The impact of drug reimbursement policy on rates of testosterone replacement therapy among older men

Testosterone Therapy Is Associated With Increased Odds of Quadriceps Tendon Injury

BACKGROUND

Anabolic steroid use at supraphysiologic doses has been associated with an increased risk of tendon injury. However, the musculoskeletal effects of testosterone therapy in the clinical setting are not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is prescription testosterone associated with a higher odds of subsequent quadriceps muscle or tendon injury? (2) Is prescription testosterone associated with a higher odds of surgical repair of the quadriceps tendon?

METHODS

The PearlDiver Database, which contains data on Medicaid, Medicare, and commercially insured patients, allows for a large representative sample of the US population including both publicly and privately insured patients. The database was queried for all patients between 2011 and 2018 who filled a testosterone prescription. Additionally, all quadriceps injuries using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes between 2011 and 2018 were queried. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and specific comorbidities allowed us to create matched control groups. We used the t-test and chi-square analysis to compare the unmatched and matched cohorts. A total of 151,797 patients (123,627 male patients and 28,170 female patients) with a history of filled testosterone prescriptions were included in the study after matching with the control group, which was of equal size and representation of age, male-female proportions, and comorbidities. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare odds of quadriceps injury and quadriceps tendon repair among the testosterone groups to that of their respective control groups by age and sex.

RESULTS

Within 1 year of filling prescriptions for testosterone, 0.06% (97 of 151,797) of patients experienced a quadriceps injury compared with less than 0.01% (18 of 151,797) of patients in the control group (OR 5.4 [95% CI 3.4 to 9.2]; p < 0.001). Within the sex-specific matched groups, filling a testosterone prescription was associated with an increase in the odds of quadriceps injury in male patients within 1 year of the prescription (OR 5.8 [95% CI 3.5 to 10.3]; p < 0.001). Additionally, patients who filled a testosterone prescription were at increased risk of having quadriceps tendon repair within a year of the injury than were patients in the matched control group (OR 4.7 [95% CI 2.0 to 13.8]; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Considering these findings, it is important for physicians to counsel patients receiving testosterone replacement therapy of the substantially increased odds of quadriceps tendon injury. Future investigations into the mechanisms of influence of exogenous anabolic steroids on tendon injury remains of interest.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The Relationship Between Testosterone Therapy and Rotator Cuff Tears, Repairs, and Revision Repairs

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of rotator cuff tears (RCTs), repairs (RCRs), and revision RCR in patients who were prescribed testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and compare these patients with a control group.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who were prescribed testosterone for at least 90 days between 2011 and 2018 to evaluate the incidence of RCTs in this population. A second analysis evaluated patients who sustained RCTs using International Classification of Diseases, 9th/10th codes to evaluate these patients for rates of RCR and revision RCR. Chi square analysis and multivariate regression analyses were used to compare rates of RCTs, RCR, and subsequent or revision RCR between the testosterone and control groups, with a P -value of 0.05 representing statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 673,862 patients with RCT were included for analysis, and 9,168 of these patients were prescribed testosterone for at least 90 days before their RCT. The TRT group had a 3.6 times greater risk of sustaining an RCT (1.14% versus 0.19%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.57 to 3.96). A 1.6 times greater rate of RCR was observed in the TRT cohort (TRT, 46.4% RCR rate and control, 34.0% RCR rate; adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.54 to 1.67). The TRT cohort had a 26.7 times greater risk of undergoing a subsequent RCR, irrespective of laterality, within 1 year of undergoing a primary RCR when compared with the control group (TRT, 47.1% and control, 4.0%; adjusted OR 26.4; 95% CI 25.0 to 27.9, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is increased risk of RCTs, RCRs, and subsequent RCRs in patients prescribed testosterone. This finding may represent a musculoskeletal consequence of TRT and is important for patients and clinicians to understand. Additional research into the science of tendon injury in the setting of exogenous anabolic steroids remains of interest.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical characteristics and comorbidities associated with testosterone prescribing in men

OBJECTIVE

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is recommended for the treatment of symptomatic hypogonadism in men. Data on prescription behaviours are, however, limited and conflicting. The objective of this study was to investigate clinical characteristics associated with the likelihood of being prescribed TRT by general practitioners (GP) in North-West London (NWL).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Discover database of GP-registered patients in NWL between 2015 and 2019.

PATIENTS

We identified 20,299 men aged ≥18 years with serum total testosterone measurement (TT) and without prior TRT prescription records.

MEASUREMENTS

We determined whether TRT was subsequently commenced, while analysing clinical characteristics related to hypogonadism.

RESULTS

Of all men having TT measurement, 19,583 (96.4%) were not commenced on TRT (Group A) and 716 (3.5%) men were commenced on TRT (Group B). Men prescribed TRT (Group B) had higher mean age, body mass index (BMI) and higher risks of hypertension, depression type 2 diabetes and ischaemic heart disease; conversely, men in Group B had lower mean pretreatment TT and were less likely to have prostate cancer. Four-hundred and thirty-six men (24.3%) with TT < 8 nmol/L and symptoms of low libido were not prescribed TRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights several factors which may influence the decisions made by clinicians when initiating TRT in primary care. Clearer guidance for clinicians may help to improve the consistency of treatment of men with hypogonadism.

Androgen Misuse and Abuse

Androgens are potent drugs requiring prescription for valid medical indications but are misused for invalid, unproven, or off-label reasons as well as being abused without prescription for illicit nonmedical application for performance or image enhancement. Following discovery and first clinical application of testosterone in the 1930s, commercialization of testosterone and synthetic androgens proliferated in the decades after World War II. It remains among the oldest marketed drugs in therapeutic use, yet after 8 decades of clinical use, the sole unequivocal indication for testosterone remains in replacement therapy for pathological hypogonadism, organic disorders of the male reproductive system. Nevertheless, wider claims assert unproven, unsafe, or implausible benefits for testosterone, mostly representing wishful thinking about rejuvenation. Over recent decades, this created an epidemic of testosterone misuse involving prescription as a revitalizing tonic for anti-aging, sexual dysfunction and/or obesity, where efficacy and safety remains unproven and doubtful. Androgen abuse originated during the Cold War as an epidemic of androgen doping among elite athletes for performance enhancement before the 1980s when it crossed over into the general community to become an endemic variant of drug abuse in sufficiently affluent communities that support an illicit drug industry geared to bodybuilding and aiming to create a hypermasculine body physique and image. This review focuses on the misuse of testosterone, defined as prescribing without valid clinical indications, and abuse of testosterone or synthetic androgens (androgen abuse), defined as the illicit use of androgens without prescription or valid indications, typically by athletes, bodybuilders and others for image-oriented, cosmetic, or occupational reasons.

Impact of a Publicly Funded Herpes Zoster Immunization Program on the Burden of Disease in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Study

Background

In September 2009, a live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (ZVL) became available in Canada. Beginning in September 2016, ZVL was made available to all Ontario residents aged 65–70 through a publicly funded immunization program. We assessed the impact of ZVL availability and its subsequent public funding on herpes zoster burden in this population.

Methods

A population-based study of Ontario residents aged 65–70 between January 2005 and September 2018. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of ZVL market availability and the publicly funded ZVL program on monthly incidence rate of medically attended herpes zoster, defined as an outpatient visit for herpes zoster with a prescription for a herpes zoster antiviral dispensed ≤5 days before or after the visit, or a herpes zoster–related emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization. In secondary analyses, we examined impacts on any herpes zoster–related ED visits and hospitalizations.

Results

We found no association between ZVL market availability and monthly incidence of herpes zoster (P = .32) or monthly rates of ED visits and hospitalizations (P = .88). Conversely, the introduction of publicly funded ZVL reduced the monthly rate of medically attended herpes zoster by 19.1% (from 4.8 to 3.8 per 10 000 population; P < .01) and herpes zoster–related ED visits and hospitalizations by 38.2% (from 1.7 to 1.0 per 10 000 population; P < .05).

Conclusions

The introduction of a publicly funded immunization program for herpes zoster was associated with reduced disease burden and related acute healthcare service use.

Risks of Serious Injury with Testosterone Treatment

BACKGROUND

Injury causes significant morbidity and mortality that is sometimes attributed to testosterone and violence. We hypothesized that prescribed testosterone might be associated with the subsequent risk of serious injury.

METHODS

We conducted a self-matched individual-patient exposure-crossover analysis comparing injury risks before and after initiation of testosterone. We selected adults treated with testosterone in Ontario, Canada, from October 1, 2012, to October 1, 2017 (enrollment) and continued until October 1, 2018 (follow-up). The primary outcome was defined as an acute traumatic event that required emergency medical care.

RESULTS

A total of 64,386 patients were treated with testosterone of whom 89% were men with a median age of 52 years. We identified 34,439 serious injuries during the baseline interval before starting testosterone (584 per month) and 7349 serious injuries during the subsequent interval after starting testosterone (565 per month). Rates of injuries were substantially above the population norm in both intervals with no significant increased risk after starting testosterone (relative risk = 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.04, P = 0.850). The unchanged risk extended to diverse patients, was observed for different formulations and applied to all injury mechanisms. In contrast, testosterone treatment was associated with a 48% increased risk of a thromboembolic event (relative risk = 1.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone treatment was associated with a substantial baseline risk of serious injury that did not increase further after starting therapy. Physicians prescribing testosterone could consider basic safety reminders to mitigate injury risks.

Trends and Patterns of Testosterone Therapy among U.S. Male Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999 to 2014

PURPOSE

We explored the Medicare database (1999 to 2014) to provide a comprehensive assessment of testosterone therapy patterns in the older U.S. male population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We estimated annual age-standardized incidence (new users) and prevalence (existing users) of testosterone therapy according to demographic characteristics, comorbidities and potential indications.

RESULTS

There were 392,698 incident testosterone therapy users during 88 million person-years. Testosterone therapy users were predominantly younger, white nonHispanic, and located in South and West U.S. Census regions. On average testosterone therapy use increased dramatically during 2007 to 2014 (average annual percent change 15.5%), despite a decrease in 2014. In 2014 the most common recorded potential indications for any testosterone therapy were hypogonadism (48%), fatigue (18%), erectile dysfunction (15%), depression (4%) and psychosexual dysfunction (1%). Laboratory tests to measure circulating testosterone concentrations for testosterone therapy were infrequent with 35% having had at least 1 testosterone test in the 120 days preceding testosterone therapy, 4% the recommended 2 pre-testosterone therapy tests, and 16% at least 1 pre-testosterone therapy test and at least 1 post-testosterone therapy test.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone therapy remains common in the older U.S. male population, despite a recent decrease. Although testosterone therapy prescriptions are predominantly for hypogonadism, a substantial proportion appear to be for less specific conditions. Testosterone tests among men prescribed testosterone therapy appear to be infrequent.

An analysis of online content related to testosterone supplementation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the quality of online information on testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in men.

METHODS

A quantitative content analysis was conducted on websites providing patient-directed information on TRT for the purpose of treating late onset hypogonadism (LOH). Websites were identified through Google in March 2017. The DISCERN instrument was used to determine the quality of health information.

RESULTS

A total of 20 websites met inclusion criteria. Websites were primarily from the United States (45%), United Kingdom (25%), and Australia (15%). Sources of information were cited by 40% of websites. Several websites (40%) claimed that TRT had benefits, with 25% claiming that TRT was effective for treating LOH. TRT was described as a safe therapy by one website (5%), with gynecomastia (35%) and increased hematocrit (35%) representing the most commonly described side effects. Prostate specific antigen (35%) and serum testosterone monitoring (30%) were the most commonly described monitoring parameters. The mean DISCERN score was 46.4, indicating fair quality information. The Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level was 12.2.

CONCLUSION

Online TRT information is incomplete, often failing to describe important safety information and the need for regular monitoring.

The Impact of the Choosing Wisely Campaign in Urology

OBJECTIVE

To determine if 3 of the Canadian Urological Association's Choosing Wisely recommendations (released in 2013-2014) related to urologic care altered physician and patient behavior.

METHODS

Administrative data from Ontario, Canada between 2008 and 2017 was used. We identified 3 cohorts: First, we determined how many men >66 years of age had a serum testosterone level before starting testosterone therapy. Second, we determined how many boys undergoing an orchiopexy underwent abdominal imaging before their surgery. Third, we determined how many men with low risk prostate cancer underwent a Bone Scan after diagnosis. Piece-wise linear regression was used to evaluate for a significant change after Choosing Wisely.

RESULTS

We identified 13,113 men who had their initial prescription for testosterone filled. Serum testosterone measurement increased over time, from approximately 43% to 68%. There were 9319 boys who underwent an orchiopexy. The use of pre-orchiopexy ultrasound was generally stable (approximately 55%). We identified 27,174 men with low risk prostate cancer. The use of bone scans after diagnosis decreased over time from approximately 24% to 20%. In all 3 of these groups, there was no significant change after Choosing Wisely (P = .74, P = .70, P = .72 respectively).

CONCLUSION

In Ontario, there was no evidence of a significant change in 3 practice patterns that were featured in Choosing Wisely Urology recommendations. Further thought may be needed on how to translate these and future recommendations into behavior change.

Impact of Health Authority Control Measures Aimed at Reducing the Illicit Use of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate two interventions on anabolic-androgenic-steroids (AAS) dispensation in retail pharmacies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted in a north-western region of Spain. Data were the AAS supplied by wholesale drug distributors to retail pharmacies over a period of 102 months. It is designed as an ecological time-series study; the dependent variables were daily defined doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day of each drug. The two interventions evaluated were: (1) an inspection program intended for those retail pharmacies where there was an irregular dispensation and (2) a regulation put forth forcing these pharmacies to carry out additional registers. The medications studied were stanozolol, nandrolone, methenolone, testosterone and mesterolone.

RESULTS

The pre-intervention use of AAS displayed a rising trend. There was an immediate reduction of 30.56% after the first intervention, and a further reduction of 35.25% after the second. There was a seasonal pattern of use in the pre-intervention period, pointing to an increased demand at the end of spring and beginning of summer. The most abused drugs were stanozolol and nandrolone.

CONCLUSION

The health actions were very effective, in that they brought about a sharp reduction in the illicit use of AAS. These interventions could be applied to other drugs in which abuse were detected.

Patterns of testosterone prescription overuse

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been an increase in the prescribing of testosterone therapy in the past decade. There is concern that at least part of this increase is driven by advertising rather than sound medical practice. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent trends in testosterone prescribing, and to examine whether testosterone is being appropriately prescribed as per guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both global and U.S. data reflect an overall increase in the use of testosterone in the last decade, although there are early signs of a decline in testosterone sales since 2014. This increased prescribing has been accompanied with an overall increase in testing for testosterone levels, prescription of testosterone without the appropriate diagnostic evaluation recommended by clinical practice guidelines, and apparent use of this therapy for unproven medical conditions.

SUMMARY

Research to date suggests that there is room to improve our prescribing of testosterone. Greater understanding of the potential provider-level and system-level factors that contribute to the current prescribing practices may help accomplish such improvement.

Survival and cardiovascular events in men treated with testosterone replacement therapy: an intention-to-treat observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence exists for the association between testosterone replacement therapy and mortality and cardiovascular events. The US Food and Drug Administration recently cautioned that testosterone replacement therapy might increase risk of heart attack and stroke, based on evidence from studies with short treatment duration and follow-up. No previous study has assessed the effect of duration of testosterone treatment on these outcomes. We aimed to assess the association between long-term use of testosterone replacement therapy and mortality, cardiovascular events, and prostate cancer diagnoses, using a time-varying exposure analysis.

METHODS

We did a population-based matched cohort study of men aged 66 years or older newly treated with testosterone replacement therapy and controls matched for age, region of residence, comorbidity, diabetes status, and index year from 2007-12 in Ontario, Canada, using data from the Ontario Drug Benefit database, the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database, the CIHI National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan database, the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database, the Ontario Diabetes Database, the Ontario Cancer Registry, and the Registered Persons database. We assessed the association between cumulative testosterone replacement therapy exposure and mortality, cardiovascular events, and prostate cancer using marginal models with a time-varying testosterone exposure.

FINDINGS

We included 10 311 men treated with testosterone replacement therapy and 28 029 controls between Jan 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012. Over a median follow-up of 5·3 years (IQR 3·6-7·5) in the testosterone replacement therapy group and 5·1 years (3·4-7·4) in the control group, patients treated with testosterone replacement therapy had lower mortality than did controls (hazard ratio [HR] 0·88, 95% CI 0·84-0·93). Patients in the lowest tertile of testosterone exposure had increased risk of mortality (HR 1·11, 95% CI 1·03-1·20) and cardiovascular events (HR 1·26, 95% CI 1·09-1·46) compared with controls. By contrast, those in the highest tertile of testosterone exposure had decreased risk of mortality (HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·62-0·73) and cardiovascular events (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·72-0·98), with a significant trend across tertiles (p<0·0001). Risk of prostate cancer diagnosis was decreased for those with the highest tertile of exposure (HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·45-0·80) compared with controls, but not for those with the shortest exposure.

INTERPRETATION

Long-term exposure to testosterone replacement therapy was associated with reduced risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and prostate cancer. However, testosterone replacement therapy increased the risk of mortality and cardiovascular events with short durations of therapy. In view of the limitations of observational data and the potential for selection bias, these results warrant confirmation in a randomised trial.

FUNDING

Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation and Ajmera Family Chair in Urologic Oncology.

Factors that may be influencing the rise in prescription testosterone replacement therapy in adult men: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore and describe the factors that may be influencing the rise of prescribing and use of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in adult men.

DESIGN

A rapid qualitative research design using semi-structured interviews with providers and patients.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine men who have used TRT (referred to as "patients"), and six primary care clinicians and seven specialists (collectively referred to as "providers") who prescribed or administered TRT.

METHOD

Patients' and providers' perspectives were investigated through semi-structured interviews. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit all participants. We conducted qualitative analysis using the framework approach for applied health research.

MAIN FINDINGS

Participants perceived the following factors to have influenced TRT prescriptions and use in adult men: provider factors (diagnostic ambiguity of age-related hypogonadism and beliefs about appropriateness of TRT) and patient factors (access to information on TRT and drug seeking behavior). They perceived that these factors have perpetuated a rise in prescription in the absence of clear clinical guidelines and unclear research evidence on the safety and efficacy of TRT.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study highlight that much work still needs to be done to improve diagnostic accuracy and encourage appropriate TRT prescription in adult men. In addition, both patients and providers need more information about the risks and long-term effects of TRT in men.

Testosterone therapy in the new era of Food and Drug Administration oversight

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) introduced changes in labeling and indications for use to testosterone products in 2015 due to a possible increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. This decision was made based on six clinical studies—some that supported an increased CV risk, and some that did not. Since this decision, additional studies have been published examining the interplay between hypogonadism, CV risk, and testosterone, demonstrating that the risk may be lower than originally estimated. Clinicians are placed in a difficult position, as studies support an increased mortality risk in hypogonadal men, but also an increased risk of CV events in men on testosterone therapy. As a result, many clinicians will be more selective in their prescribing of testosterone. In this review, we examine how these new guidelines arose and how they may affect prescribing habits.

Variations in costs and use of provincially-funded testosterone replacement therapy across Canada: a population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Provincial drug-program policies for the reimbursement of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) vary across Canada, which may result in marked regional variability in use.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cross-sectional analysis of provincially funded TRT spending and utilization in eight provinces across Canada in 2012. We reported the annual cost per user, total cost, and rate of use of TRT overall and by formulation.

RESULTS

We identified 23,544 provincially-funded recipients of TRT in 2012 in the eight provinces studied. Average annual cost per person varied by 3-fold, ranging from $173 (Prince Edward Island) to $485 (Ontario). Ontario also had the highest rate of use (1,105 users per 100,000 eligible) and the most liberal listing. Provinces with more restricted access (Alberta, British Columbia, and PEI) had lower annual costs per user ($293, $206, $173, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Differing reimbursement policies for TRT products across Canada are likely contributing to variation in the rate of use and cost per recipient.

Testosterone prescribing in the population-a short social epidemiological analysis in Sweden

PURPOSE

In recent years, there has been an increased interest for use of pharmaceutical testosterone among elderly men. However, it is still scarcely studied if this use is conditioned by socioeconomic factors in the general population of elderly men.

METHODS

Using individual-level data from a population-based cohort of men aged 65-84 years in the County Scania, Sweden, we analysed testosterone use in 2006 in relation to demographic and socioeconomic factors by means of multiple logistic regression. We also analysed national data at the ecological level to investigate trends in prescribing between 2006 and 2014.

RESULTS

The prevalence of testosterone use in Sweden among 65- to 84-year-old men increased by 83%, from 3.3 per 1000 men in 2006 to 6.0 in 2014. Testosterone use was more than twice as common in men in the highest income quintile compared with those in the lowest (0.68% versus 0.25%, odds ratio 2.69 and 95% confidence interval 1.80-4.02). Besides in the high-income group, testosterone use was highest in 65- to 69-year-old men, divorced men and, specially, in men with a previous hospital diagnose of hypogonadism.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show socioeconomic inequities in prescription of testosterone. This is a short analysis based on limited data, but because information on this topic is scarce, our analysis adds a relevant piece of evidence and highlights the need for further research.