1
|
Chen H, Zhai C, Xu X, Wang H, Han W, Shen J. Multilevel Heterogeneity of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:59. [PMID: 38201487 PMCID: PMC10778489 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Therapies that target both primary foci and liver metastasis are severely lacking. Therefore, understanding the features of metastatic tumor cells in the liver is valuable for the overall control of CRLM patients. In this review, we summarize the heterogeneity exhibited in CRLM from five aspects (gene, transcriptome, protein, metabolism, and immunity). In addition to genetic heterogeneity, the other four aspects exhibit significant heterogeneity. Compared to primary CRC, the dysregulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins, the enhanced metabolic activity, and the increased infiltration of immunosuppressive cells are detected in CRLM. Preclinical evidence shows that targeting the EMT process or enhancing cellular metabolism may represent a novel approach to increasing the therapeutic efficacy of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Weidong Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China; (H.C.); (C.Z.); (X.X.); (H.W.)
| | - Jiaying Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China; (H.C.); (C.Z.); (X.X.); (H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lund-Andersen C, Torgunrud A, Fleten KG, Flatmark K. Omics analyses in peritoneal metastasis-utility in the management of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S191-S203. [PMID: 33968437 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-throughput "-omics" analysis may provide a broader and deeper understanding of cancer biology to define prognostic and predictive biomarkers and identify novel therapy targets. In this review we provide an overview of studies where the peritoneal tumor component of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) were analyzed. Most of the available data was derived from DNA mutation analysis, but a brief review of findings from transcriptomic and protein expression analysis was also performed. Studies reporting genomic analysis of peritoneal tumor samples from 1,779 PM-CRC and 623 PMP cases were identified. The most frequently mutated genes in PM-CRC were KRAS, APC, SMAD4, BRAF, and PIK3CA, while in PMP KRAS, GNAS, FAT4, TGFBR1, TP53 and SMAD3/4 mutations were most commonly identified. Analyses were performed by single-gene analyses and to some extent targeted next-generation sequencing, and a very limited amount of broad explorative data exists. The investigated cohorts were typically small and heterogeneous with respect to the methods used and to the reporting of clinical data. This was even more apparent regarding transcriptomic and protein data, as the low number of cases examined and quality of clinical data would not support firm conclusions. Even for the most frequently mutated genes, the results varied greatly; for instance, KRAS mutations were reported at frequencies between 20-57% in PM-CRC and 38-100% in PMP. Such variation could be caused by random effects in small cohorts, heterogeneity in patient selection, or sensitivity of applied technology. Although a large number of samples have been subjected to analysis, cross-study comparisons are difficult to perform, and combined with small cohorts and varying quality and detail of clinical information, the observed variation precludes useful interpretation in a clinical context. Although omics data in theory could answer questions to aid management decisions in PM-CRC and PMP, the existing data does not presently support clinical implementation. With the necessary technologies being generally available, the main challenge will be to obtain sufficiently large, representative cohorts with adequate clinical data and standardized reporting of results. Importantly, studies where the focus is specifically on peritoneal disease are needed, where the study designs are aligned with clearly defined research questions to allow robust conclusions. Such studies are highly warranted if patients with PM-CRC and PMP are to derive benefit from recent advances in precision cancer medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Lund-Andersen
- Department of Tumor Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annette Torgunrud
- Department of Tumor Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karianne Giller Fleten
- Department of Tumor Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Department of Tumor Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baldacchino S, Grech G. Somatic copy number aberrations in metastatic patients: The promise of liquid biopsies. Semin Cancer Biol 2019; 60:302-310. [PMID: 31891778 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Cancer metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The metastatic process involves measurable cellular changes that confer migratory potential, proliferative advantage and the ability to colonise a distinct microenvironment. Accumulation of aberrations and clonal evolution add complexity to patient management and the assessment of the therapeutic sensitivity profile of malignancies. Liquid biopsy presents a repeatable and minimally invasive assessment tool to detect early metastasis, characterise tumour phenotype and detect minimal residual disease. The promise of liquid biopsies is to inform patient management and therapeutic decisions in a timely manner. Clinical translation requires robust methodologies with high sensitivity and tumour specificity. This can be achieved through technological advances but also through novel biologically informed approaches that harness existing knowledge on tumorigenesis. Here we present a review of copy number variations as potential biomarkers for early detection of metastatic potential and outline a biomarker validation process in the context of liquid biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Baldacchino
- Applied Biotech Ltd, Cambridge, UK; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine & Surgery, University of Malta, Malta.
| | - Godfrey Grech
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine & Surgery, University of Malta, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vincenten JPL, van Essen HF, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Bulkmans NWJ, Krijgsman O, Sie D, Eijk PP, Smit EF, Ylstra B, Thunnissen E. Clonality analysis of pulmonary tumors by genome-wide copy number profiling. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223827. [PMID: 31618260 PMCID: PMC6795528 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple tumors in patients are frequently diagnosed, either synchronous or metachronous. The distinction between a second primary and a metastasis is important for treatment. Chromosomal DNA copy number aberrations (CNA) patterns are highly unique to specific tumors. The aim of this study was to assess genome-wide CNA-patterns as method to identify clonally related tumors in a prospective cohort of patients with synchronous or metachronous tumors, with at least one intrapulmonary tumor. In total, 139 tumor pairs from 90 patients were examined: 35 synchronous and 104 metachronous pairs. Results of CNA were compared to histological type, clinicopathological methods (Martini-Melamed-classification (MM) and ACCP-2013-criteria), and, if available, EGFR- and KRAS-mutation analysis. CNA-results were clonal in 74 pairs (53%), non-clonal in 33 pairs (24%), and inconclusive in 32 pairs (23%). Histological similarity was found in 130 pairs (94%). Concordance between histology and conclusive CNA-results was 69% (74 of 107 pairs: 72 clonal and two non-clonal). In 31 of 103 pairs with similar histology, genetics revealed non-clonality. In two out of four pairs with non-matching histology, genetics revealed clonality. The subgroups of synchronous and metachronous pairs showed similar outcome for the comparison of histological versus CNA-results. MM-classification and ACCP-2013-criteria, applicable on 34 pairs, and CNA-results were concordant in 50% and 62% respectively. Concordance between mutation matching and conclusive CNA-results was 89% (8 of 9 pairs: six clonal and two non-clonal). Interestingly, in one patient both tumors had the same KRAS mutation, but the CNA result was non-clonal. In conclusion, although some concordance between histological comparison and CNA profiling is present, arguments exist to prefer extensive molecular testing to determine whether a second tumor is a metastasis or a second primary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien P. L. Vincenten
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik F. van Essen
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tumor Genome Analysis Core, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Oscar Krijgsman
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daoud Sie
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tumor Genome Analysis Core, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul P. Eijk
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tumor Genome Analysis Core, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert F. Smit
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Tumor Genome Analysis Core, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Thunnissen
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piskol R, Huw L, Sergin I, Kljin C, Modrusan Z, Kim D, Kljavin N, Tam R, Patel R, Burton J, Penuel E, Qu X, Koeppen H, Sumiyoshi T, de Sauvage F, Lackner MR, de Sousa e Melo F, Kabbarah O. A Clinically Applicable Gene-Expression Classifier Reveals Intrinsic and Extrinsic Contributions to Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Primary and Metastatic Colon Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:4431-4442. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
6
|
Yang PS, Hsu HH, Hsu TC, Chen MJ, Wang CD, Yu SL, Hsu YC, Li KC. Genome-Wide Scan for Copy Number Alteration Association with Relapse-Free Survival in Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis Patients. J Clin Med 2018; 7:446. [PMID: 30453668 PMCID: PMC6262537 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7110446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Predicting a patient's risk of recurrence after the resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer is critical for evaluating and selecting therapeutic approaches. Clinical and pathologic parameters have shown limited accuracy thus far. Therefore, we combined the clinical status with a genomic approach to stratify relapse-free survival in colorectal cancer liver metastases patients. To identify new molecular and genetic signatures specific to colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM) patients, we conducted DNA copy number profiling on a cohort of 21 Taiwanese CRCLM patients using a comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array. We identified a three-gene signature based on differential copy number alteration between patients with different statuses of (1) recurrence and (2) synchronous metastasis. In relapse hotspot regions, only three genes (S100PBP, CSMD2, and TGFBI) were significantly associated with the synchronous liver metastasis factor. A final set of three genes-S100PBP, CSMD2, TGFBI-significantly predicted relapse-free survival in our cohort (p = 0.04) and another CRCLM cohort (p = 0.02). This three-gene signature is the first genomic signature validated for relapse-free survival in post-hepatectomy CRCLM patients. Our three-gene signature was developed using a whole-genome CGH array and has a good prognostic position for the relapse-free survival of CRCLM patients after hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Sheng Yang
- Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei 252, Taiwan.
- Department of General Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan.
| | - Hsi-Hsien Hsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan.
| | - Tzu-Chi Hsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan.
| | - Ming-Jen Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan.
| | - Cin-Di Wang
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
| | - Sung-Liang Yu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
| | - Yi-Chiung Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.
| | - Ker-Chau Li
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
- Department of Statistics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blank A, Roberts DE, Dawson H, Zlobec I, Lugli A. Tumor Heterogeneity in Primary Colorectal Cancer and Corresponding Metastases. Does the Apple Fall Far From the Tree? Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:234. [PMID: 30234115 PMCID: PMC6128217 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer harbors tremendous heterogeneity, with temporal and spatial differences in genetic mutations, epigenetic regulation, and tumor microenvironment. Analyzing the distribution and frequency of genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironment differences within a given tumor and between different sites of a metastatic tumor has been used as a powerful tool to investigate tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and to yield insight into various models of tumor development. A better understanding of tumor heterogeneity would have tremendous clinical relevance, which may manifest most clearly when genetic analyses to inform treatment decisions are performed on a very limited sample of a large tumor. This review summarizes the current concepts of tumor heterogeneity, with a focus on primary colorectal cancers and their corresponding metastases as well as potential clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Blank
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Clinical Pathology Division, Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Edward Roberts
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Heather Dawson
- Clinical Pathology Division, Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Inti Zlobec
- Translational Research Unit, Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Lugli
- Clinical Pathology Division, Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Our understanding of the genetics of colorectal cancer has changed dramatically over recent years. Colorectal cancer can be classified in multiple different ways. Along with the advent of whole-exome sequencing, we have gained an understanding of the scale of the genetic changes found in sporadic colorectal cancer. We now know that there are multiple pathways that are commonly involved in the evolution of colorectal cancer including Wnt/β-catenin, RAS, EGFR, and PIK3 kinase. Another recent leap in our understanding of colorectal cancer genetics is the recognition that many, if not all tumors, are actually genetically heterogeneous within individual tumors and also between tumors. Recent research has revealed the prognostic and possibly therapeutic implications of various specific mutations, including specific mutations in BRAF and KRAS . There is increasing interest in the use of mutation testing for screening and surveillance through stool and circulating DNA testing. Recent advances in translational research in colorectal cancer genetics are dramatically changing our understanding of colorectal cancer and will likely change therapy and surveillance in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin M Hardiman
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
High-throughput biological technologies are routinely used to generate gene expression profiling or cytogenetics data. To achieve high performance, methods available in the literature become more specialized and often require high computational resources. Here, we propose a new versatile method based on the data-ordering rank values. We use linear algebra, the Perron-Frobenius theorem and also extend a method presented earlier for searching differentially expressed genes for the detection of recurrent copy number aberration. A result derived from the proposed method is a one-sample Student's t-test based on rank values. The proposed method is to our knowledge the only that applies to gene expression profiling and to cytogenetics data sets. This new method is fast, deterministic, and requires a low computational load. Probabilities are associated with genes to allow a statistically significant subset selection in the data set. Stability scores are also introduced as quality parameters. The performance and comparative analyses were carried out using real data sets. The proposed method can be accessed through an R package available from the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network) website: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fcros .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doulaye Dembélé
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), CNRS UMR 7104, INSERM U 1258, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bosch LJW, Trooskens G, Snaebjornsson P, Coupé VMH, Mongera S, Haan JC, Richman SD, Koopman M, Tol J, de Meyer T, Louwagie J, Dehaspe L, van Grieken NCT, Ylstra B, Verheul HMW, van Engeland M, Nagtegaal ID, Herman JG, Quirke P, Seymour MT, Punt CJA, van Criekinge W, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. Decoy receptor 1 ( DCR1) promoter hypermethylation and response to irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:63140-63154. [PMID: 28968978 PMCID: PMC5609910 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Diversity in colorectal cancer biology is associated with variable responses to standard chemotherapy. We aimed to identify and validate DNA hypermethylated genes as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan treatment of metastatic CRC patients. Candidate genes were selected from 389 genes involved in DNA Damage Repair by correlation analyses between gene methylation status and drug response in 32 cell lines. A large series of samples (n=818) from two phase III clinical trials was used to evaluate these candidate genes by correlating methylation status to progression-free survival after treatment with first-line single-agent fluorouracil (Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) or combination chemotherapy (Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (CAPIRI/FOLFIRI)). In the discovery (n=185) and initial validation set (n=166), patients with methylated Decoy Receptor 1 (DCR1) did not benefit from CAPIRI over Capecitabine treatment (discovery set: HR=1.2 (95%CI 0.7-1.9, p=0.6), validation set: HR=0.9 (95%CI 0.6-1.4, p=0.5)), whereas patients with unmethylated DCR1 did (discovery set: HR=0.4 (95%CI 0.3-0.6, p=0.00001), validation set: HR=0.5 (95%CI 0.3-0.7, p=0.0008)). These results could not be replicated in the external data set (n=467), where a similar effect size was found in patients with methylated and unmethylated DCR1 for FOLFIRI over 5FU treatment (methylated DCR1: HR=0.7 (95%CI 0.5-0.9, p=0.01), unmethylated DCR1: HR=0.8 (95%CI 0.6-1.2, p=0.4)). In conclusion, DCR1 promoter hypermethylation status is a potential predictive biomarker for response to treatment with irinotecan, when combined with capecitabine. This finding could not be replicated in an external validation set, in which irinotecan was combined with 5FU. These results underline the challenge and importance of extensive clinical evaluation of candidate biomarkers in multiple trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Trooskens
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Mongera
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josien C Haan
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan D Richman
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Tim de Meyer
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Luc Dehaspe
- MDxHealth, SA, Liège, Belgium.,Genomics Core Facility, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew T Seymour
- St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,MDxHealth, SA, Liège, Belgium
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ganesh K, Shah RH, Vakiani E, Nash GM, Skottowe HP, Yaeger R, Cercek A, Lincoln A, Tran C, Segal NH, Reidy DL, Varghese A, Epstein AS, Sonoda Y, Chi D, Guillem J, Temple L, Paty P, Hechtman J, Shia J, Weiser M, Aguilar JG, Kemeny N, Berger MF, Saltz L, Stadler ZK. Clinical and genetic determinants of ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer 2016; 123:1134-1143. [PMID: 27875625 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer (OM-CRC) often are unresponsive to chemotherapy and are associated with poor survival. To the authors' knowledge, the clinicopathologic and genomic predictors of OM-CRC are poorly characterized and optimal clinical management remains unclear. METHODS Women with a histopathological diagnosis of OM-CRC who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1999 to 2015 were identified. Next-generation somatic mutation profiling (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets [MSK-IMPACT]) was performed on 38 OM-CRC cases, including 21 matched tumor pairs/trios. Regression models were used to analyze variables associated with progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), and neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (NTRK1) mutations were more frequent in cases of OM-CRC than in instances of CRC occurring without OM. SMAD4 and lysine methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D) mutations were associated with reduced OS. Matched multisite tumor sequencing did not identify OM-specific genomic alterations. Of the 195 patients who underwent oophorectomy for OM-CRC (median age, 49 years with a progression-free survival of 9.4 months and an OS of 23 months from oophorectomy), 76% had extraovarian metastasis (EOM). In multivariable analysis, residual disease after surgery (R2 resection) was associated with worse survival. Patients with EOM were less likely to achieve R0/R1 surgical resection status (complete macroscopic resection without clinical/radiological evidence of disease) (48% vs 94%). However, if R0/R1 resection status was achieved, both patients with (35.9 months vs 12 months) and without (43.2 months vs 14.5 months) EOM were found to have better OS. Among 114 patients with R0/R1 resection status, 23 (20%) had no disease recurrence, including 10 patients (9%) with > 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Loss-of-function alterations in SMAD4 are frequent and predictive of worse survival in patients with OM-CRC. Similar to oligometastatic CRC to the lung or liver, surgical resection of OM-CRC is associated with a better outcome only if all macroscopic metastatic disease is resected. Cancer 2017;123:1134-1143. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna Ganesh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronak H Shah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne Lincoln
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christina Tran
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Diane L Reidy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna Varghese
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew S Epstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dennis Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jose Guillem
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Larissa Temple
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jaclyn Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martin Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sveen A, Løes IM, Alagaratnam S, Nilsen G, Høland M, Lingjærde OC, Sorbye H, Berg KCG, Horn A, Angelsen JH, Knappskog S, Lønning PE, Lothe RA. Intra-patient Inter-metastatic Genetic Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer as a Key Determinant of Survival after Curative Liver Resection. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006225. [PMID: 27472274 PMCID: PMC4966938 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability is a well-defined hallmark of tumor aggressiveness and metastatic progression in colorectal cancer. The magnitude of genetic heterogeneity among distinct liver metastases from the same patient at the copy number level, as well as its relationship with chemotherapy exposure and patient outcome, remains unknown. We performed high-resolution DNA copy number analyses of 134 liver metastatic deposits from 45 colorectal cancer patients to assess: (i) intra-patient inter-metastatic genetic heterogeneity using a heterogeneity score based on pair-wise genetic distances among tumor deposits; and (ii) genomic complexity, defined as the proportion of the genome harboring aberrant DNA copy numbers. Results were analyzed in relation to the patients' clinical course; previous chemotherapy exposure and outcome after surgical resection of liver metastases. We observed substantial variation in the level of intra-patient inter-metastatic heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was not associated with the number of metastatic lesions or their genomic complexity. In metachronous disease, heterogeneity was higher in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy. Importantly, intra-patient inter-metastatic heterogeneity was a strong prognostic determinant, stronger than known clinicopathological prognostic parameters. Patients with a low level of heterogeneity (below the median level) had a three-year progression-free and overall survival rate of 23% and 66% respectively, versus 5% and 18% for patients with a high level (hazard ratio0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.8, P = 0.01; and hazard ratio0.3,95% confidence interval 0.1-0.7, P = 0.007). A low patient-wise level of genomic complexity (below 25%) was also a favorable prognostic factor; however, the prognostic association of intra-patient heterogeneity was independent of genomic complexity in multivariable analyses. In conclusion, intra-patient inter-metastatic genetic heterogeneity is a pronounced feature of metastatic colorectal cancer, and the strong prognostic association reinforces its clinical relevance and places it as a key feature to be explored in future patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inger Marie Løes
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sharmini Alagaratnam
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Nilsen
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maren Høland
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kaja Christine Graue Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Horn
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jon-Helge Angelsen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Stian Knappskog
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Per Eystein Lønning
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tanenbaum DG, Hall WA, Colbert LE, Bastien AJ, Brat DJ, Kong J, Kim S, Dwivedi B, Kowalski J, Landry JC, Yu DS. TNFRSF10C copy number variation is associated with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:306-14. [PMID: 27284460 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2015.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic markers for distant metastatic disease in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are not well defined. Identification of genetic alterations associated with metastatic CRC could help to guide systemic and local treatment strategies. We evaluated the association of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 10C (TNFRSF10C) copy number variation (CNV) with distant metastatic disease in patients with CRC using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHODS Genetic sequencing data and clinical characteristics were obtained from TCGA for all available patients with CRC. There were 515 CRC patient samples with CNV and clinical outcome data, including a subset of 144 rectal adenocarcinoma patient samples. Using the TCGA CRC dataset, CNV of TNFRSF10C was evaluated for association with distant metastatic disease (M1 vs. M0). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with odds ratio (OR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed adjusting for age, T stage, N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, gender, microsatellite instability (MSI), location, and surgical margin status. RESULTS TNFRSF10C CNV in patients with CRC was associated with distant metastatic disease [OR 4.81 (95% CI, 2.13-10.85) P<0.001] and positive lymph nodes [OR 18.83 (95% CI, 8.42-42.09)]; P<0.001) but not MSI (OR P=0.799). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for pathologic T stage, N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, gender, and MSI, TNFRSF10C CNV remained significantly associated with distant metastatic disease (OR P=0.018). Subset analysis revealed that TNFRSF10C CNV was also significantly associated with distant metastatic disease in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (OR P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS TNFRSF10C CNV in patients with CRC is associated with distant metastatic disease. With further validation, such genetic profiles could be used clinically to support optimal systemic treatment strategies versus more aggressive local therapies in patients with CRC, including radiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Tanenbaum
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William A Hall
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lauren E Colbert
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amanda J Bastien
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel J Brat
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jun Kong
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sungjin Kim
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bhakti Dwivedi
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeanne Kowalski
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jerome C Landry
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David S Yu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, GA, USA ; 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ; 4 Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA ; 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 6 Department of Biomedical Informatics, 7 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 8 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bosch LJW, Luo Y, Lao VV, Snaebjornsson P, Trooskens G, Vlassenbroeck I, Mongera S, Tang W, Welcsh P, Herman JG, Koopman M, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA, van Criekinge W, Meijer GA, Monnat RJ, Carvalho B, Grady WM. WRN Promoter CpG Island Hypermethylation Does Not Predict More Favorable Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Irinotecan-Based Therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:4612-22. [PMID: 27121793 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 03/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE WRN promoter CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal cancer has been reported to increase sensitivity to irinotecan-based therapies. We aimed to characterize methylation of the WRN promoter, determine the effect of WRN promoter hypermethylation upon expression, and validate a previous report that WRN promoter hypermethylation predicts improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with irinotecan-based therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN WRN methylation status was assessed using methylation-specific PCR and bisulfite sequencing assays. WRN expression was determined using qRT-PCR and Western blotting. WRN methylation status was correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 183 patients with mCRC. Among these patients, 90 received capecitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy, and 93 received capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) therapy as part of the CAIRO phase III clinical trial. RESULTS WRN mRNA and WRN protein expression levels were low in colorectal cancer cell lines and in primary colorectal cancer and were largely independent of WRN methylation status. Patients with methylated WRN colorectal cancer had a shorter OS compared with patients who had unmethylated WRN colorectal cancer (HR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.2; P = 0.003). Patients with unmethylated WRN showed a significantly longer PFS when treated with CAPIRI compared with capecitabine alone (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70; P = 0.0001). In contrast, patients did not benefit from adding irinotecan to capecitabine when WRN was methylated (HR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.69-1.77; P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS WRN expression is largely independent of WRN promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Moreover, we could not validate the previous finding that WRN promoter hypermethylation predicts improved clinical outcomes of mCRC treated with irinotecan-based therapy and found instead the opposite result. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4612-22. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yanxin Luo
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Victoria V Lao
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Trooskens
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Sandra Mongera
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Weiliang Tang
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington
| | - Piri Welcsh
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. MDxHealth SA, Liège, Belgium
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raymond J Monnat
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - William M Grady
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
MiR expression profiles of paired primary colorectal cancer and metastases by next-generation sequencing. Oncogenesis 2015; 4:e170. [PMID: 26436952 PMCID: PMC4632090 DOI: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRs) have been recognized as promising biomarkers. It is unknown to what extent tumor-derived miRs are differentially expressed between primary colorectal cancers (pCRCs) and metastatic lesions, and to what extent the expression profiles of tumor tissue differ from the surrounding normal tissue. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 220 fresh-frozen samples, including paired primary and metastatic tumor tissue and non-tumorous tissue from 38 patients, revealed expression of 2245 known unique mature miRs and 515 novel candidate miRs. Unsupervised clustering of miR expression profiles of pCRC tissue with paired metastases did not separate the two entities, whereas unsupervised clustering of miR expression profiles of pCRC with normal colorectal mucosa demonstrated complete separation of the tumor samples from their paired normal mucosa. Two hundred and twenty-two miRs differentiated both pCRC and metastases from normal tissue samples (false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05). The highest expressed tumor-specific miRs were miR-21 and miR-92a, both previously described to be involved in CRC with potential as circulating biomarker for early detection. Only eight miRs, 0.5% of the analysed miR transcriptome, were differentially expressed between pCRC and the corresponding metastases (FDR <0.1), consisting of five known miRs (miR-320b, miR-320d, miR-3117, miR-1246 and miR-663b) and three novel candidate miRs (chr 1-2552-5p, chr 8-20656-5p and chr 10-25333-3p). These results indicate that previously unrecognized candidate miRs expressed in advanced CRC were identified using NGS. In addition, miR expression profiles of pCRC and metastatic lesions are highly comparable and may be of similar predictive value for prognosis or response to treatment in patients with advanced CRC.
Collapse
|
16
|
High Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Genes Affected by Chromosomal Breaks in Colorectal Cancer. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0138141. [PMID: 26375816 PMCID: PMC4574474 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is caused by somatic DNA alterations such as gene point mutations, DNA copy number aberrations (CNA) and structural variants (SVs). Genome-wide analyses of SVs in large sample series with well-documented clinical information are still scarce. Consequently, the impact of SVs on carcinogenesis and patient outcome remains poorly understood. This study aimed to perform a systematic analysis of genes that are affected by CNA-associated chromosomal breaks in colorectal cancer (CRC) and to determine the clinical relevance of recurrent breakpoint genes. Methods Primary CRC samples of patients with metastatic disease from CAIRO and CAIRO2 clinical trials were previously characterized by array-comparative genomic hybridization. These data were now used to determine the prevalence of CNA-associated chromosomal breaks within genes across 352 CRC samples. In addition, mutation status of the commonly affected APC, TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, FBXW7, SMAD4, BRAF and NRAS genes was determined for 204 CRC samples by targeted massive parallel sequencing. Clinical relevance was assessed upon stratification of patients based on gene mutations and gene breakpoints that were observed in >3% of CRC cases. Results In total, 748 genes were identified that were recurrently affected by chromosomal breaks (FDR <0.1). MACROD2 was affected in 41% of CRC samples and another 169 genes showed breakpoints in >3% of cases, indicating that prevalence of gene breakpoints is comparable to the prevalence of well-known gene point mutations. Patient stratification based on gene breakpoints and point mutations revealed one CRC subtype with very poor prognosis. Conclusions We conclude that CNA-associated chromosomal breaks within genes represent a highly prevalent and clinically relevant subset of SVs in CRC.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cardone C, Martini G, Troiani T, Napolitano S, Selvaggi F, Ciardiello F, Martinelli E. Genetic Landscape of Primary Versus Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: to What Extent Are They Concordant? CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-015-0278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
18
|
Haan JC, Labots M, Rausch C, Koopman M, Tol J, Mekenkamp LJM, van de Wiel MA, Israeli D, van Essen HF, van Grieken NCT, Voorham QJM, Bosch LJW, Qu X, Kabbarah O, Verheul HMW, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA, Ylstra B, Meijer GA. Genomic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 2014; 5:5457. [PMID: 25394515 PMCID: PMC4243240 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Response to drug therapy in individual colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is associated with tumour biology. Here we describe the genomic landscape of tumour samples of a homogeneous well-annotated series of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) of two phase III clinical trials, CAIRO and CAIRO2. DNA copy number aberrations of 349 patients are determined. Within three treatment arms, 194 chromosomal subregions are associated with progression-free survival (PFS; uncorrected single-test P-values <0.005). These subregions are filtered for effect on messenger RNA expression, using an independent data set from The Cancer Genome Atlas which returned 171 genes. Three chromosomal regions are associated with a significant difference in PFS between treatment arms with or without irinotecan. One of these regions, 6q16.1–q21, correlates in vitro with sensitivity to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. This genomic landscape of mCRC reveals a number of DNA copy number aberrations associated with response to drug therapy. Response to drug therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been associated with tumour heterogeneity. Here the authors analyse DNA copy number aberrations in primary tumours from CRC patients and identify genetic variants that influence drug response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josien C Haan
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariette Labots
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Rausch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Route 452, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie J M Mekenkamp
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 824, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A van de Wiel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle Israeli
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik F van Essen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Quirinus J M Voorham
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Xueping Qu
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA
| | - Omar Kabbarah
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Huispost 824, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Neste L, Van Criekinge W. We are all individuals... bioinformatics in the personalized medicine era. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2014; 38:29-37. [PMID: 25204962 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-014-0195-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The medical landscape is evolving at a rapid pace, creating the opportunity for more personalized patient treatment and shifting the way healthcare is approached and thought about. With the availability of (epi)genome-wide, transcriptomic and proteogenomic profiling techniques detailed characterization of a disease at the level of the individual is now possible, offering the opportunity for truly tailored approaches for treatment and patient care. While improvements are still expected, the techniques and the basic analytical tools have reached a state that these can be efficiently deployed in both routine research and clinical practice. Still, some major challenges remain. Notably, holistic approaches, integrating data from several sources, e.g. genomic and epigenomic, will increase the understanding of the underlying biological concepts and provide insight into the causes, effects and effective solutions. However, creating and validating such a knowledge base, potentially for different levels of expertise, and integrating several data points into meaningful information is not trivial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leander Van Neste
- Department of Pathology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
| | | |
Collapse
|