Humoral Responses to Diverse Autoimmune Disease-Associated Antigens in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis: an immune attack on astrocyte-mediated ion and water homeostasis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS. The chain of events that results in demyelinating lesions is not understood, although most theories assume a primary immune attack on myelin. However, the glial cell adhesion molecule GlialCAM, which forms part of a protein complex in astrocytic endfeet that is crucial for brain ion and water homeostasis, was recently identified as a target for autoimmunity in patients with MS. This complex also includes the astrocytic transmembrane protein MLC1, the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4) and the potassium channel KIR4.1. Autoimmunity against AQP4 underlies another demyelinating disorder, neuromyelitis optica, and autoimmunity against KIR4.1 has been implicated in a subtype of MS. Genetic defects in any of these proteins cause leukodystrophies with disruption of brain ion and water homeostasis, which is regulated by astrocytes and secondarily affects myelin. In this Perspective, we argue that an immune attack on the ion and water homeostasis machinery in astrocytic endfeet, rather than directly on myelin, is the primary event in MS and that myelin damage is a consequence of astrocyte dysfunction. This hypothesis is supported by pathological studies on tissue from people with MS and has important implications for disease models and therapy targets.

Association of Systemic Markers of Inflammation with Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease and Sjogren's Syndrome in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM©) Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the possible role of systemic inflammation in dry eye disease (DED) via systemic inflammatory marker associations with DED signs and symptoms, and an analysis of a subgroup with Sjogren's Syndrome (SS).

METHODS

Participant serums were analyzed using line immunoassays (LIAs) for the presence of antibodies against 34 systemic inflammatory markers. Using the 2012 American College of Rheumatology definition, the 481 participants were categorized into group 1 (SS; n = 52), group 2 (autoimmune disease not including SS; n = 66), or group 3 (control, i.e. no autoimmune disease; n = 363).

RESULTS

3 markers were positive in ≥10% of participants: Ro52 (19.3%), Scl-70 (15.0%), CN-1A (14.2%). 2 markers were positively associated with symptoms: PM-Scl100 (p = 0.02), Sm (p = 0.009). 5 markers were positively associated with signs: U2SnRNP A', Ro52, La, DNA, Ro60. SS participants showed significantly higher positivity for 4 markers compared to participants with no autoimmune disease: PL-7 (p = 0.02), Ro52 (p < 0.0001), La (p < 0.0001), Ro60 (p < 0.0001). SS participants showed significantly higher positivity for 3 markers compared to participants with another autoimmune disease: Ro52 (p < 0.0001), La (p = 0.002), Ro60 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show evidence of significant systemic inflammation in participants with moderate-to-severe DED, based on the markers tested. PM-Scl100 and Sm may be associated with more severe DED symptoms. U2SnRNP A', Ro52, La, DNA, and Ro60 may be associated with more severe ocular surface disease. Ro52 and PL-7 may be diagnostic markers for SS. Future research evaluating these relationships and their clinical significance is needed.

Differentiating central nervous system demyelinating disorders: The role of clinical, laboratory, imaging characteristics and peripheral blood type I interferon activity

Objective: While multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered the cornerstone of autoimmune demyelinating CNS disorders, systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) are important MS mimickers. We sought to explore whether distinct clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics along with quantitation of peripheral blood type I interferon (IFN) activity could aid in differentiating between them.

Methods: A total of 193 consecutive patients with imaging features suggesting the presence of CNS demyelinating disease with or without relevant clinical manifestations underwent full clinical, laboratory, and imaging evaluation, including testing for specific antibodies against 15 cellular antigens. Expression analysis of type I IFN-inducible genes (MX-1, IFIT-1, and IFI44) was performed by real-time PCR, and a type I IFN score, reflecting type I IFN peripheral activity, was calculated. After joint neurological/rheumatological evaluation and 1 year of follow-up, patients were classified into MS spectrum and CNS autoimmune disorders.

Results: While 66.3% (n = 128) of the patients were diagnosed with MS spectrum disorders (predominantly relapsing–remitting MS), 24.9% (n = 48) were included in the CNS autoimmune group, and out of those, one-fourth met the criteria for SAD (6.7% of the cohort, n = 13); the rest (18.1% of the cohort, n = 35), despite showing evidence of systemic autoimmunity, did not fulfill SAD criteria and comprised the “demyelinating disease with autoimmune features” (DAF) subgroup. Compared to the MS spectrum, CNS autoimmune patients were older, more frequently females, with increased rates of hypertension/hyperlipidemia, family history of autoimmunity, cortical dysfunction, anti-nuclear antibody titers ≥1/320, anticardiolipin IgM positivity, and atypical for MS magnetic resonance imaging lesions. Conversely, lower rates of infratentorial and callosal MRI lesions, CSF T2 oligoclonal bands, and IgG-index positivity were observed in CNS autoimmune patients. Patients fulfilling SAD criteria, but not the DAF group, had significantly higher peripheral blood type I IFN scores at baseline compared to MS spectrum [median (IQR)]: 50.18 (152.50) vs. −0.64 (6.75), p-value: 0.0001.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that underlying systemic autoimmunity is not uncommon in patients evaluated for possible CNS demyelination. Distinct clinical, imaging and laboratory characteristics can aid in early differentiation between MS and CNS-involving systemic autoimmunity allowing for optimal therapeutic strategies. Activated type I IFN pathway could represent a key mediator among MS-like-presenting SADs and therefore a potential therapeutic target.

Pathogenesis of autoimmune demyelination: from multiple sclerosis to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease

Autoimmunity plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of demyelination. Multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD) are now recognised as separate disease entities under the amalgam of human central nervous system demyelinating disorders. While these disorders share inherent similarities, investigations into their distinct clinical presentations and lesion pathologies have aided in differential diagnoses and understanding of disease pathogenesis. An interplay of various genetic and environmental factors contributes to each disease, many of which implicate an autoimmune response. The pivotal role of the adaptive immune system has been highlighted by the diagnostic autoantibodies in NMOSD and MOGAD, and the presence of autoreactive lymphocytes in MS lesions. While a number of autoantigens have been proposed in MS, recent emphasis on the contribution of B cells has shed new light on the well‐established understanding of T cell involvement in pathogenesis. This review aims to synthesise the clinical characteristics and pathological findings, discuss existing and emerging hypotheses regarding the aetiology of demyelination and evaluate recent pathogenicity studies involving T cells, B cells, and autoantibodies and their implications in human demyelination.

Anti-Kir4.1 Antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis: Specificity and Pathogenicity

The glial cells in the central nervous system express diverse inward rectifying potassium channels (Kir). They express multiple Kir channel subtypes that are likely to have distinct functional roles related to their differences in conductance, and sensitivity to intracellular and extracellular factors. Dysfunction in a major astrocyte potassium channel, Kir4.1, appears as an early pathological event underlying neuronal phenotypes in several neurological diseases. The autoimmune effects on the potassium channel have not yet been fully described in the literature. However, several research groups have reported that the potassium channels are an immune target in patients with various neurological disorders. In 2012, Srivastava et al. reported about Kir4.1, a new immune target for autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Follow-up studies have been conducted by several research groups, but no clear conclusion has been reached. Most follow-up studies, including ours, have reported that the prevalence of Kir4.1-seropositive patients with MS was lower than that in the initial study. Therefore, we extensively review studies on the method of antibody testing, seroprevalence of MS, and other neurological diseases in patients with MS. Finally, based on the role of Kir4.1 in MS, we consider whether it could be an immune target in this disease.

Bacterial transportable toxins of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in multiple sclerosis. Nose-to-brain direct

Intranasal administration delivers molecules directly to the brain bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Three distinct routes of access have been identified; olfactory, trigeminal and via the paranasal sub-mucosa of the posterior sinuses. Consequently, environmental toxins may access the CNS directly to induce inflammatory and degenerative disease. They may also activate bacterial species of the nasal mucosal microbiome to release both immune-deviating cell wall antigens and transportable neurotoxins with local direct access to the CNS. Evidence is reviewed that toxins of the nasal bacterial microbiota may be directly implicated in the inflammatory and degenerative pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

Regional Distribution of CNS Antigens Differentially Determines T-Cell Mediated Neuroinflammation in a CX3CR1-Dependent Manner

T cells continuously sample CNS-derived antigens in the periphery, yet it is unknown how they sample and respond to CNS antigens derived from distinct brain areas. We expressed ovalbumin (OVA) neoepitopes in regionally distinct CNS areas (Cnp-OVA and Nes-OVA mice) to test peripheral antigen sampling by OVA-specific T cells under homeostatic and neuroinflammatory conditions. We show that antigen sampling in the periphery is independent of regional origin of CNS antigens in both male and female mice. However, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is differentially influenced in Cnp-OVA and Nes-OVA female mice. Although there is the same frequency of CD45^high CD11b+ CD11c+ CX3CL1+ myeloid cell-T-cell clusters in neoepitope-expressing areas, EAE is inhibited in Nes-OVA female mice and accelerated in CNP-OVA female mice. Accumulation of OVA-specific T cells and their immunomodulatory effects on EAE are CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) dependent. These data show that despite similar levels of peripheral antigen sampling, CNS antigen-specific T cells differentially influence neuroinflammatory disease depending on the location of cognate antigens and the presence of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our data show that peripheral T cells similarly recognize neoepitopes independent of their origin within the CNS under homeostatic conditions. Contrastingly, during ongoing autoimmune neuroinflammation, neoepitope-specific T cells differentially influence clinical score and pathology based on the CNS regional location of the neoepitopes in a CX3CR1-dependent manner. Altogether, we propose a novel mechanism for how T cells respond to regionally distinct CNS derived antigens and contribute to CNS autoimmune pathology.

Absence of antibodies against KIR4.1 in multiple sclerosis: A three-technique approach and systematic review

Introduction

Antibodies targeting the inward-rectifying potassium channel KIR4.1 have been associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) but studies using diverse techniques have failed to replicate this association. The detection of these antibodies is challenging; KIR4.1 glycosylation patterns and the use of diverse technical approaches may account for the disparity of results. We aimed to replicate the association using three different approaches to overcome the technical limitations of a single technique. We also performed a systematic review to examine the association of anti-KIR4.1 antibodies with MS.

Methods

Serum samples from patients with MS (n = 108) and controls (n = 77) were tested for the presence of anti-KIR4.1 antibodies using three methods: 1) by ELISA with the low-glycosylated fraction of recombinant KIR4.1 purified from transfected HEK293 cells according to original protocols; 2) by immunocytochemistry using KIR4.1-transfected HEK293 cells; and 3) by immunocytochemistry using the KIR4.1.-transfected MO3.13 oligodendrocyte cell line. We developed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of anti-KIR4.1 antibodies with MS according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

We did not detect anti-KIR4.1 antibodies in the MS patients or in controls using ELISA. Neither did we detect any significant reactivity against the antigen on the cell surface using the KIR4.1-transfected HEK293 cells or the KIR4.1-transfected MO3.13 cells. We included 13 prospective controlled studies in the systematic review. Only three studies showed a positive association between anti-KIR4.1 and MS. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analysis of their results.

Conclusion

We found no association between anti-KIR4.1 antibody positivity and MS. Although this lack of replication may be due to technical limitations, evidence from our study and others is mounting against the role of KIR4.1 as a relevant MS autoantigen.