Association between different indexations of extravascular lung water (EVLW) and PaO2/FiO2: a two-center study in 231 patients

Extravascular lung water levels are associated with mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of extravascular lung water (EVLW) measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in critically ill patients is debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the effects of TPTD-estimated EVLW on mortality in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Cohort studies published in English from Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1960 to 1 June 2021 were systematically searched. From eligible studies, the values of the odds ratio (OR) of EVLW as a risk factor for mortality, and the value of EVLW in survivors and non-survivors were extracted. Pooled OR were calculated from available studies. Mean differences and standard deviation of the EVLW between survivors and non-survivors were calculated. A random effects model was computed on the weighted mean differences across the two groups to estimate the pooled size effect. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 18 studies included (1296 patients), OR could be extracted from 11 studies including 905 patients (464 survivors vs. 441 non-survivors), and 17 studies reported EVLW values of survivors and non-survivors, including 1246 patients (680 survivors vs. 566 non-survivors). The pooled OR of EVLW for mortality from eleven studies was 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.22; 2.34], p < 0.0015). EVLW was significantly lower in survivors than non-survivors, with a mean difference of -4.97 mL/kg (95% CI [-6.54; -3.41], p < 0.001). The results regarding OR and mean differences were consistent in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The value of EVLW measured by TPTD is associated with mortality in critically ill patients and is significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. This finding may also be interpreted as an indirect confirmation of the reliability of TPTD for estimating EVLW at the bedside. Nevertheless, our results should be considered cautiously due to the high risk of bias of many studies included in the meta-analysis and the low rating of certainty of evidence. Trial registration the study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO: CRD42019126985.

Increased extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) reflects rapid non-cardiogenic oedema and mortality in COVID-19 associated ARDS

Nearly 5% of patients suffering from COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) is a marker of pulmonary oedema which is associated with mortality in ARDS. In this study, we evaluate whether EVLWI is higher in patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS as compared to COVID-19 negative, ventilated patients with ARDS and whether EVLWI has the potential to monitor disease progression. EVLWI and cardiac function were monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution in 25 patients with COVID-19 ARDS subsequent to intubation and compared to a control group of 49 non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. At intubation, EVLWI was noticeably elevated and significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in the control group (17 (11–38) vs. 11 (6–26) mL/kg; p < 0.001). High pulmonary vascular permeability index values (2.9 (1.0–5.2) versus 1.9 (1.0–5.2); p = 0.003) suggested a non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. By contrast, the cardiac parameters SVI, GEF and GEDVI were comparable in both cohorts. High EVLWI values were associated with viral persistence, prolonged intensive care treatment and in-hospital mortality (23.2 ± 6.7% vs. 30.3 ± 6.0%, p = 0.025). Also, EVLWI showed a significant between-subjects (r = − 0.60; p = 0.001) and within-subjects correlation (r = − 0.27; p = 0.028) to Horowitz index. Compared to non COVID-19 ARDS, COVID-19 results in markedly elevated EVLWI-values in patients with ARDS. High EVLWI reflects a non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema in COVID-19 ARDS and could serve as parameter to monitor ARDS progression on ICU.

Lung ultrasound score assessing the pulmonary edema in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome received continuous hemofiltration therapy: a prospective observational study

Background

Lung ultrasound score is a potential method for determining pulmonary edema in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become the preferred modality to manage fluid overload during ARDS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) score on assessing the effects of CRRT on pulmonary edema and pulmonary function in pediatric ARDS.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study in 70 children with moderate to severe ARDS in a tertiary university pediatric intensive care unit from January 2016 to December 2019. 37 patients received CRRT (CRRT group) and 33 patients treated by conventional therapy (Non-CRRT group). LUS score was measured within 2 h identified ARDS as the value of 1st, and the following three days as the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. We used Spearman correlation analysis to develop the relationship between LUS score and parameters related to respiratory dynamics, clinical outcomes as well as daily fluid balance during the first four days after ARDS diagnosed.

Results

The 1st LUS score in CRRT group were significantly higher than Non-CRRT group (P < 0.001), but the LUS score decreased gradually following CRRT (P < 0.001). LUS score was significantly correlated with Cdyn (dynamic lung compliance) (1st: r = − 0.757, 2nd: r = − 0.906, 3rd: r = − 0.885, 4th: r = − 0.834), OI (oxygenation index) (1st: r = 0.678, 2nd: r = 0.689, 3rd: r = 0.486, 4th: r = 0.324) based on 1st to 4th values (all P < 0.05). Only values of the 3rd and 4th LUS score after ARDS diagnosed were correlated with duration of mechanical ventilation [1st: r = 0.167, P = 0.325; 2nd: r = 0.299, P = 0.072; 3rd: r = 0.579, P < 0.001; 4th: r = 0.483, P = 0.002]. LUS score decreased from 22 (18–25) to 15 (13–18) and OI decreased from 15.92 (14.07–17.73) to 9.49 (8.70–10.58) after CRRT for four days (both P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LUS score is significantly correlated with lung function parameters in pediatric ARDS. The improvement of pulmonary edema in patient with ARDS received CRRT can be assessed by the LUS score.

Trial registration CCTR, ChiCTR-ONC-16009698. Registered 1 November 2016, prospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=16535&htm=4. This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Prediction of outcome in patients with ARDS: A prospective cohort study comparing ARDS-definitions and other ARDS-associated parameters, ratios and scores at intubation and over time

Background

Early recognition of high-risk-patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) might improve their outcome by less protracted allocation to intensified therapy including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Among numerous predictors and classifications, the American European Consensus Conferenece (AECC)- and Berlin-definitions as well as the oxygenation index (OI) and the Murray-/Lung Injury Score are the most common. Most studies compared the prediction of mortality by these parameters on the day of intubation and/or diagnosis of ARDS. However, only few studies investigated prediction over time, in particular for more than three days.

Objective

Therefore, our study aimed at characterization of the best predictor and the best day(s) to predict 28-days-mortality within four days after intubation of patients with ARDS.

Methods

In 100 consecutive patients with ARDS severity according to OI (mean airway pressure*F_iO₂/p_aO₂), modified Murray-score without radiological points (Murray_mod), AECC- and Berlin-definition, were daily documented for four days after intubation. In the subgroup of 49 patients with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) monitoring (PiCCO), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) was measured daily.

Primary endpoint

Prediction of 28-days-mortality (Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (ROC-AUC)); IBM SPSS 26.

Results

In the totality of patients the best prediction of 28-days-mortality was found on day-1 and day-2 (mean ROC-AUCs for all predictors/scores: 0.632 and 0.620). OI was the best predictor among the ARDS-scores (AUC=0.689 on day-1; 4-day-mean AUC = 0.625). AECC and Murray_mod had 4-day-means AUCs below 0.6. Among the 49 patients with TPTD, EVLWI (4-day-mean AUC=0.696) and OI (4-day-mean AUC=0.695) were the best predictors. AUCs were 0.789 for OI on day-1, and 0.786 for EVLWI on day-2. In binary regression analysis of patients with TPTD, EVLWI (B=-0.105; Wald=7.294; p=0.007) and OI (B=0.124; Wald=7.435; p=0.006) were independently associated with 28-days-mortality. Combining of EVLWI and OI provided ROC-AUCs of 0.801 (day-1) and 0.824 (day-2). Among the totality of patients, the use of TPTD-monitoring „per se“ and a lower SOFA-score were independently associated with a lower 28-days-mortality.

Conclusions

Prognosis of ARDS-patients can be estblished within two days after intubation. The best predictors were EVLWI and OI and their combination. TPTD-monitoring „per se“ was independently associated with reduced mortality.

Transpulmonary thermodilution detects rapid and reversible increases in lung water induced by positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE

It has been suggested that, by recruiting lung regions and enlarging the distribution volume of the cold indicator, increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may lead to an artefactual overestimation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD).

METHODS

In 60 ARDS patients, we measured EVLW (PiCCO2 device) at a PEEP level set to reach a plateau pressure of 30 cmH₂O (HighPEEP_start) and 15 and 45 min after decreasing PEEP to 5 cmH₂O (LowPEEP_15' and LowPEEP_45', respectively). Then, we increased PEEP back to the baseline level (HighPEEP_end). Between HighPEEP_start and LowPEEP_15', we estimated the degree of lung derecruitment either by measuring changes in the compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) in the whole population, or by measuring the lung derecruited volume in 30 patients. We defined patients with a large derecruitment from the other ones as patients in whom the Crs changes and the measured derecruited volume were larger than the median of these variables observed in the whole population.

RESULTS

Reducing PEEP from HighPEEP_start (14 ± 2 cmH₂O) to LowPEEP_15' significantly decreased EVLW from 20 ± 4 to 18 ± 4 mL/kg, central venous pressure (CVP) from 15 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 mmHg, the arterial oxygen tension over inspired oxygen fraction (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio from 184 ± 76 to 150 ± 69 mmHg and lung volume by 144 [68-420] mL. The EVLW decrease was similar in "large derecruiters" and the other patients. When PEEP was re-increased to HighPEEP_end, CVP, PaO₂/FiO₂ and EVLW significantly re-increased. At linear mixed effect model, EVLW changes were significantly determined only by changes in PEEP and CVP (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively, n = 60). When the same analysis was performed by estimating recruitment according to lung volume changes (n = 30), CVP remained significantly associated to the changes in EVLW (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In ARDS patients, changing the PEEP level induced parallel, small and reversible changes in EVLW. These changes were not due to an artefact of the TPTD technique and were likely due to the PEEP-induced changes in CVP, which is the backward pressure of the lung lymphatic drainage. Trial registration ID RCB: 2015-A01654-45. Registered 23 October 2015.

Mandatory criteria for the application of variability-based parameters of fluid responsiveness: a prospective study in different groups of ICU patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Stroke volume variation (SVV) has high sensitivity and specificity in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, sinus rhythm (SR) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CV) are mandatory for their application. Several studies suggest a limited applicability of SVV in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We hypothesized that the applicability of SVV might be different over time and within certain subgroups of ICU patients. Therefore, we analysed the prevalence of SR and CV in ICU patients during the first 24 h of PiCCO-monitoring (primary endpoint) and during the total ICU stay. We also investigated the applicability of SVV in the subgroups of patients with sepsis, cirrhosis, and acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

The prevalence of SR and CV was documented immediately before 1241 thermodilution measurements in 88 patients.

RESULTS

In all measurements, SVV was applicable in about 24%. However, the applicability of SVV was time-dependent: the prevalence of both SR and CV was higher during the first 24 h compared to measurements thereafter (36.1% vs. 21.9%; P<0.001). Within different subgroups, the applicability during the first 24 h of monitoring ranged between 0% in acute pancreatitis, 25.5% in liver failure, and 48.9% in patients without pancreatitis, liver failure, pneumonia or sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The applicability of SVV in a predominantly medical ICU is only about 25%-35%. The prevalence of both mandatory criteria decreases over time during the ICU stay. Furthermore, the applicability is particularly low in patients with acute pancreatitis and liver failure.

Comparison of cardiac function index derived from femoral and jugular indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution with the PiCCO-device: A prospective observational study

Introduction

Cardiac function index (CFI) is a trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived estimate of systolic function. CFI is defined as the ratio of cardiac output divided by global end-diastolic volume GEDV (CFI = CO/GEDV). Several studies demonstrated that the use of femoral venous access results in a marked overestimation of GEDV, while CFI is underestimated. One study suggested a correction formula for femoral venous access that markedly reduced the bias for GEDVI. Therefore, the last PiCCO-algorithm requires information about the CVC-position which suggests a correction of GEDV for femoral access. However, a recent study demonstrated inconsistencies of the last PiCCO algorithm using incorrected GEDV to calculate CFI despite obvious correction of GEDV. Nevertheless, this study was based on mathematical analyses of data displayed in a total of 15 patients equipped with only a femoral, but not with a jugular CVC. Therefore, this study compared CFI derived from the femoral indicator injection TPTD to data derived from jugular indicator injection in 28 patients with both a jugular and a femoral CVC.

Methods

28 ICU-patients with PiCCO-monitoring were included. Each dataset consisted of three triplicate TPTDs using the jugular venous gold standard access and the femoral access with and without information about the femoral indicator injection to evaluate, if correction for femoral GEDV also pertains to CFI. (CFI_jug: jugular indicator injection; CFI_fem: femoral indicator injection; CFI_fem_cor: femoral indicator injection with correct information about CVC-position; CFI_fem_uncor: femoral indicator injection with uncorrect information about CVC-position; CFI_fem_uncor_form = CFI_fem_uncor * (GEDVI_fem_uncor/GEDVI_fem_cor)).

Results

CFI_fem_uncor was significantly lower than CFI_jug (4.28±1.70 vs. 5.21±1.91 min^-1; p<0.001). Similarly, CFI_fem_cor was significantly lower than CFI_jug (4.24±1.62 vs. 5.21±1.91 min^-1; p<0.001). This is explained by the finding that CFI_fem_uncor was not different to CFI_fem_cor (4.28±1.70 vs. 4.24±1.62 min^-1; p = 0.611). This suggests that correction for femoral CVC does not pertain to CFI. Calculative correction of CFI_fem_uncor by multiplying CFI_fem_uncor by the ratio GEDVI_fem_uncor/GEDVI_jug resulted in CFI_fem_uncor_form which was slightly, but significantly different from the gold standard CFI_jug (5.51±2.00 vs. 5.21±1.91 min^-1; p = 0.024). The agreement of measurements classified in the same category of CFI (decreased (<4.5), normal (4.5–6.5) and increased (>6.5 min^-1)) was high for CFI_jug and CFI_fem_uncor_form (identical categories in 26 of 28 comparisons; p = 0.49). By contrast, the agreement with CFI_jug was significantly lower for CFI_fem_cor (14 out of 28; p<0.001) and CFI_fem_uncor (15 out of 28; p<0.001).

Conclusions

While the last PiCCO algorithm obviously corrects GEDVI for femoral indicator injection, this correction is not applied to CFI. Therefore, femoral TPTD indicator injection results in substantially lower values for CFI compared to TPTD using a jugular CVC. Necessarily, uncorrected CFI-values derived from femoral TPTD are misleading and have to be corrected.

Quantitative computed tomography in comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution for the estimation of pulmonary fluid status: a clinical study in critically ill patients

Extravascular lung water (index) (EVLW(I)) can be estimated using transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD). Computed tomography (CT) with quantitative analysis of lung tissue density has been proposed to quantify pulmonary edema. We compared variables of pulmonary fluid status assessed using quantitative CT and TPTD in critically ill patients. In 21 intensive care unit patients, we performed TPTD measurements directly before and after chest CT. Based on the density data of segmented CT images we calculated the tissue volume (TV), tissue volume index (TVI), and the mean weighted index of voxel aqueous density (VMWaq). CT-derived TV, TVI, and VMWaq did not predict TPTD-derived EVLWI values ≥ 14 mL/kg. There was a significant moderate positive correlation between VMWaq and mean EVLWI (EVLWI before and after CT) (r = 0.45, p = 0.042) and EVLWI after CT (r = 0.49, p = 0.025) but not EVLWI before CT (r = 0.38, p = 0.086). There was no significant correlation between TV and EVLW before CT, EVLW after CT, or mean EVLW. There was no significant correlation between TVI and EVLWI before CT, EVLWI after CT, or mean EVLWI. CT-derived variables did not predict elevated TPTD-derived EVLWI values. In unselected critically ill patients, variables of pulmonary fluid status assessed using quantitative CT cannot be used to predict EVLWI.

Accuracy and precision of ScvO2 measured with the CeVOX-device: A prospective study in patients with a wide variation of ScvO2-values

INTRODUCTION

Central-venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is a key parameter of hemodynamic monitoring and has been suggested as therapeutic goal for resuscitation. Several devices offer continuous monitoring features. The CeVOX-device (Pulsion Medical Systems) uses a fibre-optic probe inserted through a conventional central-venous catheter (CVC) to obtain continuous ScvO2.

OBJECTIVES

Since there is a lack of studies validating the CeVOX, we prospectively analyzed data from 24 patients with CeVOX-monitoring. To increase the yield of lower ScvO2-values, 12 patients were equipped with a femoral CVC.

METHODS

During the 8h study period ScvO2_CeVOX was documented immediately before withdrawal of blood to measure ScvO2 by blood gas analysis (ScvO2_BGA) 6min, 1h, 4h, 5h and 8h after the initial calibration. No further calibrations were performed.

RESULTS

In patients with jugular CVC (primary endpoint; 60 measurements), bias, lower and upper limits of agreement (LLOA; ULOA) and percentage error (PE) of the estimate of ScvO2 (ScvO2_CeVOX_jug) were acceptable with 0.45%, -13.0%, 13.9% and 16.6%, respectively. As supposed, ScvO2 was lower in the femoral compared to the jugular measurements (69.5±10.7 vs. 79.4±5.8%; p<0.001). While the bias (0.64%) was still acceptable, LLOA (-23.8%), ULOA (25.0%) and PE (34.5%) were substantially higher for femoral assessment of ScvO2 by the CeVOX (ScvO2_CeVOX_fem). Analysis of the entire data-pool with jugular as well as femoral CVCs allowed for a multivariate analysis which demonstrated that the position of the CVC per se was not independently associated with the bias ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA. The amount of the bias |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA| was independently associated with the amount of the change of ScvO2_CeVOX compared to the initial calibration to ScvO2_BGA_baseline (|ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA_baseline|) as well as with low values of ScvO2_BGA_baseline. Furthermore, increasing time to the initial calibration was associated to the amount of the bias with borderline significance. A statistical model based on |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA_baseline| and "time to last calibration" derived from an evaluation dataset (80 of 120 datasets, 16 of 24) provided a ROC-AUC of 0.903 to predict an amount of the bias |ScvO2_CeVOX-ScvO2_BGA| ≥5% in an independent validation group (40 datasets of 8 patients).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the CeVOX device is capable to detect stability or instability of ScvO2_BGA. ScvO2_CeVOX accurately estimates ScvO2_BGA in case of stable values. However, intermittent measurement of ScvO2_BGA and re-calibration should be performed in case of substantial changes in ScvO2_CeVOX compared to baseline. Therefore, continuous measurement of ScvO2 with the CeVOX cannot replace ScvO2_BGA in instable patients. On the other hand, CeVOX might be useful for the monitoring of stable patients as a pre-test tool for more differentiated monitoring in case of changes in ScvO2_CeVOX.

Comparison of pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI and global ejection fraction GEF derived from jugular and femoral indicator injection using the PiCCO-2 device: A prospective observational study

Background

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is used to derive cardiac output CO, global end-diastolic volume GEDV and extravascular lung water EVLW. To facilitate interpretation of these data, several ratios have been developed, including pulmonary vascular permeability index (defined as EVLW/(0.25*GEDV)) and global ejection fraction ((4*stroke volume)/GEDV). PVPI and GEF have been associated to the aetiology of pulmonary oedema and systolic cardiac function, respectively. Several studies demonstrated that the use of femoral venous access results in a marked overestimation of GEDV. This also falsely reduces PVPI and GEF. One of these studies suggested a correction formula for femoral venous access that markedly reduced the bias for GEDV. Consequently, the last PiCCO-algorithm requires information about the CVC, and correction for femoral access has been shown. However, two recent studies demonstrated inconsistencies of the last PiCCO algorithm using incorrected GEDV for PVPI, but corrected GEDV for GEF. Nevertheless, these studies were based on mathematical analyses of data displayed in a total of 15 patients equipped with only a femoral, but not with a jugular CVC.

Therefore, this study compared PVPI_fem and GEF_fem derived from femoral TPTD to values derived from jugular indicator injection in 25 patients with both jugular and femoral CVCs.

Methods

54 datasets in 25 patients were recorded. Each dataset consisted of three triplicate TPTDs using the jugular venous access as the gold standard and the femoral access with (PVPI_fem_cor) and without (PVPI_fem_uncor) information about the femoral indicator injection to evaluate, if correction for femoral GEDV pertains to PVPI_fem and GEF_fem.

Results

PVPI_fem_uncor was significantly lower than PVPI_jug (1.48±0.47 vs. 1.84±0.53; p<0.001). Similarly, PVPI_fem_cor was significantly lower than PVPI_jug (1.49±0.46 vs. 1.84±0.53; p<0.001). This is explained by the finding that PVPI_fem_uncor was not different to PVPI_fem_cor (1.48±0.47 vs. 1.49±0.46; n.s.). This clearly suggests that correction for femoral CVC does not pertain to PVPI.

GEF_fem_uncor was significantly lower than GEF_jug (20.6±5.1% vs. 25.0±6.1%; p<0.001). By contrast, GEF_fem_cor was not different to GEF_jug (25.6±5.8% vs. 25.0±6.1%; n.s.). Furthermore, GEF_fem_cor was significantly higher than GEF_fem_uncor (25.6±5.8% vs. 20.6±5.1%; p<0.001). This finding emphasizes that an appropriate correction for femoral CVC is applied to GEF_fem_cor.

The extent of the correction (25.5/20.6; 124%) for GEF and the relation of PVPI_jug/PVPI_fem_uncor (1.84/1.48; 124%) are in the same range as the ratio of GEDVI_fem_uncor/GEDVI_fem_cor (1056ml/m²/821mL/m²; 129%). This further emphasizes that GEF, but not PVPI is corrected in case of femoral indicator injection.

Conclusions

Femoral indicator injection for TPTD results in significantly lower values for PVPI and GEF. While the last PiCCO algorithm appropriately corrects GEF, the correction is not applied to PVPI. Therefore, GEF-values can be used in case of femoral CVC, but PVPI-values are substantially underestimated.

Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study

Sinus rhythm (SR) and controlled mechanical ventilation (CV) are mandatory for the applicability of respiratory changes of the arterial curve such as stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid-responsiveness. Furthermore, several secondary limitations including tidal volumes <8 mL/kg and SVV-values within the "gray zone" of 9-13% impair prediction of fluid-responsiveness by SVV. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of these four conditions in general ICU-patients. This longitudinal observational study analyzed a prospectively maintained haemodynamic database including 4801 transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis measurements of 278 patients (APACHE-II 21.0 ± 7.4). The main underlying diseases were cirrhosis (32%), sepsis (28%), and ARDS (17%). The prevalence of SR and CV was only 19.4% (54/278) in the first measurements (primary endpoint), 18.8% (902/4801) in all measurements and 26.5% (9/34) in measurements with MAP < 65 mmHg and CI < 2.5 L/min/m² and vasopressor therapy. In 69.1% (192/278) of the first measurements and in 65.9% (3165/4801) of all measurements the patients had SR but did not have CV. In 1.8% (5/278) of the first measurements and in 2.5% (119/4801) of all measurements the patients had CV but lacked SR. In 9.7% (27/278) of the first measurements and in 12.8% (615/4801) of all measurements the patients did neither have SR nor CV. Only 20 of 278 (7.2%) of the first measurements and 8.2% of all measurements fulfilled both major criteria (CV, SR) and both minor criteria for the applicability of SVV. The applicability of SVV in ICU-patients is limited due to the absence of mandatory criteria during the majority of measurements.

Impact of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange on Hemodynamic Parameters in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients: An Observational Study

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal treatment with reported beneficial as well as detrimental effects on circulation. However, there is a lack of data using advanced hemodynamic monitoring during TPE. Therefore, we investigated the effects of TPE on hemodynamic parameters derived from transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) as well as the risk for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). We compared hemodynamic parameters obtained before and after a total of 30 sessions of TPE treatment in 10 intensive care unit patients. Among standard hemodynamic parameters, heart rate (P < 0.012) and systolic blood pressure (P < 0.008) significantly increase, whereas neither mean arterial pressure nor diastolic blood pressure was altered after TPE. The TPTD-derived cardiac function parameters, cardiac index (CI; P = 0.035), cardiac power index (CPI; P = 0.008), global ejection fraction (GEF; P = 0.002), and stroke volume index (SVI; P = 0.014), were significantly higher after TPE. Furthermore, systemic vascular index significantly increased (P < 0.042). Among the cardiac preload parameters, central venous pressure was significantly lower after TPE (P < 0.001), while the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) did not change. Contractility marker dPmax did not change. Finally, TPE application did not significantly alter the pulmonary hydration and permeability parameters, extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and pulmonary vascular permeability index. Vasopressor dose was not statistically significantly altered. Considering increases in SVI, CI, GEF, and CPI and stable values for GEDVI, EVLWI, and dPmax, our data do not give any hint for hemodynamic impairment or TRALI.

Consistency of cardiac function index and global ejection fraction with global end-diastolic volume in patients with femoral central venous access for transpulmonary thermodilution: a prospective observational study

Global ejection fraction (GEF) and cardiac function index (CFI) are transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived indices of the systolic function. Their validity relies on an accurate determination of the global end-diastolic volume (GEDV). Due to an overestimation of GEDV using a femoral central venous catheter (CVC) a correction formula for indexed GEDV (GEDVI) has been implemented in the latest PiCCO™-algorithm. However, a recent study demonstrated that correction for femoral CVC does not pertain to pulmonary vascular permeability index PVPI, which is calculated of extravascular lung water EVLW and GEDV. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to evaluate, if GEF and CFI are corrected for femoral CVC. In ten adult ICU-patients with PiCCO™-monitoring, ten triplicate TPTDs were performed within 30 h. 95 complete data sets were analyzed, if a GEDV corrected for CVC site was applied to derive CFI and GEF. Therefore, we compared displayed values CFI_displayed and GEF_displayed to CFI_calculated and GEF_calculated, which were calculated from displayed GEDV, cardiac output and stroke volume. GEDV_calculated derived from division of GEDVI by predicted body surface area did not substantially differ from GEDV_displayed (1448 ± 414 ml vs. 1447 ± 416 ml), which suggests a correction of GEDV for CVC site. However, CFI_displayed was significantly lower than CFI_calculated (3.8 ± 1.6/min vs. 5.1 ± 1. 8/min: p < 0.001), suggesting that CFI_displayed is based on an uncorrected GEDV. By contrast, GEF_calculated (23.1 ± 8.7 %) was not substantially different from GEF_displayed (22.4 ± 8.6 %). Although GEDV and GEF are corrected for femoral CVC site, this does not apply to CFI. However, all indices derived from GEDV should be calculated consistently.

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) before, during and after Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED). A Prospective Study on Feasibility of TPTD and Prediction of Successful Fluid Removal

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients. AKI requires renal replacement therapy (RRT) in up to 10% of patients. Particularly during connection and fluid removal, RRT frequently impairs haemodyamics which impedes recovery from AKI. Therefore, "acute" connection with prefilled tubing and prolonged periods of RRT including sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) has been suggested. Furthermore, advanced haemodynamic monitoring using trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and pulse contour analysis (PCA) might help to define appropriate fluid removal goals.

OBJECTIVES, METHODS

Since data on TPTD to guide RRT are scarce, we investigated the capabilities of TPTD- and PCA-derived parameters to predict feasibility of fluid removal in 51 SLED-sessions (Genius; Fresenius, Germany; blood-flow 150 mL/min) in 32 patients with PiCCO-monitoring (Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany). Furthermore, we sought to validate the reliability of TPTD during RRT and investigated the impact of "acute" connection and of disconnection with re-transfusion on haemodynamics. TPTDs were performed immediately before and after connection as well as disconnection.

RESULTS

Comparison of cardiac index derived from TPTD (CItd) and PCA (CIpc) before, during and after RRT did not give hints for confounding of TPTD by ongoing RRT. Connection to RRT did not result in relevant changes in haemodynamic parameters including CItd. However, disconnection with re-transfusion of the tubing volume resulted in significant increases in CItd, CIpc, CVP, global end-diastolic volume index GEDVI and cardiac power index CPI. Feasibility of the pre-defined ultrafiltration goal without increasing catecholamines by >10% (primary endpoint) was significantly predicted by baseline CPI (ROC-AUC 0.712; p = 0.010) and CItd (ROC-AUC 0.662; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD is feasible during SLED. "Acute" connection does not substantially impair haemodynamics. Disconnection with re-transfusion increases preload, CI and CPI. The extent of these changes might be used as a "post-RRT volume change" to guide fluid removal during subsequent RRTs. CPI is the most useful marker to guide fluid removal by SLED.

A systematic database-derived approach to improve indexation of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived global end-diastolic volume

Global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) has been indexed to body surface area (BSA). However, data validating this indexation of GEDV are scarce. Furthermore, it has been suggested to index GEDV to "predicted BSA" based on predicted body weight. Therefore, we aimed to identify biometric parameters independently associated with GEDV. We analyzed a database including 3812 TPTD measurements in 234 patients treated in the ICU of a German university hospital. GEDVI indexed to actual BSA was significantly lower than GEDVI indexed to predicted BSA (748 ± 179 vs. 804 ± 190 mL/m²; p < 0.001). GEDV was independently associated with older age, male sex, height, and actual body weight. In a regression model for the estimation of GEDV, age and height were the most important parameters: Each year in age and each cm in height increased GEDV by 9 and 15 mL, respectively. In addition to height and weight also age and sex should be considered for indexation of GEDV.

Extravascular lung water in critical care: recent advances and clinical applications

Extravascular lung water (EVLW) is the amount of fluid that is accumulated in the interstitial and alveolar spaces. In lung oedema, EVLW increases either because of increased lung permeability or because of increased hydrostatic pressure in the pulmonary capillaries, or both. Increased EVLW is always potentially life-threatening, mainly because it impairs gas exchange and reduces lung compliance. The only technique that provides an easy measurement of EVLW at the bedside is transpulmonary thermodilution. The validation of EVLW measurements by thermodilution was based on studies showing reasonable correlations with gravimetry or thermo-dye dilution in experimental and clinical studies. EVLW should be indexed to predicted body weight. This indexation reduces the proportion of ARDS patients for whom EVLW is in the normal range. Compared to non-indexed EVLW, indexed EVLW (EVLWI) is better correlated with the lung injury score and the oxygenation and it is a better predictor of mortality of patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Transpulmonary thermodilution also provides the pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), which is an indirect reflection of the integrity of the alveolocapillary barrier. As clinical applications, EVLWI and PVPI may be useful to guide fluid management of patients at risk of fluid overload, as during septic shock and ARDS. High EVLWI and PVPI values predict mortality in several categories of critically ill patients, especially during ARDS. Thus, fluid administration should be limited when EVLWI is already high. Whatever the value of EVLWI, PVPI may indicate that fluid administration is particularly at risk of aggravating lung oedema. In the acute phase of haemodynamic resuscitation during septic shock and ARDS, high EVLWI and PVPI values may warn of the risk of fluid overload and prevent excessive volume expansion. At the post-resuscitation phase, they may prompt initiation of fluid removal thereby achieving a negative fluid balance.

Near-normal values of extravascular lung water in children

OBJECTIVES

To define near-normal values of extravascular lung water indexed to body weight in children.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter observational study.

SETTING

Medical/surgical PICUs of 5 multinational hospitals.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight children with a median age of 4 years (range 1 month to 17 year) with heterogeneous PICU admission diagnoses were included. Extravascular lung water measurements from these children were collected after resolution of their illness. Obtained values were indexed to actual body weight and height and subsequently related to age.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Extravascular lung water indexed to body weight correlated with age (r2 = 0.7) and could be categorized in three-age groups consisting of significantly different median extravascular lung water indexed to body weight values (5th-95th percentile): less than 1 year, 9-29 mL/kg; 1-5 years, 7-25 mL/kg; and 5-17 years, 5-13 mL/kg. Extravascular lung water indexed to height did not correlate to age and resulted in an age-independent near-normal value of less than 315 mL/m.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger children have higher values of extravascular lung water indexed to actual body weight. Age categorized near-normal values of extravascular lung water indexed to body weight are presented for possible clinical use. Furthermore, we suggest to index extravascular lung water to height, which seems to be age independent.