Homeopathy for depression: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-armed study (DEP-HOM)

HRI London 2023: The Homeopathy Research Community Reunites after a 4-Year Hiatus, Sparking Fresh Collaborations between Researchers 'Old and New'

The Homeopathy Research Institute's (HRI) 5th international research conference took place in the heart of London, from 16th to 18th June 2023. With 230 attendees from 27 countries, HRI's conferences remain truly international. HRI London 2023 will be remembered for its inspiring blend of 'old and new', with a programme notable for the maturity of the evidence presented by experienced names drawing on decades of work, as well as the enthusiasm and skill of up-and-coming researchers who took the floor to present their new findings. In this report, we present scientific highlights from the event.

Homeopathy for Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for N-of-1 Studies

BACKGROUND

N-of-1 studies allow the formal assessment of a patient's treatment. A single participant receives different interventions the same number of times in a crossover, double-blind, randomized design. Using this methodology, we will investigate the effectiveness and safety of a standardized homeopathy protocol in treating 10 cases of major depression.

METHODS

The method is described below: Design: crossover double-blind placebo-controlled randomized N-of-1 studies, with at most 28 weeks of duration per participant.

PARTICIPANTS

women and men at age over 18 years with a diagnosis of a major depressive episode given by a psychiatrist, who have presented a therapeutic response, i.e., a reduction ≥50% of the baseline depressive symptoms, self-assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory - Second Edition (BDI-II), and sustained for at least 4 weeks during an open homeopathic treatment following the protocol of the sixth edition of the Organon, with or without concomitant use of psychotropic drugs.

INTERVENTIONS

individualized homeopathy following the same protocol, one globule of the fifty-millesimal potency diluted in 20 mL of 30% alcohol; placebo - 20 mL of 30% alcohol, in the same posology as homeopathy. Crossover study: the participant will go through three consecutive treatment blocks, with two random and masked treatment periods (A or B), corresponding to homeopathy or placebo. Treatment periods will have 2, 4, and 8 weeks in the first, second, and third blocks, respectively. A clinically significant worsening (characterized by an augmentation in BDI-II inclusion score ≥30%) will result in the termination of study participation and resumption of the open treatment.

PRIMARY MEASURE

progression of the depressive symptoms, self-assessed by the participant using the BDI-II scale at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 and analyzed throughout the study concerning homeopathy and placebo partitions. Secondary measures: score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale; mental and physical health scores assessed by the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; participant's blind preference for treatment A or B at each block; clinical worsening; and adverse events.

DATA ANALYSIS

the participant, assistant physician, evaluator, and statistician will remain blinded for the study treatments until the completion of data analysis of each study. We will follow a 10-step procedure for analyzing N-of-1 observational data of each participant and conduct a meta-analysis of the combined results.

DISCUSSION

We understand that each N-de-1 study will be a chapter with its teachings in a book of ten, allowing a broader view of the effectiveness of the homeopathy protocol of the sixth edition of the Organon in treating depression.

Hintergrund

Einzelpatienten- oder „n = 1“-Studien ermöglichen die formelle Beurteilung der Behandlung eines Patienten. Bei einem einzigen Teilnehmer werden verschiedene Maßnahmen in gleicher Zahl in einem doppelblinden, randomisierten Crossover-Design angewendet. Mit dieser Methode untersuchen wir die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit eines standardisierten Homöopathie-Protokolls zur Behandlung von Major Depression in zehn Fällen.

Methoden

Aufbau der Studie: Doppelblinde, placebokontrollierte, randomisierte Einzelpatienten- oder „n = 1“-Studie von maximal 28 Wochen Dauer pro Teilnehmer. Teilnehmer: Frauen und Männer ab 18 Jahren mit durch einen Psychiater diagnostizierter Episode einer Major Depression und mit mindestens vier Wochen lang anhaltendem therapeutischem Ansprechen (in Form einer Reduktion der depressiven Symptome um ≥50% gegenüber Baseline laut Selbstbeurteilung mit dem Beck Depression Inventar, zweite Ausgabe [BDI-II]) unter einer offenen homöopathischen Behandlung gemäß dem Protokoll der sechsten Auflage des Organon, mit oder ohne gleichzeitige Anwendung von Psychopharmaka. Interventionen: Individualisierte Homöopathie gemäß demselben Protokoll, ein Globulus der Quinquaginta-Millesimal-Potenz, verdünnt in 20 mL 30%igem Alkohol; Placebo in Form von 20 mL 30%igem Alkohol, nach demselben Dosierungsschema wie die Homöopathie. Crossover-Studie: Der Teilnehmer durchläuft in zwei randomisierten und maskierten Behandlungszeiträumen (A oder B), die Homöopathie oder Placebo enstprechen, je drei aufeinanderfolgende Behandlungsblöcke. Innerhalb der Behandlungszeiträume umfassen der erste, zweite und dritte Block je zwei, vier beziehungsweise acht Wochen. Eine klinisch bedeutsame Verschlechterung (gekennzeichnet durch einen Anstieg des BDI-II-Scores um ≥30% gegenüber der Aufnahme) führt zum Abbruch der Studienteilnahme und zur Wiederaufnahme der offenen Behandlung. Primäre Messgröße: Verlauf der depressiven Symptome laut Selbstbeurteilung des Teilnehmers mit der BDI-II-Skala in Woche 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 und Auswertung im Verlauf der Studie nach Homöopathie-und Placebo-Abschnitten. Sekundäre Messgrößen: Score auf der Clinical Global Impression Scale; Scores für psychische und physische Gesundheit laut 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; verblindete Teilnehmerpräferenz für Behandlung A oder B in jedem Block; klinische Ver-schlechterung und unerwünschte Ereignisse. Datenauswertung: Der Teilnehmer, behandelnde Arzt, Auswertende und Statistiker bleiben im Hinblick auf die Stu-dienbehandlungen verblindet, bis die Datenauswertung jeder Studie abgeschlossen ist. Wir werden in einem 10-schrittigen Vorgehen die „n = 1“-Beobachtungsdaten der einzelnen Teilnehmer auswerten und eine Metaanalyse der zusammengeführten Ergebnissee durchführen.

Diskussion

Unserer Auffassung nach wird jede einzelne „n = 1“-Studie ein Kapitel mit eigenen Lehren innerhalb eines zehnteiligen Buches sein, welches eine umfassende Darstellung der Wirksamkeit des Homöopathie-Protokolls der sechsten Ausgabe des Organon zur Behandlung von Depressionen ermöglicht.

Hypericum perforatum to Improve Postoperative Pain Outcome After Monosegmental Spinal Sequestrectomy (HYPOS): Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Introduction: Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery often suffer from severe radicular postoperative pain leading to the prescription of high-dose opioids. In Integrative Medicine, Hypericum perforatum is known as a remedy to relieve pain caused by nerve damage. Objectives: This trial investigated whether homeopathic Hypericum leads to a reduction in postoperative pain and a decrease in pain medication compared with placebo. Design: Randomized double blind, monocentric, placebo controlled clinical trial. Settings/Location: Department of Neurosurgery, Community Hospital Herdecke. Subjects: Inpatients undergoing lumbar sequestrectomy surgery. Interventions: Homeopathic treatment versus placebo in addition to usual pain management. Outcomes Measures: Primary endpoint was pain relief measured with a visual analog scale. Secondary endpoints were the reduction of inpatient postoperative analgesic medication and change in sensory and affective pain perception. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Pain perception between baseline and day 3 did not significantly differ between the study arms. With respect to pain medication, total morphine equivalent doses did not differ significantly. However, a statistical trend and a moderate effect (d = 0.432) in the decrease of pain medication consumption in favor of the Hypericum group was observed. Conclusion: This is the first trial of homeopathy that evaluated the efficacy of Hypericum C200 after lumbar monosegmental spinal sequestrectomy. Although no significant differences between the groups could be shown, we found that patients who took potentiated Hypericum in addition to usual pain management showed lower consumption of analgesics. Further investigations, especially with regard to pain medication, should follow to better classify the described analgesic reduction. Clinical Trial Registration Number: German Clinical Trials Register No: DRKS00007913.

Homeopathic Remedies in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Homeopathy is a complementary and alternative medicine. Conclusive evidence on the plausibility, efficacy, and safety of these treatments is not currently available. Nonetheless, homeopathic remedies (HRs) are widespread throughout the world and especially in mental disorders. The aim is to assess the efficacy of HRs in the treatment of mental disorders.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

We performed a Medline/Embase search for studies written in English and published from any date to October 23, 2018. All randomized controlled trials enrolling patients with any psychiatric disorder and comparing HR with placebo, no treatment, or other psychotropic drugs were included.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

A total of 212 studies were screened, 9 met all selection criteria and reported data on major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 4), generalized anxiety disorder (n = 1), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 2), and premenstrual syndrome/dysphoric disorder (n = 2). Eight of 9 randomized controlled trials showed high risk of bias. Homeopathy showed greater efficacy in MDD compared with fluoxetine, and in premenstrual syndrome/dysphoric disorder compared with placebo, whereas no difference emerged between homeopathy and placebo in MDD and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Available data on homeopathy in psychiatric disorders are insufficient to support their use in clinical practice.

The Bell Tolls for Homeopathy: Time for Change in the Training and Practice of North American Naturopathic Physicians

North American naturopathic medicine is a distinct form of practice that is woven into the larger fabric of integrative medicine; in a number of US states and Canadian provinces, naturopathic doctors enjoy a wide scope of practice, including the ability to make diagnoses, order tests, use medical technology, write prescription drugs, and perform minor surgeries. However, the basic premise of naturopathic medicine and its guiding principles-considering the whole person and supporting healthy lifestyle behaviors-is the unifying approach in clinical practice. In the 1970s, homeopathy-considered in many circles to be a hypothesis-driven, fringe form of alternative medicine-became embedded into the training and practice of North American naturopathic doctors. Since the earliest days of its theory (circa 1800), homeopathy has escaped, and continues to escape, biological plausibility; however, the persistence of this modality (and the insistence by both its consumers and practitioners that it provides benefit) speaks to the role of expectations, beliefs, values, agency, context effects, and the placebo-at-large. It is our contention that the progression of professional naturopathic medicine in the 21st century requires a major transition in how it approaches the subject of homeopathy. We propose that students should be encouraged to critically analyze the tenets of homeopathy, its lesser known history, and the idea of homeopathy as a biomedicine that simply awaits untold chemicophysical mechanisms. Furthermore, the modality of homeopathy should be incorporated into the larger context of placebo studies, narrative medicine, ethics, and psychotherapeutic techniques.

Depression treated by homeopaths: a study protocol for a pragmatic cohort multiple randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The most commonly recommended treatments for depression are psychological/psychotherapeutic treatments, and antidepressant drugs. However, 38 percent of patients with depression do not use these recommended treatments. Some patients seek homeopathic treatment for depression, but insufficient evidence exists to conclude as to the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of treatment by homeopaths for patients with depression. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the acceptability and comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of the offer of adjunctive treatment provided by homeopaths for patients with self-reported depression.

METHOD

This pragmatic randomised controlled trial is embedded within the population based South Yorkshire Cohort (SYC) of whom nine percent self-report long-term depression. The SYC is designed to facilitate 'cohort multiple' randomised controlled trials (cmRCT). A self-completed questionnaire will be used to both screen and collect baseline data from potential trial participants. The primary outcome is PHQ-9. One-hundred-and-sixty-two participants will be randomly selected to the intervention group (Offer of treatment by a homeopath). The results of the Offer and the No Offer groups will be compared at 6 and 12 months using both an intention to treat (ITT) and complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis. Cost-effectiveness analysis will involve calculation of quality adjusted life year (QALY). In order to help interpret the quantitative findings a selection of up to 30 patients in the offer group will be invited to participate in qualitative interviews after the first consultation and after a minimum of 6 months. Interviews will be assessed by two researchers and results will be analysed using thematic analysis. Triangulation will be used to combine results from qualitative and quantitative methodologies at the interpretation stage, to see if results agree, offer complementary information on the same issue or contradict each other.