 1.3 × 10-7) and HPV status (p = 4.0 × 10-7). CONCLUSION Radiomic analysis can identify biologic features of tumors such as HPV status and T-cell infiltration and may be able to provide other information in the near future to help with patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Katsoulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs, James A Haley, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Aditya P Apte
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan E Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02189, USA
| | - Nora Katabi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Luc Morris
- Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Timothy A Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Jung Hun Oh
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mang A, Bakas S, Subramanian S, Davatzikos C, Biros G. Integrated Biophysical Modeling and Image Analysis: Application to Neuro-Oncology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2020; 22:309-341. [PMID: 32501772 PMCID: PMC7520881 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors come with vastly heterogeneous histologic, molecular, and radiographic landscapes, rendering their precise characterization challenging. The rapidly growing fields of biophysical modeling and radiomics have shown promise in better characterizing the molecular, spatial, and temporal heterogeneity of tumors. Integrative analysis of CNS tumors, including clinically acquired multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the inverse problem of calibrating biophysical models to mpMRI data, assists in identifying macroscopic quantifiable tumor patterns of invasion and proliferation, potentially leading to improved (a) detection/segmentation of tumor subregions and (b) computer-aided diagnostic/prognostic/predictive modeling. This article presents a summary of (a) biophysical growth modeling and simulation,(b) inverse problems for model calibration, (c) these models' integration with imaging workflows, and (d) their application to clinically relevant studies. We anticipate that such quantitative integrative analysis may even be beneficial in a future revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for CNS tumors, ultimately improving patient survival prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Mang
- Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA;
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA;
| | - Shashank Subramanian
- Oden Institute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA; ,
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA); Department of Radiology; and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; ,
| | - George Biros
- Oden Institute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Beig N, Bera K, Prasanna P, Antunes J, Correa R, Singh S, Saeed Bamashmos A, Ismail M, Braman N, Verma R, Hill VB, Statsevych V, Ahluwalia MS, Varadan V, Madabhushi A, Tiwari P. Radiogenomic-Based Survival Risk Stratification of Tumor Habitat on Gd-T1w MRI Is Associated with Biological Processes in Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:1866-1876. [PMID: 32079590 PMCID: PMC7165059 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (i) create a survival risk score using radiomic features from the tumor habitat on routine MRI to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma and (ii) obtain a biological basis for these prognostic radiomic features, by studying their radiogenomic associations with molecular signaling pathways. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Two hundred three patients with pretreatment Gd-T1w, T2w, T2w-FLAIR MRI were obtained from 3 cohorts: The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA; n = 130), Ivy GAP (n = 32), and Cleveland Clinic (n = 41). Gene-expression profiles of corresponding patients were obtained for TCIA cohort. For every study, following expert segmentation of tumor subcompartments (necrotic core, enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema), 936 3D radiomic features were extracted from each subcompartment across all MRI protocols. Using Cox regression model, radiomic risk score (RRS) was developed for every protocol to predict PFS on the training cohort (n = 130) and evaluated on the holdout cohort (n = 73). Further, Gene Ontology and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis were used to identify specific molecular signaling pathway networks associated with RRS features. RESULTS Twenty-five radiomic features from the tumor habitat yielded the RRS. A combination of RRS with clinical (age and gender) and molecular features (MGMT and IDH status) resulted in a concordance index of 0.81 (P < 0.0001) on training and 0.84 (P = 0.03) on the test set. Radiogenomic analysis revealed associations of RRS features with signaling pathways for cell differentiation, cell adhesion, and angiogenesis, which contribute to chemoresistance in GBM. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that prognostic radiomic features from routine Gd-T1w MRI may also be significantly associated with key biological processes that affect response to chemotherapy in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niha Beig
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Kaustav Bera
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Ramon Correa
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Marwa Ismail
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Virginia B Hill
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | - Anant Madabhushi
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Radiomics in gliomas: clinical implications of computational modeling and fractal-based analysis. Neuroradiology 2020; 62:771-790. [DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02403-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
40
|
Vollmann-Zwerenz A, Leidgens V, Feliciello G, Klein CA, Hau P. Tumor Cell Invasion in Glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E1932. [PMID: 32178267 PMCID: PMC7139341 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21061932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a particularly devastating tumor with a median survival of about 16 months. Recent research has revealed novel insights into the outstanding heterogeneity of this type of brain cancer. However, all GBM subtypes share the hallmark feature of aggressive invasion into the surrounding tissue. Invasive glioblastoma cells escape surgery and focal therapies and thus represent a major obstacle for curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of glioma invasion mechanisms with respect to tumor-cell-intrinsic properties as well as cues provided by the microenvironment. We discuss genetic programs that may influence the dissemination and plasticity of GBM cells as well as their different invasion patterns. We also review how tumor cells shape their microenvironment and how, vice versa, components of the extracellular matrix and factors from non-neoplastic cells influence tumor cell motility. We further discuss different research platforms for modeling invasion. Finally, we highlight the importance of accounting for the complex interplay between tumor cell invasion and treatment resistance in glioblastoma when considering new therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arabel Vollmann-Zwerenz
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (A.V.-Z.); (V.L.)
| | - Verena Leidgens
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (A.V.-Z.); (V.L.)
| | - Giancarlo Feliciello
- Fraunhofer-Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (G.F.); (C.A.K.)
| | - Christoph A. Klein
- Fraunhofer-Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (G.F.); (C.A.K.)
- Experimental Medicine and Therapy Research, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (A.V.-Z.); (V.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Glioma invasion and its interplay with nervous tissue and therapy: A multiscale model. J Theor Biol 2020; 486:110088. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
42
|
Barsoum I, Tawedrous E, Faragalla H, Yousef GM. Histo-genomics: digital pathology at the forefront of precision medicine. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 6:203-212. [PMID: 30827078 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The toughest challenge OMICs face is that they provide extremely high molecular resolution but poor spatial information. Understanding the cellular/histological context of the overwhelming genetic data is critical for a full understanding of the clinical behavior of a malignant tumor. Digital pathology can add an extra layer of information to help visualize in a spatial and microenvironmental context the molecular information of cancer. Thus, histo-genomics provide a unique chance for data integration. In the era of a precision medicine, a four-dimensional (4D) (temporal/spatial) analysis of cancer aided by digital pathology can be a critical step to understand the evolution/progression of different cancers and consequently tailor individual treatment plans. For instance, the integration of molecular biomarkers expression into a three-dimensional (3D) image of a digitally scanned tumor can offer a better understanding of its subtype, behavior, host immune response and prognosis. Using advanced digital image analysis, a larger spectrum of parameters can be analyzed as potential predictors of clinical behavior. Correlation between morphological features and host immune response can be also performed with therapeutic implications. Radio-histomics, or the interface of radiological images and histology is another emerging exciting field which encompasses the integration of radiological imaging with digital pathological images, genomics, and clinical data to portray a more holistic approach to understating and treating disease. These advances in digital slide scanning are not without technical challenges, which will be addressed carefully in this review with quick peek at its future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivraym Barsoum
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eriny Tawedrous
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hala Faragalla
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - George M Yousef
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Li J, Liu S, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Wang N, Liu H. High-order radiomics features based on T2 FLAIR MRI predict multiple glioma immunohistochemical features: A more precise and personalized gliomas management. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227703. [PMID: 31968004 PMCID: PMC6975558 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the performance of high-order radiomics features and models based on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2 FLAIR) in predicting the immunohistochemical biomarkers of glioma, in order to execute a non-invasive, more precise and personalized glioma disease management. Methods 51 pathologically confirmed gliomas patients committed in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2018 were retrospective analysis, and Ki-67, vimentin, S-100 and CD34 immunohistochemical data were collected. The volumes of interest (VOIs) were manually sketched and the radiomics features were extracted. Feature reduction was performed by ANOVA+ Mann-Whiney, spearman correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Gradient descent algorithm (GBDT). SMOTE technique was used to solve the data bias between two groups. Comprehensive binary logistic regression models were established. Area under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were used to evaluate the predict performance of models. Models reliability were decided according to the standard net benefit of the decision curves. Results Four clusters of significant features were screened out and four predicting models were constructed. AUC of Ki-67, S-100, vimentin and CD34 models were 0.713, 0.923, 0.854 and 0.745, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.692, 0.893, 0.875 and 0.556, respectively. The specificities were: 0.667, 0.905, 0.722, and 0.875, with accuracy of 0.660, 0.898, 0.738, and 0.667, respectively. According to the decision curves, the Ki-67, S-100 and vimentin models had reference values. Conclusion The radiomics features based on T2 FLAIR can potentially predict the Ki-67, S-100, vimentin and CD34 expression. Radiomics model were expected to be a computer-intelligent, non-invasive, accurate and personalized management method for gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Li
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- Department of Radiology, Tangshan Women and Children’s Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, China
| | - Siyun Liu
- Life Science, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Qin
- Life Science, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Huaijun Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lo Gullo R, Daimiel I, Morris EA, Pinker K. Combining molecular and imaging metrics in cancer: radiogenomics. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:1. [PMID: 31901171 PMCID: PMC6942081 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0795-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiogenomics is the extension of radiomics through the combination of genetic and radiomic data. Because genetic testing remains expensive, invasive, and time-consuming, and thus unavailable for all patients, radiogenomics may play an important role in providing accurate imaging surrogates which are correlated with genetic expression, thereby serving as a substitute for genetic testing. Main body In this article, we define the meaning of radiogenomics and the difference between radiomics and radiogenomics. We provide an up-to-date review of the radiomics and radiogenomics literature in oncology, focusing on breast, brain, gynecological, liver, kidney, prostate and lung malignancies. We also discuss the current challenges to radiogenomics analysis. Conclusion Radiomics and radiogenomics are promising to increase precision in diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and prediction of treatment response, providing valuable information for patient care throughout the course of the disease, given that this information is easily obtainable with imaging. Larger prospective studies and standardization will be needed to define relevant imaging biomarkers before they can be implemented into the clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Lo Gullo
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Isaac Daimiel
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Molecular and Gender Imaging Service, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lu M, Fu ZH, He XJ, Lu JK, Deng XQ, Lin DL, Gu YM, Fan YF, Lai MY, Li J, Yang MM, Chen ZP. T2 Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Resection for Glioblastoma Involving Eloquent Brain Areas Facilitated Through Awake Craniotomy and Clinical Outcome. World Neurosurg 2019; 135:e738-e747. [PMID: 31899397 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence that a greater extent of resection (EOR) improves survival, the role of extended resection based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) in the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the role of additional resection of FLAIR-detected abnormalities and its influence on clinical outcomes of patients with GBM. METHODS Forty-six patients with newly diagnosed GBM involving eloquent brain areas were included. Surgeries were performed using awake craniotomy (AC) or AC combined with sodium fluorescein (SF) guidance. Following total removal of the contrast-enhancing tumor area, the EOR of FLAIR abnormalities was dichotomized to identify the best separation threshold for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 30-day postoperative neurologic function of patients with GBM. RESULTS The threshold for removal of FLAIR abnormalities affecting survival was determined to be 25%. The median OS and PFS were shorter in the group with FLAIR resection <25% compared with the group with FLAIR resection ≥25% (12 months vs. 26 months; P = 0.001 and 6 months vs. 15 months; P = 0.016, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified tumor location within or near the eloquent brain areas and the 25% threshold for FLAIR EOR as independent factors affecting OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS Identifying a feasible threshold for the resection of FLAIR abnormalities is valuable in improving the survival of patients with GBM. Extended resection of GBM involving eloquent brain areas was safe when using a combination of AC and SF-guided surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zheng-Hao Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Jun He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Kan Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Qing Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - De-Liu Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - You-Ming Gu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Feng Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Yao Lai
- Department of Oncology, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Oncology, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Ming Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhong-Ping Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Park JE, Kim HS, Park SY, Nam SJ, Chun SM, Jo Y, Kim JH. Prediction of Core Signaling Pathway by Using Diffusion- and Perfusion-based MRI Radiomics and Next-generation Sequencing in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-type Glioblastoma. Radiology 2019; 294:388-397. [PMID: 31845844 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables highly sensitive cancer genomics analysis, but its clinical implications for therapeutic options from imaging-based prediction have been limited. Purpose To predict core signaling pathways in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma by using diffusion and perfusion MRI radiomics and NGS. Materials and Methods The radiogenomics model was developed by using retrospective patients with glioma who underwent NGS and anatomic, diffusion-, and perfusion-weighted imaging between March 2017 and February 2019. For testing model performance in predicting core signaling pathway, patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma from a retrospective analysis from a registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02619890) were evaluated. Radiogenomic feature selection was performed by using t tests, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalization, and random forest. Combining radiogenomic features, age, and location, the performance of predicting receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), tumor protein p53 (P53), and retinoblastoma 1 pathways was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results There were 120 patients (52 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 61 women) who were evaluated. Eighty-five patients (51 years ± 13; 43 men) were in the training set and 35 patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma (56 years ± 12; 19 women) were in the validation set. Radiogenomics model identified 71 features in the RTK, 17 features in P53, and 35 features in the retinoblastoma pathway. The combined model showed better performance than anatomic imaging-based prediction in the RTK (P = .03) and retinoblastoma (P = .03) and perfusion imaging-based prediction in the P53 pathway (P = .04) in the training set. AUC values of the combined model for the prediction of core signaling pathways were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 1) for RTK, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.92) for P53, and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.97) for retinoblastoma in the validation set. Conclusion A diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI radiomics model can help characterize core signaling pathways and potentially guide targeted therapy for isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Park
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Seo Young Park
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Soo Jung Nam
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Sung-Min Chun
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Youngheun Jo
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Kim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.E.P., H.S.K., Y.J.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), Department of Pathology (S.J.N., S.M.C.), and Department of Neurosurgery (J.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Davatzikos C, Sotiras A, Fan Y, Habes M, Erus G, Rathore S, Bakas S, Chitalia R, Gastounioti A, Kontos D. Precision diagnostics based on machine learning-derived imaging signatures. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 64:49-61. [PMID: 31071473 PMCID: PMC6832825 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The complexity of modern multi-parametric MRI has increasingly challenged conventional interpretations of such images. Machine learning has emerged as a powerful approach to integrating diverse and complex imaging data into signatures of diagnostic and predictive value. It has also allowed us to progress from group comparisons to imaging biomarkers that offer value on an individual basis. We review several directions of research around this topic, emphasizing the use of machine learning in personalized predictions of clinical outcome, in breaking down broad umbrella diagnostic categories into more detailed and precise subtypes, and in non-invasively estimating cancer molecular characteristics. These methods and studies contribute to the field of precision medicine, by introducing more specific diagnostic and predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome, therefore pointing to better matching of treatments to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Yong Fan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Mohamad Habes
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Guray Erus
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Rhea Chitalia
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Aimilia Gastounioti
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Despina Kontos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
TCGA-TCIA Impact on Radiogenomics Cancer Research: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20236033. [PMID: 31795520 PMCID: PMC6929079 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20236033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, the development of radiogenomics research has produced a significant amount of papers describing relations between imaging features and several molecular 'omic signatures arising from next-generation sequencing technology and their potential role in the integrated diagnostic field. The most vulnerable point of many of these studies lies in the poor number of involved patients. In this scenario, a leading role is played by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), which make available, respectively, molecular 'omic data and linked imaging data. In this review, we systematically collected and analyzed radiogenomic studies based on TCGA-TCIA data. We organized literature per tumor type and molecular 'omic data in order to discuss salient imaging genomic associations and limitations of each study. Finally, we outlined the potential clinical impact of radiogenomics to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the prediction of patient outcomes in oncology.
Collapse
|
49
|
Parker JG, Diller EE, Cao S, Nelson JT, Yeom K, Ho C, Lober R. Statistical multiscale mapping of IDH1, MGMT, and microvascular proliferation in human brain tumors from multiparametric MR and spatially-registered core biopsy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:17112. [PMID: 31745125 PMCID: PMC6864039 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53256-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We propose a statistical multiscale mapping approach to identify microscopic and molecular heterogeneity across a tumor microenvironment using multiparametric MR (mp-MR). Twenty-nine patients underwent pre-surgical mp-MR followed by MR-guided stereotactic core biopsy. The locations of the biopsy cores were identified in the pre-surgical images using stereotactic bitmaps acquired during surgery. Feature matrices mapped the multiparametric voxel values in the vicinity of the biopsy cores to the pathologic outcome variables for each patient and logistic regression tested the individual and collective predictive power of the MR contrasts. A non-parametric weighted k-nearest neighbor classifier evaluated the feature matrices in a leave-one-out cross validation design across patients. Resulting class membership probabilities were converted to chi-square statistics to develop full-brain parametric maps, implementing Gaussian random field theory to estimate inter-voxel dependencies. Corrections for family-wise error rates were performed using Benjamini-Hochberg and random field theory, and the resulting accuracies were compared. The combination of all five image contrasts correlated with outcome (P < 10−4) for all four microscopic variables. The probabilistic mapping method using Benjamini-Hochberg generated statistically significant results (α ≤ 0.05) for three of the four dependent variables: (1) IDH1, (2) MGMT, and (3) microvascular proliferation, with an average classification accuracy of 0.984 ± 0.02 and an average classification sensitivity of 1.567% ± 0.967. The images corrected by random field theory demonstrated improved classification accuracy (0.989 ± 0.008) and classification sensitivity (5.967% ± 2.857) compared with Benjamini-Hochberg. Microscopic and molecular tumor properties can be assessed with statistical confidence across the brain from minimally-invasive, mp-MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason G Parker
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA. .,School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, Indiana, USA.
| | - Emily E Diller
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.,School of Health Sciences, Purdue University, Indiana, USA
| | - Sha Cao
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA
| | - Jeremy T Nelson
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.,Military Health Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Kristen Yeom
- Radiology, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital and Stanford University Medical Center, California, USA
| | - Chang Ho
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA
| | - Robert Lober
- Neurosurgery, Dayton Children's Hospital, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bakas S, Saligheh Rad H, Davatzikos C. Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 52:54-69. [PMID: 31456318 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past few decades, the advent and development of genomic assessment methods and computational approaches have raised the hopes for identifying therapeutic targets that may aid in the treatment of glioblastoma. However, the targeted therapies have barely been successful in their effort to cure glioblastoma patients, leaving them with a grim prognosis. Glioblastoma exhibits high heterogeneity, both spatially and temporally. The existence of different genetic subpopulations in glioblastoma allows this tumor to adapt itself to environmental forces. Therefore, patients with glioblastoma respond poorly to the prescribed therapies, as treatments are directed towards the whole tumor and not to the specific genetic subregions. Genomic alterations within the tumor develop distinct radiographic phenotypes. In this regard, MRI plays a key role in characterizing molecular signatures of glioblastoma, based on regional variations and phenotypic presentation of the tumor. Radiogenomics has emerged as a (relatively) new field of research to explore the connections between genetic alterations and imaging features. Radiogenomics offers numerous advantages, including noninvasive and global assessment of the tumor and its response to therapies. In this review, we summarize the potential role of radiogenomic techniques to stratify patients according to their specific tumor characteristics with the goal of designing patient-specific therapies. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:54-69.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|