Identification of ALK gene alterations in urothelial carcinoma

Genomic Profiling and Molecular Characterisation of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

The clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is undergoing a major paradigm shift; the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) into the mUC therapeutic strategy has succeeded in improving platinum-based chemotherapy outcomes. Given the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, it is crucial to identify efficacy-predictive biomarkers that can guide an individual patient's therapeutic strategy. We reviewed the literature data on mUC genomic alterations of clinical interest, discussing their prognostic and predictive role. In particular, we explored the role of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family, epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis, DNA repair genes, and microsatellite instability. Currently, based on the available clinical data, FGFR inhibitors and HER2-directed ADCs are effective therapeutic options for later lines of biomarker-driven mUC. However, emerging genomic data highlight the opportunity for earlier use and/or combination with other drugs of both FGFR inhibitors and HER2-directed ADCs and also reveal additional potential drug targets that could change mUC management.

Clinical impact of copy number variation changes in bladder cancer samples

The aim of the present study was to detect copy number variations (CNVs) related to tumour progression and metastasis of urothelial carcinoma through whole-genome scanning. A total of 30 bladder cancer samples staged from pTa to pT4 were included in the study. DNA was extracted from freshly frozen tissue via standard phenol-chloroform extraction and CNV analysis was performed on two alternative platforms (CytoChip Oligo aCGH, 4x44K and Infinium OncoArray-500K BeadChip; Illumina, Inc.). Data were analysed with BlueFuse Multi software and Karyostudio, respectively. The results highlight the role of genomic imbalances in regions containing genes with metastatic and proliferative potential for tumour invasion. A high level of genomic instability in uroepithelial tumours was observed and a total of 524 aberrations, including 175 losses and 349 gains, were identified. The most prevalent genetic imbalances affected the following regions: 1p, 1q, 2q, 4p, 4q, 5p, 5q, 6p, 6q, 7q, 8q, 9p, 9q, 10p, 10q, 11q, 13q and 17q. High-grade tumours more frequently harboured genomic imbalances (n=227) than low-grade tumours (n=103). A total of 36 CNVs in high-grade bladder tumours were detected in chromosomes 1-5, 8-11, 14, 17, 19 and 20. Furthermore, five loss of heterozygosity variants containing 176 genes were observed in high-grade bladder cancer and may be used as potential targets for precision therapy. Revealing specific chromosomal regions related to the metastatic potential of uroepithelial tumours may lay a foundation for implementing molecular CNV profiling of bladder tumours as part of a routine progression risk estimation strategy, thus expanding the personalized therapeutic approach.

Novel Tyrosine Kinase Targets in Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma represents one of the most prevalent types of cancer worldwide, and its incidence is expected to grow. Although the treatment of the advanced disease was based on chemotherapy for decades, the developments of different therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody drug conjugates and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are revolutionizing the therapeutic landscape of this tumor. This development coincides with the increasing knowledge of the pathogenesis and genetic alterations in urothelial carcinoma, from the non-muscle invasive setting to the metastatic one. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the different tyrosine kinase targets and their roles in the therapeutic scene of urothelial carcinoma.

Clinical, Sonographic, and Pathological Characteristics of RAS-Positive Versus BRAF-Positive Thyroid Carcinoma

CONTEXT

Mutations in the BRAF and RAS oncogenes are responsible for most well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet, our clinical understanding of how BRAF-positive and RAS-positive thyroid cancers differ is incomplete.

OBJECTIVE

We correlated clinical, radiographic, and pathological findings from patients with thyroid cancer harboring a BRAF or RAS mutation.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 101 consecutive patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

We compared the clinical, sonographic, and pathological characteristics of patients with BRAF-positive cancer to those with RAS-positive cancer.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients harboring these mutations, 71 were BRAF-positive, whereas 30 were RAS-positive. Upon sonographic evaluation, RAS-positive nodules were significantly larger (P = .04), although BRAF-positive nodules were more likely to harbor concerning sonographic characteristics (hypoechogenicity [P < .001]; irregular margins [P = .04]). Cytologically, 70% of BRAF-positive nodules were classified positive for PTC, whereas 87% of RAS-positive nodules were indeterminate (P < .001). Histologically, 96% of RAS-positive PTC malignancies were follicular variants of PTC, whereas 70% of BRAF-positive malignancies were classical variants of PTC. BRAF-positive malignancies were more likely to demonstrate extrathyroidal extension (P = .003), lymphovascular invasion (P = .02), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF-positive malignant nodules most often demonstrate worrisome sonographic features and are frequently associated with positive or suspicious Bethesda cytology. In contrast, RAS-positive malignancy most often demonstrates indolent sonographic features and more commonly associates with lower risk, "indeterminate" cytology. Because BRAF and RAS mutations are the most common molecular perturbations associated with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, these findings may assist with improved preoperative risk assessment by suggesting the likely molecular profile of a thyroid cancer, even when postsurgical molecular analysis is unavailable.

Identification of Novel Oncogenic Mutations in Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Thyroid cancer patients frequently have favorable outcomes. However, a small subset develops aggressive disease refractory to traditional treatments. Therefore, we sought to characterize oncogenic mutations in thyroid cancers to identify novel therapeutic targets that may benefit patients with advanced, refractory disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on 239 thyroid cancer specimens collected between January 2009 and September 2014 were obtained from the Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center. The tumors were analyzed with the OncoMap-4 or OncoPanel high-throughput genotyping platforms that survey up to 275 cancer genes and 91 introns for DNA rearrangement.

RESULTS

Of the 239 thyroid cancer specimens, 128 (54%) had oncogenic mutations detected. These 128 tumors had 351 different mutations detected in 129 oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Examination of the 128 specimens demonstrated that 55% (n = 70) had 1 oncogenic mutation, and 45% (n = 48) had more than 1 mutation. The 351 oncogenic mutations were in papillary (85%), follicular (4%), medullary (7%), and anaplastic (4%) thyroid cancers. Analysis revealed that 2.3% (n = 3 genes) of the somatic gene mutations were novel. These included AR (n = 1), MPL (n = 2), and EXT2 (n = 1), which were present in 4 different papillary thyroid cancer specimens. New mutations were found in an additional 13 genes known to have altered protein expression in thyroid cancer: BLM, CBL, CIITA, EP300, GSTM5, LMO2, PRAME, SBDS, SF1, TET2, TNFAIP3, XPO1, and ZRSR2.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis revealed that several previously unreported oncogenic gene mutations exist in thyroid cancers and may be targets for the development of future therapies. Further investigation into the role of these genes is warranted.